Good grief it’s taking the republicans f.o.r.e.v.e.r to explain to the American electorate what is going on behind the thoroughly corrupted political impeachment process.  In this interview John Ratcliffe finally explains why the “official impeachment inquiry” is not being run by the House Judiciary Committee that holds impeachment jurisdiction.

Speaker Pelosi, with forethought and planning by the Lawfare Alliance, is intentionally using non-jurisdictional committees because she is manipulating the process.  It’s the same reason why the House Intelligence, House Foreign Affairs and House Oversight committees cannot legally send out “Impeachment-based Subpoenas“; they have no impeachment jurisdiction.  {Go Deep} and {Go Deep} to understand why.

The “impeachment” subpoenas’ are not technically subpoenas because the basis for the requests, impeachment, is not within the jurisdiction of either committee.  So the committees are sending out demand letters, calling them subpoenas (media complies with the narrative), and hoping the electorate do not catch on to the scheme.  WATCH:

Speaker Pelosi, working through a carefully constructed political dynamic assembled by the hired staff from the Lawfare alliance, has sold her constituency on an impeachment process that structurally doesn’t exist.

Speaker Nancy Pelosi could never succeed in the scheme were she not assisted by a compliant media.  Pelosi is burning a constitutional process.

Speaker Pelosi does not want to engage the judicial branch, nor does she want to give the target (President Trump) the opportunity to engage the judicial branch, ie. court.

The judiciary would likely upend her House committee “official impeachment inquiry” scheme, just as D.C. District Court Chief Judge Beryl Howell recently did to Judiciary Committee Chairman Jerry Nadler for “gaming the system“.  Speaker Pelosi’s unilateral decree for an “official impeachment inquiry” without a House vote will not pass court review.

This is a carefully constructed subversion of the constitutional processes and procedures.

After the 2018 mid-terms, and in preparation for the “impeachment” strategy, House Intelligence Committee Chairman Adam Schiff and House Judiciary Committee Chairman Jerry Nadler hired Lawfare Group members to become committee staff. Chairman Schiff hired former SDNY U.S. Attorney Daniel Goldman (link), and Chairman Nadler hired  Obama Administration lawyer Norm Eisen and criminal defense attorney Barry Berke (link), all are within the Lawfare network.

As a result of the need to create the optics of something that doesn’t exist; and following the roadmap they outlined in 2018 [See Here and Here]; the Lawfare contractors within the committees’ needed to construct a penalty mechanism that benefits the impeachment agenda but avoids the court system.  As a result we see this:

Nice Lawfare trick huh?…

Several years ago the architect of Obamacare, Jonathan Gruber, admitted on camera the Democrats who were assembling healthcare legislation were “relying upon the stupidity of the American voter”….  Fast forward to House Speaker Nancy Pelosi in 2019 and her “official impeachment inquiry” by decree; she’s doing the exact same thing.

Speaker Pelosi, working through a carefully constructed political dynamic assembled by the hired staff from the Lawfare alliance, has sold her constituency on an impeachment process that structurally doesn’t exist.

Speaker Nancy Pelosi could never succeed in the scheme were she not assisted by a compliant media.

In the last week you’ve probably heard the media sell a narrative that Speaker Pelosi’s House Committee teams are sending out subpoenas to the State Department and White House.  However, has anyone actually looked for those “subpoenas”, or read the language of the written communication from those committees’?

Using the House Oversight Committee as the example (because that’s the one most citedand all of the letters are formatted identically), take a careful look at how they frame their undertaking.

As you read this, remember: these carefully chosen words come from the Lawfare Alliance:

(Source)

Notice the phrase “sent a letter conveying a subpoena“?

That statement is not the same as ‘sent a subpoena’; actually, it’s not even close – it is pure parseltongue.  You can call any car a Ferrari, but that doesn’t make it so.

Things get a little technical and wonky but essentially the term “subpoena” literally means “under penalty“.  A subpoena duces tecu, requires you to produce documents.  In this example a congressional subpoena literally, and only, means: a request for the production of documents with a penalty for non-compliance.  Read the letter HERE:

(Page 1 – screengrab, source pdf)

The House has no independent enforcement mechanism, so each time the House of Representative wants to send a subpoena with an enforcement bite – they need to go to the judicial branch (court system) for an enforceable order.  However, notice in these letters the enforcement mechanism is internal. It is a self-fulfilling ‘obstruction‘ scheme.

Speaker Pelosi does not want to engage the judicial branch, nor does she want to give the target (President Trump) the opportunity to engage the judicial branch, ie. court.

The judiciary would likely upend her House committee “official impeachment inquiry” scheme, just as D.C. District Court Chief Judge Beryl Howell recently did to Judiciary Committee Chairman Jerry Nadler for “gaming the system“.  Speaker Pelosi’s unilateral decree for an “official impeachment inquiry” without a House vote will not pass court review.

Remember when Democrats were recently delegitimizing the Supreme Court through attacks against Justice Kavanaugh?   Well, how likely is it that any legal test of this arbitrary “impeachment inquiry” is going to end up at SCOTUS?  Things making more sense now… I digress.

As a result of all the above these are political subpoenas, demand letters as weapons;  constructed for optimal political value, and framed to create obstruction articles of impeachment.

This is a carefully constructed subversion of the constitutional processes and procedures.

After the 2018 mid-terms, and in preparation for the “impeachment” strategy, House Intelligence Committee Chairman Adam Schiff and House Judiciary Committee Chairman Jerry Nadler hired Lawfare Group members to become committee staff. Chairman Schiff hired former SDNY U.S. Attorney Daniel Goldman (link), and Chairman Nadler hired  Obama Administration lawyer Norm Eisen and criminal defense attorney Barry Berke (link), all are within the Lawfare network.

As a result of the need to create the optics of something that doesn’t exist; and following the roadmap they outlined in 2018 [See Here and Here]; the Lawfare contractors within the committees’ needed to construct a penalty mechanism that benefits the impeachment agenda but avoids the court system.  As a result we see this:

Nice Lawfare trick huh?

The failure to comply with a non-official subpoena (essentially a letter); for documents relating to a fake “official impeachment inquiry” (Pelosi decree); that the House specifically never intends to enforce in any court (because they would fail); results in the House committee finding of “obstruction.” An enhancement for their impeachment articles.

Gee, where did the House Committees’ come up that that idea?

(LAWFARE Direct Link – DATE September 2018)

Anyone noticing a consistent pattern yet?

In 2018 we noted the significant House rule changes constructed by Nancy Pelosi for the 116th congress seemed specifically geared toward impeachment. {Go Deep}  That impeachment plan was made at the same time as the “Lawfare Obstruction Roadmap” was drawn up.

With the framework of the current effort, those changed rules are now being used to subvert historic processes and construct the articles of impeachment.  Without a vote to initiate an impeachment inquiry, the articles of impeachment can now be drawn up in committee without any participation by the minority; and without any input from the executive branch. This was always the plan visible in Pelosi’s House rules.

These letters from congress, they are calling ‘subpoenas’, are specifically designed to avoid the courts because of the unilateral nature of the investigations which underpin their content.  Quite a scheme:

• The House Committee impeachment investigations are structured around unilateral rule changes made by Pelosi’s scheme team in 2018 designed to block republicans.
• In 2019 Speaker Pelosi then launches a unilateral “official impeachment inquiry” by decree.  Again designed to block republicans.
• Then Pelosi combines the unilateral rule changes with unilateral committee assignments, and designs an obstruction path within a unilateral investigation, again completely carving out republicans.

There will likely be more articles other than just “obstruction of justice” (Muh Russia) and “corruption of office” (Muh Ukraine), but those two are easily visible.  Emoluments may also play a role.

Once the committees’ have assembled their evidence, assuming the public becomes aware of the partisan construct, Pelosi will likely initiate the full House vote to proceed with the assembly of articles of impeachment.  However, the committees’ will have already done the investigative work without republican involvement, so the full House vote will essentially be a moot point.

You are detained and questioned extensively. You answer all the questions. At the conclusion of your inquisition you are read your rights. Your attorney shows up; questioning stops.  A week later you are indicted and the material evidence against you is your statements.  This is what Pelosi/Lawfare are constructing. It doesn’t matter that the trial judge will throw it out, what mattered was the indictment.

This is why there is such a massive narrative push by Pelosi, committee leaders and their media allies right now… they need to assemble evidence while republicans remain locked out of the process and committee staff (hired Lawfare) construct the articles.  The goal is impeachment.  They achieve that goal via a majority House vote on any individual article.

The ‘Resistance‘ and ‘Deep State‘ facilitators (writ large) are all-in on this impeachment effort.  Additionally, impeachment as an offense is their best defense to anything being investigated by U.S. Attorney John Durham, Attorney General Bill Barr and DOJ-IG Michael Horowitz.

Yes, this entire group is also racing the clock. They need the Trump indictment, aka ‘impeachment‘, to construct a retaliation narrative that protects them -all of them- from any downstream consequences of Barr, Durham or, to a lesser extent, Horowitz.

References:

Pelosi Rule Changes

Senator Mitt Romney (U-Self), the former presidential candidate of ‘lightly held stances’, while holding a personal financial interest in status-quo China, once again puts himself on the outside of the electorate.  Apparently President Trump has had enough:

Mitt “pompous ass” Romney, is exactly correct.

Rudy Giuliani appears on Fox News to discuss the overall Ukraine issue.  Giuliani emphasizes that his investigation was directed toward conduct in 2016, *not* directed toward anything related to the 2020 election.  Mr. Giuliani is a man on a mission.

Earlier today President Trump delivered remarks at a White House Young Black Leadership Summit.  [Video and Transcript below]

.

[Transcript] – THE PRESIDENT: Boy, oh boy. This is a group. So — (applause). So, I’ve been doing this for a long time. That is the loudest I’ve ever heard anything in this room. (Applause.) You just broke the record. Unbelievable.

Well, I want to thank you all. And I have a lot of friends, but — (applause) — and this is a place. 1799 it was built. 1799. Started off with number six — John Adams, President. And so, it’s a long time. It’s the White House, and we love it, and it’s an honor to have you.

But you really did — you broke the sound barrier. I’ve never heard that. I’ve never heard it quite like that, and I appreciate it. We love you. We love you.

AUDIENCE MEMBER: We love you!

THE PRESIDENT: Thank you. (Applause.) Thank you. And I’m honored to welcome everybody and these incredibly talented and unbelievable, patriotic, young American leaders. You’re going to be the leaders.

Somebody — I would be almost willing to bet, maybe even willing to bet — somebody in that audience, right here, right in front of me, is going to be standing here someday. I think so. (Applause.) (Inaudible.) You’ve got a good shot. You’re going to have a good shot. You’ve done incredible work to get to this position, and I have tremendous respect for it.

We’re glad to be joined by our terrific Vice President, Mike Pence. (Applause.) And many of our Cabinet members are here. They wanted to be here. I told a couple of them, “Don’t have to. Don’t worry about it. What the heck. These are my friends.” They said, “No, we want to be here.” (Applause.) So we have a lot of our Cabinet members here.

And to every young person: You represent America’s future. You are the best and the brightest, the bravest and boldest, and someday you are going to be setting records like nobody before. I’m telling you, I know it. I know where’s it’s at. I know where energy is, and you have the energy like very few people have the energy. So I just want to tell you: Get out there. Prove me right, please. Okay? (Applause.) Prove me right. I have no doubt you will.

Each of you has come to Washington for the Black Leadership Summit because you have — (applause) — what it takes to achieve real change on your campuses and in your communities, and that’s what you’ve been doing, and that’s actually why you’re here.

You speak out for the values and principles that have made America the most exceptional nation anywhere on Earth. And I will say this today: It’s greater than it ever was before — our military, our economy. (Applause.) We have the greatest economy in the world. We have the greatest economy we’ve ever had. Tremendous numbers just came out today. You heard that.

But you stand up for the oppressive forces — and you do. You stand right up to those forces in our country that demand conformity and control. You refuse to be censored, you refuse to be silenced, and you will never back down. (Applause.) And don’t. Don’t ever back down.

You’re the champions for free thought and free speech. And I especially want to thank a friend of mine who is — I mean, first of all, you think he’s like 50, but he’s about 25 or something like that. (Laughter.) He’s a young guy. I can’t — I can’t even imagine being so successful at such a young age. What he’s done in so many ways — and, really, more importantly, letting young people know that they have a voice. Charlie Kirk, from Turning Point U.S.A. (Applause.)

Charlie, you’ve done a fantastic job. Fastest-growing organization of thought — of thought — in the country. He is something. Thank you very much, Charlie. I appreciate your being here.

And we’re also joined by a friend of mine — just got married — (applause) — just got married. And Candace Owens — I watched her, and I saw her coming. I said — you know, I’m pretty good at star power. I look, and I say, “That’s a star.” (Laughter.) Every once in a while, I’ll see somebody. You know, it happens about once every five years. That’s all it is. But I’ll be watching. I saw Candace probably three, four years ago. How long would it be, Charlie? Four? Maybe four. I saw this woman on television. I said, “Man, I don’t want to mess with her. She’s tough. She’s tough.”

Now, I’m not allowed to say it — you know that. I’m not allowed to say it anymore, but she’s also beautiful. So, I’ll say that, too. (Applause.) Okay?

It’s true. Under the #MeToo generation, we’re not allowed to say it. So, all of you young, brilliant guys: Never ever call a woman beautiful, please. (Laughter.) You’re not allowed to do it. And I’ve kept doing it, and I’ve never been told by that woman never to do it. Just say, “Thank you, sir.” (Laughter.)

Candace, would you come up here, and say a few words? Do you mind? Come. (Applause.) Thank you, Candace. Thank you.

MS. OWENS: You know what? I was thinking: Every single President that comes into office, after two years, they look so much older. He seems to be the only President that’s getting younger. (Applause.) Is he — I mean, like, he has somehow found a fountain of youth. I think he gets up out of bed — it’s the fight. He loves the fight. He really does. (Applause.)

THE PRESIDENT: We have no choice.

MS. OWENS: We are — we are — we are so blessed. And, listen, let me say this: The media — the audacity of them to think that they’re going to impeach our President. (Applause.)

AUDIENCE: Booo —

MS. OWENS: No. It’s not happening. It’s absolutely not happening. Not under our watch. We need to make sure we fight for this man — the one man who is standing up for Black America, we are going to fight for, guys. We have to keep it going. (Applause.)

THE PRESIDENT: Thank you, Candace. Thank you. That’s so nice. Outstanding person. She’s another one. You’re going to have to compete with her, too, for this position, I suspect. (Laughter.) Thank you very much.

You know, it’s sort of interesting. It’s like: Do we have a choice? We have to fight, right? We have to fight. We have to fight for everything, whether we like it or not.

Another man who has been so incredible — Ja’Ron Smith. Where is Ja’Ron? Is he around here? Ja’Ron Smith. (Applause.) Man, have you done a job. You’ve done such a great job, Ja’Ron. At least come up and shake my hand, will you, please? (Applause.) Come here, Ja’Ron.

You know, he works with us, and he’s actually not — I always say he’s so elegant and so quiet and so nice. They say, “You don’t know the real Ja’Ron.” So I want to see that. (Laughter.) But what he does and the job he’s done on outreach and so many other aspects of our lives is incredible. I want to thank you, Ja’Ron. Thank you very much. (Applause.) I want to thank you for that. I appreciate it. Thank you.

And Ja’Ron knows what I’m about to do because — a man who I met on Twitter, or, as we would say, “social media”; he is some piece of work, this guy — he was hitting Debra Messing like she never got hit before. (Laughter.) This crazy Debra Messing started messing with us. And all of a sudden, I see this man on Twitter, and I see him all over. And he was hitting her and I never saw anything like it. (Laughter.) I felt so sorry for her.

And then, I look and I say, “Who is this guy?” His name is Terrence Williams. I look — (applause) — and I look and I said, “Well, you know, the way you look…” And the first thing I look is, how many followers does he have? And he had like 700,000 followers. I said, “Whoa.”

You know, oftentimes I’ll be impressed by somebody. I’ll look and they have three followers, they say. (Laughter.) I say, “We have to wait for him or her.” But this guy has a following like very few people. And I want to just thank you because I’m a fan of yours, also. You’re a very successful guy. Say a few words. Please.

MR. WILLIAMS: Thank you, President Trump. Thank you. Yeah, let me — yeah, this is a little too tall for me. (Applause.)

First of all, I just want to say I love President Donald J. Trump. (Applause.) The media is attacking him. But when they attack him, they are attacking us. (Applause.) Because he is out here fighting for us. And they are harassing you, Mr. President, so they are harassing me. (Applause.)

And I want to say one more thing here. A while back, President Trump said, when he was talking to the black community, “If you vote for me, what do you have to lose?” Because the do-nothing Democrats have done nothing for the black community. 2020 is around the corner and we have a lot to lose now because President Donald J. Trump has done so much for the black community. Thank you, President Trump. (Applause.)

THE PRESIDENT: Thank you.

He is something. And he’s a talented, talented guy. And when he started talking, I wasn’t — man, I watched it once. I watched it twice. And then I called the First Lady over. I say, “What do you think of this guy?” (Laughter.) Thank you very much, Terrence. We appreciate it a lot.

We come together at a time of extraordinary opportunity for our nation. Thanks to our pro-American agenda, the economy is booming, wages are rising, and poverty is plummeting. We have the best economy we’ve ever had, and believe me, we’re just getting started. We have such potential. Such potential.

Last month, the unemployment rate dropped to the lowest level in over 51 years — (applause) — 3.5 percent. People didn’t think they were going to see that a couple of years ago. If I would’ve said that, the fake news would’ve said, “This guy is exaggerating.” (Laughter.)

Wages are up by almost 3 percent in the last three years. When I was campaigning three years ago, and people were making less and less and less — they were making less three years ago. You go back 20 years from then, they used to make more money with one job than they made with two or three jobs. And now, for the first time in many, many years, wages are rising again. (Applause.)

The unemployment rate for African Americans is at the lowest it’s ever been in the history of our country. (Applause.)

And African American youth unemployment — young, African American talented people recently reached the lowest rate ever recorded. (Applause.) So how do we lose that debate? We’ll be up and somebody will say, “I’m going to do this.” I say, “Folks, how old is your country?” African American — the best numbers you’ve ever, ever had. And I could go into plenty of other numbers. For the first time ever, as an example, the most new hires of prime working age are minorities and women. (Applause.) The African American poverty rate has reached its lowest level in the history of our country, so that’s good. (Applause.)

And they’re working hard, they’re finding jobs and they’re getting good jobs. And if you don’t like that job, you can get another one because you have a lot of choice. It’s like the military; we got them Choice in the VA. They can go find another doctor. They can go out — you know, by the way, just because a lot of people are vets — the vets were treated horribly. You don’t hear that anymore. You don’t hear it.

Now, they’ll go out and find some vet somewhere in this country that isn’t happy. And that person will become a star overnight, right? (Laughter.) But you don’t hear it anymore.

But we did a thing called Choice. And that’s where people were waiting — our great veterans were waiting for two days, five days, five weeks, months to get a doctor. Now they don’t have to wait at all. They go outside, they get a good doctor of their choice, and the doctor gives us a bill, we pay the bill.

And you know, the least important thing is it actually costs us less. That’s the least important. The most important thing is we take care of our vets. Our vets were dying waiting to see a doctor. They’d go in — think of this. I mean, many of you, you go see a doctor. It’s not that big a deal. They would go see a doctor and they’d be waiting on line for weeks. And they’d be sick, but not bad.

By the time they saw the doctor, they’d be terminally ill. And we don’t do that anymore.

So it’s a big thing. They’ve been trying to get this approved by — for over, I guess, Mike, over 45 years, and we got it done. We’re good at getting things done. And how much sense does it make? So, it’s good. (Applause.)

So you have Choice, also. You have choice in your jobs. You don’t like your job, you go out. We have a great economy. You go out, get another one. And it’s incredible how well you’re doing.

Our agenda is lifting up citizens of every background, race, religion, color, and creed. But while we are fighting every day to build up our nation, the far-left only wants to wreck, ruin, and destroy our nation.

AUDIENCE: Booo —

THE PRESIDENT: And you know better than anybody: For the last three years, Democrat lawmakers, their deep-state cronies, the fake news media, they’ve been colluding in their effort to overturn the presidential election — 63 million people voted — and to nullify the votes of the American people. And many African American people voted for Trump even then. Now they like me more, because I said I was going to do it and now I did it. So you better vote. (Applause.) I said I was going to do it. I said, “I’m going to do it.”

AUDIENCE: Four more years! Four more years! Four more years!

THE PRESIDENT: But you remember, I’d make speeches and I’d go through a list. I’d be talking about the African American community and I’d go through a list of worst poverty levels ever, worst crime ever, worst schools ever, worst this. I’d go through 10 things. I’d read off from a list.

And at one big rally — I had 25,000 people — I said, “Go with me. What the hell do you have to lose?” (Applause.) Remember that, Candace? I said, “What do you have to lose? You’re doing the worst in every category. You’re getting just — it’s terrible. What the hell do you have to lose?”

And I’ll never forget, I got off stage and my people came: “Sir, that wasn’t very nice.” I said, “No, it’s true.” What do they have to lose? And you went with me, and I did get a good vote, I have to say. You went with me, and now you have the best employment numbers you’ve ever had, the best numbers, the best poverty numbers. So, it’s good. (Applause.)

But the radical Democrats are willing to do anything to smear anyone and to lie about everything in their craven quest for power and money and other things, I guess. (Laughter.) I don’t want to tell you what those other things are, but they’re not good. Although, maybe when the cameras shut off, we’ll talk. (Laughter.)

They’re trying to steal your vote. They’re trying to steal your voice and steal your country. They’re trying to steal your country. And they don’t have what it takes. “Shifty Schiff.” How about “Shifty Schiff”?

AUDIENCE: Booo —

THE PRESIDENT: He got four Pinnochios today in the Washington Post. He lies like a son of a gun. He’s been lying for three years. (Laughter.)

But we will never let that happen, where they take away your country. We will uphold the sacred principle of government by and for the people. That’s you. The corrupt forces in Washington — and they are corrupt — and that includes the media, because large parts of the media — not all of it. You have some great journalists, reporters. But large portions of the media are corrupt, perpetrating these hoaxes like never before.

The very same people who have made a living selling out American workers to foreign countries. They were closing the factories. You’re losing your jobs. They leave our country, they make the product, they sell the product in. No tax, no nothing. So we ended up with empty factories and no jobs, by the thousands, by the tens of thousands, and jobs by the millions.

These are the same bought and paid-for politicians who let special interests write the laws, who push trade policies to enrich foreign nations, and who beg far-left judges to rewrite the Constitution of the United States to impose their their own extreme ideology.

No one in America has been hurt more as a result of the Democrats’ corrupt leadership and socialist policies than our nation’s African American communities. It’s true. That’s true. It’s true. For a hundred years — for a hundred years, African Americans have gone with the Democrats. Has it worked?

AUDIENCE: No!

THE PRESIDENT: Has it worked? For — actually, I guess, Candace, it’s even more — but a hundred years. And you look at what’s going on in the cities run by these crazy left Democrats, and what’s going on is not good.

My administration is fighting with everyone, and all our heart — (laughter) — to reverse the pain inflicted by Democrat leaders and to deliver hope and opportunity and prosperity for all Americans, but for African American communities all throughout our land.

Together, we will express the corruption, we will defeat the socialists, we will defraud. And I tell you what: We will do what we have to do, but we will stop defrauding all of the people in our country, because they’ve defrauded the people in our country. We’ll defend democracy. And, yes, we will drain the swap. But that’s what we’re doing. (Applause.)

African Americans built this nation — (applause) — you built this nation. You know, you’re just starting to get real credit for that, okay? I don’t know if you know that. You’re just starting to get — you built the nation. We all built it. But you were such a massive part of it — bigger than you were given credit for. Does that make sense? Right? (Applause.) But with Candace around and Terrence, that’s not going to happen for long. (Laughs.)

But through generations of blood, sweat, and tears and — you deserve a government that defends your interests, protects your families, and cares for our own citizens first. (Applause.)

You know, at the border, where they want the open policies — they want open borders. They don’t want walls. They actually do want walls, but because I want it — you know, I know how I can get the wall. If I announce tomorrow, “I don’t want a wall,” the Democrats would come out in favor of the wall. (Laughter.) I should’ve thought of that two years ago. But the wall is being built. It would’ve been a lot easier. “We don’t want the wall.” “We want the wall.” I say, “All right, go ahead and build.” (Laughter.)

Our philosophy is grounded in the sacred bonds of love and loyalty that unite all Americans. And we really have been united. It’s been an incredible thing. A lot of great things have been happening. You don’t necessarily see it at the top of government, where the hatred is tremendous — the hatred toward us. And a lot of it is because of the success. We’re having such success. We’re showing them what’s going on — when you look at your unemployment numbers, how great they are. The best in history. You look at your employment numbers. You look at the poverty numbers. You look at all of the things that have been so beneficial, it’s driving them crazy, because they never produced numbers like that. And they’re losing African American votes, and they can’t do that. They just can’t do that. They haven’t done anything for you. They haven’t done anything. A hundred years — they haven’t done anything.

At long last, you have a government that puts Americans first, puts you first, puts your families and your communities first.

We’re adopting “Buy American” trade policies to stand up for our workers. Our tax and regulatory reforms are stopping the outsourcing of jobs, where they outsource all your jobs to other countries, and keeping businesses in America where they belong. And keep your jobs where your jobs belong. We’re fighting every day to secure our nation’s borders and to achieve an immigration system that prioritizes American families, wage-earners, taxpayers, and people that can help you and can help our country.

To keep our cities safe, we’re supporting the brave men and women of ICE, and Border Patrol, and law enforcement. (Applause.) And you’d be amazed at how many African American people come up, and they have people living near them that are brutal killers. They’re killers. But you’re tough; you fight back. But sometimes you don’t win those fights, because these guys are tough, too. They shouldn’t be in our country. And it’s really amazing to see what some of our law enforcement does and how much they love you. And that’s the fact. That’s the fact. And we’re lucky to have them.

To revitalize distressed neighborhoods, we created something that I’m very proud of. Tim Scott, South Carolina. (Applause.) You know Tim? (Applause.) Tim Scott has to get a lot of credit. He came to me with Jared, and he said, “So, we’d like to do Opportunity Zones.” I said, “What’s that?” But once he told me, I said, “Maybe that would work.”

And I think, Jared, it’s one of the great — it’s one of the great unknowns of the successes that we have. Thousands and thousands of zones in inner cities and poor neighborhoods. Tremendous investments going in. Tremendous jobs are happening. Revitalization is happening. It’s been incredible for the African American community. I don’t think there’s ever been anything. It’s early yet. It’s a year and a half. But, Ja’Ron, I don’t think we’ve ever had anything quite like it. And people don’t like writing about it because they don’t want to give the Trump administration credit. But I’m used to that. I’m used to it. You got to get used to it.

You know who knows, though? The people know. The people know. But because no —

AUDIENCE MEMBER: (Inaudible.)

THE PRESIDENT: (Laughs.) Thank you. (Laughter.)

Because, really, no American community is going to be left behind. Any community.

To help former prisoners get a second chance at life — (applause) — we passed groundbreaking — and this is with liberals and conservatives — some of the most conservative people in the Republican Party were so in favor of it. Senator Lee — Mike Lee, of Utah, great guy. Senator Grassley, great guy — Iowa. So many people.

Criminal justice reform. Everybody said it couldn’t be done. And a group came to my office, “Sir, please. Please, would you help us?” These were liberal people. And I said, “I will.” Van Jones was one. Nice guy. I wouldn’t say treats me too good, but that’s okay. (Laughter.) Van Jones. And he said, “Sir, we need your help. We can’t get five senators. We can’t get this, we can’t get that. We need your help. We need your help. Please, sir, help me! Please, help me!” (Laughter.)

I said, “I can get you those five senators.” And I called five or six or seven, to get the five. Sometimes you have to call a little more than the five if you want to get the five, right? You’ll learn. (Laughter.) A couple said, “Could I take a pass on this, sir?” But I got five people. Right, Jared? And we got the vote, and people were shocked. And nobody else could’ve done it.

And they’ve been trying to change this for the African American community, for the Hispanic community, for other communities, but, really, the African American and Hispanic communities, by far, benefitted the most. And they’ve been trying to do this for decades. It started with the Clintons. It was not good. Right? Remember when she ran and she —

AUDIENCE: Booo —

THE PRESIDENT: No, remember when she ran and she had that young African American woman who was tough? Maybe it was Candace. Could that have been you, Candace? (Laughter.) But — no, I don’t think so.

But I remember how she was so angry at Hillary Clinton. But they passed that. And it was horrible for the black community, for a lot of communities, but in particular black and Hispanic and some others. And I said to a senator, “It’s a great thing. We got to do it.” People are in jail for 40, 50, 60 years for a crime that isn’t even a crime today.

AUDIENCE MEMBER: Right!

THE PRESIDENT: Right? Isn’t that right?

AUDIENCE: Yes!

THE PRESIDENT: Our friend, Jared — we have number of them, but we helped a couple of our friends — a lot of our friends now. We pardoned certain people. Who you would say, Ja’Ron? Who would you say in particular? Go ahead. Give me a couple of names, because we had — you know, who I’m talking about? Alice. Right?

PARTICIPANT: (Inaudible.)

THE PRESIDENT: We had a woman — Alice Johnson. We had a woman, Alice Johnson, who was this lovely woman, and she was in for about 22 years already. I mean, she’s served 22 years, and I think she had another 25 or 26 to go for making a phone call. And, look, she admits she did wrong. But, today, it would be a slightly different — like, maybe not enough, to be honest with you. But it would be very different.

So she was in and she was a wonderful woman, and Kanye West came and Kim came, and they said, “President, could you do this?” I said, “Do what?” (Laughter.) “Do what? What are you talking?” “A woman has been in jail for 22 years. She’s got another 28 to serve, I think. Something like that.” Think of that. And she’s got another 28 to serve and she’s a great woman and she’s a wonderful woman.

And I — I get along with Kanye for a long time. You saw the way he — when he was with the White House; he puts the hat on. (Laughter.) I think for one day I went up through the polls like through the roof. I’ll tell you. (Laughter.) He is — with the African American community, they like Kanye and they like Kim Kardashian.

And we pardoned her and we worked it so that she was going to be able to get out — a form of a pardon, where she could get out. And she came out. And I’ll never forget the scene: She comes out of this big prison — mean, mean prison. Not too many of them are nice, right? (Laughter.) But she comes out through the doors, and there are her children, but her children are now very grown. Big strong guys, beautiful women, beautiful — just a big family. And they just embraced. They just embraced. And it was on television all over. And the love, it was just incredible to see. And the tears — and they were just like one. It was incredible to watch.

And I said, “We have to do it with others.” And you called Alice, I know that, Ja’Ron and Jared.

AUDIENCE MEMBER: (Inaudible.)

THE PRESIDENT: Come on. Give — give those names. They’re great —

AUDIENCE MEMBER: So you got (inaudible).

THE PRESIDENT: Right.

AUDIENCE MEMBER: You have Brenda (inaudible).

THE PRESIDENT: Right, Brenda.

AUDIENCE MEMBER: You have, Matthew as well.

THE PRESIDENT: Right.

AUDIENCE MEMBER: You got Keith (inaudible).

THE PRESIDENT: Right.

AUDIENCE MEMBER: But also, prosecutors are now sending them letter to try to overturn what you’ve done.

THE PRESIDENT: That’s right. The prosecutors are doing things that they weren’t doing before, right? That’s right. Thank you very much. That’s great. Boy, that was a — you have a good memory. That’s very good. (Laughter.) Huh, because you work with it, right? It’s from the heart. When it’s from the heart you always remember. That’s great.

And we have many others. And we’re going — like we’ll going to Alice, and we’ll say, “Alice, who knows better…” because you can’t let everybody out because, frankly, some are going to be there and they deserve to be there.

But we say, “Alice, who else do you think in that prison — you grew up, you were there for so long — 22 years — who else do you know that should be let out?” And she gave us some names. And not even that many names, but she gave us four, five names. And I guarantee you those are great people. They’ve been in there also for many, many years. And they got to be friendly. And afterwards — she’s smart. After all those years, she knows the good. And I have no doubt that it will work out. And we’re getting them out now. We’re in the process of getting them out to be with their families. (Applause.) So it’s great. It’s great. It’s been a great thing.

But I did want to say — so Van Jones was on about two weeks ago and he came to me and — I’m telling you, he was so nice. He was sitting right there when I was doing it. And I said, “Thank you, Van Jones. Thank you.” This one, this one, that one, that one. And that was it. And he came up to me, thanked me. And that was it.

Then, about three weeks ago, I saw him on television. I don’t watch his show too much, neither do too many. (Laughter.) But I’m watching him and he gets up and he goes, “I want to thank a number of people, because we did something this year that was undoable. They said it couldn’t be done. We passed criminal justice reform.” Okay? (Applause.) Van Jones said it. “And I want to thank Reverend Al Sharpton.” Well, he wasn’t nowhere. He was nowhere to be found.

AUDIENCE: Booo —

THE PRESIDENT: Just so we know, I’ve known him for a long time. He used to love me. We used to go to fights together with Don King. Don King is a friend of mine. Don King endorsed me. And Don Kin and Al Sharpton get along. We used to go to fights together, and he liked me until I ran and succeeded in politics. Then it wasn’t to his benefit.

But, look, Al is a con man. We all know that. (Applause.) Just a con man. He’s a con man. And he scared NBC into giving him a show. You know, they don’t want to have any trouble. But he’s a — just a, sort of a third-rate con guy. (Laughter.)

But here’s Van Jones. (Laughter.) Here’s Van Jones. Van Jones: “I want to thank Al Sharpton. I want to thank all of these people.” He’s naming people I never heard of. The only one he didn’t mention was me.

And then it got worse. You ready? Candace, listen to this. (Laughter.) Terrence, are you listening? (Laughter.)

So he named these people — a lot of people — standing at the end of a show. “I want to thank — because this was the greatest year we’ve ever had. We got criminal justice reform. I want to thank this one and that one and that one and that one.” I never heard of any of them. And I kept waiting for my name. (Laughter.)

I said, “Darling, come over here. I’m going to have a great, really, little name mention.” (Laughter.) “Yes, darling.” The First Lady — how good is the First Lady? So she came over. (Applause.) And I kept waiting, and I kept waiting, and then he named a lot of people. That was the end. I said — I was a little embarrassed in front of my wife. I said, “He didn’t name me. I’m the one that did it.” (Laughter.)

I called up Jared. Right, Jared? I said, “What the hell is this?” But before that — (laughter) — he did have one other thing to say. This was three weeks ago. He said, “And I have one thing to say that we have to do. We must defeat this President.”

AUDIENCE: Booo —

THE PRESIDENT: “We have to defeat President Trump. And we have to work 24 hours a day to defeat President Donald Trump.”

And I called Jared, and I said, “That’s terrible.” Right? Is that a true story? And then he spoke to Jared and he apologized, didn’t he? He apologized. But I don’t accept those apologies, you know? (Applause.)

THE PRESIDENT: All right. Should we get back onto script, okay?

AUDIENCE: No!

THE PRESIDENT: “No.” They say, “No.” This is more inter- — they don’t want to go back onto — this is much more interesting. We love you folks, okay? We love you. (Applause.)

Van Jones. Van Jones, he’s another beauty. Thank you very much, Van, for the wonderful acknowledgment. I appreciate it. (Laughter.)

To give every American child the best chance to reach the American Dream, we are fighting for school choice. Very important. (Applause.)

Sadly, Democrat lawmakers care more about catering to lobbyists and powerful teachers’ unions than they do about improving our schools for our children. And Democrats care more about illegal immigrants than about their own African American constituents. It’s true. (Applause.) They want to give healthcare to people that just walked into the country. And for you, they don’t care. The whole thing is crazy. These people have gone absolutely nuts.

While we’re fighting for the American way of life, the hard left and the radical left is working to trample the rule of law, erode individual liberty, and exert a far-reaching control over our lives. Left-wing censors have launched an all-out campaign against free speech. That is why they are trying to silence, de-platform, cancel, punish all of the proud conservative voters, all of the proud African American voices that know what’s happening and know how to become big, big, successful people, help other people. They want to silence you.

But we know the patriots in this room will never be intimidated. I know that. (Applause.) I know that.

So here, with us today, is Kearyn Bolin, President of the Texas State University — that’s a big deal — Turning Point USA Chapter, who has bravely defended the right to free speech. And, Kearyn, would you please come up and say a few words? Please. Thank you. (Applause.) I thought so. I love her hair. (Laughter.) You look great. That’s beautiful.

MS. BOLIN: So, last year at my college campus, they did try to ban Turning Point from our campus. So we fought strong and we prevailed. The piece of legislation was completely unconstitutional, and we are still fighting strong on our campus. So we’re still there.

I just want to thank Donald Trump for everything you have done for us. We are so incredibly honored to be here. And you’ve done so much for this country, and thank you so much.

I’d also like to thank Turning Point for giving me the platform and the confidence to fight for a right for freedom of speech. (Applause.)

It hasn’t been easy and it will not be easy, but being a part of Turning Point and being able to see all of you accomplish so many of your goals and to help fight for the freedom of speech, it’s honestly amazing and it gives me so much hope.

Our generation is playing a vital role in keeping our First Amendment rights, and we are going to continue to keep up that fight.

So all of you on your campuses or in high school — I know a lot of you are in high school — continue to fight for your right for freedom of speech because you know where you stand, and everyone else can know where you stand too. So just keep up that fight. (Applause.)

THE PRESIDENT: Thank you. Thank you, Kearyn.

(Gives kiss on the cheek.)

AUDIENCE: Aww! (Applause.)

THE PRESIDENT: Thank you very much, Kearyn. (Laughter.) I got to get the other cheek.

(Gives kiss on the cheek.) Now I feel better. (Applause.)

You’ve done a fantastic job. I appreciate it.

In order to protect the rights of our students, I signed an executive order making clear that public colleges and universities shutting down free speech will risk losing all of the billions and billions of dollars that we give them. (Applause.)

So we’ll shut down their federal taxpayer dollars that go to them. And then they shut down speech. And they just choose whoever it is. They’ll let somebody speak, they’ll tell other people you can’t speak, and then we’re supposed to give them, individually, hundreds of millions of dollars. It doesn’t work that way anymore.

I’ve also tasked my administration to explore every possible solution to stop social media giants from restricting your rights to speak your mind. And, Candace, you had a problem with that, I know. And other people have had a problem. Some people in this room have had a problem. Terrence, have you had a problem with it? Huh? Terrence has had a problem. It’s incredible. It’s incredible. Yeah, no, a lot of people have. But not the other side of the world. The other side doesn’t have that problem. Very rarely do they have it.

We must preserve the fundamental American rights that generations of Americans have sacrificed everything to secure.

With us this afternoon is Ben Okereke. That’s a great name. I love that name. When Ben was 14 years old, he legally immigrated to the United States after suffering many hardships in Cameroon, which I hear is a beautiful, beautiful place. Cameroon.

(Audience member cheers.)

THE PRESIDENT: Oh. Wow. (Applause.) One person from Cameroon. (Laughter.)

To give back to our country, he joined the United States Army and honorably served for four years — (applause) — as a very talented field artillery specialist. A lot of talent, they say.

Ben, we salute your noble service. And please say a few words. Ben. (Applause.) Please. All yours.

MR. OKEREKE: Thank you. Thank you, Mr. President. Thank you, Mr. Vice President. And thank you, Charlie Kirk.

First of all, Mr. President, we would like to thank you for everything that you’ve done for the African American community so far. We thank you for criminal justice reform. We thank you for the lowest black unemployment rate in this country, sir. (Applause.)

And finally, most importantly, sir, thank you for saving America and thank you.

AUDIENCE: Aww!

AUDIENCE MEMBER: It’s all right!

(Applause.)

MR. OKEREKE: Thank you. Thank you.

Finally, sir, thank you for taking down the fake news media, sir. (Applause.)

Finally, we want you to build a wall, sir. (Laughter.) Frankly, because we don’t oppose immigration, but we oppose — but we oppose illegal immigration. So we want you to come to this country legally, if you’re going to come to this country. (Applause.) Thank you.

THE PRESIDENT: Thank you, Ben.

MR. OKEREKE: Yes, sir.

THE PRESIDENT: Thank you, Ben. And that’s from the heart. That’s from the heart. That’s what it’s all about.

The young leaders in this room remind us that true power in our nation is not found in government or hallways or anywhere; it’s found not in the media boardrooms. It really is where the strength is. It’s in our people. It’s in your hearts. It’s in your courage, your spirit, your faith, and your pride.

Together, we will defend the benefits and the beliefs that you want, and you have, and you’re entitled to; the traditions and God-given freedoms that make our country the greatest in the world — and even, I think we can say, right now, the greatest in the history of the world. Just like your unemployment numbers — greatest in history. That’s the greatest in history, also.

You are my friends. I’m never going to forget you. You’ve been incredible. You’ve been incredible. Whether it’s Ja’Ron — the job you do; or Charlie, I appreciate it; or Terrence; or Candace, you’re all special people. Very, very special people.

And you’re doing something very important. I don’t even know if you know — maybe you don’t know. And, you know, sometimes you’re so into something, and you just don’t really feel how important it all is. What you are doing is so important for your community and for this country.

We will renew the values that unite our people as one America. As one team, we will build up our nation, we will lift up our forgotten communities, and we will defeat any threat. We will beat any challenge, we will overcome every obstacle, and we will achieve a glorious future of American greatness beyond our wildest dreams. And that’s what you’re doing.

To everyone here today: Keep up the great work. And I just want to say, from the bottom of my heart: God bless you. God bless your families. And God bless America. Thank you. (Applause.)

END 5:50 P.M. EDT

The inspector general for the Intelligence Community is Michael Atkinson. He is very sketchy.  Atkinson was previously legal counsel for the DOJ-NSD during the ‘stop-Trump’ tenure of John Carlin and Mary McCord. As a result, Atkinson was a participant in the weaponizing of the DOJ-NSD via FISA abuse, along with NSA database exploitation and tenuous FARA legal theories used to target political opposition.

In short, Atkinson seems dirty.  At the very least he hangs around dirty characters.

Today, according to Fox News reporter Catherine Herridge, ICIG Michael Atkinson testified the anti-Trump CIA ‘whistle-blower’, likely to be Michael Barry, did not inform Atkinson that Barry and his legal team already contacted staff working for HPSCI Chairman Adam Schiff when he submitted his complaint.  More sketchy.

After he took the complaint, ICIG Michael Atkinson then changed the rules for the ICIG office allowing a second-hand hearsay complaint to be processed.  Again, sketchy.

According to New York Times reporting earlier this week, the ‘whistle-blower’ (likely CIA operative Michael Barry) first tried to push the hearsay claims to CIA management through a colleague.  Fearing CIA management would not take the gossip seriously “the officer then approached a democrat House Intelligence Committee aide, alerting him to the accusation against Mr. Trump.”  Chairman Schiff never told anyone.

Buckets of sketchy.

Mr. Sketchy – ICIG Michael Atkinson

What is occurring is becoming clear…

After the 2018 mid-terms, and in preparation for the House “impeachment” strategy, House Intelligence Committee Chairman Adam Schiff and House Judiciary Committee Chairman Jerry Nadler hired Lawfare Group members to become committee staff.

Chairman Schiff hired former SDNY U.S. Attorney Daniel Goldman (link), and Chairman Nadler hired Obama Administration lawyer Norm Eisen and criminal defense attorney Barry Berke (link), all are within the Lawfare network.  [You probably saw Berke questioning former Trump campaign chairman Corey Lewandowski.]

It now looks like the Lawfare network constructed the ‘whistle-blower’ complaint aka a Schiff Dossier, and handed it to allied CIA operative Michael Barry to file as a formal IC complaint.  This process is almost identical to the Fusion-GPS/Lawfare network handing the Steele Dossier to the FBI to use as the evidence for the 2016/2017 Russia conspiracy.

This series of events is exactly what former CIA Analyst Fred Fleiz said last week. Fleitz has extensive knowledge of the whistleblower process. Fleitz said last week the Ukraine call whistleblower is likely driven by political motives, and his sources indicate he had help from Congress members while writing it.

Additionally, prior to the “whistleblower complaint” the Intelligence Community Inspector General did not accept whistle-blower claims without first hand knowledge. However, the ICIG revised the protocol to allow this specific complaint to be registered by the CIA whistle-blower.

Now it surfaces that the ICIG Michael Atkinson didn’t even review the Trump-Zelenskyy phone call transcript before forwarding the complaint to congress [SEE HERE]

The Intelligence Community Inspector General (ICIG) is Michael K Atkinson. ICIG Atkinson is the official who accepted the ridiculous premise of a hearsay ‘whistle-blower‘ complaint; an intelligence whistleblower who was “blowing-the-whistle” based on second hand information of a phone call without any direct personal knowledge, ie ‘hearsay‘.

The center of the Lawfare Alliance influence was/is the Department of Justice National Security Division, DOJ-NSD. It was the DOJ-NSD running the Main Justice side of the 2016 operations to support Operation Crossfire Hurricane and FBI agent Peter Strzok. It was also the DOJ-NSD where the sketchy legal theories around FARA violations (Sec. 901) originated.

Michael K Atkinson was previously the Senior Counsel to the Assistant Attorney General of the National Security Division of the Department of Justice (DOJ-NSD) in 2016. That makes Atkinson senior legal counsel to John Carlin and Mary McCord who were the former heads of the DOJ-NSD in 2016 when the stop Trump operation was underway.

Michael Atkinson was the lawyer for the same DOJ-NSD players who: (1) lied to the FISA court (Judge Rosemary Collyer) about the 80% non compliant NSA database abuse using FBI contractors; (2) filed the FISA application against Carter Page; and (3) used FARA violations as tools for political surveillance and political targeting.

Yes, that means Michael Atkinson was Senior Counsel for the DOJ-NSD, at the very epicenter of the political weaponization and FISA abuse.

If the DOJ-NSD exploitation of the NSA database, and/or DOJ-NSD FISA abuse, and/or DOJ-NSD FARA corruption were ever to reach sunlight, current ICIG Atkinson -as the lawyer for the process- would be under a lot of scrutiny for his involvement.

Yes, that gives current ICIG Michael Atkinson a strong and corrupt motive to participate with the Pelosi-Schiff/Lawfare impeachment objective.  Sketchy!

House Judiciary Committee ranking member Doug Collins filed an amicus brief yesterday (full pdf below) highlighting why the Judiciary Committee should be blocked from receiving grand jury material against the backdrop of an impeachment effort without support from the House of Representatives.

.

In the larger picture it is clear the Obama administration weaponized the institutions of government to target their political opposition. It is also increasingly clear a Hillary Clinton administration would have monetized the U.S. government.

President Obama’s team used the DOJ, CIA, FBI and IRS to target their opposition. The intelligence apparatus was weaponized; one small example that scratches the surface is the FBI/NSA database exploitation. Black files on DC politicians, private sector groups and individuals facilitating leverage, and we are still seeing the ramifications.

.

When former Overstock CEO Patrick Byrne recently discussed his role within the 2016  “political espionage” operations, he described the financial interests of political office; not coincidentally he also seems to have retreated into a safe-space.

Big multinational interests, Big Pharma, Big Ag, Big Global Banking interests, etc, were exclusively supporting both President Obama and candidate Clinton. The domestic politics of the U.S. were/are tools toward an end; and, so long as the person occupying the oval office did not interfere with Big Club objectives, they too would benefit financially.

The college kid wearing a pink pussy hat is oblivious, but the executive offices of the Deep State FBI, Intelligence Community, DOJ and the power structures within the House and Senate are not; they know.  It is the way of the swamp.

Why would a senate candidate spend $10 million to win an election that pays $300k/year? How do politicians become multi-millionaires while in office?

Likely a great many more people are aware of the bigger issues than ever before.  Perhaps this explains the dynamic of angst amid those same occupants.

Think about how much the DOJ and FBI did to protect and promote candidate Clinton.

Obviously, in their down-time discussions, they would have discussed and recognized some benefit would be forthcoming.

No entity would go so far out on an obvious limb of corruption if they did not perceive some personal benefit on the horizon.

Think about how much leverage James Comey would have held over the institution of the Office of the President if they had succeeded.  If the sum total of dirt on Trump filled a bucket, by comparison Hillary Clinton owns a landfill.

Thousands of bills written by the multinational lobbyists were awaiting her arrival.  Think of the scale of multinational effort behind TPP (Asia), TTIP (Europe), Paris Climate Treaty (Global), etc.  Literally tens of trillions of graft and scheme within reach of those global financial networks; at the fingertips of the multinational Big Club,… until Donald Trump.

Think of the scale of wealth, all headed to the top of the pyramid, that President Trump halted.  Domestically, all of those lobbyist plans/bills worthless on November 9th, 2016.  All of the DC politicians, sales people indulged to sell those bills, left teetering on the border of functional obsolescence….  It’s quite stunning to think about.

Thus, after the initial shock, all of those interests lashing out in rage; weaponizing every group they can muster.  Dispatching urgency to the corporate media forces. The pure unmitigated hatred that started immediately becomes much more understandable in this context.

Who is not exposed?

Impeachment is their best defense…