NEOCONS – Destroying Our Western Civilization


Posted originally on Jul 23, 2025 by Martin Armstrong 

Nikita Khrushchev We will bury you

Neoconservatives (neocons) are a faction within U.S. foreign policy circles who advocate for an aggressive, interventionist approach to promoting American interests and values abroad, which is the cover story, along with spreading democracy, which we do not even experience. Their hostility toward Russia stems from several key ideological and strategic motivations that date back to when Khrushchev said, “We will bury you,” a philosophical boast that he believed communism would defeat capitalism, much like Sparta defeated Athens.

2019 Ursula become President

Neoconservatives view Russia under Putin as an authoritarian, revisionist power that suppresses democracy, violates human rights, and threatens liberal democratic values, including the WOKE agenda. They see regime change or containment as necessary to weaken Russia’s influence. Russia was communist, but that fell. They are now capitalists, but they have shifted their focus from communism to authoritarianism, which is indistinguishable from that of any Western country. We may elect a president as Russia does, but we have unelected moles within the Deep State that act in their own self-interest. In Europe, the head of the EU does not stand for an election, nor does anyone in the Commission. Ursula was appointed on December 1st, 2019. She has NEVER stood for any democratic position in history, yet she calls Putin a dictator who has stood for election.

John_Kennedy_Nikita_Khrushchev_1961

Many neocons (especially older figures) retain a Cold War mindset, seeing Russia as the successor to the Soviet Union—an existential adversary that must be confronted rather than accommodated. They distrust diplomacy with Moscow, believing it only emboldens aggression. They act with their disdain and aggression, insisting it is self-defense because that is what Russia intends.

Diplomacy Merz_on_Ukraine_No_hope_left_for_a_diplomatic_solution_t

While the AFD in Germany opposes supplying Ukraine with endless weapons, Merz is a diehard Neocon and is doing everything in his power to ensure that Germany is attacked to justify World War III. He has insisted on an exception for deficit spending, ending Germany’s austerity, all for defense. He says there is no diplomatic solution, and this is right out of the Neocon Playbook – never talk to the enemy, for they may lead to peace.

2024_10_30_16_56_43_NATO_Considers_Opening_a_Tokyo_Office_to_Have_a_Permanent_Indo_Pacific_Footprint

Neoconservatives push for NATO expansion (e.g., advocating for Ukraine’s membership) and support arming proxy forces (like in Syria or Ukraine) to roll back Russian influence. They view this as a means to solidify U.S. global hegemony. They have promoted NATO expansion to Asia and have wanted to open NATO headquarters in Japan.

Neocons often argue that showing restraint (e.g., not responding forcefully to Russian actions in Crimea or Syria) encourages further aggression. They favor military buildups, sanctions, and regime-change strategies to pressure Moscow. Yet, they have never won a single aggressive war since World War II. Robert S. McNamara even apologized for taking the USA into Vietnam, admitting that they believed Russia was involved, “We were wrong. It was just a civil war.”

Bribes Behind Doors

Critics argue that neoconservatives are influenced by defense contractors and lobbyists who benefit from prolonged conflict. While not all neocons are directly tied to these interests, most are closely tied to them. Their policies align with a permanent war economy. Lindsey Graham, a U.S. Senator, and his most significant political contributors include industries such as defense, healthcare, and finance. For example, his top defense donors are Defense contractors Boeing and Lockheed Martin.

Georgia_McCain Grachm Propose_To_join NATO

Senators John McCain and Lindsey Graham have supported the idea of Georgia joining NATO, emphasizing the importance of strengthening ties and security in the region. They have advocated for NATO enlargement to include Georgia as part of a broader strategy to counter Russian influence. Then with a straight face, the Neocons claim Putin’s Russia as an imperialist power seeking to dominate Eastern Europe (e.g., Ukraine, Georgia) and the Middle East, which are their exact goals. They believe that only forceful U.S. action can prevent Russian hegemony in these regions, necessitating confrontation.

Yet, when General Wesley Clark went to the Pentagon after 911, he was told they were invading IRAQ and intended to take seven countries simply because they claimed they used to be leaning toward Russia. Yet they insist that Russia is imperialistic when it does the same thing.

Kristol the war over Iraq

Some neocons prioritize Russia because they grew up hating Russians. This is their historical baggage (Cold War-era policymakers dominate their ranks). They instigated the Ukraine War to draw Russia into a direct confrontation and have no problem sacrificing Eastern Europeans to kill Russians. Bill Kristol even argued that invading Iraq would somehow bring peace to the Middle East, when this was supposed to be step one for the invasion of the Middle East.

2025_07_18_21_28_22_Merz_says_Ukraine_will_receive_long_range_missile_systems_very_soon_

The Neocons who now control Germany, France, the Netherlands, Britain, Poland, all the Baltics, and Scandinavia have succeeded in usurping power to create WWIII. Sweden was neutral in WWII – today they joined NATO and have placed a target on the back of every citizen. They do not care about any Eastern European. They are merely pawns on their chessboard to conquer Russia.

War Cartoon

They told the Ukrainian people in 2014 to overthrow their government, for this was their moment for peace. Then they instructed the UNELECTED government to attack the Donbas and start this civil war to draw in Russia.

World GDP 2024

China is harder to confront militarily without incurring catastrophic economic consequences, as it is becoming the largest economy in the world. China is the largest economy in the world, when calculated using Purchasing Power Parity data from the World Bank (with growth estimates from the IMF), and including estimates of the undervaluation of GDP, adding the grey market of China, which is extensive. The underground economy in China is much larger than in the USA or Europe.

NATO_Defeat Russia_in_3_Days Adam Kinzinger

Criticism of Neocon Policies

Opponents argue that neoconservatives always overestimate U.S. power (e.g., Iraq War blowback. Neocons like Kinzinger have actually claimed the US can defeat Russia in 3 days.

2025_07_23_09_31_05_MATO would not expand eastward
1991 NATO Will Not Move East

The Neocons have escalated risks of nuclear war, pushing NATO to Russia’s borders, begging for a fight. They lied to Gorbachev, telling the press they never “promised” that they would not move nukes right to Russia’s border. Our Neocon did the very same thing that Khruschev did in 1962. The Russians at least staged a coup and removed Khrushchev, who was replaced by Brezhnev. There is a movie, The Courier, about how a Russian was tipping off the US about the missiles heading to Cuba. These Neocons have sought to surround Russia with nukes right up to their borders. They deny their actions and claim this is self-defense, when in fact it is offensive, trying to provoke war.

Cuba Front Page 10 28 1962

The Cuban Missile Crisis occurred in October 1962 and was a 13-day confrontation between the United States and the Soviet Union over the deployment of Soviet nuclear missiles in Cuba.

  • October 22: Kennedy announces the discovery of the missiles in a televised address and imposes a naval blockade (quarantine) around Cuba to prevent further Soviet shipments.
  • October 24-25: Soviet ships approach the blockade but stop or turn back, avoiding direct conflict.
  • October 26-27: Tense negotiations between the U.S. and USSR. Soviet leader Nikita Khrushchev sends two conflicting messages—first offering to remove missiles if the U.S. promises not to invade Cuba, then demanding the U.S. also remove missiles from Turkey.
  • October 27 (“Black Saturday”): A U.S. U-2 plane is shot down over Cuba, killing pilot Rudolf Anderson. The U.S. prepares for possible military action.
  • October 28: Khrushchev announces the withdrawal of Soviet missiles from Cuba in exchange for a U.S. promise not to invade Cuba and a secret agreement to remove U.S. missiles from Turkey, which was withheld from the public to make it sound as if only Russia backed down.

The Neocons constantly undermine diplomacy (rejecting détente in favor of perpetual confrontation). They cannot accept the fact that the Soviet Union collapsed with communism, which was the archenemy. They transformed their hatred of communism into racism against all Russians. Friends from Germany report that they can “feel” war is in the air.

Gary Underwood

One document that the CIA has been hiding is the Gary Underwood document that states plainly that the CIA ASSASSINATED Kennedy. The reason this is important is that the Neocons are still running the show, lie about everything, and are in complete control of Europe, and are moving to achieve their ultimate goal – the total destruction of Russia, which is not fulfilling Ukraine’s ethnic cleansing of all Russians.

Neocon 1

Conclusion

Neoconservatives see Russia as an ideological and strategic enemy that must be defeated rather than negotiated with. Their influence ensures hardline policies persist, even when they risk unintended consequences. They never consider the people they send into battle. They never consider the national debt or that no nation has ever benefited from prolonged war. They lie about absolutely everything and always claim that their enemy will attack, so they need to attack first using proxies like Ukraine or Vietnam.

Cuban Missile Crisis

They started Ukraine right on schedule – 51.6 years from the Cuban Missile Crisis. The next 8.6-year wave targeted 2022, which peaks in 2027. Russia came to the rescue of the Donbas in 2022.

Deputy AG Todd Blanche Interviews Ghislaine Maxwell for Five Hours


Posted originally on CTH on July 24, 2025 | Sundance 

Deputy Attorney General Todd Blanche flew to Tallahassee, Florida and interviewed former Epstein aide Ghislaine Maxwell for five hours.

WASHINGTON (AP) — The Justice Department’s No. 2 official met Thursday with Ghislaine Maxwell, the imprisoned former girlfriend of financier and convicted sex offender Jeffrey Epstein.

The meeting in Florida, which Deputy Attorney General Todd Blanche said he worked to arrange, is part of an ongoing Justice Department effort to cast itself as transparent following fierce backlash from parts of President Donald Trump’s base over an earlier refusal to release additional records in the Epstein investigation.

“Ms. Maxwell answered every single question. She never stopped, she never invoked a privilege, she never declined to answer. She answered all the questions truthfully, honestly and to the best of her ability,” attorney David Oscar Markus told reporters outside the federal courthouse in Tallahassee, where Maxwell met with Blanche.

In a social media post Tuesday, Blanche said that Trump “has told us to release all credible evidence” and that if Maxwell has information about anyone who has committed crimes against victims, the FBI and the Justice Department “will hear what she has to say.” (read more)

Absolutely Not – Senators Graham and Cornyn Ask DOJ to Appoint Special Counsel to Investigate President Obama and Intelligence Weaponization Against Trump


Posted originally on CTH on July 24, 2025 | Sundance 

 ~Understanding Silos 101~

Senator Lindsey Graham (Judiciary Committee) and Senator John Cornyn (SSCI) are requesting Attorney General Pam Bondi to appoint a special counsel to look into the Obama administration’s weaponization of the U.S. Intelligence Community to target Donald Trump with fabricated smears and false evidence using a fraudulent Russia connection.

This should be an immediate hard no for a few reasons.  Number one, the special counsel process is where investigations go to die intentionally as a design of the legislative branch defense process.  Second, the special counsel would not have cross-silo access to exfiltrate information unless it was accompanied by very specific Presidential authority.  It just will not work.

[SOURCE]

The intelligence community information that exposes the plot will be found in very distinct ‘silos’, essentially the intelligence agencies that house the information.  Additionally, inside each of the silos there is a formal and informal process to designate that information based on its internally defined national security value.

An example of silo retention can be found in the issue of the FBI housing information in “prohibited access” files.  These files are not even discoverable by most internal search efforts.

Within the Sentinel system there are “Restricted Access” files that are used to control who can view the file information (sources and methods etc.).  The FBI or investigative official (think authorized special counsel) can see the file but cannot access the information within it without a higher clearance level.  In these files the Special Counsel can request access and then review.  However, recently people discovered there are “Prohibited Access” files that makes the file invisible to both outside and inside searches or queries and are exclusively controlled by the FBI Director and FBI Deputy Director.

This is an example of a sub-silo (secret file keeping) within a distinct silo (FBI, Sentinel system).  A special counsel would never discover the “prohibited” files, because there’s no way from outside the system to find it.

It’s a little complicated but DNI Tulsi Gabbard has been finding, declassifying and releasing these ‘prohibited access’ types of information, because as Director of National Intelligence -her clearance and position- allow her to gain full administrative level access to the entire metadata of IC information.

Tulsi can essentially log into all of the 18 intelligence agencies and review everything in the data storage system.  A special counsel, regardless of authority, cannot do this.  President Trump can demand full administrative access for himself and so can DNI Tulsi Gabbard.  The rest of the silo administrators can only see the information inside their silo.

This limited access issue is how the intelligence agencies hide information.  They rely on the inability of external reviewers to see the full scope and then cross reference to all other silos using the same terminology, data points and search sequences.

EXAMPLE – Making up an operational name like “Zero Footprint“, when DNI Tulsi Gabbard is looking at that operation, she can see the full scope of information related to Zero Footprint as the information goes from the White House (finding memo) to the CIA, to the State Dept, to the Pentagon, to the Defense Intelligence Agency (DIA), possibly to the Joint Chiefs and then beyond to international partners (whole or part information shared).  DNI Gabbard can see the entire continuum, cross reference each step in the process, see who handled the organization, communication, logistics, assignments and track each process, which enables her to map the inputs and outcomes along with the timeline.  She can even see the briefings (or lack therein) to the Gang of Eight or PDB as they are recorded.

A special counsel has nowhere near this capacity.

In the example above, the research required to find, extract, cross-reference, organize and then assemble the totality of all information related to such a large intelligence operation (fyi, Zero Footprint was real), takes a lot of time and effort.  Tulsi Gabbard is able to designate very specific aides to assist in this process, but the demand on her time is extreme even with help.

DNI Gabbard recently told Fox News (video below) she was/is using AI as a tool to do autonomous spider crawls through the various silos looking for information that pertained to specific points, phrases, times, dates and people within the 18-agency silo system.  Hundreds of thousands of “return positive” files must then be sifted and reviewed for connection to the participants, and again timelines become the key.  This is a big shift in the use of AI data search engine capability within the national security information space; however, it is exactly what I have been talking about for the past several years as I traveled back and forth to DC.

Now, keep in mind what I am describing above is “non-public” information.  If you want to really understand the insanity of how the silos operate, you need to accept the same filing and hiding system exists even within public information.   The congressional staff don’t even know what the other congressional staff are doing with information from within two different committees, like the Senate Judiciary Committee (FISC oversight) and the Senate Homeland Security Committee (DOJ-NSD), or Senate Select Committee on Intelligence (FBI – Cointel).

In essence, there is little to no information sharing within the silo process, even within the guys on the “same team,” and making matters worse sometimes a research team can gain information that is much more pertinent to the other guys looking at similar issues from within another silo.  Discovering this is beyond frustrating; however, it does explain how independent researchers who share on open-source crowd sharing platforms can walk down a research trail much faster.

Bottom line, a Special Counsel is an exercise in futility, unless that special counsel has the same review and extraction capability as President Trump and/or DNI Tulsi Gabbard.

The best option is a team of investigators within Tulsi Gabbard’s office to continue the digging and connecting the information; then share the discoveries with DOJ officials.  Previously, I said a small group within the National Security Council might also be able to deliver a similar outcome.

Lastly, a tip-line allowing the private sector crowdsourcing to push puzzle pieces toward the research team might also be a big help.

Karoline Leavitt Blasts CNN’s Kaitlan Collins for Trying to Smear Tulsi Gabbard


Posted originally on Rumble on Bright Bart News Network on: July 23, 2025

Tulsi: Obama Has “Undermined” the Integrity of Our Republic


Posted originally on Rumble on Bright Bart News Network on: July 23, 2025

Episode 4652: Guilty Of Treason; Rebuilding The AI Industry By Putting The American People First


Posted originally on Rumble By Bannon’s War Room on: July 23, 2025

Senator Johnson: “Democrats Are Doing Everything They Can To Sabotage This Administration.”


Posted originally on Rumble By Bannon’s War Room on: July 23, 2025

DAVIS: Democrat Activist Judges Are Voting President Trump’s U.S. Attorneys Out Of Office


Posted originally on Rumble By Bannon’s War Room on: July 23, 2025

“Obama Directed It All.” John Solomon Reveals Intel Knew Steele Dossier Was Fake By December 2016


Posted originally on Rumble By Bannon’s War Room on: July 23, 2025

DOJ Announces Formation of “Strike Force to Assess ODNI Evidence” Against Former Intel Officials


Posted originally on CTH on July 23, 2025 | Sundance 

Main Justice has announced the formation of a DOJ strike force to assemble and assess the evidence provided by Director of National Intelligence, Tulsi Gabbard, against former intelligence and government officials.

This will require the DOJ to take a new approach, extracting information from multiple silos and then overlaying context to the content therein.

That’s essentially the new approach that DNI Gabbard has taken to break down the silo defenses, and this is the first time since I’ve been outlining how they self-protect that someone (DNI) has actually done the extracting and cross-referencing.

Dept of Justice – WASHINGTON – Today, the Department of Justice announced the formation of a Strike Force to assess the evidence publicized by Director of National Intelligence Tulsi Gabbard and investigate potential next legal steps which might stem from DNI Gabbard’s disclosures.

This Department takes alleged weaponization of the intelligence community with the utmost seriousness.

Upon the formation of the Strike Force, Attorney General Pamela Bondi stated:

“The Department of Justice is proud to work with my friend Director Gabbard and we are grateful for her partnership in delivering accountability for the American people. We will investigate these troubling disclosures fully and leave no stone unturned to deliver justice.” (LINK)

Don’t underestimate how radical and challenging this type of an approach is going to be.

OIG Michael Horowitz never could attempt it (not authorized), SC John Durham was not permitted to do it (not authorized); the House Select Sub-Committee on Govt Weaponization ran away with hair on fire at even the suggestion of doing it (ask me how I know), and no modern internal investigative unit has ever been allowed to extract national security information from multiple IC institutions, and review it in context.

The DC intel silos are built so their lack of sharing creates a natural defense mechanism; there is no cross-reference capability.  DNI Tulsi Gabbard has the unique ability -due to her position- of reaching into each IC silo regardless of their effort to stop her.  That’s what has led to this point.

If the DOJ is successful, things could change; but that’s a very big ‘if’.

The entire mechanism of the USIC, led by defenses from the Senate Intel Committee (Cotton), will do everything to stop any internal extraction and review of their silo information.  “National security” claims will run rampant.  This will be a heavy lift requiring Executive Office support and coordination at every level.

If you want to understand how difficult this type of thing is, listen to this: