100% Of US Warming Over The Last 20 Years Is Due To Adjustments


Not to worry NASA would never lie — so I’m sure Bush did it! … lol

Tony Heller's avatarReal Climate Science

Measured US temperatures show no warming over the past 20 years, while the temperatures published by NCDC show 3.4F/century warming during that period.

ScreenHunter_928 Jul. 10 08.48

The graph below shows the difference between the average final USHCN station temperature, and the average raw USHCN station temperature. All reported warming in the US since 1994 is due to highly subjective adjustments by government scientists who personally benefit from global warming alarmism.

ScreenHunter_927 Jul. 10 08.41

View original post

Words Fail Me!!


Hey what’s the problem that payback is better then most …lol

Other Climate Tools In The President’s Arsenal


This is how he views himself … he just doesn’t have God to back him up.

Tony Heller's avatarReal Climate Science

President Barack Obama has unveiled a few of his climate tools already (Solyndra, permits to kill Bald Eagles, skyrocketing electricity costs, etc.) but he has yet to unveil his most powerful tool in the fight against sea level.

ScreenHunter_878 Jul. 06 21.50

View original post

Phunny Physics


Good post and it fits perfectly.

curryja's avatarClimate Etc.

by Judith Curry

Newtons Laws of Expertise and the 4th Law of Thermodynamics.

View original post 552 more words

Lying with Statistics: The National Climate Assessment Falsely Hypes Ice Loss in Greenland and Antarctica


We still have a few sane scientists!

Apollo Astronaut: Climate Alarmism Is the ‘Biggest Fraud in the Field of Science’


The old guys get it right — Col. Cunningham is dead on and no one can question his credentials. Thanks Col. for speaking out!
from an old infantry Captain.

The Blackbody Temperature of the Planet Earth


This is a key step in the Climate Debate

Determining the ‘exact’ Blackbody temperature of the planet is the first step in determining what the “greenhouse’ effect is; for without that value all else is either speculation or based on an unreliable value. This leads us to a quandary since the plant is a global spinning around a titled axis and with an elliptical orbit around the sun Figure 1 which is the source of virtually all the energy that heats the planet. Clearly with these facts there cannot be one temperature for the planet and so an average can be very misleading and lead to false conclusions.

Traditional calculations of the planets black body temperature ignore the variables which then lead one to assume a steady state situation verses the real dynamic situation that drives climate. To justify this assumption a general statement that the variances are too small to have any meaningful effect are promoted. I some cases with fewer variables this might be true but in this case I think not.

These are the main Variables:

1. The sun has a cycle of about eleven years and that gives a small variation in the suns output of about 1%
2. The planet has an elliptical Orbit that varies by 3.34% or 4,999,849 miles
3. The axial tilt of the planet is 23.4 degrees which causes winter and summer to alternate between Aphelion and Perihelion about every 10,000 years
4. The planet is a sphere so only one side faces the sun at any given moment
5. The sun’s energy reaches the planet on a line drawn from the center of the sun to the center of the planet which only intersects the equator twice a year
6. The energy from the sun is concentrated around this line
7. The planet is a sphere so the suns radiation drops off in all directions from this line by a Cosine factor to zero at the edge 90 degrees from the center line
8. The spin and tilt of the planet means that the center line moves up 23.4 degrees and down 23.4 degrees during the course of one orbit
9. That movement means the distribution of energy also moves
10. The distribution of land and ocean are not uniform on the planet
11. The albedo of the planet is a variable not a constant
12. Energy from the core adds a small amount of energy
13. Tidal forces from the sun and the moon also add some energy
14. Energy is carried North and South from the hot spot centered on the line by the atmosphere and the ocean
15. The Coriolis Effect along with tidal forces drive thermal transfer north and south at an angle and these are then main contributors to the climate

FIGURE 01
Figure 1, the Earth’s orbit

FIGURE 02
Figure 2, orbital changes in solar flux

There are three sources of energy that determine the climate on the earth: the radiation from the sun which is said to be 1366 Wm2 The actual value based on the orbital range is from 1414.4 Wm2 in January to 1323.0 Wm2 in July Figure 2 and there is also an eleven year sun spot cycle with a range of 1.37 Wm2. The hot core of the planet adds ~0.087 W/m2 and the gravitational effects of the moon and the sun (tides) adds another ~.00738 Wm2. Of these three the sun’s radiation is by far the most important but considering all three the range during an eleven year solar cycle is from a high of ~1415.3 Wm2 to a low of ~1322.4 Wm2 so a more accurate mean would be 1368.34 Wm2.

The energy emitted by the planet must equal the energy absorbed by the planet and we can calculate this using the Stefan-Boltzmann Law. Which is the energy flux emitted by a blackbody is related to the fourth power of the body’s absolute temperature. The tidal and core temperatures are added after the albedo adjustment.

E = σT4
σ = 5.67×10-8 Wm2 K sec
A = 30.6% (the planets albedo, this is not a constant)

σTbb4 x (4πRe2) = S πRe2 x (1-A)
σTbb4 = S/4 * (1-A)
σTbb4 = 1368.24/4 Wm2 * (1-A)
σTbb4 = 342.16 Wm2 * (1-A)
σTbb4 = 254.36 Wm2

Earth’s Blackbody temperature                      Earth’s surface temperature

Tbb = 252.23O K (-20.92O C) low                  Ts = ~287.75O K (14.6 O C) today
Tbb = 254.36O K (-18.79O C) mean
Tbb = 256.54O K (-16.51O C) high

The difference between the Blackbody and the current temperatures is what we call the ‘greenhouse’ effect that averages 33.36O Celsius (C), today, although the range is from 35.52O C to 31.11O C from variations in the 11 year solar cycle. Despite this variation in incoming solar flux the planet’s temperatures is very stable. Other factors are also important in doing climate work such as the solar energy is concentrated between about +/- 30 degrees of the equator maybe a bit more. And the heat from the core and probably the tides is concentrated where the crust is the thinnest under the oceans and this concentration of energy core heat and tides) combined with Coriolis forces is probably what drives the ocean currents. In my opinion these other important factors are not being considered properly in the climate models.

We also know from geological studies Figure 3 that the planets temperature has been relatively stable over the past 600 million years with a mean of about 17O C or 290O Kelvin (K) and with a range of plus or minus 5O K or C based on the information in Figure 3. During the past 250 million years CO2 concentrations have ranged from a low of ~280 ppm (a historic low)in 1800 to the present low of 400 ppm to a high of over 2,000 ppm probably averaging around 1,500 ppm. There was only one other period in the past 600 million years with CO2 this low. Going back further CO2 was estimated to be as high is 7000 ppm, but we will ignore that for now.

This means that whatever the processes are that relate to determining the thermal balance of the planet they must work within this range to be valid. Although Figure 3 shows a range of 10O C it would be prudent to spend resources to determine these values with as great accuracy as possible. We’ll assume a mean of 16O C with a range from 10O to 22O C as being more reasonable. Also we are now in one of only three cold periods which are very rare in the past 600 million years and if we count that partial dip 150 million years ago that means that there is probably a 150 million year cycle there; maybe one of those first determined my Milutin Milankovic.

FIGURE 03
Figure 3, Geological temperatures and Carbon Dioxide

Additional discussion as to the so called “greenhouse” effect must start with the important correction that this process is not a true greenhouse effect, since it is not the same process that occurs in a greenhouse used to grow food. The actual process that occurs is based on the structure of the atoms involved and how they interact with the various frequencies of visible and infrared radiation that are in play on the planet. However at this point in time there is no way to correct for the misuse of the words so we are stuck with it and all the complications that therefore arise in trying to properly discuss the issue with lay people and even some with technical knowledge.

The greenhouse effect occurs within the earth’s atmosphere and the main constitutes of wet air, by volume ppmv (parts per million by volume) are listed in the following table. Water vapor is 0.25% over the full atmosphere but locally it can be 0.001% to 5% depending on local conditions. Water and CO2 are mostly near the surface not in the upper atmosphere so the bulk of the greenhouse effect must be close to the surface.

                                   Gas Volume Percentage
Nitrogen (N2)                                 780,840 ppmv   78.8842%
Oxygen (O2)                                   209,460 ppmv   20.8924%
Argon (Ar)                                          9,340 ppmv    0.9316%
Water vapor (H2O)                             2,500 ppmv     0.2494%
Carbon dioxide (CO2)                            400 ppmv     0.0399%
Neon (Ne)                                          18.18 ppmv     0.001813%
Helium (He)                                         5.24 ppmv     0.000523%
Methane (CH4)                                    1.79 ppmv      0.000179%

There are only two of these gases that are relevant to determining how that 33O C (today) happens. That is not to say the others do not contribute but that at the present concentrations of Water H2O and Carbon Dioxide CO2 they are the main determinants. And since we know the range of temperatures that have existed geologically then we have set the range which these to gases must interact in, meaning that any set of equations or models or theories that predict values outside this range must be suspect based on geological evidence.

Also it must be kept in mind that the solar flux falls on a spot centered on a line drawn from the center of the earth to the center of the sun and because of the 23.5O axial tilt of the planet this “Hot” spot moves up and down as the planet moves though its orbit. Because of the shape of the planet the intensity falls off quickly as we move north and south and east and west according to a cosine factor so the heat energy is mostly over oceans near the equator where the atmosphere is the densest.

The first image below Figure 4 shows a recent distribution of water across the planet and it is clearly concentrated over the oceans close to the equator and that results in the heat imbalance and therefore movement north and south as shown in the second image Figure 5.

FIGURE 04
Figure 4, water vapor concentrated near the equator

FIGURE 05
Figure 5, basic heat flows from the equator north and south

The next two images show how that energy is moved by the water Figure 6 and the atmosphere north and south from the equator Figure 7.

FIGURE 06
Figure 6, Ocean currents

FIGURE 07
Figure 7, Atmospheric heat flows

In summary we now know that the Blackbody temperature of the planet is a variable.

Tbbl   = 252.23O K (-20.92O C) low at Aphelion
Tbbm = 254.36O K (-18.79O C) and the yearly mean
Tbbh  = 256.54O K (-16.51O C) high at Perihelion

Therefore the ‘greenhouse effect must also be a variable.

Ts = ~287.75O K (14.6O C) today

Ghl =   Tbbl + Ts    = 35.52O C
Ghm = Tbbm + Ts = 32.39O C
Ghh =  Tbbh + Ts   = 31.11O C

The range in temperature just from orbital changes is therefore 4.41 O C which is significantly more than the warming that the IPCC claims has happened. These are hard numbers based on the solar flux which is known and the orbital parameters of the Earth that are also known. The large variances come from the Stefan-Boltzmann Law; which is the energy flux emitted by a Blackbody is related to the fourth power of the body’s absolute temperature. The fourth power in the equation magnifies the small variation in solar flux significantly.

NASA/NOAA Corruption Of The Northern Hemisphere Temperature Record


This is FACT I have also studied this issue and NASA-GISS under James E. Hansen setup this system of the distortion of data to promote their cause; this is not science!

Tony Heller's avatarReal Climate Science

I’ve written often how NASA and NOAA have corrupted the US temperature record to rid it of that inconvenient 1930s warmth, but their efforts to wipe out the warm past extend far beyond President Obama’s 57 US states.

They have done even more damage to the Northern Hemisphere temperature record since the 1975 National Academy of Sciences report. The animation below flashes between 1975 National Academy of Sciences temperatures and 2014 GISS temperatures.

From: Tom Wigley <wigley@ucar.edu>
To: Phil Jones <p.jones@uea.ac.uk>
Subject: 1940s
Date: Sun, 27 Sep 2009 23:25:38 -0600
Cc: Ben Santer <santer1@llnl.gov>

It would be good to remove at least part of the 1940s blip, but we are still left with “why the blip”.

di2.nu/foia/1254108338.txt

NASANHChanges1975-2014

1975 NAS Report (Temperature graph on page 148)

data.giss.nasa.gov/gistemp/tabledata_v3/ZonAnn.Ts+dSST.txt

ScreenHunter_807 Jul. 04 08.50

View original post

Kentucky Group Wants To Tax Breathing


I knew this was coming — these people are mentally defective.

Tony Heller's avatarReal Climate Science

A national tax on anything that produces carbon emissions — gasoline, airplanes and coal-burning power plants — is the goal of the new Kentucky chapter of Citizens’ Climate Lobby, an international nonprofit group seeking to curb global warming.

Carbon tax sought to curb global warming

Humans exhale a terrifying 40,000 PPM CO2 – enough to raise current atmospheric CO2 levels by 100X. In order to rescue mankind from global warming, breathing must be stopped through taxation or whatever other means is necessary.

View original post

Going …. Going …. Gone


I agree 100% with this as it goes along with my work on the manipulation that NASA does with the temperature data. But the irony to this is no matter how much they play with the numbers they can’t get the temperatures up to where the climate models say they MUST BE …

Tony Heller's avatarReal Climate Science

Thirty-nine percent of USHCN data is now fabricated, meaning that there is now 39% more monthly temperature data reported than measured, compared to less than 5% in 1990.

ScreenHunter_605 Jun. 22 04.40

The fabricated data is warming 7°F/century faster than the measured data since 1990, when the data started disappearing.

ScreenHunter_607 Jun. 22 05.03

In fact, the measured TOBS adjusted data shows no warming since 1990. All US warming since 1990 is due to data fabrication.

ScreenHunter_609 Jun. 22 05.11

I am considered a heretic for excluding imaginary temperature data from my analysis, and simply averaging the thermometer data. It is now considered unacceptable by the orthodoxy to use actual measured data.

View original post