COMMENT: Dear Sir, thanks for the messages at your blog. Today I heard from my daughter that during the European soccer championship a Danish player got a heart attack. That was broadcasted but not that two days before he got a corona vaccin. My grandson of 9 yrs wants to have a vaccination. Why? He is listening to the dutch tv news for the youth in which the doctrines of the government is taught to the youngsters. You are right claiming that what has taken place is a communistic variant. I get the association with the cultural revolution of Mao in which the youth were ordered to act against their parents just like now is happening under the flag of science which represents the truth. In Mao’s days it was another truth. sincerely yours,
REPLY: The same was true behind the Berlin Wall. The youth were taught that the STATE was their true parent, and if their biological parents spoke against the STATE, they were to do their duty and report them. I find it ironic how the media is so willing to destroy their own future. It appears the warning which emerged from Stanley Milgram’s study is alive and well. The question arose of whether Germans were really different people to execute the Jews during WWII. His Obedience to Authority demonstrates that the media is no different and they too are blinding doing as told.
This is all taking place because of their fiscal mismanagement. This idea of borrowing, year after year, with no intention of paying anything back, is coming to an end. Instead of revising the monetary system correctly, they fear losing power. As such, they are forcing the Schwab solution of communism where you will ultimately “own nothing,” and only the elite will be in control (i.e., Big Tech).
The 5th edition of “Manipulating the World Economy” is about to hit the shelves of Amazon and Barnes & Noble. I included the COVID-19 virus plot in detail. They are doing this BECAUSE Keynesian Economics has failed. The management of the economy from central banks to the creation of debt is all imploding. This is their solution for fear that they will lose control. We will make an announcement once the book is available for purchase.
They know there will be civil unrest just as there was when these types of people tried to take over China and Russia. Back then, their ideas led to the deaths of over 200 million people. As long as these types of people retain power, we are the great unwashed, and the fewer the better. They will fail. They are destroying our very foundation of freedom using the canceled culture to silence all opposition. They will FAIL, but there will be a cost just as Hitler failed. The Holocaust-like policy is not just targeting the Jews — they are targeting everyone this time around.
Their view is that a little pruning of the tree makes it healthier — i.e., Eugenics.
Posted originally on the conservative tree house on June 30, 2021 | Sundance | 83 Comments
Last night Fox news host Tucker Carlson reported on a whistleblower contact from within the intelligence community who informed him the NSA was conducting electronic surveillance of his private communication (email and text messages). Tonight the NSA responded via Twitter:
Techno Fog noted something most of us would also note {SEE HERE} the NSA statement is an obtuse non-denial. However, there’s a lot more in that statement that should alarm everyone. I don’t know if I can cover it all here; this is actually serendipitous for a larger framework article I have been working on. But here’s some top-line initial reactions.
First, notice the time of the tweet message. Exactly 8:00pm to coincide with the beginning of Tucker Carlson’s broadcast. That’s typical political operative snark, which wouldn’t be too surprising if it were not the fact this is from the actual National Security Agency.
Many people in/around the intelligence apparatus have noted and confirmed to me that most of the modern human resources, within the working analytical part of the intelligence apparatus, are immature, solitary and emotionally stunted individuals. Accepting things as they directly appear, this subtle snark is actual confirmation.
Second, “Tucker Carlson has never been an intelligence target of the agency“, is akin to the NSA previously saying none of the 17 Republican candidates in the 2016 presidential race were “officially” targets of metadata surveillance; the surveillance just happened because, well, it was rogue contractors from our partner agency (FBI) using the facilitation of the NSA database for their opposition research. Oh, well, if that’s all it was… and not official NSA conduct… then, well, okay, move along. Or something.
In essence, TechnoFog’s point is well taken: “there’s something else going on here,” indeed there is.
Third, don’t get too granular to the point where you cannot just see the exhibited political nature of the statement. Someone at a very high level of the NSA wanted to transmit this obtuse denial in order to give the media some framework for an Alinsky rebuttal along the lines of : right-wing ‘conspiracy theorists’ concoct wild accusation by lying about the world’s premier electronic data collection and intelligence operation. It’s the high-minded defense that appeals to an elitist world-view of being above the fray.
The peasants are revolting and our above reproach NSA institution will not be defamed on such matters. The New York Times, Washington Post and Politico will take that framework and run with it.
Fourth, the last paragraph is stunningly false to anyone who has watched the events of the last few years unfold within the intelligence apparatus writ large. “The NSA has a foreign intelligence mission”…. etc etc. Yes, technically and legally that’s accurate. However, if the NSA is exclusively a foreign intelligence mission, then why does the FBI need access to the NSA database in order to conduct surveillance domestically? Additionally, if the NSA is exclusively a foreign intelligence mission, then why would domestic law enforcement operations even be allowedaccess to that database? The entire NSA narrative in that paragraph is brutally false; obviously so.
Fifth, this is not about Tucker Carlson. This NSA response is directed to the claim by Tucker Carlson, but the NSA response itself is now the story here, not the Carlson claim. This response should alarm everyone. Personally, I would never expect the NSA to be so transparently political in any external communication. The visibility is indicative of a more politically bold agency. We’ve been seeing that bold ‘in-your-face’ approach a lot recently from the FBI, DOJ, DHS and Defense Department.
As said, I have much more on this subject that will be released in the near future… In the interim this NSA “tweet” only highlights the baseline that Americans need to accept.
There are now officially four branches of government. The modern and corrupt Intelligence Community, the proverbial IC, is the intelligence branch that supersedes the executive, legislative and judicial branches.
The Executive, Legislative and Judicial branches of government all defer to, and facilitate, the Intelligence branch.
The Intelligence Branch of government is a public-private partnership that includes governmental agencies and private sector technology groups, Big Tech. The partnership is funded in part by public taxpayer dollars and massive financial interests like BlackRock and Vanguard. The IC Branch is a partnership between the U.S. government and the private sector; that is why various elements within the Intelligence Branch use ‘contractors‘.
Imagine how much BlackRock and Vanguard would be willing to pay for access to the NSA database that collects the electronic data on every single transaction, communication, and record of every entity in the entire country. Imagine how much money BlackRock and Vanguard could make with access to every single bit of private information within the U.S. business world.
Now that you understand the value of the public-private partnership within the newest and most powerful branch of government, the Intelligence Branch; ask yourself this question:
Posted originally on the conservative tree house on June 29, 2021 | Sundance | 279 Comments
In this OAN interview [Rumble Link Here] Natalie Harp outlines the duplicitous history of Bill Barr’s former statements relating to voter fraud and mail-in ballot fraud. After laying out the background of Barr’s statements as Attorney General, President Trump’s spokesperson Liz Harrington responds directly to the current position of Barr.
Posted originally on the conservative tree house on June 29, 2021 | Sundance | 135 Comments
Beyond the insanity of the U.S. southern border being unsecured, many people wonder how this entire logistical process is funded. The answer is quite simple; within every federal spending and appropriation bill there are carve-outs for various segments of the process.
The Department of Homeland Security and Department of Health and Human Services receive hundreds of billions in supplemental appropriation funding from within each federal spending package. Each of the COVID relief bills contained money to facilitate various elements of this process. Federal housing grants, food assistance programs, education funding, employment and income assistance, all of it, every single spending package, contains funding mechanisms to support the border invasion.
This is one of the largest private-public partnerships in the entirety of U.S. government. The religious or ‘faith-based’ immigration groups are also fuel for the problem. In the past 15 to 20 years illegal immigration and refugee settlement has been financially beneficial for every supportive Non Governmental Agency (NGA).
Slight quibble, the Biden administration has not “lost control” of the border. Illegal immigration is not an accident, a mistake, or any form of ineptitude. Nothing about this is unintentional {Go Deep}, we have tracked this for years.
The process of fundamentally transforming the United States of America, per Barack Obama statement, is exactly this mass illegal migration process. The Biden administration has full control over the border, every crossing is purposefully accepted as part of the operational goal.
There is no greater disconnect between DC and taxpaying Americans as the policy positions of Democrats and Republican in Washington DC surrounding illegal immigration. If congress really wanted to stop it, they could easily defund it. They don’t.
Posted originally on the conservative tree house on June 28, 2021 | sundance | 159 Comments
This is interesting and needs further research to confirm. John Fredericks is reporting today that Georgia may potentially decertify the 2020 election result for both the presidential race and senate race if the Fulton County audit confirms the alleged 30,000 fraudulent ballots. [Rumble Link Here] WATCH:
.
Keep in mind, there are a lot of financial grifters and opportunists connected to the audit storyline. It is worthwhile doing substantive local research in Georgia before taking the word of anyone on these critical issues. From the perspective of CTH the current status of the Garland Favorito lawsuit is not as solid as many people claim it is.
Posted originally on the conservative tree house on June 28, 2021 | sundance | 187 Comments
As disturbing as this statement is, considering the prior admissions of warrantless wiretapping by the FBI using the NSA database, this does not come as a surprise.
Remember, for five consecutive years the U.S. intelligence community has admitted to the FISA court they continually conduct illegal searches of U.S. citizen data, using the NSA database, and they admit to illegally extracting information which is illegally shared with interests outside the intelligence community.
Tonight on Tucker Carlson the Fox News Host outlined how an NSA whistleblower contacted him and told him the NSA was conducting electronic surveillance of his communication. To verify the authenticity of the claim the whistleblower told Carlson what the content of his private text messages and emails contained. While alarming in part, again this should not be surprising. WATCH:
Posted originally on the conservative tree house June 28, 2021 | sundance | 193 Comments
Apparently, if confirmed, the guiding hands that pull the puppet strings within the justice department have weighed the benefit of starting a full-scale civil war and determined it is not in their best interests, at least at the moment, and possibly not until they can get COVID lockdown 2.0 triggered, to anger 100 million very focused American patriots.
[Via Politico] Manhattan District Attorney Cy Vance has indicated he does not currently plan to charge the Trump Organization with crimes related to allegations of “hush money” payments and real estate value manipulations, according to a personal lawyer for Donald Trump.
Ronald Fischetti, a New York attorney who represents the former president, said on Monday that in a meeting last week, he asked Vance’s team for details on charges they were considering.
[…] According to Fischetti, members of Vance’s team said they were considering bringing charges against the Trump Organization and its individual employees related to alleged failures to pay taxes on corporate benefits and perks. It has been widely reported that those perks included cars and apartments and appear to only involve a small number of executives.
“We asked, ‘Is there anything else?’” Fischetti told POLITICO. “They said, ‘No.’” “It’s crazy that that’s all they had,” he added. (read more)
Posted originally on the Conservative tree house on June 28, 2021 | sundance | 249 Comments
As we have mentioned previously, the United States Department of Justice is prepared to use federal law enforcement (FBI) to secure their position. The purpose of the announcements should be clear to everyone. We discussed and outlined the background previously. {Go Deep 1} and {Go Deep Two}
In the background of these maneuvers corporate Big Tech, corporate U.S. media and those DC politicians under the control of multinational corporations, have been instructed to push the “domestic extremist” narrative.
Any organized and articulate truth-tellers are considered subversive, ie. against the interests of the U.S. government. The January 6th DC protest is being used as an illustrative example for that narrative.
In an intelligence community controlled operation (ex. General Stanley McCrystal), ideological deplatforming, censorship, content removal and ultimately control of voices who would warn of larger issues, continues daily. […] “The group, Defeat Disinfo, will use artificial intelligence and network analysis to map discussion of [opposition] claims on social media. It will seek to intervene by identifying the most popular counter-narratives and boosting them through a network of more than 3.4 million influencers across the country — in some cases paying users with large followings to take sides against [their opposition].” (source)
Let me be very clear… stop and hear the drums… Something is about to happen. Approximately 100 million American voters are considered dissidents now. Meanwhile the FBI is preparing for the American people to implement a grassroot solution to deal with a corrupt federal government; a solution I would call “extreme federalism”.
The solution to the scale of DC corruption is local and state action using the constitution, specifically the 10th amendment, against the advancing overreach of corrupt DC officials.
Extreme federalism is local and state government refusing to comply, totally ignoring, unconstitutional demands by the federal government. This approach can become visible in varying degrees of intensity. State laws protecting voting integrity is only one facet.
Beyond simple legislative push-back, imagine if the State of Texas refused to facilitate any task for the border visit by Kamala Harris. No Texas state trooper escorts, no security, no facilitation once the White House entourage exits the airport. Extreme federalism is the intentional use of the state right provisions outlined within the constitution to stop facilitating federal offices of any form or function.
Imagine if FBI field offices were forced to close by state action taking back ownership of the property by eminent domain. Imagine if state national guard elements were instructed not to comply with federal requests for support. Extreme federalism is local sheriffs, constitutional officers, rebuking unconstitutional decrees and refusing to comply with federal agencies.
Extreme federalism is executed along the same concept of “sanctuary cities” or “sanctuary states” defying federal law. However, extreme federalism is the reverse scenario where the unconstitutional efforts are identified by states who create sanctuaries for law-abiding citizens who forcefully demand representative government and self-determination.
Extreme federalism is a reaffirmation of the original intent of the United States constitution, and we do not need F-15s and nuclear weapons to achieve it. What we need is strong–will, brave state-level leadership and unrelenting citizen determination. We The People are the people we have been waiting for.
Parents and citizens confronting Marxist indoctrination within ideological school boards is one example. That is why the Feds & Media are fighting back against visible grassroot activity. They can sense this approach gaining wider acceptance as local populations see success in their efforts.
Local Sheriffs may soon align with the population they are sworn to protect and serve; that enhances the risk to the federal collective mindset.
State legislatures and State Governors taking back absolute control from federal overreach is a bottom up way for extreme federalism to have massive impact. Local congressional district elections are then fought-out based on the priority of the local community. Again, more original intent that is adverse to the federal collective.
Those behind the Biden administration, those who worked within the corrupt system to put him in office, can see how they might well lose control if this continues. They are acting exactly as we would expect given this growing reality.
Posted originally on the conservative tree house on June 28, 2021 | Sundance | 367 Comments
Governor Ron DeSantis, the information highlighted in the example below is provided as affirmation to what you likely already know; however, I provide the enhanced granular background to contemplate as you look toward the horizon. This information is provided publicly because there is a purposeful reason to continue pulling back the curtain for a larger electoral awakening.
As a former congressman you know the duplicity of the bureaucratic federal system that you left behind. The traditional framework of three co-equal branches of government has been usurped by a larger and deeper network now represented by terminology describing the intelligence community. The example below highlights just one way the system is self-protecting.
On October 19, 2020, former U.S. Attorney General Bill Barr appointed John Durham as special prosecutor under authorities provided by DOJ regulations [28 cfr 600]. However, AG Bill Barr did not tell the public at the time of the appointment. Within the original appointment AG Barr notes the reason for doing this quietly [Page 2, Paragraph (e)]:
“Pursuant to 28 C.F.R. § 600.9(b), I have determined that the notification requirement … should be tolled until at least after the November 3, 2020 election because legitimate and investigative privacy concerns warrant confidentiality.“
In essence, AG Bill Barr stated he did not want to impact the 2020 presidential election with a notification to congress or the public of this appointment. While the justification for this approach is clearly within the unspoken rules of the DOJ not wanting to give the impression of interference in political elections, we must also accept these unspoken DOJ rules only flow in one direction – when Democrat party politicians need to be protected.
However, beyond the justification for not informing the public that U.S. Attorney John Durham was now empowered with special prosecutor authorities before the 2020 presidential election, there are much bigger issues that surface; and this must be accepted and discussed in its purposeful totality.
♦ Notification of the special prosecutor appointment did not surface until December 1, 2020, when AP journalist Michael Balsamo first wrote about it (SEE HERE). Based on a recent widely-viewed article published in the Atlantic, we now know Balsamo was summoned by AG Barr to Main Justice for an informal lunch were several issues were discussed: “Barr’s betrayal came on December 1, over lunch in the attorney general’s private dining room with Michael Balsamo, a Justice Department beat reporter at the Associated Press.” (link)
The most recent headlines surround AG Bill Barr telling Mr. Balsamo: “To date, we have not seen fraud on a scale that could have effected a different outcome in the election,” thus the current narrative du jour. However, in hindsight we can now enhance the background of that Dec. 1st meeting between AG Bill Barr and AP journalist Michael Balsamo to include the attorney general informing the AP about the appointment of John Durham as a special prosecutor. Balsamo wrote about the Durham appointment on that exact date, December 1, 2020.
The reason for drawing your attention to the timeline is to emphasize the nature of how the DOJ, in this example AG Bill Barr, coordinates with specific intent to make certain information public at certain times, while holding back information that may be adverse to DOJ interests which are often political.
Additionally, and very importantly, do not let it go without emphasis how a special prosecutor appointment would NEVER remain secret, without leaks, from personnel within the larger DOJ institution who are in close and frequent contact with their allies in the media.
Given the scope of known leaks from the DOJ is it almost certain the New York Times, Washington Post and Politico knew of the October 19th appointment, but did not report on it because the background material was adverse to their collective interests.
Now, please allow me to highlight the obvious and more alarming political motive; this is where a larger understanding of duplicity becomes even more important.
♦ We find out on December 1st (after the election) that AG Bill Barr previously appointed John Durham as a special counsel to investigate criminal matters on October 19, 2020. AG Bill Barr notified the Associated Press (Michael Balsamo) and the Senate Judiciary Committee on the *exact same day. The sequence is: Barr tells the media, then Barr tells congress:
*It is critical to understand how the DOJ system operates at a political level -when they have a very specific political intent- while noting the dates of activity and the dates of notification of that activity; two very different dynamics.
Given the background of information on how Bill Barr operated as a U.S. Attorney General, we can now see the specific intent for the AG to appoint Durham on that specific date, in that specific way.
(1) The shift in the investigative definition/authority now locked down President Trump from demanding the pre-election release of any information that might touch upon the Durham special counsel purview. Any request by President Trump would now be met with the familiar shield of an “ongoing investigation“. You will note this was one of the primary purposes of the Rod Rosenstein appointed Robert Mueller special counsel, and this shield was deployed against the office of the President numerous times when the president requested information be made public. The administrative state is self-protecting.
(2) Notice the date of the appointment, October 19, 2020. This date blocked the President from demanding public release and simultaneously fell just 93 days before the Biden inauguration of Jan 20, 2021. This provided Joe Biden one week to use the 100 day back-look nullification of executive branch action. In essence, Biden could have easily ended the Durham probe if he wanted. Strategic timing.
(3) Additionally, notice how AG Bill Barr provided another exit if needed. Under DOJ regulations [28 cfr 600] a special counsel must come from “outside government“; John Durham was not outside government and did not resign his position prior to the appointment. Bill Barr gave the appearance of a special counsel appointment while knowing the legal validity could easily collapse upon challenge (if the Biden administration choose):
“(a) An individual named as Special Counsel shall be a lawyer with a reputation for integrity and impartial decisionmaking, and with appropriate experience to ensure both that the investigation will be conducted ably, expeditiously and thoroughly, and that investigative and prosecutorial decisions will be supported by an informed understanding of the criminal law and Department of Justice policies. The Special Counsel shall be selected from outside the United States Government. Special Counsels shall agree that their responsibilities as Special Counsel shall take first precedence in their professional lives, and that it may be necessary to devote their full time to the investigation, depending on its complexity and the stage of the investigation.” (link)
Obviously Bill Barr is a smart man. He would know the regulations he cites would require the special counsel to come from “outside the U.S. government,” thus such a simple flaw cannot be looked upon as anything except purposeful.
(4) If the 2020 election outcome did not remove President Trump, notice the special counsel appointment would have continued to hamstring him and keep the administrative state protected from sunlight. Yet, another insurance policy put into place amid a variety of DOJ and FBI insurance policies deployed.
Everything within the Durham appointment as special counsel, the timing, the justification for secrecy, the manner & method, and later the way it was revealed through AP journalist Michael Balsamo points to a coordinated strategy. Note the “kick the can” aspect to the strategy began well before the 2020 election.
Returning to the original -albeit hidden at the time- date of the appointment… October 19, 2020, someone around President Trump was informed about the shift in the Durham probe to a special counsel; and someone justified to the president why that special counsel would remain hidden. Perhaps Bill Barr himself, but I doubt it. It is more likely a ‘high level’ DOJ official put the spin on the appointment to someone like Mark Meadows or the White House counsel.
How do we know that President Trump was informed, manipulated and conned?…
Listen to this very specific speech segment he gave on October 19, 2020, the exact date of Durham becoming a special prosecutor, from Prescott Arizona:
Kamala finally made the trip to the border, although it was really just the airport in El Paso.
During Trump’s speech on Saturday he mentioned that Biden had violated his oath by not protecting our borders. In other words, China Joe failed to protect America. In fact, Biden encouraged illegal aliens to pour in and get free stuff on the taxpayer’s dime.
That’s exactly what they did—they’ve been arriving in droves and from many countries—not just Central American ones. Biden ordered those caught to be released. Kamala concurred. That is, she did before she became Vice Resident. Now she’s changed her tune and weakly asked them all not to come.
Trump was adamant about closing our southern border. He began construction on walls. Ice and the Border Patrol were allowed to do their jobs. Trump sent out a strong message and the flow of ‘migrants’ dwindled.
Kamala made a half-hearted attempt to visit the border, but all she did was visit El Paso. In reality it’s most likely she wants to keep the borders open. She and Joe know the illegal newcomers will most likely illegally vote for Democrats. The Socialist Democrats may be in for surprise though. Many Mexican Americans side with Trump because he represents law and order. Latinos have strong family and religious values. They could be voting Republican in the mid-terms. They know an open border invites crime including child abuse, women getting raped, and a giant influx of drugs and crime. Americans, regardless of ethnicity, don’t want that.
I have created this site to help people have fun in the kitchen. I write about enjoying life both in and out of my kitchen. Life is short! Make the most of it and enjoy!
This is a library of News Events not reported by the Main Stream Media documenting & connecting the dots on How the Obama Marxist Liberal agenda is destroying America
Centinel2012 