Unrestricted Abortions under Kamala is Improbable


Posted originally on Nov 5, 2024 By Martin Armstrong |  

For the one-issue voters honing in on abortion – do you know that the president does not have the power to overturn the Supreme Court ruling? Abortion is now in the hands of individual states. Kamala Harris has promised to codify Roe v Wade into the US Constitution, but it’s not possible at this time.

Harris would need the full support of both chambers of Congress. She knows that she could never secure enough votes which is why she would like to eliminate the Senate filibuster to allow legislation to pass with a majority of 51 votes instead of 60. There are people on both sides who do not agree with ending the filibuster for various reasons.

Harris would need to end the Hyde Amendment that restricts Medicaid coverage for abortions. Low-income individuals are more prone to seek out abortion services. She would likely need Congress to approve funding for abortion services, as the federal government already funds Planned Parenthood.

Abortion Protests

Restricting state-level bans would also need to happen. The Bible Belt will ensure that their states have separate legislation in their state Constitutions that Harris would need to override.

Then, whatever is passed is simply not enough. For example, on our local ballot in Florida, they would like minors to have access to abortions without parental authorization. Children are unable to undergo medical procedures without parental authorization, but the far-left believes they have the ability to choose whether it’s right to terminate a pregnancy or switch their gender. Roe technically applies to 22 to 24 weeks of pregnancy, but individual journalists have shown that countless agencies have no problem performing abortions well into the third trimester.

Kamala Harris pledges to implement unrestricted abortion within her first 100 days of office. There is absolutely no way she could accomplish all of the above within a few months. It is simply not possible to mobilize public support for such a polarizing measure.

UK – Lowest Fertility Rate in G7


Posted Oct 29, 2024 By Martin Armstrong 

Decline in Birthrate

Birth rates are plummeting across the world — America, Canada, South Korea, Singapore, Taiwan, Italy, Japan, Russia, and now England and Wales. Nearly every developed country has seen a large decline in the fertility rate as a direct result of economics. People simply cannot afford the costs associated with raising children and it is slowly changing civilization. England and Wales recently reported the lowest fertility on record since it began collecting data in 1938. Fertility rates in the UK are falling faster than any other G7 nation.

The total fertility rate (TFR) fell to 1.44 per woman in 2023 compared to 1.49 in 2022, marking the lowest on record since the Office for National Statistics (ONS) began collecting data. There were 591,072 new births recorded last year but that is the lowest figure since 1977. The ONS stated that “natural” population replacement may only occur when women have a fertility rate of 2.1 children.

Fertility rates across the world are plummeting but individual nations are seeing their populations explode as a direct result of immigration. In fact, the number of migrants entering the UK far surpasses the birth rate, with an estimated 685,000 migrants entering the UK in 2023.

We are witnessing population replacement at play. Birth rates are declining across developed nations among the citizens who can no longer afford to expand their families. On the other hand, these nations opened their borders and provided free shelter, healthcare, etc., to migrants who are comfortably expanding their families. In the UK, we are witnessing a  Christian nation being replaced with Islamic views and ideals as most migrants arrive from the Middle East, and their culture encourages having larger families. We are witnessing a shift in society as the current citizens are being phased out and replaced by newcomers.

New Polling: Amid all National Civic and Political Institutions U.S. News Media are Least Trusted


Posted originally on the CTH on October 16, 2024 | Sundance

It should not come as a surprise given the volume of examples that have been presented in the last several years; however, according to Gallup polling, amid all the top national civic and political institutions the United States “news media” is now the least trusted institution of all.

[Citation]

The alarming statistic is really that -post COVID- 31% of Americans still trusts news media.  I would surmise that if a similar poll was done on professions, teachers, nurses and healthcare workers would also be at the lower end of the scale.

That said, this really is not a surprise if you have ever interacted at a high level outside the USA.  Internationally, thanks in part to the traveling USA press corps who have showcased their ideological attributes to a host of foreign audiences, the entire world now view the USA media apparatus as various shades of something akin to Baghdad Bob.

If you think that a cognitively compromised USA President parading around the world as a blithering fool, while the USA media openly pretended he was functional, does not have some significant impact on global views, you are mistaken.  The entire world sees Joe Biden as he is, not as the media pretended him to be.

James Rickards Tears Through The Democrats’ Jobs Lies


Posted originally on Rumble By Bannons War Room on: Oct 11, 2024 at 1:00 pm EST

Kristi Hamrick On Abortion: “This Is Not Empowerment, It’s A National Tragedy”


Posted originally on Rumble By Bannons War Room on: Sep 30, 2024 at 07:00 pm EST

What These People Have Done To Cheapen What It Means To Be An American Citizen Is So Disgusting


Posted originally on Rumble By Bannons War Room on: Sep 28, 2024 at 01:30 pm EST

Sean Combs’ Body Guard Claims Music Mogul Kept Tapes of New York Politicians at Sex Parties


Posted originally on the CTH on September 24, 2024 | Sundance

Something seriously corrupt has been happening inside New York City politics ever since the FBI seized the phones and personal communication networks of City Mayor Eric Adams. In the past several months, multiple political officials have resigned or departed from their jobs.

Keep in mind, the lead agency doing the investigative review is the FBI. According to ABC news, “Federal investigators have visited more than a dozen members of his administration, taking devices from the police commissioner (who then resigned), the head of the public schools and other trusted confidantes both in and out of City Hall.”  For whatever reason, the FBI are zeroed in on Mayor Eric Adams and those around him.

Into this sketchy and opaque situation in New York, comes a report on the heels of the FBI targeting Sean “Diddy” Combs for Epstein level sex trafficking, wire fraud, racketeering, transportation to engage in prostitution, perverse parties called “freak offs” and various other sick and twisted perversions.

(Daily Mail) – […] Sean ‘Diddy’ Combs’ former bodyguard revealed the disgraced rap mogul kept tapes of politicians taking part in his infamous ‘freak off’ sessions, and claimed his arrest is tied to an alleged corruption scandal currently gripping New York City politics.

Gene Deal, a former insider who protected Diddy through the 1990s, told The Art of Dialogue podcast that the producer’s indictment could expose high-profile officials and celebrities in the Big Apple.

‘This is all bigger than Diddy,’ he said, without naming who the alleged tapes are of. (read more)

It’s enough to make you wonder if the two points of FBI focus (Mayor Adams’ administration & Sean Combs) are connected?

If there is any issue related to Sean Combs that represents a risk to high-profile celebrity democrats (likely), the presence of the FBI would be to protect the interests of the political leverage the connection represents.

In historically accurate terms, the FBI would be covering, controlling, shaping and mitigating the risk in favor of those most politically useful to the government.  Those of lesser value would be left exposed to the legal consequences of their perversions.

Is that part of what’s happening in New York City?

The End of Sanctuary Cities


Posted originally on Sep 24, 2024 By Martin Armstrong 

MigrantCrisis

Donald Trump has vowed to put a halt to the invasion of America if re-elected. First and foremost, US politicians must stop enticing people to travel to America to seek sanctuary. “I’m announcing a new plan to end all sanctuary cities in North Carolina and all across our country,” Trump announced at a recent rally.

“We will send them home where they belong,” he said. “I will ask Congress to pass a law outlawing sanctuary cities nationwide, and we will bring down the full weight of the federal government on any jurisdiction that refuses to cooperate with ICE,” Trump said on sanctuary cities.

Migrants.ObamavAdams

This is crucial as immigration must be blanketed as a federal concern. We cannot have certain states or cities enticing foreigners to travel there by any means necessary and then using federal funds to support their work-free lives. Any politician who actively aids in the invasion of America should be charged with obstruction of justice at a minimum. Trump has called Kamala Harris the “invasion president” as she proudly encouraged tens of millions of unvetted migrants to enter America AND has no plan to curtail the new arrivals.

ViLook at the tragic case of 22-year-old Laken Riley, a student who was brutally murdered by a migrant. US Customs and Border Protection arrested the Venezuelan migrant in September 2022. He was quickly released and sent on a bus to the sanctuary city of New York. A year later, the NYPD arrested him for endangering the life of his own son. Immigration and Customs Enforcement (ICE) did not step in, and the sanctuary city placed the safety of the migrant criminal before its own citizens – he was shortly released for the second time. A month later, he was arrested for stealing from a Walmart in Athens, GA, another sanctuary city, but again, he faced no consequences. The system emboldened him to commit increasingly heinous crimes, as there are simply no consequences for migrants. He and his extended family were enjoying a taxpayer-subsidized life. The coward was likely surprised that he was charged with raping and murdering Laken Riley, as the politicization of migrants has become more important than national security.

What did President Joe Biden do? He apologized for calling the murderer an “illegal” instead of a “migrant” and refused to acknowledge Laken Riley’s family for months.

MigrantCaravan

Riley is one of hundreds if not thousands of innocent citizens who have fallen victim to migrant crime. The Democrat-run cities refuse to prosecute these criminals all for political circus.

Crime is half of the problem. These sanctuary cities are deeply in debt. They have nowhere to house these migrants. Hospitals have been overrun. Contracts to house and feed these people indefinitely have become utterly corrupt, with third parties securing lucrative deals with the city to spend more on migrants than the average working American would spend on themselves.

ViMigration MUST be a federal issue. The Guarantee Clause in Article IV, Section 4 obligates the federal government to protect states from invasion but the Constitution has been utterly ignored under Biden-Harris.

"The United States shall guarantee to every State in this Union a Republican Form of Government, and shall protect each of them against Invasion"

America – We Have a Problem


Posted originally on Sep 21, 2024 By Martin Armstrong 

  

America, we have a problem. The confidence in the government is collapsing. The computer has been projecting this into 2032, and either side will NEVER accept this election here in 2024, and it may be the very last. The Feds are blocking DeSantis and any independent investigation into the second assassination attempt of Donald Trump. More than 60 years have passed, and we still do not have the release of the files regarding the assassination of JFK.

This behavior by the FBI when the Department of Justice (JUST US) has been prosecuting Trump and is behind the state cases in New York and Georgia is a conflict of interest that history will NEVER accept and will most likely be looked back upon as one of the reasons for the post-election violence that our computer is projecting and the ultimate demise of the United States.

Here is another video. Why is Jesse Watters the ONLY one asking these questions in the press? Have they been instructed to look the other way? These are very good questions that need to be investigated and answered. However, the Feds appear to be determined to control the narrative, as always.

VRouth’s motives will NEVER be explained – that’s just part of the game. His extensive online history shows he was a staunch advocate of Ukraine and Taiwan, and at least that would support the Neocons who are scared to death of a Trump victory. Trump and RFK are anti-war. The Feds are charging him with two federal gun crimes to start with. He will appear in court for a detention hearing on Monday.

Epstein Ornament

On July 25th, 2019, I wrote that based upon where they put Epstein inside MCC on 9 South, the hole, it was clear he would not survive. I wrote: “When will Epstein be found Dead? Before or After a Deal?” Look, they NEVER charge any of the New York Bankers with crimes. The bank will pay 10%-20% of their profit on an illegal manipulation as a fine – which is really just the SEC’s cut for looking the other way. There will NEVER be a trial in this case as there is in any such case that might expose the behind-the-curtain machinations, just as in the JFK shooting. Go down the list. You will NEVER see a public trial where dirt would surface.

Republic Pays 606 WSJ

The banks claimed they had no idea about the Madoff case, as they did about mine. The bank was forced to plead guilty and return the money they stole from my clients only because my clients supported me and I instructed them to sue the bank. My clients were all the top major public corporations in Japan, so they could not be swept under the carpet. The bank first claimed they had no idea where the money was.

Madoff Banks had to have Known

Madoff pleaded guilty to just a complaint to protect his family. He could have pleaded not guilty, and it would have been at least a two—to three-year investigation and the trial of the century. The banks claimed they had no idea. It is IMPOSSIBLE for you to have know-your-client rules. Then Madoff did do an interview before he died and stated the banks knew – they always know.

A Journalist from one of the New York papers called me and asked if the bank was illegally trading in my accounts to launder money for the Russian Mafia. I said I did not know because all the claimed errors would be money laundering if they put the “error” in my account but took it out using another. The forensic Accountant said they had never seen so many errors. That journalist never published the story. We will not see a trial in this attempted assassination either.

FCI Letter 2007

Cartel-Occupied Condos In Colorado Are Being Used For Parties With Drugs And Child-Prostitutes


Posted originally on Rumble By Bannons War Room on: Sep 13, 2024 at 09:00 pm EST