Unless Obama is removed from office, and I mean now, he will have destroyed the entire infrastructure of the Country


Beyond Belief’: Obama Moves to Close Last US Uranium Plant

Image: 'Beyond Belief': Obama Moves to Close Last US Uranium Plant The American Centrifuge Plant in Piketon, Ohio. (AP)

By David A. Patten   |   Monday, 28 Sep 2015 09:50 PM

The Obama administration plans to close the last remaining American-owned uranium enrichment facility in the United States, even as it moves forward on a controversial nuclear deal with Iran that permits the Islamic Republic to conduct ongoing and significant uranium enrichment.

The U.S. Department of Energy (DOE) has informed Centrus Energy it will end the American Centrifuge project in Piketon, Ohio, on Sept. 30. Notices have been issued to some 235 workers that their jobs are in jeopardy.

“We have concluded that continued support from the federal government for additional data from Piketon operations has limited remaining value,” a joint DOE/National Nuclear Security Administration statement said, reports the Chillicothe Gazette.

“This is beyond belief,” Rep. Brad Wenstrup, R-Ohio, responded in a statement. “While this administration is greenlighting uranium enrichment in Iran and legitimizing 6,000 Iranian centrifuges, they’re shutting down domestic production here in America.”

Wenstrup called the closure decision “a dangerous threat to our national security.”

In its announcement that it will shutter American Centrifuge, the DOE announced the enrichment technologies developed at Piketon may be transferred to the Oak Ridge National Laboratory in Oak Ridge, Tennessee.

As recently as 20 years ago, the United States produced nearly 50 percent of the global supply of enriched uranium. Today, however, U.S. production accounts for only about 10 percent of the global supply, with Russia, France, the United Kingdom, Germany, and Holland producing the bulk of the world’s enriched uranium.

One Centrus Energy fact sheet warns: “The United States is at risk of losing its only future capability to enrich uranium to meet key national security needs.”

Urenco USA, owned by a consortium of European firms, operates another uranium-enrichment facility in New Mexico.

Noting that Congress has provided full funding for the project, Wenstrup called the DOE’s decision, which was announced on Sept 11, “a shameful and unilateral move.” Centrus Vice President Steve Penrod reacted to the DOE announcement, saying “obviously we are disappointed.”

Sen. Rob Portman, R-Ohio, said he was “stunned” by the administration’s announcement. He met with workers at the plant this weekend to discuss their options.

Sen. Sherrod Brown, D-Ohio, said the plant is “important to keeping our nation safe and secure for generations to come.” He expressed hope the administration could be persuaded to reverse course on a decision that he termed “shortsighted.”

Without the American Centrifuge Plant, the United States will have to rely on existing supplies of tritium, a radioactive material that about 12.5 years before it decays to the point where it is no longer effective.

Tritium can be used to boost or modulate the yield of a nuclear warhead. Tritium can also be produced by nuclear reactors.

A Centrus Energy fact sheet warns that cuts in U.S. enrichment capability are “potentially causing” U.S. nuclear plants to become dependent on foreign fuel sources. U.S. enriched uranium also plays an important role in powering U.S. Navy submarines and aircraft carriers.

The Democratic-Aristocratic-Synthesis of American Exceptionalism


The Democratic-Aristocratic-Synthesis of American Exceptionalism

Post by Prof. Paul Eidelberg

It hardly seems exceptional to say, as stated in my bookBeyond Detente: Toward an American Foreign Policy, that “the American republic is ultimately based on the principle that all men are created equal.” Nevertheless, and “contrary to universally accepted opinion, this principle, far from being wholly democratic, is the precondition for any genuine aristocracy”!

“So shocking or paradoxical an assertion requires supportive argument, for which purpose I must refer to my work On the Silence of the Declaration of Independence[the most obvious source of American Exceptionalism].”

“Viewed within the proper political context, the statement of the Declaration that all men are created equal was intended to inform mankind in general, and the British government in particular, that Americans belong to the same species as Englishmen, hence that they are endowed by nature with certain unalienable rights peculiar to that species.

These rights constitute an unalienable possession, because man is a created being who did not create himself. More precisely, inasmuch as man did not create his own nature, he did not create the rights he possesses in virtue of his nature. In consequence of this, he cannot be justly divested of those rights so long as he does not violate his nature or the distinction between man and beasts. In short, only because man is homo rationalis et civilis does he possess (or can he reasonably claim) the unalienable rights to life, liberty, and the pursuit of happiness.

“Notice, however, that while the statesmen of the Declaration claimed that the Americans possess these rights as species, they were being prevented from exercising these rights as individuals.  This implicit distinction between the possession and exercise of rights is of profound significance. For nothing in the Declaration suggests that all men as individuals are entitled to the actual exercise of their rights without qualification.

In proof of this it is sufficient to point out that that preamble of the Declaration or its equivalent was incorporated into most of the state constitutions, many of which prescribed property and other qualifications for voting and for office. An implicit distinction was therefore made between men’s rights and their privileges. Whereas the rights men possess as species are defined by nature, the privileges they exercise as individuals are defined by law, whether written or customary.

“Accordingly, the equality spoken of in the Declaration does not extend to privileges. Nevertheless, and strange as it may seem, the notion of privilege is a logical consequence of the Declaration’s principle of equality. For the principle that all men are created equal should be understood as a moral prohibition against any and all privileges based on race, nationality, class, or parentage.

The only moral title to any privilege which society may confer must be based on individual merit. In other words, what the equality of the Declaration requires is that no person be precluded by law from earning any established privilege on the basis of factors extrinsic to human nature or to those intellectual and moral qualities that distinguish the human from the subhuman.

Examined in this light, the principle that all men are created equal – which does not mean they are born equal in their intellectual, moral and physical endowments – may be regarded as the precondition of any aristocracy. As Jefferson wrote to John Adams: ’I agree with you that there is a natural aristocracy among men. The grounds of this are virtue and talents….The natural aristocracy I consider the most precious gift of nature for the instruction, trusts, and government of society.’

“It thus appears that the American polity had its origin in a synthesis of democratic and aristocratic principles….

[T]his democratic-aristocratic synthesis underlies The Federalist Papers and is most clearly evident in its recurring theme of deference to merit. In Federalist 36, Hamilton [who was born out of wedlock] declares: ‘There are strong minds in every walk of life that will rise superior to the disadvantages of situation, and will recommend the tribute to their merit, not only from the classes to which they particularly belong, but from society in general. The door ought to be equally open to all.’”

Therein is the democratic-aristocratic synthesis of American Exceptionalism!

Epilog: Of course, America has degenerated into a normless democracy. Its vaunted equality and freedom are devoid of any rational and ethical constraints. This is why Barack Obama, whose Muslim faith rejects the principle that all men are created equal, was twice elected President of the United States.  The full reckoning of this travesty is yet to come.◙

On being Free verses being Controlled


Democracy Is More Than A Right to Vote

Thatcher-Socialism

The first thing government and the majority of academics try to hide is the business cycle for they argue only their policies will eliminate something that is part of nature. We must understand that the origin of all business cycles is humanity. I named one report which has become pretty famous “It’s Just Time” in honor of my friend Margaret Thatcher. When we were talking about politics, she said John Major would lose long before we knew for sure even whom his opponent would be. When I asked her why, Margaret, who instinctively understood cycles, said, “It’s just time.”

Margaret and I became friends. I visited her office in London frequently and she even invited me to her home for her annual Christmas party. She instinctively knew that public attitudes change, and with them, the political winds from among the people. She addressed our conference and stated publicly that politics looks at things in terms of trends, but perhaps they should look at the world in terms of cycles.

thatcher-conference

 Somehow, someway, robbing other people has become the justified political agenda. There can be no equal justice or freedom of thought, religion, or anything as long as we discriminate against others for race, creed, sexual orientation, beliefs, or possessions. One of the Ten Commandments even states that you should not covet thy neighbor’s possessions and clearly condemns this agenda. Yet, forcibly taking what others earn is seen as fair. This is very strange; when an individual does that on their own, it becomes a crime. We let politicians discriminate and rob others of what they have, and somehow it is a badge of honor.

Athena

The democratic rise in Athens during the ancient world was rather distinct and far more important than people assume by just looking at the surface. Their so-called gods were not the same vision we have today as a single God who created the world. Their gods were not creators, but perhaps closer to superheroes or evil manipulators; extensions of human nature. These ancient Gods were depicted in human form, opposed to some wild looking creature. This reflects a concept that began in Greece: the idea that the individual mattered. Prior to Athens, governments were autocratic political systems who held the belief that humankind required a stiff hand to rule them or chaos would emerge. So the concept of democracy was truly revolutionary that the individual could provide for self-rule and that such freedom would not lead to chaos.

Socialism has devolved back into this assumption of the autocratic rule; that the individual is incapable of caring for their self and requires a strong autocratic ruler. We are heading into a political storm; this degradation of the individual has once again resurfaced as it always does.

While the resurrection of authoritative government whereby the real underlying principle is that we are incapable of self-rule, also emerged during the period of the Age of Enlightenment. This hybrid theory became a way to blend authoritative rule with somehow individual rights. This became known as the social contract. In moral and political philosophy, this concept of a social contract (political contract) addressed attempted to established the origin of society with social rights merged with the legitimacy of the authority of the state over the individual.

leviathan

Leviathan was a book written by Thomas Hobbes (1588–1679) and originally published in 1651 during the English Civil War (1642–1651). The Leviathan argues for a social contract expressing that the people need the king with an absolute sovereign rule. Hobbes explained that civil war could only be avoided by strong undivided government. Of course, this same theory has been behind the idea of a one world government that was used to force upon the European people Brussels, which once again is proving to be the destruction of any democratic process since not one member of the Trioka stands for any election whatsoever. The Social Contract (Du contrat social ou Principes du droit politique) is also the short title of a 1762 book by Jean-Jacques Rousseau on this topic.

The problem with the social contract concept has been that it is never capable of restraining the desire for more and more power. Hence, the very idea of socialism become corrupted and unattainable. There appears to be no possible way society’s rights can be maintained with any position of an authoritative rule.

invisible-hand

A true concept of democracy is when people are competent of self-rule. Humankind is not helpless and does not need to devolve into chaos that requires a dictatorial style government for their own good. True democracy is without career politicians and is based on human cooperation. A Republic, which contains career politicians, always devolves into an oligarchy and ultimately dictatorial authoritarian rule while pretending to support the moral philosophy of the social contract. The former emerges from the cooperation of humankind (Invisible Hand) while the latter is based upon punishment. The first inspires freedom while the second suppresses human nature.

It appears that only a Direct Democracy will stand any chance of breaking this cycle between society and authoritative rule. What self-corrupts is always a Republic where we elected pretend representatives. They only become career politicians. In the USA, we recognized the danger with FDR and then made it that no one could be president for more than two terms. The same should have applied to Congress.

We need annual citizen panels to oversee the bureaucrats and that nothing can be enacted without first testing to see if it is constitutional. We should adopt Ben Franklin’s proposal for judges, that they ONLY be nominated by the legal profession and never by politicians. The terms should never be for life and the minimum age should be 50 with the maximum 65 so that they have life experience. No single judge should ever rule in any case, but there should be rotating panels of three judges with one being appointed for just one case and return to private practice. Anyone with any connection to the case MUST recuse himself or suffer life imprisonment.

The citizen panels must be with people who are qualified in each field. In finance, only someone with experience would sit on a panel for one year and never again serve. This would be akin to serving in the army for your country.

No legislation should ever be allowed to be merged. Each must be voted upon by the people directly and each must stand alone. The entire Social Security Act was 16 pages. Obamacare stood 7 feet tall 33000 pages and we still do not know everything lurking in there. This is the essence of corruption. Nobody can argue this was good legislation unless they read the entire thing, which nobody has.

So what political system might work at least for a while until its crumbles into corruption? It appears the last thing we can try is Direct Democracy and trust the people for once. It’s an old idea that may need to be reexamined.

Latest North Carolina Poll Shows Rand Paul at ZERO – Donald Trump Expanding Lead With 26%…


The RNC and Rove’s plan will not work if we can keep the voters aware of what they are doing, then it will back fire on them!

Defeating The Professional Political Machine – Ditch and Switch…


The people are not happy with what the politicians have done after we gave them both houses. They whine and whine that they can’t make a change; but we know they are nothing but accomplished liars. They can try and try but it will not work they have gone to foo far with what they have done and so even a fool can see the end — and it’s not good.

Understanding Karl Rove’s “Operation Hummingbird”…


I’m posting this again so my follower will not forget the Rove strategy. With knowledge comes understanding And the winner must out think his/her opponent. Sun Tzu’s The Art of War.

Latest National Polling – Donald Trump 30% – With Updates On GOP Race…


I think Trump is a lot smarter than Karl Rove and Rove’s operation Hummingbird will fail just like the last to presidential elections the Rove had a hand in. Almost everyone I know is for Trump from the lowest level to well ito the middle class. The RNC has no idea what they are doing they have the tiger by the tail — and that will not turn out well for them.

Fox News President Roger Ailes Navigates Murdoch’s Little Princess….


Definitely a win for Trump! Winning an election is war and in war there are no rules you have to do what is required to win. We want a winner in the White House not a pantywaist. Everyone in the world can she that Trump doesn’t take any S*** which is what we need not someone like BHO who drams line in the sand and then forgets where he draw them. We are where we are now (getting closer an closer to a major war) because BHO is a pantywaist and all the world leaders know that. Being a former Green Beret I know what leadership and having what the RNC wants to cut off … means. Some times by being tough (strong) you can avoid conflict. Trump is playing the game right — just my opinion!

Candidate Donald Trump Releases Tax Reform Plan.. (W/ Video)…


Trump’s Tax plan will work!

Donald Trump 60 Minutes Interview (video)…