Was 9/11 A Plot to Seize Power?


QUESTION: What is your view on the new demands for an investigation that there is “overwhelming evidence” that the buildings were brought down by explosives?

KD

ANSWER: I do not know about the Twin Towers, but I can say that the first World Trade Center bombers drew the World Trade Center on the wall of their cell in MCC with planes flying into it. There is no question that there was a terrorist attack. HOWEVER !!!!!!!! There is evidence, I know PERSONALLY, that the government knew what they were going to do. Do not confuse the fact that there were planted explosives to try to pretend there was not a terrorist attack. They just used the attack as cover.

I focus on building 7, which was never hit by any plane, yet it fell like a pancake and that was indicative of explosives. Curiously, the SEC was there and this is where they kept the evidence for court cases. Gun possession cases should have been dismissed but the prosecutors then showed photos of guns. The joke was that they used the same photo for everyone. Judges just accepted it and pronounced, “Take him away.” That is not the way the law is supposed to work.

I had tapes that would have put the whole New York banker crew in prison if we had a real government. There were tapes covering every manipulation they pulled off from rhodium to platinum and silver. It was the platinum manipulation that I had a tape of where they admitted to bribing to a Russian minister to “recall” their platinum to take an inventory. They forced platinum to rally, then the Russian minister announced they found “more” platinum to ensure the price would crash after they flipped their positions. Even Ford Motor Company was looking into suing over that manipulation.

All the evidence I had documenting each player and what they did was seized and vanished. My requests for documents were never honored. One is supposed to be entitled to discovery. There is no rule of law. You cannot win against the bankers. When I asked a New York lawyer why the bankers are never prosecuted, he smiles and laughed. His response: “You don’t shit where you eat!”

We will never have a secure financial market until someone is ready to clean up the corruption in New York City.

There is no question that 9/11 was the event that destroyed the constitution. We lost all of our privacy and rights ever since.

 

NEC Director Larry Kudlow -vs- U.S. CoC President Tom Dohonue…


With President Trump announcing an additional ten percent tariff on $300 billion of Chinese products, the Chamber of Commerce worm, Tom Donohue, comes out to oppose.

An interesting juxtaposition between two interviews.  The first with National Economic Council Director Larry Kudlow, and the counter point by CoC President Dohohue:

.

In the next interview Donohue surfaces… he has no choice.  Tom Donohue is paid tens of millions by the Wall Street multinationals to retain the current exploitative system of global trade.  Donohue has no influence over President Trump.

In the Clinton/Clinton, Bush/Bush, Obama/Obama terms, Tom Donohue was allowed to purchase control, and write the trade language that perpetuated the benefit to those who paid him for trade policy.   Three administration’s sub-contracted the work to the CoC.

As a consequence, over the past 25 years the Chamber of Commerce actually wrote the rules, regulations, language and details within the trade deals.  That language was written by the CoC to the benefit of those who paid for the terms (Wall Street Corporations) regardless of impact to the U.S. economy or worker.

President Trump stopped this process.

President Trump’s economic team (USTR and Commerce) took back control over the trade negotiation process, and only the U.S. economic team writes the trade language.  Wall Street has been cut out of the process.  This is the reason for so much of the anger directed toward President Trump and the global trade reset.

.

Buyer Beware – AOC Challenger Candidate Launch Has Familiarity….


The launch of a “republican” political challenger in NY-14 to challenge Alexandria Ocasio-Cortez, Sherie Murray, follows a very familiar political ploy…. A fake candidate intended to protect AOC in 2020.   In June of 2018 Sherie Murray was an avid AOC supporter.

In the last 36 hours you may have seen “republican” candidate Sherie Murray promoted, seemingly out of nowhere, by a variety of media platforms (social media and traditional). However, when there is an obviously coordinated effort to push a rapid high visibility roll-out; and that effort is for a singular congressional district; it is always worth doing some background research.

(Twitter Link)

BEWARE – Having watched this type of political scheme for several years; and accepting people for what they do, not what they claim to be; in my opinion Murray is likely in place to protect AOC in the 2020 race.  This perspective is bolstered by how the launch/roll-out was also timed and scheduled by Fox News.

Tick-Tock Hannity is a favorite political deployment tool of the Murdoch interests. [It’s not cynicism, it’s an objective, albeit annoying-to-admit, aspect.]   Hannity has strong support from viewers who are republican, conservative and politically engaged.   If you want to elevate a faux candidate, and shield yourself in the process, Hannity is the place to go.

Remember, these interviews are pre-scheduled.  Fox producers didn’t stumble upon Scherie Murray on the first day of her campaign launch and sign her up for an interview less than twelve hours later.  This was a structured, pre-planned, coordinated effort.

.

Is it possible that Scherie Murray was a strong activist supporter of President Obama and candidate AOC in the primary of 2018 [key note: ‘the primary‘] and then suddenly had a change of heart in 2019 after seeing AOC’s political activism in action?….

Possible, yes.

Probable, no.

A person who is engaged in the outcome of a political primary is an engaged political person.  Ms. Murray likely knew exactly what AOC was about (democrat-socialism) when she was congratulating her and looking forward to what AOC would deliver.

In addition to noting how Murray is not responding to any inquiry about her prior political support and ideology…. well, just, trust your gut instinct.

No further comment needed.  Moving on…

Sean Hannity

@seanhannity

**COMING FOR OCASIO-CORTEZ: “AOC chooses self-promotion over service, conflict over constituents, resistance over assistance. We need to build bridges, not burn them down.** https://hannity.com/media-room/coming-for-aoc-gop-challenger-rips-ocasio-cortez-says-seeking-celebrity-over-service/ 

COMING FOR AOC: GOP Challenger RIPS Ocasio-Cortez, Says Seeking ‘Celebrity’ Over ‘Service’ | Sean…

GOP challenger Scherie Murray slammed Rep. Alexandria Ocasio-Cortez on social media Wednesday; slamming the far-left legislator after officially kicking off her campaign for New York’s 14th Congres…

hannity.com

6,652 people are talking about this

Scherie Murray@ScherieMurray

Great talking with @BillHemmer and @HeatherChilders this morning. Thanks for having me on the show! https://twitter.com/americanewsroom/status/1151871568328495104 

America’s Newsroom

@AmericaNewsroom

THE HEADLINER: @BillHemmer and @HeatherChilders spoke with @AOC‘s 2020 challenger @ScherieMurray about her campaign launch #nine2noon

Embedded video

2,926 people are talking about this

Scherie Murray@ScherieMurray

Talked with @IngrahamAngle this afternoon about our campaign and why we need to rid NYC of AOC. Listen in and then join team! http://Scheriemurray.com  https://twitter.com/ingrahamangle/status/1151945019366039552 

Laura Ingraham

@IngrahamAngle

Trump frames 2020 as patriotism & prosperity versus socialism & decline – The NEW #IngrahamPodcast is out, with @newtgingrich and @ScherieMurray. Listen and subscribe! https://bit.ly/2LpYI1m 

1,616 people are talking about this

America First…


I say give Trump the chance to do what he claims he wants to do for we really have nothing to lose if any of the rest get in the Republic is done!

Ted Cruz and John Kasich Criminal Conspiracy?


cRUZ-kasich

Ted Cruz and John Kasich have actually conspired to commit a federal crime by denying the American people the right to even vote. Their latest announcement to conspire together where one will step aside in one state to try to block Trump from achieving the nomination. Neither one of these politicians would have a legitimate delegate base to seek the nomination. Kasich is trying to just defeat the democratic process because the establishment hate Cruz intensely and Trump to a lessor degree. These two are now conspiring to steal the delegates after a first ballot nullifying the entire right to vote in the primaries, which is a federal crime. They are effectively saying that the Democratic process is not fair because the people are selecting someone who the establishment does not approve or in other words – not them. The solution they have come up with is to nullify the people’s choice and cheat them at the convention committing voter fraud.

Let’s make this clear. They will justify themselves by writing a rule and then claiming this is legal. There is a small problem they do not address. It is called the Supremacy Clause in the Constitution. The Supremacy Clause of the United States Constitution (Article VI,Clause 2) establishes that the Constitution, federal laws made pursuant to it, and treaties made under its authority, constitute the supreme law of the land. No rule passed by the delegates for the convention can supersede the constitution. Relying on any rule to circumvent the right to vote is a federal crime. They can write a rule and say the loser should be beheaded as in some Mayan sport game. That does not make it constitutional.

The Supreme Court has long ago recognized that the “right to vote” for federal offices is among the rights secured by Article I, Sections 2 and 4, of the Constitution, which is protected by Title 18 Section 241. United States v. Classic, 313 U.S. 299 (1941); Ex parte Yarborough, 110 U.S. 651 (1884). This statute was enacted following the Civil War and was intended to address efforts to deprive the newly emancipated slaves of the basic rights of citizenship, such as the right to vote. Therefore, we cannot find any other law more on point and intended to criminalize exactly what Cruz and Kasich have just announced.

This civil rights statue 18 U.S.C. § 241, has been interpreted to include any effort to derogate any right that flows from the Constitution or from federal law. Section 241 has been an important statutory tool in election crime prosecutions. It was used to even break-up the South’s intent to deprive blacks of their civil rights. This statute was initially held to apply only to schemes intended to corrupt elections for federal office and as such is directly on point.


 

If two or more persons conspire to injure, oppress, threaten, or intimidate any person in any State, Territory, Commonwealth, Possession, or District in the free exercise or enjoyment of any right or privilege secured to him by the Constitution or laws of the United States, or because of his having so exercised the same; or

If two or more persons go in disguise on the highway, or on the premises of another, with intent to prevent or hinder his free exercise or enjoyment of any right or privilege so secured –

They shall be fined under this title or imprisoned not more than ten years, or both; and if death results from the acts committed in violation of this section or if such acts include kidnapping or an attempt to kidnap, aggravated sexual abuse or an attempt to commit aggravated sexual abuse, or an attempt to kill, they shall be fined under this title or imprisoned for any term of years or for life, or both, or may be sentenced to death. 

18 U.S.C. § 241


This statue 18 U.S.C. § 241 has recently been applied successfully to non-federal elections as well when that state action was a necessary feature of the fraud. This state action requirement can be met not only by the participation of poll officials and notaries public, but by activities of persons who clothe themselves with the appearance of state authority, e.g., with uniforms, credentials, and badges. Williams v. United States, 341 U.S. 97 (1951).

Cruz and Kasich have openly stated that they are conspiring together to rig the election defrauding the majority of the people out of their right to vote for Trump. The Republicans can make rules that the delegates are not bound after the first ballot, but that has never been reviewed by the Supreme Court. Once you created a “right” to vote in the primary, to nullify that “right to vote” would logically violate 18 U.S.C. § 241.

So the interesting question is simply this. We have Hillary who clearly should be criminally prosecuted but will not because the Democrats control the prosecution process, and we have the two remaining Republicans who stand no chance whatsoever of winning anything, conspiring together to deprive the people of the right to vote which is also a felony. You have to admit, this is the craziest election since Andrew Jackson.

Leverage – Megyn Kelly Announces Planned Interview With Donald Trump….


A very interesting read; I knew Trump was good but this is really good, he is a Master without any doubt.

Pathetic – Ted Cruz and John Kasich Announce Joint “Never Voters Campaign” To Stop Donald Trump…


So it would seem that Kasich and Cruz would rather destroy the Republican party than let the voters pick Trump! In essence they are throwing a two year old temper tantrum to try and get their way — pathetic I agree. At least we have one adult left in the race Trump.

Chris Wallace Interviews Paul Manafort – Fox News Sunday (Video)…


I watched it this morning and I think he did OK. I don’t image Trump is easy to manage … lol

The Fate of Office: Last-In Gets All the Blame


Hoover_inaugeration

 

Herbert Clark Hoover (1874 – 1964) was the 31st President of the United States (1929–33). He was elected on Tuesday, November 6, 1928, and took office in 1929. He was blamed for 1929 although he was not its cause. Whoever wins this year’s Presidential election will be blamed for what the establishment has caused. People have asked if I support Trump. From a realistic perspective, if we were not facing what we face, I would prefer someone in there as a check and balance against the establishment. From a practical perspective, I would prefer Hillary for she deserves the legacy of what lies ahead.

California Poll: Trump Winning State and Holds Strong Primary Leads In All Regional Districts…


I hope it holds here for without California Trump can’t win.