Armstrong Economics Blog/Corruption Re-Posted Jun 1, 2022 by Martin Armstrong
The Michael Sussmann trial is completely corrupt and biased to favor the Clintons. Sussmann is charged with lying to the FBI under 18 U.S.C. 1001 for claiming there were ties between the Trump campaign and Russian bank Alfa. Other Clinton advisors have admitted that Hillary Clinton herself signed off on the lie that Trump was colluding with the Russians to hack the 2016 US Presidential Election. Federal Judge Christopher Cooper who is overseeing the trial has been bought and paid for by the Clintons.
To begin, one of the jurors donated to the Clintons and simply said he would “strive for impartiality as best I can.” Judge Cooper overruled prosecutors’ objections to having him on the jury after he clearly said he could not guarantee he’d judged unbiasedly. Another woman on the jury is a far-left AOC supporter and donor, and a third said she simply cannot recall if she donated to the Clintons in the past. Worse, another woman admitted her husband worked for the failed Clinton campaign in 2008. As if all of this weren’t evidence enough of an unfair jury, one woman revealed that her daughter attends high school and plays sports with the defendant’s own daughter.
Corrupt Judge Cooper insists the trial cannot revolve around the actual Clinton campaign and has banned special counsel John Durham from suggesting any “joint venture.” The same permissions were not provided to Trump’s former staff when they faced their day in court. This entire trial appears to be for show as the jury likely reached a verdict before the trial began.