Did Border Crisis Trigger Measles Outbreak?


From the number of illegals that have been allowed in from poor central America and Africa most of which have not been vaccinated for anything — its almost 100% certain that this is the source!

Mountain★Republic's avatarMountain★Republic

Sudden outbreak coincides with border invasion

Did Border Crisis Trigger Measles Outbreak?Joel B. Pollak | Breitbart


The sudden outbreak of measles across the United States raises questions about how the disease arrived in the country after it was eradicated here in 2000.

A quick review of the U.S. State Department visa requirements for immigrant visas reveals that applicants must be vaccinated for measles prior to their approval. Measles vaccination is not required for tourist visas, according to the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention, nor is it required for any other disease.

That leaves three possibilities. One is that a tourist present legally in the U.S. brought measles to the country while visiting. This is the most plausible explanation, given that the outbreak began at Disneyland.

Another possibility is that an illegal immigrant brought measles to the country.

Read more…

View original post

CEO Of Gallup Calls 5.6% Unemployment A Lie


I majored in economics in college and I can tell you that this is very real and it is a very big problem! Keep in mind that if you aren’t working , that someone else some place is working to support you! How many of those working can be supported by those not working.

johngalt's avatarYouViewed/Editorial

The Big Lie: 5.6% Unemployment

” Here’s something that many Americans — including some of the smartest and most educated among us — don’t know: The official unemployment rate, as reported by the U.S. Department of Labor, is extremely misleading.

  Right now, we’re hearing much celebrating from the media, the White House and Wall Street about how unemployment is “down” to 5.6%. The cheerleading for this number is deafening. The media loves a comeback story, the White House wants to score political points and Wall Street would like you to stay in the market.

  None of them will tell you this: If you, a family member or anyone is unemployed and has subsequently given up on finding a job — if you are so hopelessly out of work that you’ve stopped looking over the past four weeks — the Department of Labor doesn’t count you as unemployed. That’s…

View original post 473 more words

Angry King Of Jordan Quotes Clint Eastwood In Vowing Revenge/Retaliation Upon ISIS – Begin With Immediate Executions Of Two ISIS Prisoners….


Jordan’s King Abdullah would make a better US President that Obama could ever hope to be! He doesn’t even know why he is not qualified!

OBAMANATION


Can’t say it much better than this!

The Politics Of Envy


It’s good to keep posting this message, maybe in a few decades of constant repeats the people will finally remember it.

How to deal with enemies, foreign and domestic


I don’t think there is much one could say about this except it hits the nail on the head — read and watch I’m sure you will all enjoy this great work!

danmillerinpanama's avatardanmillerinpanama

Editor’s note: This is a post by my (imaginary) guest author, the Very Honorable Ima Librul, Senator from the great State of Confusion Utopia. He is a founding member of CCCEB (Climate Change Causes Everything Bad), a charter member of President Obama’s Go For it Team, a senior member of the Senate Foreign Relations Committee and Chairman of the Meretricious Relations Subcommittee. He is also justly proud of his expertise in the care and breeding of unicorns, for which his Save the Unicorns Foundation has received substantial Federal grants. We are honored to have a post of this caliber by a quintessential Librul such as the Senator. Without further delay, here is the Senator’s article.

***********************

As the anointed leader of my Librul kingdom, countless methods for dealing with “enemies” are at my disposal. I, along with my loyal Secretary of Slyness (SOS) Sir Ketchup, bring happiness to all. Many “enemies” of my…

View original post 1,198 more words

Will New AG Support Civil Forfeiture Reform?


This  is a growing issue that needs to be stopped, for if not stopped the next step will be a debtors prison!

Posted on Mon 02/02/2015 by

caruba_alan20080111By Alan Caruba ~

The  Wednesday hearings on the confirmation of a new Attorney General, Loretta Lynch, (pictured) lasted hours because members of the Senate Judiciary Committee were often called away to vote. In the wake of the scandals surrounding the manner in which Eric Holder’s Department of Justice has functioned, the hearing, led now by Republicans, could have been harsh, but it was not. The Wall Street Journal characterized the mood in the hearing room as “cordial.” Watching it on CSPAN, I can confirm that.

AA - Loretta LynchIn early November the Wall Street Journal, in an opinion titled “The Next Attorney General: One area to question Loretta Lynch is civil asset forfeiture”, it noted that “As a prosecutor Ms. Lynch had also been aggressive in pursuing civil asset forfeiture, which has become a form of politicking for profit.”

“She recently announced that her office had collected more than $904 million in criminal and civil actions in fiscal 2013, according to the Brooklyn Daily Eagle. Liberals and conservatives have begun to question forfeiture as an abuse of due process that can punish the innocent.”

That caught my eye because the last thing America needs is an Attorney General who wants to use this abuse of the right to be judged innocent until proven guilty. Civil forfeiture puts no limits on the seizure of anyone’s private property and financial holdings. It is a law that permits this to occur even if based on little more than conjecture. It struck me then and now as a bizarre and distinctly un-American law.

Writing in the Huffington Post in late 2014, Bob Barr, a former Congressman and the principal in Liberty Strategies, told of the passage of the Civil Asset Forfeiture Reform Act (CAFRA) in 2000 “as a milestone in the difficult—almost impossible—task of protecting individual rights against constant incursions by law-and-order officials.” The problem is that civil forfeiture was and is being used to seize millions.

“The staggering dollar amounts reflected in these statistics, however,” wrote Barr, “does not pinpoint the real problem of how law enforcement agencies at all levels of government employ the power of asset forfeiture as a means of harming, and in many instances, destroying the livelihood of individuals and small businesses.”

“In pursuing civil assets, the government need never charge the individuals with violations of criminal laws; therefore never having to prove beyond a reasonable doubt that they are guilty of having committed any crimes.”

As noted above, as the U.S. Attorney for the Eastern District of New York, Ms. Lynch’s office had raked in millions from civil forfeiture. Forbes magazine reports that she has used it in more than 120 cases and, prior to the hearing to confirm her as the next Attorney General US News & World Report noted on January 26 that Ms. Lynch’s office had quietly dropped a $450,000 civil forfeiture case a week before the hearings. She clearly did not want to answer questions on this or any other comparable case.

Just one example tells you why there is legitimate concern regarding this issue and it appeared in a January 3rd edition of Townhall.com. I recommend you read the account written by Amy Herrig, the vice president of Gas Pipe, Inc, a Texas company that an editor’s note reported as “faced with extinction of a civil asset forfeiture to the federal government of more than $16 million. Neither Herrig nor her father, Jerry Shults, have been charged with any criminal offense.”

Jerry Shults is a classic example of an American entrepreneur. After having served in the Air Force and serving in Vietnam where he earned a Bronze Star, Shults moved to Dallas where he began selling novelty items at pop festivals throughout Texas. Since the first store that he opened had gas pipes exposed in the ceiling, he dubbed it Gas Pipe, Inc. Suffice to say his hard work paid off for him. By the late 1990s, he had seven stores, a distribution company, a five-star lodge in Alaska, and was an American success story. By 2014 the company had grown to fourteen stores and other notable properties.

By then he had been in business for nearly 45 years and employed nearly two hundred people. And then someone in the northern district of Texas, Dallas division, initiated a civil forfeiture seizure against him. I was so appalled by his daughter’s description of events I secured a copy of the September 15 complaint that was filed. I am no attorney, but it looked to me as spurious as one could have imagined, except for the details of Gas Pipe’s assets. On 88 single-spaced pages, those were spelled out meticulously and all were subject to seizure despite the fact that not a single instance of criminality had been proven in a court of law. Imagine having 45 years of success erased by one’s own government in this fashion. It is appalling.

Assuming Ms. Lynch will be approved for confirmation as our next Attorney General, civil forfeiture is the largely hidden or unknown issue that could spell disaster for countless American businesses, large and small, in the remaining two years of the Obama administration. She has a record of pursuing it. The upside of this is that the current AG, Eric Holder, in early January announced that the DOJ would no longer acquire assets seized as part of a state law violation.

On the same day of Ms. Lynch’s hearing, January 28, writing in The Hill’s Congress Blog, former Representative Rick Boucher (D-VA) was joined by Bruce Mehlman, a former Assistant Secretary of Commerce in the George W. Bush administration, to raise a note of warning. “The topic of civil asset forfeiture should be an important part of the discussion with Lynch. As U.S. Attorney for the Eastern District of New York, Lynch was the top official in a hotbed of civil asset forfeiture—helping to bring in hundreds of millions of dollars under the program in recent years.”

Ms. Lynch was not asked about civil forfeiture by either the Republican or Democrat members of the Senate Judiciary Committee. It was a lost opportunity and, if the new Attorney General applies her enthusiasm for it to the entire nation, it will be yet another Obama administration nightmare.

© Alan Caruba, 2015.

Alan Caruba blogs daily at Warning Signs . http://factsnotfantasy.blogspot.com/  An author, business and science writer, he is the founder of National Anxiety Center . http://www.anxietycenter.com

Multiculturalism and “Anti-Semitism”: Thoughts Out of Season


By Paul Eidelberg

Savvy people know that multiculturalism is simply a fancy term for cultural relativism, which denies the existence of ideas and values that transcend space and time. Relativism holds that the validity of moral and philosophical ideas is limited to the cultural horizon in which they originate. But what has this to with “anti-Semitism”?

Anti-Semitism is a misnomer for Jew-hatred and Judaism, or “Judeophobia”. What does this really mean? Judeophobia is hatred of Israel. What underlies this hatred?

Judaism posits the idea that such is the plenitude of God that He creates, in addition to a vast number of unique individuals, many diverse of nations to reveal His infinite wisdom, power, and graciousness in every domain of existence. But to disseminate that knowledge, God has created a special nation for this purpose, Israel. This nation embodies two sets of laws. One set is intended for Jews. A subset of these laws, the Seven Laws of Noah (or the seven law of universal morality) is intended for all mankind. (I have elaborated on this subject in my book Toward a Renaissance of Israel and America: The Political Theology of Rabbi Eliyahu Benamozegh.)

Bearing the preceding in mind, Judaism provides an intellectual foundation for both monoculturalism and multiculturalism. It follows that anti-Semitism, understood as hatred of Jews and Judaism, has two dimensions. On the one hand, it rejects the monocultural aspect of Judaism – which is to reject the existence of Israel as a sovereign nation-state. On the other hand, it rejects the multicultural aspect of Judaism implicit in the Seven Noah Laws which apply to humanity as a whole.

What has replaced the Seven Noah Laws which apply to humanity as a whole is the academic doctrine of multicultural moral relativism. This doctrine rejects the existence of any universal laws of morality, hence of any trans-cultural or trans-historical standards of right and wrong, good and bad, justice and injustice.

From these thoughts out of season it follows that what is universally and egregiously called “anti-Semitism” should be replaced by the reality it obscures, namely, hatred of Jews and Judaism.

At the same time, what is called “multiculturalism” should be understood as a hidden form of hatred of Judaism if only because multiculturalism implies a rejection of the Seven Noahide Laws of Universal Morality.

By linking multiculturalism (now prevalent in America and Europe) with anti-Semitism redefined as hatred of Jews and Judaism, we can better understand the decay and decline of Western Civilization. Moreover, understanding multiculturalism as an indirect form of Jew-hatred – i.e., of Judaism’s universal laws of morality – conveys a deeper understanding of Islam’s fanatical hatred of Judaism and the West.

Islam, contrary to the Bible of Israel, rejects the concept of the nation state, hence the Bible’s liberal and human affirmation of diverse nations or cultures. But this Islamic rejection of the Bible’s positive affirmation of diverse nation-states is in fact a diminution or rejection the plenitude of God.

Moreover, Islam’s diminutive conception of God’s creativity is related to the Hebraic conception of man’s creation in the image of God. This Hebraic conception logically and ontologically entails an infinite Being who creates the vast multiplicity of unique individuals required to “relate His praise,” as stated in Isaiah (43:21): “This people I fashioned for Myself that they might relate my praise,” meaning God’s infinite wisdom, power, and graciousness in every domain of existence. This plenitude of God, which reconciles permanence and change (which is manifested in the Written and Oral Torah), requires diverse nation-states and an enormous variety of human beings to sanctify God’s Name.

An American Renaissance


by LAWRENCE SELLIN, PHD January 31, 2015

obama evil

The Obama years will be forever known as the Dark Ages of US history, a time of political, cultural and economic deterioration. We have yet to see if they will lead to the fall of the American republic.

In the Obama years, the lie became not only a campaign strategy or a means to enact damaging policies, but an institution of government; the Presidency itself, a lie of monstrous proportions guarded by the complicit and the willingly ignorant.

In the Obama years, the Congress finally clearly demonstrated that although we have elections, there is no longer a government representing its citizens, but an entity serving itself, operating outside of Constitutional constraints and unaccountable to the American people for the benefit of the few at the expense of the many.

In the Obama years, disseminating either disinformation or no information, a devoted media helped create the intellectual darkness and vacant servitude required to carry out the strategy of their leftist Messiah;  a country without any sense of its own history and traditions, where the low-information voter would slouch towards Obama’s imaginary utopia through a combination of governmental coercion and the hedonist nihilism of a painless, amusement-sodden, and stress-free America managed by a nanny-state.

In the Obama years, we see the resurrection of the economic feudalism of the Dark Ages, a system dominated by wealthy special interests that inhibit the upward mobility of the poor and the middle class.

In the Obama years, like during the Dark Ages, we witness the rise of Islamic hegemony and violence, the infiltration of the US government by the Muslim Brotherhood and the promotion of Sharia law in our schools and judicial system.

Renaissance literally means rebirth, a celebration of the human spirit and mankind’s potential for growth; a return to the ideals upon which the United States was founded, that is, a Constitution based on the Judeo-Christian values of Western civilization. Concomitantly, we should remember the sacrifices endured by our forebearers and reaffirm our commitment to preserve our way life as Joseph Story wrote in his 1833 Commentaries on the Constitution:

“Let the American youth never forget, that they possess a noble inheritance, bought by the toils, and sufferings, and blood of their ancestors; and capacity, if wisely improved, and faithfully guarded, of transmitting to their latest posterity all the substantial blessings of life, the peaceful enjoyment of liberty, property, religion, and independence.”

The framework of an American Renaissance is a restoration of the Constitution, in particular, 10th Amendment, which states:

“The powers not delegated to the United States by the Constitution, nor prohibited by it to the States, are reserved to the States respectively, or to the people.”

It is clear that members of Congress have largely not adhered to their oath to support and defend the Constitution. The solution, however, is not simply trying to elect more “good” people, who eventually get coopted or crushed by the system, but to create circumstances or incentives that oblige bad people to do the right thing.

The starting point should be limiting Congressional terms to a total of 12 years either in the House of Representatives or in the Senate or a combination thereof and abolishing all special benefits for members of Congress and government officials beyond those available to ordinary citizens.

Free enterprise is the most efficient system for the production of goods and services ever devised. Government is not. Federal taxation and regulations must be reduced to an absolute minimum to unleash the creative forces of the free market to power economic growth and increase jobs.

To increase growth and employment, it is essential to reduce the size of government by enacting, with the exception of defense, a yearly across-the-board 5% reduction in federal funding with the immediate elimination of the Departments of Homeland Security, Energy, Education and the Environmental Protection Agency.

The establishment of a simplified flat tax system for individuals and businesses would obviate the need for the Internal Revenue Service, removing its use as a political weapon and severely limiting the corrupting influence of lobbyists.

Other measures include: securing our borders and firm enforcement of current immigration laws; strictly applying Equal Opportunity against the discriminatory practices of affirmative action and diversity policies; declaring Sharia incompatible with the U.S. Constitution and making its public implementation in any form illegal; declaring English the one and only official language of the United States; rejecting political correctness and multiculturalism as an infringement of the rights guaranteed under the First Amendment and contrary to the American principle of E pluribus Unum.

An American Renaissance cannot be achieved, however, if we do not, as a country, speak the truth and recognize how far we have strayed from the Constitution, representative government and fiscal sanity.

Succinctly, we have a hopelessly corrupt political-media culture, which made possible a fraudulent and destructive Obama Administration.

Barack Obama came to office inexperienced, but armed with a dangerously subversive anti-American agenda designed to undermine the Constitution and the uniqueness and sacredness of the individual, where, through the exercise of his or her reason, one can discern the means necessary to secure life, liberty and the pursuit of happiness, unmediated by mullahs or government bureaucrats.

Unless we undertake a thorough exposition of who Obama really is, what is his background and true agenda, what forces made his unprecedented rise to power possible and who has conspired to hide the truth, an American Renaissance will not be forthcoming.

We are in a new Dark Age. In such situations, the record of history is unequivocal; either we produce a Renaissance, that is, a rebirth of the fundamental principles upon which America was founded or our republic dies.

Lawrence Sellin, Ph.D. is a retired colonel with 29 years of service in the US Army Reserve and a veteran of Afghanistan and Iraq. Colonel Sellin is the author of “Restoring the Republic: Arguments for a Second American Revolution “. He receives email at lawrence.sellin@gmail.com.

Read more: Family Security Matters http://www.familysecuritymatters.org/publications/detail/an-american-renaissance?f=must_reads#ixzz3QX6jWr5P
Under Creative Commons License: Attribution

Invoking God in Statesmanship


Prof. Paul Eidelberg

One of the most important ingredients of statesmanship is to foster national unity.  A prerequisite of national unity is the citizen’s belief that he and his fellow-citizens share supreme values. How did George Washington address this issue? Let’s consider a few words of his famous “Farewell Address,” America’s most important state paper.

He first reinforced belief in the value of national unity by appealing to the three motivating factors of human nature: sentiment, interests, and ideas. Accordingly, he points out that “With slight shades of difference, you have the same Religion, Manners, Habits and political Principles.” Religion is mentioned first.

Alexis de Tocqueville, the renowned author of Democracy in America, writes: “Religion in America takes no direct part in the government of society, but it must be regarded as the first of their political institutions; for if it does not impart a taste for freedom, it facilitates the use of it.” Americans, he said, combine the notions of religion and freedom so intimately in their minds that it is impossible to make them conceive the one without the other.” Hence, with the exception of Barack Obama, American presidents often invoke the name of God. In fact, the American Presidency Project website lists the whopping number of 10,984 presidential references to God, with only 267 to Jesus.

Unlike Israeli prime ministers, Arab leaders, in their ambition to gain control of the Land of Israel, frequently invoke the name of God—in their case, “Allah.” Even if they have murder in their hearts, their appeal to God (or “Allah”) sanctifies His name and thereby furthers the Arab cause vis-à-vis Israel whose leaders are unabashed secularists. Perhaps I am mistaken—and if so I apologize in advance—but Mr. Netanyahu rarely if ever invokes the name of God in a public address.

This goes to the heart of the Israel-Palestinian conflict. It underlies the failure of critics of the “peace process” to have any discernible effect on Israel’s government-sponsored territorial and spiritual shrinkage which began even before the 1993 Oslo or Israel-PLO Agreement.

No one can deny that the Arabs have made enormous gains since Anwar Sadat’s historic visit to Jerusalem in November 1977. Recall his speech in the Knesset, a speech broadcast to countless millions of people around the world.  In the first ten sentences of that speech Sadat intoned the name of God ten times!

Wonder of wonders, without firing a shot, Egypt recovered the Sinai with its Alma oil fields and sophisticated air bases—a $17 billion infrastructure developed by Jews. All this Egypt obtained in exchange for what Sadat scornfully called “a piece of paper.”

And when Yasser Arafat, exiled in Tunis, triumphantly marched into Gaza as a result of the Oslo Agreement and there spoke of the ultimate aims of the “Palestinians,” he, too, invoked he name of God on behalf of the Arab cause.  Behold the result:  The Arabs now control Gaza and PM Netanyahu has virtually yielded Judea and Samaria by endorsing a Palestinian state!

Turn, now, to the late King Hussein of Jordan.  Again and again Hussein intoned the name of God while calling for “peace and justice,” whether he was speaking from Amman or from Washington.  And lo and behold, in October 1994 he signed a peace treaty with Israel, in which treaty the godless government of Yitzhak Rabin rewarded Hussein with 330 square kilometers of Jewish land!

Arabs, inspired by “Allah” and confident in the justice of their cause, advance; Jews longing for peace and silent about God only retreat. Let us try to understand the Arab advance and the Jewish retreat in psychological terms.

Because Jews clamor only for peace, they make no serious demands on Arabs. Indeed, Israeli governments are ever making unilateral concessions. This can only arouse Arab contempt and encourage them to make more demands, however outrageous. But the Arabs are predisposed to make demands if only because they demand “peace and justice.”

Now justice involves a relation between persons and things.  In the present context, the persons are Arabs and Jews, while the things consist of land. Arab leaders vow they will not be satisfied until they possess all the Land of Israel. Contrast the Jews, satisfied with a mere strip of this land. The asymmetry is striking and ominous.

The Arab’s maximalist attitude, paraded in terms of justice, precludes justice.  So does the Jewish attitude, which is silent about justice. The Jews are also silent about Divine Justice, according to which the entire Land of Israel belongs to the Jewish People. The Jews want only peace, for which they are willing to give Arabs land. But peace, unlike land, is not a tangible thing. Justice in these terms is not possible. Only Divine Justice is possible, but this exalted idea does not animate Israel’s godless leaders.

Nevertheless, godless Jews have been desperately seeking a common ground with their Allah-inspired Arab enemies. The Jews would like to believe that Arabs, like themselves, fear violent death, hence war.  But Arab suicide-bombers tell a different story: they believe in paradise. Godless Jews do not—another asymmetry. As for religious Jews, they cling to life under the danger-to-life avoidance concept of “pekuach nefesh.”  So how can Jews, by yielding land, purchase peace from Arabs who love war and even death in the name of “Allah”?

But wait! God has given the Jews the best of enemies! This enemy exposes the artificial foundations of the present secular-Zionist State of Israel! Day after day the Jews of Israeli are being degraded by the insincerity, deviousness, and lack of moral courage exhibited by their prime ministers. We behold such leaders with increasing disgust – their lack of wholehearted dedication to that which alone justifies Israel’s existence: the God of Israel, the Torah of Israel, and the Land of Israel.

Sooner or later, Israel will vomit out these play actors who pretend to speak and act for the People of the Book.  Sooner or later, this People will rise up and restore God’s Holy Name in the domain of statecraft.