Earlier this morning President Trump called-in to Fox and Friends morning broadcast for a lengthy interview.  You can tell there are aspects to the interview adverse to the political interests of Fox News by the fact they did not present the interview for distribution.

However, that said, here’s a copy of the broadcast where President Trump discusses the efforts of the previous administration to target him and eliminate his presidency. If you want to understand President Trump’s perspective on FBI Director Chris Wray skip to @13:00 point of video; and comments on Jeff Sessions @15:20.

Do you ever feel like a martian on another planet?   NBC has an article today discussing forty people arrested in Brooklyn, New York, for violations of the “social distance” rules.

Wait, what?

…Think.

Police… Arrest… Forty People… for Violating… Social Distance Rules.

That alone should be the jaw-dropping headline that shoots flares and warning signals into the stratosphere alerting America that something is seriously screwed up in New York City.  Alas, it is not the simple fact that police are ridiculously arresting people; no, what concerns NBC media is the color of the people being ridiculously arrested:

NBC – Newly released statistics on the New York Police Department’s social-distancing enforcement show that black people account for the majority of arrests in Brooklyn.

Police arrested 40 people in the borough for social-distancing violations from March 17 through May 4, the district attorney’s office said Thursday night.

Of those arrested, 35 people were black, four were Hispanic and one was white.

More than a third of the arrests, 16, were made in Brownsville, a predominantly black neighborhood.

Five people were arrested in East New York’s 75th Precinct and another five in Bedford-Stuyvesant’s 79th Precinct.

No arrests were made in Park Slope, a majority-white neighborhood.  (read more)

Good grief, forget the color… back up a few constitutional amendments and reset the baseline.  WHAT THE HECK are the police doing arresting anyone?

Is New York City so far gone the sheeple just skipped the whole slippery slope thing, and  decided to jump ahead and debate who ends up in the pool?

 

In the summer of 2019 CTH noted: “The problem for Attorney General Bill Barr is not  investigating what we don’t know, but rather navigating through what ‘We The People’ are already aware of.”

Six months later, specifically citing the problem for Bill Barr that Michael Flynn’s prosecution represented, we again cautioned against projecting an altruistic motive toward the AG, because there was more evidence the DOJ priority was institutional preservation than any arbitrary quest for justice.  The problem is BIG:

[…] At the heart of the matter, in the real activity that took place, there was a multi-branch seditious effort to remove President Donald J Trump. From the perspective of those charged with the actual administration of justice – there is no way to put this in front of the American public and have the institutions survive. What we are witnessing is a dance between increasingly narrowing rails and the DOJ trying to find an exit. (more)

With Michael Flynn trapped on the burning roof of a corrupt institution the problem for Barr was how to rescue Flynn without admitting Main Justice and the FBI is on fire.  Fortuitously in January 2020 the FISA Court provided cover, an escape route, for Bill Barr to deal with the problem:

….[LINK] The only way I can see out of this mess; the one crack in the current lock box; is the FISA court order for the DOJ to present the identified downstream consequences from fraud upon the court. The FISC might actually be the ladder truck here. With the DOJ and FBI currently assembling the investigative consequences, ie. the sequestration material, Flynn’s current legal status might be identified as an outcropping of fraud…

That appears to be exactly what happened.

As a result of the January FISC order, in February Bill Barr recruited five U.S. Attorneys to review all of the cases handled by special counsel Robert Mueller {Go Deep}.

The review crosses all judicial venues, and the objective was/is to identify any evidence that was obtained as a result of fraudulently obtained surveillance authorities.

It does not appear coincidental the number of U.S. attorney’s recruited matches the number of targets prosecuted by Robert Mueller’s special counsel team.  It looks like one USAO was assigned to review each prosecution from Mueller’s initial target list.  [Flynn, Manafort, Papadopoulos, Page, and REDACTED]

To address the consequences of fraudulently obtained FISA warrants the DOJ and FBI informed the court they would begin a process to “sequester” all collected evidence from all four FISA warrants. [FISA COURT LINK]

Sequestering the evidence is essentially a search for what investigative material the FISA warrants were used to obtain; ie. the search for the fruit of the poisoned tree; and then a review of all DOJ/FBI cases that may have utilized that investigative material.

In late January the DOJ contacted the FISA court and asked for an extension to the deadline.  The FISA court granted an extension until February 5th [LINK] A week after the deadline expired media started reporting on FIVE newly assigned DOJ lawyers.

One of those DOJ lawyers was USAO Jeff Jensen from Missouri.

Jensen was assigned to review the Flynn case and all of the documents attached to the investigation therein.  It was with this authority and DOJ responsibility that U.S. Attorney Jeff Jensen worked to collect, highlight and release background material.  Ultimately culminating in showing the corrupt FBI activity behind the Flynn prosecution; and the subsequent dropping of charges.

It is important to keep the motives and approach of Main Justice in mind when considering what might come next.

Again, accepting institutional preservation is the ultimate objective, this context is very important because it explains and reconciles why AG Barr keeps praising current FBI Director Wray; and accepting plausible denials from Obama’s primary officials (ex. Yates).

An astute Harry Huffman (commenting) notes this nuanced dance when reviewing the CBS interview of AG Bill Barr:

[Question] “…this all came together really within the last week, based on new evidence?”

Barr: “Right.”

I knew he was going to use Jensen as cover for this action. But his “right” is a direct denial by him that Sidney Powell’s uncovered evidence was definitive, and that Flynn should have been freed last October at the latest (actually, Barr now uses the same words I and others used when it all started: Flynn was incoming National Security Advisor, and had both the right and responsibility to talk with other nations; but we were ignored, even by those on our side who didn’t want to question Barr’s intentions, any more than they did every other traitor who started a “higher loyalty” investigation/persecution of the President).

You waited 7 months, Barr, and you are a liar that it was necessary to have Jensen go over it all again. You are a politician, not a lawman, and a corrupt one at that, with mass treason being ignored.

While the term “liar” is a little harsh; what Harry notes is very correct.  Bill Barr is using Jensen as an excuse to drop the charges against Flynn.  Thereby Barr protects himself from claims of political influence.

The distinction here is important.

Bill Barr could have just dropped the Flynn case and then justified the dropping of the case by outlining what was already well known prior to, and without using, Jensen.  However, if Barr took that approach he would have to explain “the real activity that took place; there was a multi-branch seditious effort to remove President Donald J Trump”; and there’s no-way of doing that while preserving the institutions.  Ergo, use Jeff Jensen and proclaim “…this all came together really within the last week, based on new evidence?”…

Hopefully everyone can see the dynamic at play here.  It is critical to see it; because if you don’t notice the distinction you are setting yourself up for massive disappointment.

I have a habit of saying ‘just call the baby ugly‘, because my nature is to spotlight the brutality of the truth without consideration for the political nuances, airs and graces.  That’s my nature… that outlook skews my perspective because I don’t cotton to spin and all of the various shades of grey when it comes to the administration of justice.

Borrowing from Harry again:

By pretending it was a necessity to wait until Jensen came up with “new evidence”, Barr was/is letting Judge Sullivan off the hook, for not having already freed Flynn, when we all knew long ago that the facts were all on Flynn’s side, yet the judge kept kicking the can down the road and playing along with the corrupt DOJ prosecution (and this, after he had already blown any credibility to judge the case, by blowing up at Flynn in open court and calling him a traitor). Simply, Barr is lying and has been all along: Sidney Powell’s evidence was definitive, and Flynn should have been freed at least 7 months ago.

People need to heed Sundance’s words of warning about Barr’s intentions going forward. Barr hasn’t done anything — including letting go of Flynn — he hasn’t needed to do, to quell the peanut gallery (we who want the truth and nothing but the truth to come out, ASAP).

Again, Barr is playing politics.  Perhaps the specific political game Barr is playing is necessary…. we won’t know until this is all over.   However, the goal needs to be accepted by everyone who is reviewing this saga as it unfolds.  Bill Barr is trying to preserve the institutions of the DOJ and FBI.

That preservation approach implies allowing some very sketchy and corrupt actors to go unpunished,… if they cannot be punished without highlighting the severity of corruption that pre-existed Bill Barr showing up.

…At the heart of the matter, in the real activity that took place, there was a multi-branch seditious effort to remove President Donald J Trump. From the perspective of those charged with the actual administration of justice – there is no way to put this in front of the American public and have the institutions survive. What we are witnessing is a dance between increasingly narrowing rails and the DOJ trying to find an exit….

The wild-card in this dynamic is President Trump; a notorious professional disruptor.  Watch carefully how this plays out and remember President Trump is not wedded to these institutions in the same way Bill Barr is.

Donald Trump was the target; Donald Trump is pissed; President Trump is not a political person by disposition.  President Trump has a unique perspective on this and has no problem throwing a grenade into this situation.

Ultimately, in a very ironic way, the difference between the outlooks of Bill Barr and Donald Trump on these DC institutions is the exact reason why those within the institutions previously targeted candidate Trump.  He has no loyalty to the machine.

Beware the angry righteous man…. with nothing to lose.

President Trump along with a considerable group in congress have the position to keep pushing Bill Barr beyond his comfort zone.  That pressure is not only justified, it is critical.

Earlier today President Donald J. Trump will met with Republican Members of Congress in the State Dining Room to discuss policies to make America’s economy strong again. Video Below – Transcript ADDED:

Attending from the administration: Mark Meadows, Assistant to the President and Chief of Staff; Jared Kushner, Assistant to the President and Senior Advisor; Dan Scavino, Assistant to the President and Deputy Chief of Staff for Communications; Larry Kudlow, Assistant to the President and Director of the National Economic Council; Eric Ueland, Assistant to the President and Director of Legislative Affairs; Christopher Cox, Deputy Assistant to the President and Deputy Director of Legislative Affairs for House; Kevin Hassett, Senior Advisor Trump Administration; Secretary Steven Mnuchin, Department of the Treasury.

.

Participating congressional leadership included: Leader Kevin McCarthy (R-CA), Rep. Kelly Armstrong (R-ND), Rep. Andy Barr (R-KY), Rep. Andy Biggs (R-AZ), Rep. Ted Budd (R-NC), Rep. Dan Crenshaw (R-TX), Rep. Warren Davidson (R-OH), Rep. Greg Murphy (R-NC), Rep. Matt Gaetz (R-FL), Rep. Louie Gohmert (R-TX), Rep. Mark Green (R-TN), Rep. Mike Johnson (R-LA), Rep. Jim Jordan (R-OH), Rep. Debbie Lesko (R-AZ), Rep. Devin Nunes (R-CA), Rep. Scott Perry (R-PA), Rep. Guy Reschenthaler (R-PA), Rep. Elise Stefanik (R-NY), Rep. Lee Zeldin (R-NY)

[Transcript] – THE PRESIDENT: Hi, everybody. Please, sit down. Get things done. Nobody gets it done like we do.

Now, I don’t know — are we letting the media in? Is the media here? I guess we have a limited media because of distancing. And some people think I did that on purpose. But we’ve been getting along with them reasonably well lately.

I just want to thank you all for coming back because you came back. This is a Republican group, largely, if not in all cases. You know, they look pretty Republican. I’m not sure about Devin. Let’s just — you’re a Republican, aren’t you? (Laughter.) No, this is a very, very Republican group. And we appreciate you coming back. Hi, Debbie.

And I just want to say a few words, and maybe we’ll say a couple of words in front of the media. We just left the most beautiful ceremony, celebrating 75 years — the V- — 75 years. And it was magnificent. It was beautiful. It was windy and beautiful. And we have a great country.

And we’re rebuilding our country. We had the greatest economy in the history of the world. No country had anywhere near us. And we had the best we’ve ever had, but we’ve had the best ever in the world. China is a very good competitor, but we were doing much better than China. And that’s before COVID, before this plague came in. We were doing much, much better than anybody. Best we’ve ever done.

And we had to close it down. It was an artificial closing. We had to just close it down. Never happened — a thing like that never happened before. We did the right thing. It’s horrible what’s happened. It should have been stopped. It should have been stopped where it came from, which was China. It could have been stopped easily and quickly. And for some reason, they were unable to do it. I think they tried, but I — it got away from them, I guess. But it’s a shame. And so many hundreds of thousands of people around the world have been killed — 184 countries.

But we’re going to build our country back, and we’re going to build it back fast. This group of people, we all did it before and we’ll do it again. We created something that has never been seen before.

And if you are somebody that likes history — and I think everyone in this room likes history; you wouldn’t be doing what you’re doing — you would see that and you would remember that this was the year that China was going to overtake us in the economy. If you go back two months, you would say that they weren’t anywhere close; that we were going to be there many years of a very — if the right person sits in this seat, it’ll never happen. If the wrong person sits in this seat, it’ll happen in a period of a few years or less. It can happen almost immediately.

So we are in a position where we have to start all over again. And we will start all over again, and we’ll build something that was even better than we had before, recognizing that so many people have died. So many people have died. That’s the one thing we can’t do anything about, unfortunately. What I can say is if we did it the different way — if we went herd, if we just said, “Let’s wing it,” we would have been talking about numbers that would have been unsustainable and unacceptable.

You look on the screens, you look on television today, and you see body bags and you see mass graves. And we may be talking about 95,000 people ultimately. We may be talking about something more than that. But if you take a low number, one and a half million — so you multiply whatever number we’re talking about times 15, it would not — it would not be acceptable. It would not. It’s not acceptable now. One person isn’t acceptable, let alone perhaps 100,000.

So, we’re going to rebuild it. We’re going to rebuild it back as fast as we can. I think we’re going to have an incredible transition. But transition leads to fourth quarter — third quarter, I call it, transition. We’ll start to see it; it’s already happening. People want to come back. I think everybody in this room realizes we have to come back; otherwise, you have a broken country. You’ll never be able to do it again; you’ll never be able to build this miracle. It’s a miracle, what we did — what all of us did and what many people before us did. You’ll never be able to build it again. The people want to come back.

You see what’s going on at statehouses all over the country; they want to come back. I think some people don’t want it really to come back for political reasons, which is sick. But the people — the real people, the people that want this country to be great and great again, we can say they want to get back. And we’re going to have embers. We’re going to have fires. We’re going to have things to put out, and we’ll put them out. We learned a lot — you know, things that we had no idea two months ago. We’ve learned a lot over the last couple of months. And we’re going to do a job like — like nobody has seen before.

And I spoke with Angela Merkel today. I spoke with Prime Minister Abe of Japan. I spoke with many of the leaders over the last four or five days. And so many of them, almost all of them — I would say all of them; not everybody would want to admit it — but they all view us as the world leader, and they’re following us.

You look at what we’ve done with ventilators. We started, and we had no ventilators. Nobody thought in terms of a ventilator. It’s like — and I say it all the time — it’s like building a car. And other countries don’t have ventilators. And we became so successful in ventilators and building this very complex machine, very expensive machine — but very, very complex to have it right, to do it right. Highly computerized. Very technologically significant.

So we built, and we built, and we built. And they took other factories — factories for totally other purposes — and now we have nine factories that are throwing out ventilators at numbers that nobody can believe. It was really — there’s not been anything like that, since the Second World War, where we did the same thing with other types of product.

And we’re giving thousands and thousands away to other countries that are — people dying because they don’t have ventilators, and they’re not equipped to do what we did. So we’re giving thousands and thousands of these ventilators away to many countries that have suffered greatly: Italy, France, Spain, so many countries. And Nigeria called. Tremendous problems in Nigeria. Tremendous problems all over. And so they’re very happy.

In addition to that, we’re building stockpiles for ourselves so if this disaster ever happens again, we have plenty. Some of the governors — we’re working along great with almost all of the governors. But some of them, they needed ventilators. Now it’s testing. And we have testing at a level that nobody has ever done before. Every leader tells us the same thing. In fact, they want to know what are we doing. But you don’t hear that from the media. You never hear that.

But what’s happened with testing is incredible. So as of this morning, we’ve done eight and a half million tests. And yesterday alone, in one day, we did 300,000 tests, and that’s an incredible tribute. Now they have the test where it takes you five minutes. That was a test that didn’t even exist. Everything had to go to a lab. It would be sent to the lab, so it takes a day, and then it takes another day, and by — it takes you three, four, five days if they do a good job.

Now you do a test — boom — and you have it in five minutes. And nobody ever thought a thing like that was even possible. That’s the Abbott Laboratories. But now we have other competitive tests even with that.

So what we’ve done has been incredible. We’re going to continue to do it. We’re going into transition. And I call it “transition to greatness.” It’s going to be transition to greatness because we’re going to do something very fast, and we’re going to have a phenomenal year next year. Third quarter, transition. Fourth quarter is going to be good. There’s tremendous pent-up demand, and next year we’re going to have a phenomenal year.

And with that, I think maybe I’d like to go around the room, and you could introduce yourself and say a few words. And then after that, the media will leave and we’ll have some discussions among ourselves. Okay?

Please, why don’t we start? I think I know this gentleman, huh? And, by the way, Kevin has done some job. He should have had this job a long time before he had it. But that’s okay. We have — we have a great man, and he’s going to be hopefully a great Speaker of the House. We got to get him there. If we get them there — (applause) — and when I say “hopefully,” hopefully we’re going to win, because I have no doubt he’ll be a great Speaker the House. We don’t have to hope about anything. He’s done a fantastic job.

Kevin?

LEADER MCCARTHY: Well, Mr. President, I do want to say one thing. As you and the First Lady were out there honoring what transpired 75 years ago — that we had to end the tyranny of what Hitler was doing throughout Europe — we now battle something that is like a war. That — this is a virus. It came from a distant land that we did not invite.

But just as we had to transform our country then and unite, that leadership you’re providing is doing just that, as you talk about ventilators, gearing up testing more than 1.7 million in one week. The ingenuity of this country will solve this problem. And we will not just solve and get a vaccine for us, but for the rest of the world.

I do want to thank you. Coming from California, I know I have a blue state, I know I have a governor, but the way you’ve worked together, watching you send those Navy ships to New York and to California, build those hospitals in a time of need, I do want to thank you on behalf of everyone in California for the work you’ve done.

THE PRESIDENT: Thank you very much, Kevin. Great state. Thank you very much.

Elise?

REPRESENTATIVE STEFANIK: Thank you, Mr. President, for all of the support for New York State. This has been a true partnership, and the administration has stepped up, whether it’s ventilators or building the Javits Center, which was tremendously important.

THE PRESIDENT: Right.

REPRESENTATIVE STEFANIK: My district in Upstate New York, people are eager to get back to work safely. Our tourist businesses, our hotels have been devastated. So as we talk about this transition, making sure that we allow our small businesses to get back to work safely is so incredibly important.

Also, our farmers. Thank you to Secretary Perdue for stepping up. We have dairy farmers in our district who are going through a crisis, but we know that you support the farmers, and we’re appreciative of all of your work for New York. And I know you’ve worked effectively with Democrats and Republicans in New York State. So, thank you.

THE PRESIDENT: Thank you very much. And so, for the farmers, you know, we gave $12 billion two years ago, from China, through tariffs because they were targeting our farmers. And then we gave $16 billion, and this year we’re giving $19 billion to the farmers. And that’s more money than they’ve ever even thought about. And it’s keeping them in a position where — really, a position of strength, but they deserve it. What they’ve gone through for 18, 19 years, this isn’t a new phenomenon. This is, for years, they’ve been ripped off. So we’re taking care of our farmers.

Thank you very much, Elise.

Dan? Please.

REPRESENTATIVE CRENSHAW: Thank you, Mr. President. Thank you for having us here. And thank you for working every single day. You know, Speaker Pelosi would have the — America believe that we can only show up to Congress to vote every — once every three weeks. Of course, that’s not true. We could be working every single day, just like this administration is. And I appreciate what you’ve done. I appreciate you working with us for — to protect our energy industry.

You know, America is in real dire straits with oil prices the way they are. We’re deeply worried about that in Texas, and your administration has been excellent to work with on that front. We understand how important energy independence is to our nation.

Now, Texas is reopening, and I think it can be a model for the rest of the country as we step out of a retreat and move to actually confront this virus head on and get people back to work.

THE PRESIDENT: Well, it’s interesting, Dan, because oil prices are now going up, and gasoline prices are going down. That’s like the best combination I’ve ever heard. (Laughter.) So our millions of people in the energy business, I think, is going to be — you know, that’s moving up. But you look at those gasoline prices, and they’re really coming down. So I don’t think I’ve ever seen a combination like that. So it’s going to be very good. A lot of good things happening in energy.

Jared, you should say something because you headed up our whole ventilator problem that this country had. We — the cupboard was bare when we took it over. People don’t realize it. They don’t want to say it. But the cupboard was bare. We had nothing. And I could say that for the military, too. Dan would know that almost better than anybody. And the folks that are so much — and so well-versed on military.

But our military cupboard was bare also. We had obsolete equipment. We had old equipment. And now we have — we’ve never been in a position like this. We have the best equipment in the world, all made in the United States.

But, Jared, why don’t you give them a little — a little talk on what we did with the ventilators and how that just became such an incredible story? And we’re doing the same thing with testing, and we’re pretty close to a point where we’re equally as good.

Go ahead.

MR. KUSHNER: Yes, sir. On ventilators now, the good news is that, every day, the balance that we have in the stockpile that the country has continues to grow. Initially, it was very scary in that we had a lot of states requesting numbers that could not be supplied. And a lot of you were very helpful at getting the local hospitals in your districts to give the actual data to the federal government, because the President wanted to make sure that anybody in this country who needed a ventilator would get a ventilator.

He saw what was happening in Italy, where people were dying in hospitals and not able to get the care they needed. And the President said, “I don’t want that to happen in America. Deploy every resource that we have, get all the intel we have, and let’s do our best to try to make it work.” And we were able to make it work thanks to your leadership.

And then what we were also able to do is use the Defense Production Act at the President’s urging. And we were able to contract with 11 different ventilator companies. Last year, America made about 30,000 ventilators. This year, we’ll make about 150,000 in a four-month period. And so we’re in a place right now where we’re doing well. A lot of our allies — the countries that are friendly with America — are starting to get ventilators from us. And we have more than enough to take care of all the American citizens. So it’s been a great success story.

And on testing, the numbers continue to grow. We have all the supplies that we need to do it. We’ve now educated all of the governors. We have over 5,000 testing machines in the city. We’ve had the commercial sector, through the public-private partnerships that the President had us lead, those have now identified over 5,000 machines. We’ve done DPA on swabs. So we’re making a ton of swabs. We have reagents. We have transport media. And we’ve been working with all the governors to help them with the National Guard on how to better collect samples.

And so we’re seeing those numbers starting to really rise. And when you look at the number that America has done relative to any other country, we’re two to three times the next — the next — the next number.

So, on an absolute basis, the job that you’ve led on that has been absolutely tremendous. And that’s giving the tools to America to start opening up these counties and allowing Americans to get back to work.

THE PRESIDENT: Good. Thank you, Jared. You’ve done a great job. Someday, people are going to appreciate it. (Laughter.) They say, “Oh, he’s a relation.” Well, he’s a relation. If he wasn’t a good relation, I’d get him out of here so fast. (Laughter.) Sometimes we have a problem, Louie. I say, “Get Jared on it.” So, great job, Jared.

MR. KUSHNER: Thank you, sir.

THE PRESIDENT: Smart guy.

MR. KUSHNER: Thank you.

THE PRESIDENT: So, here’s another smart guy. So Devin, I think — I thought about Devin more over the last couple of days than anybody else, because this guy would come in, and he’d tell people what was going on, and nobody believed it because it was not believable. It just wasn’t true that they would be doing a takeover of a presidency illegally and all of the illegality that was going on. And he was the first one.

Our superstar, Jim, and all of us will admit this guy was just — he wouldn’t stop. Devin Nunes. He wouldn’t stop. He saw it before anybody. And you deserve a medal. You deserve the equivalent of Pulitzer Prizes. They ought to take the Pulitzer Prize away from all of these phony journalists that got a Pulitzer Prize. And they — they were wrong. They were wrong on everything, and now they’ve been proven wrong.

I saw where Clapper — not a smart guy. How do you have not a smart person heading up intelligence? How does that work? Right? You have a man who is not smart and he heads up intelligence. And that’s possibly what happened. They ran away with it. But — but he knew what was going on. And I’d watch him on television; he’d say the worst things. And now I know why Shifty Schiff — dishonest, corrupt politician — why this guy didn’t want these papers exposed, because all these people said under oath, where they go to jail if they lie, they were totally, “No, I didn’t see any collusion with Russia. I saw nothing. No, I saw…” I said, “But he was on television before and after saying there was massive collusion,” like Putin was my best friend.

We had no calls to Russia. We had no calls from Russia, for years. And all of a sudden, we have this great friendship. And, by the way, getting along with Russia is a great thing, getting along with Putin and Russia is a great thing. And stuff like this makes it impossible. And that leads to very bad things. Very bad things.

But I have to say that Devin was incredible. He understood it. He understood that it was a hoax before anybody else knew what was happening. And then, I have to say, the people in this room took over and did a hell of a job with you, right? They had guts. They had guts like nobody has ever seen before.

I want to thank you on behalf of our country. And I’d like to have you say a few words.

REPRESENTATIVE NUNES: Well, thank you, Mr. President. And it’s unfortunate what you had live through for the last four years —

THE PRESIDENT: Yeah.

REPRESENTATIVE NUNES: — from your campaign to your presidency. And I appreciate your kind words and for all the folks in here who have worked so hard getting to the bottom of the Russia hoax situation.

Let me just talk a little bit about the situation our country is in now. I know you’re well aware we’ve had six, seven weeks here of keeping people inside their homes. We’ve learned a lot about this virus. There’s still a lot more we need to learn. We need to learn what our friends over in Asia were doing the time that this virus was taking off and the issues with the World Health Organization.

And I believe with your new pick, with John Ratcliffe, a member of the House Intelligence Committee, member from Texas, he’s going to do a great job of getting to the bottom of this, and I think leading the intelligence agencies through some what would have been some pretty dark times over the last few years.

THE PRESIDENT: And I think we should say Rick Grenell has done a great job too. (Applause.) In fact, John called up — John Ratcliffe called up two days ago. He said, “You know, I’m really looking forward to this, but I don’t know if I can top the guy we have in there right now.” And he was — he’s going to do a phenomenal job. But Rick Grenell has —

REPRESENTATIVE NUNES: Yeah, he’s done a (inaudible).

THE PRESIDENT: — has been incredible. Before that, we had an empty seat. We had an empty seat. But Rick Grenell, what he’s done — even Louie would admit that. And I saw Rick yesterday walking in with thousands of pages of paper into the Justice Department. We didn’t see that before did we, Louie? Huh? Rick Grenell did a great job. And John is going to be phenomenal.

Please.

REPRESENTATIVE NUNES: Well, Mr. President, what we expect and the American people expect is transparency from our law enforcement agencies. And I think we’re well on our way to getting that.

I want to also thank you for bringing us back here to show the American people that we can be here and do our work. The Democrats are cowering at home right now. And it makes no sense, because we’ve learned so much. I can understand, for the first few weeks. But we’re learning. We have ventilators, we have — we’re learning new ways how to treat this virus.

And if we’re expecting — as you know, you’ve been in my district. It’s the San Joaquin Valley of California, heavy agricultural area. My folks have been going to work. My folks have been going to work, and — because they have to feed this country, a lot of the folks around here. And, you know, we expect the guys that are cutting meat or working in a grocery store, working in these packing plants, if we expect them to go to work, we ought to go to work as members of Congress.

And I’ll just leave it at that.

THE PRESIDENT: I will say I got you all of your permits necessary from the federal government for water. You know, we throw millions of gallons a day of water into the Pacific Ocean that comes from up north. And when I saw Devin, I say, “How come those fields are all barren? They’re beautiful land.” All barren, brown. And then they’ll have a little patch like this, a little patch in a corner, or a little patch on one side, and it’s beautiful green. You could see it was so — and I said, “How come so much of it — 90 percent, 95 percent — it looks like a desert? And you have this…” And he said, “We don’t have water.” I said, “You mean you have a drought.” This was a long time ago we met, right? Right at the beginning, before I got elected. And I said, “You mean you have a drought. And you said “No, we don’t have a drought. We send millions of gallons of water out to the ocean to protect a very — well, I’ve never say anything is that important; I think everything is i
mportant to protect — go ahead. What’s the name?

REPRESENTATIVE NUNES: The smelt. Delta smelt. Yeah.

THE PRESIDENT: So you have a delta smelt that’s not doing well. It’s getting no water, and it will do a lot better if it had water. But they send millions and millions of it — is that seriously — is that the only reason? That’s the reason they send it out there?

REPRESENTATIVE NUNES: Yeah, that and —

THE PRESIDENT: For the delta smelt?

REPRESENTATIVE NUNES: — that and salmon. Yes.

THE PRESIDENT: It’s incredible.

REPRESENTATIVE NUNES: The farmers are very thankful for — for recognizing the important work that you’ve done not only in San Joaquin Valley, but all over the country. And I’ll just say that’s why they’re out working and I think we should be working. And I’m glad you brought us here.

THE PRESIDENT: Well, you know, with the water though, I said, “So, what has to happen?” Well, you need approvals from Congress, from this, from that. You need all sorts of approvals, but you need it from Commerce, more importantly, than anything. I got every approval for you. And you got a lot of the state approvals done through Kevin and yourself and others.

All you need now is a signature of the governor. And those millions of gallons of wasted water going into the Pacific, that’s like a drop in the bucket. It doesn’t mean anything to the Pacific. All of that water would come right down, all the way into Los Angeles.

And, you know, in Los Angeles, I had a house in Los Angeles; you couldn’t — I sold it. You know why I sold it? Because Secret Service says, “You can’t come here anymore.” I said, “I might as well sell it.” But I had a house, and you couldn’t — you couldn’t have water. You couldn’t water your grass. They said, “Oh, you’re not allowed to water your grass.” And then you look at this massive turn. They had a turn. It took — it takes a day to turn, like a big faucet. And they turn it and it veers all the water out into the Pacific. It’s crazy.

So we’re all set, except you need Gavin’s signature. If you get Gavin’s signature, you’re going to have water from Los Angeles all the way up. And it’s the most incredible thing I’ve ever seen. I thought — I thought it was a drought and I said, “You (inaudible) it.” He said, “No, we have tremendous amounts of water, but we send it out to the Pacific Ocean.” And it was over the smelt.

So if you can get his signature —

REPRESENTATIVE NUNES: Well, I know — I know you — you know, during this time of crisis, we need to work with the governor, and I thank you for working with our governor, who’s obviously not a supporter of yours.

But there is a serious issue there that the governor needs to recognize that we have a water crisis in our — in our state that you’ve recognized. And he needs to drop the lawsuits that he’s brought and work with us.

THE PRESIDENT: Well we’ve gotten along very well. Gavin Newsom. We’ve gotten very well with regard to COVID-19, as we call it. In that respect, he’s been fantastic, and we’ve been fantastic. And he said very generous things. But on other things, we disagree — like the water, like cars — because you can have a car for much less money that’s equally good environmentally, but much safer, better — better car.

California forces you to build a bad car that doesn’t work well, and there are a lot of reasons for not doing it that way. So we’ll end up — so on that, we don’t agree. But we agree on — we agree on the coronavirus. And, on that, we’ve gotten along very well.

And we’ve done a great job for California and for everybody. And — and he was very honest about that assessment. It’d be great if you could get the water, but you’re all set. Okay? You’re all set. Just — I say that to Kevin too. Get his signature and you’re going to have so many — you’re going to — all those thousands of acres are going to be opened up, and they’ll have plenty of water for Los Angeles too.

So they won’t have to ration. They’re going to water — they’re going to ration the water in California. It’s the most incredible thing I’ve ever seen. And yet they’re sending millions of gallons out.

So thank you very much. But thank you for — originally, thank you very much for the job you’ve done. Appreciate it.

REPRESENTATIVE NUNES: Thank you, sir.

THE PRESIDENT: Please.

REPRESENTATIVE BUDD: Ted Budd, North Carolina.

THE PRESIDENT: Yes.

REPRESENTATIVE BUDD: And I want to thank you for having me here. I also want to thank my colleagues from the House. There is no vote today. There’s nothing we’re voting on. The Speaker — Speaker Pelosi has not brought us in to — to do anything meaningful. But we’re here to lead by example and to say that we’re ready to work. So we need something meaningful to help those back home.

In North Carolina, we’re very grateful for all the work that you’ve done here. And again, Secretary Mnuchin, I want to thank you as well for all that you’ve done. The PPP and the work that you’ve done for Main Street has helped keep these businesses intact so that we can have — intact, so that we can have this quick recovery. We’re ready for Q3. We’re ready to get going. And in North Carolina, we’re ready to rebuild.

THE PRESIDENT: Great job. Thank you

REPRESENTATIVE BUDD: Thank you.

REPRESENTATIVE RESCHENTHALER: Thank you, Mr. President. Guy Reschenthaler from Pennsylvania. I just want to thank you and the administration for holding China accountable. I think, for way too long, no one has held China accountable. And the fact that we’re looking into the World Health Organization and how they really worked hand in glove with the Chinese Communist Party to cover this virus up in the early days is absolutely shameful. So thank you for bringing attention to that.

In Pennsylvania, we’re having a really hard time because the governor has had such draconian shutdown measures. We’re now number one in unemployment claims, but we’re only number five, in terms of population.

Instead of protecting the most vulnerable in nursing homes, where you had 65 percent of the deaths, if not more, in Pennsylvania, he just had a draconian measure, one-size-fits-all approach that lacked any kind of nuance. And it’s destroying our economy, while at the same time leaving the most vulnerable exposed to this virus.

So thanks for calling out the governors that are going too far with this and calling for America and Congress to go back to work.

THE PRESIDENT: So what the Democrats are doing in Pennsylvania is a disgrace. Okay? It’s a disgrace.

Thank you very much.

REPRESENTATIVE RESCHENTHALER: Thank you.

REPRESENTATIVE GREEN: Mr. President, Mark Green from Tennessee. Great to see you again.

THE PRESIDENT: Thanks, Mark.

REPRESENTATIVE GREEN: This — thanks for your leadership. This COVID-19 thing has been unprecedented.

You know, it’s a challenge to both the world and the United States, our country — a China made wor- — or a challenge made worse by China and the delays and information to us, the deception.

I mean, China lied and — and people died. And as an infantry officer, an ER physician, former business CEO, I know that when a leader is caught in an ambush, that leader has to make split-second decisions with the information that they have.

Mr. President, I’m proud of the decisions that you have made — decisions like banning travel from China, which these guys all laughed at and criticized. But it saved American lives. Sir, you saved American lives with those decisions. And we in Tennessee, we thank you for that.

We’re opened up for business. We’re going to the restaurants, and business is running again. We’re ready to lead, and we appreciate your phased plan. We’re implementing it in Tennessee. Just thank you for your leadership, sir.

THE PRESIDENT: I really appreciate it. And your governor is doing a great job. And you’re right, though. We banned people from China coming in, and they said, “Oh, but you did allow people.” Yeah, they were American citizens, and they were allowed in under very, very strict rules and regulations and quarantines and everything else. But we banned people.

And a number of our leading doctors said that would’ve — that saved hundreds of thousands of lives. And that was in January. And I remember being in a room with, I think, 21 people, and I was the only one that wanted to do that. Nobody else wanted to do it. They thought it was — they thought it was crazy. It had never been done before. Nothing like that had ever been done before.

And now you watch them, the Democrats and the media, say, “Oh, I should have done it sooner.” There was — nobody even thought about it. And a month later, you’d see Nancy Pelosi and other people talking about, “This disease is just nothing. It’s going to spread over.”

And she wanted to go. And she was actually in — late in February, she was in Chinatown in San Francisco celebrating, because “this disease is going to be nothing.” So I don’t — I understand that. I mean, she felt that and I can understand it. But for them to say much early — I actually banned Chinese from coming in — China from coming into our country. It’s a — it’s a — just such a political disgrace that they’re able to get away. It’s just like Shifty Schiff making the statement today to try and save face, when we have him cold on the papers, on the documents, and in about 19 different ways.

It’s — it’s so bad and so sad for our country.

Thank you very much.

REPRESENTATIVE GREEN: Mr. President, you — you’ve ban — you put that ban in place before they even named the virus.

THE PRESIDENT: Yeah.

REPRESENTATIVE GREEN: You — you saved Americans’ lives. Thank you.

THE PRESIDENT: Thank you very much. I appreciate it.

REPRESENTATIVE ARMSTRONG: Thank you, Mr. President. Kelly Armstrong from North Dakota. We’re an ag and energy state, so we’ve been uniquely hit on a lot of this stuff, but I’d like to say thank you for standing — standing so tough with Saudi Arabia. That was a huge deal for our oil producers.

Obviously, you’ve been great for agriculture, but thank you especially for your statement yesterday in support of cattle ranchers. Sometimes they get lost in the mix. And they’ve been getting hit pretty hard right now, so we really appreciate that. And then just — you get this economy up and going and we’ll do what we do best, and that’s feed and fuel the world.

THE PRESIDENT: And that demand is coming back. And you’re up to $25, $26 a barrel. And a little bit more, and you’re going to save your energy industry, really, because we’re number one. And Russia and Saudi Arabia, I got them together and they came to a good conclusion for us and for them and for everybody. And once that demand goes up, it’s going to be great for the energy industry. So thank you very much.

REPRESENTATIVE ARMSTRONG: Thank you, sir.

THE PRESIDENT: Louie?

REPRESENTATIVE GOHMERT: Thank you, Mr. President. And echoing the thanks. If you had lost that election in 2016, we would never have been energy independent. And it’s been great for Texas. It’s been great for America.

And I do want to advise our media friends, before they write stories about how we didn’t wear masks and we didn’t possibly socially distance adequately, that you saw to it that we had tests and that nobody in here has the coronavirus, unless it’s somebody in the media.

So the only reason we would wear masks is if we were trying to protect ourselves from you, in the media. And we’re not scared of you. So that’s why we can be here like this.

So thank you for the amazing job you’ve done. And it is amazing to see the hypocrisy. You know, you do a travel ban — like Mark said, it saved lives — and they called you racist. And then, when they realized you did the right thing, they said you should have done it earlier. And — and perhaps they could have noticed the need if they had not been pursuing, you know, the hoax that was the impeachment.

And I know the Speaker has appointed this new committee to investigate your handling of the coronavirus. And I’ve suggested they ought to name that committee “The Committee of Oligarchs to Un-Elect the President,” or “COUP” for short. But that’s exactly what it is.

And the money — Steve and Larry, thank you for your work. There are a lot of people that are working for companies today that would not be in my district in East Texas. And they wouldn’t be. I’ve heard this week from some that say they’re getting threats that if they had any capital, they shouldn’t have taken the loan and they may be pursued for criminal when they could not have hired those people back if they had not taken the loan. So —

THE PRESIDENT: Right.

REPRESENTATIVE GOHMERT: — I hope that that’ll be backed off a little bit because it has put people to work that couldn’t otherwise. But I’m optimistic, and I wouldn’t be if you weren’t President. So, thank you for the work you’re doing.

THE PRESIDENT: Well, thank you, Louie. And you’ve been a great help. And if we didn’t win the election, we wouldn’t have found out all of the corrupt practices that have taken place —

REPRESENTATIVE GOHMERT: Never have known.

THE PRESIDENT: — at the top of the FBI, with dirty cops and all of the things that we found out about other people in other agencies that are equally as important. All of this we — we want to drain the swamp and that’s what we’re doing. But nobody ever told me the swamp was going to be this — this vicious or this deep. And we’re doing it, and you know.

REPRESENTATIVE GOHMERT: Could I make a suggestion on the Justice area? And I know that with the Democrats in charge, some of the most important reforms may not happen. But the FBI is the only law enforcement entity I’m aware of that has not even come into the 20th century. Not even asking them to come into the 21st. Everybody else does video tapes and audio tapes. And the FBI interviews witnesses and goes back and records their own notes of what they want to say a witness said, and then it’s easily changed.

And we need to bring them into the 20- — 20th century where they start at least doing some audio recordings so they can’t change them. So that’s one of the lessons we’ve seen from what’s happened in their effort to create a coup.

THE PRESIDENT: And not only do they not record, but they write their notes. And then when the notes are bad for them, they go and change them months later. This is a corrupt deal that’s been going on. And we caught them cold. And now we have to see what happens. But Bill Barr has done a great job. He’s a strong guy and he’s done a great job. And not easy — he’s fighting a lot of fights. But he really has been great, and we appreciate it.

But you’re right about that. I said I’d like to hear a tape of what the interview was. And they said, “Well, no, it was just…” And they write it out like scribble.

REPRESENTATIVE GOHMERT: Yeah.

THE PRESIDENT: It’s crazy. And then they change it. And they change signatures. They change everything.

REPRESENTATIVE GOHMERT: It’s so we don’t have the old one.

THE PRESIDENT: It’s one of the most incredible things, isn’t it, huh?

REPRESENTATIVE GOHMERT: Yeah.

THE PRESIDENT: Thank you very much. Appreciate it.

REPRESENTATIVE GOHMERT: Thank you.

PARTICIPANTl: The most powerful guy in Washington.

THE PRESIDENT: Dan — Dan — I say Dan, most powerful man. Dan Scavino.

MR. SCAVINO: I just want to thank everybody in this room for the past three and a half years for supporting our President and the administration in everything you’ve done. This man goes 18, 20 hours a day. As many of you know, he’s the most transparent President in history. He’s the most accessible, too. There’s nobody in this room that can’t call or get through to them — mornings, evenings, midday.

But we love you all. And thank you so much, on behalf of everybody here in the White House, for everything that you’ve done supporting our President. It means the world.

Thank you.

THE PRESIDENT: And what a job he’s done, too. Right, Mark? He’s been amazing, and he does it himself. I remember when I was running — Crooked Hillary had 28 people. I had Dan, and Dan blew them away. It wasn’t even a contest. And we have now, I guess, six different sites, platforms. And we have numbers that these people don’t have. They don’t even come close to it.

So when they write false stories, we can go around them. And it’s very important to be — who needs — who needs it? I wish we didn’t need it, but unfortunately we have to do that, we have to have that, because we don’t get an honest press.

Please. I’ll tell you, Gaetz, you’ve been something. He’s — he’s out there, Devin. Right? He’s out there fighting.

Go ahead, Matt.

REPRESENTATIVE GAETZ: Thank you, Mr. President. Your team is here. We’re ready to work. And we are inspired by our President. I have observed your willingness to work with anyone. I saw the Democrat Governor of New Jersey categorize the administration’s response as “extremely responsive.”

I’ve noted on our calls that our Democrat colleagues in the House, like Tom Suozzi and Jimmy Panetta, have made contributions reflected in the great work that Jared has done on testing, and that Secretary Mnuchin has done, and that the Chief has done as well.

But I have to say, Mr. President, I’m deeply concerned about what we’re seeing from the Democratic leadership, because, in the last several days, they have been caught in a terrible lie. Not only was there no collusion, we not — now know that the leaders of the Democratic Party knew that there was no collusion at the beginning and willingly lied to the American people anyway.

Now we see that they’re reverting to their old playbook. As we want to work together to provide provision to our people and take good ideas no matter where they come from, Nancy Pelosi and Chuck Schumer just want to set up new committees to investigate, rather than working together.

I know that, even before being President, you talked about the importance of the President being a great cheerleader for our country and for our economy. I know it, and I know, in the jobs report today, we can see that even the people who have been furloughed or who are on unemployment now, they’re optimistic that this is the team that will bring America back.

What advice would you give us to try to have our Democratic leadership behave more like the governors you’ve worked with and some of the rank-and-file colleagues who’ve made helpful suggestions, rather than just reverting to their hatred and their lies to cover their tracks for their last set of lies?

THE PRESIDENT: I think they’ve been doing it so long and gotten away with it for so long, long prior to us. And they had that eight years — the Obama eight years — that have been absolutely terrible, if you look at the Justice Department and what’s taken place; you look at the FBI and what’s taken place. And, frankly, prior to that, a lot of bad things went on.

All we can do is keep winning. And if we keep winning, eventually they’re going to come around one way or the other. It may not be in that form. It may not be them. Because I’m not sure that you can do that with them. Tremendous dishonesty from Schiff and from others, and they know what’s been going on. They know. These are not stupid people. They know it was a hoax. They know better than anybody in this room it was a hoax; they set it up. They’re not aggrieved.

I watched Schiff — Shifty Schiff, nine inches around the neck. And I watched this guy — uses the world’s smallest collar, right? But I watched him to- — I guess, this morning, talking about it. He acts so aggrieved, so aggrieved. He knows it was a — he got caught. And not only caught; if he weren’t in the halls of Congress, he’d be in jail because he made up phony stories and phony speeches and phony every- — everything was phony. He’s a sick man. He’s really a sick man, and he’s a corrupt politician. So I wouldn’t count on somebody like him.

But I think, overall, we have some really good support. I’ve had great support from Democrat governors. I would say almost all. Almost all. And in some cases — oh, look, Andrew Cuomo, the other day, said that I, we, have done a phenomenal job. That’s a nice statement. “Phenomenal” — that’s a good word. It’s true. But we’ve had great support.

And Gavin Newsom, the same thing. He said something — the equivalent of that. So we can work with them, but I think this group is perhaps beyond repair. They’re sick. There’s something wrong with them.

Mark, please.

REPRESENTATIVE MEADOWS: Well, Mr. President, I know I speak for you, but I just want to thank all of you for setting the example and coming back to Washington, D.C. It’s time that we send a message to the American people that we’re open for business, we’re ready to get back, and we’re ready to support a President who has been willing to take the bold moves, each and every day, to make sure that America is first.

So thank you for allowing me to serve and thank all of you.

THE PRESIDENT: Well, I have to — before I introduce you, I might have to say — so, we had all of the great NCAA teams here just prior to COVID; otherwise, they wouldn’t have been able to come. But we had all of the teams. And one of the teams was the top wrestling — wrestlers in the country. All the champions — NCAA wrestlers.

And I saw them, and I immediately knew it was wrestling. I could see there was a little action going over those ears, and the muscles were coming out of the shirt, and I could see by the jawline. And I walked up with Jim Jordan, and they didn’t give a damn about the President. They said, “That’s Jim Jordan.” (Laughter.) You don’t know what a great wrestler — NCAA champion and a great wrestler. And they saw him. Those wrestlers saw this guy, and they said, “Sorry, President, I got to say hello to him first.” Right?

So Jim Jordan — and he is — he’s a champ. He’s a winner. He knows how to win.

REPRESENTATIVE JORDAN: Thank you, Mr. President. The exact same time that we learned what we did about General Flynn, the exact same time we learned that there was absolutely no basis for the entire Mueller Russia investigation that the FBI did — that very time, Nancy Pelosi sets up a select committee to come after you again.

And so we just need to understand, guys, that they’re never going to stop. But in spite of that relentless attack we have seen from them, Mr. President, we appreciate your leadership, we appreciate your entire team’s leadership, getting things done for the American people.

And I think, as Dan said, I appreciate your work ethic. I know how hard you work for the American people. I mean, I know — I know how Meadows works. You used to return my calls all the time. Now you — (laughter) — I know he’s working 15 hours, 18 hours a day.

THE PRESIDENT: That’s true.

REPRESENTATIVE JORDAN: And you’re working — you’re working even more. So thank you for doing all — the people in the Fourth District of Ohio appreciate it, the people around the country appreciate it. And we just need to keep it up, and we’ll have the great American comeback happening real soon.

THE PRESIDENT: Great. But I — and you’re right, Jim, I looked at this — I didn’t even know anything about it; I see she’s setting up an oversight committee. And I’m getting — I’m getting called by other countries, saying what a great job we’re doing. “Could we have some help, sir, with testing? Your tests are better than our tests. They’re the best tests in the world.” We have the best tests in the world. We have the most tests in the world. “Could we get ventilators? Is there any way? Our people are dying. Could we get ventilators?” Everything.

And they set up an oversight committee about the job we’re doing, when she, a month later, was in Chinatown dancing, as I said. It’s a disgrace.

But what’s even more of a disgrace is take a look at the people on the committee. They’re the greatest Trump haters in history. Maxine Waters. Every one of them is — is people that were screaming “impeach” before I even announced running.

Now, I kid when I say that, because they’ll say that’s not true. But pretty close. Pretty close. (Laughter.) You know, if I say that, they’ll say, “That’s not true.” They don’t understand sarcasm in the press.

But I will say, if you look at some of the people in that committee, every one is a total kill. And it’s a disgrace. It’s a disgrace that they could do a thing like that. And here we go again. Here we go again.

But we beat them, and we’ve been beating them for a long time, and they — they cannot accept it. They cannot accept it. That’s why it’s interesting — I could work with the governors, and we’re doing it really well, and they’re saying great things about me and the job we’re all doing. But you can’t work with these people. I think they’re stone-cold crazy.

Anyway, thank you, Jim, very much.

REPRESENTATIVE JORDAN: Thank you, Mr. President.

THE PRESIDENT: Kevin, how about a little recap as to how you think we’re going to do in that next year coming up?

MR. HASSETT: Sure. Thank you very much, sir, and thank you. I’m humbled that you invited me back to pitch in in this crisis, and I’m honored to be here again with you.

You know, I think it’s fitting that the members of Congress — thank you for coming back — that you would be meeting and working to make the economy better precisely today, which was about the worst jobs report ever. And that was something that we’ve been telling people was going to happen —

THE PRESIDENT: Right.

MR. HASSETT: — because you took the step to save lives, to slow the economy down.

But there was a silver lining in the report today, ladies and gentlemen, that was really interesting to us — and the President and I talked about last night in the Oval — that almost everybody who accounted for the increase in unemployment in the report today said they expect to go back to work within six months.

And now, if that happens, then what will have happened is something historic: that we would have experienced the biggest shock in the history of the world, just about, short of, perhaps, World War — and recovered quickly.

And I think that if we did that, sir, it’s going to be because the economy was so strong in January that people have been able to withstand this, and because the policies that you all work together to adopt built the bridge to the other shore.

Thank you, sir.

THE PRESIDENT: And, at the same time, we would have saved millions of lives, because ultimately that’s what we did this for. But I heard that statement from you and some others yesterday that almost everybody expects to be back to work shortly. That’s very unusual. Usually, when you have something like this, they never expect to get a job again. So that’s a great thing.

Thank you. Good point. Thank you very much, Kevin.

REPRESENTATIVE ZELDIN: Mr. President —

THE PRESIDENT: Thank you, Lee.

REPRESENTATIVE ZELDIN: — House Republicans are here in Washington, D.C., to work. We want to deliver for the American people, and we’re honored to be here today. And hopefully, the Speaker calls us back into session at the beginning of next week. We’ll see.

We should have been here this week. The Senate was here in Washington, D.C., but —

THE PRESIDENT: What is she doing? And where is she? What’s going on?

REPRESENTATIVE ZELDIN: You know, I actually think that she’s just trying to consolidate more power in her own gavel. She likes the feeling of that gavel in her hand. She knows that the grip is being loosened. And come January of 2021, she’s going to have to hand it over to Kevin McCarthy. And in the meantime, she is trying to consolidate as much power as she can.

And when she brings her House Democrats to Washington, and there’s a process where we’re able to participate in crafting legislation, she won’t be able to dictate as much of her obstructionist, radical agenda that appeases an enraged liberal base that put that gavel in her hands in the first place.

And many of us here in this room were with you on the beaches of Normandy, and we’re honored to be back here today to be with you on VE Day. And not just as a member of Congress, but also as an Army veteran, I want to thank you for all of your support for our military. And in so many ways, our military was weakened before you got into office. And we saw troop strength reaching levels that were pre-World-War-Two levels. It wasn’t just in troop strength, but it also was with our equipment.

And whether it’s support of the military — preparing our troops to win, understanding that you don’t send our troops into battle unless they’re sent to win — you send them in to win or you don’t send them at all, and you know that. And you have been following these principles of understanding our enemies don’t respect weakness; they only respect strength. And as someone who is still in the Army Reserves, and knowing right now that we have men and women abroad, they can feel good when they go to sleep at night, and their parents can feel good when they go to sleep at night, knowing that you have their back.

And our greatest generation that fought our freedoms and liberties 75 years ago, they fought for that flag and our Constitution, and made this conversation today possible. I saw them, when they were with you in Normandy — those veterans, calling out to you from that backdrop like they were 18 or 19 years old again. They just wanted a moment to share with their President, just to get a thumbs up back. They were — they were little kids, even though they saved the world.

And I want to thank you not just for setting up our military for success, but taking care of our veterans. Because when they come home, they’re — they should be treated with the love, dignity, respect they deserve on behalf of a very grateful nation.

As a New Yorker, I want to say thank you for what was a phenomenal effort to deliver for us during this coronavirus outbreak. Between Suffolk and Nassau County, we had well over — as of right now, over 70,000 positive cases of coronavirus, between the Comfort, the Javits Center, field hospitals, Army medics. When you asked — when New York State asked you for public testing, immediately approved. They asked for private lab testing, immediately approved. They asked for semi-automated testing, immediately approved.

I remember getting on the phone with Mark Meadows, saying we needed ventilators. They — 4,000 ventilators show up within 48 hours. I remember getting on the phone late at — it was 10, 11 o’clock at night on a Saturday with Jared, and we’re talking about how the stockpile and Suffolk County was out of regular-sized N95 masks. The next day, you’re here in the White House talking about how you’re sending hundreds of thousands of N95 masks, and they arrive within the next 48 hours, and a quarter of a million surgical masks show up instantly.

I get on the phone, just a couple weeks ago, with the Secretary of Treasury about the municipal liquidity facility that was set up, to talk about how there is a need out there for these — a county like mine, not quite 2 million. We have a population of about 1.48 million. We didn’t qualify for the municipal liquidity facility. Secretary Mnuchin — the night of getting the last bill passed, he is on the phone and he’s working to take care of our issues. So, what Jared has done, and Admiral Polowczyk, and Avi Berkowitz, and others who are involved in that effort on the PPE, I want to say thank you. The Boeing Dreamliner is bringing PPE in right now that Suffolk ordered, and it’s just a huge help.

And the last thing I would say is this, and I — I stated the point about not just as a member of Congress, but also as a military veteran, thank you. I’ll also say, as a Jewish veteran, what happened to me when I was with you on Normandy — and many others who support you — and it happened again this morning when I put out a message about today being the 75th anniversary of VE Day, I got attacked, as a Jew, for supporting you. And the things that they were saying about you was so highly offensive to me.

And there’s never been a President ever who’s had the back of Jews in this country and around the world like you have. And whether it was moving the embassy in Israel to Jerusalem, and signing the Taylor Force Act into law, and recognizing Israeli sovereignty over the Golan Heights, but most importantly fighting anti-Semitism here at home, when I see them attacking me and attacking you — especially attacking you and your team, when you are all in more than any other President, not just delivering on your own campaign promises, but doing what’s right and delivering on the promises of Presidents in the past — I just want to say thank you.

And the Speaker — we’re all — we all should be in the same foxhole right now, with our rifles pointed in the same direction. And we’re all here in the same foxhole with you, with our rifles pointed in the same direction. But unfortunately, while you recognize that the enemy is coronavirus, the Speaker believes that the enemy is you. And I believe that’s really important for the Speaker to look around this room right now of people who serve in the House of Representatives who want to work today, are in Washington today, that she needs to get her conference back here to fight for the American public as hard as we do.

And I thank you for your leadership on all accounts and delivering for New York in what truly was a phenomenal way.

THE PRESIDENT: Thank you, Lee, very much. Appreciate it.

REPRESENTATIVE DAVIDSON: Thank you, Mr. President. Warren Davidson from Ohio. Definitely an honor to be included on this task force and be here really to work with you to help this transition to greatness. You’ve had great messages. It’s resonated with the whole country, but definitely with people in Ohio. We love you. We look forward to you coming back.

And, you know, I think the example that you set when you talked about the governors leading the way, because the states really have had different — different experiences and different — different approaches to dealing with this virus, but also a legacy of dealing with problems in a different way. And you see the legacy costs in states like Illinois, where 58 percent of their budget goes to pensions. And states like Ohio, where we have a rainy day fund and we reformed our pensions and have been responsible with our spending. That approach is important.

It was important in the way that — that Attorney General Barr has recognized in terms of defending civil liberties. Every single one of us wants to protect public health, and we’re all anxious to grow our economy, and get it back. But we all swore that same oath I swore in the Army, to support and defend our Constitution against all enemies, foreign and domestic.

So, we take that very seriously in the civil liberties that have been infringed upon the sense of freedom and the sense of identity as Americans that’s under attack on — in this era. Having the Department of Justice say we are going to defend freedom and lead that example is a big deal.

And as we confront all these ideas on how to deal with, you know, safety, it’s important to remember that even the Patriot Act expansion — it was just temporary. It was supposed to expire. And a lot of those same sense of urgency that came in after 9/11 led to the expansion of FISA and the Patriot Act, and the way it was abused against many people — and very publicly against you — was really just to keep us safe. And just for now.

But we still haven’t really been able to reform FISA. We still have a chance to do that. But the temptation is always: “But just to keep us safe.” And some of the ideas with privacy — just to keep us safe at the CDC, tracing and quarantining and tracking everybody — could be just as dangerous. So it’s good to safeguard against that.

And then, I think the last thing is, we’re talking about VE Day. You know, the last time the planet had this much debt was after World War Two, after the United States — so the Fed has been tremendous in trying to provide stability in the face of governments largely closing our economy. So we did owe it to people to try to provide the stability that we did. But most people realize that you can’t print an entire year of GDP.

So we do have to be cautious about unsettling the monetary system. It’s worked great for us since Bretton Woods. We have — we have been the world’s reserve currency, and we wouldn’t want to give that up by being foolish with the amount of printing we’re doing. Because it’s not being lent. There’s no lender. We’re not really borrowing it; we’re printing it. And that’s undermining the value of the full faith and credit of the United States. We have lots of countries doing that around the world, and the dollar still is the strong one. But we should be cautious to think that we can somehow do this in an unlimited way.

So thanks for the things you’re doing and the leadership you’re doing leading by example, and it’s an honor to be part of it.

Thank you.

THE PRESIDENT: Thank you, Warren. Thank you very much.

MR. BIGGS: Mr. President, I’m Andy Biggs — Arizona. Thanks for letting me be here with you today. Thanks for coming to Arizona this week, meeting at Phoenix in Honeywell — a factory converted, doing 10 million N95 masks —

THE PRESIDENT: Right.

REPRESENTATIVE BIGGS: — on a regular basis. And there’s going to be 10 more out of their Rhode Island plant. Thanks for being there. We had Sammy’s Restaurant from Tucson up, but we also had several Latina business owners — owners there that are strong supporters. And why are they supporters? Because of the economy that you built and you put in place. I

And Arizona is ready to open up. They’re energetic. They want to open up. They have faith and confidence in you and your leadership because they know what happened before. You built a — you built a marvelous economy: lower taxes, reduced regulations. That really did a great number for our economy and that’s fantastic.

I’ll tell you, we are just as frustrated that — that Speaker Pelosi won’t bring us back to do work that we need to be doing. We — we need to set the example for the American people that we’re ready to be here. If you can go to a Starbucks Coffee, as Kevin said yesterday, you should be able to come to Congress.

So, just so you know, the House Freedom Caucus is — we — we had a meeting last night. We’ll be meeting everyday next week here in Washington, D.C. We want Speaker Pelosi to know we’re ready to work. We come to work. We represent the people.

Thanks for your leadership, Mr. President.

THE PRESIDENT: Thank you very much, Andy.

REPRESENTATIVE BIGGS: It’s an honor to be with you.

THE PRESIDENT: Thank you.

REPRESENTATIVE BARR: Mr. President, Andy Barr from Central Kentucky. Thanks for your leadership and for inviting us here today. I want to share with you three quick stories from my district that illustrate how effective your administration has been in responding to this public health emergency. These stories have not been reported by the press, so I want to direct these stories to the press because they need to know how effective you all have been in responding to us and the American people.

First is Dr. Mark Dougherty, an epidemiologist at Baptist Lexington — largest private hospital in my district — a nationally known infectious disease expert. He comes to me in March, early in the pandemic, and he says, “We can do a plas- — convalescent plasma therapy.” He was one of the first epidemiologists in the country to — to want to do this. He went to your FDA, sir, and within four hours received approval to do convalescent plasma therapy — saved two lives on Sunday night. The approval was on Friday.

Second, he comes to me and he says, “We can save personal protective equipment if we use telemedicine within the hospital. The problem is we need approval from the federal government to do that.” So, we go to CMS, to Seema Verma, and we say, “We can do a Bluetooth stethoscope with an iPad and telemedicine and FaceTime. We don’t have to send all the healthcare workers into the negative pressure room. We can — we can bring modern technology to the fight against COVID. We can protect healthcare workers and we can conserve critical personal protective equipment.”

Within days, Seema Verma and her team at CMS responded favorably. That is a nationwide policy change that saves lives for healthcare workers and conserves scarce personal protective equipment.

And then the — and then the next story is Steve Stone from Nicholasville Kentucky. He works for Sagent pharmaceuticals. He comes to us and he says, “There is a critical shortage of the sedative propofol, which is used for COVID patients on ventilators.”

In New York, by the way, there was a shipment of a month-worth of propofol that was held up by the — the government of Italy. So we got on the phone with Admiral Polowzcyk from the — on your team — on Saturday morning. On Tuesday, he had talked to the State Department and had the Italian government release to New York lifesaving propofol for intubated COVID patients in New York City — a month’s supply. And that was your administration and Admiral Polowzcyk responding instantly to that request.

And then the third story is Secretary Mnuchin and his team and Mark Meadows. We went to — we — we had a small-business owner who was not approved in the first round of PPP because he bought the business after February 15. But this is a 35-year- old business — a dozen employees, $60,000-a-year jobs, a small business publication. We went to Mark Meadows, Secretary Mnuchin, his team. And within days, they changed the guidelines — frequently asked questions, new guidelines. We saved 12 jobs in Lexington, Kentucky, because of your decisive action.

So Mr. President, thank you for the effective response to this pandemic and this crisis.

THE PRESIDENT: Thank you. Thank you very much, Andy.

REPRESENTATIVE PERRY: Good afternoon, Mr. President. Scott Perry from Pennsylvania. I want to first thank you for acknowledging those NCAA championship wrestlers from Penn State. Jim Jordan, of course, as you know, is a big fan of those Penn State wrestlers. (Laughter.)

Mr. President, thank you so much for your — your bold, visionary, decisive leadership. It has made a huge difference in Pennsylvania in the district I represent and across the — the Keystone State. The PPP, in particular, saved countless — countless jobs. It has been a lifeline for — for the small businesses across the country, across our state. And of course, running it through the local banks, getting government out of it, letting the banks — our local community banks — handle that, has been just — it’s — because that’s who people know. They have a relationship, and the bankers, of course, know them.

And so, that’s worked — that’s worked really well. But I will tell you, in the transition to greatness, what I don’t think we did envision is the same bold vision and leadership that you’ve had in our — some of our state governors. And right now, just last night, our governor announced that we in Pennsylvania are going to stay locked down until June 4th.

Mr. President, our — our businesses are dying. And — and I don’t know what — look, you know, we — we shouldn’t have to make this choice. We’re Americans and we can do two things at one time. You have proven you can do many things at one time and be effective. We have about 65 percent of our deaths in Pennsylvania happening in eldercare facilities, at — at assisted living facilities. Not in hospitals, but at these eldercare facilities. The PPE is going to the hospitals. The money — a lot is going to hospitals because we shut them down.

The governor has made the choice: Instead of helping some of these eldercare facilities, we have a website where people can snitch on their neighbor who’s going to work or who’s opening their business in — in contradiction to the order. That — that’s not bringing anybody together.

So a couple of things: extending the PPP the eight weeks until after the governor opens the state. Because employers now don’t want to have to pay for employees who are not going to be able to come back to work, right? Because the — the state is shutdown. You didn’t do that. The governor has done that. Right?

PARTICIPANT: (Inaudible.)

THE PRESIDENT: Good idea.

REPRESENTATIVE PERRY: So — so to transition to greatness, I think might include something like that. Right now, we have counties that want to open up. The governor said no. Counties want to open up. They’re not sure. They’re scared that if they open up and — and, again, violating, so to speak, the governor’s order, that that will stop the flow of — of federal dollars for the programs that you already have. And so some assurance that they can do the right thing and get their people back to work as Americans would be very, very helpful.

I would say this as well, Mr. President: the unemployment benefits, in the real world — we tried to do the right thing; you tried to do the right thing. Employers are thankful for the fact that they — they won’t be held accountable if their employee doesn’t come back to work.

But when you have a governor that doesn’t want to enforce the policy, it’s not really helpful because the employer needs the employee to come back.

THE PRESIDENT: Right.

REPRESENTATIVE PERRY: They need them to come back. And so, take — maybe take a look at that.

And finally, in this transition to greatness, Mr. President, China — once we get through this, there must be an accountability. There must be an accountability. And we all want to get back. We’re here. We’re ready to be at work. Speaker Pelosi apparently is not. But if she is going to do phase four, she’s working on her own. She doesn’t involve our leadership. She doesn’t involve Kevin. She doesn’t involve anybody here.

Mr. President, the prescription to get us back to work and healthy as an economy, quite honestly, is simple. And you already know it. You’ve already talked about it a million times. Let’s just get back to work. Let’s just get back to work.

Thank you, Mr. President.

THE PRESIDENT: Thank you very much. Great.

REPRESENTATIVE MURPHY: Thank you, Mr. President. Greg Murphy from Eastern North Carolina. I appreciate your strength. I appreciate your persistence. I’m a surgeon and I appreciate decisiveness. It’s been nothing but a merciless last four years that Schumer, Pelosi, and her cabal have essentially tried to undo the 2016 election. I’ve only been in politics a relatively short period of time, but it’s obvious to me that there are people in this country who hate you and hate this administration more than they love this country. And they will see it torn down. This crisis has highlighted this. We thought that this possibly could be a way of bringing our nation together. But unfortunately, partisan politics has ruled the day.

This has been building a plane while we’ve been flying it. I think that’s a very good analogy, but the plane is built and it’s time to land. It’s time that we made decisions based upon fact, not fiction, not fear mongering, not cartoons by the media, but truth. And wouldn’t it be nice to get the truth?

We believe enough in our American people that we believe in what they can think. So I would ask the same for you from North Carolina that you do from Pennsylvania — to talk to our governor to let us come back to work. Let us look at a regional approach in North Carolina. It makes sense. We look at the science; we can do this. We’re not inventing the wheel again.

So I thank you for your strength. I thank you for your persistence and your leadership.

THE PRESIDENT: Thank you very much. Thank you.

REPRESENTATIVE JOHNSON: Mr. President, Mike Johnson. Thanks for having us today. We’re — we’ve been anxious to get back to the Hill, and we wish we could be in the House doing our regular work and hopefully we’ll get back to that.

I represent two important groups today: One is the — the resilient, hardworking people of Louisiana. We’ve taken a — we’ve had a tough run here. I mean, the pandemic hit us pretty hard. And then, of course, we’ve got the crisis in the oil and gas market and we’re going to recover from that. But the people there are soundly behind you. And so many of them always tell me when they know I’m coming back here to give you their regards and their encouragement and their thanks for what you doing, your principled leadership.

I would echo what’s going on in Pennsylvania and North Carolina — Louisiana, as well. Our Governor is keeping us shut down and our free market needs a chance to thrive. And if we can do that, we will. It needs to be a region-by-region basis.

The second group I’m here, I guess, representing this morning, is the Republican Study Committee — you know, the largest caucus of conservatives in Congress. And as the chair of that group — all these guys are leaders of it as well — and we’ve been trying to advance our core principles. And we came out on Monday last with a 37-point blueprint, a framework that we call a return to “prosperity and accountability and recovery.” And basically what we’ve done is distilled the work that we had been putting into about 15 months prior to the pandemic to come up with a playbook, a conservative playbook, to run when we return to the majority, which we still think we can do.

But it’s — it’s things — for example, for holding China accountable, all the way to empowering the American worker. And we think it’s consistent with a lot of the administration and what you’ve articulated, and we hope we work together on it.

I would end with this: the whole team — your whole administration has been so accessible and transparent. I love what Dan said. I had written those two words down before you said it. That — that marks the Trump administration. And I could name each one of them on your team here. They’ve all been helpful and grateful to us.

We had a conference call with Mr. Kudlow the other day, and he said something at the end of it that resonated with me. He said, “You know, our time-tested principles cannot be abandoned now.” That’s what’s going to guide us through this. Right? And we all — we were on mute, but we all said “Amen.”

And it reminded me of what Reagan said in his farewell address when he was leaving, you know, his storied time at the head of the country. He said, “They call me the great communicator, but I wasn’t that.” He said, “I was just communicating great things, and they’re the same great things that have guided our country since its founding.”

We believe in those time-honored principles. We believe in individual freedom and limited government and fiscal responsibility and free markets and lower taxes and less regulation. Those are the things that are going to guide the country back in this transition you’re talking about. And we’re so grateful that you and your team are holding the line on that. We’ll be with you. We’re your foot soldiers. We’re ready to go to work. And we thank you again for all you’re doing.

THE PRESIDENT: Thank you very much. Great.

REPRESENTATIVE LESKO: Well, I want to say thank you again, President Trump, for coming to Arizona. And it was such an honor to be on Air Force One with you. It was my first time, so it was awesome.

THE PRESIDENT: Good. Good.

REPRESENTATIVE LESKO: But I want you to know that I believe you are exactly the right person for the job. Despite all of the Democrats, the top Obama people, maybe President Obama himself — since we found out yesterday — trying to take you out. You — despite all of that, you led our nation into the greatest economy in the world. And I am totally convinced that you will do it again.

And so, please don’t let all the critics get you down. I know a lot of people are just Trump haters, and they say mean things. But there are so many people out there, so many people in Arizona, throughout the nation that absolutely think you’re doing a great job. So please keep it up.

THE PRESIDENT: Thank you, Debbie.

REPRESENTATIVE LESKO: We appreciate you.

THE PRESIDENT: Thank you very much, Debbie.

REPRESENTATIVE LESKO: Thank you.

THE PRESIDENT: Beautiful. Thank you.

Larry.

MR. KUDLOW: Thank you, sir. And thanks to everybody here. Some wonderful words. And we appreciate your strong efforts and support, and we have a lot more to do.

I just want to connect the dot or two. Kevin was talking — Kevin Hassett, my friend and colleague — when we were in the Oval last night, talking about — these are temporary job losses, probably three quarters of them, if not more.

If you had told me that I would go on the air on a day when we lost 20 million jobs and the stock market would go up 400 points, that would have been very interesting. (Laughter.) I’ve been around a while, and I thought I’d seen it all, but this was a new wrinkle. This is — I don’t want to repeat this experiment, but I’m just saying.

And I do think it’s because it’s temporary. And I do also think the stock market bottomed on March 23rd. I know it fluctuates and so forth, but I think that a lot of the things that Steven has negotiated, and we’ve heard about PPP — extending it, and so forth — I think that’s one reason why these are temporary losses and why the market is shrugging them off.

And I do want to reiterate: It is very possible that we will get a lot of these jobs back fast. It’s very possible, as private surveys and even the CBO, we will have a 20 percent increase in growth in the second half of this year, as you say, sir, as a transition.

And then, finally, I want to say that — and I appreciate your comments very much, sir — if we stay to the principles that worked the first three years — I mean through January and February of this year, the economy was growing at 3.1 percent at an annual rate before the virus hit. Low taxes; rollback of regulations; energy independence; good, fair, reciprocal trade deals — the building blocks of a blue-collar boom, of a middle-class wage boom, middle-class wages and less, and a small-business boom, which is the heart of the Republican Party.

There’s no reason — you did it once. And if we stay with those principles, we’ll do it again. And next year, 2021, can be absolutely a spectacular year. So I really believe that.

And will just say, it is my honor to be a part of this, sir. Thank you.

THE PRESIDENT: Thank you very much, Larry.

SECRETARY MNUCHIN: Thank you, Mr. President. I want to thank everybody around the table. I’ve had the opportunity to speak to almost all of you and all of your ideas.

As others have said, it’s the President’s economic policies that led us to great success. I have the utmost confidence we have the greatest scientists, the greatest medical people. There will be a vaccine. We will kill this virus. And the policies that you’ve put in place recently are protecting American workers and American business as we go through this difficult time.

So, thank you Mr. President.

THE PRESIDENT: Well, thank you, Steve. I appreciate it very much. And you’ve done a great job.

So we’re looking at the transition to greatness. And I think it’s starting right now. It’s really what it is. It’s a — it’s a great term. It just came out at this meeting. (Laughter.) That’s right. It came out by accident. It was a statement and it came out and you can’t get a better one. We can go to Madison Avenue and get the best — the greatest geniuses in the world to come up with a slogan, but that’s the slogan we’re going to use: “Transition to Greatness.” And it’s starting right now.

And I appreciate — everybody we called, we said, “Can you be here?” They hopped on a plane. Is that right, Mark? They hopped on a plane. Not one person turned you down.

MR. MEADOWS: That’s right.

THE PRESIDENT: This was just a quickly set up meeting, because the Republicans want to be here. And the Democrats have to come back and they have to get it going.

And they’re asking for things that they didn’t ask for upfront, but it’s what they wanted. And they want things and we’re happy with what’s gone on. We got what we needed and — but, at the same time, we want to do what’s right for the country.

So we’ll see what they’re looking for and we’ll — we’re in a position, for the first time in a little while — you would never put yourself in that position, but we wouldn’t agree to what they wanted. And it got sort of delayed, delayed, delayed and now they need things and we can sit back and we’re going to watch. And we’ll do what’s right for the country.

But, so, it’s the transition to greatness. That’s where we are. That’s where it’s starting right now. And I appreciate everybody for being here. And we’re going to have a little meeting after the media goes. Do you have any questions?

Q Yeah, Mr. President —

THE PRESIDENT: Jon?

Q Can you bring us up to speed about the member of the Vice President’s staff who has now tested positive for coronavirus? This is now the second staffer in the West Wing.

THE PRESIDENT: Yeah. Yeah. Well, I don’t know much about it. Does anybody want to talk about it? It’s — she’s a wonderful young woman. Katie. She tested very good for a long period of time, and then all of a sudden, today she tested positive. She hasn’t come into contact with me. She spends some time with the Vice President. It’s, I believe, the press person, right? It’s a press person. So she tested positive out of the blue.

This is why the whole concept of tests aren’t necessarily great. The tests are perfect, but something can happen between a test — where it’s good, and then something happens, and all of a sudden — she was tested very recently and tested negative. And then today, I guess, for some reason, she tested positive.

So Mike knows about it, and Mike has done what he has to do. I think he’s on an airplane going to some faraway place. But you’ll be able to ask him later on.

But they’ve taken all of the necessary precautions. I understand Mike has been tested — Vice President — and he tested negative.

Q Mr. President, but if this can happen here at the White House — two people tested positive —

THE PRESIDENT: It can happen anywhere.

Q It can happen — what —

THE PRESIDENT: You see where it happens.

Q Why should the American people feel confident going back to work, then?

THE PRESIDENT: No, no — because, well, that — then it would happen anyway, whether you did go back to work or whether you didn’t go back to work.

In fact, I saw a statistic come out of New York yesterday that was pretty strange — that most of the cases are coming from apartments and coming from homes. What was that all about? I think they said 66 percent. Did you see that? That was given by Governor Cuomo — that they’re coming out of the home. Right?

So, it can happen anywhere. It’s a very elusive enemy — a vicious enemy, an elusive enemy. And I think more importantly than anything, with this one, it’s probably the most contagious enemy that anybody has seen.

Q Mr. President —

THE PRESIDENT: Yeah, please.

Q Given two positive tests in the last two days, what precautions are you taking here at the White House to prevent the virus from spreading further? And are you worried that it’s kind of already in the White House and might be (inaudible) —

THE PRESIDENT: Well, I’m not worried. No, I’m not worried. But, you know, look, I get things done. I don’t worry about things. I do what I have to do. We’ve taken very strong precautions at the White House. But again, we’re dealing with a invisible situation. Nobody knows.

When I see that 66 in New York — 66 percent, where people stay home and that’s where they’re catching it, at home. Who would ever think a thing like that is possible?

So, the — all you can do is take precaution and do it the best you can. But Mike was tested today and Mike was tested negative.

Q Sir, are you taking additional steps here at the White House in light of —

THE PRESIDENT: Yeah, we’re taking very official steps. Mark, do you want to discuss that?

MR. MEADOWS: We’ve already put in a few protocols that we’re looking at, obviously, to make sure that the President and his immediate staff stay safe. But it’s not just the President; it’s all the workers that are here. Obviously, you’re here on a — on a daily basis.

But the protocols that we’re putting in place puts — puts a stronger emphasis on making sure that we do the mitigation that we need to do to make sure they’re safe.

I don’t want to get into all of the procedures that we have embarked upon, but I can tell you this is probably the safest place that you can come to. All of you, as you know, have to be socially distanced from the President. His meetings that he has are done with a social-distancing plan in place. Outside of that, we may take some additional precautions as it relates to the Vice President and the President, in terms of just making sure that the people that come in contact with both of them are done — that it’s done in a way that makes sure that we keep the President safe.

Additionally, every member that came here today, they were tested just in case there’s a closer contact than we might have. But we — we’ve put in some additional protocols over the last 48 hours, and we’ll continue to monitor it.

Q Mr. President, are you satisfied with the measures that have been taken so far?

THE PRESIDENT: I really am. Look, I understand what we’re dealing with. We’re dealing with something very serious. And the fact that you have it doesn’t mean that it doesn’t go away. All right? You can have it and get through it very easily. Some people have a harder time. Most people get through it. Some people are devastated by it.

But the fact that you get it doesn’t mean — I’ve had numerous people say they have it, and a couple of days later, they’re better. Some people say they have it, they think, and there’s almost no symptom. Other people have it, and bad things happen.

So — but for the most part, when you have it, you get better. And supposedly, you’re immune. Although, they’re not 100 percent sure about how long that immunity lasts.

Yeah, please.

Q And is there — Mr. President, is there a reason why people just aren’t wearing masks at the White House?

THE PRESIDENT: Well, they are. People that —

Q But they’re not, sir.

THE PRESIDENT: No, people that are serving me are. The people —

Q We have not seen anyone wear a mask around you for the last two weeks.

THE PRESIDENT: Well —

MR. MEADOWS: Yep. So I can speak to that. You know, as we look at this, the people that are in close proximity to the President obviously have tested negative. What the — the mask that you wear is generally to keep other people from being infected. And so, as we look at that — you know, I can tell you, the testing protocol is a strong regimen. And as it gets close to the President, some of those that serve him will wear a mask in those closer proximities.

Here’s what I would offer, off the record, to all of you is — I know, Jon, we spoke about this earlier — if you’ve been on — on the campus, for your safety and well-being, the President has made available to make sure that you could have testing just for the peace of mind. So before you leave today, we’ve made those arrangements to make sure that you can be tested as well.

THE PRESIDENT: But we have a lot of people wearing them. I’m just looking around. Look at Shea, White House photographer. I’m sure most of you don’t know her, but to the best of my knowledge, she is wearing a mask. Is that a mask? Yes. (Laughter.) I think, to the best of my knowledge, it looks like a mask.

Q Mr. President, can you clarify the status of the phase four negotiations? Earlier, Larry said that they were being paused and potentially for a couple of weeks.

THE PRESIDENT: Well, we’re in no rush. We’re no rush.

Q When you see jobs and unemployment, why aren’t you in a rush?

THE PRESIDENT: The Democrats — the Democrats have to do what they have to do, but I would say we’re — we’re not looking. We want to see what they have. But I can’t say that we’re in a rush. We were in a rush to get the money out to people. We have gotten the money out. Some money is stalled because of state machines — state machinery. You know, they have old computers and — 45-year-old computers.

And we said this was going to happen, and I didn’t want to do it that way, but the Democrats insisted on going through this particular apparatus for a certain reason. And that money is stalled. But that’s their — that’s their fault. And they accept — I think they accept responsibility and blame the Democrats.

Q Mr. President, you said recently that you would, if necessary, be the first person to get a vaccine. How important do you think a vaccine ultimately is? (Inaudible.)

THE PRESIDENT: Well, I didn’t say I wanted to. That’s not a correct statement. I said — you said, “Would you be?”

Q Yeah.

THE PRESIDENT: And I said, “If it was good for the country, I’d be. And if it was bad for the country, I’ll — I’ll wait to be the last one or I wouldn’t do it at all.

No, I was asked whether or not I would do it as the first person. If I thought that was a good thing for the country, I would. I don’t — you know, personally — and I have to say, I think we’re doing very well on vaccines. If they wanted to use me as a test, that’s okay with me, if it was good. But that was really the way the question was asked.

Q So — but how important do you believe a vaccine is to getting out of this? And what do you say to those that — you know, this growing anti-vaccine —

THE PRESIDENT: Well, I feel about vaccines like I feel about tests. This is going to go away without a vaccine. It’s going to go away, and it’s — we’re not going to see it again, hopefully, after a period of time. You may have some — some flare-ups and I guess, you know, I would expect that. Sometime in the fall, you’ll have flare-ups maybe. Maybe not. But according to what a lot of people say, you probably will. We’ll be able to put them out. You may have some flare-ups next year, but eventually, it’s going to be gone. I mean, it’s going to be gone.

You know, there are some viruses and flus that came, and they went for a vaccine, they never found the vaccine, and they’ve disappeared. They’ve never shown up again. They got — they die too, like everything else. They die too.

And so, whether we do or not, I think great progress is being made by Johnson & Johnson, by Oxford, and some others — NYU, I see, is very advanced. But if you don’t get it, this is going to go away at some point.

Q Mr. President, what evidence have you seen that this is going to go away without a vaccine?

THE PRESIDENT: I just rely on what doctors say. They say it’s going to go — that doesn’t mean this year, it doesn’t mean it’s going to be gone, frankly, by the fall or after the fall. But eventually, it’s going to go away. The question is will we need a vaccine? At some point, it will probably go away by itself. If we had a vaccine, that would be very helpful. I’d be very happy to have a vaccine.

Q How often do you meet with Dr. Birx, Dr. Fauci, and the medical experts? Or have you essentially just moved yourself onto the economic aspect?

THE PRESIDENT: No, I listen to them. I have a lot of respect for them. Dr. Birx, Dr. Fauci — and we have some other people that are very good. No, I listen to them very, very intently.

Q But how often do you meet with them?

THE PRESIDENT: Talk up. You have a mask on your face.

Q How often do you meet with the medical staff and the (inaudible)?

THE PRESIDENT: A lot. A lot.

Q Mr. President, do you find the CDC protocols to be an impediment to opening up the country?

THE PRESIDENT: Which protocols?

Q The recommended guidelines that have been — that have been —

THE PRESIDENT: No, because I’m relying on the governors, and the governors are the ones that are doing that. And if I see something wrong, I’ll clamp down on it very hard and very strongly. But I’m relying on 50 very talented governors. I don’t think they are all talented, but many of them are very talented.

Q Why are you not releasing those guidelines to —

THE PRESIDENT: They’re released. They know what to do and they know what they’re doing, and we’re going to see. But I’m relying on the governors to do their individual states and they’re relying on us very strongly for advice and also for help, with respect to equipment, hospitals, beds, ventilators, but also medical supplies. So they’re relying on us, and we’re able to get them everything they need, if they can’t get them. Ideally, they can get it.

But much of the things that we’re getting and we’ve gotten for them, we’re able to stockpile in their states. So we’re sending it around. We’re sending more than they need. So if this should happen again, they’re going to be ready this time.

Q And what happens though if the infections go — spike, once the government —

THE PRESIDENT: You have to put out the fires. Then you’re going to have to put out the fires, and the governors should be able to do that.

Q Mr. President, you said the third quarter would be a transition, and the fourth quarter would be good. Where do you expect to see the unemployment numbers at that time?

THE PRESIDENT: Well, I think the unemployment numbers are going to go way up. And the statement that Kevin made is incredible. The — everybody expects to have a job back very shortly. That’s not a normal situation. You go into a bad, bad economy — you know, a deep recession or worse — nobody expects to have a job ever again. Everybody expects — I saw that chart. Almost everybody expects that they’ll be working again.

This was an artificial turning off of a tremendous economy. We did the right thing because we saved millions of lives, probably millions of lives. But this was just — all of a sudden, one day, we had to turn it off. When we turn it back on, which we’ve just started doing, I think it’s going to come back blazing. I think next year has a chance to be one of the best years, economically, we’ve ever had because there is tremendous pent-up demand.

Q So if unemployment is at 14 percent now, perhaps going as high as 20 percent, where do you think that will be in the fourth quarter?

THE PRESIDENT: I think the number is going to be a great number. I can’t — I’m not going to say exactly what. I can say, over a period of time, it’s going to be where it was. Maybe better. You can’t get much better; we were at 3.5 percent. But it will be, I think — I expect it to be where it was. The demand is going to be tremendous. And next year is going to be a tremendous year. The fourth quarter is going to be very good, maybe better than that.

The transition is going to be very interesting, but you’re going to see some very good numbers coming out of the third quarter. It’s a transition. I call it the transition to greatness. We’re going to have a great year next year. You’ll see.

Q But do you think we can dug out by the third or fourth quarter of this year, economically?

THE PRESIDENT: Well, the third quarter, we’re moving in that direction. Right? I would say it’s starting right about now. We’re going to start moving in that direction. But the third quarter will be — I think it’s going to be very good. It’s going to be a very good indicator, but it’s going to be very good.

But it is a transition quarter. The fourth quarter is going to be good. It could be maybe more than good, Kevin. And next year is going to be — I think it’s going to be a really powerful year, economically.

Q Mr. President, Larry said this morning that he expects the May unemployment numbers to also be, you know, problematic and to be very high. What are you and your administration and these lawmakers, what are you all —

THE PRESIDENT: Well, the May numbers — we haven’t started coming out of it.

Q But what are you all doing to provide relief to workers over the next (inaudible)?

THE PRESIDENT: Well, we’re doing a lot. Look at all of the money — we took $2 trillion and we’re spending it all over because we want to have a — we’re throwing money at it. And over the years, they’ve learned that’s much better than not doing it.

Q So are you —

THE PRESIDENT: Look at 1928.

Q Are you (inaudible) direct payments (inaudible)?

THE PRESIDENT: In 1928, they raised interest rates and they raised taxes. How did that work out? Not too good. Not too good. But if you look at 1928, 1929, the first thing they did was raise taxes. And then they raised interest rates and they choked everybody to death. And it took 15 years to recover — more than that. So, we — we do it — we’re doing it the right way. We have a lot of great students of finance. I’m one of them. And we’re throwing money at it.

And I’ll tell you what: I’ve watched some people that — and read some people that I would say would not have agreed with that. And I haven’t seen anybody disagree with what we’re doing. And in fact, they say what we’re doing with the PPP, with, you know, all of the things that we’re doing, is — is great.

One thing we could do is a payroll tax cut. That seems to bother the Democrats. One thing with a payroll tax cut though, it’s over a little bit longer period of time. But a payroll tax cut is something that some people that are very smart — I’m one of those people that like it, because I think it’s really sustainable. I think it’s — it will sustain it. But that’s one thing that a lot of people would like to see.

Q Mr. President, you were with some —

THE PRESIDENT: Another thing they’d like to see is a capital gains tax cut, meaning no capital gains — some Republicans — or it’s true, true hardline Republicans around the table, not all of them. Some people might say — Louie, might say, “Forget it.” But some people would say that a capital gains stoppage — cutting capital gains, getting rid of capital gains tax — they’ve said that for many years — would be a great thing.

The true conservative Republicans around this table, of which there are about seven — seven solid — but I still like the other ones, too. (Laughter.) But they would say that — they would say that’s music to their ears, right?

So, we’ll see. I would — I would be in favor of that. Yeah.

Q Mr. President, you were with seven American heroes earlier today — these World War Two veterans.

THE PRESIDENT: I was.

Q All in their 90s. Did you consider wearing a mask when you were with them, given they’re in a vulnerable —

THE PRESIDENT: No, because I was very far away. I appreciate the question. I was very far away from them, as you know. I would’ve loved to have gone up and hugged them, because they’re great. I had a conversation with everyone, but we were very far away. You saw.

Plus, the wind was blowing so hard in such a direction that if — if the plague ever reached them, I’d be very surprised. It could’ve reached me too. You didn’t worry about me; you’re only worried about them. And that’s okay because I think they’re so pure, it will never happen. All right? They’ve lived a great life.

But, no, the wind was howling. And I didn’t see anybody with a mask. I don’t know, maybe there were. But they were — they were great. I had conversations with them, but I was standing, as you noticed — would you say I was quite far away?

Q (Inaudible.)

THE PRESIDENT: Thank you, Jon.

Q Mr. President —

THE PRESIDENT: Appreciate that. Your book was very good, by the way. (Laughter.)

Q Thank you.

Q It was better than I thought it would be. (Laughter.) No, it was actually a very good book, but it was actually better about me than I thought it would be, so I appreciate it. You knew me for — you’ve known me for a long time.

Q Twenty-six years.

THE PRESIDENT: This wasn’t really in the schedule, right? I knew him long before I thought in terms of this. But we had one very good story — right? — when we were interviewed at the hotel. And he took a lot of guff. They said, “He’s not running. Why are you doing…” This was before I announced. And I’d been toying with it for a long time, but never did it, never decided. And he took a lot of guff, but he also got great ratings when he did that interview, so I don’t know. But it was — it turned out to be a very interesting interview, sort of the first, so.

Q It was a good interview, sir. It was a good interview.

THE PRESIDENT: Yeah, your book is very good. Congratulations.

Q Thank you.

THE PRESIDENT: How is it doing?

Q Bestseller list.

THE PRESIDENT: Bestseller.

Q Bestseller, yeah.

THE PRESIDENT: That’s good.

Q Like Congressman Crenshaw.

THE PRESIDENT: That’s good.

PARTICIPANT: Dan has a bestseller.

THE PRESIDENT: Oh, Dan. Dan is doing good, right? Well, is that because I endorsed his book? (Laughter.) That’s a great book.

REPRESENTATIVE CRENSHAW: (Inaudible.)

THE PRESIDENT: That’s — I’ll tell you, he did something else great. He did a —

PARTICIPANT: Kevin thinks it’s the best book ever written.

THE PRESIDENT: — a thing on Nancy Pelosi that was so incisive. You — did you see that? He did something that was so incredible. And I actually — I actually pinned it on top right, Dan?

MR. SCAVINO: Yes, sir.

THE PRESIDENT: We pinned it on top. You were fantastic. You’ve — have you done this before?

REPRESENTATIVE CRENSHAW: Yeah, I (inaudible) this all the time. You should share — share more. (Laughter.)

THE PRESIDENT: That’s true. I’ll tell you, great job, Dan. You’re a great guy. He’s a great guy. So when he — is that it? Are you guys all finished?

Q Well, one more, Mr. President.

THE PRESIDENT: Yeah, go ahead. What kind of a mask is that?

Q It’s a — it’s a mask. It’s a blue mask.

THE PRESIDENT: Looks like a catcher’s helmet.

Q What?

THE PRESIDENT: That looks like a catcher’s helmet. Go ahead. The mask.

Q I used to play catcher, so that makes sense.

A federal watchdog found that Rick Bright’s removal from HHS was improper and they’re blocking that move right now. Do you — have you seen that report? And do you have any response to it?

THE PRESIDENT: I don’t know. He — to me, he looks like a disgruntled employee. I don’t know who he is. But to me, he’s a disgruntled employee. And if people were that unhappy, they shouldn’t work. If you’re unhappy with a company, you shouldn’t work there. Go out, get something else. But, to me, he’s a disgruntled guy, and I hadn’t heard great things about him either.

Q Mr. President, about to Lieutenant General Michael Flynn, he pleaded guilty twice and admitted, before God, that he had lied. How does that comport with your present position?

THE PRESIDENT: Well, I’ll — I’ll just go — and these guys can give you a better answer than I could, most of them in this room. But I’ll tell you what: Number one, they played the son game: “We’re going to go after your son.” And — number one. And number two, the FBI guys, as I know it, and I found out, Devin, they didn’t think he lied at all. They said, “He didn’t lie. He didn’t…” They didn’t know what they were talking about.

And Mueller’s group — Mueller’s gang that didn’t find that I did much, did they? After wasting three years. But Mueller’s gang of culprits, they said, “He lied.” But the FBI, in this case, said he didn’t lie. What’s the story in that, Devin?

REPRESENTATIVE NUNES: Well, you have to remember that this is a 30-some-year veteran of our military, who headed the Defense Intelligence Agency. It would be preposterous to think that he was a Russian agent. And everybody in the press knew this. They had early versions of the dossier. They knew the Democrats were pushing the dossier.

And the fact that someone would even ask this question about General Flynn, who was clearly — he was exonerated on January 4th, before you were even sworn in to office — we know that from the FBI agents who were view- — reviewing the case. I’m not even sure it was properly predicated to review General Flynn in the first place.

You know, there’s a lot of people in this town, in the swamp, that all of these people in the media know, that work on behalf of foreign agents and aren’t registered. And General Flynn, who’s a 30-year war veteran, the way that he’s been treated, the way his family has been treated, the way that he’s lost his — his livelihood. He lost his house. And I think the American people owe him a debt of gratitude, and this government owes him and his family an apology.

Q But do you have anything on Flynn? (Inaudible.)

THE PRESIDENT: And the FBI found — by the way, the FBI found he didn’t lie.

Okay, thank you, very much. Thank you very much.

END 2:49 P.M. EDT

Earlier today White House Press Secretary Kayleigh McEnany held a briefing with the press pool. During the press briefing Ms. McEnany highlighted the targeting of Michael Flynn. Video and Transcript below:

.

[Transcript] – MS. MCENANY: Good afternoon. Today marks the 75th anniversary of VE Day, a triumphant milestone in our nation’s history and indeed in world history. Seventy-five years ago today, our brave American forces defeated fascism in Europe. And through the selfless devotion of thousands of patriots, they saved the world.

Over 180,000 Americans gave their lives in the European theater during World War Two. And I want to take just a moment to honor their service and their sacrifice. Thank you to all of our veterans. You are truly, truly our heroes.

Now, as I move to my next subject, I want to begin by saying this: Look, our rank-and-file men and women at the FBI are heroes in their own right. They protect this country from domestic crime, and we thank them for their service. They work hard. And once again, we owe them a debt of gratitude. But that is separate and apart from what I’m about to address right now.

The FBI exists to investigate crimes. But in the case of Lieutenant General Michael Flynn, it appears that they might have existed to manufacture one. As the motion filed by the Department of Justice yesterday explained, the FBI set out to interview General Michael Flynn, when they had no predigate [sic] — predicate for any investigation of any crime.

Over the past week, we learned, from a handwritten note, the true intent behind the FBI’s investigation of Lieutenant General Michael Flynn. The very day that then-FBI Director Jim Comey sent agents to the White House to interview Flynn, the FBI discussed what their intent was beforehand. This is what they said: “What is our goal? Truth, admission? Or to get him to lie so we can prosecute him or get him fired?” These notes, in addition to other evidence, raise serious questions about the handling of the — of the FBI’s handling of Michael Flynn’s case.

Did the FBI confront Flynn with the intent to get him to lie so that we can prosecute him and fire him? Did the FBI manufacture a crime against Lieutenant General Michael Flynn?

Federal investigators appear to paint a target on the back of General Michael Flynn. Kimberley Strassel of The Wall Street Journal laid out, point by point, the very concerning aspects of this case, and I’m going to reiterate them as outlined in her column over the weekend:

In December 2016, Flynn spoke as the incoming national security advisor to the Russian ambassador. This call, as is customary, was recorded by the United States government. They record calls with foreigners. But in a highly irregular move, the intelligence community, under the Obama administration, unmasked the identity of Michael Flynn, a United States citizen, who is entitled to Fourth Amendment rights and to due process. But Lieutenant General Michael Flynn received none of that.

The intelligence community was hunting for evidence against General Flynn — evidence they did not find. We learned from newly released transcripts that in stark contrast to what former DNI James Clapper had been saying publicly, and contrary to what he was saying publicly, here’s what he was saying privately with regard to Russian collusion: “I never saw any direct empirical evidence that the Trump campaign or someone in it was plotting [or] conspiring with the Russians to meddle with the election.” Sounds awfully different from what he just said 10 days prior in a public capacity.

Having found no evidence of Russian collusion, the FBI came up with a new absurd theory that Flynn might have violated the Logan Act, a statute from 1799 that, in its 200 years of existence, had never been used to convict an American citizen, but it was resurrected in the case of Lieutenant General Michael Flynn.

Michael Flynn didn’t violate the Logan Act. Even the FBI did not think that General Flynn’s telephone call provided the predicate for a criminal investigation. In fact, in January of 2017, an internal FBI document concluded that Flynn was, quote, “no longer a valid viable candidate for investigation.” Disgraced FBI agent and noted Trump hater, Peter Strzok, disagreed, texting this: “Hey, if you haven’t closed that Flynn case yet, don’t do so yet.” End quote. So the Flynn case remained active. This was a good thing for Peter Strzok, but it was a bad thing for justice. It was a bad thing for the rule of law.

According to yesterday’s motion to dismiss the case against Lieutenant General Michael Flynn, it said this: Mr. Strzok immediately relayed the, quote, “serendipitously good” news to Lisa Page, special counsel at the FBI, remarking, quote, “our utter incompetence actually helps us.” That’s right. Their utter incompetence to close the case against Lieutenant General Michael Flynn was something to be serendipitously celebrated.

The scheme to manufacture a case against Michael Flynn continued. After President Trump entered office, the FBI’s partisan pursuit of General Flynn proceeded under Jim Comey’s FBI. Despite possessing a transcript of Flynn’s entire conversation, the FBI decided it was somehow necessary to go ask General Flynn what happened on the call, despite having a transcript in their possession. The only motive would have been to, quote, “get him to lie.”

They advised him he didn’t need a lawyer present. Imagine that: “You’re an American citizen. You don’t need a lawyer. We’re just coming in to have a chat.” They didn’t inform their superiors at the Department of Justice about their intent to interview Flynn, despite their own attorney at the FBI saying, “If we usually tell the White House, then I think we need to do what we normally do.” But they ignored the advice of FBI counsel, and they went in to interrogate Michael Flynn.

Acting Attorney General Sally Yates, no fan of President Trump, said she was “flabbergasted.” She was “dumbfounded” by the decision to not inform DOJ officials who, quote, “hit the roof.” This is all outlined in a legal document that you can find.

Additionally, when the FBI arrived at the White House, they did not even warn lawyer-less Flynn about the consequences for providing an inaccurate response. The interrogation of Michael Flynn was not an inquiry. Make no mistake: It was a trap. Even more troubling was the fact that after the interrogation of Flynn, former Deputy Director of the FBI Andy McCabe concluded that he, quote, “didn’t think Flynn was lying.” But the case against Flynn continued.

We were pleased to learn yesterday that the Justice Department moved to drop the case against General Michael Flynn. Though it took several years, it is encouraging to see that justice finally prevailed. As we move forward as a country, it’s important to take these revelations very seriously in order for Americans to have faith in our justice system.

If the top leadership of the FBI can target a three-star general who served this country for three decades, make no mistake, they can target you. It’s hard to believe that this happened in the United States of America.

General Michael Flynn’s life was forever changed. He had to sell his home. He faced financial ruin. His family was even threatened with prosecution. But despite all of that, here’s what Michael Flynn put out yesterday in his first reaction to the motion to dismiss. If we can play the video, let’s go ahead and play it.

I don’t think we have the video queued, but I encourage you all to go on General Twynn’s [sic] — Flynn’s Twitter feed, and what you’ll see is a really beautiful video of his grandson talking about how much he loves this country and how everyone deserves justice for all. And how commendable that is for General Flynn, at a time when he was so gravely wronged to say this: I still believe in this country. I still believe in America. I still believe in the principles that make this country the greatest on Earth.

And in the words of renowned political philosopher Baron de Montesquieu, “There is no greater tyranny than that which is perpetrated under the shield of law and in the name of justice.”

I hope the media will take these questions very seriously, will report the facts. There was heavy interest in the first iteration of Flynn news from many years ago that got four times the coverage that the exoneration of Michael Flynn got today. That was a report by Media Research Center. So these facts are important, and thank you very much for those who have taken interest in reporting.

And with that, I’ll take questions.

Q Thank you.

MS. MCENANY: Jim, you were so kind on the trip the other day to Honeywell, so you get the first one.

Q Thank you, Kayleigh. And congratulations on becoming Press Secretary.

MS. MCENANY: Thank you.

Q I wanted to ask you, putting aside the situation with Michael Flynn: Today, the unemployment rate hit the highest point since the Great Depression. What is the President’s plan to get this country out of this ditch?

MS. MCENANY: Yeah, you know, this President is the “jobs President.” This President got us to a place where we had the lowest [un]employment rate in the history of this country, historic lows for black Americans, Hispanic Americans, the disabled veterans.

As the President has noted, and I think this is right: We had to put a stop to the economy. It was a pause. This wasn’t some, you know, economic catastrophe that organically happened. It was decided upon by the President of the United States to stop the United States economy because we had to save 2.2 million lives — perhaps more, somewhere in that range — because American lives, that’s what mattered most.

And so this President, when faced with this very tough decision to put a pause on the hottest economy in modern history, said American lives matter most. And that’s what he did.

And I can tell you this: The President that got us to the hottest economy in modern history, he’s done it once, and he can do it again.

Q What’s the plan?

MS. MCENANY: We’re going to work with Congress. We’re going to come up with hopefully a phase four. We encourage the House to maybe reconvene soon. It’d be helpful if Nancy Pelosi was here.

But thus far, what we’ve done is the PPP, of course — Paycheck Protection Program — that has really kept a lot of employees on the payroll. Sixty million employees, roughly half of the workforce and private sector in this country, have been kept on payroll thanks to that measure.

But going forward, you know, principles like deregulation, principles like lowering taxes — the President has mentioned a payroll tax pause, which would be a great thing for the American people. There are a lot of proposals being entertained. I don’t want to get ahead of the President, but I can tell you —

Q Isn’t there a problem with — isn’t there a problem though — the President wants people to get back to work; he wants these governors to reopen their states. But if Americans aren’t comfortable going to restaurants and movie theaters, or the beach or whatever, how do you get this economy moving again? What’s the plan?

MS. MCENANY: I can tell you there’s a lot of pent-up demand in this country. There’s a lot of people who do want to go out to restaurants, who do want to go out to movies, who do want to go back to their jobs. We see it and we hear about it every day.

I don’t think that that’s a problem. I think people can trust that we have a President who wants to reopen and reopen safely. These are data-driven guidelines to reopening. The President has those in place, so there’s no reason to be concerned because we have a President who always looks at the data, as Dr. Fauci and Dr. Birx have repeatedly noted.

Zeke?

Q Kayleigh, there was a second confirmed case of COVID-19 here at the White House today. Apparently, a member of the Vice President’s staff. That’s two in two days in a building where people are being tested now — including the President and the Vice President — every day, and they’ve had their temperature checked for months here. Why should the average American, whose workplace doesn’t have access to these rapid tests, feel comfortable going to work if the White House isn’t even safe for people?

MS. MCENANY: Well, look, this individual — there is a member of the Vice President’s team who is positive for coronavirus. We have put in place the guidelines that our experts have — experts have put forward to keep this building safe, which means contact tracing. All of the recommended guidelines we have for businesses that have essential workers, we’re now putting in place here in the White House. So as America reopens safely, the White House is continuing to operate safely.

Yes, Jon.

Q Kayleigh, the President, of course, we saw him go down to the World War II Memorial with a group of seven American heroes, all in their 90s. Did he give any consideration to wearing a mask, given that his valet just tested positive and he’s with some of those in the most vulnerable population? Did he — did he consider wearing a mask while he was with these veterans?

MS. MCENANY: Well, this President is regularly tested. This President will make the decision as to whether to wear a mask or not.

I can tell you that those veterans are protected. They made the choice to come here because they’ve chosen to put their nation first. They wanted to be with their Commander-in-Chief on this momentous day. And it was their choice to come here, and I can tell you that the President always puts the safety of our veterans first and of the American people first.

Q Well, how much time — how much exposure has he had to his — his valet? Can you give us a sense of —

MS. MCENANY: I can just tell you that we’ve taken every single precaution to protect the President. The same guidelines that our experts have put in place: We clean the facility, we social distance, we keep people six feet away from one another. So we’ve done every single thing that Dr. Birx and Dr. Fauci have asked us to do. And I can assure the American people that their Commander-in-Chief is protected.

Yeah.

Q Thanks, Kayleigh. I want to ask you about the Gilead drug, remdesivir. Which government agency is in charge of distributing that drug? And is the White House satisfied with how that drug is being distributed around the country?

MS. MCENANY: Yeah, we’re — I actually just spoke with Dr. Birx about this. She is going to be working and consulting as to where this drug should go. She’s the person who’s constantly reviewing the numbers, constantly reviewing the data. I’m in task force with her every day, and she really has the best grasp as to how that should be distributed.

So she will be one of the chief consultants as to how that drug is distributed, which I would note, 1.5 million vials donated by Gilead. We’re so thankful for that. This drug is promising, and we want to get it to the American people and to the areas that need it most.

Yamiche?

Q Hi. Thanks so much for — and congratulations on the new gig.

MS. MCENANY: Thank you.

Q This is my first time seeing you at the podium. I have two quick questions. The first one is about, what’s the possibility of the federal government getting involved in the Ahmaud Arbery case, given that Georgia doesn’t have any hate crime laws? If it’s proven that these men chased and killed Ahmaud Arbery because he was an African American and they racially profiled him, would the Justice Department consider getting involved?

MS. MCENANY: Look, I — first, I want to say that my heart goes out to the family of Ahmaud. I can’t imagine what they’re going through right now. My heart breaks for this family. I know the President’s heart breaks. I’ve spoken to him about that.

And I can tell you we will follow the facts. Right now, as you know, it’s in the court in Georgia. It’s a state matter. But, absolutely, we will be following every detail. I’d refer you to DOJ. But as the facts merit, I’m certain that they’ll be following those facts.

And you had a second question?

Q The second question I have is: In 2015, shortly after
the President said that some Mexican immigrants were rapists and criminals, you said that that language was racist and hateful. Do you still believe that today?

MS. MCENANY: Well, I’m actually glad you asked that because for about the first four weeks of the election, I was watching CNN, and I was naively believing some of the headlines that I saw on CNN and —

Q I think you’re probably going to start reading headlines, but that’s fine. I just want to know if you also personally still believe that.

MS. MCENANY: I’m actually not — I’m actually not going to read the headlines. So I very quickly came around and supported the President. In fact, CNN hired me. I was on many eight-on-one panels where I proudly supported this President who I believe is one of the best presidents, if not the best president this country will ever have.

But I would encourage the individual who did that analysis of my past, rather than focusing on me, he really should be focused on some of the very guests CNN chose to have on their network. He should be focused on — I mean, my — over here, Jim — Jim Clapper who said, you know, 10 days before he privately told investigators there was no evidence of collusion, that Watergate pales in comparison to the Russia probe. I’d encourage them to look at Samantha Powers who’s privately saying: I’m not in possession of any evidence of collusion. Ambassador Rice: I don’t recall intelligence or evidence of any collusion. Former Attorney General Loretta Lynch: I do not recall that being briefed to me.

And for three years — two years — probably more than that — CNN ran with the collusion narrative. And if the American people are watching right now, you’re probably very confused as to some of the quotes I read, because those individuals were saying much different things publicly than they were saying privately. And I’m very grateful that those transcripts were released yesterday. And perhaps the KFile should do an analysis of that.

Yes, Ebony?

Q Respectfully, are you walking back those comments today at all?

MS. MCENANY: I support —

Q Or do you stand by those comments that you made?

MS. MCENANY: I support this President. There is no questioning that. I’m so honored to work for him.

And, Ebony, next question.

Q Thank you. On the Michael Flynn case, Kayleigh, documents released yesterday suggest members of the intelligence community tried to keep the case against Michael Flynn ongoing. I’m wondering if you think there should be an investigation and whether the administration is considering bringing charges against people like James Clapper and Peter Strzok.

MS. MCENANY: Yeah, I’d refer you to the DOJ on that, but I would say there were some very, very questionable actions that happened in this case, and I took you through a number of them. And I do think the American people deserve answers, but I leave it to the Justice Department as to how to get those answers.

Yes.

Q Thank you, Kayleigh. Has the President spoken to Michael Flynn since this news yesterday? And do you expect that he will visit the White House? Is that something that’s being planned?

MS. MCENANY: I’m not aware of any conversations that have taken place and not aware of any future plans that would regard Michael Flynn.

Q Could I ask one more? Larry Kudlow said today that negotiations on the next stimulus are at a lull right now. Given where the numbers are on unemployment, from your perspective, from the White House perspective, why is it at a lull right now?

MS. MCENANY: Well, look, I think Nancy Pelosi should explore coming back and having the House come back and having those discussions. We know the Senate is here. I think it’s important for us to move and look at a phase four. The President thinks so too.

So those negotiations will happen. But a big part of that is, you know, we need the House; we need Nancy Pelosi to come back from California and get to Washington, D.C., and to work for the American people.

Yeah.

Q Thank you. And congratulations on your new role.

MS. MCENANY: Thank you very much.

Q Yeah. Following up on Jim’s questions about getting back the economy — getting the economy started again, does the President see the CDC guidelines as an obstacle to getting the company — getting the country back up and running again? And if it does not see the CDC guidelines as an obstacle, why not release those guidelines to the public and also follow them as we move forward?

MS. MCENANY: So, I assume you’re talking about the guidelines that were widely reported about yesterday, about daycares —

Q Yes.

MS. MCENANY: Yeah, so I would ask you, you know, what’s the definition of CDC guidelines? Is it something that the CDC director has actually seen? I would endeavor to say yes. Is it something that a rogue CDC employee leaks to you guys? No, those aren’t CDC guidelines; those are guidelines in draft form that a rogue employee has given you for whatever personal reason they’ve decided to do that. Those guidelines are in the editing process.

We want the American people to get as much information as they can possibly have at this time. That’s why we have the phased reopening guidelines, the data-driven guidelines. Those CDC guidelines are going through an editing process. And when we have those, you guys will be the first to know.

How are we on time, Alyssa?

AIDE: (Inaudible.)

MS. MCENANY: Okay. What — sorry —

AIDE: Two to one. Two minutes to one.

MS. MCENANY: Oh, two minutes to one. I’m sorry to cut this short, but as you know, you guys were supposed to be, three minutes ago, with the President of the United States. So I will leave you guys with that.

I hope you have a wonderful weekend. And thanks so much everyone.

Q Why did you spend the first part of this briefing talking about Mike Flynn —

MS. MCENANY: Justice matters.

Q — when both the President and Vice President were exposed to coronavirus and we have historic unemployment?

END 12:58 P.M. EDT

National Economic Council Director Larry Kudlow appears on Fox Business to discuss today’s report on jobs from the Bureau of Labor and Statistics.

The estimated  unemployment rate jumped to 14.7 percent. Kudlow brings up a good point: allow people to take a tax deduction for COVID-19 expenses.