Climate Clock Elected in NYC To Further Propaganda


As part of this Climate Week in New York intended to influence the US elections against Trump, they have created a clock to countdown the time remaining before we all die and it is too late to reverse climate change as if there is anything we could do to actually alter cycles that have existed for thousands if not millions of years. This latest propaganda is being organized to further the surrender of the sovereignty of individual nations and hand it to the United Nations because we now need a one-world government to save the planet and prevent COVID-19 from killing everyone.

On Saturday, at 3:20 p.m., the clock suddenly said: “The Earth has a deadline” which was followed by the numbers — 7:103:15:40:07. They are trying to brainwash the weak-minded into another state of fear claiming we now have just 7 years, 103 days, 15 hours, 40 minutes, and just 7 seconds until we die.

There have been so many such predictions it is laughable. In 1932, they claimed the very same scenario that the Glaciers would melt and the water would rise to 15th floor in New York City.

Just in 2007 they were saying “ALL” Artic Ice will be gone by 2012. I think it is still there. Al Gore’s “armageddon” expired in 2016, with nothing taking place. Back in January 2006, when promoting his film “An Inconvenient Truth,” Gore declared that unless we took “drastic measures” to reduce our greenhouse gas emissions, the world would reach a “point of no return” in a mere ten years. He called it a “true planetary emergency.” Well, the ten years passed in 2016, and we’re still here. The winters have been getting colder, and the climate activists have postponed the apocalypse, always extending it in a desperate attempt to cling to their failed forecasts. A whole cottage industry has developed to catalog all the failed forecasts of the global warming/climate change alarmists.  In fact, Gore’s movie was challenged in the courts in London and the Judge found that it was opinion and there were 9 major errors in the claims of the film.

Nevertheless, truth no longer matters. COVID-19 has been used to destroy the world economy to crush it into submission to end fossil fuels to creat Klaus Schwab’s Great Reset and further the Marxist agenda being put out by the World Economic Forum. These global elitists think they can redesign the world economy to fit their vision the very same as Karl Marx. Hence, this clock now claiming we have 7 years left is the same old story they keep revising the date because nothing every took place. This time, the need to defeat Trump to further their designs of elevating the United Nations to a one-world dominant government.

Netflix’s Leftist Cuties


Like the Clintons, the Obamas have amassed a considerable fortune from politics. Also like the Clintons, they’re not going away. They continue to have an influence over politics and American culture. By becoming Netflix producers, the Obamas made sure their leftist propaganda gets attention.

Neither Michelle nor Barack have said anything about the Netflix program titled “Cuties,” in which young girls are shown in sexually charged poses on a glitzy stage. Susan Rice, a former Obama advisor, is on the Netflix board. She has also been reticent about what many are calling ‘pedophilia.’ Some say their silence is complicity. I agree.

Under Obama’s administration, the ‘trans’ mania began. Boys at high schools could pretend they were girls and win awards in athletic events. Restrooms suddenly became a problem. Then came the claim that there were dozens of genders and various sexual identifications. Anyone who objected got labeled as haters. Eventually, people became fearful. If they used the wrong pronoun or offended an easily offended trans-whatever, they could be fired, banned, or expelled.

I don’t know if Michelle Obama is a transgender or not. The matter is a long-running internet meme. That meme was reinforced when Joan Rivers casually said Michelle was a ‘tranny’ and that it was ‘okay.’ Days later she was dead. Maybe it was okay to her, but not to other powerful people who wanted to keep it under wraps. Even Barack himself has referred to Michelle as “Michael” on several occasions. There have been many who have said Barack Obama is gay. It’s plausible, but such speculation can also easily lead to social media bans.

Now the lying mass media are denouncing Q and his followers. They ridicule those who think there is such as thing as child trafficking and pedophilia occurring among the elite and powerful. Anyone who claims there are plenty of pedophiles pulling top levers of power must obviously be a conspiracy theorist, according to CNN, MSNBC, and all the rest. Yet a lot of evidence does exist. Epstein’s “Orgy Island,” for example.

The fact that the Obamas did not exert influence to stop a show containing obvious pedophilia can only mean they are complicit. Perhaps they want pedophilia to be normalized just as they wanted sexual dysphoria normalized. Meanwhile, they and their colleagues are doing their best to shut down Christians who object.

—Ben Garrison

Election 2020: Like 2016, To Be ‘The Election That Never Was’


Dems Not Going to Count Your Trump Vote:

Judi McLeod image

Re-Posted from the Canada Free Press By  —— Bio and ArchivesSeptember 21, 2020

Election 2020: Like 2016, To Be ‘The Election That Never Was’

Get ready for Election 2020 doomed to go down in history as “the election that never was”.

The main reason for the election that will be called the one that never was is that the outcome of a Trump victory will NEVER be allowed to happen.

Even before voters get to cast their ballots, power-crazed Democrats are already claiming that incumbent President Donald Trump cannot possibly win the election—but can only “steal” it.

Bottom line: Democrats know that Trump is going to win, but are poised to deny him that right

Bottom line: Democrats know that Trump is going to win, but are poised to deny him that right.

Their collective deranged denial that the Russians stole the election from them in 2016 still stands in defiance of the reality of the Donald Trump hands-down victory and is coming back in 2020 as:“the only way Trump can win the election is to “steal the election.”

Last time it was demented celebrities turning out in pink pussy cap headgear for a one-million-strong women and feminized men screech fest march.

Now it’s billionaire bully George Soros’ money funding a massive network of left-wing activists and progressive groups to hit the streets in outright anarchy the first day after Election.

For millions of Americans, now made a convenient captive audience, courtesy of the 7-month-long lockdown that followed the pandemic, and millions more in other countries who depend on America for financial survival,  it will be like watching a horrific Hollywood movie where the entire world is driven mad.

There will be no way out for the masses who will be left like flies trapped in a tightly capped bottle by their captors.

Soros and Company, who plan on stealing the election, but blaming it on President Trump, will show no mercy.

Related:
Prosecute George Soros for Plotting Anarchy,  Violating U.S. Code § 2383. Rebellion or Insurrection
EXPOSE HIM: Here’s how George Soros is funding today’s riots & chaos

Republican pundit Newt Gingrich was suppressed by a Fox News

“Under the guise of seeking to “prevent a constitutional crisis,” a massive network of well funded left-wing activists and progressive groups are training, organizing, and planning to mobilize millions of Americans should President Trump “contest the election results,” refuse to concede, or claim an early victory.” (Breitbart, Sept. 17, 2020)

Breitbart is one of the multiple conservative outlets whose message is suppressed by social media, including mighty Google.

But don’t wait for ‘Fair and Balanced’ Fox News, which, for reasons unknown, seem to have jumped into the George Soros tank, to come to the rescue.

Republican pundit Newt Gingrich was suppressed by a Fox News host and a former CIA spokesman when he tried to bring up the undisputed fact that George Soros funded candidates for prosecutors in riot-struck cities.

“The number one problem in almost all the cities is George Soros-elected, left-wing, anti-police, pro-criminal district attorneys who refuse to keep people locked up,” Gingrich told the hosts of ‘Outnumbered’ on Fox News on Wednesday.

“Both {Kamala} Harris and {Joe} Biden have talked very proudly about what they call progressive district attorneys,” he continued. “Progressive district attorneys are anti-police, pro-criminal, and overwhelmingly elected with George Soros’ money. They are a major cause of the violence we are seeing because they keep putting the violent criminals back on the street.”

He was immediately muzzled by panelist Melissa Francis – who hosts her own show on Fox Business – saying “I’m not sure we need to bring George Soros into this.”

Fellow panelist Marie Harf – who was a spokeswoman for the CIA and the State Department during the Obama administration – joined in, arguing that “George Soros doesn’t need to be part of this conversation.”

“Okay, so it’s verboten?” Gingrich said, incredulous. After a long moment of 14 seconds of awkward silence, host Harris Faulkner simply said “Okay, we’re going to move on.”

“Move on?”

Move on to where Fox News?

The sad truth, unreported by mainstream and social media is that between 2014 and 2018, Soros spent more than $16 million on 17 district attorney races across the US, with his candidates winning 13 of them. In 2018 alone, Soros spent more than $2.7 million on district attorney races in California, according to the Los Angeles Times.

But an even more deadly current truth is that more than 80 “advocacy” groups and “grassroots” organizations have joined a hideous broad coalition calling itself “Protect the Results”.

They piously proclaim they are only ganging up because “we cannot ignore the threat that Trump poses to our democracy and a peaceful transition of power.”

This is all being done—before Trump wins as a way to keep him from winning—after he does!

“The coalition is a joint project of Indivisible and Stand Up America, two left-wing groups founded in response to President Trump’s 2016 election and whose goals are “to organize and resist Trump’s dangerous agenda” and “to defeat Trump and his enablers.” (Breitbart)

“Seeking to “protect” election results by use of its millions of members, the coalition calls to “take coordinated action” and “prepare for a potential post-election crisis.”

“Be prepared,” warns a video on its homepage.

“Both founding groups of the coalition (Indivisible and Stand up America) are part of the Soros-funded Democracy Alliance (DA), the largest network of donors dedicated to building the progressive movement in the U.S.

“DA’s large body of donors aggregates resources for “focused investment,” marshalling as much as $80 million per year.

“Other Soros-funded coalition groups include MoveOn, Women’s March, the Working Families Party and the Center for Popular Democracy, a network with over 50 local partners in 32 states, among many others.

“Having likened President Trump to a dictator, left-wing billionaire George Soros declared in a recent interview that Trump is dangerous, is “fighting” for his political life, and will do “anything to remain in power.”

Fight ELITIST SUPPRESSION—Make CFP Your Go-To Home Page!

“If Soros can’t be exposed on Fox News, where else, in the today’s state of an unaccountable media, can he be exposed?”

“If Trump wants to ignore the will of the people and fight over election results, it’s a fight he’ll get,” said Nelini Stamp, Director of Strategy and Partnerships at the Working Families Party.

“Our resistance is key in protecting the outcome of this election,” said Arisha Michelle Hatch, Executive Director of Color Of Change PAC. “We will mobilize to safeguard Black people from the chaos and pain that will inevitably ensue should Trump choose to disregard reality in November.”

Nowhere in the mainstream or social media is it ever reported that it is not Trump who will “choose to disregard reality in November”—but the Democrats and their Soros surrogates who have been stubbornly denying reality since the 2016 election.

Meanwhile, after seeing how Fox News cut off Newt Gingrich for trying to expose George Soros on Wednesday, we should all be asking, “If Soros can’t be exposed on Fox News, where else, in the today’s state of an unaccountable media, can he be exposed?”

The End of 200+ Years of the US Constitution or the Beginnings of Renewed Liberty?


Returning the USA to its rightful position as a Constitutional Republic

Sher Zieve image

Re-Posted from the Canada Free Press By  —— Bio and ArchivesSeptember 21, 2020

The End of 200+ Years of the US Constitution or the Beginnings of Renewed Liberty?

The United States of America was established July 4, 1776…244 years ago.  Today—September 21, 2020—there is a possibility that it may end—as founded—on November 3, 2020 or shortly thereafter.

The upcoming election will—no more and no less—determine whether or not the USA will remain as a strong and credible world power, be restored to its Constitutional-Republic governance, adhere to the Bill of Rights and retain consent of the governed via its ideology of individual sovereignty; that is the people control the politicians…not the other way around.

Free Speech now includes the “right” to tear down statues, burn cars, privately-owned buildings, wantonly loot privately-owned stores, beat up and even murder individuals

For many years, now, the USA’s laws have suffered erosion; from its government’s allowances of killing babies in the womb, Democrat Party-run States passing laws to weaken the Bill of Rights’ Second Amendment via the addition of myriad restrictions to gun ownership and in today’s current “social” (a definitive misnomer) environment and weakening the First Amendment by companies’ disallowing conservative beliefs and speech to appear on the various “Social media” platforms.  Note:  Other Amendments to the US Constitution are also being attacked but, although one may disagree, I consider the preceding to be the most egregious.

In Democrat-run States, Free Speech now includes the “right” to tear down statues, burn cars and privately-owned buildings—even entire sections of cities—wantonly loot privately-owned stores, beat up and even murder individuals who don’t agree with movements like ‘Black Lives Matter’ and ‘Antifa’ who call all those who disagree with their destructive—even annihilative—actions fascists in foolish attempts to disguise the fact that they are the true fascists.  Note:  Despite the fact that the president of the United States has called on the Democrat-run cities and States to allow federal troops in to help, except for one or two his aid has been rejected.  With the Democrat leaders’ rejections, the chaos has not only been allowed to continue…it has been encouraged by said leaders.  One of the ‘encouragements’ is that the looters and pillagers are immediately bonded out of jail via funds that presidential candidate Joe Biden’s VP pick Kamala Harris both supports and applauds!

As US citizens we, currently, find ourselves in the position of a national election for the US presidency, the House of Representatives and the Senate on November 3.  Throughout the last year, we have seen the planned and activated chaotic movement spread throughout the US cities…with threats from rioters that they will “come to the suburbs and begin burning them down.”  They are also demanding that White people give them their homes.

The choices for US president, and Congressional representation in both its upper and lower chambers could not be more diametrically opposed.  The Democrats have chosen to end our Constitution and country as founded and replace it with a Marxist government ruled by the few and the Republicans under the exceptional governance of President Donald J. Trump who—during his current tenure—has worked diligently to restore the concept of US Constitutional liberties that have been denigrated over decades of corrupt leadership.  And, if we do not retake the House of Reps, we will continue impeachment after impeachment attempts.  Speaker Pelosi has already said she wants to impeach President Trump for his plan to begin the nomination procedures for a new SCOTUS Associate Justice.  This nomination is not his prerogative but, is mandated as one of his sacred duties in Article II of the US Constitution.  If we do not maintain the Senate—despite the RINOs contained therein—we will have no chance of completing the job President Trump has begun; that of returning the USA to its rightful position as a Constitutional Republic.

As I see it…those are our choices.  Please vote…and, if possible, in person.  And, pray my friends.  These are the foretold times.  We need our God more than ever, now.

“When the righteous are in authority, the people rejoice; but when a wicked man rules, the people groan”—Proverbs 29:2

Related:
BLM ‘activists’ celebrated as Trump supporter was killed:
They say Black lives matter…How left-wing chaos kills kids:
Biden VP pick Harris promoted group that put up bail for alleged violent criminals:
Groups like Antifa and Black Lives Matter are trying to destroy America from the inside. It’s working:
Seattle BLM protesters demand white people ‘give up’ their homes | New York Post (Video):

 

Klaus Schwab & His Great Reset – Unrealistic Academic Proposal as Dangerous as Marxism


Klaus Schwab needs to answer why the World Economic Forum sold all its stocks and bonds ahead of everyone else. Schwab has exploited this virus within weeks, launching his vision for the Great Reset. This highly likely man-made virus was also highly likely to have been leaked in China deliberately by another group with a personal agenda involving climate change. They have succeeded in shutting down the world economy, increasing the world oil reserves by three years, and destroying over 300 million jobs as collateral damage. We have been subjected to fear tactics used even by the Nazis to gain power. This has been a huge corporate propaganda agenda to reduce the population to sheep.

Schwab’s book, “Covid-19: The Great Reset,” is clearly propaganda because they are handing it out for free on kindle.  Schwab has no idea how to reconstruct the economy. There was the first Great Depression, which lasted for 26 years during the 19th century. That event was named the “Long Depression” after the 1930s crash, which became known as the “Great Depression.” Both involved a paradigm shift where the first followed the introduction of the railroads, which then displaced many jobs involving horses and carts. The next Great Depression saw the collapse in agriculture, which had employed 40% of the civil workforce at the turn of the 20th century. With the invention of the combustion engine and tractors, this reduced the need for manual labor. Then the Dust Bowl hit driving unemployment to 25%. It took World War II to restore the economy by absorbing the excess agricultural labor and forcing them to become qualified.

Like people in airports handing out leaflets trying to convert you to some cult, Schwab is doing the very same thing. He is counting on the people who are incapable of thinking for themselves and he continues never to address all the evidence against man-made climate change. Nevertheless, welcome to the new paradise where people just follow orders.

Who pays for the damage brought by Black Lives Matter/Antifa?


Question: What American political entity has that relationship to BLM/Antifa? 
Answer: The Democrat National Committee, et. al.  And you might as well sue Mao.

Lee Cary image

Re-Posted from the Conservative Tree house By  —— Bio and ArchivesSeptember 20, 2020

 

Who pays for the damage brought by Black Lives Matter/Antifa?

Three posts from July 23-August 8, from this author, compare China’s Cultural Revolution to Black Lives Matter/Antifa.  The series began with:

“The Chinese Communist Party’s Cultural Revolution (1966-1976) was the precursor to today’s urban protests involving Black Lives Matter (BLM) and Antifa. As America’s Cancel Culture spread into several Big Blue Cities, largely governed by Democrat politicians for decades, city officials stood back and let it happen.” (Links to parts 12, and 3.)

China: During the winter of 1978-79, many victims of the Red Guards’ violence against people and property led to “a spate of highly personalized appeals for redress of grievances written by (or on behalf of) ordinary citizens who had suffered abuse at the hands of Leftists during the Cultural Revolution.’’ (”Burying Mao, Chinese politics in the Age of Deng Xiaoping,” Richard Baum, Princeton University Press, ©1994, p. 76)

Frustrated by long delays in receiving any response from Beijing, “thousands descended upon Beijing personally to press their grievances.  With official channels clogged and response times painfully slow, many petitioners took to the streets, posting handwritten appeals (known as xiaozibao, or ‘small character posters’) at Xidan, Tiananmen, and elsewhere…Most of the petitioners who descended on Beijing were poor, many were in dire straits. Some had traveled long distances on foot, carrying their possessions in knotted bundles; others had hitched rides into the cities on freight trains or trucks…In all, more than 100,000 out-of-towners descended upon Beijing and Shanghai in 1979, hoping to have their cases reopened…Despite government pledges to review all appeals objectively and impartially, many petitioners complained of receiving unfair treatment.” (Baum, p.76)

The Chinese Communist Party (CCP), led by Chairman Mao Zedong, planned and launched the Cultural Revolution.

America: In the wake of the 2007-08 financial failure in America the saying that applied to the big banking institutions was: “Too big to fail.”
In the wake of the damage done by China’s Cultural Revolution, it was: “Too big to blame.”

What will we say when BLM/Antifa is over?

In the wake of the on-going damage to people and private property brought upon many of America’s Big Blue Cities (BBC) at the hands of (1) BLM street posters involving many white, both male and female, virtue-signalers between 17-27 years old, march through residential neighborhoods late at night, stall daytime traffic in downtown areas, and verbally intimidate evening diners in outdoor restaurants, paired up with (2) Antifa thugs dressed in all black who excel at destroying property and beating-up weaker people, we wonder: What will be America’s version of “The Petitioners’ Movement” in post-Cultural Revolution China?  

China: The Petitioner’s Movement happened when Chinese victims of the Red Guard sought redress for damages done to them and their property.  They eventually went to Beijing for redress, because they knew that’s where it all started.

The unspoken mantra for China’s Petitioners’ Movement was, essentially: “We can’t blame any one person, because that would mean blaming Chairman Mao. And he lives above blame.”

America: Can we count on the U.S. Department of Justice to prosecute and, when guilt is proven, punish those in the BLM/Antifa movement who injured persons and damaged private property?

Can we expect the Democrat-elected prosecutors in the BBCs to indict and try those who injured persons, and destroyed property? Perhaps a few—those not elected with Soros money.

So, who will hold those accountable for the carnage that continues to mount-up in the run-up to the General Election, and may escalate after November 3?

China: The CCP led by Mao Zedong gave the green-light to China’s Cultural Revolution.  Then stood back, and watched it unfold assuming a life of its own, free of any one person’s control.

It was to the CCP that many of the Cultural Revolution’s victims petitioned for redress for the physical and material damages they sustained. They knew the source, but prudence meant not saying it out loud.

America: Who will Americans petition for redress for the damages that BLM/Antifa brought into their communities?

Shall claims be directed at the big corporations, foundations, and wealthy individuals who seek to buy virtue by donating big money to the BLM/Antifa Movement? (Operationally, the organizations are two heads of the same snake.)

Should victims of the BLM/Antifa movement petition the U.S. Government for damages?  That would be like suing the United States Postal Service if one of their trucks hits your new car.

Perhaps those insurance companies that pay out tens-of-millions in damages to looted chain stores will consider recouping part of their loss by suits aimed at BLM’s growing financial assets?  But, no, that would tarnish their corporate image by putting the patina of white supremacists on their brand.

That leaves those small, independent businesses that sustained damage to seek redress at the local level. The same local level that let it happen.

Those physically and materially injured by BLM/Antifa may sue their local Blue government for not dispatching their tax-funded Police Departments to bring order to the chaos when it first began, instead of letting it get out of control. Perhaps some of the defunded police money could go to the destroyed small businesses. Or not.

Problem is, more than a few of those municipalities run perilously close to bankruptcy.  (See Chicago and NYC.)

To restate the question: How will America’s version of China’s “Petitioners’ Movement” seek to redress the damages done to persons and property by BLM/Antifa

In short, who pays?

In China, little was done for the victims of the Cultural Revolution. It was born a child of the one-and-only political party, and conceived in the mind of its near deity, Chairman Mao.

Question: What American political entity has that relationship to BLM/Antifa? 

Answer: The Democrat National Committee, et. al.  And you might as well sue Mao.

United Nations Trying to Influence US Election Against Trump


It should come as no surprise that the United Nations is seeking to expand its power to a worldwide government as numerous countries turn to the UN to impose this be Great Reset so they can claim it is not them. The United Nations has scheduled Climate Week NYC which starts tomorrow and is intended to run alongside the UN General Assembly to try to tell the world that Trump has to go to save the planet. They are seeking to intensify the focus on climate change to inject this into the US presidential election. This is exactly what the Democrats accused Russia of doing. This time it is the United Nations-supported by the big Tech companies and Bill Gates with his coconspirator – Klaus Schwab from the World Economic Forum.

Perhaps they will be mugged now that crime is up and they have chased much of the smart wealthy out of New York.

Judge Amy Coney Barrett on the Short-List


Appellate Judge Amy Coney Barrett is at the top of the list for replacements for Justice Ginsberg. Like hydroxychloroquine, simply because Trump nominates her she will be vilified. She is a Catholic and already the Democrats are preparing to tear her apart based on her religions. After graduating from the University of Notre Dame’s law school at the very top of her class. In fact, in 1997, she graduated first in her class, which earned her the Hoynes Prize, the Law School’s highest honor which was very impressive with respect to her thinking process.

Amy then worked as a law clerk for Supreme Court Justice Antonin Scalia who was a strict constructionist. It was Scalia who pushed for reform in the way the courts were treating those charged. The jury was not determining every fact, and Scalia saw this as unconstitutional and argued this position until the rest of the court saw his constitutional argument. Finally, in APPRENDI v. NEW JERSEY No. 99—478. Argued March 28, 2000–Decided June 26, 2000, Scalia defended the citizen’s right to a jury trial which had been eroded by the procedure.

In the Spirit Justice Ginsberg, Amy was the only female law clerk in the Supreme Court at that time. Besides being sitting on the court of appeals, she was also a University of Notre Dame law professor. Ironically, because she has been a dedicated mother of seven, her Catholic faith was turned against her by California Sen. Dianne Feinstein who questioned whether or not she could separate her religious faith from her duty as a judge. “The dogma lives loudly within you,” Feinstein said during the confirmation hearing for the Court of Appeals hearing. Barrett insisted that her professional beliefs and her religious beliefs would be kept separate. Ironically, the right to an abortion is deeply entangled with the right to privacy. In the recent case involving the anti-abortion law in Louisiana(1), even conservative Chief Justice John G. Roberts Jr. struck it down saying that respect for precedent compelled him to do so.

Roe vWade, 410 U.S. 113 (1973), was a landmark decision of the U.S. Supreme Court in which the Court ruled that the Constitution of the United States protects a pregnant woman’s liberty to choose to have an abortion without excessive government restriction. To understand the foundation of Roe v Wade and why it cannot be overturned without jeopardizing our right to privacy in the face of this contrived pandemic is critical. In 1965, the U.S. Supreme Court struck down a law banning the distribution of birth control to married couples, ruling that the law violated their implied right to privacy under the U.S. Constitution, GRISWOLD v. CONNECTICUT, 381 U.S. 479 (1965). How do you enforce that a married couple illegally used a condom during sex? Does an FBI agency have to watch? And in 1972, the Supreme Court struck down a law prohibiting the distribution of contraceptives to unmarried adults. Again, there is no way to enforce such laws without a government agent observing every sexual act.

To overturn Roe v Wade, would mean that the government can order you to take vaccines that violate your religion that even alter your DNA. While I would never condone an abortion personally, my personal belief cannot blind me to support overturning Roe v Wade opening the door to absolute tyranny. To do so would allow someone like Bill Gates to bribe politicians to pass laws to compel women to have Chips inserted to prevent pregnancy. It would be just one tiny step to then compel you to obtain permission from the government to have a child. They could just as easily impose an IQ test and determine you are not qualified to have children. Gates has already funded remote control birth-control by implanting chips into women. He is obsessed with population control.

The US Supreme Court actually upheld the eugenics views of the in Buck v. Bell, 274 U.S. 200 (1927), where the United States Supreme Court, written by Justice Oliver Wendell Holmes, Jr., actually ruled that a state statute permitting compulsory sterilization of the unfit, including the intellectually disabled, “for the protection and health of the state” did not violate the Due Process Clause of the Fourteenth Amendment to the United States Constitution.

The Supreme Court actually wrote: “Three generations of imbeciles are enough.” The Supreme Court has never expressly overturned Buck v. Bell,  274 U.S. 200 (1927). This case has not been overturned, but if it were challenged, then the same right to privacy from which Roe v Wade stands would come into play. Overturn that case, and a lot more tyranny will follow. The only possible way to overturn Roe v Wade must involve the Due Process Right to life and liberty without somehow overturning the right to privacy. That can be a real Pandora’s Box.

Suspension and Delegation Amy Coney Barrett

After reading some of her decisions and this article she wrote regarding the Suspension Clause, I believe she would NOT overturn Roe v Wade simply because of her religion. Here she clearly states that she believes that the statutes involved, which have never been activated since the Civil War domestically, delegate too much discretion to the President. Her reasoning falls in line with Strict Construction championed by Scalia, and therefore I would support her.  I believe the far more important question turns on her view of the power of government. She is not a rubber stamp and that is vital to our liberty in the future. I will note, for those who will say I support here only because she is a conservative nominated by Trump, I reviewed the decisions of Brett Kavanaugh and stated on this blog that I would have voted against his nomination.

POLITICO, the leftist view, as usual, states: “Barrett has stated that “life begins at conception,” according to a 2013 Notre Dame Magazine article. She also said that justices should not be strictly bound by Supreme Court precedents, a deference known as stare decisis, leaving open the possibility that she could vote to overturn Roe v. Wade if seated on the court.” Their view is to hell with every other issue, it’s all about abortion exclusively.

Meanwhile, Nancy Pelosi who is in the House, not the Senate which decides appointments to the Supreme Court, has bluntly stated that she doesn’t rule out impeachment to delay Trump’s picks for the Supreme Court. She is so out of her mind and is clearly engaging in the Obstruction of Justice. She is in the House – not the Senate. The House does not preside of these appointments. As a matter of law, she or any senator is not allowed to ask a judge how they would vote on abortion. The Senate is not permitted to nominate a person based upon a prearranged vote. Chief Justice Roberts, a conservative appointed by President Bush, upheld Obamacare. It is often a matter of constitutional law and trying to guess how Barrett will vote exclusively on abortion is impermissible constitutionally. This assumption is discrimination based upon the fact that she is Catholic and has 7 children, two of whom are adopted from Hati.

Diane Feinstein is running again and she 87 while Nancy Pelosi is 80. These two women liberationists from the 60s no longer represent women today. They are traditionally anti-religion and Feinstein’s question of Barrett before illustrates her hatred of not just religion, but the fact that Barrett even has 7 children which she finds obviously disgusting.


  1. JUNE MEDICAL SERVICES L. L. C. ET AL. v. RUSSO

Why and How did COVID-19 Appear?


Sometime around the turn of the century Bill Gates got involved with Al Gore and the Climate Change movement. Gates took this very seriously and decided to try and stop the destruction of the planet; not realizing that it wasn’t a real threat. The Reason I can say that is I have been studying the “climate” problem for well over 20 years now and although the climate does change, it always has so there is nothing new here. I can say this because of my college courses in Geography and climate so I have a basic understanding of the physical world we live in. The perceived problem relates to the time frames  that these changes of a few degrees up or down take to happen. Obviously the temperature of the planet is directly related to the out put of our sun. But the sun’s output is not a constant it is a variable of a decades long movement driven by the 11 year solar cycle of our sun. That cycle combined with orbital variations and the distribution of the continents creates weather patterns in the oceans and the atmosphere that can give the “illusion” of major changes. If the reader is interested in that subject check out my monthly climate update posted here in MY Climate research.

Gates lacking a college education doesn’t have the proper background in economics, math, statistics, physics and Climate so he was unduly influenced by others that had a different agenda then climate. The group I am referring to is those that have embraced a version of Marxism that has morphed into a version of Marxism where the leaders of the government are the very educated ones in society. Those are the ones that have graduated from the best schools like Harvard, MIT Sanford, Yale, etc. etc. Read the book Technology Rising written by Patrick M. Wood for all the details. These are the “Best and the Brightest” and they want to change the system of government in the United States so that they can save us from ourselves. After all they are our “betters!”

Bill Gates became a member of this group of Technologists when they got into the Green movement in the early 90’s after the collapse of the old U.S.S.R. Simultaneously the Green movement was infiltrated by the Progressives wing of the Democrat party (just another name for a Marxist) in the country  and this is a very toxic combination. This collision comprised of Bill Gates almost unlimited money, the Technologists, the Environmentalists, the Marxists and the Democrat Party is now the group that is orchestrating what is going on in the country today i.e. demonstrations, mob violence, looting, arson and mayhem. The bottom line is that the following groups and organizations are all in bed together and they are being controlled by Bill Gates!

Because of his almost unlimited money Gates runs the movement along with his side kick George Soros and Anthony Fauci. The plan developed by Gates was to save the planet for reducing the population and while doing that why not make it a better superior race by eliminating the weak, the sick and those of lets say lessor ability using eugenics. I think Hitler tried that almost 90 years ago and it didn’t go all that well and probably will not this time either.

According to the National Center for Health Statistics date as of September 9, 2020 the following is true. 179,927 people have died since January 1, 2020 that had the virus in their system. almost all of them had a comorbidity as well meaning that almost no people in good health dies from the virus. look at these numbers and then continue.

Why is this important? well based on the testimony of a Dr. Yan and her assertion that this virus was created in the Wuhan Lab. She fled Hong Kong to the United States in April and says she will never be allowed home. Martin Armstrong has stated from the beginning that this pandemic did not fit with his models as being natural. He has also reported that Dr. Fauci was the one experimenting with this type of virus and was told to stop. He then sent this program off to Wuhan China (maybe being asked to by Bill gates). Every source Armstrong looked at confirms it was made in a lab but was not a bio-weapon because of the “very” low death rate. However, based on the evidence of those who suddenly sold stock and bond positions in December & January, and inside sources who stated a “virus” was coming, Armstrong does not believe that China deliberately leaked this virus.

But maybe bill Gates did? The reason I can say that is Gates’s Father and he both believed in Eugenics and the crazy idea of creating a super race. Gates’s work on over population and virus’s especially the COVID series makes perfect sense as he wanted to reduce the worlds population. So who does he want to get ride of? How about all the old people especially with comorbidity’s for a start, in other words the weak. Now this fits with someone that wants to create a supper race and it also fits with a virus that apparently only kills people with comorbidity’s.  Since there as never been a virus like this its only common sense that it was created in a lab and the only person in the world that has the desire and the money to do this is Bill Gates.

 

Unbelievable FOX has turned “Progressive” Bill Gates, Fox News’ Contribution to the 2020 Election


Fox News is 90 percent entertainment, 10 percent all about ratings—and zero percent ‘Fair and Balanced’

Judi McLeod image

Re-Posted from the Canada Free Press By  —— Bio and ArchivesSeptember 19, 2020

Bill Gates, Fox News’ Contribution to the 2020 Election

Don’t expect any “Fair and Balanced” in election coverage from Fox News, which will come thundering through the Election 2020 Campaign like a herd of wild horses out on the plain, leaving nothing but hoof dust hanging in the air.

Fox headed into Election 2020 with three presidential popularity polls, each one of them indicating that President Donald Trump—who had little to no chance of victory, was badly trailing behind former Obama era vice president Joe Biden.

Within days of the first presidential debate, in which Chris Wallace is to be ‘monitor’, Wallace will interview Bill Gates in an exclusive Sunday interview.

The interview is to take place amidst the public mourning of the passing of Supreme Court Judge, Ruth Bader Ginsburg.  Most Fox News hosts honor the 27-year service of the “pioneer judge”, but Sean Hannity, praising her for battling cancer with “incredible courage” and Bret Baier “She was quite a figure”  came closest to sincerity.

Fox also gave over space for politicians who would try to steal RGB thunder at the time of her death, including the self-centred Hillary Clinton who said: : “Ginsburg ‘paved the way for so many women, including me.”

Wallace, meanwhile will not only interview Gates—who claims that President Trump “may have worsened the coronavirus pandemic with his travel bans”—in Sunday’s exclusive interview, but Fox promoted the upcoming interview for two days straight.

Notice that nowhere in the Fox promotion of the Wallace Gates interview is it being mentioned that Gates has a vested interest in anything he has to say about the Covid-19 pandemic because of his influence in the vaccine industry:

“Microsoft founder Bill Gates told “Fox News Sunday” anchor Chris Wallace President Trump may have worsened the coronavirus pandemic with his travel bans, in an exclusive interview set to air this weekend. (Fox News, Sept. 18, 2020)

“On Jan. 31, Trump issued a travel ban on China after the coronavirus broke out in Wuhan before issuing others in February and March, banning travel from Europe and other countries with coronavirus outbreaks.

“We created this rush, and we didn’t have the ability to test or quarantine those people,” the billionaire philanthropist said.

“And so that seeded the disease here. You know, the ban probably accelerated that, the way it was executed,” Gates said.

“Wallace pressed Gates: “You’re saying that the travel bans made the situation worse, not better?”

“Gates explained that “March saw this incredible explosion—the West Coast coming from China and then the East Coast coming out of Europe, and so, even though we’d seen China and we’d seen Europe, that testing capacity and clear message of how to behave wasn’t there.”

“On Thursday, Gates said the Food and Drug Administration has “lost a lot of credibility” during the pandemic in an interview with Bloomberg.

“Early on in response to COVID-19, experts from the Bill and Melinda Gates Foundation were in regular contact with the Trump administration, urging officials to come up with a plan for testing and to get surveillance data up on the website of the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention, STAT News reports.

“There’s no question the United States missed the opportunity to get ahead of the novel coronavirus,” Gates wrote in a Washington Post op-ed on March 31.

“The choices we and our leaders make now will have an enormous impact on how soon case numbers start to go down, how long the economy remains shut down and how many Americans will have to bury a loved one because of Covid-19.”

With the Gates interview, Wallace—and therefore Fox News—has laid the groundwork for the presidential question: Did President Trump, as Gates contends “worsened the coronavirus pandemic with his travel bans?”

Don’t expect anything “Fair and Balanced” during Fox News’ presentation of the first 2020 presidential debate.

Fox News is 90 percent entertainment, 10 percent all about ratings—and zero percent ‘Fair and Balanced’.

The best part about watching Fox News is that most of their viewers now know it.