Tag Archives: Jeffrey Epstein

Aug 28 2024

Zuckerberg Admits he Complied with Biden-Harris Censorship


Posted originally on Aug 28, 2024 By Martin Armstrong |  

Mark Zuckerberg is squealing to the press that Joe Biden and Kamala Harris “repeatedly pressured” him to censor content on Facebook before and during their time in the White House. Zuckerberg was a willing participant who openly censored his platform for over four years. Suddenly, Zuckerberg is coming forward to admit that caved to the pressure and worked alongside Biden-Harris to turn his social media platform into a propaganda machine.

Zuckerberg has Banned NY Post

“I believe the government pressure was wrong and I regret that we were not more outspoken about it,” Zuckerberg wrote in the letter dated Aug. 26 and posted on the committee’s Facebook page and to its account on X. Anyone who published “disinformation” was censored. You were not allowed to question the COVID narrative and anyone who did was deplatformed. The CEO noted that Biden and Harris even asked him to censor those who were posting memes or joking about anything regarding the pandemic. Zuckerberg stated that in hindsight, he would not allow the White House to use his platform to trample over the First Amendment.

Babylon Bee Facebook Popup

The White House released a statement saying that it did what was best to “protect public health and safety.” As Bobby Kennedy said, the government will ALWAYS state they are looking after public safety when they remove our rights. “Our position has been clear and consistent: we believe tech companies and other private actors should take into account the effects their actions have on the American people while making independent choices about the information they present,” according to the spokesperson.

2022_04_20_Zuckerberg manipulating Elections

Not only did Facebook/Meta work to reshape the COVID narrative, but they helped to form the Russian disinformation narrative against Trump and hide the Hunter Biden laptop story ahead of the 2020 US Presidential Election. The social media platform demoted any reporting from the New York Post to protect Joe Biden’s image, with Zuckerberg saying is has “been made clear that the reporting was not Russian disinformation, and in retrospect, we shouldn’t have demoted the story.” Furthermore, the Biden-Harris tyrants asked Facebook for help with “electoral infrastructure.” “The idea here was to make sure local election jurisdictions across the country had the resources they needed to help people vote safely during a pandemic,” he stated.

So for over four years, Mark Zuckerberg knew that his organization was willingly complacent in spreading actual disinformation to reshape public perception. They even deplatformed former President Donald Trump in addition to spreading LIES to make the public believe that he stole the 2016 US Presidential Election from Hillary with the help of Russia. Now, Zuckerberg said he is coming forward to say that he was simply bullied by the establishment. No – Mark Zuckerberg was complacent in his crime and waited too long to speak out. Perhaps he is worried facing his day in court under a Trump victory, or maybe he is reluctant to watch his wealth vanish under a Kamala presidency. Either way, Biden and Harris should also be held responsible for blatantly ignoring the Constitution and making free speech a punishable offense.

Aug 28 2024

Smith Issues Superseding Indictment to Avoid A Public Hearing That He Would Have Lost


Posted Aug 27, 2024 By Martin Armstrong |

Smith Garland

Special counsel Jack Smith filed a superseding indictment in the same DC case, showing how desperate the Democrats are to stop Trump from winning the White House, for he and RFK would shut down the Neocons who are taking us into World War III. Smith is outright seeking to Interfere in the 2024 Election. Smith was also never appointed or approved by Congress. He is an unauthorized hack of Merrick Garland, another Neocon who hates Russians. Garland also claims that his family was persecuted by Russians, along with Antony Blinken and Victoria Nuland. What are the odds that three people with personal family grievances with Russians control the Biden White House?

FBI Jan 6th

The FBI has conceded that they had so many agents there on January 6th that they could not even give a number to Congress. There is reasonable doubt as to who actually broke into the Capitol. Was it FBI undercover that created the affair to allow Pelosi to suspend normal rules for counting the votes? They want to blame Trump, but the beneficiary was actually Pelosi and Biden. There was also concern that calling in the National Guard presented an unspoken risk. Those in the military tend to lean more toward Trump than Biden. There were concerns that the National Guard could have switched sides and supported Trump vs Pelosi/Biden. After all, that is how coups often take place.

The actual rigging of the election took place in Congress. The claims that Trump denied bringing in the National Guard was false. Retired U.S. Army Lt. Gen. Keith Kellogg testified before Congress that President Donald Trump did, in fact, request National Guard troops be deployed in Washington D.C. before the breach of the U.S. Capitol on Jan. 6, 2021. Kellogg also said he was present at the time of Trump’s request and that Congress should release his testimony to the public, but the Democrats withheld that testimony. The American Military News also wrote:

“David Bossie, who wrote the Washington Times op-ed noted Jan. 3 conversation between Trump and Miller and said the Jan. 6 select committee is “crafting a narrative that doesn’t quite add up and omits important facts that would not stand if there were proper Republican representation on the committee.”

NBC News reported that the commanding general of the District of Columbia National Guard told members of Congress Wednesday that he had troops ready to deploy immediately to the Capitol on Jan. 6th. Still, it took more than three hours for the Defense Department to give the green light. This has raised questions about the Deep State and did they delayed the National Guard to ensure that the FBI broke the windows and led the protestors into the Capitol so that Pelosi was able to declare EMERGENCY RULES, shutting down all challenges to any state vote. If a state is challenged, it is to be debated in the full House. Pelosi imposed the COVID Rule that restricts the maximum number of people on the floor to 53. Any election rigging took place in Congress. It was not about voting machines or dead people voting which always takes place in every election.

Jack Smith has revised everything because he would have had to reveal his case is a mini-trial all over evidence in light of the Supreme Court. If Smith had tried to proceed under the original indictment would have given Trump a hearing that would have turned into a mini-trial. Smith would have been forced to bring in his witnesses and experts to testify and make the case for why Trump’s charges should remain or should be dropped. This superseding indictment was really to fold his case, which would have been questionable to begin with, and he would have lost respect in the public eye all before the election. The judges in all of Trump’s ongoing criminal cases must go through to apply the Supreme Court’s presidential immunity decision.

While we have the diehard Democrats who do not care about the Constitution or the rule of law, they spell “justice” using two words: “JUST US” and do not care about the future. The Supreme Court also held that prosecutors have ABSOLUTE IMMUNITY and judges, but the President should not be above the law? Why? They are?

The Supreme Court in 1993 also was confronted by the constant abuse of prosecutors in an investigative context. They finally ruled that abuse of the investigative process is grounds to deny the prosecutor’s absolute immunity under Buckley v. Fitzsimmons, 509 U.S. 259 (1993). That ruling reversed the holding of Absolute Immunity for prosecutors. The Immunity decision in the Trump case follows the same path that official acts are immune, the same as Smith enjoys. Still, UNOFFICIAL acts do not carry absolute immunity in the same way as the improper investigative acts Smith.

So let’s stop the partisan BS, and without the rule of law, NO NATION can stand!!!!!!!

This superseding indictment was to avoid an evidentiary hearing that would have been a mini-trial that would have Smith losing much of his wind, looking to the entire world that is just a partisan hack with the sole purpose of interfering in the 2024 election.

Aug 28 2024

The Lawfare Group Draw up a Modified 4 Count Indictment Hoping to Regenerate Legal Battles Against President Trump


Posted originally on the CTH on August 27, 2024 | Sundance

It’s really not Jack Smith, so we should drop the pretenses.  Mary McCord, Norm Eisen and Andrew Weissmann have recrafted a new DC indictment against President Trump by dropping around 10 pages of fraudulent evidence from the prior indictment and labeling it a “superseding indictment.”

The 36-page indictment is available HERE.  Essentially, after the supreme court decision on immunity, the majority of the previous case against President Trump was likely to fail, so Mary, Norm and Andrew went back and modified the previously lawfare to fit a narrower scale as requested by the supreme court.

The Lawfare crew then hand off the indictment to Jack Smith who runs it through a Grand Jury, and re-files it as a new set of issues; however, the majority of the case is structurally the same, they just took out the evidence they were using.  This fiasco does not appear to be any better than the previous pages of Lawfare.

(Via Politico) – […] The new indictment removes some specific allegations against Trump but contains the same four criminal charges, including conspiracy to defraud the United States. It’s a signal that Smith believes the high court’s immunity decision doesn’t pose a major impediment to convicting the former president.

“The superseding indictment, which was presented to a new grand jury that had not previously heard evidence in this case, reflects the Government’s efforts to respect and implement the Supreme Court’s holdings and remand instructions,” Smith’s team wrote in an accompanying court filing.

The development is unlikely to alter the reality that a trial in the case before the November election looks impossible. In fact, the new indictment could drag the case out further — defense attorneys often seek delays after prosecutors revise criminal allegations.

Both sides face a Friday deadline to propose next steps to U.S. District Judge Tanya Chutkan, the Biden appointee who is overseeing the proceedings in the trial court. Chutkan has scheduled a Sept. 5 hearing to set a course for the case. (read more)

Aug 28 2024

Mark Zuckerberg Admits to Congress He Worked with Joe Biden and White House to Control Speech in America – Says, He “Regrets” Doing It


Posted originally on the CTH on August 27, 2024 

Great, years later, at a time when it seems that no one cares about the issue, nor will anyone in a position of capability actually do anything about what he now admits, Facebook CEO Mark Zuckerberg says he was working with the White House specifically to censor Americans by removing content on social media and he regrets it.

Just effen’ perfect…. The zombie minded leftist killers of speech and information, have overwhelmed the ramparts, crossed the moat, destroyed our gates, constitutional defenses and drawbridges, and are now bashing loudly on the interior doors in their bloodlust effort to take full control.  Meanwhile the few of us who remain are on the other side of that splintering door; veins bulging, muscles strained, pushing and holding back with all our might against every surge and attack wave…. and Zuckerberg nervously says, “whoops, sorry for dropping the drawbridge guys.”  Good grief Mark, shut up and grab an axe now!

.

Sometimes you just have to laugh at the revelations people have, when they have them, and their abject failure to see how monumental the damage was/is as a result of their previous stupidity.

The city on the hill is burning, we are trying to save the women and children, and Zuckerberg is saying, “hey, sorry guys – but I let the drawbridge down because they seemed like such nice people.”….

It’s truly not a matter of forgiveness even playing a part of this process any longer.  Spiritually and psychologically, I am prone to forgive everyone now, even the ‘dindunuffins’, not because I can manifest my better angels – but rather because their faces are just so mind-dummingly fraught with stupidity, and I just want to cherish the remaining embers of liberty in peace without having to notice Zuckerbergs’ existence.

Maybe this admission by Zuckerberg will help a few dozen more hardcore leftists wake up.

I shall pray it does.

Aug 27 2024

Pakistan Arrests Man for Disinformation on Behalf of the UK


Posted originally on Aug 27, 2024 By Martin Armstrong 

Pakistan India Map

The United Kingdom has threatened to extradite foreigners who dare to speak out on the migrant crisis. There does not need to be a crime, as spreading “disinformation” is considered a crime because the perpetrator may cause OTHERS to act violently. Unfortunately, foreign nation are now abiding by these disinformation laws.

Pakistan arrested a man for posting about the Southport murders on his Twitter/X account. He simply questioned why three young girls were stabbed to death by a man who many believe to be a Muslim migrant. The UK government is outraged that the public is questioning the coward’s immigration status rather than protecting other young girls from meeting the same fate. Pakistan’s Federal Investigation Agency said that internet user Farhan Asif is guilty of committing an international cybercrime for sharing his views online.

Censorship

“I don’t know how such a small article or a minor Twitter account could cause widespread confusion,” Asif said. Police raided his home and confiscated all of his electronics. Again, he questioned the murders in Southport while residing in a foreign nation. Yet, police are accusing him of creating “a sense of fear” and fueling riots in the UK. Pakistan went as far as claiming that Asif damaged his own nation’s reputation.

The United Kingdom opened the door to utter chaos as free speech is NOT permitted on the internet. We are talking about government agencies raiding homes over posts on social media. Asif himself is a Muslim man from a Muslim nation. He is thousands of miles away from the protests and has no apparent connection to the protestors. Yet he’s in legal trouble for allegedly promoting hate speech against his own people. It’s not hate speech but anti-government speech that these tyrants are concerned about silencing. People can cheer for Hamas, the destruction of Israel, and even protest on behalf of implementing Shira Law. But everyone who questions the government’s policy on open borders is now a criminal. How widespread will this become?

Pakistan is already looking to pass legislation to ban fake news or disinformation. Mocking someone on the internet will be a punishable offense. You cannot speak out against any government official or agency. Pakistan’s government already has a Twitter/X account where they expect citizens to tag them over any perceived malice online. You simply cannot speak out against the narrative anywhere. Of course, the Interior Ministry said the new crackdown on social media is in the “interest of upholding national security, maintaining public order, and preserving the integrity of our nation.” This is what EVERY government will say in regard to censorship attempts. They already control the radio, TV, and paper news, but they now must silence the people from sharing news among themselves. There is an outright war on information between the people and governments.

Aug 13 2024

Beyond Orwell


Posted originally on the CTH on August 12, 2024 | Sundance

Mass formation psychosis.

Remember when the Australians were putting people into forced quarantine camps for failing to take vaccinations?  Remember when the New Zealanders were arrested for going on a subversive trip to McDonalds and violating their containment zones?  Remember when Americans were arrested for going to playgrounds or parks?  Remember when EU citizens were arrested for not carrying their vaccine passports?

Well… If you remember those examples that factually happened, then you can likely see how this is just another part of the continuum.  WATCH:

.

There is no such thing as “misinformation” or “disinformation“, there is only information.

You were not born with a brain requiring you to believe everything you are told. You were born with a brain that allows you to process information and formulate opinions using discernment.

There is only INFORMATION. The variables within the information you receive are accuracy or inaccuracy; truth or lies.

~Sundance

Aug 11 2024

Is this Election Going to All Fake Photos?


Posted originally on Aug 11, 2024 By Martin Armstrong 

Harris Photoshopped Crowd R

Is anything real anymore? This photo appears to be Photoshopped, for when you look at the reflection on the underbelly of the plane and on the engine, you do not see the crowd. The polls will be rigged just as they were in 2016 and in London for BREXIT. The press is no more trustworthy than a career liar. This is why Socrates correctly forecasted both the 2016 election and BREXIT when the polls all claimed that Hillary would win and BREXIT would not pass. Newsweek had even sent out their edition assuming Hillary would win.

Newsweek Madam President Hillary Clinton R
Aug 6 2024

Harrington: Most Important Thing To Regime Is The Lie And Selling The Lie


Posted originally on Rumble By Bannons War Room on: Aug 05, 2024 at 08:00 pm EST

Aug 6 2024

Google Loses Anti-Trust Case on Searches


rches

Posted originally on Aug 5, 2024 By Martin Armstrong 

Google

In what will be a landmark legal decision, a federal judge has ruled that Google has violated antitrust laws by maintaining its monopoly power in the markets for general search services and general search text advertisements. This ruling was issued on August 5th, right on our model by Judge Amit Mehta. This concludes a very lengthy legal battle initiated by the U.S. Department of Justice and a coalition of state attorneys general that began back in October 2020. It was alleged that the tech giant engaged in anti-competitive practices by establishing exclusive agreements with browser developers, mobile device manufacturers, and wireless carriers, according to the ruling. That was the critical centerpiece of this case

Google’s search has also been skewed for political manipulation.

Aug 5 2024

Important Information Regarding My Posts


Determining what is real and what is not real is not an easy task today. When I do research I only use trusted sources or government sources. Trusted sources are those that have a history of being correct over long periods of time. Govenrment sources are always vary iffy as they are developed by the administrative state and that means that “politics” is the most important factor in what they write. I have many decades of experiance looking at government data and first releases are almost never right. The final version, three or more months later, is going to be as good as it gets. The final (more acurate) values are almost always three months back.

Despite everything I do some of my posts are blocked on other social media web sites. So if you are interested in seeing what you are missing then you should follow my blog by getting a notice when a post goes live. On the right side of my blog are a series of informative windows and the fourth one down is where you enter an email and that will get you a message every time a post goes live. I normally post 10 to 12 items starting in the morning around 9:00 AM EST with a 10 minute intervals between them.