From the attached report on climate change for **May 2019** **Data** we have the two charts showing how much the global temperature has actually gone up since we started to measure CO_{2} in the atmosphere? To show this graphically **Chart 8** was constructed by plotting CO_{2} as a percent increase from when it was first measured in 1958, the Black plot, the scale is on the left and it shows CO_{2 }going up a bit over 30.0% from 1958 to **May of 2019.** That is a very large change as anyone would have to agree. Now how about temperature, well when we look at the percentage change in temperature from 1958, using Kelvin (which does measure the change in heat), we find that the changes in global temperature (heat) are almost un-measurable. The scale on the right side had to be expanded 10 times (the range is 40 % on the left and 4% on the right) to be able to see the plot in the same chart in any detail. The red plot, starting in 1958, shows that the thermal energy in the earth’s atmosphere increased by** .30%**; while CO_{2} has increased by **30.0%** which is 100 times that of the increase in temperature. So is there really a meaningful link between them that would give as a major problem? The numbers tell us no there isn’t.

The next chart is Chart 8a which is the same as Chart 8 except for the scales which are the same for both CO_{2} and Temperature. As you see the increase in energy, heat, is not visually observably in this chart hence the need for the previous chart 8 to show the minuscule increase in thermal energy shown by NASA in relationship to the change in CO_{2}. Based to these trends, determined by excel not me, in 2028 CO_{2} will be 428 ppm and temperatures will be 15.0^{o} Celsius and in 2038 CO_{2} will be 458 ppm and temperatures will be 15.6^{O} Celsius. This is what the data shows no matter what the reasons are, so I have no idea how the IPCC gets to predict that the world will end in ten or even twenty years.

The full 37 page report explains how these charts were developed and why using NASA and NOAA data are used with out change to prove that The New Green Deal is not required and any attempt to compliment that plan will be a world wide disaster.