Re-Posted from the Canada Free Press By Andrew G. Benjamin —— Bio and Archives—May 17, 2020

Questions:

Can one assume that if the witness at a congressional hearing is either blocked from swearing in by the investigating committee, or is not sworn in to tell the truth, and nothing but the truth, there may be a good reason?

Can one assume that if the witness happens to be a whistleblower, he may have an agenda behind his appearance other than what he says it is? What can the witness gain from Adam Schiff’s circus?

We found out during the fraudulent impeachment hearings from the whistleblower’s attorney, revealed right after the President was sworn into office in 2017, that the whistleblower and his attorney are both Democrat activists. They both had an agenda. It just happened to be the same as congressman Adam Schiff’s, Nancy Pelosi’s, Schmuck Schemer (not a misprint), and Jerrod Nadler.

We found at the Kavanaugh hearings that the chief witness, Christine Blasey Ford, committed a series of perjuries. Her own witnesses did not back up her fictious delusions. We found she too, had an agenda. We found her attorney also had a hidden agenda.

Can we assume that if a witness is prevented from swearing in, the witness can say anything he wants to say without the risking legal liability? In other words, he can make it all up as he goes, like a bull rampaging through the china shop. And then scurry away free from lies that are intended to smear, libel, impugn, soil, and damage.

Lying to congress under oath has severe penalties. One good reason for not wanting to be sworn in.

Take the 17 vehicle armored, masked FBI SWAT Team with 29 agents brandishing automatic weapons and bright lights, showing up at one’s home in the middle of the night.

We are now uncovering Obama’s illegal  domestic spying operation. These self-dealing criminals enacted a coupwith fabricated evidence. Otherwise known as treason.

The Rich Bright testimony is a continuation of this ongoing process to replace an elected executive with a dictatorship of elites.

Dr. Richard Bright will not have to fear repercussions behind the fictions of his trumped up testimony. The pre-prepared statements written by Adam Schiff and Jerrod Nadler will replace a DOJ prosecution that can’t happen without the witness being sworn in. No evidence is needed either. After all, the evidence of the Russia Collusion after four years is still hiding somewhere in Adam Schiff’s pockets. It’s exactly as real as Barry Soetoro’s birth certificate.

That, is the point for the media event staged for children, a circus to convince the unknowing that up is down, and in is out. Never mind that all the major points Dr. Bright complained about were actually met by the crisis team—and then some. Never mind that China sent us defective masks. Never mind that Obama depleted the nation’s pandemic materials.

Never mind that the virus was being sent around the world along with five million tourists from Wuhan, China encouraged to travel. Never mind that China was quietly buying up the world’s supply of masks.

Never mind that Dr. Bright’s performance was not believed among his peers, and not a single one of them have come forward to support his tale. A repeat of Christine Ford’s failed attempt to unseat a great jurist on the mere blathering of a crazed Democrat activist.

Never mind that the good doctor never met Donald Trump, or exchanged any information with him. Never mind that the “issues” Dr. Bright proposed against the president were not issues he ever raised during his time with the Fauci Team.

He disagreed you say, with Fauci, or others, or Trump?

So what?

BREITBART: “Dr. Rick Bright, the vaccine expert who claims he was ousted from his former position in the administration because of his opposition to the promotion of hydroxychloroquine as a treatment for coronavirus, was already going to lose his job months before, according to information released on Twitter by Politico reporter Dan Diamond.”

(Boldfacing is this writer’s):
Diamond wrote “…..Jan. 2, about Bright’s imminent removal from BARDA for “incompetence and insubordination.” That was months before hydroxychloroquine became a topic of debate. The Trump administration has been working to oust Bright since last year, as officials battled with him over his management and leadership…” 
Ironically, Bright reversed himself soon enough and demanded more supplies of the drug HCQ:

“In March, Rick Bright requested the FDA issue an “Emergency Use Authorization (EUA) for emergency use of oral formulations of chloroquine phosphate and hydroxychloroquine sulfate for the treatment of 2019 coronavirus disease (COVID-19)…” 

In other words, Bright was singing with the choir all along about the shortage of pandemic supplies and the delivery of which no America attempted to delay. He did not disagree with others on Team Trump. Earlier he and his boss, Dr. Fauci opposed the very drug that has been proven to work around the globe, and just in last week’s NYU study, to save the lives of 44% of treated patients! In other words, Bright—and Dr. Anthony Fauci—were wrong. Bright was insubordinate, and got fired.

More importantly, against the hysterical juggernaut of media political hacks and their Democrats who were pooh-pooing the drug (as these people would rather let thousands of Americans die to prove a political point), Donald Trump stood firm and proved to be right all along about the effectiveness of hydroxychloroquine.

It is now a matter of record that this president will have saved tens of thousands, if not hundreds of thousands of lives. No spin can change that fact.

This unmasking of a possible politically-motivated assault against the president, including a possible agenda that motivated Bright’s hostility, may not be accepted in politically-correct circles.

Too bad.

Certainly not proper to contemplate the obvious: that testimony that was not sworn to, and remains unchallenged, has in fact unmasked the cynical agenda of Democrats to interfere with the 2020 election—and meant to damage the president and the American nation during a global pandemic crisis.