Clintons Subpoenaed Over Epstein Ties


Posted originally on Nov 24, 2025 by Martin Armstrong |  

ClintonEpsteinMaxwell

The House Oversight Committee ordered Bill and Hillary Clinton to appear in court for depositions in December regarding their relationship with Jeffrey Epstein and Ghislaine Maxwell. The Clintons have always represented the peak of the political establishment, and with that comes a long trail of scandals. Will the Clintons finally have their day in court?

“Given the admission that your clients possess some relevant information, your position amounts to a demand that the Committee forgo in-person testimony, potentially relevant to its legislative oversight,” the powerful GOP chairman said.

David Kendall, acting attorney for the Clintons, claims the Clintons fully condemn Epstein’s actions and understand the public’s need for transparency. “Former President Clinton and former Secretary Clinton welcome legitimate oversight in this matter that is grounded in fact,” Kendall added, followed by downplaying his clients’ relationship to Maxwell and Epstein.

The committee insisted that the Clintons appear in court. “Additionally, your suggestion that your clients’ testimony would not be relevant to the stated purposes of the Committee’s investigation because the events in question took place outside of the Clintons’ respective official duties misses the Committee’s point,” Comer added. “It is precisely the fact that President Clinton and Secretary Clinton each maintained relationships with Mr. Epstein and Ms. Maxwell in their personal capacities as private citizens that is of interest to the Committee.”

Clinton Bill Monica

Interestingly, the court of public opinion has always been far more interested in personal matters than actual crimes against humanity. Clinton affiliates have a high suicide rate. Bill’s administration was littered with issues from his mishandling of Al-Qaeda to Whitewater and the banking scandal. Haiti, Russia, accepting bribes from Chinese nationals—the list of corruption on a global scale was endless during Bill’s leadership and continued as Hillary took over. Yet, the blood on their hands is less remembered than a stain on a dress. The court of public opinion was most concerned about his affair with Monica Lewinsky.

ClintonEpsteinIsland

The sexual debauchery that took place on Epstein’s island caused a public uproar; the people will not let the government dismiss this case. As for their connection to Epstein, the Clintons used his intricate ties to create RussiaGate and infiltrate not only public perception of Trump but also foreign governments’ perception of Trump. The public is not interested in these matters per se, but they do want to know why the Clintons were personally associated with Epstein and Maxwell. That picture of Bill Clinton hanging on Epstein Island has been viewed worldwide.

Al Capone was arrested for tax evasion. Former Nazi war criminals were arrested in the US for evading immigration officials. And now, the Clintons are being called to answer for lesser crimes that could bring their extensive legacy of destruction to light. The significance of the Clintons being called to testify is not about whether they did or did not engage in wrongdoing at Epstein’s properties. The real significance is that the system is no longer capable of protecting its former kings and queens.

Trust in US Media Plunges to Record Low


Posted originally on Oct 7, 2025 by Martin Armstrong |  

Fake News TV

Legacy media exists to promote propaganda and political agendas. The 24/7 365 news cycle acts as a distraction from the topics plaguing society. The revolution will not be televised. Truth must be decoded and extracted from outside sources. Americans have woken up and realized that the mainstream media is an untrustworthy source.

The latest Gallup poll has found that the majority of Americans now distrust the media. Only 28% of respondents have a “great deal” or “fair amount” of trust in newspapers, television, and radio. The figure seems high considering everything that has unfolded since the pandemic.

Around 31% of respondents trusted the media one year ago. Amid COVID in 2020, 40% of respondents held onto hope that the mainstream media was a reliable news source. Seven in 10 Americans reported that they do not have confidence in the mass media. Around 36% reported they have “not very much” confidence, while 34% reported “none at all.”

mediabrainwashing

Gallup noted that Americans had a much higher level of confidence in the media back in the day. Around 70% of US adults trusted TV, radio, and newspapers to deliver reliable information back in the 1970s. That figure plummeted to 53% by 1997 and fell beneath the 50% level in 2004. The latest reading from September 2-16, 2025, indicated the lowest confidence on record.

There is one conservative news outlet in America, and naturally, Republicans have far lower confidence in reporting. MSM confidence among Republicans plummeted to 21% in 2015 and is now at a mere 8%. A little over half (51%) of Democrats continue to trust the media, but this low has not been seen since the 2016 US Presidential Election. Less than half of Independents have trusted legacy media since 2003, with the latest poll showing a record low of 27%.

CNN Fake News Weather 2

Older Democrats are clinging to old beliefs that the legacy media is reporting on behalf of the people. Sixty-nine percent of Democrats over 65 still have confidence in broadcasting, with the figure declining ten points or more with each generation of self-reported Democratic voters. Republicans over 65 also have the highest levels of trust in the media among their peers at 17%, with young Republicans aged 18-29 expressing the second-most favorable view of mass media. In contrast, the next generation of Republicans aged 30-49 have the lowest level of confidence among any demographic at 6%. As the trend indicates, older Independents also express the highest level of confidence among their peers (42%), followed by the youngest Independent voters (29%) aged 18-29.

The days of the Sunday paper are long gone, as are the days of gathering around the TV to watch the nightly news. “Journalism” has been oversaturated by the 24/7 news cycle ,bombarding the public with messaging at every turn. One cannot step outside or interact with society without seeing messaging from the media that is often pushed discreetly. Social media has turned everyone with a phone into an independent reporter with the same video loops and messages playing in a continuous loop. The American people are fatigued by the mockingbird media, and more importantly, by the establishment’s brainwashing onslaught.

YouTube Apologizes for Biden-Era Censorship


Posted originally on Sep 30, 2025 by Martin Armstrong |  

Youtube Censor

Free speech died from COVID in 2020. Any remnants of the First Amendment were eliminated under the Biden Administration in an attempt to control the COVID narrative, and then thereafter, the 2024 US Presidential Election. META/Facebook founder Mark Zuckerberg admitted years ago that he was pressured by the Biden Administration to censor content. YouTube was heavily censored during the COVID/election era, and new information from the Counsel for Alphabet reveals how far the Biden Administration went to censor the platform.

“Senior Biden Administration officials, including White House officials, conducted repeated and sustained outreach to [YouTube] and pressed the Company regarding certain user-generated content related to the COVID-19 pandemic that did not violate its policies,” the platform admitted. Later adding, “President Biden created a political atmosphere that sought to influence the action of platforms based on their concerns regarding misinformation.

Alphabet admits to error. The platform never had a clear Community Guidelines and Terms of Service for COVID-19 information. Countless videos were removed through 2023 surrounding “election integrity” and COVID-19 censorship expanded into 2024. “It is unacceptable and wrong when any government, including the Biden Administration, attempts to dictate how the Company moderates content,” the letter concludes.

Censored by YouTube

Over one million videos were removed regarding COVID-19 misinformation. YouTube admitted to removing “tens of thousands” of videos regarding the 2020 and 2024 US Presidential elections. From July 1 to December 21, 2020, ahead of Biden entering the White House, YouTube erased 347,225 videos questioning the results of the election.

There was clearly an active and aggressive push to censor free speech. I personally had countless videos removed from YouTube during that time. Numerous media outlets warned that we could not mention COVID-19 or the elections during interviews, as they feared repercussions. Others switched to Rumble or Bitchute, where they were unable to reach as wide an audience.

Other nations laugh at America—at least they are aware their governments are censoring the news. One of the main goals of this blog is to provide the public with uncensored information that they cannot access elsewhere. I do not accept ad revenue or paid partnerships. No amount of money would entice me to bite my tongue. You can always access the honest raw truth on this platform as I am only beholden to the public, who I believe deserves to know the truth.

Google’s YouTube Settles Trump Lawsuit for $24.5 Million


Posted originally on CTH on September 30, 2025 | Sundance 

Google’s subsidiary social media platform, YouTube, has agreed to pay Donald Trump $24.5 million in a settlement resulting from the 2021 lawsuit filed over deplatforming.

President Trump will use the settlement funds to build the White House ballroom; somewhat of an irony all things considered.

Wall Street Journal – YouTube has agreed to pay $24.5 million to settle a 2021 lawsuit that President Trump brought against the company and its chief executive over its suspension of Trump’s account after that year’s riot at the U.S. Capitol, according to court papers.

The settlement makes YouTube, which is owned by Alphabet’s Google, the final Big Tech company to settle a trio of lawsuits Trump brought against social-media platforms in the months after he left the White House. Meta Platforms agreed in January to pay $25 million, most of it to a fund for Trump’s presidential library, and X agreed to pay $10 million, much of it going directly to Trump, The Wall Street Journal previously reported.

Google executives were eager to keep their settlement smaller than the one paid by rival Meta, according to people familiar with the matter. Trump’s share of the settlement—$22 million—will go to the nonprofit Trust for the National Mall, earmarked for the construction of a Mar-a-Lago-style ballroom Trump is building at the White House, according to the court documents. The White House has said the ballroom, expected to cost $200 million, would be funded by donations from Trump and “other patriot donors.” (read more)

President Trump Calls Out Lawfare General Lisa Monaco and Microsoft


Posted originally on CTH on September 27, 2025 | Sundance 

President Trump is using his office to flip the leftist ‘politically exposed persons‘ script.

Previously all PEP risk factors related to conservatives, MAGA or Trump supporters. Demonetizing, deplatforming and even debanking and blacklisting were the outcomes of left-wing political pressures.

Allies and associates of President Trump were identified and targeted by every system under the control of the leftist infrastructure in govt, media and private sector.  “Arctic Frost” is an example of govt weaponization via FBI. The Twitter Files highlighted the social media targeting, while organized license revocation, debanking, employment and economic targeting are examples in the private sector.

The PEP battlefield has been a ‘Cancel Culture’ war almost exclusively waged by the professional left until recently.  The Charlie Kirk assassination triggered a major shift in this front as conservatives began hitting back against radical leftists with economic and employment targeting against those who cheered for his death.

President Trump now joins the battle with close air support.

DONALD TRUMP – Corrupt and Totally Trump Deranged Lisa Monaco (A purported pawn of Legal Lightweight Andrew Weissmann), was a senior National Security aide under Barack Hussein Obama, and a Lawfare and Weaponization obsessed Deputy Attorney General under Crooked Joe Biden and Lisa’s Puppet “Boss” Attorney General Merrick Garland, who were all the architects of the worst ever Deep State Conspiracies against our Country (RUSSIA, RUSSIA, RUSSIA, the January 6th Hoax, the Illegal Raid on Mar-a-Lago, the Biden “Autopen” Scandal, the Documents Witch Hunt, and more!).

Monaco has been shockingly hired as the President of Global Affairs for Microsoft, in a very senior role with access to Highly Sensitive Information. Monaco’s having that kind of access is unacceptable and cannot be allowed to stand. She is a menace to U.S. National Security, especially given the major contracts that Microsoft has with the United States Government.

Because of Monaco’s many wrongful acts, the U.S. Government recently stripped her of all Security Clearances, took away all of her access to National Security Intelligence, and banned her from all Federal Properties. It is my opinion that Microsoft should immediately terminate the employment of Lisa Monaco. Thank you for your attention to this matter! President DJT. {link}

MIKE DAVIS: For Over Three Years I’ve Called For A Criminal Investigation Into The Mar-a-Lago Raid. Democrats Politicized Intel And Law Enforcement To Target Political Enemies. That Is Textbook Conspiracy


Posted originally on Rumble on By Bannon’s War Room on: September, 25, 2025

Interview: False Flags to Trigger World War 3?


Posted originally on Sep 21, 2025 by Martin Armstrong |  

Lawfare and Operatives Including Norm Eisen Using Fed Governor Lisa Cook as Tool Against Trump Administration


Posted originally on CTH on September 16, 2025 | Sundance

We see things for what they are, not what media try to have us believe.

Unlike the first term playbook, the Lawfare operation against President Trump is facing a more affirmed attack posture. Instead of Trump (T1) being on constant defense, Trump (T2) is strategically willing to be more confrontational and direct against the use of Lawfare and corrupt courts against Trump’s intended policy changes.

T2 Main Justice is still not going to the mattresses as many of us would like, and factually the DOJ and FBI operations are still a weakness in the overall war against the radical left; however, they do appear to recognize that direct aggressive confrontation is needed – despite the shortcomings in their capabilities.

In the fight between the executive authority and Federal Reserve board member Lisa Cook, the embattled fed governor is being represented by Norm Eisen. Eisen, together with Mary McCord and other ideological travelers represent Lisa Cook and are using the issue as a point of attack against executive power.

In the latest development, in a 2-1 decision [SOURCE HERE], a federal appeals court has rejected President Donald Trump’s bid to quickly fire Federal Reserve board member Lisa Cook. The two justices who decided to block Trump were appointed by Joe Biden. The justice who sided with the executive authority was appointed by President Trump.

Ultimately, this issue is going to the Supreme Court where hopefully the highest court will rule that President Trump can remove Lisa Cook for cause, because Cook falsified federal mortgage loan documents. But in the bigger picture, the issue around Cook is not as much about her unlawful conduct, as it is the value of what Cook represents in the fight against President Trump.

WASHINGTON DC – […] Judges J, Michelle Childs and Bradley Garcia, both Biden appointees, voted to leave Cook in her post, while Judge Gregory Katsas, a Trump appointee, dissented. The Department of Justice declined comment.

Last week, U.S. District Judge Jia Cobb rejected Trump’s bid to remove Cook just three years into her 14-year term, saying the president’s justification for the firing — mortgage fraud allegations that have not been adjudicated in any forum — did not meet the legal requirements to overcome laws protecting the independence of the Federal Reserve.

While the Supreme Court has repeatedly endorsed Trump’s efforts to remove executive branch officials Congress has sought to insulate from politics, the justices have signaled they view the Federal Reserve as a unique “quasi-private” institution that may put it in a different legal category.

Federal law gives Trump the power to fire members of the Federal Reserve Board of Governors “for cause,” which typically means misconduct or malfeasance on the job. Trump said he had cause to fire Cook due to allegations that she claimed in separate mortgage applications that two different homes were her primary residence, which can entitle a homeowner to lower rates. Cook has denied the allegations.

The D.C. Circuit’s majority said there was “no need” at this stage of the case for the appeals court to address whether the allegations against Cook meet the “for cause” standard to fire a Fed member or what that standard would require. Childs and Garcia agreed with Cobb’s finding that Cook’s due process rights appeared to have been violated because she wasn’t properly notified of the accusations against her and given a chance to dispute them.

In his dissent, Katsas grappled directly with the definition of “for cause” firing protections for Federal Reserve board members, concluding that the law gives the president broad power to define the “cause.”

“The Board of Governors no doubt is important, but that only heightens the government’s interest in ensuring that its Governors are competent and capable of projecting confidence into markets,” Katsas wrote. “And in empowering the President to remove Governors for cause, Congress has specifically assigned that task to the President.”

Delving into the president’s determination of cause, Katsas wrote, “would enable a potentially compromised Governor to engage in significant governmental action — such as voting on whether to adjust interest rates, which Cook says she must do tomorrow.”

The Trump administration’s expected emergency appeal will go to Chief Justice John Roberts, who oversees such appeals out of the D.C. Circuit. He’s all but certain to escalate the issue to the full court, but could issue a temporary order blocking Cook from remaining in her post while the litigation plays out. (more)

Norm Eisen left, Abbe Lowell right. Both lawyers for Lisa Cook

Norm Eisen is a well-known Lawfare operative, second only to Mary McCord in his high visibility and connections to all of the anti-Trump efforts. Eisen, like McCord, is at the center of the leftist effort to stop the Trump agenda through the manipulation of the courts, ie. ‘Lawfare.’

Lawfare and Operatives Including Norm Eisen Using Fed Governor Lisa Cook as Tool Against Trump Administration


Posted originally on CTH on September 16, 2025 | Sundance 

We see things for what they are, not what media try to have us believe.

Unlike the first term playbook, the Lawfare operation against President Trump is facing a more affirmed attack posture. Instead of Trump (T1) being on constant defense, Trump (T2) is strategically willing to be more confrontational and direct against the use of Lawfare and corrupt courts against Trump’s intended policy changes.

T2 Main Justice is still not going to the mattresses as many of us would like, and factually the DOJ and FBI operations are still a weakness in the overall war against the radical left; however, they do appear to recognize that direct aggressive confrontation is needed – despite the shortcomings in their capabilities.

In the fight between the executive authority and Federal Reserve board member Lisa Cook, the embattled fed governor is being represented by Norm Eisen. Eisen, together with Mary McCord and other ideological travelers represent Lisa Cook and are using the issue as a point of attack against executive power.

In the latest development, in a 2-1 decision [SOURCE HERE], a federal appeals court has rejected President Donald Trump’s bid to quickly fire Federal Reserve board member Lisa Cook. The two justices who decided to block Trump were appointed by Joe Biden. The justice who sided with the executive authority was appointed by President Trump.

Ultimately, this issue is going to the Supreme Court where hopefully the highest court will rule that President Trump can remove Lisa Cook for cause, because Cook falsified federal mortgage loan documents. But in the bigger picture, the issue around Cook is not as much about her unlawful conduct, as it is the value of what Cook represents in the fight against President Trump.

WASHINGTON DC – […] Judges J, Michelle Childs and Bradley Garcia, both Biden appointees, voted to leave Cook in her post, while Judge Gregory Katsas, a Trump appointee, dissented. The Department of Justice declined comment.

Last week, U.S. District Judge Jia Cobb rejected Trump’s bid to remove Cook just three years into her 14-year term, saying the president’s justification for the firing — mortgage fraud allegations that have not been adjudicated in any forum — did not meet the legal requirements to overcome laws protecting the independence of the Federal Reserve.

While the Supreme Court has repeatedly endorsed Trump’s efforts to remove executive branch officials Congress has sought to insulate from politics, the justices have signaled they view the Federal Reserve as a unique “quasi-private” institution that may put it in a different legal category.

Federal law gives Trump the power to fire members of the Federal Reserve Board of Governors “for cause,” which typically means misconduct or malfeasance on the job. Trump said he had cause to fire Cook due to allegations that she claimed in separate mortgage applications that two different homes were her primary residence, which can entitle a homeowner to lower rates. Cook has denied the allegations.

The D.C. Circuit’s majority said there was “no need” at this stage of the case for the appeals court to address whether the allegations against Cook meet the “for cause” standard to fire a Fed member or what that standard would require. Childs and Garcia agreed with Cobb’s finding that Cook’s due process rights appeared to have been violated because she wasn’t properly notified of the accusations against her and given a chance to dispute them.

In his dissent, Katsas grappled directly with the definition of “for cause” firing protections for Federal Reserve board members, concluding that the law gives the president broad power to define the “cause.”

“The Board of Governors no doubt is important, but that only heightens the government’s interest in ensuring that its Governors are competent and capable of projecting confidence into markets,” Katsas wrote. “And in empowering the President to remove Governors for cause, Congress has specifically assigned that task to the President.”

Delving into the president’s determination of cause, Katsas wrote, “would enable a potentially compromised Governor to engage in significant governmental action — such as voting on whether to adjust interest rates, which Cook says she must do tomorrow.”

The Trump administration’s expected emergency appeal will go to Chief Justice John Roberts, who oversees such appeals out of the D.C. Circuit. He’s all but certain to escalate the issue to the full court, but could issue a temporary order blocking Cook from remaining in her post while the litigation plays out. (more)

Norm Eisen left, Abbe Lowell right. Both lawyers for Lisa Cook

Norm Eisen is a well-known Lawfare operative, second only to Mary McCord in his high visibility and connections to all of the anti-Trump efforts. Eisen, like McCord, is at the center of the leftist effort to stop the Trump agenda through the manipulation of the courts, ie. ‘Lawfare.’

Bannon: “We’re Gonna Force People In The Government To Take Action Whether They Want To Or Not”


Posted originally on Rumble on By Bannon’s War Room on: September, 13, 2025