It is worse than this please take a look at my latest post https://centinel2012.com/2015/07/20/nasa-giss-table-loti-cannot-be-correct/ Comments and suggestions are welcome! Especially if you can show i am wrong!
By Paul Homewood
Last month, NOAA caused a lot of controversy by adjusting historic global temperature data to show that the pause had never happened. This has been well covered by WUWT and others, but what is less well known is that NOAA have been making similar but subtle adjustments year by year for a while now.
When they do this, the old versions are never archived, and they do not publically announce what they have done. Instead, the new figures simply replace the old version.
Fortunately, however, Walter Dnes has been archiving the old data each month since January 2010. His results were published at WUWT last week.
I have used his data to show in a simple fashion what the total effect of these changes since 2009 has been.
View original post 339 more words
Centinel2012 
Regretfully, you are right. Deceit started immediately after Stalin won WWII and united nations (UN) and national academies of science (NAS) into a worldwide “Orwellian Ministry of Consensus Science (UN)Truths“ on 24 Oct 1945
Current global climate doom was made possible by forty-three years (1972-2015) of hiding evidence our elements were made in the Sun just before birth of the solar system:
1972: Here are the experimental data that showed the presence of “strange xenon” (Xe-2) from synthesis of the chemical elements just before the primitive meteorites formed [Hennecke, Sabu & Manuel, Nature 240 (1972) 99-101 http://www.omatumr.com/archive/XenonInCarbonaceousChondrites.pdf
http://www.omatumr.com/Data/1972Data.htm
1975: Here are experimental data from the Allende meteorite showing that all primordial helium accompanied “strange xenon” (Xe-2) in the Allende meteorite and no primordial helium was associated with “normal xenon” (Xe-1) in the Allende meteorite.
http://www.omatumr.com/Data/1975Data.htm
1977: Here is a debate published in Science to decide if “strange xenon” (Xe-2) was produced by:
_ a.) A supernova explosion of the Sun
_ b.) Fission of a superheavy element
“Strange xenon, extinct superheavy elements, and the solar neutrino puzzle,” Science (14 January 1977)
Click to access StrangeXenon.pdf
The University of Chicago scientists finally admitted superheavy element fission was not the correct answer in 1980s, and in . . .
1983: We predicted the Galileo probe of Jupiter would observe “strange xenon” (Xe-2) there, confirming local element synthesis and the iron-rich Sun [“Solar abundances of the elements,” Meteoritics 18, 209-222 (1983) http://tinyurl.com/224kz4
1995: Here are experimental data from the Galileo probe of Jupiter’s helium-rich atmosphere showing “strange xenon” (Xe-2) in Jupiter.
http://www.omatumr.com/Data/1998Data.htm
1998: NASA retained the Galileo data until 1998, when the NASA Administrator was confronted while he being video recorded by CSPAN news. See Dr. Goldin’s live explanation for holding the Jupiter xenon data near the end of this 1998 video.
LikeLike