Nutty Nancy Pelosi Goes Completely ‘COUP-COUP’


Pelosi and Raskin are out there with media support trying to get rid of President Trump in COUP-COUP land

Judi McLeod image

Re-Posted from the Canada Free Press By Judi McLeod —— Bio and ArchivesOctober 9, 2020

Nutty Nancy Pelosi Goes Completely “COUP-COUP’Today’s New York Post headline is hilariously dead-on: Nancy Pelosi’s “COUP-COUP”!

“House Speaker Nancy Pelosi says her team is “going to be talking about the 25th Amendment” on Friday — the latest in a long line of nutty Democratic fantasies of getting rid of President Trump. (NY Post, Oct. 8, 2020)

“Pelosi, who hasn’t actually talked to the prez in months, claims to think he’s mentally off thanks to his COVID-19 treatments (or something). Yet she’s only exposing (again) Democrats’ own Trump Derangement Syndrome, because this potential coup is an obvious non-starter.

Unfortunately, Pelosi is not the only nutty Dem in public office

“Trump’s “disassociation from reality would be funny if it weren’t so deadly,” she claimed — just because he’s made his usual fast-changing threats and offers over the relief bill that Democrats have stalled in Congress.

“The 25th Amendment allows for temporary ouster of a disabled president, but it requires the active participation of a majority of his cabinet — or the Republican Senate’s assent to setting up some other body to rule on his fitness. The prez just gave an hour-long interview to Maria Bartiromo — pretty compelling proof that he’s clicking on all cylinders. And there is no provision for removing a president just because Pelosi is offended by his existence.”

At this morning’s press conference, she wore a blue and white face mask matching her electric blue dress.

Yet when she showed up at a local beauty salon for a dye job earlier this month, she wore a bare face.

“House Speaker Nancy Pelosi and Congressman Jamie Raskin are introducing a bill on Friday to form a commission that would rule on the president’s fitness for office in order to “enable Congress to help ensure effective and uninterrupted leadership” in the presidency. (CBS, Oct. 9, 2020)

“This panel, called the Commission on Presidential Capacity to Discharge the Powers and Duties of Office, would be “the body and process called for in the 25th Amendment to the U.S. Constitution,” Pelosi and Raskin’s offices said in a statement on Thursday.”

These days there’s a Commission on Presidential Everything—including a Commission on Presidential Debates that yesterday saw debate monitor Steve Scully checking in with former White House Director of Communications Anthony ‘Scare-a-Moochie’ to see whether he should respond to a Tweet by President Trump.

In his press conference with Pelosi today, Raskin used the term “government actors” the president could possibly infect with the Coronavirus.

Raskin was right.  There’s a lot of government actors running at large out there.

“At the press conference announcing the bill on Friday morning, Pelosi insisted that the bill was not intended to determine President Trump’s fitness of office.

“This is not about President Trump. He will face the judgment of voters. But he shows the need to create a process for future presidents,” Pelosi said.

“The 25th Amendment provides the procedure for the vice president to take over the duties of president in case of his death, resignation or inability to perform his duties. The amendment says that when the vice president and a majority either of Cabinet officials “or of such other body as Congress may by law provide” determine that the president is “unable to discharge the powers and duties of his office,” then the vice president shall take over the duties of president.”  (CBS)

Surely Pelosi, Raskin and Company are confusing the spitfire president with Joe Biden and the necessity of having to replace him with vice president Kamala Harris if the mail-in vote works and he is elected?

“The 25th Amendment is all about the stability of the presidency and the continuity of the office,” Raskin said in the conference announcing the bill, noting that it was ratified on a bipartisan basis after the assassination of President John F. Kennedy. (CBS)

WHOA, how did assassination get into the picture?!

“In the age of COVID-19, which has killed more than 210,000 Americans and now ravaged the White House staff, the wisdom of the 25th Amendment is clear,” Raskin continued, referring to the multiple White House officials who have tested positive for the virus. Raskin noted that the commission would be bipartisan, with members chosen by both Republicans and Democrats, and could only act in concert with the vice president. (CBS)

Sure, Congressman Raskin.

“Pelosi and Raskin’s introduction of the bill comes after President Trump was hospitalized over the weekend after testing positive for COVID-19, raising concerns about presidential succession. The White House said that Mr. Trump remained on the job even while he was at Walter Reed National Military Medical Center, and that there were no plans for Vice President Mike Pence to assume presidential authority. Mr. Trump returned to the White House on Monday, and returned to work at the Oval Office on Wednesday. (CBS)

“Raskin previously introduced a similar bill in 2017 to impanel a group of physicians and retired public officials to determine whether the president was mentally and physically fit for office.

“The 25th Amendment was adopted 50 years ago, but Congress has never set up the body it calls for to determine presidential fitness in the event of physical or psychological incapacity. Now is the time to do it,” Raskin said in a statement introducing the initial bill in May 2017.”

“Mr. Trump retweeted several posts on Thursday evening criticizing Pelosi for appearing to consider implementation of the 25th Amendment.”

The Dems are no longer “appearing” to consider implementation of the 25th Amendment, it’s now on the books. 

Meanwhile, Pelosi and Raskin are out there with media support trying to get rid of President Trump in COUP-COUP land.

Fantastic Research – Presidential Debate Commission Ideology Exposed – Chairman Connected to Soros, Color Revolution and Steele Dossier Group…


Posted originally on The Conservative Tree House on October 9, 2020 by sundance

Put this in the ‘things that make other things make sense‘ file, and give full credit to Revolver News for the research and citation assembly.

You might have seen Presidential Debate Commission Co-Founder Frank Fahrenkopf on Fox News last night trying desperately to explain and justify why the presidential debates were randomly modified to be a virtual format.

However, a terrific deep investigative dive into the background of Fahrenkopf and the people who make up the debate commission reveals a scale and scope of ideology that is almost jaw-dropping in sunlight; and that research completely explains how and why this group has supported far leftist candidates for decades.

“The nominally Republican Chairman of Presidential Debate Commission, Frank Fahrenkopf, is both a co-founder and current board member of the International Republican Institute (IRI), a top “Color Revolution” propaganda outfit. The IRI was run by Never Trump neoconservative John McCain for decades. It is closely linked to the thoroughly discredited Steele Dossier at the center of the Russia Hoax.”

 ~ Read Full Expose ~

You will want to bookmark that research. Suffice to say, after reading the background of the organization, the Presidential Debate Commission should no longer be considered a valid enterprise.  Unreal…https://platform.twitter.com/embed/index.html?creatorScreenName=thelastrefuge2&dnt=true&embedId=twitter-widget-1&frame=false&hideCard=false&hideThread=false&id=1314343118439882752&lang=en&origin=https%3A%2F%2Ftheconservativetreehouse.com%2F2020%2F10%2F09%2Ffantastic-research-presidential-debate-commission-ideology-exposed-chairman-connected-to-soros-color-revolution-and-steele-dossier-group%2F&siteScreenName=thelastrefuge2&theme=light&widgetsVersion=ed20a2b%3A1601588405575&width=550px

Share this:

C-SPAN Debate Moderator, Steve Scully, and Debate Commission, Claim Twitter Account Hacked…


Posted originally on The Conservative tree house on October 9, 2020 by sundance

As we previously noted, the October 15th presidential debate was scheduled to be moderated by Steve Scully, a former intern for Vice-President Joe Biden and a self proclaimed member of the “never Trump” resistance group.

Yesterday the senior political editor for CSPAN, Steve Scully, accidentally tweeted a public question to anti-Trump resistance member Anthony Scaramucci.  It appears the public tweet was a mistake during a private DM (direct message) conversation.

However, after Mr. Scully outed himself as a coordinating member of the resistance; and subsequently destroying the credibility of himself, his organization and the debate commission; urgent damage control was needed.  Today, Scully, C-SPAN and the Presidential Debate Commission are now claiming Scully’s twitter account was “hacked“.

WASHINGTON DC – C-SPAN host Steve Scully believes his Twitter account was hacked, the network announced in a statement Friday, in the aftermath of a tweet sent from his account to former White House Communications Director Anthony Scaramucci that raised questions of impartiality.

Scully “did not originate the tweet,” C-SPAN claimed, adding that the Commission on Presidential Debates was investigating the incident “with the help of authorities,” who were unidentified. Scully himself did not immediately comment.

Scully had been selected to host the second presidential debate, although the status of all future 2020 debates has been unclear. (more)

Perhaps the FBI will send 13 agents to help C-SPAN clean up this mess.

You decide…

Eyes + Ears = 50!


Do these idiots think that after watching this criminality for five months, any sane American will vote for a Democrat?

Joan Swirsky image

Re-Posted from the Canada Free Press By Joan Swirsky —— Bio and ArchivesOctober 10, 2020

Trump's Silent MajorityLast March brought us the results of the caucus and primary votes of the Democrat 2020 contest for the U.S. presidency. Out of a U.S. population of about 330 million—some stats include 40 million illegals, which brings the total to 370 million—the best Democrats had to offer was about 15 unimpressive candidates who the public saw through and sent packing. Left in the contest were:

  • Senator Bernie Sanders, an energized 78-year-old white, Jewish Marxist from Vermont, a keen admirer of Fidel Castro and Mother Russia—who represents his constituents as an Independent—who had recently survived a heart attack. 
  • Joe Biden, a 77-year-old, white, pro-abortion Catholic, former senator from Delaware for 36 years, VP of the U.S. for eight years under Barack Obama, and, even last March, clearly in the early-to-mid stages of dementia. 

But uh oh. When the DNC and Hillary & Co. saw the crowds that a feisty and passionate Sen. Sanders was attracting once again—and knowing that he would not obediently follow the agenda of the “insider” leftist-globalist-Islamist playbook they had been working to establish for decades—they once again, as they had four years earlier, engineered the ouster of Sanders in order to implant their exquisitely easy-to-manipulate candidate of choice: Joe Biden.

In short order, they garnered key endorsements, enlisted their media whores to omit any mention of “Jim Crow Joe’s” long and ignominious history of racism, and relied upon other career liars to camouflage the unmistakable cognitive decline of candidate Biden, which has worsened significantly over the past several months. 

IN THE MEANTIME

March was also the month when the China virus hit—“coincidentally” after the impeachment hoax imploded of its own fakery—and the Democrats realized that everything they had tried for four years to derail, actually to end, the Trump presidency had failed:

  • The Russian hoax—kaput!
  • The Ukraine hoax—a colossal failure.
  • The Stormy Daniels fiasco—a charade.
  • The Impeachment hoax—crashed and burned.

The China virus “pandemic” fit the Democrats’ plan perfectly—as did the “spontaneous” rise of the leftist-financed, five-months-long rampage through American cities of Black Lives Matter and Antifa, the rationale being that if “Trump’s America” was out of control, Biden’s America would make things better.

That is the same Joe Biden who echoed every word, philosophy and plan of action his old boss, Barack Obama, put forth, for instance Obama’s declaration to the American people that, “We cannot continue to rely on our military…we’ve got to have a civilian national security force that’s just as powerful, just as strong, just as well-funded.” 

According to writer Amil Imani, “Antifa and BLM are Obama’s ‘security force.’”https://lockerdome.com/lad/11136804967644006?pubid=ld-11136804967644006-671&pubo=https%3A%2F%2Fcanadafreepress.com&rid=canadafreepress.com&width=336

PSYCHOPATHOLOGY

And what have these “peaceful demonstrators”—as the corrupt media would like you to believe they are—done over the past five months to reassure the public that the Biden-Kalamity ticket is our country’s best path forward?

Fortunately for Trump supporters like me and millions throughout the country, these acting-out psychopaths have behaved so egregiously that they have literally insured a landslide reelection victory for POTUS MAGNUS!

That’s right, I said psychopaths. While the less menacing word for this species is sociopaths, they are one and the same. And the arch symptom of this pathology is a complete lack of empathy, the absolute inability to feel for another human being.

Reminds me of a song called “Nothing” from the musical A Chorus Line, with music by Marvin Hamlisch and the lyrics by Edward Kleban. 

And I dug right down to the bottom of my soul
To see what I had inside
Yes, I dug right down to the bottom of my soul
And I tried, I tried.

[And I felt] “Nothing, I’m feeling nothing”
They all felt something
But I felt nothing.

Over the past five months, Americans with their eyes wide open and ears perked, have witnessed the thugs of BLM and Antifa

Want proof? Over the past five months, Americans with their eyes wide open and ears perked, have witnessed the thugs of BLM and Antifa:

  • Rampaging through our city’s streets and avenues, smashing the massive plate-glass windows of banks and office buildings, apartments and medical facilities with tire irons and other weapons of mass destruction. 
  • Destroying gas stations, bodegas and supermarkets, and terrorizing suburban neighborhoods and private homes.  
  • Committing widespread arson by igniting both small and large businesses on fire till they burn to the ground.
  • Overturning cars and vans, buses and cabs, shattering their windows, ripping out their seats and ripping off their fenders and, again, lighting them on fire.
  • Inflicting savage bodily harm on old and young, black and white—throwing them to the ground, kicking them over and over again in their stomachs and heads, shooting blinding laser beams into their eyes, breaking their bones, all often resulting in hospitalizations in intensive-care units and also deaths.

EYES + EARS

I cannot imagine even one person in America watching this hate-fueled carnage, these blatantly illegal acts, and not asking himself or herself:
Do these bought-and-paid for goons not have parents, grandparents, aunts and uncles, siblings and friends who work in such businesses; who have spent blood, sweat, tears and often 25-hour days building such businesses; who depend on their work to pay their bills, care for their families? 

  • Of course they do—but they felt nothing!

Don’t these marauders know how painful it is to get kicked in the head, get the wind knocked out of you so you can’t breathe, see your skin peeling off from third-degree burns?  

  • Of course they do—but they felt nothing!

Don’t these domestic terrorists know how terrifying it is to have criminals shining flashlights into your home, threatening you and actually inflicting bodily harm, and making you afraid to shop in your own city?

  • Of course they do—but they felt nothing!

Do these idiots think that after watching this criminality for five months, any sane American will vote for a Democrat?

As if to emphasize their stone-cold natures, after they commit these crimes they dance and prance, laugh and high-five as if they’ve contributed something valuable to the world.  

And one more question: Do these idiots think that after watching this criminality for five months, any sane American will vote for a Democrat? 

After all, every single Democrat—including candidates Joe Biden and Kalamity—has uttered not one word of objection or condemnation while the beautiful cities of Seattle, Portland, Manhattan, Baltimore, San Francisco, Los Angeles, Chicago, Portland, Kenosha, et al., were being burned to the ground, their properties destroyed, their residents frozen in fear as they hear the anarchists’ chants of “Defund the Police” at a time when the heroic men and women in blue are more needed than ever.

Why? Because Democrats approved! So much so that Kalamity actually praised BLM during the recent VP-candidate debate!

It is no wonder that Ron Ross of Spectator.org writes that “Democrats have created scores of first-time Trump voters,” including parents, sports fans who detest seeing players insult the flag and national anthem, new gun owners, people fed up with coronavirus lockdowns, fracking fans who don’t want to see gas prices double, black and Hispanic voters who appreciate the employment offered by Trump’s booming—and now recovering—economy, the list is long.

By my computation, all this adds up to a 50-state rout for President Trump! Yep…eyes + ears = 50!

Duke’s First Rule of Politics: Under representative government, people do not get what they want. They get what they vote for


Shameful Moderator Bias at the Vice Presidential Debate


Selwyn Duke image

Re-Posted from the Canada Free Press By Selwyn Duke —— Bio and ArchivesOctober 8, 2020


Shameful Moderator Bias at the Vice Presidential DebateOne tragedy of this election season, as with all modern election seasons, is that the Democrats’ radicalism is being hidden from the American people by a complicit establishment media. It would have been nice, then, if Wednesday’s vice presidential debate could have been a teaching moment where light was shined on Kamala Harris’s and Joe Biden’s toxic positions. Unfortunately, moderator Susan Page’s bias made this impossible.

Page, USA Today’s Washington Bureau chief, made sure to inquire about how Judge Amy Coney Barrett’s confirmation to the Supreme Court would affect abortion, exhibiting the typical leftist obsession with prenatal infanticide. She asked Vice President Mike Pence how he thought his state of Indiana should legislate on the matter were Roe v. Wade struck down (I didn’t know he was again running for the Hoosier State’s governorship). This might be a fair question — that is, if Harris had been asked about her and Biden’s radical pro-prenatal infanticide positions. Harris supports “‘abortion on demand at any time, any where [sic], and under any circumstances,’” LifeNews.com quotes president of National Right to Life Carol Tobias as relating. And both she and Biden advocate taxpayer funding of prenatal infanticide.

The point is that Pence’s and President Trump’s abortion policies align far more closely with the electorate’s wishes than does the Democrat ticket’s radicalism. But the American people couldn’t learn this truth on Wednesday — thanks, largely, to Susan Page.

That’s just the iceberg’s tip, too. This is by far the most radical Democrat presidential ticket — representing well its extremist party — to ever seek the White House. For example, here are more pressing matters a smart, diligent, responsible moderator would have inquired about at the debate:

  • Harris cosponsored, and Biden has promised to sign into law, the misnamed “Equality Act,” which would compel schools to allow boys to compete in girls’ sports. This is unsurprising, as the Left has been all in on the so-called “transgender” agenda, calling it bigotry to deny men access to women’s bathrooms. Why, Harris even sent a message to Sexual Devolution activists in the debate, using the phrase “every gender” in a response. (How many are there? Answer: two sexes.) This agenda’s radical demands are extremely unpopular with Americans. Yet Harris wasn’t asked about it — thanks to Susan Page.
  • Last April, Harris threatened to bypass Congress and infringe on gun rights via executive action. She said last September that she supported a “mandatory buyback” (read: confiscation) of certain semi-automatic rifles. Again, where was the debate question about these unpopular proposals?
  • Neither Biden nor Harris has ever condemned terroristic Black Lives Matter or Antifa. In fact, the domain Antifa.com still redirects to the Biden/Harris campaign page (as of this writing). Doesn’t this warrant a question, Susan Page?

Additionally, Harris “thinks Catholics are not fit to serve on the Supreme Court, has tried to criminalize climate-change denial and the manufacture of guns…and, as California’s attorney general, wielded power like a callous autocrat,” asserts the New York Post. https://089b9e0768577d16a39ea00da9741841.safeframe.googlesyndication.com/safeframe/1-0-37/html/container.html

Of course, asking about such things would make the Democrats look bad — but only because that badness is a reality. There also is no corresponding radicalism on the other side; Trump’s and Pence’s policies very much align with the people’s will, and more closely with Truth, while Biden’s and Harris’s policies are generally antithetical to both.

It would be nice if the American people could learn this, which brings me to maddening Republican stupidity: Why does the GOP continually agree to have leftist debate moderators? In the least, there should be two moderators, one Republican and one Democrat, with each choosing 50 percent of the questions.

As for Page, people can argue about the degree to which her bias is conscious (she is, after all, operating above her pay grade, lacking the necessary self-knowledge and wisdom to do her job). Regardless, the result is the same: Biden and Harris are allowed to retain their masks and hide their true faces from Americans.

Speaking of which brings to mind Duke’s First Rule of Politics:

Under representative government, people do not get what they want. They get what they vote for.

And Susan Page and most mainstream media, being on the Democrats’ page, make this a sure thing.

Kamala Harris’ List of Lies During Debate


Re-Posted from politicalpistachio.blogspot.com Thursday, October 08, 2020

By Douglas V. Gibbs
Author, Speaker, Instructor, Radio Host

Either she’s an idiot, a conniving liar, or not very well informed.  

Kamala Harris was full of lies during the 2020 Vice Presidential Debate.  Let’s go over them.

► Lie: 210,000 dead people in our country in just the last several months (due to COVID-19).

Truth: CDC admitted numbers are being padded and that actually only 9,210 have died due to COVID-19 alone.

► Lie: Frontline workers that have been treated like sacrificial workers?

Truth: After seeing what was happening to frontline emergency workers in Italy, the Trump administration took early action to work to ensure that kind of problem did not happen in the U.S.

► Lie: Over 30 million people filed for unemployment during the last month.

Truth: Department of Labor reports about between 837,000 and 879,000 new initial claims each of the weeks September, which adds up to less than 4 million new claims for the month.  The report further explains the total number of people claiming benefits in all programs for the week ending September 12 was 26,529,810, an increase of 484,856 from the previous week.  It is also likely that a considerable amount of those who are on unemployment are more likely as a result of shut-down orders by Democrat Governors in Blue States than any action taken by the Trump administration.

► Lie: In January the Trump administration knew the dangers of the coronavirus and did not tell the American Public…imagine if you knew on January 28th? … they knew and they covered it up.

Truth: January 3: CDC Director Robert Redfield sent an email to the director of the Chinese CDC, George Gao, formally offering to send U.S. experts to China to investigate the coronavirus.

January 5: CDC Director Redfield sent another email to the Chinese CDC Director, George Gao, formally offering to send U.S. experts to China to investigate the coronavirus outbreak,

January 6: The Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (CDC) issued a level I travel notice for Wuhan, China due to the spreading coronavirus.

January 7: The CDC established a coronavirus incident management system to better share and respond to information about the virus.

January 11: The CDC updated a Level 1 travel health notice for Wuhan, China.

January 17: The CDC began implementing public health entry screening at the 3 U.S. airports that received the most travelers from Wuhan – San Francisco, New York JFK, and Los Angeles.

January 20: Dr. Fauci announces the National Institutes of Health is already working on the development of a vaccine for the coronavirus.

January 21: The CDC activated its emergency operations center to provide ongoing support to the coronavirus response.

January 23: The CDC sought a “special emergency authorization” from the FDA to allow states to use its newly developed coronavirus test.

January 27: President Trump tweeted that he made an offer to President Xi Jinping to send experts to China to investigate the coronavirus outbreak.

January 27: The CDC issued a level III travel health notice urging Americans to avoid all nonessential travel to China due to the coronavirus.

January 27: The White House Coronavirus Task Force started meeting to help monitor and contain the spread of the virus and provide updates to the President. 

January 29: The White House announced the formation of the Coronavirus Task Force to help monitor and contain the spread of the virus and provide updates to the President. 

January 31: The Trump Administration: Declared the coronavirus a public health emergency.

 Announced Chinese travel restrictions.

Suspended entry into the United States for foreign nationals who pose a risk of transmitting the coronavirus.

Source: https://www.donaldjtrump.com/media/timeline-the-trump-administrations-decisive-actions-to-combat-the-coronavirus/ 

► Lie: The President said it [the coronavirus] was a hoax.

Truth: Even the Associated Press indicated that the Biden Camp claiming Trump said the coronavirus was a hoax was not true.  He was calling their politicization of it their “latest hoax.”

► Lie: “You know this administration took the word ‘science’ off the website?”

Truth: The word “science” was not scrubbed from U.S. government websites by the Trump Administration, and that fact was even confirmed as not true by liberal left NBC News.

► Lie: They still don’t have a plan.

Truth: Trump administration’s plans regarding coronavirus began out the gate at a time the Democrats were claiming the alleged virus was nothing to worry about.

► Lie: Donald Trump paid $750 in taxes.

Truth: The Washington Examiner reports that “most, if not all, of the facts appear to be inaccurate” in The New York Times’ reporting regarding Trump’s taxes.  The Times’ reporting also ignores that the President paid $7.4 million in federal taxes in 2017, not $750.

► Lie: [Donald Trump] passed a tax bill benefiting the top 1% and the biggest corporations of America.

Truth:  Fact Check dot org explains that the claim is out of context, and not necessarily true.  The plan to cut taxes wound up reducing the tax burden for just about everyone across the board.  Later in the debate Harris claims they plan to only raise the taxes for people making $400,000 per year or more after Pence claimed Biden supports raising everyone’s taxes.  Even if Kamala’s claim is true, and the increase of taxation will only affect the top earners, the tax burden would largely land on those who own businesses, or are high ranking persons in these corporations, who do the hiring, and who adjust prices of their products based on the company’s cost to do business.  So, Biden’s plan would reduce hiring, and pass the tax on to the average workers (and newly unemployed) with higher prices of products … an economics lesson they have apparently never understood.

► Lie: Trump’s tax cuts led to a two trillion dollar deficit.

Truth: After the tax plan, because of the growing economy as a result of the tax cuts, federal tax revenue increased.  According to the Institute for Policy Innovation, “federal revenue has consistently increased in the years after the Trump tax cuts. Despite the enormous tax cut, federal revenue increased by $10 billion in 2018, by $130 billion in 2019, and was projected to grow by even more in 2020 before the Covid-19 pandemic and its economic effects.”  

► Lie: Joe Biden will only raise taxes on those who make more than $400,000 per year.

Truth: The Tax Foundation concluded Biden’s plan would lead to higher taxes “across all income groups.”

► Lie: Trump’s investment in infrastructure never happened.

Truth:  President Trump released an infrastructure plan more than two years ago.  Congress, specifically the Democrats in the House of Representatives, have blocked his call to invest in our infrastructure.  In February 2018, President Trump unveiled a plan to spur $1.5 trillion in new infrastructure spending.  The President included his infrastructure plan in both his FY 2019 and his FY 2020 budgets.

► Lie: Trump’s tax plan led American companies to go offshore to do their business.

Truth:  Common sense indicates that if they got the tax breaks Harris claims the big corporations got, they wouldn’t take their businesses off shore.  They’d stay where the tax breaks favor them.  Therefore, without even having to go very deep, it is obvious her statement contradicts earlier statements.  That said, in 2012 the Washington Post was very critical of the Obama administration for the number of jobs under his watch going overseas.  During the Trump presidency not only has Trump brought back jobs from overseas, a list that includes some very high-profile companies, but by March of 2019 the boost of manufacturing jobs in the U.S. had leaped 399%.

► Lie: Joe Biden will not end fracking.

Truth: Biden has not only said he plans to end fracking, but he plans to end fossil fuel consumption in America.

► Lie: Affordable Care Act brought health care to over 20 million Americans.

Truth: According to the Census Bureau, the number of uninsured Americans has been on the rise since the creation of the Affordable Care Act.

► Lie: Trump is working to take away protection for those with pre-existing conditions.

Truth: President Trump has signed an executive order designed to, in addition to other things, protect those with pre-existing conditions.  President Trump has made protecting “all pre-existing conditions” a key point in his second term agenda.

► Lie: The West Coast of the United States is burning, the East Coast is being battered by storms, Iowa crops destroyed because of floods, Joe believes in science (in discussion about Climate Change) … “an existential threat to us as human beings.”

Truth: Fires in west largely due to poor forest management.  Science has shown that the number of hurricanes and the severity of the storms has not increased.  University of Newcastle’s (UON) fresh research found further evidence to support the notion that severe flooding events occur cyclically, challenging the widely approved assumption that floods occur randomly, or that any change in flooding could be due to the notion of man-made climate change.

► Lie: “The Vice President earlier referred to what he thinks is an accomplishment that the president’s trade war with China. He lost that trade war. You lost it.”

Truth: One of the things Americans appreciate about President Trump is that he stands firm against those who would stand against American Liberty and American Prosperity. China is one such adversary. Therefore, President Trump has confronted China’s unfair trade practices.  His administration has “successfully used tariffs to persuade China to sign a Phase One Trade Agreement that secured significant protections for American workers and businesses.”  In addition to that, he got the Chinese communists to purchase an additional $32 billion in U.S. farm goods over the next two years.

► Lie: America lost 300,000 manufacturing jobs because of Trump’s trade war with China.

Truth: As of two years ago, according to Forbes, manufacturing jobs in the U.S. has increased ten times what it was during the Obama administration, thanks to Trump’s policies.  Numbers have not boomed so loudly since then, but that is largely due to Democrat policies by States regarding the coronavirus scamdemic.

► Lie: The Obama-Biden Administration created within the White House an office that basically was responsible for monitoring pandemics. They [Trump] got rid of it

Truth: Multiple sources have claimed this is not true; Former NSC Senior Director Tim Morrison, Former NSC staffer Richard Goldberg, Former National Security Adviser John Bolton, and even the leftwing rag, USA Today.

► Lie: “Look at the Iran nuclear deal [regarding Trump ending it] which now has put us in a position where we are less safe because they are building up what might end up being a significant nuclear arsenal.”

Truth:  Actually, the deal was designed to make it easier for Iran to achieve a nuclear arsenal.  By ending the deal and increasing sanctions on Iran which has adversely affected their economy, Trump has helped quell the danger that Iran once posed during the Obama administration.

► Lie: Trump referred to severe head injuries suffered by military personnel as simply “headaches”.

Truth:  President Trump was simply referring to what he had heard in a report. He said, “I heard that they had headaches and a couple of other things, but I would say, and I can report, it is not very serious.”  If he had been misinformed, that is not the President downplaying the head injuries suffered by military personnel. Reports later confirmed that at least 11 U.S. soldiers had been airlifted from Iraq to medical centers in Germany and Kuwait for further evaluation and treatment of possible traumatic brain injuries from the rocket attack.  When later asked about his “headaches” response in light of the new information, he stated he had been advised of the details “numerous days later,” and that regarding the severity of the injuries “you’d have to ask the Department of Defense.”  Later, he stated that “No, I don’t consider them very serious injuries relative to other injuries that I’ve seen. I’ve seen what Iran has done with their roadside bombs to our troops. I’ve seen people with no legs and with no arms. I’ve seen people that were horribly, horribly injured in that area, that war. In fact, many cases those bombs [were] put there by Soleimani, who’s no longer with us.”  The average person does not recognize how severe a traumatic brain injury can be because they can’t “see” it.  If President Trump does underestimate the seriousness of a head trauma, he’s not alone, and the list of those who don’t give a traumatic brain injury enough credence includes a long list of medical personnel in the Veteran’s Administration system.  I know this personally.

► Lie: Trump referred to our personnel in the military as “suckers and losers”.

Truth: Multiple witnesses not only state that Trump never said the “suckers and losers” remark, but that he didn’t even have a chance to visit the cemetery in question on the day he allegedly said such remark due to bad weather.

► Lie: Russia put bounties on the heads of American Troops.

Truth: Any evidence regarding the claim is based on uncorroborated evidence, which has been echoed by many persons in the federal government, including Defense Secretary Mark Esper.

► Lie: “In 1864 … Abraham Lincoln was up for re-election, and it was 27 days before the election. And a seat became open on the United States Supreme Court. Abraham Lincoln’s party was in charge not only of the White House but of the Senate. But Honest Abe said that it’s not the right thing to do.”

Truth: According to National Review:  Lincoln, of course, said no such thing. He sent no nominee to the Senate in October 1864 because the Senate was out of session until December. He sent a nominee the day after the session began, and Salmon P. Chase was confirmed the same day. And Lincoln wanted to dangle the nomination before Chase and several other potential candidates because he wanted them to campaign for him. Lincoln’s priority was winning the election, which was necessary to win the war — and he filled the vacancy at the first possible instant.  Kamala Harris is simply inventing history.

► Lie: Packing the Supreme Court.

Truth: While Harris and Biden have essentially dodged the question about packing the Supreme Court, and Harris tried to make it seem like it was not something she would consider during the debate, Harris in the past has indicated that she is open to the idea.

► Lie: [Trump] has refused to condemn white supremacists.

Truth: This old claim by the liberal left Democrats has been debunked repeatedly.  President Trump said during the first debate, “I’m prepared to do it”.  He has repeatedly and specifically denounced white supremacists and racist hate groups.  He did it in 2016, he said it in August of 2017twice.  And in August of 2019 Trump specifically said, “In one voice, our nation must condemn racism, bigotry, and white supremacy. These sinister ideologies must be defeated. Hate has no place in America.”

► Lie: “He called Mexicans rapists and criminals.”

Truth: This same claim was made during the Vice Presidential debate in 2016, as well.  Breitbart reported, back then, In his June 16, 2015 speech announcing his run for the presidency, Donald Trump said the following:  When do we beat Mexico at the border? They’re laughing at us, at our stupidity. And now they are beating us economically. They are not our friend, believe me. But they’re killing us economically.  The U.S. has become a dumping ground for everybody else’s problems.  Thank you. It’s true, and these are the best and the finest. When Mexico sends its people, they’re not sending their best. They’re not sending you. They’re not sending you. They’re sending people that have lots of problems, and they’re bringing those problems with us. They’re bringing drugs. They’re bringing crime. They’re rapists. And some, I assume, are good people.

Trump was referring to “some” of the people mixed into the population of illegal aliens crossing the border.

► Lie: He [Trump] instituted as his first act a Muslim ban.

Truth: The first list of countries on the first “travel ban” was based on a list of “countries of concern” compiled by the Obama administration.  In later executive orders regarding the travel restrictions North Korea and Venezuela were added, adding to the reality that the policy was less about Islam, and more about threats to the United States.

► Lie: Regarding racists and white supremacists at Charlottesville, when asked about it, Trump said they were fine people.

Truth: This has been fact-checked and debunked a number of times.  When taken into full context, he was saying that among the people in Charlottesville, while some were neo-nazis and white supremacists, among the crowds were also fine people.

► Lie: “I was the first statewide officer to institute a requirement that my agents would wear body cameras and keep them on full-time.”

Truth: As California’s Attorney General, Harris did not mandate body cameras statewide.  In fact, in 2015, Harris said that she did not believe in statewide standards for police body cameras.

► Lie: Trump will resist a peaceful transition of power.

Truth: It has been the Democrats who have stood against a peaceful end to the election.  Hillary Clinton told Biden not to concede, no matter what, for example.  The Democrats had trouble enough accepting the results of the 2016 election, and some may say they have still not accepted those results.

► Lie: “If we use our voice, we will win, and we will not let anyone subvert our democracy with what Donald Trump has been doing, as he did on the main stage last week, he openly attempted to suppress the vote.”

Truth: Harris was likely referring to Trump’s comments regarding keeping an eye open at the polls because of his concern regarding voter fraud.  These are the same Democrats who believe that Voter ID laws are also an attempt to suppress the vote (rather than guard against fraud), even though they are fine with requiring identification to be shown in order to enter Democrat Candidate townhallsfor DNC delegates to vote, or to enter and vote in labor union meetings.  Trump was not trying to suppress the vote, he was indicating he wishes the election to be honest, without fraud.  But, if fraud is going on, it ought to be reported.

Political Pistachio Conservative News and Commentary

President Trump Full Interview With Maria Bartiromo…


Posted originally on The Conservative Tree house on October 8, 2020 by sundance

Earlier this morning our president called-in to Fox Business for an extensive interview with Maria Bartiromo.  President Trump covered a multitude of topics from the ongoing election, to the debate changes, to the efforts to get the intelligence community to declassify documents related to his three-years of targeting by deep state officials.

Share this:

Here We Go – Tripwire Crossed: DC Debate Commission Announces “Virtual Debates” Without Consulting Campaigns…


Posted on The Conservative Tree House on October 8, 2020 by sundance

In March 2020, even before the DNC nominee was selected, CTH noted one of the important objectives for the use of the COVID-19 fear would be to protect their candidate through the use of the “virtual debate” format.

After the DNC club installed Joe Biden as the avatar for the Obama/Clyburn/Perez objective, again IN JUNE, we shared the presidential debate format would require deployment of “virtual debates”.

Quite simply, a cognitively impaired candidate cannot be relied upon to deliver a debate performance, so everything must be controlled.  {Go Deep}  Including mail-in voting.

The fact the presidential debate commission would not first approach the Trump or Biden campaign, prior to their announcement of “virtual debates”, is evidence of the commission corrupt intent:

(New York Times) […] The debate commission, which did not respond to repeated requests for comment, did not consult with the Biden and Trump campaigns before announcing the virtual format early on Thursday. The decision came after members of the commission’s production team objected to the safety risks of staging another in-person event at an indoor venue, according to a person familiar with its deliberations.

The contretemps on Thursday may pose the most significant test to the debate commission’s legitimacy since the group, a nonpartisan body, was founded in 1987. (more)

President Trump Reponds below.https://www.youtube.com/embed/OSOV1csyWsM?version=3&rel=1&fs=1&autohide=2&showsearch=0&showinfo=1&iv_load_policy=1&wmode=transparent

Share this:

NBC Caught Again Manipulating Joe Biden Town Hall With Planted Audience and Advance Script…


Posted originally on The Conservative Tree House on October 7, 2020 by sundance

The Washington Free Beacon has done a great job exposing the intentional and manipulative intents of NBC and Lester Holt during a recent town-hall event with presidential candidate Joe Biden.  At this point American media have become Pravda in their efforts to manipulate the outcome of the 2020 election. Video Recap

.Essentially what NBC did was present a pre-vetted pro-Biden audience to masquerade as independent or ‘swing voters’, and then roll-out a highly coordinated TV event as if it was occurring without a script.  The problem for NBC is their brazen hubris, because the people they used in the audience as voters previously appeared on sister network MSNBC.

[Read Full Expose’ Here]

Mexican President Notes Central American Caravan Timed to Interfere With U.S. Election…


Posted originally on The Conservative tree House on October 2, 2020 by sundance

There are trillions at stake…

As a consequence there are a myriad of ideological efforts underway, simultaneously with increased intensity, intended to influence the 2020 election.  Pelosi/Soros Inc. working earnestly on mail in ballots. Big Tech continues efforts to disconnect the voices of their political opposition.  Big Media continues efforts to frame anti-Trump narratives to assist their political allies.  The big Wall St. multinationals, including the U.S. Chamber of Commerce, are pouring money into efforts to block the re-election of President Trump.

Foreign money is pouring in from China and overseas interests who are negatively impacted by the America First national economic agenda. Regional politicians and their various special-interest groups are being funded to keep fueling antagonisms; and Hollywood influencers are ‘all-in‘ once again to assist the effort.

We can all see it; this time they are not trying to hide… Eyes wide open.  Cue the coordination with the open-border immigration lobby:

GUATEMALA CITY/MEXICO CITY (Reuters) – Mexico’s president on Friday said he suspected political interference behind a new migrant caravan in Central America, promising to keep his country out of the U.S. presidential race as the group splintered and some began turning back.

More than 2,000 migrants, many wearing face masks against the coronavirus, barged past Guatemalan troops at the Honduras-Guatemala border on Thursday. Some said they were seeking to escape poverty aggravated by the pandemic.

President Andres Manuel Lopez Obrador, who has taken steps to curb illegal immigration so as to avoid entanglements with his U.S. counterpart Donald Trump, suggested that the caravan’s departure from Honduras had been timed to provoke.

“It is very weird, very strange,” Lopez Obrador told a news conference. “It’s a matter that I believe is linked to the U.S. election.”

He said he did not have definitive evidence to support that claim, but his words turned up pressure on the migrants. (read more)

Obama speaking at National Council of La Raza