Is Bill Gates the Dark Lord?


COMMENT: You are right. A lot more people are starting to question Bill Gates and is he becoming the dark lord against our republics. He is not only elected, not even a medical doctor, and he is certainly no economist. He wants to dictate to the world and every person must be vaccinated?

PP

REPLY: My trouble with Bill Gates is his alleged reputation for being ruthless and devious in light of his positions which are inconsistent. He is fearful of overpopulation, wants CO2 to be zero, funding vegetarian enterprises, wants to chip everyone, and then is a climate change supporter. This makes no sense. Why would you want to vaccinate everyone in the world to live longer if you are afraid of overpopulation and climate change? This is like being long and short at the same time in the same market with the same size positions on both sides. This makes no sense! What is his true end game?

COVID-19 will now be part of the annual flu season. By keeping everyone locked down, this means if they are not exposed, this virus will be prolonged. About 50% of those in Germany have already been exposed and have proven to be naturally immune.  Is this a virus they have intended to reduce the elderly to eliminate the pension and social liabilities for the baby-boomers? Some see this as the goal to save socialism. Reduce the population of the elderly and start over subjugating the youth. Interesting theory.

We already have Microsoft calls home like ET (phone home) every time you open any program in Office. Its antivirus software was taking your programs and checking them on their servers. That is obviously a threat to proprietary software to send a copy up to their servers.

 

 

Why do we all have to be chipped? Microsoft is tacking everything we do already. They sell that information to target advertisements. Now we have numerous countries demanding full-time tracking of people because of this coronavirus which is no more lethal than the flu. There are proposals for Britain and Europe lurking in the background where everyone must be tracked. How does this impact tourism? How will an American go to Greece or Italy if they are not part of this tracking system? Is this were Gates’ chips come in? Are we looking at losing our freedom to travel, assemble, and to speak freely? Is this what so many people died for defending our freedom in all these wars since the American Revolution?

 

Honestly, it reminds me of the Minority Report where Tom Cruise has his eyes replaced because they have taken everyone’s retinal scan so they know who everyone is. If we are all chipped, does this scene become reality?

Apple and Google are making changes to their respective mobile operating systems to allow iOS and Android devices to use Bluetooth to detect and record when they come within 10-15 feet of any other iOS or Android device (provided its owner has opted in). If you use the app and anyone you’ve encountered later tests positive for coronavirus, your phone will alert you of that fact.

This will eliminate all privacy whatsoever. Big Brother will know where you are at any time and if you ever met with someone who was a dissident. In the days of Stalin, that meant death. Is there a move to track everyone because they know their Keynesian Financial System is collapsing?

Why is WHO Demanding Sweden Lockdown? Because They Show The Lockdown Makes no Difference?


 

It is very interesting that the death rate in Sweden is by no means excessive compared to any other Western country that has locked its citizens down. The only restrictions were on gatherings of 50 or more people, and advice such as over-70s being urged to stay at home. Swedish schools, shops, restaurants, and pubs all remained open.  Nevertheless, The World Health Organization (WHO), has been insisting that Sweden lock its people down. The corruption behind the WHO and how it is being dominated by Bill Gates is a matter of record. Sweden is demonstrating to the world that the lockdown is absurd and it has NOT prevented anything. Sweden is treating its population with respect, unlike the rest of the Western powers.

The problem is very clear. Sweden is proving that the lockdown insisted by Bill Gates is nonsenseand it has deliberately undermined the world economy, destroyed jobs, and is subjecting people to the loss of all privacy and liberty – but to what end? Is this a major socialist move to wipe out small business and then allow only state-run businesses or large corporations who donate to the Socialists for favored status to survive?

Something is just not right!

Reports are that the Swiss Also Locked Up A doctor for being Against the Coronavirus Fraud


China’s Bio weapon, and Pelosi


China’s Bio weapon, and Pelosi … By Bill O’Reilly Re-Posted from WAKE UP AMERICA on April 13, 2020

My wife Angie will tell you that I study history and world events fluently every day. I have studied China for many years. To get answers I need to questions, I call many I know in Washington on Capitol Hill (from my tenure on two Presidential campaigns and Presidential talks) and I ask them for straight up answers to better understand what affects us as a nation.

Well, in 2016 America elected a new Sheriff: Donald J Trump. For decades the Chinese walked all over America but the new President said “not anymore”. Trump literally strangled China’s economy to the point their economy was in its worst free fall ever. Trump negotiated a new 50 billion trade agreement. He had Xi by the proverbial balls. America’s economy was on fire and unstoppable. President Xi Jinping he could not beat the USA militarily and he knew any domesticated economic attack would fail as our economy was too strong. He had to act. But how?

Enter the USA democrats led by Pelosi and Schiff. Impeachment. A hoax. A distraction for our people and President. Xi Jinping his thugs see this. They aren’t stupid. They have very intelligent intellectual thinkers in their government. Now you must understand , the Chinese regime are truly Barbarians. Notice I did not say ALL CHINESE. The Chinese people are a good people. I enjoy my interactions with them.

The communist regime has millions of its own citizens slaving in gulags simply for speaking against the government or openly practicing Christianity. Knowing they could not attack us openly they needed to be coy, like a deceptive fox. In my opinion, I believe the regime released a biological weapon upon the world that doesn’t kill everyone, but kills “enough,” especially the elderly and in-firmed. Back in WW 2 Hitler thought the same way. He got rid of what he considered the useless and rejects of society.

Trumps task force uses models to figure things. Xi used and uses “models” too. China’s president figured that if he killed a few of his own (a few hundred thousand to them would be a few out of 1.4 billion people) and spread the virus to other nations (especially to the USA) they would “level the economic playing field” and not have fired a shot.

Losses of his own people were acceptable costs of a new war. When China’s own doctors attempted to sound the warning, they were immediately silenced. In fact one died and another has simply disappeared. Trump and the other allied leaders indeed KNOW this is what happened. They have under reported their own deaths. Trump knows he cannot outrightly seek retribution. His news conference today showed me this when he balked publicly about no outright retribution over Xi’s handling of this and he immediately brought up the “trade deal”. However, Trump wasn’t being weak, he too was now being coy. We know this was a biological weapon. The food market story is bullshit.

Xi knows we know it. Trump also today announced he sent two battle groups of destroyers and other ships to sea several days ago to fight drugs and rogue actors like Iran should they try anything.

I say he did this to show Xi he knows what has transpired (we have the greatest intelligence assets) and that they (the Chinese) should rethink further action. Politics is premier. We cannot overtly attack China for what they have done as we would also suffer greatly. We all know this.

But China has temporarily achieved its goal. America was literally consumed by Trumps phony impeachment brought by the ultra left democrats (supported by democrat rank and file and one Republican Mitt Romney) and Xi Jinping an opening. He took it. Xi did what Trump usually does…he walked onto the world stage and threw a grenade into the “room” and left. It exploded in the form of this worldwide pandemic. It brought the USA and the rest of the world to its knees and leveled the economic playing field.

Our economy is now near depression. Xi didn’t fire one bullet. Trump needed to up his game of chess and putting our Naval ships to sea was his next move. He said he is a “war” President. He is.

But now on not one but two fronts. One front is the virus and the other front is the Chinese. While the Saudi’s and Russians are screwing with oil prices they aren’t overtly doing what this pandemic is doing. The drug smuggling story for dispatching the Naval Force is bullshit and the world knows it. I am of the opinion Trump can indeed bring us back from this catastrophe albeit with a changed playing field.

But Trump is a genius in chess and financial matters. He’s become a champ at international politics too. I am sure Trump can once again lead the economy to even stronger strength and greatness the it was . He can do it quickly I’m sure of it. He has proved it. Xi Jinping to be sent a message loud and clear. NEVER AGAIN. We need to bring all of our critical manufacturing back from China beginning with our medicines they were recently threatening to withhold. We can do it immediately. Again, another reason for Trump putting to sea such a sizable Naval Force. Sending a clear message.

We all must ride out the next few weeks. Then we and the world pick up the pieces and move on. The democrats who have given Xi this opening wrapped in a bow must pay a heavy price in November as they (the democrats) truly have cost and continue to cost America precious lives by the phony scandals. Nancy Pelosi continues to help the Chinese by her daily shameless attacks upon the President and meddling in stimulus packages as she did this last weekend. Yesterday’s statements she made were truly appalling and the lowest of low. I didn’t think she could go any lower. What a disgrace she is to our nation.

But, Pelosi aside, make no mistake, China must and will be taught a lesson the likes they have never seen before and Trump is the man to pull the trigger.

We the people must teach the democrats the same lesson at the polls. They (the radical wing of the party) are the enemy of a free America. I am certain of it. The entire democrat party of our forefathers is dead. Remember people, Trump indeed tried to warn us all of the Coronavirus in his State of the Union Speech. He spoke of it. He said he was on top of it.

After he spoke , Nancy Pelosi ripped up the speech calling Trumps words “a manifesto of lies”. She disgraced the country and all of our fellow honored citizens present in the House Chamber. Well she now has American blood on her hands. She is very majorly responsible for these needless deaths as well as the Chinese. Her and Adam Schiff.

The left and democrats laughed as she tore up his speech. Well, as they laughed the disease he just spoke of in that speech came to our shores. Republicans and Democrats alike are now dying. Your family members and mine. Our grandparents and middle aged citizens alike. Bodies are being loaded in trucks with forklifts in Brooklyn outside of hospitals. No one is safe. Our liberty is for the most part suspended. As we bury our dead (without proper funerals) from this calamity let’s drive the nails into the coffin of the Democrat party as well in November.

It’s time people. Stand up for your rights and your country! Our Liberty and survival is at stake! I am praying for God’s blessing on our nation. But, God also gave us the ability to think for ourselves and it’s time we placed blame for all this death where it belongs: on the doorsteps of Nancy Pelosi, Adam Schiff and  Xi Jinping. Wake Up America.

WAKE UP!

Terms and Conditions – California Outlines Six Requirements Before Lifting Home Detainment and Reopening The Economy…


To get ahead of any federal guidelines allowing states to re-open their economy, Governor Gavin Newsom is outlining the terms and conditions for California. Please remember the key words that all totalitarian minds use in their language.  When you see the code-words: “challenge“, “opportunity“, “partner” or “support“, pay extra attention.

Governor Gavin Newsom and the government of California now outline six conditions and requirements that must be met before the government will lift the stay-at-home restriction and/or modify the California economic closure. [pdf Here]

California will not lift their lock-down orders until the government has:

(1) The ability to monitor and protect our communities through testing, contact tracing, isolating, and supporting those who are positive or exposed.

  • Do we have the ability to identify contacts of those who are positive to reduce further transmission?
  • Do we have the ability to test everyone who is symptomatic?

(2) The ability to prevent infection in people who are at risk for more severe COVID-19.

  • Are older Californians and the medically vulnerable living in their own homes supported [under surveillance] so they can continue appropriate physical distancing?
  • Have we developed a plan to quickly identify and contain outbreaks in facilities housing older Californians, those living with disabilities, those currently incarcerated, and those with co-morbidities?

(3) The ability of the hospital and health systems to handle surges.

  • Do we have adequate bed capacity, staff and supplies such as ventilators and masks?
  • Can our healthcare system adequately address COVID19 and other critical healthcare need?

(4) The ability to develop therapeutics to meet the demand.

  • Have we built a coalition of private, public, and academic partners to accelerate the development of therapeutics?
  • Have we identified potential therapeutics that have shown promise?

(5) The ability for businesses, schools, and child care facilities to support physical distancing.

  • Have we worked with businesses to support physical distancing practices and introduced guidelines to provide health checks when employees or the general public enter the premises?

(6) The ability to determine when to reinstitute certain measures, such as the stay-at-home orders, if necessary.

  • Are we tracking the right data to provide us an early warning system?
  • Do we have the ability to quickly communicate the need to reinstate these measures?

(LINK)

The publication of this decree is actually quite remarkable.  I was floored when I read it.

Notice within the six terms and conditions there is ZERO CONSIDERATION for rights of the individual.  Every condition is framed around the interests of the state.  The individual is literally framed as adverse to the interests of the state.

Please pause and allow yourself appropriate time to reflect on the seismic shift in this big government state outlook.  It doesn’t matter if you don’t want to be tested.

It doesn’t matter if you want to be contract-traced.  It doesn’t matter if you don’t want to be monitored. It doesn’t matter if you don’t want to be “supported”.

Your rights as an individual are dissolved by the state, where the state interests begin.

Again, re-read it.  There is ZERO consideration for rights of individuals.  All consideration, every consideration, is framed around the interests of the state.

Until the state government identifies and agrees that these specific state designated terms and conditions are met, all Californians are to remain under home detention; and all civil rights are suspended by order of the state.

Additionally, the state will only consider a limited amount of loosened the restrictions; and permit a modified amount of liberty; if, and only if, the state is assured to be able to immediately institute the rules of the original citizen confinement.   That means as long as the state fears they may not be able to accomplish this again… the current status will be retained.

They Say This In Writing !

.

The State of California is accomplishing this without even attempting to create a single law; or have a single representative vote… This is all being carried out by decree.

At the end of their presentation the California government admits things will forever be changed.  Restaurants will have new rules, less tables; citizens will be required to wear masks; and “new opportunities will likely arise to support mitigation.”

Big Brother Bill Gates


I keep thinking of the late Aaron Russo’s excellent video, “From Freedom to Fascism.” His video helped wake me up and if he were alive today he’d be very disappointed at how easily Americans have fallen lockstep in line with whatever big government ‘authorities’ tell them to do. We’ve now arrived at the Orwellian police state he warned us about.

Bill Gates is worth over $100 billion and like his fellow billionaire George Soros, he funds a great many organizations to help him reach his goal. Bill wants medical tyranny, which will result in eugenics.

Gates is neither a doctor nor an elected official, but his control over us is staggering. Gates funds globalist medical institutions such as the World’s Health Organization, headed by a communist revolutionary and close friend of China. Gates has many medical and pharmacological stooges working for him—including the diminutive Fauci, who helped make sure American taxpayer money went to fund the coronavirus research in Wuhan.

While the Covid-19 virus may be real and dangerous, it’s being way over-hyped and over-blown by the medical tyrants and the mass media, who drum a daily beat of fear into the heads of citizens. For decades, the globalists have used their climate change narrative as a means to make us all afraid. They wanted to make us feel bad for breathing, as if we all were some sort of cancer that was destroying their planet with fossil fuels. They wanted the Green New Deal to destroy our industry and economy, thus making it possible to usher in their vision of complete control over the populace by means of tracking, social credits, and digital currency.

The virus is working much better for them than their climate change bunk. They want to portray humans as a virus infecting the planet. THEIR planet. They own it. They see us as nuisance.

The very top of the pyramid, including Gates, owns and controls most everything and they want us fearful, masked, and content at losing our income and ability to socialize. Social distancing prevents protest. They certainly don’t want a repeat of “Occupy Wall Street.” Bear in mind there is no law that people can’t gather, but the police haven’t let that stop them. In many states, the cops are handing out huge fines and threats of jail time. Churches have been targeted. They want faith directed at Gates, not God.

So here we are. A squeaky-throated computer nerd named Bill Gates is now Big Brother. He expects the economic stranglehold to produce such fear and desperation that everyone will gladly take his vaccine and be digitally tracked.

Humans are NOT a virus. Resist the vaccine as if your life depends on it, because it will. Down with Big Brother!

—Ben Garrison

Does Corona Virus Task Force Star Dr. Fauci Want to be Fired?


Ignore Anthony Fauci rather than giving him the pleasure of firing him and put America back to work as soon as you possibly can

Judi McLeod image

Re-poted from the Canada Free Press By  —— Bio and ArchivesApril 13, 2020

Does Corona Virus Task Force Star Dr. Fauci Want  to be Fired?The Democrat-mainstream media gang-up cabal need President Donald Trump to fire disease expert-cum-publicity hound Dr. Anthony Fauci.

It seems that the good doctor not only wants to be fired, but is out there on CNN trying to get fired.

The trap being planned by the cabal is not so difficult to fathom: The immunologist needs the president to fire him so that he can add to the image of ‘Trump the Tyrant’.

Related:
• Does Corona Virus Task Force Star Dr. Fauci Want to be Fired?
• As Predicted, Dr. Tony Fauci Turned on President Trump, Making His Move on Easter Sunday
• End the Lockdown and Set The World Free, Mr. President!
• Call Birx & Fauci Out, Mr. President!
• Dr. Fauci: You Already Made Off With The Present, Quit Messing With The Future
• Save the Western World By Booting Ambassador Birx off the Corona Virus Task Force, Mr. President

Once fired, Fauci could remind us of the many times, the president lauded him as an “expert”, right on live stream TV and claim that he was only fired for trying to tell the truth.

Don’t go there, Mr. President whatever you do because that’s the story mainstream and social media breathlessly await to tell.

“President Trump sparked speculation about his relationship with the country’s top disease expert Sunday night after he retweeted a post that called for the doctor’s job. (Fox News, April 13, 2020)

“Trump used statements Dr. Anthony Fauci made in February as evidence that a recent New York Times report that said he was slow to act on the coronavirus outbreak was “fake news.”

“Fauci, the director of the National Institute of Allergy and Infectious Diseases, was asked about the report on CNN and admitted that earlier action could have saved more lives. The Times’ report said Trump played down the seriousness of the virus throughout January.

“DeAnna Lorraine, a former Republican congressional candidate, called out Fauci in her own tweet and said he told people in late February that “there was nothing to worry about and it posed no threat to the US public at large. Time to #FireFauci.”

“Trump seized on Lorraine’s tweet as evidence of “fake news,” from the Times.

“Trump implied that if there were widespread concerns about the virus in the White House in January, surely Fauci would have known in late February.

“Sorry Fake News, it’s all on tape. I banned China long before people spoke up,” Trump tweeted, before thanking One News Network. Trump’s tweet linked to Lorraine’s tweet that called for Fauci’s ouster.

“Fauci was on NBC News’ “Today” on Feb. 29, the date Lorraine mentioned, and talked about the “community spread” of the coronavirus. The virus, at that time, was known to be in Italy and China. Fauci was asked if Americans should change their way of life and he said, “there is no need to change what you are doing on a day-by-day basis.” But he said that could change.

“The New York Times reported this weekend that Trump played down the seriousness of the virus in January, even though experts in both his cabinet and intelligence agencies “sounded the alarm.”

“Trump called the Times’ story “Fake, just like the “paper” itself.”

“Trump has said that his decision to “close” the U.S. to China in early February was prescient, despite being panned in the media as “xenophobic.”

“Times has reported that Fauci has “grown bolder” in correcting Trump publicly and Fauci, in turn, “has become a hero to the president’s critics because of it.”

“Fauci, for example, has publicly played down Trump’s claim that hydroxychloroquine combined with an antibiotic could be a “game-changer” in the fight against the disease.

“Fauci was asked on CNN Sunday about the Times report on Trump playing down the threat.

“I mean. Obviously, you could logically say that if you had a process that was ongoing and you started mitigation earlier, you could have saved lives,” Fauci said on Sunday.

“He said the decision process is complicated but said “if we, right from the very beginning, shut everything down, it may have been a little bit different. But there was a lot of pushback about shutting things down back then.”

When it comes to saving lives from dreaded COVID-19, Fauci is the doctor, Donald Trump, the president who brought Doctors Fauci and Deborah Birx to the televised Coronavirus Task Force,  whose “mitigations” did not prevent the deaths of 22,000 Americans.

It is absurd that Fauci, touted as the “country’s top health expert” could fancy himself as an election expert.

‘Fauci ‘can’t guarantee’ physical vote in November will be safe’ (Fox News, April 13, 2020)

Of course he can’t and neither can the Democrats or media, though that’s what they’re now trying to do.

“…President Trump has spoken out unfavorably against mail-in ballots. (Fox News)

“It shouldn’t be mail-in voting,” Trump added. “It should be: you go to a booth and you proudly display yourself. You don’t send it in the mail where people can pick up. All sorts of bad things can happen … by the time it gets in and is tabulated.”

“Fauci told CNN that he did not want to sound “pessimistic.”

“There is always the possibility, as we get into next fall and the beginning of early winter, that we could see a rebound,” he said.

Wow, next fall or the beginning of early winter for a rebound, that’s optimism for you!

“A recent Fox News poll showed Trump’s job performance numbers at a record high. “Fauci has faced increasing criticism on conservative radio who see him as a career bureaucrat. (Fox News, April 13, 2020)

“Fauci has slammed the media in the past for attempting to “pit” him against Trump. He was asked in March about reports of their relationship being on the rocks.  He was asked on the radio show “Mornings on the Mall” about questions from the media and how they seem designed at times to “create a rift between you and the president.”

“The president has listened to what I’ve said and to what the other people who are on the task force have said,” Fauci said. “When I’ve made recommendations, he has taken them. He has never countered, overwritten me. The idea of just pitting one against the other is not helpful. I wish that would stop and that we’d look ahead at the challenge we have to get over this thing.”

How about you stopping, Dr. Fauci?

Mr. President, don’t fire the doctor allowing him to declare that you only fired him because he was telling the truth.

Ignore Fauci’s predictions that he “can’t guarantee” that it will be safe to physically vote at polls in November due to coronavirus.

Take all Obama holdovers, advising you—particularly any with a groupie mentality toward Hillary Clinton—with a grain of salt.

Ignore Anthony Fauci rather than giving him the pleasure of firing him and put America back to work as soon as you possibly can.

Democrats are once again blaming the President for circumstances and conditions that they helped create


Democrats, like some of their Republican counterparts, are globalists. They are the ones who should be blamed–not the President

Charles Wills image

Re-posted from the Canada Free Press By  —— Bio and ArchivesApril 13, 2020

Democrats are once again blaming the President for circumstances and conditions that they helped createBack in January, criminally insane Democrats called President Trump xenophobic for restricting travel between the U.S. and China, in the midst of a potential viral pandemic. After calling the President a racist and accusing him of overreacting to the spread of Covid-19, Democrats turned around and accused the President of not doing enough to stop the spread of the virus. Folks, Democrats and their media mouthpieces are not only sociopaths, they are total imbeciles as well.

President Trump wisely closed our borders to China and quickly added additional restrictions on travel to places like Iran and Italy

After their phony accusations of racism failed to catch on with the public, Democrats, who all have bats in the belfry, blamed the President for not allocating enough money to combat the spread of the virus. I would like to say, to all batty Democrats and their unscrupulous comrades in the media and Hollywood, that only Congress has the power to allocate money, you imbeciles.

Regardless of the accusations leveled against him, President Trump wisely closed our borders to China and quickly added additional restrictions on travel to places like Iran and Italy, where the virus was rapidly spreading. What were the Democrats doing while the President was taking action to protect the American people? They were busy running the phony impeachment scam and blaming the President for things they helped create.

According to Democrats and their media mouthpieces, it’s the President’s fault that there’s a shortage of surgical masks, gloves and respirators. According to them, the President should have stockpiled these things in advance. However, the previous administration didn’t stockpile medical provisions or make any preparations for a viral pandemic at all. If the previous administration had made preparations for a pandemic, we would have had warehouses full of surgical masks, gloves and respirators. They didn’t and we didn’t!

Besides that, the Center for Disease Control (CDC) failed to take the Wuhan virus seriously, and the World Health Organization (WHO) criticized the President for implementing travel restrictions in the wake of a growing pandemic. On top of that, both organizations have been assuring the world for years that a global pandemic, like the 1918 pandemic, was not likely because of vaccines and the mere presence of the CDC and the WHO.

If you believed the CDC and the WHO, the joke is on you!

If you believed the CDC and the WHO, the joke is on you! That’s why Dr. Seuss is quite appropriate for the two; the CDC and the WHO. They are both a joke! If the Coronavirus pandemic proves anything, it proves that both organizations, the CDC and the WHO, have serious problems. They both failed to recognize the threat of Covid-19 until it had spread throughout the world, and neither one had a stockpile of emergency medical provisions, although they both rake in millions of dollars each year from U.S taxpayers.

Furthermore, the panic buying, caused by the pandemic, quickly emptied store shelves by early March and has yet to be replenished, that’s proof enough that manufacturers do not have enough excess manufacturing capacity to respond to an emergency. However, instead of recognizing and addressing the problem, Democrats blamed the President for our crippled American industry.

Moreover, Democrats blamed the President because U.S. manufacturers are unable to produce and distribute products fast enough to fill demand, and restock empty shelves. The truth is that U.S. manufacturers adopted lean or “Just In Time” (JIT) manufacturing practices back in the 1970s. Under the lean model, manufacturers do not warehouse raw materials necessary to sustain or increase production. A specific amount of raw materials are delivered at specified times, through a supply line, “Just In Time” to keep production running at a constant level.

Just In Time (JIT) manufacturing does not respond well to a sudden increase in product demand

As a result, JIT manufacturing does not respond well to a sudden increase in product demand because it’s designed to eliminate warehouse and inventory expenses. Instead of warehousing raw materials needed for production, lean manufacturers rely on a supply line that globalization has stretched to the point that it’s extremely vulnerable to natural disasters and political turmoil. Simply put, when the supply line to China is disrupted, production in America comes to a halt.

In addition, the distribution system operates in much the same manner. Distributors only order enough products to fill open orders, and manufacturers only produce the exact amount of product ordered by distributors. Under normal conditions, if there’s a slight increase in product demand, the distributor simply back orders the product, and the manufacturer orders enough extra materials to fill that back order. That keeps the size of the distribution warehouse small and expenses at a minimum for the manufacturer.

However, when product demand vastly exceeds normal production, it takes time for manufacturers to acquire the additional raw materials necessary to increase production. To complicate matters, if there’s a disruption in the global supply line, then lean manufacturers can’t keep up with demand, let alone increase production, and stores quickly run out of paper products, surgical masks and other items. Proof of this can be found by looking at all the empty shelves in stores all across America.

There is no excess manufacturing capacity in America anymore

There is no excess manufacturing capacity in America anymore. The bad news is that stores will remain out of products until manufacturers can acquire the raw materials necessary to ramp up production, and that may take weeks or even months, depending on the number of manufacturers, length and capacity of the supply line, and the availability of raw materials.

Even worse news is that some products are no longer made in the U.S. because U.S. manufacturers moved to foreign shores in the wake of free trade globalism. Products made outside of America will take even longer to restock because the supply line has been taxed beyond capacity, and as long as demand outstrips production and distribution capabilities, we will have shortages of various things.

Finally, it’s not the President’s fault that American manufacturers expanded globally, adopted Just In Time manufacturing, and created global supply lines that are easily disrupted by natural disasters and political turmoil. Democrats are trying to blame the President for things that came about because of globalism. In short, Democrats are once again blaming the President for circumstances and conditions that they helped create. Democrats, like some of their Republican counterparts, are globalists. They are the ones who should be blamed—not the President.

Limitation of the President & Have the States Violated the Constitution Imposing a Lockdown?


(DOWNLOAD this Article: Commerce Clause.docx

QUESTION: Can Trump reopen the economy at will?

UT

ANSWER: There is no doubt that Americans have been getting a civics lesson as they turn to Washington for answers to the coronavirus crisis, but discover that their state governors have assumed far more control over what goes on in their daily lives than the constitution allows. It has been State and local authorities making decisions about shutting down businesses and allocating medical equipment to hospitals – not the President. They have merely listened to Bill Gates and the compromised Anthony Fauci whose recommendations are illegal.

This is what the “United States” meant that there was a separation of powers between federal and state. This is the system the founding fathers designed, though it seems anachronistic to many while people like Fauci have been the stooge for Bill Gates claiming this is a deadly disease that warrants we be locked-down as prisoners in our own homes without any legal authority under the Constitution.

It is the Commerce Clause in the United States Constitution (Article I, Section 8Clause 3) that governs this question. The Commerce Clause states that the United States Congress shall have power:

“[t]o regulate Commerce with foreign Nations, and among the several States, and with the Indian Tribes.”

The Supreme Court ruled in Swift and Company v. United States, 196 U.S. 375 (1905), that Congress had the authority to regulate local commerce, as long as that activity could become part of a continuous “current” of commerce that involved the interstate movement of goods and services.

My interpretation of this is simple. It is unconstitutional for any state to block interstate commerce. Consequently, the President has the executive power to issue a binding order to open up commerce and the states cannot legally resist that order for keeping the economy locked-down violates the Commerce Clause. Over the years, the meaning of the word “commerce” has been a source of controversy. The Constitution did not explicitly define the word. That has led to legal arguments back and forth.

Some argue that the word “Commerce” refers only to trade or exchange. Others counter that claim arguing that the Framers intended to describe more broadly commercial and social connections between citizens of different states. Hence, the interpretation of “Commerce” has been the dividing line between federal and state power. My reading is that they intended to prevent states from discriminating against each other and to ensure the free-flow of both the people with the freedom to travel and commerce in an economic sense.

In Gibbons v. Ogden, 22 U.S. 1 (1824), the Supreme Court held back then that intrastate activity could be regulated under the Commerce Clause, provided that the activity is part of a larger interstate commercial scheme. In Swift, as I said, the Supreme Court held that Congress had the authority to regulate local commerce provided it was part of a continuous “current” of commerce that involved the interstate movement of goods and services. Therefore, from 1905 until about 1937, the Supreme Court used this narrow version of the Commerce Clause. However, that changed with Franklin D. Roosevelt who stacked the court to justify his socialism and the New Deal. Beginning with NLRB v. Jones & Laughlin Steel Corp, 301 U.S. 1 (1937), the Supreme Court recognized broader grounds upon which the Commerce Clause could be used to regulate state activity since FDR was seeking more power to dominate the states.

The Supreme Court held in NLRB that activity was commerce if it had a “substantial economic effect” on interstate commerce or if the “cumulative effect” of a single act could have an effect on such commerce. Then in NLRB v. Jones, United States v. Darby, 312 U.S. 100 (1941) and Wickard v. Filburn, 317 U.S. 111 (1942), the Supreme Court revealed its socialist interpretation which broadened the scope of the Commerce Clause. Suddenly, what emerged was a highly dynamic and integrated national economy, whereby the Court applied its broad interpretation of the Commerce Clause, reasoning the even local activity will likely affect the larger interstate commercial economic scheme. The limitations between state and federal were no longer so clear.

After 1937 until 1995, the Supreme Court never invalidated a single law on the basis of the Commerce Clause. State’s rights seem to fade into the distant horizon. Then in 1995, the Supreme Court attempted to curtail this expansive interpretation of the Commerce Clause and was returning to a more conservative interpretation. This decision came down in United States v. Lopez, 514 U.S. 549 (1995). In Lopez, the defendant was charged with carrying a handgun to school in violation of the federal Gun-Free School Zones Act of 1990. The defendant argued that the federal government had no authority to regulate firearms in local schools, while the government claimed that this fell under the Commerce Clause, arguing that possession of a firearm in a school zone would lead to violent crime, thereby affecting the general economic conditions. The Supreme Court rejected that argument and held that Congress only has the power to regulate the channels of commerce, the instrumentalities of commerce, and action that substantially affects interstate commerce. The Court declined to further expand the Commerce Clause holding:

“To do so would require us to conclude that the Constitution’s enumeration of powers does not presuppose something not enumerated, and that there never will be a distinction between what is truly national and what is truly local. This we are unwilling to do.”

In Gonzales v. Raich, 545 U.S. 1 (2005), the Supreme Court returned to its more liberal construction of the Commerce Clause in relation to intrastate production. In Gonzales, the Court upheld federal regulation of intrastate marijuana production.

Then in 2012, the Supreme Court again dealt with the Commerce Clause in NFIB v. Sebelius, 567 US. 519 (2012) concerning the individual mandate in the Affordable Care Act (AFA), which sought to require uninsured individuals to secure health insurance (Obamacare) in an attempt to stabilize the health insurance market. Focusing on Lopez’s requirement that Congress could regulate only commercial activity, the Court held that the individual mandate could not be enacted under the Commerce Clause. The Court stated that requiring the purchase of health insurance under the AFA was not the regulation of commercial activity so much as inactivity and was, accordingly, impermissible under the Commerce Clause.

CONCLUSION

Therefore, relying on these decisions, the attempt by the states to lock-down the economy is UNCONSTITUTIONAL and the President has the power even under National Security to reopen the economy since it has been illegally shut down at the request of Bill Gates and his surrogate Anthony Fauci. This is dealing DIRECTLY with interstate commerce which is no different than protectionism that each state could then impose tariffs on imports from another state, which was the clear intention of the Founding Fathers to prohibit.

A Post From Germany


From Anonymous in Germany:

Dear Ladies and Gentlemen,

In Germany advocate, Ms. Beate Bahner went to the Supreme Court to question the denial of fundamental ground rights in the course of the coronavirus scam. Under the chair of judge  Stephan Harbarth the lawsuit was refused to be disputed. Judge Stephan Harbarth is a member of CDU of chancellor Merkel, was until 2018 a member of the Bundestag, and is known to be well linked to various industries in his home region of Baden-Württemberg. He wants to become President of the supreme court.

The story continued. Ms. Bahner gave her license as a lawyer back and declared that the constitutional state is dead, so there is no need for lawyers anymore. She asked people to stand up to make a stand, participate in demonstrations and civil disobedience.

Then her homepage was shut down by her provider. The following day Ms. Bahner registered a dark car entering her garage with two men sitting inside looking for her. She went for the street. There she asked people to help her, but nobody did drive her away or anything. Meanwhile, the police arrived. Ms. Bahner, a thin lady, was thrown to the ground and arrested with the hands behind her back, a treatment in Germany reserved for dangerous people. Then police did not mention the reason for this.

She was then transferred to the psychiatry of her hometown of Heidelberg and isolated in pitiful conditions like no toilet etc. The caretakers used force against her when she asked for basic care. Then she was informed, that she must stay there for at least 6 weeks because she is a danger not wearing a face mask. She was asked if she wants to stay there by free will. She denied this and asked for a hospitalization decision by an appointed judge. This decision was denied. But she got better treatment in a station with many real depressive patients etc., got a cellphone and could inform her sister who loaded this up to the internet.

In the press, many journalists are cheering this treatment (outstanding idiots, really), also many commentators are laughing about the “crazy lawyer”. Only a few have realized, what this could mean to themselves in the future.

Ms.Bahner said in the phone call, at least she feels safe in psychiatry, which I as an experienced MD can deny for sure. It is not sure to stay in the middle of the really crazy and dangerous people. So anything can happen anytime, as experienced Martin as well.

It makes me cry, if I think of my children. What world will this be? Can we hope that the politicians and Gates overstretch this and it collapses under the siege of civil unrest, war, and the end of civilization 2032?

I would prefer dying in the war than living in a society like this forever.

Please stay alive Martin

you give us some hope in the darkness

with all best wishes

GR