NASA and NOAA are publishing fraudulent temperature data, which shows the exact opposite of what is actually happening and what they used to report.

This completely perverts the science, and causes scientists to look for imaginary explanations of imaginary phenomena.

On my flight back from the UK, the British Airways system was reporting incredibly cold -112F outside the aircraft. This caused me to waste about an hour trying to think up an explanation for what could be causing that.

When the plane landed in Denver, it still reported temperatures well below freezing. The instrumentation was broken.

The entire field of climate science depends on fraudulent data from NASA. This bad data has rendered and entire field of science both useless and misleading.

The area of sea ice lost from March 17 to June 17 is the smallest since 2006

arctic.atmos.uiuc.edu/cryosphere/timeseries.anom.1979-2008

Arctic sea ice has been tracking 2006 for the past three years

Ocean and Ice Services | Danmarks Meteorologiske Institut

Arctic sea ice is the thickest it has been since 2006.

Bpiomas_plot_daily_heff.2sst.png (2488×1960)

The melt season in Greenland is just getting started, over a month late. Greenland’s surface has gained 550 billion tons of ice since September, and there is only six weeks left to the melt season.

Greenland Ice Sheet Surface Mass Budget: DMI

You won’t hear about any of this from climate experts or the press, because they are paid to produce propaganda – not do science.

BBC NEWS | Science/Nature | Arctic summers ice-free ‘by 2013’Gore: Polar ice cap may disappear by summer 2014

Summary: Climate models are important for several reasons. Large flows of tax dollars go to their construction and operation. Their predictions dominate the public policy debate about climate change (to the exclusion of other tools, such as predictability studies). In this post eminent climate scientist Roger Pielke Sr. explains that long-term model forecasts have shown little skill at forecasting. Post your questions in the comments; he’ll answer as time permits.  {1st of 2 posts today).

“I offer a toast to the future, the undiscovered country.”
— Klingon Chancellor Gorkon in Star Trek IV.

The undiscovered country from whose bourn no traveler returns, puzzles the will and makes us rather bear those ills we have than fly to others that we know not of? …And thus the native hue of resolution is sicklied o’er with the pale cast of thought, and enterprises of great pith and moment with this…

Click to enlarge

UPDATE: In a recent paper, the climate scientist authors refer not to the onset of the Dark Ages Cold Period (c. A.D. 450-950), but to a period of “increased climate variability”. (This variability refers to variations in the hydroclimatic cycle.) The BBC uses the term “climate instability”, which is an amusing term because, of course, the climate is inherently unstable and largely unpredictable. There have been warm periods and cold periods, as well as prolonged droughts and flooding rains, throughout history, and they have been outside of our control or influence.

The paper’s abstract insists that the recent global warming (assuming they mean since the industrial era c. A.D. 1760) is unprecedented, despite acknowledging that past extremes of drought and flood have exceeded anything in the present. So, this begs the question, how can a modern warm period be so unprecedented when it is supposed to increase…

NSIDC begins their Arctic sea ice graphs in 1978-1979 – which creates the impression that Arctic sea ice is steadily declining.

Arctic Sea Ice News and Analysis | Sea ice data updated daily with one-day lag

They ignore satellite data prior to 1978, which shows that Arctic sea ice extent was two million km² lower in 1974. The graph below was in the 1995 IPCC report.

The Arctic is not melting down. It is currently the thickest since 2006, and thickness is about the same (2 meters) as it was 75 years ago.

Bpiomas_plot_daily_heff.2sst.png (2488×1960)

Papers Past — Auckland Star — 14 December 1940 — WARMER ARCTIC

An EIA report says that the Clean Power Plan will result closing 90GW of coal power instead of 40 GW estimated by EPA.