France – Farmers and Energy Costs Push Toward Confrontation


Posted originally on Apr 13, 2026 by Martin Armstrong |  

France is once again approaching a familiar breaking point, and energy is at the center of it. Diesel prices across Europe have surged sharply in 2026 as geopolitical tensions in the Middle East disrupted supply routes, pushing Brent crude back above key resistance levels and filtering directly into transport and agricultural costs. In France, non-road diesel, which is critical for farming, has risen substantially over the past year, eroding already thin margins in agriculture. At the same time, electricity costs remain elevated compared to pre-2022 levels, despite government intervention, leaving producers exposed to sustained input inflation.

The agricultural sector has been particularly vocal. France has roughly 400,000 farms, and many operate on margins that cannot absorb double-digit increases in fuel and fertilizer costs. Fertilizer itself is heavily energy-dependent, linking natural gas prices directly to food production costs. When energy rises, food prices follow, and this has already been reflected in EU food inflation, which peaked above 15% in recent cycles and remains structurally elevated. The knock-on effect is that farmers face higher input costs while consumers resist higher prices, compressing profitability from both sides.

Protests are building along these fault lines. Farmer unions and independent groups have threatened renewed blockades of highways, logistics hubs, and wholesale food markets if the government fails to provide further relief. France has a long-standing pattern of escalation where tractors are used to shut down key transport arteries, and authorities are well aware of how quickly localized demonstrations can become national disruptions. Previous rounds of protests have already forced Paris to roll out billions in subsidies and tax concessions, but those measures have not resolved the structural issue, which is energy dependence combined with policy constraints.

The French government continues to attempt targeted relief, including fuel rebates and caps on electricity prices, but these interventions are temporary by design. They do not change the underlying exposure to global energy markets. Once those supports are reduced or removed, the pressure returns immediately. That is why these protests tend to recur in waves rather than dissipate entirely.

Energy costs are no longer viewed as an external shock but as a failure of domestic policy to shield the population from volatility. When that perception takes hold, protests move beyond sector-specific demands and begin to question the direction of national leadership itself.

Agriculture & Global Cooling


Global Cooling

Posted originally on Apr 22, 2018 by Martin Armstrong

WHCBT Y Array 2017

QUESTION: Mr. Armstrong; Are you familiar with Professor Easterbrook of Western Washington University who agrees with you and is projecting a decline in temperatures for the next three decades? It seems that those who simply claim that it has been getting warmer live in a bubble of biased news. One even said to me that it has been getting warmer for the past 10,000 years because of civilization. I asked what was the solution? Should we just commit suicide to save the planet? Just can’t understand these people who deny there are cycles within every trend.

LR

Phanerozoic_Climate_Change

ANSWER: I know. We are closer to the lows than the historic highs in temperature. Our model does agree with Professor Easterbrook that the immediate decline in temperatures should extend out for about 43 years from 2007. It was unseasonably cold in Florida and snowed in the northern regions also for the first time since the Blizzard of 1899 and even that was about 120 years before. It was excessive snow and gold in Britain, Japan, and China, as well as Russia. They ignore these reports as one-time flukes.

The Global Warming crowd tries to deny that there are also cycles set in motion by the Sun and they attribute everything to human activity. Nobody wants air we cannot breathe. I lived in London back in the 1980s when the busses were blowing out diesel. It was horrible. But to stop pollution by distorting history or claiming the trend is really warmer for 10,000 years is the danger. That is like saying the Dow Jones Industrials is only in a bull market since 1932 pretending there are no corrections.  We must understand that nature is bigger than we are and the Sun just maybe the majority of climate change.

800,000-year Ice-Core Records of Atmospheric Carbon Dioxide (CO2)

Global Warming Cyclical

There have simply been historical periods with far greater amounts of CO2 than today. Pollution is a separate issue from blaming everything on CO2. There is absolutely NO EVIDENCE that CO2 changes the climate. The ice core sample demonstrates that there have been periods of significantly higher levels of CO2 before civilization. There is a natural cycle of everything. Their analysis is always to deny a cycle and presume whatever trend is in motion will remain in motion. With this analysis, I am alive today the same as yesterday so therefore this trend will last forever.

President Trump On His Historic Announcement To Combat The Autism Crisis


Posted originally on Rumble on By Bannon’s War Room on: September, 22, 2025

Mary Holland: President Trump Is Staking His Presidency On Ending The Autism Epidemic


Posted originally on Rumble on By Bannon’s War Room on: September, 22, 2025

Moms Of Autistic Children Give Their Personal Accounts Of Dealing With Autism


Posted originally on Rumble on By Bannon’s War Room on: September, 22, 2025

President Trump And Secretary Kennedy Announce Historic Steps To Confront The Autism Crisis


Posted originally on Rumble on By Bannon’s War Room on: September, 22, 2025

Charlie Kirk: Legacy Remembered-President Trump


Posted originally on Rumble on By Bannon’s War Room on: September, 22, 2025

Episode 4796: Massive Announcement Coming Today On The Autism Epidemic


Posted originally on Rumble on By Bannon’s War Room on: September, 22, 2025

Fluoride – Is America’s Drinking Water Safe?


Posted originally on Nov 8, 2024 By Martin Armstrong 

Water faucet

Robert F. Kennedy Jr. may now Make America Healthy Again. One of his first measures will be removing “an industrial waste product” from America’s water supply that has been deliberately added since 1945.

On January 25, 1945, Grand Rapids, Michigan, began water fluoridation. By 1960, water fluoridation had reached 50 million households and doubled to 100 million by 1975. Why? The government began adding fluoride to the water based on a 1930s study that stated a small amount of NATURALLY OCCURRING fluoride could protect teeth from decay.

It is odd that the government does not force insurance companies to treat teeth as a medical expense. It is difficult to gauge if these measures have actually prevented tooth decay, as access to dental health is far greater now than it was when trials began in the 1930s and 1940s. Who is responsible for adding fluoride to the water? California, Delaware, Georgia, Illinois, Kentucky, Louisiana, Minnesota, Mississippi, Nebraska, Nevada, Ohio, and South Dakota have state mandates requiring fluoridated water. Other states like Maine, Utah, and New Hampshire permit the public to vote. Water utilities companies are responsible for maintaining water fluoridation systems. The EPA has federal oversight over the process and set a maximum contaminant level for fluoride at 4.0 mg/L. The Safe Drinking Water Act of 1974 forbids the EPA from actually mandating fluoride or any additive substances to the water supply, but they do have oversight.

So what’s the problem? “On January 20, the Trump White House will advise all U.S​. water systems to remove fluoride from public water. Fluoride is an industrial waste associated with arthritis, bone fractures, bone cancer, IQ loss, neurodevelopmental disorders, and thyroid disease,” Kennedy posted on X. Kennedy believes that fluoride does not have a clear health benefit to the public, but it is responsible for causing an array of life-altering ailments.

On September 25, 2024, a federal court in California ruled against the Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) in a case involving fluoride. The court said that current levels of fluoride violate the Toxic Substances Control Act. Judge Edward Chen declared that there is “substantial and scientifically credible evidence” that fluoride poses a serious health risk and emphasized concern over fluorides effect on the developing brains of infants.

“In all, there is substantial and scientifically credible evidence establishing that fluoride poses a risk to human health; it is associated with a reduction in the IQ of children and is hazardous at dosages that are far too close to fluoride levels in the drinking water of the United States,” the judge wrote in his ruling.

The National Institutes of Health’s toxicology program produced a study that found a correlation between fluoride and lower IQ in children.

“The NTP monograph concluded that higher levels of fluoride exposure, such as drinking water containing more than 1.5 milligrams of fluoride per liter, are associated with lower IQ in children. The NTP review was designed to evaluate total fluoride exposure from all sources and was not designed to evaluate the health effects of fluoridated drinking water alone. It is important to note, however, that there were insufficient data to determine if the low fluoride level of 0.7 mg/L currently recommended for U.S. community water supplies has a negative effect on children’s IQ.”

The CDC, American Dental Association, American Pediatric Association, and every BIG health agency would like to ignore these serious health risks. These organizations showed their hand during COVID and are not to be trusted. How can we possibly turn a blind eye to the blatant health crisis facing America when we have clear evidence that government agencies are permitting Americans to be poisoned? Kennedy’s health crusade could possibly help America lose its title of the least healthy nation in the developed world.

RFK Jr Says, “President Trump Has Promised me Control of the Public Health Agencies”


Posted originally on the CTH on October 30, 2024 | Sundance

Continuing a seemingly ridiculous need to speak about private conversations with President Trump, Robert F Kennedy Jr has created quite a stir by telling his supporters that President Trump has promised him “control over the public health agencies.”

In a video chat with his supporters, obtained by the Wall Street Journal, RFK Jr says he will have control over Health and Human Services (HHS), and the sub agencies of CDC, FDA, NIH and the USDA.  While there is no reason to doubt the validity of what RFK Jr is saying, there is no reasonable purpose for him to be talking about specific positions, plans and objectives this close to the election.  Why can’t this jack rabbit just keep his mouth closed?  WATCH:  

.

Suspicious Cat continues to be, well, suspicious.