The Big Ugly Begins, President Trump Targets the DeceptiCons, Those GOPe Establishment Politicians who Need To Be Removed

Posted originally on the conservative tree house on February 28, 2021 by Sundance

During his CPAC speech President Trump named some of the DeceptiCons in congress who have blocked the MAGA agenda.  President Trump identified some of the politicians by name in both the House and Senate who need to get primaried.  WATCH:

…”The Democrats don’t have grand-standers like Mitt Romney, little Ben Sasse, Richard Burr, Bill Cassidy, Susan Collins, Lisa Murkowski, Pat Toomey; and in the House, Tom Rice, South Carolina, Adam Kinzinger, Dan Newhouse, Anthony Gonzalez. That’s another beauty. Fred Upton, Jamie Herrera Butler, Peter Meyer, John Katko, David Valadeo. And of course the warmonger, a person that loves seeing our troops fighting, Liz Cheney. How about that? The good news is in her state, she’s been censured. And in her state, her poll numbers have dropped faster than any human being I’ve ever seen. So hopefully, they’ll get rid of her with the next election. Get rid of them all.”…

President Trump has established the Political Action Committee that will fund primary opponents to those republicans who have failed to support the America First agenda.

Let the MAGA voters take action to remove the targeted DeceptiCons and the Big Ugly will have officially begun…

Peter Navarro Guarantees At Least Three Indictments From John Durham Investigation, Along With Current FBI Resignations

Posted originally on the conservative tree house on February 28, 2021 by Sundance

A very bold statement from former White House Senior Advisor Peter Navarro on television this morning.  Appearing with Maria Bartiromo, Navarro said he “guarantees there will be at least three criminal indictments” as a result of the Durham investigation.

Navarro also shares that President Trump’s CPAC speech will be a “full-throated defense of populist economic nationalism”, and Navarro eviscerates a host of internal advisors who he views as not being in alignment with the priorities of the America First agenda.

Sunday Talks, Devin Nunes Disusses Capitol Hill Fencing and Expectation ‘The Dirty Cops Will Be Held Accountable’

Posted originally on the conservative tree house on February 28, 2021 by Sundance

Devin Nunes appears with Maria Bartiromo to discuss current events.  Topics include the fencing and barbed wire around the Capitol, his CPAC speech, the Durham investigation and how Stefan Halper was used to frame Lt. Gen. Michael Flynn.

Nunes continues to hold out hope that John Durham will bring charges against those within the DOJ and FBI who targeted the Trump campaign and worked with the DNC.

There are two genders, male and female. That is all- claims of anything else is mental illness

Re-Posted from FEB 27, 2021 AT 10:29 AM

Senator Rand Paul questioned health nominee Rachel Levine on the process of gender ‘reassignment.’ Only there is no such thing as reassignment.

Wishful thinking and medical mutilation won’t change the fundamental DNA structure that resides in every cell of our bodies. Our sex is part of who we are—not an ‘assignment.’

One’s sex cannot be changed. Neither by means of surgery, nor hormones.

Yet for some reason we live in an age where the ’trans’ delusion is getting ’normalized.’ Wishful thinking is now considered science. We can’t debate the issue without being smeared as a hater or ’transphobic.’ Transgender people are the new sacred cows. One can no longer reasonably question the delusion. Government said so. Stooges representing science said so. Biden said so. Burly boys can claim to be girls and compete alongside them in sporting events—and they usually win. They also get to go into the girls’ locker rooms and we’re not supposed to question that, either.

As a libertarian I don’t care if men and women think they can transmogrify into the opposite sex. If they are adults and not hurting others, that’s their business. I do have a problem when it comes to minors wanting trans surgery and big government overruling parents who don’t want their kids mutilated. Teenagers aren’t mature enough to make such a life-changing and irreversible decision. It’s also why I don’t think children should be allowed to vote. They lack life experience and will usually vote for socialism and free stuff.

Senator Paul knows it’s impossible to ’transition’ from one sex to the opposite and he asked Levine simple and straightforward questions about whether we should allow children to make decisions that have permanent and major health implications—both mental and physical. Levine dithered. Paul finally stated it as clearly as he could:

“I’m alarmed that you’re not willing to say absolutely that minors shouldn’t be making decisions to amputate their breasts or to amputate their genitalia. For most of our history, we have believed that minors don’t have full rights and that parents need to be involved, so I’m alarmed that you won’t say with certainty that minors should not have the ability to make the decision to take hormones that will affect them for the rest of their life. Will you make a more firm decision on whether or not minors should be involved in these decisions?”

Levine still refused to answer the question and repeated “her” memorized statement:

“Senator, transgender medicine is a very complex and nuanced field. And if confirmed to the position of Assistant Secretary of Health, I would certainly be pleased to come to your office and talk with you and your staff about the standards of care and the complexity of this field.”

It’s not a complex and nuanced field. It’s not medicine. It’s doing harm to the bodies of children and doctors are supposed to do no harm. Why wouldn’t she answer the question? Her disingenuous response disqualifies her from office.

Paul was quickly attacked as being transphobic. We aren’t supposed to question the supposed science behind transgenderism because the trans people’s feelings might get hurt. To protect their feelings, any criticism of the transgender fad is labeled as ‘hate speech.’ Trans people have become a special caste and immune from any criticism whatsoever. A book that explained the transgender delusion was recently removed from Amazon. They said the book was ‘hate speech.’ This type of online book burning sets a very dangerous precedent.

We must be able to criticize government officials regardless of their race, religion, or sexual orientation. We must be able to debate and ask questions without fear of getting cancelled by identity politics.

—Ben Garrison

JoeBama Put The Gang Back Together Inside The DOJ – John Carlin Returns as Acting Deputy AG

Posted originally on the conservative tree house on February 27, 2021 by Sundance

Those who have followed all of the internal research will know the name John Carlin.  As noted in this text message below Carlin has returned to the DOJ and is currently Acting Deputy Attorney General inside Main Justice.  Once again the corrupt DOJ is attempting to secure itself from sunlight upon prior activity, very corrupt activity.

John Carlin was the assistant attorney general and head of the National Security Division inside the DOJ when efforts against the Trump campaign and incoming administration were underway.  John CarIin was previously chief of staff to FBI Director Robert Mueller.

In September of 2016 Carlin manipulated the FISA court by misleading them on the Section 702 certifications.  Carlin never informed the court of FBI contractors having access to the NSA database and exporting the search results to unknown actors. The FBI was using the database to monitor 2016 political campaigns and political opposition.

Carlin announced his resignation Sept 27, 2016, the day after he filed the Government’s proposed 2016 Section 702 certifications. Carlin departed the NSD October 15, 2016, five days before the Carter Page FISA was approved by the FISC.

It was John Carlin who ultimately facilitated the fraudulent FISA application against Carter Page in order to continue surveillance of the risk represented by Donald Trump. John Carlin’s legal counsel in the NSD was Michael Atkinson.

You might remember the name Michael Atkinson from the first impeachment effort against President Trump.  Atkinson became the Intelligence Community Inspector General (ICIG) who changed the rules to allow an anonymous complaint (Ciaramella) from inside the CIA and National Security Council member, Alexander Vindman.

The network of the crew is all connected by their efforts.

John Carlin was replaced in the DOJ-NSD (October 2016) by Mary McCord.  You might remember it was Mary McCord who went with Deputy AG Sally Yates to confront White House legal counsel Don McGahn when the January 2017 DOJ and FBI efforts against National Security Advisor Michael Flynn were underway. With the new position Michael Atkinson became the legal counsel for Mary McCord in the NSD.

Mary McCord left the DOJ-NSD and went to work for the democrat party controlled congress after the mid-term election in 2018.

Mary McCord went to work for Adam Schiff and Jerry Nadler; she was the lead agent inside the first impeachment effort that used information from her prior legal counsel Michael Atkinson who was now Inspector General of the Intelligence Community (ICIG).

Again, the network of the crew are all connected by their efforts.

Now we have a better feel for the role played by John Carlin, it helps to make sense why the Joe Biden administration would bring him back inside the DOJ to control any/all sunlight that might resurface.  Carlin’s prior corrupt activity, fraud to the FISA Court, makes him a willing and vested participant in sunlight avoidance for the Biden team.

Do you really think this crew could allow Donald Trump to have a second term?

[CTH – 2020] Those who use DC for influence and affluence control the mechanisms within a  self-actuating system. This includes both Democrats and Republicans as they both feed from the same trough.  In the effort to remove Donald Trump, both wings of the uniparty bird were aligned with an identical purpose; Democrats carrying out their effort openly, and the republican elements operating covertly as to retain the DC premise.

One common misconception is thinking the Mueller special counsel was an outcome of an action by President Trump when he fired former FBI Director James Comey.  This is false.

The special counsel process was a continuum in the effort to remove the threat that Donald Trump represented back in the early primary days of 2016.  The system, writ large, was aligned with this purpose.

There would have been a special counsel investigating the nonsense around ‘Trump-Russia’ regardless of Comey being fired. The special counsel was always part of the plan.

In October 2016 Deputy Attorney General John Carlin, in charge of the National Security Division of the DOJ bailed out of the effort after misleading the FISA court on their surveillance activity and setting up the introduction of the FISA warrant against Carter Page.  Carlin was replaced by a more committed traveler/ideologue named Mary McCord.

With Mary McCord in place to continue the DOJ-NSD aspects to the resistance and removal effort, the DOJ and FBI simply continued the process after the November 2016 election.  Internally all of the officials, essentially lawyers, within the DOJ-NSD were carrying out the removal objective and cleverly attempting to cover their tracks.

We see the creation in plausible deniability with the use of Bruce Ohr as a bridge between the politically corrupt DOJ-NSD and the politically corrupt FBI.  Ohr was carrying the messages from outside the system (Chris Steele) into the system. This was his function.

Everyone knew what Ohr’s mission was.  Anyone today who claims they had no idea what the #4 official was doing is simply lying.  That is part of the plausible deniability part. It was set up that way.  Everyone knew what to expect, everyone knew the goals and objectives and every part of the process was compartmentalized to create these functional denials in case anything went sideways; or if the objective failed.

Andrew Weissmann was inside this DOJ-NSD system during John Carlin’s tenure, and Weissmann was a primary participant in transferring the spygate operation into the special counsel.  Again, it’s one long continuum.  Tashina Gauhar was the internal tool who had the objective to facilitate the effort and block any DOJ leadership effort that might disrupt the goal.  She too did her job very well.

This is where it must be accepted the DOJ-NSD was the legal side of the usurpation effort.  Everyone at the top three levels inside the Main Justice system was participating.  Now, four years later, we see some of those names returning.

The 2017 special counsel became the continuation of the 2016 process.  Once in place it was the special counsel who ran the show from Main Justice.  Additional operatives were brought in to coordinate the plan.  Pictured group below:

No action took place inside Main Justice that was not controlled by this group. Nothing.

When congress was battling for information, it was the special counsel who held control. Nothing was ever released without the special counsel releasing it.  Nothing was ever redacted, removed, or hidden without this group doing the functional work to control it.

This point is critical because too many people have failed to accept that any information released from Main Justice was purposefully released as part of a strategy.  An example of that control is the release of the Carter Page FISA application in July 2018.  The Mueller team was the group who released it; they did so with a purpose.

When ever anyone was asking who was redacting the Lisa Page and Peter Strzok text messages, it was this group, the Mueller team.  They also removed some.

This group also controlled what Inspector General Michael Horowitz was allowed to review as part of any of his investigative inquiries.  Everything was labeled as part of the special counsel investigation…. that’s how they justified and got away with it.

Simultaneously this group was leaking to their friends and allies in the media to frame narratives beneficial to their effort.  The media were willing to assist their friends; and indeed, they are friends.  They run in the same circles, attend the same parties, go to the same functions and meet both personally and professionally.  This is the network.

To understand or expose the largest part of the corruption that exists within DC you really need a thread; a fulcrum example to share that exposes how this allied network operates. That example is best evidenced, irrefutably, within the story of how Senate Select Committee on Intelligence Security Director James Wolfe was caught facilitating the objectives.

Wolfe was caught by an external investigator from the FBI Washington Field Office named Brian Dugan.  While the special counsel likely knew the periphery of what the Supervisory Special Agent (SSA) was doing (a leak investigation), it was not until the complete investigative file was turned over to the special counsel in late January 2018 when the special counsel group grasped the totality of the issues involved.

Immediately the special counsel group formed an attack plan because the outcome of Dugan’s investigation was toxic to their interests in the early part of 2018.   The special counsel stripped the investigative file of the details damaging to their ongoing corrupt effort.  They could not allow the public to know the FISA application was in the hands of their media allies since March of 2017.  This story cuts to the heart of corrupt activity.

What the special counsel team did in order to protect their activity is incredible.  Only someone as arrogant and Machiavellian as Andrew Weissmann could have planned to carry out this scheme.

The background of the Wolfe story is the thread that lays the corrupt special counsel activity naked to sunlight; and the Wolfe story exposes just how the process from early 2016 all the way through the impeachment effort of August 2019 was put together.  The ramifications are so significant that when you become aware of the Wolfe story everything within the motive of the Mueller team slowly reconciles.  Dig this story hard and everything reconciles.

Yes, FISA abuse was/is a big deal; yes, crossfire hurricane was/is a big deal; yes, the Carter Page FISA application was/is a big deal; yes, the Chris Steele aspect was/is a big deal; but in the final analysis that’s only the beginning of the effort.  Look at what the special counsel was doing from May 2017 to April 2019 and the scale of that effort is stunning.

Corrupt Republicans and Democrats worked together; the legislative branch worked in coordination with usurping elements inside the executive branch; the intelligence apparatus and the State Dept worked to assist both the legislative branch and the usurping agents inside the DOJ-NSD and Main Justice.

….And, worst of all, none of it could have been carried out if there was not someone very close to President Trump, someone very much participating with the effort, who was whispering in his ear about making appointments that were specifically designed to allow the effort to continue.

Who recommended ODNI Coats? Who recommended DOJ-NSD head lawyer Michael Atkinson, the top FISA review authority and counsel to the head of the NSD, transfer from the NSD to become Intelligence Community Inspector General? Both recommendations had purpose; look at what ICIG Atkinson did with NSC operative Alexander Vindman? These internal actions were not accidental.

That’s ugly.

That’s the truth.

That’s where cold anger gives way to righteous fury.

…and believe me the National Republican Party is petrified of that story.

This entry was posted in 1st Amendment4th AmendmentAG Bill BarrBig Governme

Profiles In Cowardice: A Court No Longer Supreme

The Supreme Court decided to not get involved in the most contentious election in our nation’s history

Re-Posted from the Canada Free Press By Ray DiLorenzo —— Bio and ArchivesFebruary 27, 2021

“You always know the mark of a coward. A coward hides behind freedom; a brave person stands in front of freedom and defends it for others.”— Anonymous

We have been given a clear look at some of those who took an oath to preserve and protect the Constitution of the United States and yet, when called upon, took a path to hide beneath their desks.

The Supreme Court of the United States is supposed to be above politics. They are commissioned to be the caretaker, the preserver and protector of the Constitution, everything we stand for, the last resort of those looking for justice. They are the final arbiter when deciding the limits of government power and fair treatment. And yet, what happens when Chief Justice John Roberts continually punts rather than makes the play?

Roberts: Apparently works for the deep state political machine rather than the people

When he does play, he apparently, more times than not, works for the deep state political machine rather than the people. Even George Soros, in Davos, recently commented that he can count on the chief justice. Why is that?

It was John Roberts that recently sided with Pennsylvania Democrats on important election questions. He refused to hear an appeal by Republican officials, leaving in place an extension allowing partisan civil servants to count ballots that had no post mark three days after the election. At the same time, they bypassed an entire set of election challenges.

Back in December, it has gone viral that Justice Roberts was heard screaming behind closed doors at his associates that he and the other liberal justices did not want to take the Texas election-fraud case, a case supported by more than 20 states. When Justices Thomas and Alito brought up the Gore 2000 election case, Roberts was heard saying, “I don’t give a **** about that case,” quarreling that “we didn’t have riots.”

That alone should tell you all you need to know. Our chief justice apparently has been compromised. The Chief Justice of the Supreme Court decided to not get involved in the most far-reaching set of cases of his career. He retreated from a sacred duty that will literally decide the future of America. Not only that, Justice Roberts confirmed to the country that riotous mobs do indeed rule.

Who is John Roberts? Is he the John Roberts that rewrote the Obamacare legislation so that it would pass court muster? Is he the John Roberts on the Epstein flight logs? Is he the John Roberts that jumped into the political fray like a presidential candidate disputing President Trump’s justifiable criticism of the rogue 9th US Circuit Court of Appeals?

Kavanaugh and Barrett are mere theoretical thinkers rather than legal doers

Does anyone remember Justice Brett Kavanaugh or Justice Amy Coney Barrett? They were confirmed and no one has heard from them since. Where have they been? They ducked out of the Pennsylvania case, a case where the state legislature was illegally bypassed in favor of political partisans making decisions concerning the counting of mail-in ballots, nullifying the wishes of the state legislature, the only state authority on such issues. Kavanaugh was silent while Barrett said she didn’t have time to review the case…a dog-ate-my-homework excuse if I ever heard one.

It turns out to many observers that Kavanaugh and Barrett are mere theoretical thinkers rather than legal doers. Perhaps they dislike criticism. Maybe they want Roberts to like them, a left over aspiration from high school. Perhaps they don’t want to mix with the common folk or get their robes dirty. Bad timing to be concerned with that. Maybe they are just cowards that would much rather enjoy the pomp than live the circumstance.

The Supreme Court decided to not get involved in the most contentious election in our nation’s history. An election that, for many Americans, and even the casual observer, was rife with fraud, cementing our country into third world status. Whatever the justices were thinking, they have abandoned tens of millions of Americans to think they have to now fend for themselves, to take it upon their own devices to preserve and protect the Constitution of the United States. We should ask for our money back.

Is Biden Back in the Basement?

Armstrong Economics Blog/Politics Re-Posted Feb 27, 2021 by Martin Armstrong

Joe Biden appears to be the first president to skip doing a State of the Union Address which is typically done by the end of February by tradition. However, it is not uncommon that a president skips the State of the Union Address during the year in which they were inaugurated. Both Washington and John Adams delivered the address but Thomas Jefferson abandoned that practice in 1801, in favor of a written message. It was about 100 years later that the message was delivered by a speech before Congress by President Woodrow Wilson in 1913. That was an important year for it was not just the creation of the Federal Reserve, but also the Income Tax.

Since Franklin D. Roosevelt’s speech in 1934, the annual speech has become a tradition. Before 1934, it used to be more of a year-end speech delivered in December. However, the President would also take office in March rather than January. The 20th Amendment changed the opening time for congress moving the speech to January/February. Pelosi will forever be remembered as the only Speaker of the House to tear up Trump’s State of the Union Address, which was probably the most disrespectful treatment of the office of the president by anyone in history.

The Constitution requires the president to provide an update on the country. It does not specify any precise timing. What normally happens is the House and Senate set the date for the joint session of Congress. What has everyone concerned about is that in fact, Joe Biden said in January that it would be forthcoming. Then White House Press Secretary Jen Psaki said on Feb. 16 that Biden’s first appearance before a joint session “was never planned to be in February.” This has led to rumors that he is back in the basement with bouts of dementia since Psaki is clearly trying to revise history. This is only made more plausible when members of the Democratic Party ask for Biden to relinquish his codes to launch nuclear weapons. That in itself raises serious questions about Biden and now no State of the Union after he said he would.

It certainly appears that if there was EVER a need for a State of the Union it is now. The Democrats have so divided the country and the Capitol is still surrounded by Pelosi’s Wall. Of course, we are back to the Swamp and it is already clear that Jen Psaki is just a spin-artist. When it came to Cuomo, she simply said: “The president has been consistent in his position.” She added: “When a person comes forward, they deserve to be treated with dignity and respect. Their voice should be heard and not silenced.”

Arizona Judge Rules State Senate Can Review 2.1 Million Maricopa County Ballots

Posted originally on the conservative tree house on February 26, 2021 by Sundance

Judge Timothy J Thomason has ruled the Maricopa, Arizona, board of elections must turn over 2.1 million ballots to the republican state senate so they can be reviewed for any election issues. [direct pdf of ruling here]

ARIZONA – The five-member Board of Supervisors argued that the ballots were secret, that the Legislature had no right to access them and that the subpoenas issued by Senate President Karen Fann were for an illegitimate purpose, among other arguments.

The Senate’s lawyers contended that the constitution gives the Legislature the role of maintaining the purity of elections and make sure voter integrity is protected, that the subpoenas were legal and a proper use of legislative power.

In his ruling, Thomason agreed with the Senate on all those arguments, saying the subpoenas “are legal and enforceable.”

“There is no question that the Senators have the power to issue legislative subpoenas,” Thomason wrote. “The Subpoenas comply with the statutory requirements for legislative subpoenas. The Senate also has broad constitutional power to oversee elections.

“The Arizona legislature clearly has the power to investigate and examine election reform matters,” the ruling says. “The Subpoenas also do not violate separation of powers principles. Production of the subpoenaed materials would not violate confidentiality laws.” (read more)

The Arizona Senate released the following statement:

U.S. Attorney John Durham Announces His Departure from Office, No Details of Special Counsel Role Continuing

Posted originally on the conservative tree house on February 26, 2021 by Sundance

An announcement today from the U.S. District of Connecticut John Durham is a little perplexing.  According to the announcement USAO John Durham is resigning from office effective February 28.   However, there is no information about his prior appointment as special counsel to review the DOJ and FBI conduct in the Trump investigation.

Here’s the announcement:

After serving as the United States Attorney for the District of Connecticut for more than three years, and as a federal prosecutor in Connecticut for more than 38 years, John H. Durham today announced his resignation from the U.S. Attorney’s Office, effective at midnight on February 28.

“My career has been as fulfilling as I could ever have imagined when I graduated from law school way back in 1975,” said U.S. Attorney Durham.  “Much of that fulfillment has come from all the people with whom I’ve been blessed to share this workplace, and in our partner law enforcement agencies.  My love and respect for this Office and the vitally important work done here have never diminished.  It has been a tremendous honor to serve as U.S. Attorney, and as a career prosecutor before that, and I will sorely miss it.”

Prior to his appointment as an interim U.S. Attorney in November 2017 and subsequently as the presidentially appointed U.S. Attorney in February 2018, Mr. Durham served as an Assistant U.S. Attorney in various positions in the District of Connecticut for 35 years, prosecuting complex organized crime, violent crime, public corruption and financial fraud matters.  From 1978 to 1982, he served as an Assistant State’s Attorney in the New Haven State’s Attorney’s Office, and from 1977 to 1978, he served as a Deputy Assistant State’s Attorney in the Office of the Chief State’s Attorney.

First Assistant U.S. Attorney Leonard C Boyle will serve as Acting U.S. Attorney upon Mr. Durham’s departure.

“The Office will be in the extraordinarily capable hands of Len and our superb supervisory team who, together, guarantee that the proper administration of justice will continue uninterrupted in our District.”

Mr. Boyle has served as First Assistant U.S. Attorney since June 2018, when he returned to the U.S. Attorney’s Office after serving as Deputy Chief State’s Attorney in Connecticut for approximately nine years.  He previously served in the U.S. Attorney’s Office from 1986 to 1998, and from 1999 to 2004.

Mr. Boyle is the 53rd U.S. Attorney for the District of Connecticut, an office that was established in 1789.

The U.S. Attorney’s Office is charged with enforcing federal criminal laws in Connecticut and representing the federal government in civil litigation.  The Office is composed of approximately 68 Assistant U.S. Attorneys and approximately 54 staff members at offices in New Haven, Hartford and Bridgeport.  (LINK)

Former U.S. Attorney General Bill Barr appointed John Durham as a special counsel on October 19, 2020, and did not tell anyone until after the November election. [LINK]

On December 1, 2020, the Attorney General notified congress in a letter:

However, here’s the issue… under DOJ regulations [28 cfr 600]  a special counsel must come from “outside government“; so did John Durham resign his position prior to the appointment, or has Bill Barr just given the appearance of a special counsel appointment while knowing the legal validity of it will collapse upon challenge?

§ 600.3 Qualifications of the Special Counsel.

“(a) An individual named as Special Counsel shall be a lawyer with a reputation for integrity and impartial decisionmaking, and with appropriate experience to ensure both that the investigation will be conducted ably, expeditiously and thoroughly, and that investigative and prosecutorial decisions will be supported by an informed understanding of the criminal law and Department of Justice policies. The Special Counsel shall be selected from outside the United States Government. Special Counsels shall agree that their responsibilities as Special Counsel shall take first precedence in their professional lives, and that it may be necessary to devote their full time to the investigation, depending on its complexity and the stage of the investigation.” (link)

Obviously Bill Barr is not stupid, he would know the regulations he cites would require the special counsel to come from “outside the U.S. government”, so what gives?

Did Durham resign to fulfill the statutory requirements of the special counsel?  Was everything prior to now just the review and investigative phase, and now that decisions must be made Durham needs to be “outside the United States Government”?

Or is this all just an optical pantomime and the entire Durham investigation is concluded with nothing coming from it?

The appointment:

Boxed In Biden

Re-Posted from FEB 25, 2021 AT 9:38 AM

Biden puts kids in cages, but not in schools

Biden repeatedly attacked Trump for putting children of illegal aliens into ‘cages’ near the southern border—all in the name of national security. Kamala pushed this further by saying Trump was putting ‘babies’ in cages and how horrific it was. The always hyperbolic Alexandria Ocasio-Cortez ramped it up further and stated that immigrants in camps on the southern border were being “brutalized with dehumanizing conditions and dying!” She then went on to call them concentration camps.

The Democrats’ attacks implied Trump was a racist who had no regard for the lives of innocent children. And babies. How dare he separate them from parents?

What Biden and the Democrats didn’t mention that it was Obama who built those cages. Now the Biden regime is actually defending putting kids in cages after they reopened. Only now they are softening the language and calling them ‘facilities.’

Ocasio-Cortez is still angry, but not nearly as vitriolic about the camps as she was when Trump was in charge. She stopped short of labeling Biden a racist, but she released a very fierce and furiously worded statement: “This is not OK.” Wow. That no doubt got Dementia Joe’s full attention!

They hypocrisy of Biden, the Democrats, and especially AOC is on full display.