Tag Archives: WHO China-centric

Apr 24 2020

New York Coronavirus Test Shows State-Wide 14% Infection Rate – New York City 21% – Data Indicates Mortality Rate 0.5%…


Posted originally om The Conservative Tree House on April 23, 2020 by 

Earlier today New York Governor Andrew Cuomo released initial data from 3,000 people tested for COVID-19 antibodies throughout the state.  Interestingly, though not surprisingly, the field tests were conducted on the general public who were visiting retail supermarkets and box stores (WalMart, Target, Costco, etc.).  The resulting data falls directly in line with previous CTH analysis of human interface.

The preliminary New York results show a state-wide infection rate of 13.9 percent within the sample. Which would extend to 2.7 million people state-wide.  With that infection rate, the mortality rate from the infection would drop to 0.5 percent.

The samples show an infection rate in New York City is 21.2 percent. [WATCH]

(VIA CBS) – New York’s first survey of coronavirus antibodies shows that 13.9% of those tested in the state had coronavirus antibodies in their system, meaning they have contracted and recovered from the virus, New York Governor Andrew Cuomo said Thursday. That suggests that 2.7 million people have been infected statewide.

The survey was taken from a sample size of about 3,000 people found outside their homes, shopping at essential businesses, such as grocery stores, which remain open. Results show antibodies in 12% of women and 15.9% of men, but a disproportionate rate of antibodies in black and Latino New Yorkers.(more)

(Reuters) “If the infection rate is 13.9 percent, then it changes the theories of what the death rate is if you get infected,” Cuomo told a daily briefing.

The survey targeted people who were out shopping, but not working, meaning they were not essential workers like grocery clerks or bus drivers but were more likely to test positive for antibodies than someone isolated at home, Cuomo said. (read more)

The direct result of this survey is that 14 percent of people in New York who interacted with retail supermarket cashiers were previously infected with the Coronavirus; or carried the coronavirus antibodies…

REPEATING – There are few high-traffic businesses more densely populated than grocery stores.  In fact, within the U.S. economy retail supermarkets have the highest foot traffic of any business sector in the entire economy; that’s just an empirical fact…. and the coronavirus impact increased that foot traffic by an average of 40 percent.  Now, stop and think about this logically & apply a large dose of common sense. Think about human-to-human interface.

♦First, with approximately 90 percent of the total U.S. population penetrating through grocery outlets; and with 100% of that massive number of consumers going through checkout lanes; if the COVID-19 viral strain was as significant as claimed by the worst-case data, then supermarket cashiers would have been the highest exposed profession of U.S. workers in the entire nation.  There wouldn’t even be a close second place.

Considering that metric; and considering the overall population penetration & density within the business operation; there has not been an employee-based business disruption due to the coronavirus.  Put another way: the coronavirus has not stopped the function of the highest human interface occupation in the entire U.S. economy.

♦Secondly, think about the businesses that are closed; perhaps think about your job that may have been shut down…. now frame your risk based on the supermarket example as highest human interface and highest population penetration in any business field.

If the #1 at risk industry has operated, essentially without disruption and with almost zero substantive mitigation, while carrying the largest population exposure rate, then all other less-exposed business operations would have significantly less operational risk.

Why would anyone be concerned about opening their business?

If you take the factual outcome of the retail food industry as a measure, it would follow that other than a few proximity businesses which may need prudent modifications or remain temporarily closed (ex. modified airplane seating, concerts, stadiums or capacity seating venues etc), then all other businesses should immediately resume operations.

No other business segment within the economy is as exposed to the population as the retail food business; and yet supermarkets operated without issue.

So why shouldn’t all businesses immediately get back to work?

Perhaps a few initial modifications might be needed; but not much, and not for long.

Think about it….

Apr 24 2020

Weekly Unemployment Claims Add Another 4.4 Million – Cumulative Virus Impact 26 Million New Claims…


Posted originally on The Conservative Tree House on April 23, 2020 by 

Another painful week as the Dept. of Laborprovides the latest data on jobs and the economy. For the week ending April 18, an additional 4.427 million Americans filed unemployment claims.

Over the past five weeks, more than 26 million Americans have filed unemployment insurance claims.

U.S. Labor Secretary Eugene Scalia issued the following statement:

“Today’s unemployment report shows continued, elevated unemployment claims caused by the coronavirus pandemic. The Department of Labor is continuing to provide guidance and support to the States as they implement the enhanced unemployment benefits under the CARES Act, with 44 States now paying the $600 additional weekly benefit provided by the Act.”

“The Department also continues to implement the paid leave requirements of the Families First Coronavirus Response Act, and has now initiated hundreds of cases to ensure workers receive what they’re entitled to under the law. As American businesses look to open up again under the guidelines presented by the White House last week, the Department’s Occupational Safety and Health Administration will continue to provide guidance and support to protect workers and ensure safe workplaces, backed up as necessary by appropriate use of OSHA’s enforcement authorities.”  (LINK)

Apr 23 2020

Download and Send this letter to Everyone You Know!


DOWNLOAD: President Donald Trump Letter- April 21-rv

 

This is the first page of the letter …

 

Apr 23 2020

Guterres Focuses Only on Supporting Green Jobs in the Midst of Pandemic Crisis


Does the Universal Declaration of the Rights of Mother Earth also confer the same legal protection upon the coronavirus because it is part of “Mother Earth?”

Joseph A. Klein, CFP United Nations Columnist imageRe-posted from the Conservative Tree House By  —— Bio and Archives—April 23, 2020

“On this International Mother Earth Day,” United Nations Secretary General Antonio Guterres proclaimed, “all eyes are on the COVID-19 pandemic – the biggest test the world has faced since the Second World War.” He issued this proclamation under the banner “Climate Action” in an attempt to link the devastating health and economic crisis wrought by the coronavirus pandemic to the UN’s radical climate change agenda. “We must act decisively to protect our planet from both the coronavirus and the existential threat of climate disruption. The current crisis is an unprecedented wake-up call.”

The Secretary General is following Rahm Emanuel’s advice to “never allow a crisis go to waste.” He is in sync with Democratic Socialist Rep. Alexandria Ocasio-Cortez (AOC), a leading champion of the Green New Deal. She tweeted recently that “it’s the right time for a worker-led, mass investment in green infrastructure to save our planet.” In an even more reckless remark, AOC said that when faced with the decision whether to go back to work after conditions are safe enough to reopen the country Americans should “just say no.”

The International Monetary Fund has predicted that the global lockdown will create an economic crisis not seen since the Great Depression. Job losses are already catastrophic, with far more job losses to come. With a combination of fiscal and monetary policies, governments are trying to rescue businesses that are willing to save the jobs of their workers. But as far as Secretary General Guterres is concerned, only “green jobs” are worth the expenditure of taxpayers’ money. He said that “as we spend huge amounts of money to recover from the coronavirus, we must deliver new jobs and businesses through a clean, green transition.”  He is pressing for an end to fossil fuel subsidies.

Mr. Guterres can afford to make such sweeping statements because, unlike President Trump and other government leaders, he is not accountable for the welfare of the millions of people in their countries at risk of losing their jobs today that are tied to fossil fuel energy. Fortunately, President Trump is not listening to the Secretary General.  “We will never let the great U.S. Oil & Gas Industry down,” President Trump said on Twitter. “I have instructed the Secretary of Energy and Secretary of the Treasury to formulate a plan which will make funds available so that these very important companies and jobs will be secured long into the future!”

The UN’s embrace of “Mother Earth” is yet another step in the direction of global governance of the environment that Canadian oil businessman-cum-radical environmentalist Maurice Strong initiated back in the 1990’s. Strong leveraged his contacts at the United Nations to organize the United Nations Conference on Environment and Development—the so-called “Earth Summit”—which took place in Rio de Janeiro in 1992. He went on from there to push for the adoption and implementation world-wide of a document that became known as Agenda 21 — an 800-page blueprint for ‘sustainable development’ in the 21st century.

Who knew that a bat has the same legal rights as a human being?

This in turn was followed by Strong’s work on the “Earth Charter,” which was approved at the United Nations Educational, Scientific and Cultural Organization headquarters in Paris in March 2000. One can think of the 2016 Paris Climate Agreement as the direct descendant of the Earth Charter. But globalists are looking far beyond the Paris agreement. They are busy concocting the idea that Mother Earth has its own inherent legal rights worthy of protections from the acts of human beings.

The website of the Community Environmental Legal Defense Fund (CELDF) declares: “Laws recognizing the Rights of Nature change the status of ecosystems and natural communities to being recognized as rights-bearing entities. As such, they have rights that can be enforced by people, governments, and communities on behalf of nature.” CELDF assisted in the drafting of the Universal Declaration of the Rights of Mother Earth, which was modeled on the Universal Declaration of Human Rights. “Mother Earth is a living being,” it says. “Mother Earth and all beings are entitled to all the inherent rights recognized in this Declaration without distinction of any kind, such as may be made between organic and inorganic beings, species, origin, use to human beings, or any other status.”

Who knew that a bat has the same legal rights as a human being?  Does the Universal Declaration of the Rights of Mother Earth also confer the same legal protection upon the coronavirus because it is part of “Mother Earth?” As preposterous as this sounds, the United Nations General Assembly listened to a presentation about the Universal Declaration of the Rights of Mother Earth and passed resolutions calling for interactive dialogues on the role of “Earth jurisprudence” in conjunction with International Mother Earth Day. The UN Secretary General’s 2018 report on Harmony with Nature defined Earth jurisprudence as “a philosophy of law and human governance in which humans are only one part of a wider community of beings.”

The 2020 “Interactive dialogue on Harmony with Nature” was cancelled by the General Assembly because of the coronavirus pandemic. Earth jurisprudence was on the agenda. Maybe next year, the participants can discuss a lawsuit against the coronavirus itself since the UN’s World Health Organization believes that China, where the virus originated, did nothing wrong.

Apr 23 2020

Calling People “Non-Essential” Latest Insult From Government


Calling Americans “non-essential,” is derogatory and uncalled for, akin to Hillary Clinton’s “basket of deplorables” comment and Obama’s disdain for those who “bitterly cling to their religion and guns.”

Daniel Wiseman image

Re-posted from the Canada Free Press By —— Bio and Archives—April 23, 2020

Calling People Non-Essential Latest Insult From GovernmentBy labeling many private sector workers as “non-essential” during the COVID-19 crisis, government again needlessly insults regular Americans.

Affixing the word “non-essential” to a human being is anti-life elitism. The message: “We’re from the government and know better than you. We enlightened ones understand, but you the great unwashed do not.”

These mostly Democrat governors in their executive orders are stealing people’s dignity and the right to assemble and engage in commerce. In truth, nearly every business and government agency in the United States was designated “essential,” and allowed to operate. However, businesses involved in amusements and certain retail operations were declared “non-essential” and forced to close. That the overwhelming number of businesses were allowed to open despite the COVID-19 contagion risk creates a double-standard for those engaged in leisure activities. Classifying someone trying to make a living as “non-essential” represents a sick ideology and hurts people’s spiritual and mental well-being. Every worker is “essential” to somebody, particularly when it comes to supporting their families. There are now more than 20 million Americans who have lost their jobs in the last four weeks.

It’s totalitarian for the government to decide what is essential and who is not. The government belongs to We The People, and not the other way around. Ground Zero for “non-essential” workers, ironically, is the government itself. By definition, there ought to be no “non-essential” workers in government because taxpayers pay those salaries.

In our consumer culture, leisure activities and amusements are essential to those who find them essential. For example, as a former Pittsburgher, remove football and the Steelers from Pittsburgh and it’s not the same place. The Steelers are the singular unifying feature of life there. If you don’t think the Steelers are “essential” to Pittsburgh, you haven’t lived there.

Besides waging war, government rarely competes with the private sector in terms of quality. Private schools and hospitals uniformly function better than public ones. One trip to any state department of motor vehicles ought to disavow any sane person of wanting the federal government to take over health care in United States.

The massive shutdown of the economy to combat COVID-19 is now being used by the Left to “re-envision” the United States, particularly taking the opportunity to destroy capitalism and replace it with socialism. One person on Twitter posted that re-opening the country and free enterprise is a “death cult.”

It’s a small leap from being “non-essential” to becoming “obsolete.” How pernicious this thinking is can be found in random internet searches.

From a Wiki User in 2013, “Non-essential workers are those employees that require little or no training and are in positions that almost any able bodied person could fulfill.”

Also from Wiki User in 2014, “The U.S. government makes a distinction between essential and non-essential workers. The U.S. government cannot operate without essential workers like Congressmen and key- (office) holders. Non-essentialworkers are those that do nothing directly affecting the government’s operations.”

These are anti-American ideas and they cannot be allowed to triumph during the hysterical government response to COVID-19.
It has been a month since Governor Andrew Cuomo ruled who is non-essential in New York and ordered workers to work from home and to remain indoors as much as possible to slow the spread of COVID-19.

Here is who Cuomo declared essential employees, those working in:

  • Health care operations, including research and laboratory services.
  • Infrastructure, including utilities.
  • Telecommunications.
  • Airports and transportation.
  • Manufacturing of food and pharmaceuticals.
  • Grocery stores and pharmacies.
  • Trash collection.
  • Mail and shipping services.
  • News media.
  • Banks and related financial institutions.
  • Providers of basic necessities to economically disadvantaged populations.
  • Construction.
  • Vendors to services necessary to maintain safety.
  • Sanitation and essential operations in residences and most businesses.
  • Vendors that provide essential services or products in logistics and technology.
  • Child care and services needed to ensure the continuing operation of government.
  • Additional guidance posted by the state added services such as laundromats and animal-care clinics.

That’s nearly everybody, so why differentiate between essential and non-essential?

Which businesses did Cuomo declare non-essential? Those that people frequent for pleasure, like gyms, bars, restaurants, movie theaters, museums, sporting events and concert halls. The All-Powerful Cuomo said his rationale to close these businesses was that they are hubs of social interaction, making them a higher risk for spreading COVID-19 among the population.

In reality, these amusement businesses could have established their own safety guidelines in conjunction with reasonable government standards, which are in short supply. Amusements are essential to the American Way of Life, but we all like different things. Some like Broadway, some Hip Hop. Some baseball; some rodeo. Some read the Bible and want to go to church; others like drinking in a bar and having a good time.

Calling Americans “non-essential,” is derogatory and uncalled for, akin to Hillary Clinton’s “basket of deplorables” comment and Obama’s disdain for those who “bitterly cling to their religion and guns.” All hard-working Americans are essential; there is a word for the Left’s labeling people non-essential: heinous.

Apr 23 2020

What’s Up Doc?!


Lady Gaga called the Doc a “superstar” during the One World concert designed to prop up the rotten borough that is WHO. Do entertainers, actors really have any conception about this guy Doc Tedros and his checkered history?

John Burtis image

Re-posted from the Canada Free Press By  —— Bio and Archives—April 23, 2020

Lady Gaga, and TedrosWhen I think of the vaunted World Health Organization, under the guidance of the onetime big tooth on the crushing cog of the cruel Marxist dictatorship which used to run Ethiopia, erstwhile kidnapper and that great and good healer, good old Doctor Tedros Adhanom-Ghebreyesus PhD, I am reminded of the old vaudeville act of Abbott and Costello and WHO’s on first, especially when their routine, like WHO’s and old Doc Tedros’s, follows the money:

Costello: WHO gets the money?…
Abbott: He does, every dollar. Sometimes his wife comes down and collects it.
Costello: WHO’s wife?
Abbott: Yes.

WHO has degenerated into a good time club of bureaucrats whose primary goal is jet-setting, lavish meals with top shelf booze and babes

Unlike the once great United Nations, where pitifully selfless individuals like Trygvie Lie and Dag Hammarskjold  once walked the storied halls of the UN, WHO has degenerated into a good time club of bureaucrats whose primary goal is jet-setting, lavish meals with top shelf booze and, according to wags in Stockholm and Kigali, babes.

WHO is no longer managed by the selfless sort of medical men like Arrowsmith and Gottlieb that are so richly described by Sinclair Lewis.  Nope, the UN health agency with global reach blows around $200 million a year on travel alone so its key grips and gaffers can fly business class and stay in five-star hotels — more than what it spends for battling some of the world’s biggest health crises like AIDS, according to the AP.  Meanwhile, with five times as many staffers, those pitiful lowlife chumps over at Doctors Without Borders, spend a bit over $40 million a year on travel, motels and yurts – the poor saps.

But let’s not overlook a few jots from the celebrated background of good old Doc Tedros Adhanom-Ghebreyesus PhD.

Before it came to power in 1991, in Ethiopia, through a violently destructive armed revolution, the TPLF was listed as a terrorist organization by the U.S. Homeland Security’s Global Terrorism Database.  Inside the Tigray People Liberation Front or TPLF, the major honchos could have been located in their nine-member gang–the executive committee.  This clique was ultimately responsible for all the corruption, killings, torture, mass detention, land grabs or the displacement of thousands as well as divying up the proceeds from their corrupt methods.  Good old Doc Adhanom was among the top three within that gang and on this committee and he was very close to the late dictator Meles Zenawi, who expired in 2012 from a sudden onset infection, which some said was from an overexposure to lead, the typical gangster’s death.

Once the right-hand man of Zenawi, whom Adhanom refers to as “the great leader”, he wasn’t an ordinary health minister (2005-2012) or a foreign minister (2012-2016). Doc Tedros had risen from a rank-and-file thug in the TPLF to its central and executive committees. TPLF, where membership is based on the twin virtues of ethnic origin and brutality, is responsible for countless killings, torture, mass detentions and violent repressions. The TPLF had instituted a discriminatory political and economic structure that enabled it to dominate and subjugate the majority in Ethiopia. Given this narrow-minded, ethnocentric experience combined with a taste for violence, his upcoming aspiration to lead WHO is a bit hard to swallow and pass.  Can killers be healers?

In 2014, following a meeting with Yemeni security forces, Adhanom and his delegation of cronies wanted Yemen to have dissidents that enter Yemen to seek asylum or use Sana’a International Airport as a transit route, kidnapped and handed back over to them, according to two credible former security operatives.

Andargachew Tsege, a British citizen of Ethiopian origin, was top on the list of dissidents that the delegation, of which good old Doc Tedros Adhanom PhD was leader, wanted them, in CIA parlance, “terminated with extreme prejudice.” Tsege, who was one of the key figures in the 2005 popular movement for change and democracy in Ethiopia, had already received two death sentences in absentia in 2009 and 2012 for preaching such idiocy in Ethiopia, the good old doc’s home.

How did China gain such influence over old Doc Tedros Adhanom-Ghebreyesus

A few days after being kidnapped in June 2014, Tsege was hauled in front of Ethiopian TV for the usual perp walk. Adhanom who appeared on VOA Amharic in July 2015 and told the nation that although Tsege’s kidnapping was definitely justified, the poor man was receiving all the comforts of home in captivity, with a laptop, a TV and good eats. While the latter was not the case, after pressure by the Brits and the, now get this, the UN, Tsege was released in 2018 with 575 other unfortunates who shared death row with him. The kidnappers have never been brought to justice, have they, good Doc Tedros Adhanom PhD?

Lately out on the hustings, “Tedros apparently turned a blind eye to what happened in Wuhan and the rest of China and, after meeting with Xi in January, has helped Red China to play down the severity, prevalence and scope of the COVID-19 outbreak,” University of Texas-San Antonio professor Henry Thayer and Citizens Power Initiatives for China vice president Lianchao Han wrote in a March 17 op-ed published in The Hill.  Meanwhile WHO is now peddling Red China’s claims to have reduced the number of new infections in Wuhan to zero (0). Really, WHO?

How did China gain such influence over old Doc Tedros Adhanom-Ghebreyesus and done so much getting him elected with their monetary and material gifts to Africa’s perpetual poor and mismanaged nations?  “In short, the total contributions of China versus the U.S. is $86 million versus $893 million,” David Maxwell, a senior fellow at the Foundation for Defense of Democracies (FDD), told Fox News. “The U.S. contributes nearly 10 times the amount China does.”  I’ll bet you that there must be other inducements and emoluments going around to pave the good Doc’s path to the top slot in WHO’s corporation.  Or did Doc Tedros pick up a few tips from his Whitey Bulger days in the Horn of Africa?

Lady Gaga has called the Doc a “superstar”

Just like those thousands in Ethiopia in the bad old days of the TPLF when the bad old good Doc Tedros was a running wild, a Chinese real estate mogul who criticized his government’s response has suddenly disappeared. The Red Chinese have also severely punished doctors with real MDs who tried to warn the public in the outbreak’s early stages and later kept the lid on information about the virus so it wouldn’t escape online.

Sure, Lady Gaga has called the Doc a “superstar” during her comments in the latest One World concert designed to prop up the rotten borough that is WHO.  But do entertainers and actors really have any conception about this guy Doc Tedros and his checkered history?  Of course they don’t.  More is the pity.

Abbott & Costello Who’s On First

Apr 23 2020

Surviving The Democrat/Media Coronavirus Hit List


The Democrat Scare Machine will grind to a deafening halt the day that America is legislated back to work

Judi McLeod image

Re-Posted from the Canada Free Press By  —— Bio and Archives—April 22, 2020

 

Surviving The Democrat/Media Coronavirus Hit ListIn the end it won’t be “mitigation” and computer models that will save humanity from the deadly pandemic known as the Coronavirus—but the amount of time it took to release homebound citizens from stay-at-home government dictates.

Americans have always earned their own keep and with the help of farmers, have always fed their own families.

Going back to work may not be what current day doctors order, but what plain common sense does.

Now with full daily access to a massive digital classroom of anxiety-ridden adults, the good doctors repeat ad nauseum that it’s all about washing hands, giving up the kind of crowds encountered at places of work and worship, entertainment and sport venues; advise the wearing of masks that leave the eyes vulnerable, social distancing from neighbors and loved ones—even as they buy into dire predictions that Coronavirus could have a “deadlier” second wave later this year.

“The head of the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (CDC) is warning that a second wave of coronavirus could coincide with the start of flu season, proving to be even more devastating than the enduring COVID-19 pandemic. (Fox News, April 21, 2020)

“CDC Director Robert Redfield told The Washington Post in an interview Tuesday that the nation should be cautious even as some states attempt to reopen their economies in the coming weeks and continue to practice social distancing measures to mitigate the spread of the virus.”

Both doctors on the Coronavirus Task Force and the CDC speak the same “mitigation” language.

Questions to both Task Force doctors and the CDC:

Shouldn’t we all have been washing our hands and avoiding crowds during every year’s flu season which take tens of thousands of lives— 24,000 – 62,000 deaths this flu season alone?! (CDC)

WHEN will America be allowed to return to their livelihoods?

Meanwhile, even walks in the park to take in the fresh air are being denied to the masses by government officials, who were first to cave in to the Coronavirus pandemic scare.

While confined to home it is not boredom of the lockdown that should be the biggest concern, but the far more realistic threat of somehow surviving in the massive economic downturn brought on by the pandemic.

WHEN will America be allowed to return to their livelihoods?

It all comes down to this: Democrats will do everything possible to keep Americans from going back to work—knowing that President Donald Trump will restore the economy back to what it was pre-pandemic and be re-elected in a landslide.

Having lost their Russians-stole-the-election hoax and the Congressional Impeach Trump trial, ALL Democratic hands are now on deck to prevent the above from ever happening.

Democrat leaders Barack and Michelle Obama, the media and Hollywood are working to “fundamentally transform” the 2020 election into a complete mail-in-cheat-vote

Led by Nancy Pelosi, Chuck Schumer, Adam Schiff et al, they feverishly await the return of the Obamas and Hillary Clinton to power.

The battlefronts they are forming are expanding by day.

In the latest battlefront, Facebook is working hand in hand with Democrat Governors to ban grassroots, Tea Party-like lockdown protests breaking out all over the country. (Breitbart, April 20, 2020)

Seeing what’s happening, the grassroots demand to know when government stop-work orders will end.

Unfortunately,  they will never end because Congress and government reps will never have a freeze on their pay checks.

Think about this: While countless millions of small business owners and the countless employees they hire are now at home holding out hope that they won’t be completely wiped out by the economic downturn brought on by the pandemic, Democrat leaders Barack and Michelle Obama, the media and Hollywood are working to “fundamentally transform” the 2020 election into a complete mail-in-cheat-vote.

The ridiculousness has been finally been brought to the gag sublime by Michelle Obama who has the unmitigated gall to call her ‘When We All Vote’ initiative “NON-PARTISAN”!

 

Power-obsessed Democrats need the masses to go hungry, broke and left hopelessly indebted to government and bank loans

The entire COVID-19 panic has been run by scare tactics, in which the masses are being coached that death will come from hugging a loved one and that not putting six feet between you and your neighbors could end up killing you.

“Non-essential” elected officials—who have declared virtually all little people who keep America up and running “non-essential”—will keep doling out scare tactics on the masses from the safety of their comfortable, overpaid guaranteed pay check positions.

Will they next declare truckers delivering produce to the supermarkets and first responders as “non-essential”?

Power-obsessed Democrats need the masses to go hungry, broke and left hopelessly indebted to government and bank loans.

Meanwhile, there’s a light beginning to flicker down at the far end of the tunnel:

The Democrat Scare Machine will grind to a deafening halt the day that America is legislated back to work.

For the sake of sheer survival it can’t happen soon enough.

Apr 23 2020

Trump v Gates – Is Gates Winning to Overthrow Trump?


Armstrong Economics Blog/Uncategorized

Re-Posted Apr 23, 2020 by Martin Armstrong
This COVID-19 has undermined the economy in a way where we will not return back to normalcy. The Washington Post and the New York Times just take the opposite view of whatever Trump does without any consideration of what they are reporting. The Washington Post has targeted Gov. Brian Kemp of Georgia, calling his reopening of the economy an “aggressive course.” They said he is some first-term governor, so he obviously doesn’t know what he is doing. This is no longer about the people or the country — this is becoming just hate politics.

These leftist media outlets make no effort to review the consequences of this shutdown. There is no investigation of how people have lost everything or that they expect 30% of mortgages to default. Trump wants to reopen and they simply argue the opposite. There is no investigation of the conflicts of interest with regard to these health organizations, and they place Bill Gates on a pedestal as the savior of the world.

The media portrays CO2 as evil as it causes climate change, yet they never report that there is a coronavirus-driven CO2 shortage that threatens US food and water supply. We need CO2 to clean water. Without CO2, this threatens the supply of drinking water. CO2 is also used in soda and beer production. Yet, they cheer Bill Gates and his object to get to zero CO2.

Then if you want to know WHO is deliberately trying to destroy modern society, just look at the WHO and the United States. The WHO has never had a peer review report to suggest that this virus would be lethal enough to shut down the world economy. The absence of this is critical. As protests are rising, they continually justify the continuation of a lockdown, which has become a tyrannical house arrest, for the sole purpose of destroying the economy so it can be rebuilt from scratch without CO2 or any regard for the human suffering. There will be far more deaths from this house arrest and the total destruction to all debt, both borrowing and lending, which will also undermine the entire banking system and pensions.

The WHO now claims in another fictional report that “maybe as few as 2% or 3%” of the population has antibodies in their blood, showing they have been infected with COVID-19. They continue to argue that the world needs to be locked down, ignoring the structural changes that have already ensured the world will NEVER be the same again. When we look at the actual data, 40% of all deathsin New Jersey have been in nursing homes, which Sweden locked-down. This does not warrant closing the world economy where more people will lose everything and Gates & the WHO could care less provided they get their end goal – climate change restructuring.

Bill Gates and his control of the WHO is outrageous. He has assumed control of the world economy and the leftist press protects him like a bulletproof vest simply because they hate Trump. Make no mistake about it, Gates profits from steering technology. There are serious conflicts of interest that the leftist press ignores and will NEVER investigate. The real question is why have the leftist press declared a war against the future of the nation and the people while ignoring the hidden corruption in many health organizations?

Apr 23 2020

YouTube Removes Older Documentaries Showing Corruption at WHO


Armstrong Economics Blog/Human Rights

Re-Posted Apr 23, 2020 by Martin Armstrong

 

The censorship bein imposed by Youtube, Facebook, and others trying to crush any resistance to being locked-down. This documentary has been out for years. They are now reviewing anything that exposures the truth of the World Health Organization and the corruption that is systemic. We need to write to everyone in Congress and demand an investigation into WHO. If we do not do this, we have lost all our freedoms.

Taking this documentary down which has been out for years is a major warning of how we are entering an era indistinguishable from the old Soviet Union and Pravda – the Truth. Nobody removes conspiracy theories about aliens or alien abductions. So why remove anything that calls into question vaccines and the World Health Organization. I bet is anyone came out with a youtube post calling into question Bill Gates and his wife and what they are making from vaccines it would be removed.

The ONLY reason to remove anything that calls into question the WHO or vaccines and the truth of the coronavirus scam is that it is hitting too close to the real truth. They are counting on people being obedient to authority and willing to surrender all human rights because the mob acts like a herd of sheep waiting to be told what to do next.

I would love to see a REAL poll taken about who believes this virus on a week by week basis.

Apr 23 2020

Tucker Carlson Questions The Wisdom of The Lock-down Approach…


Posted originally on The Conservative Tree House on April 22, 2020 by 

During his opening monologue today Fox News host Tucker Carlson outlines how the Wuhan Virus has led to an authoritarian police state without any real basis in science.

“It is easier to be fooled, than to convince people they have been fooled.” Mark Twain.

.

What Carlson alludes to, though he didn’t specifically connect-the-dot, is the reality of how some sectors of the U.S. economy (the supermarket industry) have continued without issue. That factual reality doesn’t reconcile with the doomsday claims.

No other business segment within the economy is as exposed to the population as the retail food business; and yet supermarkets operated without issue.

There are few high-traffic businesses more densely populated than grocery stores.  In fact, within the U.S. economy retail supermarkets have the highest foot traffic of any business sector in the entire economy; that’s just an empirical fact…. and the coronavirus impact increased that foot traffic by an average of 40 percent.  Now, stop and think about this logically & apply a large dose of common sense. Think about human-to-human interface.

♦First, with approximately 90 percent of the total U.S. population penetrating through grocery outlets; and with 100% of that massive number of consumers going through checkout lanes; if the COVID-19 viral strain was as significant as claimed by the worst-case data, then supermarket cashiers would have been the highest exposed profession of U.S. workers in the entire nation.  There wouldn’t even be a close second place.

Considering that metric; and considering the overall population penetration & density within the business operation; there has not been an employee-based business disruption due to the coronavirus.  Put another way: the coronavirus has not stopped the function of the highest human interface occupation in the entire U.S. economy.

♦Secondly, think about the businesses that are closed; perhaps think about your job that may have been shut down…. now frame your risk based on the supermarket example as highest human interface and highest population penetration in any business field.

If the #1 at risk industry has operated, essentially without disruption and with almost zero substantive mitigation, while carrying the largest population exposure rate, then all other less-exposed business operations would have significantly less operational risk.

Why would anyone be concerned about opening their business?

If you take the factual outcome of the retail food industry as a measure, it would follow that other than a few proximity businesses which may need prudent modifications or remain temporarily closed (ex. modified airplane seating, concerts, stadiums or capacity seating venues etc), then all other businesses should immediately resume operations.

No other business segment within the economy is as exposed to the population as the retail food business; and yet supermarkets operated without issue.

So why shouldn’t all businesses immediately get back to work?

Perhaps a few initial modifications might be needed; but not much, and not for long.

Think about it….