Armstrong Economics Blog/Disease Re-Posted Jun 3, 2021 by Martin Armstrong

QUESTION: Is it true that California can vaccinate even 11-year-olds without parental consent?

GH

ANSWER: No. But the Washington D.C. Council passed a law in late December 2020 that allows children as young as 11 to receive vaccines if they are deemed capable by a doctor of giving informed consent. If an 11 year old cannot give consent for sex and are deemed incapable of giving consent to everything else, then why this vaccine?

San Francisco passed an ordinance that allowed a 12-year-old to give consent to be vaccinated.

My problem here is that we have politicians who do not have to even have graduated kindergarten to run for office, making decisions that defy all logic. They are acting like this is the Black Plague and 50% of the population will die when in fact it is no different from the normal death toll of the flu annually.

To me, something is just not right. When politicians are in on this whole agenda, they have ABANDONED all duty to protect not just the Constitution, but the lives of the people. REAL scientists are warning about COVID-32 if we do not understand the origin of COVID-19. All the voices of reason have been canceled and anyone raising any question is classified as an Alt-Right Nazi. This has gone way too far and simply labeling anyone who questions anything as a CONSPIRACY THEORY is a clever way never to have to answer the question.

There are scientists who are concerned that these vaccines may sterilize many. These are serious questions that MUST be answered with PEER REVIEW analysis – not CNN and Politicians. Given Gates’ obsession with climate change and overpopulation, while funding birth control chip implants into women, this does not inspire confidence in our world leaders who cozy up to Gates worldwide.

Posted originally on the conservative tree house on June 2, 2021 | Sundance | 234 Comments

Tucker Carlson produced a segment on the issues around Anthony Fauci’s recently released emails.  It is worth the watch.

When you consider the scale of the full-court press that was unleashed to demand compliance with the COVID vaccines, I would also like to ask a question.

.

When we take a breath and remind ourselves of the curious emphasis, from every possible institution, pushing everyone to take a COVID vaccine.  I have a question…

Would a person who took the vaccine be more or less likely to admit the COVID narrative was based on a fraudulent presentation of risk?

Perhaps the answer to that question is the reason for the originating “take the vaccine” demand.

Posted originally on the conservative tree house on June 2, 2021 | Sundance | 527 Comments

Inside the Fauci emails there is one that stands out for many reasons.  On February 1st NIH scientists were telling Anthony Fauci the COVID-19 (SARS-CoV-2) has “unusual features” that “potentially look engineered”. Later in the email they highlight the genome of SARS-CoV-2 appears “inconsistent with expectations from evolutionary theory”.

Despite this analysis, only a few days later Anthony Fauci vehemently proclaimed the SARS-CoV-2 strain was a naturally occurring Bat virus, and anyone questioning the natural creation of the virus was ridiculed, marginalized and dismissed; some even lost their jobs.

We understand in hindsight a motive for Anthony Fauci to want to hide the origin of COVID-19 as he was personally invested in “gain of function research” (the weaponization of viruses) which he restarted in 2017. However, there’s something more….

Beyond Fauci’s fraud in denying the engineering likelihood, which is a big issue and deserves major investigation, there’s two other points that need to be discussed; and we will not see them in the media.

♦ First, the shift that everyone had noticed about two weeks ago – where the White House and media was now supporting discussion of the “lab leak theory” – starts to make sense.

The release of these emails was part of a FOIA fulfillment.  The administrative state knew these emails were going to be released, and that explains why multiple vested interests started trying to get out in front of the information by opening up the “lab leak” discussion.  In essence, knowing this information was about to enter the public bloodstream, all of those vested interests had a reason to get out in front of the story.  Hence, the previously forbidden discussion(s) and topics were now approved for public debate.

That starts to bring us to the second point.  Why would the Deep State release these emails, instead of just hiding them?

♦This second point should be very familiar to CTH readers…. The FOIA fulfillment of these emails has a very distinct fingerprint that implies there is something much larger in the background.

You will remember the Carter Page FISA application was also released under the guise of a FOIA fulfillment.  On July 21, 2018, the Mueller team (led by Andrew Weissmann) released the Page FISA application, the first release of a FISA application in history, with the motive to hide/bury the much larger issue of President Obama’s administration using the Intelligence Community to conduct surveillance on their political opponents.

Everyone jumped on the stories around the FISA release, and few people paused to ask why this “Top Secret” Title-1 Search and surveillance authorization document was released in the first place?   Requesting the public release of such a top secret document would have been the easiest FOIA request to deny… but the DOJ choose to release it.

The Mueller/Weissmann motive was simple: they needed to cloud the bigger issue of surveillance of a political campaign; AND they knew James Wolfe had already leaked it to the media on March 17th of 2017.

Everyone was excited to read and discuss the content of the FISA application and exhaust thousands of column inches on the discussion as people took sides based on the DOJ/FBI justification for the FISA itself.

The Weissmann release had the intended effect… people stopped debating whether President Obama was conducting political surveillance on behalf of Hillary Clinton and their political alignment.  THAT debate was a much bigger issue that just disappeared with the emergence of the FISA application.

The release of these Fauci emails has an almost identical smell, which would indicate there is a much bigger story in the background that this release is intended to dilute.

Perhaps the bigger story is the creation of the virus; perhaps the bigger story is an intentional release of a manufactured virus; or perhaps the bigger story is the manipulation of the virus -the creation of a fraudulent narrative- to achieve political goals.

The COVID-19 narrative becomes a tool to achieve a variety of objectives: • The stalling of a fantastic economy that was benefiting every American voter. • Mail-in ballots that can be used and manipulated to achieve fraudulent results. • Controls over debates to avoid a weak candidate being exposed or confronted. • The deployed ‘excuse‘ for a very visible lack of voter enthusiasm for the puppet (Biden).  In short, without COVID as a tool the manufactured election process is more difficult. The ‘never let a crisis go to waste‘ strategy includes the necessary creation of a crisis.

Regardless of the BIGGER ISSUE being covered-up; and just like the release of the FISA application; there’s little doubt the administrative state saw the release of these Fauci emails as a strategy toward keeping something else hidden in the background.

Something far more damaging….

If my suspicions are correct, FOX News and the professional Republican party apparatus will stay as far away from this as possible.

Armstrong Economics Blog/Disease Re-Posted Jun 2, 2021 by Martin Armstrong

QUESTION: Marty, With all your contacts and your model where you were forecasting that the more serious disease would be in 2022, do you think this is the natural mutation of this virus that they created?

PN

ANSWER: I believe that these people were more interested in creating a virus that would not result in genocide, but would create sterility to reduce the population. We have no idea of the long-term effects and this desperate push to have everyone vaccinated is unbelievable in the entire history of free societies. This totally violates every principle of a free government. In the United Nations Declaration of Human Rights, they stated:

Many people – though not all
– have been able to secure freedom from torture,
unjustified imprisonment, summary execution,
enforced disappearance, persecution and unjust
discrimination, as well as fair access to education,
economic opportunities, and adequate resources
and health-care.

There is absolutely nothing anywhere that states a government has the right to force anything with regard to health upon its people. It must always be a choice!

Biden is the perfect president. He is clueless and has no idea of this agenda. He is a stooge and just goes along with the script. They are desperate to criminally charge Trump and his whole family in New York State, for the sole purpose to send a signal that ANYONE who is not a career politician from the SWAMP – should never dare step foot in their playground. We have such serious problems they are not funny and there is nobody in Washington who will defend the people no less the media.

Viruses are efficient. Once released, they will routinely evolve to circumvent any vaccine. That is their nature for it is how nature survives – survival of the fittest. It will mutate to survive and in the process, it may kill the very host it is infecting.

There is a 13-year cycle in Influenza outbreaks which was reported on January 26, 2020. The last pandemic with respect to the strain of the Influenza was 2009. The next one of those to reach a possible level of a pandemic will be in 2022. This is where the largest death toll appears to be most likely. Keep in mind that the last deadly pandemic began in 1918 but it lasted for two years into 1920. Clearly, the worst year ahead appears to be 2022.

These variants, especially one in India, maybe what increases in 2022. Boris Johnson is already saying that Britain may need to remain closed down because of this India variant. All viruses will try to become more efficient at transmission as more people are protected. That is plain and simple. They teach that in health class 101.

It might be a new bird flu and it might even be a bacterial pandemic. With the Indian variant, there is the appearance of this black fungus. Clearly, COVID-19 has been greatly exaggerated for you have more than a 99% chance of surviving and most people testing positive have no symptoms.  Gates was behind an experimental vaccine he got the EU to try out in Italy. What I was told by doctors in Italy, that those who died from COVID were often the people who received the previous experimental vaccine.

Armstrong Economics Blog/BRITAIN Re-Posted Jun 1, 2021 by Martin Armstrong

Here is the annual list of deaths from the UK office of National Statistics. Clearly, shutting down the economy and all of this hype – build back better – was for a predetermined agenda. The death rate is not anything drastically unusual to warrant destroying jobs and crushing the economy.

As I have said, the BUILD BACK BETTER slogan was talked about at DAVOS in January 2019 about one year before COVID was released. This agenda has always been about the Great Reset and COVID was just a ploy to justify closing down the economy to end fossil fuels.

Posted originally on the conservative tree house on May 29, 2021 | Sundance | 184 Comments

This is a brilliant move by the owner of Fiddleheads Cafe in Mendocino, California.  The owner charges an extra $5 to customers who wear masks.  Not only does this discourage liberal moonbats from dining; thereby creating a more positive, fun and friendly atmosphere; the owner uses the $5 surcharge to fund charity.  In addition there is an additional $5 surcharge if you are caught in the cafe bragging about your vaccination.

In many red states, and regions that value freedom, the aggregate mask-wearing populace is now self-identifying as leftist sheep. Any negative incentive against the masked moonbats is a method to cull the risk of contact with the unstable folks.  Brilliant !

CALIFORNIA – A California cafe owner is charging customers who wear face masks $5 to dine at his establishment.

Chris Castleman, 34, who owns Fiddleheads Cafe in Mendocino, Calif., put up a sign on Sunday notifying customers of the additional fee, according to NBC News.

“I don’t think $5 to charity is too much to ask from mask wearing customers who claim to care so much about the community they live in,” Castleman told the news outlet.

[…] “It’s about time that the proponents of these ineffective government measures start paying for the collateral damage they have collectively caused,” the cafe owner said. (more)