Muslims ‘Procreate Like Mushrooms After the Rain,’ ‘The Problem is Islam,’ says a Florida Professor.
Tag Archives: Hamburger Morgenpost
Reports: Last Year’s ISIS Terrorists are This Year’s Mid-East Refugees – Planes, Trains and Automobiles…
Letting all the Muslims in is the biggest mistake we have ever made and will likely lead to the end of Western Civilization. Why haven’t any Muslim countries taken them in? Maybe this is civilization Jihad as developed by the Muslim Brotherhood.
The Sudden Jihad Syndrome
Sudden jihad syndrome was coined by Daniel Pipes, an excellent scholar. Jihad, such as the recent attack in Chattanooga seem to done by “nice” people. How do we explain “nice Muslims” who commit jihad? Some nice Muslims are simply do not follow much of Islam. They are Islam, light. Then there are other nice Muslims who know all of Islam, including jihad, who are pleasant because they need to live in our society. But deep within, they have the heart of a jihadist which can manifest suddenly.
How can we tell the difference? Are they really a friend or a deceiver? There is no way to know the heart of a Muslim.
The Real Islam
Incredible. This video lets you see how radical Islam has made terror and violence an integral part of life in many, once very normal, Muslim cities such as Beirut, Tehran, Gaza and even Copenhagen which has absorbed a large number of Muslims in recent years… We have not yet woken up. This is a war of ideology and there are some very hateful, violent Muslims who are determined to make the world look and act in accordance with their beliefs.
In the name of Allah.
“Prepare for a Nuclear Iran”
Posts by Eidelberg [2008] and Bolton [2009]
Essay 1: “Iran: Our Most Dangerous Enemy”
Paul Eidelberg (May 9, 2008)
Iran has been at war with the United States and Israel ever since the Khomeini-inspired Iranian Revolution of 1979. This is, or may become, the most far-reaching revolution in human history. Iran is not only the epicenter of international terrorism. Iran’s ultimate goal is to restore the Persian Empire and spread Shiite Islam throughout the world. This is not fantasy….
Iran is gaining decisive influence on Syria and Iraq. Iran’s proxy, Hezbollah, virtually rules Lebanon. [Hamas is another proxy of Iran, has access to the Sinai where it could threaten Egypt].
If this was not enough, Iran controls the world’s spigot of oil flowing through the Persian Gulf. This nation of 70 million people can wreck the world’s economy. With control of the vast oil resources of the Persian Gulf, a nuclear-armed Iran, with its long-range Silkworm ballistic missiles, would cow an already craven Europe, without which the American economy would utterly collapse, period.
Hence, the question arises: “Will the U.S. or will Israel launch a preemptive attack on Iran, the engine of Islamic imperialism?” At stake is the survival of Western civilization. [Iran’s] maledictions, “death to America” and “death to Israel” speak of a world without Christianity and Judaism.
The U.S. National Intelligence Estimate of December 2007 reported that Iran had ceased its nuclear development program in 2003. Former UN Ambassador John Bolton wrote an excoriating critique of the NIE report in The Washington Post (December 7, 2007). He warned that “the NIE opens the way for Iran to achieve its military nuclear ambitions in an essentially unmolested fashion, to the detriment of us all” (my emphasis). This is precisely why Mr. Bolton wrote an op-ed piece in The Wall Street Journal virtually encouraging Israel to launch a pre-emptive strike against Iran. He boldly asserted that the US should support Israel before, during, and after such a strike – should it take place. [Hardly to be expected with Obama in the White House.]
Essay 2: “It’s Crunch Time for Israel on Iran”
John Bolton (July 28, 2009)
It’s routine for senior American officials to descend on Jerusalem. Most important was a visit of [former] Defense Secretary Robert Gates. His central objective was to dissuade Israel from carrying out military strikes against Iran’s nuclear weapons facilities. Under the guise of counseling “patience,” Mr. Gates conveyed President Barack Obama’s emphatic thumbs down on military force.
[Meanwhile], Iran’s progress with nuclear weapons and air defenses means that Israel’s military option is declining over time. Worse, Mr. Obama has no new strategic thinking on Iran. He vaguely promises to offer Tehran the carrot of diplomacy followed by an empty threat of sanctions down the road if Iran does not comply with the U.S.’s requests. This is precisely the European Union’s approach, which has failed for over six years.
Unlike Obama, Israel sees the diplomatic and military situation concerning Iran in a very inauspicious light. Israel fears that the Obama administration, once ensnared in negotiations, will find it very hard to extricate itself. The Israelis are probably right. To prove the success of his “open hand” or “outreach” policy, Mr. Obama will declare victory for “diplomacy” even if it means little to no gains on Iran’s nuclear program.
Under the worst-case scenario, Iran will continue improving its nuclear facilities and Mr. Obama will become the first U.S. president to tie the issue of Iran’s nuclear capabilities into negotiations about Israel’s nuclear capabilities.
Relations between the U.S. and Israel are more strained now than at any time since the 1956 Suez Canal crisis. Obama’s message to Israel (via Gates) not to attack Iran, and the U.S. pressure he brought to bear, highlight the weight of Israel’s lonely burden.
Striking Iran’s nuclear program will not be precipitous or poorly thought out. Israel’s attack, if it happens, will have followed enormously difficult deliberation over terrible imponderables, and years of patiently waiting on innumerable failed diplomatic efforts by the United States.
Absent Israeli action, prepare for a nuclear Iran.
Islam vs. all other religions for first place in the murder category
Determining the validity or truth of an idea or statement isn’t always easy and never has been easy. A fourteenth-century philosopher William of Occam had a useful rule of thumb for this quandary. We now know it as Occam’s Razor, and it is often stated thusly: “The simplest explanation is usually the best.”
The original Latin –“Pluralitas non est ponenda sine necessitate” — adds a wrinkle. This translates roughly, “Multiple variables are not to be posited without necessity.”
A more modern form of this principle is called the Duck test which is a humorous term for a form of inductive reasoning. This is its usual expression: If it looks like a duck, swims like a duck, and quacks like a duck, then it probably is a duck.
Iran publishes book on how to outwit USA and destroy Israel…
Apparently John Kerry, who served in Vietnam, doesn’t agree that the Iranians have done any of these things.
John Kerry: Iranians Screaming “Death To America” Doesn’t Mean They Want To Kill Us
This year in November it will have been 36 of Iranians claiming then what to destroy the great Satan America! Kerry now claims that he has personally stopped that from being true — really John?
WHY THE IRAN DEAL IS NO DEAL . . .
No deal is better than this deal!
Does Obama Want Iran to Nuke Israel?
The republicans have demonstrated time and time again that they are in 100% agreement with what BHO is doing. They attack any conservatives and/or tea party members and brand them as radicals. Therefore there is no reason to not believe what was written here by ERIK RUSH. The prove is that a treaty requires a 2/3’s vote to approve; the republicans turned it into a 2/3’s vote to stop. Since that is going to be impossible it guaranteed approval. Does that make any sense?;
Centinel2012 