Posted originally on the conservative tree house on August 6, 2021 | Sundance | 535 Comments
This is not just scientific madness, it appears to be very intentional and purposeful.
The Moderna and Pfizer vaccine tests were conducted, as customary, with a control group; a group within the trial who were given a placebo and not the test vaccine. However, during the trial -and after the untested vaccines were given emergency use authorization- the vaccine companies conducting the trial decided to break protocol and notify the control group they were not vaccinated. Almost all the control group were then given the vaccine.
Purposefully dissolving the placebo group violates the scientific purpose to test whether the vaccine has any efficacy; any actual benefit and/or safety issues. Without a control group there is nothing to compare the vaccinated group against. According to NPR, the doctors lost the control group in the Johnson County Clinicial Trial (Lexena, Kansas) on purpose:
(Via NPR) […] “Dr. Carlos Fierro, who runs the study there, says every participant was called back after the Food and Drug Administration authorized the vaccine.
“During that visit we discussed the options, which included staying in the study without the vaccine,” he says, “and amazingly there were people — a couple of people — who chose that.”
He suspects those individuals got spooked by rumors about the vaccine. But everybody else who had the placebo shot went ahead and got the actual vaccine. So now Fierro has essentially no comparison group left for the ongoing study. “It’s a loss from a scientific standpoint, but given the circumstances I think it’s the right thing to do,” he says.
People signing up for these studies were not promised special treatment, but once the FDA authorized the vaccines, their developers decided to offer the shots. (read more)
Just so we are clear, the final FDA authorization and approval for the vaccines are based on the outcome of these trials. As noted in the example above, the control group was intentionally lost under the auspices of “the right thing to do”, so there is no way for the efficacy, effectiveness or safety of the vaccine itself to be measured.
There’s no one left within the control group, of a statistically valid value, to give an adequate comparison of outcomes for vaxxed -vs- non-vaxxed.
Whiskey – Tango – Foxtrot !!! This is nuts.
That NPR article is one to bookmark when people start claiming the vaccination is effective.
How can the vaccine not be considered effective when there is no group of non-vaccinated people to compare the results to?
Good grief, the entire healthcare system is operating on a massive hive mindset where science, and the scientific method, is thrown out the window in favor of ideological outcomes and self-fulfilling prophecies. The fact that the researchers and doctors, apparently under the payroll of the pharmaceutical companies that have a vested financial interest in the vaccine outcome, lost the control group on purpose is alarming.
Of course, Big Pharma will promote the vaccine as beneficial, and the controlled media will promote that message with a complete disconnect from the clinical trial details, and the FDA will grant approval on results that were intentionally constructed to produce only one outcome.
Posted originally on the conservative tree house on August 6, 2021 | Sundance | 364 Comments
It can well be argued that New York City’s requirement for a vaccine passport is the canary in the coal mine; the test scenario to see how much real opposition exists to government mandated vaccination policies. Citizens across the nation nation are starting to realize how severe this issue has become.
There is no other hill to stand upon if medical freedom is taken away.
What is ‘freedom‘ if government can force you to inject a substance in your body? What is ‘liberty‘ if the government can force you into an unwanted medical procedure in order to live in society. The issue here is not simply a forced injection.
There is no way for us to comply ourselves out of tyranny. If we accept the government can forcibly mandate you to undergo a medical procedure, under any circumstance, as a condition to live and function in society, then we have conceded the very cornerstone of liberty. The New York City vaccination passport must be stopped.
The first organized protest is scheduled for Monday, August 9th at Noon EST.
The Location is: New York City Hall, 52 Chambers St, New York, NY 10007
Now is the time for cold anger to turn hot. Now is the time to fight:
“If ye love wealth better than liberty, the tranquility of servitude better than the animating contest of freedom, go home from us in peace. We ask not your counsels or arms. Crouch down and lick the hands which feed you. May your chains set lightly upon you, and may posterity forget that ye were our countrymen.” ~ Samuel Adams
I find it amazing how stupid people can be. Those claiming if everyone just got vaccinated, we would all go back to normal. I know there were Jews in Germany who left early looking at the trend that was emerging and made it to the United States. They told me people were ridiculing them when they left saying it would all blow over and go back to normal. These types of people do not look at what is going on in any depth. They take whatever is said at face value and do not look at motives or connect the dots.
In Australia, the number of people is rising up. The police in Australia are still violating human rights and supporting the decline and fall of Australia as it descends into tyranny. The protest has erupted again in Melbourne and until the police stop enforcing orders that are inconsistent with international law, there is no hope for Australia. It continues to slide toward an economic apocalypse. They are 110% on board with the Great Reset and those behind the curtain view that if they can end mining and resources in Australia, they will save the planet and bring about the Great Reset.
The TWO primary countries they want to totally suppress are Australia and Brazil.
According to American Frontline Doctors, 62% of those vaccinated develop blood clots, and they claim that life expectancy maybe 3 years. Moderna’s groundbreaking coronavirus vaccine was designed in just 2 days. They also acknowledge that was POSSIBLE only because they were working with Bill Gates previously.
Look, I am not a doctor. I will leave that to others. What I can see strategically is this is being politically manipulated. I have known people with COVID and could not taste. They got over it in a week. A friend was vaccinated and just came home after 2 weeks in the hospital with some strange development where first they thought it was a stroke, then a heart attack, and then kidney failure. It was like something strange infected him and it was running around his body. NOBODY could say what it was, which makes me think it was the vaccine rather than some mysterious disease never seen before that somehow he caught from a visiting alien.
There is something seriously wrong with this entire picture. Once politicians got involved and Gates was allowed to fund the CDC, FDA, and NIH. There is ABSOLUTELY no possible way of knowing the truth. We are the great unwashed and that is how those in the office view us from above. We are tolerated at best, and they are now breaking the chains that once made them responsible to the people.
I have learned over the years to look at patterns in how people behave. Bill Gates was forced out of Microsoft because, as I believe, he was deliberately creating a monopoly and sought to put the competition out of business. He is displaying the very same thing now with the healthcare industry. He controlled the programs that said 33% of the world was about to die, funded Imperial College which recommended lockdowns, and then he controls the vaccine companies while his coconspirator using his influence to control politicians with the WEF.
Gates and his father’s obsession with overpopulation demonstrate that they do not understand the cycle of nature and believe they possess the power, intelligence, and money/influence to change the world to BUILD BACK BETTER as he thinks it should be.
There are a lot of doctors who read these posts, and there are doctors I know and can vouch for as being real. This is an email from one such person I can personally vouch for. In every field, we have people who are actually good at what they do, and others who simply repeat what they read. In economics, I can vouch that we have the same problem. There are those who are only academics who have NEVER even traded no less tried to expand their understanding.
I have said before that I was speaking at I believe the Market Technicians conference in Chicago or perhaps Computrac. To my shock, Milton Friedman came to listen to me. While Milton was an academic, he made an effort like Adam Smith to explore the real world beyond the theoretical pontificating. So there are some on the research side who realize they must look at how things are truly applied.
This note from a reader I know is one of the good guys, expresses the same observation in medicine I have witnessed in politics and economics. Nobody prior to 1902 had a degree in economics, for at best it was a side discussion in ethics. Not even John Maynard Keynes had a degree in economics. Keep that in mind.
Marty,
As you know, I am a doctor, and have been practicing medicine, and treating patients for 21 years. I have seen many new medications being developed and released to the public over my career. I also know many other doctors. One thing I can say is that probably 85-95% of doctors are honest people who work, and want to improve peoples’ lives. However, we all know that we’re not always 100% successful.
However, it’s also important to understand that there are doctors and then there are “doctors”. Some doctors do not practice medicine, and just do research, or are administrators, or political appointees. Most doctors that actually practice medicine work with their patients to accomplish positive outcomes. Doctors who are administrators or appointees generally do not care to deal with patients, and that is why they are in administration. I do not have any interaction with these latter type of doctors, but I would say that their actual knowledge about treating people is rather limited. They are generally more interested in fundraisers, etc. I think it would be safe to say that it is more important to listen to a doctor that actually has experience, and treats patients. I think it would also be safe to say that you could probably ignore at least half the things that an administrator or appointee says.
One of the many things I will occasionally comment about with my patients is that there are two parts of the body that we, as doctors in the field of medicine don’t really have a good grasp on: 1. the immune system, and 2. the brain.
Anytime we are dealing with the immune system, there will always be a degree of uncertainty greater than we are used to dealing with. Vaccines deal with the immune system. While our treatments for most of the body, may be 99% effective (which are the results that most modern doctors are used to), our treatments when dealing with the immune system or the brain may only be 50-70% effective.
I can also say that the doctors that are currently promoting the vaccine as “safe and effective” actually think that it is safe and effective, as many doctors don’t think too critically about anything anymore, but just accept whatever they’re told or whatever they read. Many of these doctors are simply too busy treating their patients to stop and think, and then when they get home, they are busy with their families.
The COVID vaccine may very well have some side effects that we are not currently aware of. The problem is that we need time and numbers to see any correlations. I would generally say that by 3 years from now, there should be enough data to assess any side effect associated with the COVID vaccines (assuming it is not censored), as that is generally the time frame that we have needed in the past to correlate a rare side effect from a medication.
Insofar as the virus itself is concerned, I would agree that this is a real virus. We do not culture this virus, because if we grow it in a lab, then lab personnel could be infected. Consequently, we rely on lab tests to establish a diagnosis. No lab test in medicine has ever been 100% accurate. The main terminology we use for discussing the accuracy of a lab test is “sensitivity” and “specificity”, among other terms to discuss how reliable a test may or may not be. There will always be false positive results and false negative results, no matter the test, and that is where having the medical acumen becomes important.
While wearing medical masks may very well help insofar as preventing people from coughing all over each other, we all know that masks will not be 100% effective either.
Yes, I would suggest not getting distracted by all these irrelevant details in the field of medicine, as no one knows all the details yet, and we may possibly never know the details. This is not the plague (with a 50% mortality rate), nor is it smallpox (with a 10% mortality rate). It is a respiratory virus.
Thanks for covering the world’s events, and informing us about lesser known events in history!
QUESTION #1: Do you think we are living in the end times? It seems like they are trying to absolutely control every aspect of our lives with cryptocurrencies to depopulation. Any thoughts?
REPLY: I realize a lot of people are drawing that correlation to religious prophecies be it Christain or Muslim. Virtually every religion sees this battle between good and evil. On that score, we all have a common agreement. Socrates cannot make a religious prophecy and nobody speaks to me even in dreams from above. What Socrates is capable of doing is addressing the cycles that even drive the rise and fall of religions as well as nations. On that score, we have indeed reached a crossroads where there is a major clash unfolding between the right and left which are keeping laced with religious beliefs for some that God exists and others who are Atheists and believe the future is to be shaped in their hands because there is no higher power. The Communists turning 46,000 churches and synagogues into atheist museums. This is what 2032 is about. It is a major confrontation that is shaping up which many have seen as the battle between good and evil.
QUESTION #2: Hi Above is the link to the Originating Application on the Patrick King court case where Dr Deena Hinshaw could not or would not present her evidence of the isolation of SARS-CoV2 virus from a deceased human. In so doing they lost the right to use Covid as an excuse to lockdown the people of Alberta. Would you say this is the first domino to fall? I understand the CDC just came out to say that the PCR tests will no longer be used and that they have until Dec to change to a different test. if this is true would this be the 2nd domino to fall? Hope all is well, S
REPLY: Yes. The issue is that even the PCR test is invalid. I have stated that I was tested five times and it was negative. Then 2 doctors told me that was irrelevant, and they both thought I had COVID and got over it based on an x-ray of my lungs. This whole thing has a lot of holes and when Draghi moved to prevent voting without the vaccine, this was a serious event that shows this is contrived and has been exploited for political purposes. Based upon inside information from the start, I have believed this was deliberately pulled off because the economic system is collapsing. This is why a lot of smart money is bailing out of bonds and headed to the private sector. The amount of money in bonds is at least 10x that of equities.
QUESTION #3: Estimado Sr. Amstorng , soy un admirador de su trabajo y agradecido por su valentia estos años. Le escribo porque considero que está perdiendo un poco el norte al no considerar el verdadero origen de esta pandemia , así como sus herramientas. Repetidamente le veo soslayar el hecho de que la gente esta muriendo por la vacuna sin que usted entre a valorar qué contiene esa pócima. Le ruego eche un vistazo a LA QUINTA COLUMNA .NET que desde España está llevando a cabo una verdadera revelación sobre el contenido de las vacunas , GRAFENO, descubriendo incluso que lo tenemos hasta en la agricultura y los alimentos cotidianos ,desde hace varios años. Si no entra Usted a valorar estos aspectos y los incluye en Socrates , me temo que no entenderá la verdadera maniobra de robo de soberania . Le envio un grato saludo. Fdo.: Vicente.
REPLY: I am aware that there are people asserting that there is graphite in these vaccines. I have also seen slides of blood taken from a vaccinated person showing the red cells are clumped together compared to an unvaccinated. They would NOT be making vaccines mandatory for a disease that has a kill ratio of less than 1% on par with the flu if there was not a political objective. Socrates looks at the trend, capital flows, etc. It does not require that reason, it looks at the response to this trend be it graphite or not.
This is a battle for humanity and our very way of life. Throughoughout history there have always been swings toward evil and the totalitarian state as people think they are God. Personally, why they are not satisfied simply enjoying life and must tell everyone else what to do and control them is to be some genetic defect. My personal philosophy has been simple: you leave me alone and I will leave you alone. Any animal will attack and defend itself when cornered.
QUESTION #4: I have been reading intently about whether or not the virus is “isolated.” I realize that you believe it has been but that one way or the other, it really doesn’t matter. I think the reason people want to know the truth, is because it will help them know who has the facts, who is telling the truth. There is sooooo much confusion out there right now. However, the real reason for my writing is if the virus hasn’t been isolated, wouldn’t that be grounds for a lawsuit? A Canadian man has won his case in court on these grounds. The Canadian health dept couldn’t prove it was isolated and if it isn’t isolated, how could they do these things to us…lockdowns, masks, vaccines, etc.? It’s like smashing the whole purpose to pieces. Please comment on this in your blog. I’m not the only one thinking this.
REPLY: I believe this has been engineered and that was the first comment in that Fauci email to him. There is a genetic sequence that sparked that comment. What I believe is that saying it is not “isolated” is also tangled up in the fact that this is “engineered” and was NOT a normal virus that found its way from bats to humans magically in Wuhan. I also believe that the Chinese may have tried to cover the release up fearing they would be blamed, but they DID NOT deliberately release this. They have not gained from that. Others have benefitted from that release and I believe they bribed someone in Wuhan to release it to further this Great Reset agenda to save the West from economic collapse since they cannot keep borrowing from the public.
I am not sure the argument should be over this is isolated or not. It should be about it was engineered and thus it does not fit a normal virus which is what they comment was really saying it “appeared to be engineered” meaning it was not natural.
There is a huge debate over the COVID-19 and if this is real or not. But this ends up being a distraction because it is a tool, real or not, that is being used to eliminate human rights and end democracy. That is the end goal because the CURRENT system of borrowing endlessly requires the public to buy their debt. When they lowered interest rates in Europe to NEGATIVE in 2014, that Keynesian measure failed. Here we are in 2021 and the rates are still NEGATIVE and there was no recovery yet they destroyed the bond market. There is no going back. They now need to destroy capitalism and move to authoritarianism to retain power but using COVID as scare tactics.
I do not see arguing over COVID existence will help. They are going to impose booster shots and then require COVID passports with renewed shots at least annually if not every 6 months. Some people are dying right now. Others have been seriously injured from these vaccines. The vast majority have not been and they are winning the battle getting people to be vaccinated thinking that is the only way to freedom. But this is not going to end with one shot.
The question becomes with the majority surviving this vaccine now, they will line up for the next shot and every one thereafter. They can change the objective of the vaccines at any time. A vaccine can target a specific genetic code and sequence causing illness in that specific group.
The bigger question is tyranny. Arguing COVID has not been identified is not going to win the day. Stanley Milgram’s experiment putting just one person staring into the sky people assumed he was crazy and passed by. Put 5 people there staring at absolutely nothing in the sky, and a crowd forms. People believe it exists. Nothing need even be there. The only way to win this battle is to target the loss of freedom, jobs, and transforming society. The only right to vote will be local. From above, they will not be subject to democracy any more than the head of the EU is elected.
I believe they have created the perfect tool for tyranny and their end goal is supreme power ending democracy precisely as the WEF has told you. We can debate if COVID exists or not, and in the meantime, we wake up and everything is gone. They are already imposing tyranny on the children who have no right to vote but their regulations impact them. This is their dream state – complete authoritarian rule because socialism is collapsing unable to borrow to fund the promises. Welcome MMT.
QUESTION: Has this virus been isolated? So many say it has not but how can it be engineered if it is not isolated?
SJ
ANSWER: It has been identified/isolated. I am not sure why people claim it was not. It was created in a lab, that much I am pretty well convinced. Even in the emails released with Fauci, they said it looked engineered and that was silenced. It could not be engineered without isolation. If it was not “isolated” then how could it have been engineered?
Moreover, I have reported that this was orchestrated and the release was in December 2019. The Gates Foundation first bought a position in BioNTech, maker of vaccines, in September 2019 just 2 months ahead of the announcement of COVID released in Wuhan in December 2019 – perfect timing. The World Economic Forum, I believe, sold all its stock and bonds weeks before the COVID Crash.
COVID-19 has been identified in order to do this. I am not sure why it even makes a difference, for you will never stop these people claiming somehow it is not real. This is simply a tool for tyranny. (see also: Reuters) and then see Cowan)
Posted originally on the conservative tree house on August 5, 2021 | Sundance | 357 Comments
Earlier this week, the installed occupant of the White House, Joe Biden, said he would not interfere with the FDA process for approving the controversial COVID-19 vaccines {nudge, nudge – wink, wink}; however, he anticipated approval “mid fall” of this year.
Right on cue, leaks from “people familiar with the matter” tell the New York Times the Pfizer vaccine will get approval around September 6th.
WASHINGTON, Aug 3 (Reuters) – The U.S. Food and Drug Administration is aiming to give full approval for the Pfizer (PFE.N) COVID vaccine by early September, the New York Times reported on Tuesday, citing people involved in the effort.
The FDA gave emergency use authorization to the Pfizer vaccine late last year. Full approval by the FDA could push more Americans to get the COVID-19 vaccine as it might reduce their fears about the safety of the shot. (read more)
Honestly, the issue of the vaccine gaining FDA final approval is essentially moot. Think about it…. of course the FDA will approve the vaccine, what other option do they have? Can you imagine the consequences of the FDA saying they will not approve a vaccine that has been pushed, forced and demanded by this radical leftist government?
There is no way for the FDA to not approve the vaccine after millions of Americans have been forced to subject themselves to the human test trial.
Posted originally on the conservative tree house on August 5, 2021 | Sundance | 849 Comments
One of the more commonsense approaches to reviewing COVID-19 data, amid the outbreak of the ‘Delta variant’, is to look at the percentage of vaccinated people in a regional population, and then look at the percentage of vaccinated people in the hospital with “covid related” symptoms. [Obviously, the presumption is – if the COVID illness is severe enough to require hospitalization, then the patient is severely or acutely sick.]
A review of Los Angeles and San Francisco, California, area populations/hospitalizations previously showed the percentage of hospitalized COVID patients with the vaccine is identical to the percentage of people vaccinated in the population served by the hospital. The same data was reflected in the statistics released by Public Health Scotland (link). The percentage of vaccinated people hospitalized is identical to the percentage of people vaccinated in the population.
♦ What does that mean?
Quite simply, it means the vaccine provides no benefit with a COVID-19 illness severe enough to require hospitalization. So, if the vaccine provides no benefit then why take it, that’s the bottom line question. Before going deeper, firstwatch this video segment:
Since that video and discussion above took place in May 2020, we now have a massive number of people who have been vaccinated. Additionally, and perhaps more importantly, we also now have the data on those vaccinated people coming into contact with the COVID-19 virus after their vaccination (‘Delta Variant’). The data is very troubling, because it confirms what was presented in that video.
A review of a sizable data-set from Public Health Scotland shows that 87% of the deaths directly attributed to COVID-19 are amid the vaccinated population [SEE DATA].
Putting both sets of empirical data together, this is what you discover:
(1) The vaccination provides no benefit to stop the COVID-19 virus infection rate.
(2) The vaccine does not stop hospitalization from severe symptomatic illness.
(2) The vaccine does not stop severe acute respiratory failure that results from SARS-CoV-2 infection.
(3) The vaccinated population that are hospitalized and then die from COVID-19 represent 87% of all deaths.
These troubling outcomes also are confirmed by the Red Cross earlier saying: “Vaccinated people cannot contribute convalescent blood plasma to help other COVID-19 patients in hospitals. That plasma is made up of antibodies from people who have recovered from the virus, but the vaccine wipes out those antibodies; making the convalescent plasma ineffective in treating other COVID-19 patients.”
So, the second alarming question is: Does the vaccine actually create a pathway, an “antibody immune enhancement” that makes the infection more deadly?
Unfortunately, the data starting to come out now seems to say, yes. People appear to have a more severe illness when exposed to the virus after vaccination. That would explain why there is such a high percentage of deaths amid the vaccinated population after exposure.
NOTE: the mortality rate could be a matter of scale. The elderly population have a higher vaccination rate, and the elderly population have a higher hospitalization rate; ergo the older population group, a more vulnerable population group, would make up a higher percentage of people who have died from COVID related illnesses. More study seems to be urgently needed.
Overall, the COVID-19 mortality rate is lower than the flu mortality rate; and both are influenced heavily by pneumonia as the symptomatic cause of death.
♦ Ryan Christian is a researcher who has done a very deep dive into the historic CDC and WHO record of flu cases and now COVID cases. He has an extensive video presentation with dozens of citations from his data research [Main Article].
Christian’s ongoing research indicates the COVID-19 virus is no more deadly than the flu; and Christian uses a historic reference of flu deaths being over-reported and conflated. Citing a hidden 2011 report to the World Health Organization about avian H5N1 and a new A(H1N1) human influenza virus:
WHO (2011) – […] The pandemic policy was never informed by evidence, but by fear of worst-case scenarios. […] In both pandemics of fear, the exaggerated claims of a severe public health threat stemmed primarily from disease advocacy by influenza experts. In the highly competitive market of health governance, the struggle for attention, budgets and grants is fierce. (link)
HHS (2017) – US data on influenza deaths are false and misleading. The Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (CDC) acknowledges a difference between flu death and flu associated death yet uses the terms interchangeably. Additionally, there are significant statistical incompatibilities between official estimates and national vital statistics data. Compounding these problems is a marketing of fear—a CDC communications strategy in which medical experts “predict dire outcomes” during flu seasons. (link)
Those cited historic examples set the baseline to see how three different sets of illness are being conflated in 2021 to maintain a COVID-19 pandemic policy based on fear, worst case scenarios and false data.
From the CDC website they tell us that deaths from pneumonia, influenza and COVID (PIC) are all reported as COVID-19 deaths without differentiation:
CDC – “Based on NCHS mortality surveillance data available on July 29, 2021, 7.4% of the deaths that occurred during the week ending July 24, 2021 (week 29), were due to pneumonia, influenza, and/or COVID-19 (PIC). This percentage is above the epidemic threshold of 5.5% for week 29.
Among the 1,381 PIC deaths reported for this week (week 29), 642 had COVID-19 listed as an underlying or contributing cause of death on the death certificate, and one listed influenza, indicating that current PIC mortality is due primarily to COVID-19 and not influenza. The data presented are preliminary and may change as more data are received and processed.” (link)
All Pneumonia, Influenza and COVID deaths (the PIC group) are reported exclusively as COVID deaths; and all of that data is dependent on how the hospitals “code” the death. If all deaths are coded as covid deaths, then the CDC mortality data is assembled based on false baselines.
The entire presentation by Ryan Christian is worth reviewing. The discussion is wonky and somewhat in the deep weeds, but everything is massively cited with direct sourcing to back up the hypothesis. [RokFin Video Presentation Here] and his heavily censored Website is HERE.
♦ Bottom Line: COVID-19 is not more deadly than the flu UNLESS you have taken the vaccine; then it might be more dangerous. The vaccine is ineffective at stopping severe COVID illness and, data suggests, might actually make things worse…. creating a perpetual need for continued booster modifications to counteract the initial issue.
There’s something sketchy about the vaccine when contrast against this data, the CDC twisted language, and the scale of government/media pushing and requiring it.
I have created this site to help people have fun in the kitchen. I write about enjoying life both in and out of my kitchen. Life is short! Make the most of it and enjoy!
This is a library of News Events not reported by the Main Stream Media documenting & connecting the dots on How the Obama Marxist Liberal agenda is destroying America
Centinel2012 