Liberate America by Turning the Political Pain up to 11


Now it is time to take the country back: It is time to turn the pain for despotic politicians up to 11

Matthew Vadum image

Re-posted from the Canada Free Press By  —— Bio and ArchivesApril 15, 202Cover Story | 

The late Sage of Baltimore, H. L. Mencken, once wrote, “Democracy is the theory that the common people know what they want, and deserve to get it good and hard.”

Polling suggests that America’s governors and mayors have done the terrified, beaten-down people’s bidding after saturation media coverage of panic-inducing epidemiological modeling made Americans strangely docile.

Counting COVID-19 deaths adopted during this pandemic had been corrupted by politics

If a poll released by Zogby Analytics on April 10 is to be believed, a supermajority of likely voters are fine with the lockdowns—and perhaps the harsh un-American tactics—used by states and localities to secure compliance with their emergency fiats aimed at the Chinese novel coronavirus that causes the occasionally deadly disease COVID-19.

According to the polling firm, social distancing policies enjoy bipartisan support, while 84 percent of “likely voters at least somewhat support federal, state and local governments telling Americans that they can’t go to work to help prevent the spread of COVID-19.”  The older you are, the more likely you are to support the lockdowns.  Only 889 likely voters were polled.

Even if we assume the poll results reflect reality, they are almost three weeks old; the survey ran from March 24 through 26.

Death forecasts since then have been drastically revised downward and the public mood seems a little less bleak.

Peak Fear is probably behind us.

Three weeks ago, re-opening the country was barely on the radar as the nation attempted a partial trial run of the Green New Deal and do-gooder snitches started turning America into East Germany.  Back then Americans, shocked and awed into becoming couch potatoes, were still struggling to figure out how to wear face masks to the grocery store, if only they could find them.

Most of us hadn’t figured out yet that the method of counting COVID-19 deaths adopted during this pandemic had been corrupted by politics, designed to maximize the COVID-19 body count.  Nor did many know about the relative arbitrariness of the death certification process itself that predates the virus by many years.  (See my April 9 American Thinker column, “The CDC Confesses to Lying About COVID-19 Death Numbers”)

It is time to turn the pain for despotic politicians up to 11

But today, searching for a way out of the lockdown and reopening America is being widely discussed, in part because President Donald Trump and other public figures, including governors and local leaders, have begun talking about it in earnest.  Even law-and-order conservatives have been appalled at reports of heavy-handed actions by overzealous police officers who have been saddled in many jurisdictions with poorly drafted enforcement instructions.

My guess is support for our collective national suicide attempt and the sick coercive egalitarianism behind locking up everyone for the benefit of a vulnerable sliver of the population has been steadily falling off since the Zogby poll was conducted.  Since then, joblessness has been shooting up, businesses large and small have been collapsing, and people have started thinking long and hard about what the future holds.  (See my March 27 American Thinker column, “Dictatorship of the Immunocompromised?”)

Now it is time to take the country back.

Don’t accept the silly argument I keep hearing that it is too difficult to determine who “the vulnerable” are in order to isolate them and let Americans get back to work.  Politicians wrote their emergency edicts, some of which are incredibly detailed, quickly, not wanting to be blamed if mass death followed.  Figuring out who the people are who still need to be shielded from the Chinese contagion and balancing competing interests in society while making a plan for the liberation of the country has to be easier than policing an America that has been turned into a minimum-security prison.

It is time to turn the pain for despotic politicians up to 11, to borrow a phrase from This Is Spinal Tap (1984).  Send emails, melt down telephone switchboards at all levels of government, visit lawmakers, write letters to the editor, make videos on social media, and in general make your views known.  Put pressure on politicians, including, yes, President Trump, who despite his strong leadership has inexplicably surrendered so much of his bully pulpit to unelected bullies like Dr. Anthony Fauci.

The politicians are listening and they’re beginning to get worried.  They took draconian steps because it’s what they thought you wanted.

Now you need to correct that impression if you want your God-given freedoms back.

Sixth Avenue near Rockefeller Center almost deserted last week (YouTube screen grab, cropped)

Those who do not learn from history…


Pandemic, Civil unrest, Rise of socialism, Rise of Fascism, Huge increase in Anti- Semitism

Klaus Rohrich image

Re-posted from the Canada Free Press By  —— Bio and ArchivesApril 15, 2020

Those who do not learn from history…As the subject of world history has become less about facts and more about the evils of Western Civilization, due to the perceived sins of our ancestors, I dread the truth of George Santayana’s famous quip, “Those who cannot remember the past are condemned to repeat it.”

From the perspective of the year 2020, things are looking a lot like they did a hundred years ago. Back in 1920 the world had just finished a Great War, and a massive pandemic, estimated to have killed upwards of 100 million people. Considering that the global population in 1920 was approximately 1.8 billion people, the number of deaths caused by the Spanish Flu pandemic represented nearly 5% of the global population.

The 1920s were also a decade that saw explosive economic growth

The 1920s were also a decade that saw explosive economic growth, driven largely by the post-war boom and easy credit. That, plus the Smoot-Hawley Act brought on the Great Depression, which lasted an entire decade and was finally ended due to the stimulative effect of World War Two.

Back then, no one thought very much about global warming. But they did have a massive anti-alcohol lobby that managed to get the Volstead Act passed in Congress prohibiting the sale, distribution and consumption of ‘spirits’ in the United States. The prohibitionists of yore would be today’s climate change protesters.

The 1920s also saw massive social, economic and political disruptions due to the various competing socialist philosophies. Russia was taken over by Bolsheviks, Mensheviks and other radical socialist organizations, who then fought it out to ultimately become the Soviet Union.

Italy was undergoing tectonic political upheavals in the 1920s that resulted in Benito Mussolini becoming that country’s leader under the Fascist Banner. It appears Mussolini founded the Fascist Party because he was kicked out of the Italian Socialist Party for being too far to the left.

There’s not much one can add about the turmoil in Germany during the 1920s, except That it was precipitated by socialists, anarchists and communists fighting among each other. How many people today know the meaning of the official NAZI Party name, National Socialistiche Deutsche Arbeiter Partei (NSDAP).

Translated from the German, it means National Socialist German Workers’ Party. Note the word, ‘Socialist’ in the NSDAP’s official name. The only disagreement Hitler’s socialism had with Stalin’s socialism was in how to run the economy. Everything else was pretty much similar.

Anti-Semitism was a growing force during the 1920s

In Asia, an ambitious imperial power began to flex its military muscle by invading its neighbors and declaring the Pacific and Indian Oceans as vital parts of their empire’s sphere of influence under the so-called Greater East Asia Co-Prosperity Sphere, then aligned with Germany and Italy against every British and American interest around the globe.

Anti-Semitism was a growing force during the 1920s and ultimately resulted in one of history’s Greatest Genocides.

Not to put too fine a point on this, doesn’t today feel an awful lot like it might have felt 100 years ago?

Consider

  • America’s longest-ever war (18 years!) has just ended in defeat
  • The economy has been on steroids with growth in the past three years eclipsing that of the previous five
  • Household debt in North America is at the highest levels ever.
  • Pandemic? Check!
  • Civil unrest? Check!
  • Rise of socialism? Check!
  • Rise of Fascism? Check
  • Huge increase in Anti- Semitism, particularly in Europe? Double check!

When is the last time “Climate Change” was considered the world’s most pressing issue?

Oh, and let’s not forget about that Asian Empire. The Greater East Asia Co-Prosperity Sphere is currently under new management, but essentially retains its original goals with a much more sophisticated degree of raw power, deception and mendacity.

And when is the last time “Climate Change” was considered the world’s most pressing issue?

The Future?

Given all that we know about the past, what can one think about events starting to play out this decade?

How many deaths, globally, will be attributed to COVID 19? Will this pandemic be as lethal as the Spanish Flu and will there be a second wave of infections lasting into 2022?

There is little doubt that there will be a significant economic downturn. The only question is, ‘how significant?’ Will the coming recession last six or eight months, or will it stretch into a depression, lasting years? And if indeed, a depression is the case, how will the economy be able to recover? Will we need a War to regain overall economic viability?

Numerous countries’ populations are under what amounts to martial law

These are very troubling questions and I am particularly concerned about the direction in which we are heading. Numerous countries’ populations are under what amounts to martial law. Yet few people seem concerned about regulatory overreach. Will this become a permanent state of affairs?

A large part of my pessimism is also based on the fact that the people charged with leading us through troubled times appear to be as clueless as anyone. In an emergency isn’t there a hierarchy of actions predicated on the mitigation of damage? Aren’t the actions taken by authorities based on solid information? It certainly gives credence to William F. Buckley’s preference to entrust governance of the US to the first 400 people in the Boston telephone directory than to the Harvard faculty.

There are a lot of Individuals welcoming the New Normal, even though no one knows what it looks like. If the decade that followed the “Roaring Twenties” is any indication, it will certainly be interesting.

Cuomo Requiring New Yorkers to Wear Face Masks is Tyranny


Only criminals wear masks in our country, not regular people. We make exceptions for our Fictional Crime Fighters: The Lone Ranger, Batman, and Robin, and for today’s Real Live Heroes: Doctors and Nurses doing their jobs.

Daniel Wiseman  image

Re-posted from the Canada Free Press By —— Bio and ArchivesApril 15, 2020

Cuomo Requiring New Yorkers to Wear Face Masks is TyrannyNew York Gov. Andrew Cuomo’s order Wednesday that all state residents wear a mask on their faces during COVID-19 is capricious and anti-American.

This latest Cuomo edict comes a mere 10 days after he “recommended” that residents of New York State wear a mask during COVID-19 to protect OTHER people, even though there is no comprehensive study proving that a healthy person who maintains social distancing of six feet can infect someone else. This is the definition of capricious, a causeless change of mind befitting a child. Why is Cuomo’s new addition to his Executive Order also anti-American? Because protecting others from infinitesimal risk is not anyone’s responsibility under our constitutional system.

Government ought to leave us alone as much as possible

In America, we are responsible to keep ourselves safe and then next to protect our families. Under the Constitution, Americans have no unlimited obligation to the “community,” except to follow reasonable laws, even when one disagrees with them. If citizens want to participate in the insane, overblown reaction of the New York State government to the COVID-19 “crisis,” that’s fine. But the real “crisis” remains the state and federal government closing the economy which potentially puts all Americans in far more danger with lost liberty and a decimated country.

Americans don’t belong to the state, and that’s what Cuomo is saying by requiring people to wear masks on their face. “We The People,” are the ultimate authority in this country, and we need to remember that more than ever as we live through the COVID-19 hysteria.

Government ought to leave us alone as much as possible, especially in this case when not wearing a mask poses only minimal,hypothetical risk to others.

Living in New York State under Gov. Andrew Cuomo’s Executive Order has caused hardship for all, but as good citizens, we have adhered to “sheltering in place,” working remotely, and for some, being classified as a worker in an “essential” industry. Anybody who cares about civil liberties and freedom has chafed under these restrictions, but we have endeavored to help “flatten the curve” of COVID-19. But, as I’ve written previously and it’s worth saying again, millions of Americans die prematurely each year from cancer, heart and lung disease, alcohol and drug abuse, car accidents, unintentional injuries, and suicides and we do not shutter society and our national economy for these maladies. COVID-19 is a relative piker in terms of being lethal, especially when one considers that it mainly kills the elderly and those with compromised immune systems. Similar to the flu, COVID-19 mostly shortens life as compared to the horrific deaths mentioned above which kill Americans of various ages and health.

It’s not money versus lives, as Democrats are fond to say; it’s Americans’ lives devastated compared to some lives lengthened

Government ought to leave us alone as much as possibleSo far, President Trump has merely recommended that Americans wear a face covering, and not of the surgical N95 kind which are in short supply and needed by medical personnel to treat COVID-19 patients. But, as I predicted to friends earlier this month, Cuomo’s recommendation then would become today’s requirement.

We need to get this country open and working, as soon as possible. Already, in the last three weeks, more than 15 million Americans have lost their jobs. Divorces, domestic violence, and alcohol abuse have increased. Soon, there may be widespread societal unraveling and civil unrest if and when unemployment numbers explode. It’s not money versus lives, as Democrats are fond to say; it’s Americans’ lives devastated compared to some lives lengthened.

Being forced to wear a mask takes prevention to absurd extremes. Incredibly, Cuomo has said his actions are designed to save even one person and that New Yorkers will enforce others to wear a mask!

So far, I have been able to quarantine myself, get exercise, and work remotely with minimum inconvenience by following Cuomo’s original executive order first issued in March. But the Shut Down America crowd ignores the reality of Life: People Die. We are all going to die of something, some day, sooner or later.

Wearing masks to reduce infinitesimal risk represents tyranny masquerading as science.

What’s happening with the COVID-19 response is that the cure is worse than the disease

The World Health Organization and the CDC have repeatedly said that most people do not need to wear masks unless they are sick and coughing. As recently as February, the U.S. Surgeon General even urged the public to stop buying medical masks, warning that it would not help against the spread of COVID-19.

But now Cuomo says we New Yorkers may be “sick, with no symptoms,” asymptomatic. Therefore, how people choose to breathe has become a POSSIBLE health risk! You can be sure that forced COVID-19 testing is around the corner.

Also as recently as February, the World Health Organization stated that viral transmission of COVID-19 was likely “rare.” This means with Cuomo’s new directive a person with no symptoms is being required to cover his or her mouth to prevent droplets from going into the air, so that people who ARE wearing masks and are staying six feet away will not likely contract COVID-19. It strains credulity that an otherwise healthy person not wearing a mask and maintaining social distancing poses a societal risk.

What’s happening with the COVID-19 response is that the cure is worse than the disease. We can’t save America by destroying America. In short, there is no significant scientific evidence that wearing a mask in public does any good unless you have COVID-19 and are trying to protect others from catching it.

We cannot live in a world where there is no risk. We ought to be able to isolate the most susceptible from early death from COVID-19 and keep our country and our economy moving.

Only criminals wear masks in our country, not regular people. We make exceptions for our Fictional Crime Fighters: The Lone Ranger, Batman, and Robin, and for today’s Real Live Heroes: Doctors and Nurses doing their jobs.

Will We Starve? Do Politicians Even Understand What They Are Doing?


QUESTION: Dear Sir,
Best of health to you and your family.
What i observe and it is amazing is that every-day-ordinary people like me, are very worried but they are underestimating the disaster that will follow.
Everyone says it is gonna be bad but when i am expressing my opinion on how black will be the days to come, they think i am an alien talking nuts.
But my question is the following:
How the system will treat all these people that will starve? Soon, will not be able to pay our rents – including myself. So, in practice, how are they gonna handle it? Give us vouchers? We will start to beat one each other to death for survival while in the queue…
I am very very worried. I got already -25% on my salary and soon it will get to zero. Then what?
What are the governments gonna do?
Thank you from my heart for what you do.
You bring light to our eyes.
SM – from Europe

ANSWER: This is so irrational that it is hard to even speculate. From working with governments for over 40 years, I have come to understand that no politician will ever act for the future. Their incentive is only the next election. With that in mind, I have to assume that they are only looking at the immediate action. I believe they have realized that the ECB is trapped and that Keynesian Economics is dead. They can only be looking at this as a means to default and reshape the monetary system. They are not looking at the economic damage and people think life will return to normal just as soon as this lockdown ends. But the destruction to the economy and wiping out so many small businesses is condemning society to poverty. Economic growth will decline most likely into 2032.

I do not think these people can see beyond this year. Even Gates is obsessed with his climate change and vaccines, yet he has no concept of what he has done to society or how long it takes to build what we had. The average life expectancy was 45 in the middle ages. If the economy collapses, so will the life expectancy. Is that Gates’ goal? Does he think we can have a future with no industry, ZERO CO2, no cars, and still a perfect world? Gates has three children. What kind of future will he leave them? Money cannot buy them a life if society is destroyed. All his money will become worthless.

Society will rise up and we will head into war. What is left might be just a shadow of what it once was. We will have to rebuild again after 2032.

EU Starting to Expose its Communist Agenda


 

Margrethe Vestager, Executive Vice President of the EU and Commissioner for Competition, has spoken out that EU states should now nationalize companies in the fight against China. Accordingly, Vestager has revealed that the justification for now nationalizing industry, which was the goal of the Climate Change contingency, is to prevent domestic companies being bought by the Chinese. This entire coronavirus has been an organized plot to seize control of the economy by the socialists. This is where there has been a direct assault using the media in hopes of defeating Trump, the Netherlands, and Germany.

Marxism was not satisfied with killing 200 million the last time. Here we go again looking to reduce the population by anyone who disagrees with their Climate Change/Communistic agenda.

The Propaganda & China


Armstrong Economics Blog/China

COMMENT: RE China analysis
Marty,
It is so clear to me that you have not been exposed to the changing workforce and have always worked for yourself.
How did I get laid off so many times? Jobs sent to China. We have been in an economic war with China for at least 2 decades with US corrupt politicians selling out the American people. We have run a huge deficit with China, not good for the US economy. Outsourcing our jobs, how is that good for Americans? Dianne Feinstein had a Chinese spy driver for 20 years !
I have taken the brunt of it being on the front lines of a changing workforce. You have not.
Additionally claiming that somehow the economy of China is not communist is day dreaming. The CCP invests in companies and controls the people and the economy as much as they can. They have long range plans. They also manipulated their currency. They have concentration camps.. come on Marty. Come on… wake up. You cannot go through life saying human rights abuses don’t matter because the numbers using slave labor makes you a profit. Wake up please… you are being to me at least really naive about this topic. I hate to say that because you are brilliant, but for some reason your smarts are compromised on this issue because you are frankly compartmentalizing thing, a very male trait ( sorry ) whereas females tend to think wholistically. We are different that way. Please consider more broadly the entire China situation.

Thanks for the blog

A

REPLY: Communism is where people do not own any property. China is no longer Communist, it is more of what you would define as a managed democracy that is perhaps authoritarian, which seems to be the direction we are heading. You should also point the finger at Washington. Roosevelt installed the payroll tax and Social Security. From the employer’s perspective, whatever tax you paid, they had to match. Then you add regulations for healthcare, etc., and the greater the burden, the more costly American labor became.

With everything government does, the justification for that instant may sound logical, but it never expires. Locking us down for a claimed virus is a new precedent and they will do this from here on out — a new power they get to play with. We are searched, x-rayed, and must remove our shoes to get on a plane since 9/11. With each crisis, we lose more and more civil liberties and human rights.

No Communist country would ever allow their people to be tourists. I had a friend whose family was split by the Berlin Wall. They let a woman go to her mother’s funeral in West Berlin provided they held her children hostage to ensure she would return. That is a communistic state. The people are just slaves and the state comes before everything.

While you may see it only as China, jobs domestically are being replaced by robots for the very same reason — taxes and rising healthcare costs that no politician will address. There is a common thread running through this which is the excessive cost of governments. They need more money so they just raise taxes without any regard for the impact on the people. Often taxes on air travel are equal to 50% of the ticket, which is why a lot of airlines are charging fees to cancel, bring bags, food, etc. for they are not subject to that tax. Above is the breakdown of taxes on your cell phone, which is typically 18% (New Jersey as an example but all states do the same).

It is a complex issue, but it is by no means just China, Germany, or Japan. Much of the problem has been the constant trend of raising taxes on labor which is giving the incentive to replace whatever jobs can be done by robots or self-service. When I park in a garage downtown, I pull in and the machine spits out the ticket. When I leave, the next machine takes the ticket and the credit card and I never see a person. They save that salary and all the costs of mandated healthcare.

 

Airports are becoming all self-service. In Frankfurt, the machine prints out your ticket. When you go to check your bag, you put it on another machine that then spits out the baggage tag. Then it moves your bag onto a conveyor with nobody there. If you have any problems, you then must go to the customer service counter.

As for human rights, the United States is one of the #1 violators. You have none when you stand before a judge in Federal Court. They have a 98-99% conviction rate that beats even Adolf Hitler’s notorious court that had only a 90% conviction rate. The United States has more people in prison than the rest of the world does – combined.

This anti-liberal attitude in law is a violation of human rights. If you are charged, you are PRESUMED GUILTY! There is no presumption of innocence. That is a lie and propaganda. I disagree with the Republicans on their appointments of judges. You will never imagine how many innocent people are in prison because of this policy.

I was tortured, thrown in a cell so hot your underwear was too much to wear, and then taken to a cell so cold that you could see your breath. As long as they do not leave a mark on your body, it’s not considered torture just like water-boarding. They seek to break people down mentally. They take pleasure in torturing people. You will never know evil until you look into the eyes of such prosecutors.

So do not listen to the propaganda that China violates human rights as if America treats everyone with respect and dignity. America is the biggest hypocrite you will ever encounter when it comes to pointing fingers at others for human rights. The same on trade. China and others have absorbed jobs because the cost of those jobs domestically became too much due to overregulation and taxes. It has never simply been to pay someone else $2 an hour v $10. You have also taxes on the corporations and the drive to increase dividends. It is a multidimensional issue.

COVID-19 Miracle Cure for All Other Disease Prevents Heart Attacks


 

If you want to become a doctor right now you can become one without years of training in New York City. Just attribute all deaths to COVID-19 so Governor Cuomo can justify keeping everyone locked down in a desperate attempt to boost Democrats for the 2020 elections. It is astonishing how COVID-19 has become a miracle cure for all diseases. Nobody is dying of even a heart attack for the last two weeks. Just sneeze, and that is good enough to classify you with Coronavirus.

 

 

Meanwhile, in Germany, the first real study has revealed that only 0.37% of coronavirus infected people die from it. According to this, the death rate of the novel virus is only around 0.4%. Our sources in Italy were reporting that NOBODY was dying from Coronavirus alone. They typically had some other disease.

The media has threatened our liberty, our livelihood, and the national security of the nation with FAKE NEWS as always. Something as to be done to stop these people from undermining our freedom and civil liberties worldwide.

Civil Unrest Rising in Belgium


Violent riots broke out in the Belgian city of Anderlecht last weekend. Violence erupted Saturday afternoon, with groups of migrants throwing rocks and glass at police officers, according to reports. One man is said to have fired three shots in the air from a gun that appeared to have been stolen from the police. All the studies show you cannot lock people down. They will begin to become violent after 4 to 6 weeks. This fake attempt to use a virus that has not proven to be even as lethal as the annual flu will have serious implications in rising civil unrest. You will NOT be able to keep people locked down for 18 months as Bill Gates is insisting.

Limitation of the President & Have the States Violated the Constitution Imposing a Lockdown?


(DOWNLOAD this Article: Commerce Clause.docx

QUESTION: Can Trump reopen the economy at will?

UT

ANSWER: There is no doubt that Americans have been getting a civics lesson as they turn to Washington for answers to the coronavirus crisis, but discover that their state governors have assumed far more control over what goes on in their daily lives than the constitution allows. It has been State and local authorities making decisions about shutting down businesses and allocating medical equipment to hospitals – not the President. They have merely listened to Bill Gates and the compromised Anthony Fauci whose recommendations are illegal.

This is what the “United States” meant that there was a separation of powers between federal and state. This is the system the founding fathers designed, though it seems anachronistic to many while people like Fauci have been the stooge for Bill Gates claiming this is a deadly disease that warrants we be locked-down as prisoners in our own homes without any legal authority under the Constitution.

It is the Commerce Clause in the United States Constitution (Article I, Section 8Clause 3) that governs this question. The Commerce Clause states that the United States Congress shall have power:

“[t]o regulate Commerce with foreign Nations, and among the several States, and with the Indian Tribes.”

The Supreme Court ruled in Swift and Company v. United States, 196 U.S. 375 (1905), that Congress had the authority to regulate local commerce, as long as that activity could become part of a continuous “current” of commerce that involved the interstate movement of goods and services.

My interpretation of this is simple. It is unconstitutional for any state to block interstate commerce. Consequently, the President has the executive power to issue a binding order to open up commerce and the states cannot legally resist that order for keeping the economy locked-down violates the Commerce Clause. Over the years, the meaning of the word “commerce” has been a source of controversy. The Constitution did not explicitly define the word. That has led to legal arguments back and forth.

Some argue that the word “Commerce” refers only to trade or exchange. Others counter that claim arguing that the Framers intended to describe more broadly commercial and social connections between citizens of different states. Hence, the interpretation of “Commerce” has been the dividing line between federal and state power. My reading is that they intended to prevent states from discriminating against each other and to ensure the free-flow of both the people with the freedom to travel and commerce in an economic sense.

In Gibbons v. Ogden, 22 U.S. 1 (1824), the Supreme Court held back then that intrastate activity could be regulated under the Commerce Clause, provided that the activity is part of a larger interstate commercial scheme. In Swift, as I said, the Supreme Court held that Congress had the authority to regulate local commerce provided it was part of a continuous “current” of commerce that involved the interstate movement of goods and services. Therefore, from 1905 until about 1937, the Supreme Court used this narrow version of the Commerce Clause. However, that changed with Franklin D. Roosevelt who stacked the court to justify his socialism and the New Deal. Beginning with NLRB v. Jones & Laughlin Steel Corp, 301 U.S. 1 (1937), the Supreme Court recognized broader grounds upon which the Commerce Clause could be used to regulate state activity since FDR was seeking more power to dominate the states.

The Supreme Court held in NLRB that activity was commerce if it had a “substantial economic effect” on interstate commerce or if the “cumulative effect” of a single act could have an effect on such commerce. Then in NLRB v. Jones, United States v. Darby, 312 U.S. 100 (1941) and Wickard v. Filburn, 317 U.S. 111 (1942), the Supreme Court revealed its socialist interpretation which broadened the scope of the Commerce Clause. Suddenly, what emerged was a highly dynamic and integrated national economy, whereby the Court applied its broad interpretation of the Commerce Clause, reasoning the even local activity will likely affect the larger interstate commercial economic scheme. The limitations between state and federal were no longer so clear.

After 1937 until 1995, the Supreme Court never invalidated a single law on the basis of the Commerce Clause. State’s rights seem to fade into the distant horizon. Then in 1995, the Supreme Court attempted to curtail this expansive interpretation of the Commerce Clause and was returning to a more conservative interpretation. This decision came down in United States v. Lopez, 514 U.S. 549 (1995). In Lopez, the defendant was charged with carrying a handgun to school in violation of the federal Gun-Free School Zones Act of 1990. The defendant argued that the federal government had no authority to regulate firearms in local schools, while the government claimed that this fell under the Commerce Clause, arguing that possession of a firearm in a school zone would lead to violent crime, thereby affecting the general economic conditions. The Supreme Court rejected that argument and held that Congress only has the power to regulate the channels of commerce, the instrumentalities of commerce, and action that substantially affects interstate commerce. The Court declined to further expand the Commerce Clause holding:

“To do so would require us to conclude that the Constitution’s enumeration of powers does not presuppose something not enumerated, and that there never will be a distinction between what is truly national and what is truly local. This we are unwilling to do.”

In Gonzales v. Raich, 545 U.S. 1 (2005), the Supreme Court returned to its more liberal construction of the Commerce Clause in relation to intrastate production. In Gonzales, the Court upheld federal regulation of intrastate marijuana production.

Then in 2012, the Supreme Court again dealt with the Commerce Clause in NFIB v. Sebelius, 567 US. 519 (2012) concerning the individual mandate in the Affordable Care Act (AFA), which sought to require uninsured individuals to secure health insurance (Obamacare) in an attempt to stabilize the health insurance market. Focusing on Lopez’s requirement that Congress could regulate only commercial activity, the Court held that the individual mandate could not be enacted under the Commerce Clause. The Court stated that requiring the purchase of health insurance under the AFA was not the regulation of commercial activity so much as inactivity and was, accordingly, impermissible under the Commerce Clause.

CONCLUSION

Therefore, relying on these decisions, the attempt by the states to lock-down the economy is UNCONSTITUTIONAL and the President has the power even under National Security to reopen the economy since it has been illegally shut down at the request of Bill Gates and his surrogate Anthony Fauci. This is dealing DIRECTLY with interstate commerce which is no different than protectionism that each state could then impose tariffs on imports from another state, which was the clear intention of the Founding Fathers to prohibit.

New Jersey Governor Defends Keeping Stay-Home Orders Until Late Summer, or Maybe Next Year….


New Jersey Democrat Governor Phil Murphy is a member of Governor Andrew Cuomo’s economic task force on the Wuhan Virus.  Earlier today Comrade Murphy announced all citizens in the New Jersey Directorate would remain on lock-down, suspending all citizen rights, until the state government declares all signs of the Wuhan Virus are gone.

The North Eastern political ideologues are counting on financing from the Federal government to keep their citizens confined.  Essentially the state of New Jersey will remain on perpetual quarantine until politicians determine it is safe to engage in civic society.

Tonight on Tucker Carlson Comrade Murphy defended his decision. Carlson contrast the state allowing liquor stores to remain open but shutting down religious services.  All determinations are ideological…

It seemed clear several weeks ago this was going to happen.  East coast blue state governors and West coast blue state governors are united to begin the economic civil war planning to block any White House effort to re-open the U.S. economy.  The founders planned for this in Article I, Sec 10 (paragraph 3):

“No state shall, without the consent of Congress, … enter into any agreement or compact with another state”..

The three step plan seems predictable: (1) Get out ahead of President Trump. (2) Defy the ‘all clear’ and shape economic benefit to their political allies. (3) Then use Fauci’s upcoming dossier to hit the administration for heartlessly opening the economy too early.

♦ On the East Coast the governors of New York (Cuomo), New Jersey (Murphy), Connecticut (Lamont), Pennsylvania (Wolfe), Delaware (Carney) and Rhode Island (Raimondo) have started assembling their economic war council with the intent to keep the northeast region shut down.  Controlling critical ports and infrastructure is a key part of their strategy.

EAST COAST — Six Northeast governors will form a working group to come up with a plan to restart [control] the regional economy, they announced on Monday. (link)

♦ On the West Coast the governors of California (Newsom), Oregon (Brown) and Washington State (Inslee) are also assembling their economic war council for similar intents and purposes.  Combined with their political northeastern allies, controlling two-thirds of U.S. ports will give them a strategic advantage to keep choking the economy until after they can install their commanding general in the White House.

WEST COAST – The governors of Washington, California and Oregon on Monday announced they were working on a joint plan for reopening[controlling] their states’ respective economies once it is safe to lift coronavirus-related restrictions.

 

It appears the Governors rushed to publicity to avoid their enemy, U.S. President Donald Trump, striking strategically against their schemes.   As the interview with Governor Murphy highlights, during this economic war residents within the Blue occupied territories will be held captive to the political whims of their regional generals.

The economic freedom and liberty zone will encompass the Red region.  The center of the country, mid west, southern region (surrounding the Gulf of Mexico) and south eastern Atlantic region.   These areas will be open to commerce and economic freedom.

However, the urban dense populations (Blue pockets within Red zones) will push-back against the efforts of the Red generals in an attempt to retain alignment with their Blue team generals.  Depending on the strength of the urban forces there may be roadblocks, sabotage, skirmishes and political violence against the freedom & liberty Red team.

Red captives within the Blue zones will have to be smart and strategic.  Big Blue tech will be assisting the totalitarian Blue generals. Direct confrontation against the Blue forces should be avoided, and it will likely be a better strategy to fight stealthily as insurgents.

Any Red team member of the economic freedom alliance, trapped within a Blue region, is warned to evaluate their connection to their electronic devices.  Your cell phones could be used as portable transponders expose your movement and your political views.

This is going to be one hell of a battle.  A Spring and Summer conflict like we’ve never seen in the history of U.S. politics outside of actual, physical, civil war.