Fauci Has no Answer why to Force People Who Had Covid to Vaccinate


Armstrong Economics Blog/Opinion Re-Posted Sep 11, 2021 by Martin Armstrong

QUESTION: Marty; I had covid-19 and it was like the flu. Why do I have to now get vaccinated? I have never heard of getting the flu and then the doctor tells you to get the vaccine after the fact. I agree something is not right. This must be part of some sinister agenda. Any ideas?

HU

ANSWER: What you have said is true. I have NEVER heard any doctor tell you to get the flu shot after you ready had the flu. Fauci’s response to that question shows his bias. He is not about to concede anything. He told CNN:

“I don’t have a really firm answer for you on that.”

Fauci went on to say it was a question now of  “durability” but the vaccines need booster shots every 6 months and maybe daily pills.

The Ethics of Forced Employment Vaccination by Dr. Julie Ponesse


Posted originally on the conservative tree house on September 11, 2021 | Sundance | 122 Comments

Canadian professor Dr. Julie Ponesse is an expert in ethics who has been eloquently teaching college students for twenty years.  Her story is one story, a profound story; and it is our story.

It is the story of a world gone mad, and the people within it – strong enough to recognize the brutal insanity.

This is the professor I want teaching my grandchildren.  This is the teacher they deserve….

I despise those in power of every stripe who have put our world into this place of darkness. A place devoid of common intellectual sense, created by weakness, and driven by ideological minds with no regard for freedom, humanity or human purpose.  Participation in evil enterprise it itself evil.  My tribe will not participate.  We stand defiant and resolute.

..”In a time of universal deceit, telling the truth is a revolutionary act.”

Welcome to the revolution.

Take a Look At This Jaw-Dropping Gibberish From Autocratic Biden Today, Days After Dictating Terms of Employment to the Nation Biden Decries Autocracy


Posted originally on the conservative tree house on September 11, 2021 | Sundance | 282 Comments

I don’t usually draw too much attention to Gibberish Joe, because most of the time what he espouses comes from the brain trust of someone else; and I respect the time of people here and do not want to subject them to the insane cognitive mush coming from a guy who is genuinely a low-brow doofus.   However, THAT SAID, you just gotta take a listen to this one.

If this example isn’t evidence that Biden reads stuff given to him by others; and has absolutely no cognitive or intellectual comprehension of what the fundamental meaning is behind the words;  I honestly don’t know what else I could provide to convince you.

In this semi-coherent 90 second soundbite; the content of which flies over the head of the provider, Politico; Joe Biden is telling the media about his conversations with Chinese Chairman Xi Jinping and Russian President Vladimir Putin.  Biden says that both Xi and Putin are “autocrats” who dictate to the citizens of their nations, and in conversation with them – those leaders have questioned the viability of ‘western democracy‘ in an era where polarization of the electorate is so extreme.   Biden is calling them “autocrats” and trying to defend “democracy”…. ok, you with me? Now, WATCH:

These actual statements are being muttered by the same guy who just 36 hours earlier told the entire American population that he “has lost patience” with half the nation, and as an outcome, is going to FORCE a mandatory injection (COVID “vaccine”) into the arms of every citizen who wants to work in the United States.

Biden is literally decrying “autocratic governance” today, while being the biggest autocratic executive this nation has ever seen.

And not a single friggin’ journalist could see this – and point it out immediately in their gaggle?  Or challenge him to reconcile those statements?   Seriously?  This is nuts !

Good grief, someone -effen anyone- get me a press credential!

But the issues are bigger. The more important issue is right there.

This is not hypocrisy.

This is not cognitive dissonance…. not at this stark level of reality.

This is something else entirely…

This is evidence that Biden is controlled and delivering words and policies that are abjectly disconnected from his worldview.

Apparently, and this is a dangerous thing to realize, Joe Biden is incapable of seeing the disconnect between what he believes he is doing, and what he is actually doing as a result of what others are constructing.

Looking carefully at the captured off-the-cuff presser, Joe Biden is not being intellectually dishonest.  In that video segment with the media he really believes Xi and Putin are autocrats, and views himself as a representative of democracy.  He believes that to be true, because he is cognitively disconnected from what just took place 36 hours earlier.  This is evidence that the totalitarian mandate announced from the office of the president, was not his policy.

This is like Joe Biden saying, “You will never see me getting out of a red limousine, because all of the world’s most dangerous dictators ride around in red limousines“.  And no one saying, “Mr. President, please sir, turn around – look at your vehicle – you just got out of a red limousine” – and then watch his face as he sees the outside of the car for the first time.

I would prefer that Joe Biden be blindingly hypocritical, and I would prefer to be able to point out his hypocrisy… but this is not that.

This is far more serious and far more dangerous.

This is a representative example of the Office of The President being controlled by others, and Joe Biden with NO CAPACITY to stop them from doing it.  Likely due to a severe decline in his mental acuity, Biden cannot even see his participation in their endeavors.

FULL Video prompted – Follow link:

An Articulate Nurse Dealing With COVID Hospitalization Gives Honest Insight About What Really is Happening – Alarming Secondary Confirmation of Details Provided and Cited


Posted originally on the conservative tree house on September 11, 2021 | Sundance | 497 Comments

A discussion between Stew Peters and a hospital nurse who has direct contact with COVID patients and all aspects of COVID treatment is a must watch.  {Direct Rumble Link} Really, this gets better as the discussion gets more detailed.  WATCH

.

This is not random speculation or an anecdotal claim.  To further support the real-world outline explained by the nurse, CTH has received some very specific details from inside the medical system where board certifications are determined.  What follows below is not connected to the discussion above; however, specific leaked documents provided to CTH support what that nurse is saying.

Doctors in general, and pediatric doctors specifically, are being told by licensing boards & regulatory agencies tied to the political systems of healthcare –  that medical providers board certification and licensing could be in jeopardy if they are found to be discussing negative vaccine outcomes and/or contradictory issues about COVID-19 treatment in non private settings.

Meaning, if doctors speak publicly they are putting their license at risk.  Below is a copy of the WARNING LETTER.

[Source LINK for citation – However, please be discrete in sharing]

If the vaccines were not generating statistically significant negative outcomes, this type of letter would not be needed.   For whatever reason, the medical boards need to stop doctors and healthcare providers from explaining what is happening in the real world.

The medical system claims that surround the COVID-19 story are tenuously being held in place by bureaucratic systems and political agents within the regulatory bodies.  As you can see above they view honest public discussion as a risk to their position.

Think about it from a common sense perspective. If the claims behind COVID-19, and the variants as an example, were honest and genuine; and if the benefits of the vaccine were true as claimed; the medical establishment would not need to threaten doctors, and they would not view sunlight as a risk to their objective.

Why would any honestly constructed institution need to threaten voices within that system against discussion of every day events as they take place?

These are beyond RED FLAGS !!

Biden’s Medical Tyranny


Posted originally on GrrrGraphics.com on SEP 10, 2021 AT 12:22 AM

Obey Or Else

Biden went full authoritarian today. The whispering mumbler in chief made a speech calling for mandatory vaccination.

It is clear he is demonizing those Americans who refuse to take the dangerous jabs, which he calls ‘safe and effective.’

China Joe also made an ominous statement:

“We’ve been patient, but our patience is wearing thin and your refusal has cost all of us.”

Who is this ‘we?’ It’s the usual globalists who want us to become more like France, New Zealand, and Australia. They want vaccine passports. They want us tracked. They want us to submit to a Chinese-style social credit system. They want our freedom of speech eliminated. They don’t want us to question the totalitarians who want a new world order. In Australia the ‘authorities’ are now actually using that phrase.

Fortunately here in Montana, we have a law against firing employees who refuse the injections. There is also hope in Florida. Governor Ron DeSantis stated,

“My job is to protect your individual freedom. My job is not to protect corporate freedom. We have a society in Florida where people can make the best decisions for themselves and their families. And that’s what we’re doing by protecting against these vaccine mandates.”

Biden has threatened to go after states who are standing up to his tyranny. If Joe keeps pushing medical tyranny he might find Americans are more willing to push back than many overseas countries. We are not like the folks in Australia. We are armed and will defend ourselves from a tyrannical government who might want to forcibly push needles into our arms. If we allow ourselves to become citizen cattle, such mandatory jabbing will never end.

— Ben Garrison

We Have No Rights


Armstrong Economics Blog/Corruption Re-Posted Sep 11, 2021 by Martin Armstrong

COMING SUMMER 2020 – UPDATE May, 2020: The plandemic website has been hacked https://plandemicmovie.com All uploads on YouTube and most other media outlets have been removed. The powerful vaccine lobby in collusion with all governments are behind this. A COVID vaccine seems to be their “final solution” (Bill Gates’ words), now being heavily promoted. #PlandemicMovie

Australia Bans Doctors from Prescribing Ivermectin


Armstrong Economics Blog/Tyranny Re-Posted Sep 10, 2021 by Martin Armstrong

Australian General Practitioners have also been banned from prescribing Ivermectin to Covid-19 patients. Let us make something very clear. They have NOTHING to treat symptoms. They are effectively banning doctors from treating people with COVID-19. Politicians, I believe, have been bribed by these people to restrict treatment to only the vaccines. They are now deliberately killing people. Israel has already confirmed that the Pfizer vaccine is ONLY 39% effective. Then, nearly 50% of the people in the hospital with COVID have already been fully vaccinated. All the elderly people dying they attribute to COVID would have died from the flu.

No in universities, you better pull your children out ASAP. Textbooks are appearing in colleges that now say that the people dying of COVID are because of those people who have opposed lockdowns. We are in the midst of an all-out assault by governments who have joined this Great Reset intent upon dividing the people to hate one another and to force the suppression of all opposition.

The DEFUND THE POLICE is so they can replace all local police with a national police force so they will have no connection to the local community and will follow orders and shoot any who resist. I have warned that this is the lesson governments learn from the Nika Revolt.

CDC is Blocking Doctors from Writing Prescriptions for Ivermectin and Hydroxychloroquine


Armstrong Economics Blog/Corruption Re-Posted Sep 10, 2021 by Martin Armstrong

COMMENT: Dear Mr. Armstrong,

As you know I’m a long-time subscriber and prominent US physician. I am also a vigorous advocate of the early treatment of COVID-19. You are spot on but there is more. 

I have treated hundreds of patients with Covid-19. Starting yesterday nearly every pharmacy has blocked me and others from prescribing ivermectin and hydroxychloroquine for Covid-19. They are saying the CDC is preventing them. 

What happened to the well codified off-label use in the US. What happened to the right to try. It’s gone. And our professional leadership is in lockstep. Sickening. 

ANONYMOUS

Why Did So Many Doctors Become Nazis?

REPLY: As I have said, I had a respiratory issue and was tested 5 times for COVID all negative. I ended up going to a specialist at Tampa Hospital in charge of pulmonary. He told me the tests were invalid. He also said the ONLY thing they had to treat COVID patients was hydroxychloroquine. Two doctors said they believed I had COVID despite the fact all the testing was NEGATIVE. So I personally have no idea.

WHY is the CDC now interfering in how people are treated? Do we have once again a crisis in the medical profession with so many doctors subscribing to this new norm of reducing the population again? This is getting really out of hand and the Biden Administration is now posing a threat to society. Someone behind the curtail is pulling very hard strings and Biden probably would never even be consulted. All we can hope is people in media are denied these drugs and just maybe they may stand up and protect society just for once!

Independent studies have shown that ivermectin is effective:

CONCLUSION: Based on the totality of the existing evidence above, the FLCCC strongly
recommends ivermectin be used in both the prevention and treatment of all phases of COVID-19
in both vaccinated and unvaccinated populations.
Retracted Research
The totality of evidence for ivermectin is large enough that removal of any single data set, trial or
study has minimal impacts. The integrity of one study in Egypt (Elgazzar et al) out of the then 28
RCT results available, was recently called into question. While we share the concerns about this
study, the removal of its data from the most comprehensive meta-analyses did not change the
conclusion that ivermectin is highly effective in both prevention and treatment.

Australia Bans Ivermectin


Posted originally on the conservative tree house on September 10, 2021 | Sundance | 264 Comments

If you suspect the extremely heavy-handed Australia/New Zealand COVID-19 mitigation efforts might be a beta-test for just how far a government can go to control the citizens therein, well, this latest development appears to be an affirmation in that direction.

The ruling authority in Australia has just banned doctors from prescribing Ivermectin.  The Advisory Committee for Medicines Scheduling and the Australian National COVID Clinical Evidence Taskforce, have determined that any effort to mitigate COVID-19 with therapeutics will likely diminish the goal of vaccinating the entire population.  Therefore Ivermectin, which has saved thousands of lives and is widely in use in multiple countries including India, is now official banned from use by Australian doctors.  Quite remarkable….

AUSTRALIA – Today, the TGA, acting on the advice of the Advisory Committee for Medicines Scheduling, has placed new restrictions on the prescribing of oral ivermectin. General practitioners are now only able to prescribe ivermectin for TGA-approved conditions (indications) – scabies and certain parasitic infections.  […] These changes have been introduced because of concerns with the prescribing of oral ivermectin for the claimed prevention or treatment of COVID-19. Ivermectin is not approved for use in COVID-19 in Australia. (LINK)

Consider this from Studies within the NIH:

♦ (STUDY – 1) “Moderate-certainty evidence finds that large reductions in COVID-19 deaths are possible using ivermectin. Using ivermectin early in the clinical course may reduce numbers progressing to severe disease. The apparent safety and low cost suggest that ivermectin is likely to have a significant impact on the SARS-CoV-2 pandemic globally.” (LINK)

♦ (STUDY – 2, INDIA) “There were no severe adverse drug events recorded in the study. A 5-day course of ivermectin was found to be safe and effective in treating adult patients with mild COVID-19.” (LINK)

The Australian government is banning a therapeutic treatment with a history of success in order to force the citizens into a situation where they must take the vaccine.   Here comes the black-market.

Roe v Wade & Vaccines – The Court Must Choose Right to Privacy Still Exists


Armstrong Economics Blog/Rule of Law Re-Posted Sep 10, 2021 by Martin Armstrong

COMMENT: Marty; I have always voted Democrat and I voted for Biden. But I want to say his vaccine mandate is so inconsistent with everything I can no longer vote Democrat again. I got this in the mail asking for money from the Democrats saying to defend Roe v Wade. I thought the idea was the government should not tell a woman what to do with her body. If Roe v Wade was so important, then how do they support mandatory vaccines? I have lost all trust and faith in government.

Thank you for being logical rather than just a zealot in these confusing times.

PV

REPLY: The Democrats are no longer promoting what is best for this country. I am hearing the same from other Democrats I have known for years. Many are starting to open their eyes. Somehow, we have to get back to the middle. The Democrats are trying to figure out how to get a wealth tax into their $3.5 trillion spending spree. They may get a tax on trading and will probably implement that on everything with perhaps stocks being an exception. Even that seems debatable. This is clearly pushing Schwab-Gates agenda as we head into 2022.

You are right. Roe v Wade was based on an earlier decision Griswald v Connecticut which established the right to privacy. That was a law that married people would not use birth control. How do you enforce such a law? Does a police officer have to inspect you before having sex? It was held that such a law could not be enforced and there was the right to privacy. Therefore, Roe v Wade was rooted in that principle aside from if you agree or disagree with the subject of abortion. It is indeed inconsistent as a matter of law that you can mandate vaccines but uphold Roe v Wade and the right to privacy.

Honestly, this is becoming so messed up it is hard to keep track of all the twists and turns. Logic has completely vanished today. I would argue in court that if vaccines can be mandated, then there can be no right to privacy. I am not sure even how a judge is supposed to arrive at a logical opinion. I would certainly raise Roe v Wade to challenge these vaccines and let the Democrats choose.