CTH is finding it difficult to dismiss the likelihood that both Democrat and Republican corporate club members are intentionally working to make the border crisis worse in an effort to fracture the base of support for President Trump… That purchased approachseems in line with Tom Donohue’s Big Club strategy.

Earlier today President Trump tweeted about the growing crisis at the U.S-Mexico border. Additionally this follows after he answered a press question yesterday about closing some of the border entry points:

Q Mr. President, if you close the border, would it be to all trade? Would you close the border to trade?

THE PRESIDENT: It could be to all trade. Mexico is making absolutely a fortune with the United States. They have a trade surplus of over $100 billion, which is far bigger than anybody understands. They’ve had it for many years. And either they’re going to stop — they have the strongest immigration laws anywhere in the world. And we have the weakest, the most pathetic laws. Number one, Congress has to act. And number two, Mexico — they make so much money from the United States and so many other things, so many other assets, they have to grab it and they have to stop it.

We have, right now, two big caravans coming up from Guatemala. Massive caravans walking right through Mexico. So, Mexico is tough. They can stop them, but they chose not to. Now they’re going to stop them. And if they don’t stop them, we’re closing the border. They’ll close it. And we’ll keep it closed for a long time. I’m not playing games. Mexico has to stop it. They have people coming right through Mexico. It’s a long, very dangerous journey. Mexico sends busses, they send trucks, they do absolutely — they started, at one point, a little bit — stopping. They don’t do anything to stop it right now.

So the caravan has formed. I’ve ended payments to Guatemala, to Honduras, and to El Salvador. No money goes there anymore. We were giving them $500 million. We were giving them tremendous aid. We stopped payment to Honduras, to Guatemala, and to El Salvador. We were paying them tremendous amounts of money, and we’re not paying them anymore because they haven’t done a thing for us.

They set up these caravans. In many cases, they put their worst people in the caravan; they’re not going to put their best in. They get rid of their problems. And they march up here, and then they’re coming into their country; we’re not letting them in our country.

Our Border Patrol, the job they’ve done, is incredible. The job that ICE is doing is incredible. And we have run out of space. We can’t hold people anymore. And Mexico can stop it so easily. They don’t go through a court system every time somebody steps on our land. You step on our land: “Welcome to the United States.” It’s ridiculous.

So Congress — and I know you guys are going to work hard on it — but Congress has to fix our broken immigration laws. We’re the laughing stock all over the world. People pour into this country and we stop them because Border Patrol is so incredible. But there’s a point at which you can’t stop them anymore. We have no detention space, no nothing.

So, Guatemala, Honduras, El Salvador have done nothing. Mexico has done nothing. And I’ll tell you something: Colombia — you have your new President of Colombia. Really good guy. I’ve met him. We had him at the White House. He said how he’s going to stop drugs. More drugs are coming out of Colombia right now than before he was President. So he has done nothing for us.

Okay. Thank you very much.

Q Will you put DACA back on the table to speed up deportations?

THE PRESIDENT: It’s in the Supreme Court right now. After the Supreme Court.

(press conference link)

.

Steve Bannon appears on CNBC to discuss the economic objectives of China and how President Trump and USTR Lighthizer are confronting three very important convergences.

Bannon does a good job outlining the three Chinese priorities: ¹One-belt, one road; ²Made in China 2025; and ³Huawei 5G rollout; and how those efforts conflict with U.S. interests.

White House economic advisor Larry Kudlow made some news yesterday when he said he would like to see the Fed cut interest rates by half a point (.50%).  Director Kudlow then appeared on CNBC for a discussion of the economy and the United States’ ongoing trade discussions with China and Mexico.

The larger story is actually about the current state of the U.S. economy as Trump’s policies influence direct investment and re-establish a middle-class durable goods manufacturing sector. WATCH:

.

In essence we are in that economic space where Trump has de-emphasized the Wall Street economy (multinational corps, investments and financials) and re-emphasized the Main Street economy (manufacturing, blue collar jobs).  The new trade deals represent an unusual economic paradox for Wall St.  National corporations thrive; however multinational corporations and their investment instruments can simultaneously suffer.

We can tell we are in the space between both of these economies, because actions by the Fed are having no impact on inflation.  Consumer prices are returning back to their natural dynamic.  I’m reposting an article below from December 2016, right after the 2016 election, because this odd economic landscape -while new- was entirely predictable.  I called it the “Third Dimension in American Economics“.

Keep in mind this was written in December 2016, before President Trump took office.  Our current location is now over two years into the shift from favoring a Wall Street engine, to favoring a Main Street engine.   I hope you find this helpful…

[December 2016] Traditional economic principles have revolved around the Macro and Micro with interventionist influences driven by GDP (Gross Domestic Product, or total economic output), interest rates, inflation rates and federally controlled monetary policy designed to steer the broad economic outcomes.

Additionally, in large measure, the various data points which underline Macro principles are two dimensional. As the X-Axis goes thus, the Y-Axis responds accordingly… and so it goes…. and so it has historically gone.

Traditional monetary policy has centered upon a belief of cause and effect: (ex.1) If inflation grows, it can be reduced by rising interest rates. Or, (ex.2) as GDP shrinks, it too can be affected by decreases in interest rates to stimulate investment/production etc.

However, against the backdrop of economic Globalism -vs- economic Americanism, CTH is noting the two dimensional economic approach is no longer a relevant model. There is another economic dimension, a third dimension. An undiscovered depth or distance between the “X” and the “Y”.

I believe it is critical to understand this new dimension in order to understand Trump economic principles, and the subsequent “America-First” economy he’s building.

As the distance between the X and Y increases over time, the affect detaches – slowly and almost invisibly. I believe understanding this hidden distance perspective will reconcile many of the current economic contractions. I also predict this third dimension will soon be discovered and will be extremely consequential in the coming decade.

To understand the basic theory, allow me to introduce a visual image to assist comprehension. Think about the two economies, Wall Street (paper or false economy) and Main Street (real or traditional economy) as two parallel roads or tracks. Think of Wall Street as one train engine and Main Street as another.

The Metaphor – Several decades ago, 1980-ish, our two economic engines started out in South Florida with the Wall Street economy on I-95 the East Coast, and the Main Street economy on I-75 the West Coast. The distance between them less than 100 miles.

As each economy heads North, over time the distance between them grows. As they cross the Florida State line Wall Street’s engine (I-95) is now 200 miles from Main Street’s engine (traveling I-75).

As we have discussed – the legislative outcomes, along with the monetary policy therein, follows the economic engine carrying the greatest political influence. Our historic result is monetary policy followed the Wall Street engine.

[…] there had to be a point where the value of the second economy (Wall Street) surpassed the value of the first economy (Main Street).

Investments, and the bets therein, needed to expand outside of the USA. hence, globalist investing.

However, a second more consequential aspect happened simultaneously. The politicians became more valuable to the Wall Street team than the Main Street team; and Wall Street had deeper pockets because their economy was now larger.

As a consequence Wall Street started funding political candidates and asking for legislation that benefited their interests.

When Main Street was purchasing the legislative influence the outcomes were beneficial to Main Street, and by direct attachment those outcomes also benefited the average American inside the real economy.

When Wall Street began purchasing the legislative influence, the outcomes therein became beneficial to Wall Street. Those benefits are detached from improving the livelihoods of main street Americans because the benefits are “global” needs. Global financial interests, investment interests, are now the primary filter through which the DC legislative outcomes are considered.

There is a natural disconnect. (more)

Here is an example of the resulting impact as felt by consumers:

♦ TWO ECONOMIES – Time continues to pass as each economy heads North.

Economic Globalism expands. Wall Street’s false (paper) economy becomes the far greater economy. Federal fiscal policy follows and fuels the larger economy. In turn the Wall Street benefactors pay back the politicians.

Economic Nationalism shrinks. Main Street’s real (traditional) economy shrinks. Domestic manufacturing drops. Jobs are off-shored. Main Street companies try to offset the shrinking economy with increased productivity (the fuel). Wages stagnate.

Now it’s 1990 – The Wall Street economic engine (traveling I-95) reaches Northern North Carolina. However, it’s now 500 miles away from Main Street’s engine (traveling I-75). The Appalachian range is the geographic wedge creating the natural divide (a metaphor for ‘trickle down’).

By the time the decade of 2000 arrives – Wall Street’s well fueled engine, and the accompanying DC legislative attention, influence and monetary policy, has reached Philadelphia.

However, Main Street’s engine is in Ohio (they’re now 700 miles apart) and almost out of fuel; there simply is no more productivity to squeeze.

From that moment in time, and from that geographic location, all forward travel is now only going to push the two economies further apart. I-95 now heads North East, and I-75 heads due North through Michigan. The distance between these engines is going to grow much more significantly now with each passing mile/month….

However, and this is a key reference point, if you are judging their advancing progress from a globalist vessel (filled with traditional academic economists) in the mid-Atlantic, both economies (both engines) would seem to be essentially in the same place based on their latitude.

From a two-dimensional linear perspective you cannot tell the distance between them.

It is within this distance between the two economies, which grew over time, where a new economic dimension has been created and is not getting attention. It is critical to understand the detachment.

Within this three dimensional detachment you understand why Near-Zero interest rates no longer drive an expansion of the GDP. The Main Street economic engine is just too far away to gain any substantive benefit.

Despite their domestic origin in NY/DC, traditional fiscal policies (over time) have focused exclusively on the Wall Street, Globalist economy. The Wall Street Economic engine was simply seen as the only economy that would survive. The Main Street engine was viewed by DC, and those who assemble the legislative priorities therein, as a dying engine, lacking fuel, and destined to be service driven only….

Within the new 3rd economic dimension, the distance between Wall Street and Main Street economic engines, you will find the data to reconcile years of odd economic detachment.

Here’s where it gets really interesting. Understanding the distance between the real Main Street economic engine and the false Wall Street economic engine will help all of us to understand the scope of an upcoming economic lag; which, rather remarkably I would add, is a very interesting dynamic.

Think about these engines doing a turn about and beginning a rapid reverse. GDP can, and in my opinion, will, expand quickly. However, any interest rate hikes (fiscal policy) intended to cool down that expansion -fearful of inflation- will take a long time to traverse the divide.

Additionally, inflation on durable goods will be insignificant – even as international trade agreements are renegotiated. Why? Simply because the originating nations of those products are going to go through the same type of economic detachment described above.

Those global manufacturing economies will first respond to any increases in export costs (tariffs etc.), by driving their own productivity higher as an initial offset, in the same manner American workers went through in the past two decades. The manufacturing enterprise and the financial sector remain focused on the pricing.

♦ Inflation on imported durable goods sold in America, while necessary, will ultimately be minimal during this initial period; and expand more significantly as time progresses and off-shored manufacturing finds less and less ways to be productive. Over time, durable good prices will increase – but it will come much later.

♦ Inflation on domestic consumable goods ‘may‘ indeed rise at a faster pace. However, it can be expected that U.S. wage rates will respond faster, naturally faster, than any fiscal policy because inflation on fast-turn consumable goods become re-coupled to the ability of wage rates to afford them.

The fiscal policy impact lag, caused by the distance between federal fiscal action and the domestic Main Street economy, will now work in our favor. That is, in favor of the middle-class.

Within the aforementioned distance between “X” and “Y”, a result of three decades traveled by two divergent economic engines, is our new economic dimension….

Last night President Trump called-in to Sean Hannity for an extensive interview.  Here’s the transcript from that interview (sorry for the delay):

Mr. President, thank you for taking time for being with us tonight.

DONALD TRUMP, PRESIDENT (via telephone): Well, thank you, Sean, very much. It’s an honor.

HANNITY: I appreciate you being here.

You really have not had an opportunity to react, to respond to the Mueller report, the A.G.’s letter, that summarized the report that exonerated you. No collusion after all these years, as you have been claiming. He left the decision as it relates to obstruction to the attorney general and deputy attorney general. They quickly said, no, that does not rise to the level.

And I wanted to get your reaction.

TRUMP: Well, we are very happy about it. It’s gone on for a long time, almost since the beginning of my term, and you know, if you look at it, we’ve done so much despite that. But it was a cloud. It was a cloud that most people didn’t believe, fortunately.

They spent more than $30 million, hundreds of interviews of people, in some cases very innocent people that were put through the ringer. Millions of document pages, millions and millions of document pages, and after that, there was no collusion, there was no obstruction. It was such a ridiculous thing that happened.

On the other hand, you know, you look at, how did this start? How did it start? You had dirty cops. You had people that are about FBI folks.

I know so many. They are incredible people. But at the top, they were not clean, to put it mildly. And what they did to our country was a terrible, terrible thing.

HANNITY: Mr. President, we talked a lot on this program about the FISA abuse scandal. And this is what we know, that in August of 2016, we know Bruce Ohr warned everybody at the DOJ and the FBI that Christopher Steele hated you, that Hillary Clinton paid for the dossier, that it was not verified. But still in October, and then three renewal application warrants approved, they were told by the Grassley-Graham memo, the bulk of information came from that phony dossier. Andrew McCabe said, no dossier, no FISA warrant.

There were Russian lies disseminated to the American people before the election, but it also violated the rights of Carter Page and gave a backdoor into your campaign for spying, which I know the media made fun of at the time, when you said it happened.

TRUMP: Well, when I said there could be somebody spying on my campaign, a lot of things happened. It was like — it went wild out there. They couldn’t believe that I could say such a thing.

And as it turned out, that was a small potatoes compared to what went on. When you look at what happened, and when it happened, and the money that was spent, the millions and millions on the phony dossier, and then they used the dossier to start things, and there was no truth whatsoever. It was a fraud and paid for by Hillary Clinton and paid for by the Democrats and the DNC. It’s hard to believe.

If you wrote this as a novel, no one would buy it. It would be a failure because it will be too unbelievable. Nobody would believe it’s possible, the things that went on.

And we’re getting to the bottom of it, and it’s got to be — I mean, you can never allow this to happen to another president. This can never, ever happen to a president again, Sean. That was a disgrace and an embarrassment our country, that they were allowed to get away with this. Hopefully, they won’t get away with it.

HANNITY: Do you now feel vindicated? Was there anything that the attorney general’s report — I know you have called for obviously the whole Mueller memo to be released, did anything surprise you? And what about the people that were collateral damage in all of this?

TRUMP: Well, people were hurt so badly, so badly. Their lives have been ruined and over — you know, over something that should have never taken place, an investigation that should have never happened. There was no crime, as you know.

You’re only allowed to do this legally if there is a crime. There was no crime. They’ve all admitted it. Comey, who is a terrible guy, Comey and McCabe and Strzok and Page, the lover, Page, and all of these people, they’ve admitted in testimony that there was no crime. So they’d started an investigation based on no crime.

I will say this, our new attorney general, Bill Barr, is a great gentleman. I’ve heard about him for years. He’s a great man. Had he been there initially, this all would not have happened because what has gone on there is just a disgrace to our country.

HANNITY: Mr. President —

TRUMP: So, but a lot of — a lot of innocent people were hurt very badly, and it’s very, very sad actually.

HANNITY: For this to never happen again, what do you think the path is to getting to that point? In other words, the checks and balances that you believe need to be put in place so that a FISA court, in this case, it is not told Hillary paid for Russian lies, its own author doesn’t stand by it, but yet it was used to obtain four FISA warrants that it gave a backdoor to your campaign.

What do you think needs to happen to prevent this from ever happening again? What checks and balances, and what should be pursued or not pursued in your opinion?

TRUMP: Well, I’m going to leave that to our new attorney general, who has been so incredible, actually. That’s based on a lot of people saying, this is a very, very special person. That’s what you need in that position. That’s a very important position.

You need so many different — you need genius, you need rationality, you need different levels of good.

And I’m also going to leave it to Lindsey Graham. He’s head of Judiciary and Senate and a very, very good guy and a very smart guy. You know, I’m just going to let them do whatever they want to do, and I would imagine they don’t like what they see, to put it mildly. But you would have to ask them.

I think it is much more appropriate — I purposely did not want to involve myself in this whole thing. I wanted to let other people do it. And I wish he didn’t take so long. You know, we are talking about really longer than, if you think about it, longer than Mueller — it was many months before that that Strzok and Page were talking about the insurance policy, right?

The insurance policy — just in case Hillary Clinton lost, they wanted an insurance policy against me. And what we were playing out until just recently was the insurance policy. They wanted to do a subversion. It was treason. It was really treason.

If the Republican Party had done this to the Democrats, if we had done this to President Obama, you’d have 100 people in jail right now and it would be treason. It would be considered treason and they’d be in jail for the rest of their lives.

But it worked out the other way, and, you know, it just is really a horrible situation. And an incredible outcome, or certainly very close to an outcome, and we’ll have to see how it all started. But I’m going to leave that to other people, including the attorney general, and others, to make a determination.

But it’s very, very important for our country to know, because in 50 years from now, and 100 years from now, if someone tries the same thing, they have to know that the penalty will be very, very great, if and when they get caught.

HANNITY: Before I get to the media question, would you consider, sir, a pardon? Look at General Flynn, for example, or Papadopoulos, who has had to spend 12 days in jail.

Is that something that you would consider at some point?

TRUMP: Well, as I told you, many, many people were hurt, incredibly hurt by this whole scam, just a scam. But it’s much worse than that. It’s at the highest level, and the importance is so — what it meant our country, it’s a very, very dark period, and I think maybe we are shedding a lot of light. We are going to come into a bright, beautiful, sunny day.

But when you mention General Flynn, he was a man who had an incredible record in the military, you see what happened to him. The FBI said he wasn’t lying, as I understand it, and if the Mueller group said he was lying, and you know what he has gone through, and what so many others have gone through. I could name names that would just go on for the entire — your entire show.

It’s a very, very sad thing. I don’t want to talk about pardons now but I can say, it’s so sad on so many levels.

HANNITY: Let me ask you, I believe you probably have forever branded fake news fake news. I’m not sure if some of these companies will ever recover. I talked earlier in my monologue about, I don’t really recall them ever talking about record accomplishments, record low unemployment, African- Americans, Hispanic Americans, Asian-Americans, women in the workplace, youth unemployment, I mean, some really amazing numbers.

But I see every second, minute, hour, every day, there are attacks. I will tell you a small snippet. I’m only picking one network in this case, CNN. And just a small snippet of some of the coverage and speculation and things that have been said about you and want to get your reaction.

(BEGIN VIDEO CLIP)

UNIDENTIFIED MALE: Russian operatives claim to have compromising personal and financial information about Mr. Trump.

UNIDENTIFIED MALE: We are looking at the possibility that the president of the United States and those around him during the election campaign colluded with a hostile foreign power to undermine the basis of our democracy.

UNIDENTIFIED MALE: This is evidence of willingness to commit collusion.

UNIDENTIFIED MALE: It does look like collusion, it does look like he’s listening to Putin more than he is American intelligence.

UNIDENTIFIED MALE: So, this picture that the president is so desperate to avoid, this picture of collusion, begins to fill in.

UNIDENTIFIED MALE: The president sees the walls are closing in and he’s lashing out.

UNIDENTIFIED MALE: He’s desperate. He’s obviously flailing around because he feels the walls closing in.

(END VIDEO CLIP)

HANNITY: Mr. President, I could play an hour’s worth of coverage of that, for two years it’s gone on.

What is your answer? What is a reaction to the media? I know you have been very critical. Fake news. Yes?

TRUMP: As many people have said, and fortunately we have had some incredible people that really were fair. When you mentioned Rush or Mark – – Mark Levin, or Steve Doocy, and Ainsley in the morning, and Brian and Laura, Jesse, Jeanine — I hope Jeanine’s back soon.

HANNITY: She’s back Saturday.

TRUMP: So many people. I don’t want to keep going because I’m going to leave out some people. I could again go so long. So many great people have been — you know, they get it.

Nobody has been tougher, nobody, on Russia than me. And everybody — my enemies say that, when they are reasonable enemies, when they are fair.

You look at the pipeline, exposing that going into Germany. You look at oil with the number one — I mean, it is what we have done with energy, and oil and gas and that is all competition from — for Russia.

You look at the Ukraine, you look at so many different levels. You look at our military. Look at the fact that we would have been powered by wind, which wouldn’t have worked, by the way, because it only blows it sometimes, and lots of problems come about.

But we are stronger now as a country then we have ever been. We are doing better financially than we have ever done, our markets are hitting records all the time. I have many, many records of the highest stock market. People’s 401(k)s are doing better than they have ever done by far. It’s up almost 50 percent from the time I am elected president.

And other countries are way down. You look at China as an example, we are negotiating a deal with China. We’re going to make a very good deal with China. China is way down. We are way up.

But nobody has been tougher to Russia or on Russia than Donald Trump, President Trump. Nobody even close.

And yet, with all of that, we want to have a great relationship with Russia. We want to have a great relationship with China. All of these things are smart to do. We’ll do great with it. But nobody has been tougher.

And when I watched all of this nonsense, it was fake news, just terrible fake news, the good news is, based on polls and based on other things, based on where we stand now with the public, Sean, the people never bought it. They get what’s happening.

Our country is doing fantastically well. More regulations cut than any other president, and that’s only in two years. Nobody’s come even close.

The big tax cuts, so many things we are going to do, incredible health care that the Democrats, frankly, wouldn’t even know how to do. We all become the party of health care, the party of really good health care.

We’ve done so much and we have so much planned. So when I had to listen to CNN, which is so, so fake, so horribly fake, I would just — I wouldn’t listen often — believe me, I wouldn’t want to listen often. But whenever I did, whenever I thought, I have never seen anything like it. And MSNBC, the same thing.

The good news is, I heard their ratings last night, both of them were — they dropped off the folder. They dropped to a level that nobody could believe because now that they see the Mueller report, where you look at their finding — I mean, the finding was very, very strong. No collusion, no obstruction, no Russia, no nothing. And it’s great.

I notice your record, you had virtually record ratings last night. So, that’s because you have credibility.

So I want to thank Fox. I want to thank some of those people I just named, but also many others, they have been so fantastic to me, and really to our country.

And I really do. They’re really amazing people, great people. And it wasn’t so easy for them.

HANNITY: Mr. President, one thing I do point out often, and I honestly don’t see it elsewhere in the media, you did keep your promise on your tax cuts. You did such records, ending bureaucratic regulation, judges, energy independence, trade deals, being tough on Iran, Jerusalem is now the capital, all those things.

I want to ask you especially, in a minute, about immigration and health care. But I want to just first run down some names and get your thoughts. James Comey tonight in an interview suggested, well, maybe he was fired for obstruction But I just played a tape of him saying that he could be fired anytime for any reason or no reason, which – so your thoughts on James Comey?

TRUMP: Well, he’s right about that. For any reason – if you look at Article II, for any reason. But despite that, that was an incorrect statement. And when you say what I said, there was nothing said wrong there, but they didn’t play the whole interview. When they play the whole thing, you see it exactly.

I mean, the fact is, it would only get worse. And I said this. It would only get worse if I fired him. I knew that it was going to get worse, not better. I’m not going to fire him and everything goes away. It would be a bigger deal if I fired him, and I knew that. So it was a negative, not a positive. And everybody knew that. But NBC didn’t want to play it that way. They wanted to play it a different way.

And when you talk about people that are dishonest and when you talk about bad, fake news, NBC, where we had The Apprentice for many years as one of their most successful shows, NBC is as bad as CNN, I can tell you that.

HANNITY: Let me ask you. Adam Schiff is saying there’s still collusion. By the way, I think one of the funniest tapes I’ve played in the show ever is the hoax, then you have a Russian talking about compromising material on a naked Trump, which is – again, talk about – and he thinks it’s shown to Putin, and he’s literally colluding to get information so that he can impact our electoral system. But he’s still to this day. Now, prior to the Mueller conclusion that there was no collusion, none, and it was quoted in the Attorney General’s report. We had a nine-month FBI investigation. They said no collusion.

TRUMP: Right.

HANNITY: Lisa Page and Peter Strzok said no collusion. The Senate Committee said no collusion. The House Committee said no collusion. That’s all before two years of Mueller. But yet, this guy is still pushing this conspiracy theory. Thoughts on Adam Schiff.

TRUMP: Well, Schiff is a bad guy because he knew he was lying. I mean, he’s not a dummy. And he knew he was lying. And for a year-and-a-half, he’d go on and just lie and lie and leak and call up CNN and others and just – you know, I watch him, so sanctimonious, and gets on and says, oh, well, we want to talk about Russia. He knew it was a lie, and he’d get into the backroom with his friends in the Democrat Party, and they would laugh like hell at what they were doing. That’s a disgrace. And he knew it was a lie. And therefore, in one way, you could say it’s a crime what he did because he was giving, I mean, horrible – making horrible statements that he knew were false.

And frankly, I heard they should force him off the committee or off the committee chair. He should be forced out of office. He is a disgrace to our country. And you have plenty of others. But he would go on night-after- night talking about collusion, the collusion delusion.

And I will tell you this about Russia. If they had anything on me, it would have come out a long time ago, probably a long time before I ran because they would have been better off, much better off. And I hope we really get along well with them, but they would have been a lot better off with Hillary Clinton as President. In terms of energy, in terms of oil and gas, look at what we’re doing with the energy. It’s incredible in our country. But that’s a bad thing–

HANNITY: First time in 75 years. So–

TRUMP: –because of tremendous competition for Russia. Hillary wouldn’t have let you drill. There’d be no oil, there’d be no gas, there’d be no anything to compete. Russia, if they were at all for me – and by the way, if you look at all of the things, they were sort of for and against both, not just one way. But you look at all of the different things, Russia would much rather have Hillary than Donald Trump. I can tell you that right now.

HANNITY: You after the election – I remember, and I was a little surprised because I know that a lot of the crowds – and you’ve had a lot of big crowds who chanted “lock her up” on Hillary. And after the election, you said, “You know what? Let’s move on.” Do you feel that way today?

TRUMP: No, not really. I did feel that way very much. The night I won, they were all screaming “lock her up, lock her up.” Look, she lost 33 – they deleted 33,000 emails, and they were – BleachBit. That’s a big deal and it’s a very expensive process, and almost nobody does it because it’s so expensive. But that’s the way you really get rid of it. So she deleted 33,000 emails. Can you imagine if I did that? Supposing I did that, I gave millions of pages to these people that were–

HANNITY: 1.5 million.

TRUMP: –I mean, in one case, was involved with the Clinton Foundation, in another case, Weissmann. You know all about Weissmann, and many others. We gave millions of pages. They found nothing. If they would have found one bad sentence out of millions of pages, believe me, it would have been front and center. It would have been front and center. But it’s true.

When I – on November 8, 2016, one of the great nights that a lot of people have had because they came from the hills and the mountains, they came from the valleys, they came from everywhere, Sean. And it was an incredible evening. And they’ve been rewarded because our job numbers, our unemployment numbers, all of the numbers that they really wanted are the best we’ve ever had.

But I will say this. I said, “You know, let’s get back on, let’s not think about the past, let’s think about the future.” But now I think thinking about the past is just OK because we can never let this happen again in our country or to another President. I’m not talking about me. I’m talking into the future, we can never allow this treasonous – these treasonous acts to happen to another President. This was an attempted takeover of our government, of our country, an illegal takeover. And if it were the other way around, where I was doing it to President Obama or a Democrat, it would be virtually the maximum sentence that you can find no matter where you look in whatever legal book.

HANNITY: Let me ask you now, I was very critical of the team that Robert Mueller put together. You mentioned Andrew Weissmann – I’ve gone through his record – was at Hillary Clinton’s victory party. Only Democratic donors, no Republicans at all, no Republican donors, and also Jeannie Rhee who worked for the Clinton Foundation as a lawyer was appointed. How do you feel about Mueller today? And were you surprised at all, considering the team that he picked in this particular case? It seemed pretty partisan Democrat. And I thought it was extraordinarily unfair to pick that biased a team.

TRUMP: Yeah, it didn’t seem to be biased. It was biased. I mean, it was–

HANNITY: That’s a good point.

TRUMP: –tremendously anti-Trump. It was never-Trumpers, and it was anti- Trump. I think in every single instance. I know that Andrew Weissmann was at her – I guess you’d call it the wake, which was the big evening on November 8th. He was there to celebrate – to celebrate a victory. And he was there, and not a happy camper. But these were people that contributed, most of them contributed to her campaign. I mean, it was shocking to see it.

So – I wasn’t exactly sure. I know one thing. I had nothing to do with Russia. But I wasn’t exactly – when I looked at the team that was assembled, I wasn’t exactly sure what they would – maybe they’d take a sentence from here and a sentence from there, I had no idea. I know one thing. I was the most innocent human being. And they all said it. Even Comey said he found no wrongdoing when – in one of the few times he didn’t lie because he lied in front of Congress. Brennan lied. Many of these people lied to Congress, and nothing happened. And yet, with Flynn, where they didn’t even know if he lied based on–

HANNITY: They thought he didn’t.

TRUMP: –what the reports are. And others, look what happened to them on the other side. But these people, there were so many lies, and lies before Congress, which is just about the ultimate, sworn testimony where Comey told so much. And he leaked – he leaked classified information. Well, if somebody in our team leaked classified information, it would be years in jail. So nobody can understand what went on.

Nobody really understands one other thing. When the report came out, why didn’t they look at all of these acts on the other side? Why was it they only looked at our people? And now, all of that being said, the end result – it took a long time, almost two years, but the end result is no collusion and no obstruction. But it took a long time to get there.

HANNITY: Mr. President, you have the ability to release the FISA applications. There was the original application, three subsequent renewal applications. We are told, Andrew McCabe said, no dossier, no FISA warrant. That was a backdoor to your campaign before the election.

TRUMP: Right.

HANNITY: The dossier also was leaked to The Washington Post, parts of it, and Isikoff and David Corn, to the American people, and of course, never verified. Do you have plans to release those FISA applications, Gang of Eight information, the 302s of Bruce Ohr and others, and the five buckets that John Solomon and Sara Carter, as they call them?

TRUMP: I do. I have plans to declassify and release. I have plans to absolutely release. But I have some very talented people working for me, lawyers. And they really didn’t want me to do it early on. Devin Nunes, by the way, and Meadows, you look at Jim Jordan, and so many of the people that were – they worked so hard. And a lot of people wanted me to do it a long time ago. I’m glad I didn’t do it. We got a great result without having to do it, but we will.

One of the reasons that my lawyers didn’t want me to do it is they said, if I do it, they’ll call it a form of obstruction. So they will say, oh, you released these documents, so we would make all of this information transparent. You know, in politics, you always hear transparency – would make it transparent. And then they’d call it obstruction, knowing the people we’re dealing with.

So, frankly, I thought it would be better if we held it to the end. No, but at the right time, we will be absolutely releasing it. And I did the right thing by not doing it so far. But you understand, they would call it something that it wouldn’t be. It’s the only time you’d be transparent where they’d say bad things about transparency.

HANNITY: Mr. President, due to testimony – thanks to Georgia Republican Collins, we now have testimony. One thing that shocked me a little bit last week was the testimony of Strzok and Page, where both of them suggesting that the fix was in on Hillary, and because it was being – every decision was being run through the AG’s office. That means Loretta Lynch, who also met on the tarmac with Bill Clinton, which brings us to a higher level than maybe we once thought.

Any reaction to that with Loretta Lynch, apparently, according to Strzok and Page, running the show, making the decisions for the FBI at that time? And remember, the interaction between Comey and Loretta Lynch, when he said it’s an investigation, she said, no, it’s a matter.

TRUMP: Well, first of all, Doug Collins is fantastic, the job he is doing. He’s been incredible. I wish he were Chairman, but he’s not. But we’re not off by much. I think we’ll retake the House because they see what we’ve done and they see the confusion and everything. All they want to do is investigate, and now the investigation is turning out to be something that’s not very good.

And Nancy Pelosi is smart. She’s right in what she’s saying because, to be honest with you, especially now after this great result, because I didn’t know – you just can’t – when you see the people that we’re talking about, you just don’t know that you’re going to get a no-collusion answer, a strong no-collusion answer.

But I will say, I want to thank Doug Collins. I’ll also say that you start taking a look at what happened on the tarmac. A lot of people say a lot of bad things happened on the tarmac between Loretta Lynch and Bill Clinton. I’ve had a lot of planes for a long time. I’ve never stopped the plane on the tarmac to let somebody on the plane. And then they when and they talked about golf and their grandchildren for 40 minutes. It doesn’t work that way. What did they talk about? And then she was exonerated. She was given one of the great free passes of all time.

And I guess Bill Clinton said he was there to play golf. But I know the – I know the area very well, Arizona. It’s a little warm at that time of the year for golf. OK? And people – a lot of people – it’s a great state, I love it, but you’re not playing a lot of golf right there at that time. So you have to find out, what happened in the back of that plane that so many things took place after that incident, that meeting between the Attorney General Lynch and Bill Clinton? A lot of bad things happened right after that. You have to find out. So there’s so many different things, and it’s important for our country that those things be determined and found out.

HANNITY: Last question about people and then – if you don’t mind, I wanted to ask you about substantive issues. A couple of big things happened on immigration and health care this week. The last two, we know that Clapper lied under oath. I believe the statute of limitations, though, was passed. And in the case of Brennan, we know that there was surveillance unmasking and leaking raw intelligence, an increase of 350 percent of unmasking, Samantha Powers, who was working for the U.N., asking for 300 cases unmasked, she denies it.

TRUMP: Right.

HANNITY: But in that particular case of Brennan and Clapper – and Brennan, in particular, multiple times accused you of treason.

TRUMP: Yeah.

HANNITY: Your reaction?

TRUMP: Well, I think Brennan is a sick person. I really do. I believe there’s something wrong with him. And I watched for him to come out of the CIA and act that way. Was so disrespectful to the country and to the CIA and to the position he held. And he was not considered good at what he did. He was never a respected guy. Tough guy, but not a respected guy. But he lied to Congress.

And the other night, before the report came out, he predicted horrible things. So things he said were horrible. And then today, I guess he said something – I didn’t see it, but I heard he said, “Well, I must have had bad sources or bad information. I mean, this is a man who really is either sick or there’s some other problem. But the way he spoke — and as you know, Clapper lied, and perhaps the statute of limitations ran out on that one, but it didn’t run out on Comey, it didn’t run out on Brennan or Strzok or Page or McCabe.

I mean, McCabe, his wife got hundreds of thousands of dollars. He was running the FBI and running all sorts of cases, and his wife got hundreds of thousands of dollars from essentially Clintons, from Clintons’ closest friend. And then he ruled so favorably. I mean, he tries to say that he wasn’t involved. I don’t think too many people believe that. I don’t believe that. But she got all those good rulings. It’s really a scandalous situation.

And it’s so badly that it reflects so horribly a guy like Ohr, with his wife, Nellie Ohr, and GPS Fusion. She wrote the report and then goes, gives it to her husband who is at the DOJ, and then he goes and brings it to the FBI, and she’s getting paid for doing it. It’s incredible.

HANNITY: Yeah.

TRUMP: The things that happened are incredible and very, very bad for our country.

HANNITY: Well, I hope you’re right. I think we’ve got to get to the bottom of it, because if we don’t – and the media has been no help, the biggest abuse of power scandal. If I may move on to a couple of issues, conservatives that – when you had a 35-day shutdown, you were inviting Nancy Pelosi, Chuck Schumer to sit with you. You put DACA on the table, Dreamers on the table.

You wanted to quickly – they said they wanted – they’ve furloughed employees to be paid. After 35 days, you decided, OK, this strategy is not working. I was pretty confident. I think I’ve known you well over 20 years now that you were just changing strategies. But we now know that they couldn’t override the veto, and that means how much money now is available for the wall and what is the status, the progress, how many more miles need to be built, how many have you repaired, how many miles? Where are we with all of this?

TRUMP: We’ve repaired, I mean, literally – many, many miles. I could give you numbers, but many, many miles. We’re building many miles. We’re going to have hundreds of miles are already under construction or soon to be under construction. Billions of dollars will be necessary. It’s absolutely vital if you look at what’s happening at the border. It’s terrible with the human traffickers, the drugs, everything that’s coming across. And it goes across the soft points, which are the points without the wall. And we will have hundreds of miles built fairly quickly. Billions of dollars.

We took a billion dollars in today. And I’m building it much less expensively than it was in the past. If you look at the past, they were talking about 25 to $30 billion. I’m building it for a fraction of that. The wall is better. It’s going up faster. The Army Corps of Engineers is doing a great job working with us, and we have some real professionals. And the military has been incredible, putting up the barbwire – essentially, it’s barbwire. It’s actually barbwire-plus. But it’s incredible what they’ve done. You’ve seen it. I mean, many, many miles of wire.

And if we didn’t have it, we would really have a problem. But we are – like, we’re really capturing. Let’s use the word capturing. We’re capturing people that are coming in illegally. We’re not just releasing them. In some cases, we’re running out of room. In many cases, now we’re running out of room. The laws are so bad. Normally you just bring them back, but the laws don’t let you do that. Our laws that could be easily changed by the Democrats, but they are so bad and so corrupt on immigration, whether it’s catch-and-release or chain migration or any of the various things that we have to put up with. It’s terrible.

So – but we’re doing fantastically. We’re building – in fact, in two weeks, I’m going to a location, it’s going to be in California. Believe it or not, they were begging us to build in San Diego, begging us to build a wall. And we’re just in the process of completing a major stretch of many miles of wall. And we’re going to have a news conference there just to show people that–

HANNITY: Mr. President, do you–

TRUMP: –it’s really good stuff. It’s better, less expensive, and goes up faster. But it’s actually better than what they were doing before. So we’re going to have it done, and we’re in great shape. And I got great support from the Republicans, both in Congress. If you look at our congressmen and women and from the Senate, I really had great support. Couple of them, people voted against, but you know what? That’s OK. They had their reasons. But we had great support.

HANNITY: And you will be able to use, according to the Department of Defense, a significant number of billions of dollars because–

(CROSSTALK)

TRUMP: Many billions, yeah.

HANNITY: –your emergency declaration.

TRUMP: Many billions. And if you go to a lot of the generals, they will tell you, this is a national emergency. This is – we need to defend our country. You have people pouring in. I mean, they are – and now we’re capturing these people. We’re – we’re getting them. But we don’t do like other countries. Other countries stand there with machine guns ready to fire. We can’t do that and I wouldn’t want to do that. OK? It’s a very effective way of doing it, and I wouldn’t want to do it. We can’t do it.

But we do – if we have barriers, if we have the walls like we’re building now, and building a – a lot of people don’t think we’re building walls. We’re building massive, many, many, many miles of walls right now. And we’re gearing up to do many more. We’ll have hundreds of miles of walls built in the very near – built and renovated, too. A lot of it, we’re able to use the old carcass of a wall. We fixed it and we – for a smaller amount of money, we’re able to build a wall that’s literally just as good as new.

So we’ve done a lot of work on it, lot of talent has been involved, and we’ve had really a tremendous help. A lot of people agree. I mean, most people agree. Even the Democrats agree. They don’t say that. They go into back rooms – like I said before about Schiff, they go back there and they laugh, but they go into the room and laugh. Everyone knows you need the wall. The Democrats, almost every one of them voted for the walls in the past. But now they don’t because they don’t want to give us a victory. But they’re hurting the country. They’re not hurting me. They’re hurting the country.

HANNITY: Mr. President, you’ve heard about the New Green Deal. You see the people that would like to challenge you in 2020. Proposals of as high as a 70 percent top marginal tax rate for individuals, 90 percent for corporations, a wealth tax. The New Green Deal says, no oil, no gas at all. We’re now energy-independent for the first time in over 70 years, and we are now a net exporter of energy because of lending bureaucracy and regulations. And then it’s everything is free, everything.

And on top of that, they’re going to get rid of the combustion engine, and we’re going to also get rid of perhaps cows and airplanes, and we are going to build high-speed trains, and just Medicare for all with no other choices. What is your reaction, as you watch this New Green Deal and the comments of all these new candidates? Do you have any reaction to it?

TRUMP: Well, I don’t want to speak badly about the New Green Deal, Sean, because, frankly, I’m afraid that they’ll stop using it because I really do want to campaign against it. It’s ridiculous. All right? It’s crazy. And it will cost $100 trillion. Nobody knows what that means. That means it’s more money than you have in the world. And it will be catastrophic. It’s not going to happen. It’s just talk.

And of course, they’ll campaign on it. They’ll say we’re going to give free everything, you’re going to end up being Venezuela if that’s happening. We have a nice big problem with Venezuela. You look at Venezuela, was a wealthy country not long ago, and now it’s one of the poorest countries. We’ll end up being the same thing.

The New Green Deal is ridiculous, but I don’t want to speak badly because I want them to keep going forward with it. I really look forward to campaigning. It’s just a little bit early. Just like Elizabeth Warren. I hit her too hard too early, and now it looks like she’s finished. I wish she would have been in the race, and frankly, I would have loved to have run against her, but I would say she’s probably finished. But they have plenty left. New Green Deal is going nowhere.

HANNITY: Let me ask you, you – many presidents had promised Israel that they would move the capital from Tel Aviv to Jerusalem. You made the tough decision. You’ve got that done. I’ve known the Prime Minister of Israel personally for well over 20 years like I’ve known you for well over 20 years. I have always viewed Prime Minister Netanyahu as a Churchillian figure with moral clarity that few people had on the world stage, standing alone often. And I saw that you – I thought it was a very big announcement about the Golan Heights being Israel’s territory.

As you see the rise of anti-semitism, not just – we have members of Congress that have said horrible things. But in Europe and elsewhere, and the dangers of the small country, radical Islam, I just wanted to get your reaction to the importance of Israel as our close ally.

TRUMP: Well, you don’t have to go to other countries when you see what’s going on in this country. Yesterday, I was very honored to do the Golan Heights. That was something that was promised by many, many presidents over many, many years, and I got it done.

Then you look at also Jerusalem – moving the Embassy to Jerusalem. For years, many presidents for many decades campaigned on it. They were going to do it, then they never did it because frankly, it was much tougher to do than people would ever understand. It was very tough. I understand why they ultimately didn’t do it. They didn’t get it done, but I got it done. Not only did I get it done, I got the embassy built for a fraction – a tiny, tiny fraction of the cost of what it was supposed to cost. And now, as you know, the Embassy is open. It’s not just designated, it’s open in Jerusalem.

So, look, I’m very proud of what we’ve done for Israel. I’m very proud of my relationship with Israel. And what’s going on with the Democrats and with Jewish people and the Democrats and Israel is shocking to me. I grew up in a world where people really – and Democrats, they loved Israel. And now I’m looking at a world where many Democrats seem to hate Israel. They seem to despise Israel. And it’s a tremendous surprise to me–

(CROSSTALK)

HANNITY: You know–

TRUMP: –what’s going on with Israel and the Democrat Party is absolutely horrific. Terrible.

HANNITY: I meant to ask you earlier. Devin Nunes, who’s been on this show many times, and I think has been – when he was the Chairman of the House Intel Committee, he wrote and warned everybody, we have watched Russia over the years, a hostile regime, hostile actor on the world stage.

We know that Barack Obama caught on that microphone saying I’ll have a lot more flexibility in my next term, and then the case of Schiff being caught on tape thinking – colluding, trying to get information about you to impact our electoral system. But more importantly, we have known that they have impacted other nations’ elections. Nunes warned this country about how hostile they are on our elections.

We need free, fair elections. We do know that they tried, attempted to influence, seemingly on both sides. How do we prevent them? We have 250,000 IT people working for our government. How do we not have the ability to stop this type of hostility coming from foreign powers, hostile regimes like Russia?

TRUMP: Well, first of all, let me say that Devin Nunes is someday going to be hailed as a great American hero. They tried to destroy that man because he spoke up for good and just and all of the things that you have to speak up for. But most people don’t have the courage to do it. He will be someday hailed as a great American hero, what he did. They tried to ruin him. They tried to destroy him. They tried to ruin his life and his family. And he just kept plugging like there was nothing going on. I mean, it was an amazing thing.

As far as your other part of the question, in September, if you look, supposedly, the FBI told President Obama all about Russia trying to get involved in some form in the election. And he decided to do nothing about it because he thought Hillary Clinton was going to win. So he didn’t want to do anything because he thought that Clinton was going to win and he didn’t want to upset the applecart. But he knew about it.

And the question is – one of the many, many questions, and this is probably not as big as other questions because you’re talking about major, major treason and corrupt and all of the things. But one of the questions, why didn’t he do something? He knew about it. This wasn’t up to me. I wasn’t President when all of this was happening. Why didn’t President Obama and the Obama administration do something when they were informed about Russia and the election?

HANNITY: Mr. President, I only have about another minute-and-a-half. Thank you for being so generous with your time. Will you make it a priority before the 2020 elections to make sure we have election integrity and beef up our defenses as a country, so no foreign entity can have any impact? And how important is that and the steps that you’re thinking about taking? A little over a minute.

TRUMP: Well, I think it’s very important to know that Russia or anybody else had no impact on votes. And that’s very important for people to know. And that’s been coming out, as you know, from every agency and everybody that’s done it. So whether they tried, and how hard they tried, and President Obama knew, the bottom line is, they had zero impact on the election of 2016. And I’m very happy about that.

That is – that’s what we’re all about. We can’t allow that to happen in any way, shape, or form. But we are putting very strong safeguards in. We’re having many – this sounds a little old-fashioned, but the best backup is a paper backup, not a computer backup. And we have many paper backups, just in case there is a problem, something which they didn’t have before. But we are being very vigilant and working very hard.

HANNITY: Sir–

TRUMP: And we have tremendous systems in place, Sean.

HANNITY: 10-second answer. Will you get – now that the Justice Department, on Obamacare, joining with the court decision, will we get that done? It’s – we only have 10 seconds.

TRUMP: We’re going to do great. We’re going along with Texas. We’re winning the case. And we’re going to have great health care. The Republican Party will be the party of great health care. You watch.

HANNITY: And pre-existing conditions and choices.

TRUMP: All included. We’re going to have pre-existing conditions, absolutely and we already got rid of the individual mandate which was costing people a fortune, was terrible.

HANNITY: Mr. President, thank you so much for your time tonight. We appreciate you staying so long and answering so many questions. We appreciate it.

TRUMP: Thank you very much, Sean.

Here’s the video:

Please Mr. President, please close the U.S-Mexico border.  It will be painful, but economic pressure is the only pressure likely to create change.  Force Mexico to take action.

EL PASO, TX — On Wednesday morning, U.S. Customs and Border Protection Commissioner Kevin K. McAleenan hosted a press conference in El Paso, Texas to discuss the impact of the dramatic increase in illegal crossings that continue to occur along the Southwest border.

(Tweet Link)

“CBP is facing an unprecedented humanitarian and border security crisis all along our Southwest Border,” said McAleenan. “And nowhere has that crisis manifested more acutely than here in El Paso Sector. Here in El Paso, we have almost 3,500 migrants in custody this morning, in facilities designed for many fewer. We had over 1,000 apprehensions on Monday. The vast majority are families from Central America.”

Nationwide, CBP had more than 12,000 migrants in custody this week. The agency considers 4,000 to be a high number of migrants in custody and 6,000 to be at a crisis level. More than 12,000 migrants in custody is unprecedented.  (read more)

.

Rush Limbaugh appears on Fox News Special Report to discuss the fraud behind the Special Counsel and the “manufactured Coup d’état” against President Trump.

Tonight President Donald J. Trump is holding a MAGA rally at the Van Andel Arena in Grand Rapids, Michigan.  The anticipated start time for President Trump is 7:00pm with pre-rally events earlier.

UPDATE: Video Added

RSBN Livestream Link – GST Livestream Link – Alternate Livestream Link

.

Earlier today, prior to departing for Michigan, President Trump delivered impromptu remarks to the media from the South lawn of the White House. [Video and Transcript]

.

[Transcript] South Lawn – 4:17 P.M. EDT – THE PRESIDENT: So we’re going to Michigan. We’re opening up car plants in Michigan again for the first time in decades. They’re coming in — really pouring in. Car companies are coming in. Toyota just announced $13.5 billion coming into our country. And Michigan is booming and Ohio is booming, and North Carolina, South Carolina, Florida — a lot of places.

But we have a lot of car companies and we have a lot of companies coming back into our country. And this has been happening pretty much since I’ve been President. It’s really amazing what’s going on. But, again, because I’m going to Michigan, I will tell you, we’ll be speaking about it tonight.

We have companies coming back in — car companies. It’s a great thing to see.

Q Mr. President, this is the first time you’ve had an opportunity to speak on a scale like this since the Mueller report. Will this be a bit of a victory lap for you?

THE PRESIDENT: Well, look, I’ve been going through that for almost two years. But it’s really much more than that because, if you look back, you can probably look at the insurance policy area in terms of timing. It’s a disgrace what happened.

This was a terrible thing that was put onto our country. Nobody has seen anything like this. Probably never happened before. A beautiful conclusion. I haven’t seen the report. Beautiful conclusion.

And there was no collusion at all. There never was. Everybody knew it. I wish it could have gone in one week instead of taking almost two years. But the result was great: no obstruction, no collusion, no anything. It was a great — yeah, it was a great thing. But it took a long time.

Q Is this having an effect on the current round of trade talks with China? Our understanding is that the Chinese were waiting for this report to come out before they started making some moves forward.

THE PRESIDENT: Well, I can’t tell you whether or not it had an impact on other countries, including China. I can say this: that countries are reacting very well. We’re doing very well with our trade talks with China, and our trade talks and other talks with other countries. Our country is doing great.

If you look at — if you look at other countries, if you look at what’s happening, the economies of other countries — we’re leading the world economically. We’re leading the world as far as our economy is concerned. We have a strong dollar. We have — I mean, things are going very well.

And one of the reasons I’m going out tonight to Michigan is we’ve brought back so much industry, so many car companies to Michigan. So we’re very happy.

Q But the Barr memo does say Russia interfered. What will we do in 2020 to make sure that we do not have —

Q Why cut funding for the Special Olympics? Why do that?

Q What will you do in 2020 to make sure there is no repeat?

THE PRESIDENT: Quiet.

Q Why cut Special Olympics funding? Why cut money for the Special Olympics? Why would you cut funding for that?

THE PRESIDENT: The Special Olympics will be funded. I just told my people, “I want to fund the Special Olympics.” And I just authorized a funding of the Special Olympics. I’ve been to the Special Olympics. I think it’s incredible. And I just authorized a funding. I heard about it this morning. I have overridden my people. We’re funding the Special Olympics.

Q What you think about Facebook banning white nationalism?

THE PRESIDENT: Say it?

Q What do you think about Facebook banning white nationalism?

THE PRESIDENT: I don’t know.

Q (Inaudible) Theresa May saying that she’ll resign if her Brexit deal comes through.

THE PRESIDENT: Well, she’s a very nice lady. She’s a friend of mine. I hope she does well. I hope the Brexit movement and everything happening there goes very well. But Theresa May is a very good woman. And I’ll tell you what: She’s strong, she’s tough. And she’s in there fighting.

Q What do you think of Boris Johnson as Prime Minister?

THE PRESIDENT: I like Boris Johnson a lot. He’s a friend of mine.

Q Mr. President, the Governor of Puerto Rico said he won’t be bullied by your White House. What’s your response to that?

THE PRESIDENT: I’ve taken better care of Puerto Rico than any man ever. We have $91 billion going to Puerto Rico. We have $29 billion to Texas and $12 billion to Florida for the hurricanes. Puerto Rico has been taken care of better by Donald Trump than by any living human being. And I think the people of Puerto Rico understand it.

But you do have a mayor of San Juan that, frankly, doesn’t know what she’s doing. And the Governor — they got to spend the money wisely. They don’t know how to spend the money, and they’re not spending it wisely.

But I’m giving them more money than they’ve ever got — gotten. And frankly, the people of Puerto Rico, I really have a great relationship with them. And I think, when it comes time, they really do appreciate it.

Q Mozambique needs (inaudible). They aren’t in the best situation. They have a flood, and many kids are dying. Mozambique.

THE PRESIDENT: Where? Where?

Q Mozambique. Mozambique.

THE PRESIDENT: We’re going to look into that very much.

Q Which healthcare plan do you support? Graham-Cassidy, (inaudible) —

THE PRESIDENT: So, Obamacare has been an absolute disaster. I have asked John Barrasso, senator; Bill Cassidy, who’s a terrific healthcare person; Rick Scott and others to take a look, form a really great plan. We’re winning the lawsuit to terminate Obamacare in Texas. We are winning the Texas lawsuit. And right now, we’re on the winning side. Hopefully, we’ll win at the appellate division and go to the Supreme Court to terminate Obamacare.

The cost of Obamacare to people is far too much. The deductibility is ridiculous. It averages more than $7,000, meaning it’s unusable. So, Obamacare has been disaster. We will take care of preexisting conditions better than they’re taken care of now. And I’ve already gotten rid of the individual mandate, which was the worst part of Obamacare, where you had to pay for the privilege of not getting bad insurance.

So — wait a minute. So we are working very hard on that. John Barrasso, Rick Scott, we have some great people. You look — I mean, we’ve put together a group of four or five, and Bill Cassidy is a terrific healthcare person. And they are going to work together and come up with something that’s really spectacular. Maybe we’ll even get support in the House from Democrats. But it’s going to be far better than Obamacare.

If we win on Obamacare, it will be terminated in the court. And we’ll see what happens.

Q What’s the timeline? When will you have a plan?

THE PRESIDENT: Well, we’re working on a plan now. There’s no very great rush from the standpoint. We’re waiting for decisions in the court. But we’ve already won the case against — for the termination of Obamacare — against Obamacare. Now we’ll go to the appellate division. We’ll see what happens there. I think we’ll win; it’s in Texas.

Q Are you —

THE PRESIDENT: Wait. Wait. And then it goes to the Supreme Court of the United States.

If the decisions are held up, if we win on the termination of Obamacare, we will have a plan that’s far better than Obamacare, including, very importantly, preexisting conditions, which I’ve always been in favor of.

Q Mr. President, what did the FBI tell you about Jussie Smollett?

THE PRESIDENT: Well, I think the Smollett — I think the case in Chicago is an absolute embarrassment to our country. And I have asked that it be — that they look at it.

I think that case is an absolute embarrassment to our country, and somebody has to at least take a very good, hard look at it.

END 4:25 P.M. EDT

Tonight President Trump called-in to Fox News host Sean Hannity for an unusually lengthy interview.  The interview ran almost 45 minutes without commercial interruption.

There are multiple breaking news aspects to this interview including President Trump affirming his intention to declassify all of the material previously discussed [See Here]. As CTH noted last year, President Trump stated his lawyers directly advised him against declassification because such action would be construed as obstruction.  WATCH:

.

I’ll be breaking down this interview for continued discussion.