Posted originally on Jul 16, 2025 by Martin Armstrong
Some people are reporting that Japanese researchers were able to obtain vaccine and death records for 21 million people, and determined that those who died from MNRA came in “death waves” that took place 3-4 months after the injections, not right away. The data also reveal how long it takes for your death risk to return to normal, following a covid jab. This does not appear to be verifiable.
Data from Japan has been elusive. They definitely have the information infrastructure, seen in publications with amazing detail for population studies. It is a country of ~125M, and ~1.6M die every year. So 21M would be ~13 years worth of death data. I think it’s plausible that a researcher gets that much data. I’ve seen shoddy population-wide mortality calculations before, but my guess is Japan would grant access to someone with the necessary experience. And Japan has been under a decent amount of pressure to reveal details of its excess mortality:
Okada and Nishiura had a preprint released earlier this year with significantly smaller numbers for life expectancy in 2022 compared to 2021 or 2020. A paper chock-full of pandemic awareness, and notably, the one word most conspicuously absent: “vaccine.”
Also, out of the Japanese Medical Association (JMA) Journal: “Although Japan recorded the world’s highest rate of COVID-19 messenger ribonucleic acid (mRNA) vaccination doses per capita, COVID-19 cases and deaths exploded after the emergence of the Omicron variant, followed by a significant increase in excess deaths in 2022 and 2023. Although several hypotheses have been proposed to explain these phenomena, the truth remains to be established because sufficient studies and data disclosures have not been conducted to adequately investigate the possible contribution of mRNA vaccines.”
Even I must to admit, I received inquiries when some heard I refused to be vaccinated to my surprise. I am cautious even with my dogs. Traditional rabies vaccines have been effective for decades, but advancements in biotechnology are introducing new options.
One such innovation is the mRNA-based rabies vaccine for dogs, which enhances protection and improves production. Why change something that has worked for decades if it is not broken? Make more money? Rabies in dogs has been largely eradicated in the United States. Yet the producers of vaccines have succeeded in making it a law that dogs must be vaccinated. I demand to know who makes any vaccine before they inject my dogs.
Posted originally on Jul 3, 2025 by Martin Armstrong
The biological warfare unleashed on the global population should not be a forgotten war. A new study observed miscarriages and pregnancy losses among mothers-to-be who received the COVID-19 vaccination during gestational weeks 8-13 and 14-27, respectively. Researchers also noted the impact on unborn babies of mothers injected with the influenza vaccination as a comparison.
The Israeli study analyzed 226,395 pregnancies and found that 1.1% of women lost their babies when given the COVID-19 vaccination after week 24 of pregnancy. An alarming 2.7% of women who received a COVID-19 vaccination in the early weeks of pregnancy suffered the loss of a pregnancy. The study also factored in expected losses due to natural events. Those who received dose 1 during 8-13 weeks experienced a higher-than-expected number of fetal losses of approximately 18 vs. 9 for every 100 exposed pregnancies.
Most pregnancy losses occurred after gestational week 20, with half of deaths happened after week 25. Mothers who received dose three of the vaccine during weeks 8 to 13 exhibited a higher-than-expected number of fetal deaths with nearly 1.9 (95% CI: 0.39-3.42]) additional fetal losses above expected per 100 pregnancies.
How does this compare to the typical influenza vaccination? Women vaccinated during weeks 8 to 27 of pregnancy exhibited a lower-than-expected number of fetal losses. Those who received the flu vaccine in weeks 8 to 13 had fewer losses of around 5 per 100 women vaccinated. The study also attributed this to health vaccine bias as those who received the influenzas vaccine were likely to be healthy to begin with and cleared by their doctor rather than forced by their government.
Israel has one of the highest global rates of vaccination, and although they did not issue a blanket mandate, the government provided the vaccinated with a “green pass” while shunning the others from accessing public venues. The Israeli Ministry of Health, along with every other health agency, urged pregnant women to receive the COVID-19 vaccination and explicitly advised all pregnant women in their second and third trimester to take the mRNA vaccine. The government found that women were most likely to take the untested vaccine if their physician recommended doing so. Every tactic to coerce the population into willingly accepting the vaccine was unleashed.
The Israeli Ministry of Health continues to recommend that pregnant women accept the vaccination, and if their babies survive, they can begin to take the COVID-19 vaccinations at 6 months of age. The Centers for Disease Control and Prevention and the HHS in the United States changed their recommendations in recent months and no longer encourage healthy pregnant women to take the vaccine, likely solely due to Robert F. Kennedy Jr becoming the HHS Secretary.
Today, the COVID vaccine for healthy children and healthy pregnant women has been removed from @CDCgov recommended immunization schedule. Bottom line: it’s common sense and it’s good science. We are now one step closer to realizing @POTUS’s promise to Make America Healthy Again. pic.twitter.com/Ytch2afCLP
“As of today, the COVID vaccine for healthy children and healthy pregnant women has been removed from the CDC recommended immunization schedule,” Kennedy said in May 2025. “Last year, the Biden administration urged healthy children to get yet another COVID shot despite the lack of any clinical data to support the repeat booster strategy in children.”
The COVID-19 vaccination was never a medical necessity. There were no tests or studies conducted. Global governments aligned to attack the global population with an experimental vaccine that they insisted was safe and effective.
In early 2021, the entire European Union was under lockdown. Governments were prohibiting citizens from participating in society without the vaccination, and the EU’s largest supplier at the time, AstraZeneca, was unable to meet production needs. European Commission President Ursula von der Leyen awarded Pfizer a €35 billion contract, personally, bypassing the proper channels in an apparent conflict of interest. Not only was she responsible for negotiating the deal, but she was also responsible for implementing the protocols.
In a backdoor deal, Von der Leyen negotiated the lucrative agreement directly with Pfizer CEO Albert Bourla on her personal cell phone, bypassing the traditional processes in place for transparency. Pfizer then became Europe’s leading supplier of the COVID-19 vaccine and was awarded €35 billion in public funds. All of this was done secretly and highlighted the immense power that Ursula had amassed through a growing centralized government–she is no longer pretending that there is a democracy in the EU. There were Hillary’s emails, and now there are Von der Leyen’s text messages to Bourla.
The New York Times journalist Matina Stevis-Gridneff first broke the story in April 2021, revealing that Bourla and Von der Leyen had been personally corresponding for a month before the EU, represented by Ursula alone, awarded Pfizer and its German partner, BioNTech, the bloc’s first regulatory approval. The contract provided the EU with 900 million doses through 2023, with the option to order an additional 900 million.
Matina Stevis-Gridneff submitted a request to the European Commission for access to the text exchanges but was denied. The EC claimed they did not have access to those messages. Although she brokered a deal to provide billions in taxpayer funds to an American corporation, the court maintained that the public was not entitled to view those messages or know the nature of the deal. This completely eroded public trust and confidence, at least for those who were paying attention, and especially for those who witnessed the significant power the EU had usurped over member nations.
The case later went to the EU’s General Court, which concluded that the European Commission’s claim that it did not possess the requested text messages demonstrated a lack of credibility and transparency, declaring that those messages should be considered official EU documents. “The public has a right to know how this deal was made, and that includes text messages with the Pfizer CEO,” the court ruled. Watchdog groups hailed the ruling as a victory for transparency.
There are now members of the European Parliament who believe she should step down from her position due to the ordeal. Romanian MEP Gheorghe Piperea plans to collect the required 72 signatures and submit a no-confidence motion. Over two-thirds of MEPs present would need to collectively vote to remove von der Leyen, which could prove difficult as she secured the support of 401 of the 720 members during the last election. However, her popularity is waning, and politics are increasingly divisive. The bureaucrats in the European Union wield immense power over all member nations to the point that individual European countries have no sovereignty.
The Make America Healthy Again (MAHA) movement has opened the public’s eyes to the truth surrounding the COVID-19 plandemic and authoritative mandates that permanently damaged public health and confidence in governments. The Food and Drug Administration announced it will no longer recommend the COVID-19 vaccine to children and pregnant women, while also stating that vaccine manufacturers must list the known risks of their so-called “safe and effective” mRNA concoctions. The public is beginning to see the truth.
A new study found that 51% of Americans believe the COVID-19 vaccines led to heart issues. Around 69% of Republicans, 39% of Democrats, and 49% of independents now admit that the vaccine caused serious health implications that could permanently damage the heart. The same poll found that only half of respondents believe the mRNA vaccine should remain on the market, and only 35% admitted to taking the annual booster shot.
In September 2021, all businesses with 100 employees or more were required to take the vaccine or undergo weekly testing. Employers could fire employees for refusing to take the vaccine. All federal employees, including military members, were forced to take the vaccine under Biden’s orders. “I call on business leaders to immediately join those who have already stepped up—including one third of Fortune 100 companies—and institute vaccination requirements to protect their workers, customers, and communities,” Biden said after the Supreme Court ruled in January 2022 that it would be unconstitutional to force large companies to mandate the vaccine.
Anyone who spoke out against the vaccine was silenced, deplatformed, debanked, or worse. The CDC, FDA, HHS, and VIS all insisted that the vaccine was “safe and effective.” The public bought the narrative.
By June 2021, 65% of adults in the US had received at least one dose of the vaccine, with the figure rising to 72.8% by December of that year. Do not forget that they attempted to wear us down to coerce us into taking the vaccine. By June 2022, it is estimated that 77% to 81% of the US population had received at least one dose of the vaccine. States with stricter measures saw higher rates of vaccination. By mid-2022, 8 in 10 Americans had undergone the largest pharmaceutical study in human history.
Not everyone willingly took the vaccine, but the general consensus was that it was “safe and effective.” Half of Americans now believe that the vaccine did contain dangers that were hidden from the public. People are finally beginning to open their eyes to the truth surrounding 2020. Many are advising Trump to pull the vaccine from the shelves entirely, but there are still some who vehemently believe in the narrative. We had people creating identities based on the vaccination, like Governor Kathy Hochul wearing a “vaxed” necklace, and others who felt they were saving the planet by adhering to protocol. People were placing vaxxed bumper stickers on their cars, flying flags, and even donning jewelry to tell the world they were willing sheep. Under 25% of American adults and 14% of children received a COVID booster this year. While the core group that supports the mRNA vaccine will always exist, it is a far cry from 2022, when 80% of the population was taking this unknown drug. Skepticism is safe and effective.
Posted originally on May 7, 2025 by Martin Armstrong
(The Wuhan Institute of Virology)
America will no longer fund gain-of-research studies, thanks to an executive order implemented by Donald Trump that “will drastically reduce the potential for lab-related incidents involving gain-of-function research, like that conducted on bat coronaviruses in China by the EcoHealth Alliance and Wuhan Institute of Virology.” As a reminder, the Wuhan lab where COVID-19 originated is still operating in China.
“For decades, policies overseeing gain-of-function research on pathogens, toxins, and potential pathogens have lacked adequate enforcement, transparency, and top-down oversight,” the White House said in a fact sheet describing the order. “Researchers have not acknowledged the legitimate potential for societal harms that this kind of research poses.”
The US federal government spent over $3.7 million through the National Institutes of Health (NIH) on grants to EcoHealth Alliance. Around $600,000 was directly sent to Wuhan Institute of Virology to study coronaviruses on bats. The funds were distributed in 2014 under a five-year grant during the Obama Administration.
Domestic and global terrorist Dr. Anthony Fauci once claimed before Congress that the NIH “has not ever and does not now fund gain-of-function research in the Wuhan Institute of Virology.” There are emails from February 2020 in which Fauci clearly states he is aware of the gain-of-function research happening in Wuhan. “[S]cientists in the Wuhan University are known to have been working on gain-of-function experiments … associated with bat viruses adapting to human infection,” his email stated, also adding, “there were mutations in the virus that would be most unusual to have evolved naturally in the bats and that there was a suspicion that this mutation was intentionally inserted.” The email was sent to Francis Collins, the director of the National Institutes of Health, and Brian Harrison, the chief of staff of the Department of Health and Human Services. He urges the men to ask the World Health Organization to investigate the pandemic origins before the lab leak theory reaches the public.
Interestingly, Moderna and the National Institute of Allergy and Infectious Diseases (NIAID) sent mRNA coronavirus vaccine candidates to the University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill on December 12, 2019. They were secretly developing a vaccine BEFORE the coronavirus was released.
The Wuhan lab in China is STILL studying coronaviruses on bats. In 2025, Chinese researchers found a new bat coronavirus, HKU5-CoV-2, which can infect human cells. Wuhan scientists have said they plan to continue studying this virus by breeding mice with human cells and tissues to study infection. China refuses to admit that COVID-19 originated in its lab, and thus, we should not expect any further safety measures in Wuhan, a densely populated city with over 8 million residents.
The Wuhan lab is part of the Chinese Academy of Sciences (CAS), which is state-sponsored and controlled by the State Council of the People’s Republic of China. The European Union sent the lab €161,811 in 2015 and 2019 for projects related to the European Virus Archive under Horizon 2020 research programs. In fact, the Netherlands has studied gain-of-function research n the H5N1 avian influenza virus. Led by Ron Fouchier, scientists genetically modified the avian flu so that it could spread between mammals through respiratory droplets. Again, they claimed that the goal was to see what could happen if the bird flu became transmissible to humans, but that was not happening in the wild. Fouchier found himself in a legal battle with the Dutch government where it was ruled a permit was mandatory for such experiments. Japan has also conducted gain-of-function research on the avian flu, modifying the virus to study how it could infect humans.
The Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (CDC), National Institutes of Health (NIH) campus, and University of Wisconsin-Madison were all studying gain-of-function research in the United States. Now, the US government will no longer fund these studies, however, they may continue without federal funding. The executive order also entails that advanced transparency is required for these studies, but the truth of the matter is that no one knows the true implications.
From the start, I warned that COVID was not a biological weapon or its kill-ratio would have been much higher. I believe it was orchestrated and someone was simply paid to release it from Wuhan and that did NOT come from the Chinese government but from this same group pushing the Great Reset. I also KNOW for a fact that the Build-Back-Better slogan was being thrown around at Davos at the beginning of 2019 about one year before COVID was released.
Event 201. The world has widely ignored the October 18, 2019 simulation, co-sponsored by Bill Gates, the World Economic Forum, and John Hopkins. The 3.5 hour simulation depicted a coronavirus outbreak that passed from bats to pigs to people. In the simulation, the virus spread rapidly throughout the globe, overwhelming health systems and killing economies.
“The Event 201 scenario
Event 201 simulates an outbreak of a novel zoonotic coronavirus transmitted from bats to pigs to people that eventually becomes efficiently transmissible from person to person, leading to a severe pandemic. The pathogen and the disease it causes are modeled largely on SARS, but it is more transmissible in the community setting by people with mild symptoms.
The disease starts in pig farms in Brazil, quietly and slowly at first, but then it starts to spread more rapidly in healthcare settings. When it starts to spread efficiently from person to person in the low-income, densely packed neighborhoods of some of the megacities in South America, the epidemic explodes. It is first exported by air travel to Portugal, the United States, and China and then to many other countries. Although at first some countries are able to control it, it continues to spread and be reintroduced, and eventually no country can maintain control.
There is no possibility of a vaccine being available in the first year. There is a fictional antiviral drug that can help the sick but not significantly limit spread of the disease.
Since the whole human population is susceptible, during the initial months of the pandemic, the cumulative number of cases increases exponentially, doubling every week. And as the cases and deaths accumulate, the economic and societal consequences become increasingly severe.
The scenario ends at the 18-month point, with 65 million deaths. The pandemic is beginning to slow due to the decreasing number of susceptible people. The pandemic will continue at some rate until there is an effective vaccine or until 80-90 % of the global population has been exposed. From that point on, it is likely to be an endemic childhood disease.”
Bill Gates, John Hopkins, and the WEF recommended the following after the simulation:
Governments, international organizations, and businesses should plan now for how essential corporate capabilities will be utilized during a large-scale pandemic.
Industry, national governments, and international organizations should work together to enhance internationally held stockpiles of medical countermeasures (MCMs) to enable rapid and equitable distribution during a severe pandemic.
Countries, international organizations, and global transportation companies should work together to maintain travel and trade during severe pandemics. Travel and trade are essential to the global economy as well as to national and even local economies, and they should be maintained even in the face of a pandemic.
Governments should provide more resources and support for the development and surge manufacturing of vaccines, therapeutics, and diagnostics that will be needed during a severe pandemic.
Global business should recognize the economic burden of pandemics and fight for stronger preparedness.
International organizations should prioritize reducing economic impacts of epidemics and pandemics.
Governments and the private sector should assign a greater priority to developing methods to combat mis- and disinformation prior to the next pandemic response.
These global agencies told us what they planned to do a year before the pandemic, down to silencing dissent and misinformation. Gates spent $1.75 billion on vaccine research and trials before the virus emerged. Nations adhering to the Great Reset attempted to maintain COVID mandates for as long as possible. The United States government now recognizes that COVID did, in fact, develop in the Wuhan lab and was leaked to the public. How that leak occurred remains a mystery.
Posted originally on May 2, 2025 by Martin Armstrong
COVID-19 has become a repressed memory to the majority. I have not forgotten the injustice caused by the hands of belligerent politicians who have never faced justice for their crimes against humanity. One of endless aspects of injustice occurred at the hands of Democratic governors who insisted that infected elderly patients be sent back to nursing home facilities, resulting 1 in 10 nursing home residents dying from the virus.
Minnesota Governor Tim Walz has certainly been vocal about Trump being authoritarian. Yet, no one has charged him for forcing COVID-infected patients into nursing homes. Over 80% of COVID deaths in Minnesota occurred in nursing home facilities, yet Walz takes no responsibility. “This was what everyone was doing. This was not a mistake,” the failed Democrat VP nominee stated. He issued fines up to $1,000 or 90 days in jail for anyone found guilty of violating his stay-at-home lockdown. Then, of course, there was his infamous COVID hotline for people to report on their neighbors for failing to adhere to Walz’s orders. Walz claimed, “[O]ne person’s socialism is another person’s neighborliness.” This man would have been the second-most powerful person in the nation had Kamala won the election.
Andrew Cuomo of New York was the only governor to face a public trial after his policies led to 15,000 nursing home deaths. The Select Subcommittee on the Coronavirus Pandemic found Cuomo guilty of covering up his involvement in the matter and falsifying records, yet he faced no charges for his crimes.
New Jersey Governor Phil Murphy insisted that the elderly be sent back to nursing care facilities to alleviate hospital overcrowding. As a result, over 50% of COVID deaths in the state occurred in long-term care facilities, and 17% of residents in these facilities passed away, surpassing 15,000 people. He has not been charged.
Michigan Governor Gretchen Whitmer enforced policies that exposed the state’s most vulnerable population to the virus. As a result. 5% of nursing home resident died or around 2,000 people. She has not been charged.
California’s Governor Gavin Newsom initially followed New York’s policy of forcing the sick back into long-term care facilities, but quickly changed course as the death toll began to rise. Too little, too late as 2% of residents or around 2,000 people passed away. He has not been charged.
Pennsylvania Governor Tom Wolf forced COVID-positive elderly patients back into nursing homes. Half of the state’s COVID deaths occurred in these facilities, with reported outbreaks occurring at 407 state facilities. The total death toll has not been made public. He has not been charged.
There should be no COVID amnesty. The same politicians are now claiming that Trump is dismantling our society, yet they take no responsibility for what they did during the COVID-19 pandemic.
Posted originally on CTH on May 1, 2025 | Sundance
In this segment of a remarkable interview by MeAgain Kelly, DNI Tulsi Gabbard discusses the current intelligence community research into the origin of the SARS-CoV-2 pandemic (aka COVID-19). Gabbard talks about the U.S. government funding of ‘gain of function’ research which is a soft sounding phrase to describe the weaponization of biological agents.
Gabbard notes the gain of function research taking place in the Wuhan lab, was coordinated and funded by the United States Government, and the Intelligence Community is close to making a direct link between the research and the release of the COVID-19 virus. Additionally, DNI Gabbard explains the concern of other biolabs around the world and then gets very close to the line of admitting the IC itself is politically weaponized (which it is but would be stunning to admit). WATCH:
I have created this site to help people have fun in the kitchen. I write about enjoying life both in and out of my kitchen. Life is short! Make the most of it and enjoy!
This is a library of News Events not reported by the Main Stream Media documenting & connecting the dots on How the Obama Marxist Liberal agenda is destroying America
Centinel2012 