Armstrong Interview in Switzerland – “The Centralization of Power Always fails”

Armstrong Economics Blog/Armstrong in the Media Re-Posted Jan 25, 2021 by Martin Armstrong

“The Centralization of Power Always Fails”

Interview conducted by Claudio Grass

There are Many Reports from Around the World of People Becoming Seriously Ill After the Vaccine

Armstrong Economics Blog/Disease Re-Posted Jan 25, 2021 by Martin Armstrong

There are way too many people suffering from serious side-effects from these vaccines. There is a lot of information coming out about these vaccines, which have been pushed out without proper testing because this was a manufactured political emergency. Thirty people died after being vaccinated in Norway, prompting international concern outside the USA of course. Then there were nine Catholic bishops who all died of COVID in the same week? Meanwhile, a study in Italy showed that tumor patients had already developed antibodies to COVID-19 back in September 2019 showing that it was around before it is generally believed to have begun in China. You cannot give these vaccines to the frail elderly. The real crisis we have is that this virus has been usurped politically to create political change. The restrictions on the global economy are ensuring that we are looking at a broader economic depression. The lockdowns have not been effective and have resulted in many deaths of those who could not get other treatments.

Thai researcher has taken the vaccine and documented its results. She said: “General post-vaccination symptoms include a mild fever, headache, muscle pain, and shivering.” But then went on to say it will not ensure you will not get COVID! So why take a vaccine that will not prevent the disease? Is it like the flu vaccine where they say you may still get it but it will be less severe?

They there are some reports that after vaccination if you come into contact with one of the new strains which have appeared in the UK, Africa, and now California, you may have a worse experience. The entire problem has been that COVID has been used for political purposes of shutting down the economy to reduce CO2, and yes, to get rid of Trump.

I have also written about how my first son was killed by a ventilator. If they put people on a ventilator, they often die. A nurse has exposed what is being called murder by ventilators. There have been serious questions even about the PCR Tests used for COVID and peer reviews. But COVID has been weaponized for political purposes and therein lies the problem. People are terrorized by the media into getting vaccines that may cause serious injuries if not death in some people.

Even Bill Gates admitted that if he vaccinated the entire world, 700,000 people might die from the vaccines. Medical practices should be as the oath states: do no harm. YouTube has banned anything from the Frontline Doctors because it is in opposition to their personal agenda.

Somehow we have to separate politics from medicine. This is just getting way out of control. Our computer has warned that the disease cycle begins to hit in 2022. Is this a mutation of COVID? The fundamentals always seem to unfold to fit the model’s forecast.

Click on this link to see Dr. Simon Gold from front line Doctors.

The Two Worst States Are Running the Country?

Armstrong Economics Blog/Politics Re-Posted Jan 25, 2021 by Martin Armstrong

COMMENT:  I find it interesting how the two worse-run states in the country are the ones who lead Congress. This does not give me confidence in the future.


REPLY: You have a point. They are the two states California and New York with the highest number of people fleeing, yet their representatives are in charge of the country. Point well taken! Now you have AOC telling CNN she does not even feel safe with Republican politicians in Congress and she too is from New York. They seem to hate individuality and think they have to tear everything down that made America the land of opportunity in order to pander for votes – BUILD BACK BETTER. Do other states simply do as commanded by New York and California?

Vengeance on Capitol Hill

Armstrong Economics Blog/Politics Re-Posted Jan 25, 2021 by Martin Armstrong

The Democrats appear to be deliberately trying to divide the country to undermine their opposition. They seem to want violence to emerge so they can justify their Domestic Terrorist Act just as the French did during their revolution and Reign of Terror. There is a wealth of evidence that shows there were pipe bombs and all sorts of things placed at the Capitol building there before Trump ever gave his speech. They were not used but may have been a plant to further justify the launch of the Domestic Terrorist Act just as the government knew 911 would take place and allowed it to gain power. In fact, they had even breached the Capitol building before Trump finished speaking. The Democrats acknowledge that there is evidence that this was probably pre-planned. Nevertheless, they intend to put Trump on trial anyway while some of the people charged were not even Trump followers.

In a court of law, this flies in the face of the First Amendment as the Supreme Court has held in Brandenburg vOhio, 395 U.S. 444 (1969). It was squarely held that a KKK member could not be charged with incitement without an express order to commit violence. So there is no way Trump would be guilty of incitement qualifying for a high crime or misdemeanor. This seems to be a ploy for more power once again and may simply be using Trump rather than a superficial revenge scheme.

So what the hell is going on? They have been warned that this will not unite the country but further divide it. Has the thirst for power simply exceeded the unifying of the country? This seems to be the real objective so they can go after all those who oppose their agenda, PRECISELY using the very same tactics of censorship that were used during the French Reign of Terror. The danger of going forward with such a trial to remove a president who is no longer president is not merely absurd and sources say that even Democrats in the Senate question a trial. There seems to be simply a motive for another power grab to justify the Domestic Terrorist Act.

Sunday Talks, Tom Cotton Discusses China Targeting Trump Officials With Targeted Economic and Financial Weapons

Posted originally on the conservative tree house on January 24, 2021 by Sundance

U.S. Senator Tom Cotton (R-AR) presents himself as a patriot; however, he his also a tenuously positioned politician who attended the 2016 Sea Island summit to stop Trump. As an outcome, all Cotton positions, regardless of current issue-specific merit, should be reviewed carefully for self-serving benefit.

In this interview Senator Cotton discusses how China has recently targeted specific individuals within the former Trump administration for sanctions.  Cotton walks through a few examples of how the financial and economic targeting has real life consequences.

Irony Meets Hypocrisy, Jeff Bezos Company Amazon Disputes Validity of Mail-in Ballots

Posted originally on the conservative tree house on January 24, 2021 by Sundance

Democrat mega-donor and Amazon founder, Jeff Bezos, a man who previously took pictures of his penis to send to his mistress, is now claiming that mail-in ballots could be manipulated during a unionization vote in Alabama.

Ironically, and in accordance with the customary hypocrisy from the far-left, Bezos is the same person who advocated for mail-in ballots in the 2020 election.

(Via Wall Street Journal) – Amazon Inc. is seeking to postpone a unionization vote at a warehouse in Alabama and is asking federal labor authorities to reconsider a decision to allow mail-in voting due to the pandemic.

The company Thursday filed an appeal to a decision by the National Labor Relations Board, which is allowing a mail-in process due to Covid-19 risks instead of the in-person elections that are typical in such unionization votes.

The ballots are set to be mailed to about 6,000 workers associated with its Bessemer, Ala. facility on Feb. 8. In its petition, Amazon said the board’s decision was flawed in part because it had not adequately defined an outbreak, among other objections.

[…] Amazon declined to comment on its appeal but has said it believes the best approach to an election would be conducting it in person, saying it “provided the NLRB with a safe, confidential and convenient proposal for associates to vote on-site, which is in the best interest of all parties—associate convenience, vote fidelity and timeliness of vote count.”

Amazon’s appeal is one of a number of steps the company is taking to challenge the election. (read more)

Typical situational hypocrisy…

Sunday Combat, George Stephanopoulos vs Rand Paul Regarding Election Fraud

Posted originally on the conservative tree house on January 24, 2021 by Sundance

Senator Rand Paul (R-KY) appeared on This Week with George Stephanopoulos to debate the issue of 2020 election fraud.   In this combative interview, Senator Paul stands his ground against a highly-charged partisan media attack by Stephanopoulos.

Senator Paul wants an open and public review of the issues within the 2020 election.  George Stephanopoulos is claiming any inquiry into the election is baseless, and anyone who would make inquiries is a liar.  It goes downhill from there…  WATCH:

This interview is a great example of the election fear carried by leftists.  Despite evidence of severe issues within the 2020 outcome, the legitimacy of the election is the priority of democrats to protect.  Anyone who points out the valid election questions is a threat that must be isolated, ridiculed, marginalized and silenced.

My last Post on a Patriot Party now appears to be incorrect

A great many trump MAGA supporters have hoped Trump would create a new party myself included but it seems that this filing, although real, is not actually associated with our Donald J. Trump. I will continue to research this but at this point in time it seems I was given bad information from a source of mine that is almost never wrong.

Even if this patriot party is not real it doesn’t change my feeling about the current Republican party. I will never vote for them again after what they did to President Trump. The DC Republicans in congress in the leadership positions are worse than the Democrats for at least we knew the Democrats were corrupt.

I will post most details later today.

I apologize to all my followers and in particular the almost 5,000 that read this post over the past 18 hours for giving false hope.

Democrats Planning to Use Senate “Reconciliation” Process to Enact Amnesty Legislation

Posted originally on the conservative tree house on January 23, 2021 by Sundance

Beware… it is likely the JoeBama amnesty plan will pass through the Senate in exactly the same way as Obamacare.  Through manipulation of the budgetary reconciliation process.

According to numerous outlets the JoeBama amnesty legislation has been created by the White House for congressional approval.

The House will likely pass such a proposal along party lines, just like ObamaCare; and then it goes to the Senate where Chuck Schumer will likely do the same reconciliation process to pass amnesty with a simple majority.

By stripping out a budget bill of substance, or using a COVID relief bill, the Senate amnesty bill will be inserted.  It will pass along party lines and then be reconciled with the same amnesty bill from the House.  The conniving leftists will do anything regardless of public support.

Watch carefully for them to move the execution of this up right after the House sends the impeachment article to the Senate.  They will use the period between receiving the article and the February 8th trial to pull-off this amnesty scheme when everyone is distracted. It’s how they roll.  Remember, at the time Harry Reid passed Obamacare (Dec ’09 reconciled in 2010) it was opposed by 74% of the voting electorate. They did it anyway…  Expect the same here.

(Vox) – […] The bill, known as the US Citizenship Act of 2021 and outlined in a four-page summary shared with reporters, would represent the most sweeping immigration reform package passed since 1986.

It marks both a symbolic and substantive break with the restrictionist immigration policies that have defined the last four years under Donald Trump, setting the tone for what Biden promises will be a more welcoming era for immigrants in the US. At its core is a long-awaited proposal to legalize the more than 10.5 million undocumented immigrants currently living in the US, many of whom have lived in fear of being deported and uprooted from their families for years.

It’s an early signal that the Biden administration is prioritizing immigration, despite an otherwise full agenda in Congress, including confirming the president’s Cabinet officials, conducting Trump’s impeachment trial in the Senate, and passing additional Covid-19 relief. That draws a contrast with the Obama White House, which faced criticism for squandering its best opportunity to pass comprehensive immigration reform in 2013.

“We made a mistake,” Biden said when asked about why voters should entrust him with passing comprehensive immigration reform during an October presidential debate. “It took too long to get it right.”

[…] But even if the bill doesn’t survive in its entirety, Democrats and immigrant advocates are working to ensure that at least parts of it go on to become law in other forms, including through a budget reconciliation bill, which could pass by a simple majority, and in future pandemic relief packages. (more)

DIA Purchasing Smartphone User Location Data Without Search Warrants

Posted originally on the conservative tree house on January 23, 2021 by Sundance

A rare but solid piece of reporting from the New York Times connects and outlines an issue that CTH 2.0 has been reviewing for several years with increased attention.

Essentially the U.S. security apparatus uses private sector data on cell phone users; purchasing as if they were commercial consumers of data; as part of their investigative and monitoring processes for Americans.  This is a big privacy issue that has been the subject of several hours of backroom discussion amid the CTH 2.0 tech team.

WASHINGTON — A military arm of the intelligence community buys commercially available databases containing location data from smartphone apps and searches it for Americans’ past movements without a warrant, according to an unclassified memo obtained by The New York Times.

Defense Intelligence Agency analysts have searched for the movements of Americans within a commercial database in five investigations over the past two and a half years, agency officials disclosed in a memo they wrote for Senator Ron Wyden, Democrat of Oregon.

[…] The disclosure sheds light on an emerging loophole in privacy law during the digital age: In a landmark 2018 ruling known as the Carpenter decision, the Supreme Court held that the Constitution requires the government to obtain a warrant to compel phone companies to turn over location data about their customers. But the government can instead buy similar data from a broker — and does not believe it needs a warrant to do so.

[…]  The government’s use of commercial databases of location information has come under increasing scrutiny. Many smartphone apps log their users’ locations, and the app makers can aggregate the data and sell it to brokers, who can then resell it — including to the government.

It has been known that the government sometimes uses such data for law enforcement purposes on domestic soil. (more)

On the whole this issue has been the subject of much research and discussion amid our archives.  When CTH was deplatformed by WordPress/Automattic; and anticipating a new regime in the White House would/could weaponize user data for political targeting; we began an exhaustive review of how to secure the CTH community and create a place where the rebel alliance could assemble without concern of metadata exploitation.  That effort is ongoing and more information will available soon with updates to the CTH optimization process currently underway.

Knowing the objectives of a JoeBama administration and aligned with the ideological intents of Big Tech we can easily see how “contractors” within the U.S. intelligence apparatus would likely operate as brokers to retrieve private sector information from big tech suppliers of user data.  This process allows U.S. intel organizations like the DIA to purchase information without search warrants exactly as described in the New York Times article.

When you overlay the intent of the JoeBama team to identify subversive voices, and then accept they will assign the “domestic terrorist” label to those who stand against the totalitarian policy of the regime, you can see how the privacy issue can be weaponized.

From our perspective…. Why would the government need a warrant if the information is available to anyone who wants it, for a fee or otherwise? The real solution would be to prohibit collection in the first place; anything else is chaff and countermeasures.

The Rebel Alliance is currently formulating anti-fragile technology platforms that block this intrusive exploitation.  CTH is leading this process.

Yes, there are more of us than them…. and we are smart.  Stay small, live Bigly.