Feminism on steroids!


Ten Ways Men Oppress Women with Their Everyday Behavior

By Katherine Timpf January 19, 2015 11:58 AM NATIONAL REVIEW ONLINE

By now, you may have heard of “manspreading” — when a guy sits with his legs apart on the subway to assert his dominance — and “manslamming” — when a man doesn’t get out of the way of a woman on the street and they run into each other.

While these are definitely very important women’s issues, there are still so many more we need to be talking about. Here are ten words for even more ways men are constantly oppressing women:

1. Broplimenting

This is when a guy says something nice to you without asking for your consent first. Men should always ask “Do you consent to me complimenting you?” before saying anything nice or else it’s assault. No, nonverbal cues don’t count — he still has to ask for explicit consent before offering that kind of affection.

2. Mansulting

This is when a man says something really mean to you. You know, like, the opposite of a broplimenting. Mansults are worse than insults because each one is another brick being added to the fortress of the patriarchy that surrounds you every day no matter how hard you try to fight it with hashtags on Feminist Twitter.

3. Bropen-mouth chewing

When people see man chewing with his mouth open, most think that it’s just him being rude — but that’s just because most people aren’t educated on women’s issues. Social-justice scholars realize that feeling the need to display the crushing and grinding of food is actually a sign of dominance over the lesser being that you are consuming. Especially if it’s meat because eating meat is sexist because women need to show solidarity with animals because that’s how the world sees us anyway (like animals) and we have to be their friends. (I am only interested in dating vegan men who make sure they have chewed and swallowed all of their food before we return to talking about how many microaggressions there are in the restaurant. It’s so rowomantic!)

4. Mentoring

You’ve heard this word before, but unless you’re as educated and culturally aware as I am, you have probably never thought about how sexist it is. Why isn’t it “women-toring,” huh? I’ll tell you why. It’s because we live in a society where people think men are the only ones who can give advice. Seriously, I hate when like my boss or my dad tries to help me out or give me feedback and acts like it’s because he has more experience when really we all know it’s just because he thinks that he is better than me because he is a man and I am a woman. I fight against this by refusing to take advice or direction from men and smearing anyone who tries to offer it in a Jezebel post. I just did this with my boss, actually, and guess what? He fired me! Just more proof of sexism in the workplace.

5. Sleep Manpnea

Men snore because they have to keep imposing their existence on us even while they are asleep. It is of course different from women’s snoring. When a woman snores, it’s because she has been manterrupted all day and needs some way for her voice to be heard. By the way, if a man ever tells you that your snoring bothers him, what he really means is that he is uncomfortable with the idea of women being heard.

6. Mantroduction

If a man introduces you instead of letting you introduce yourself, that’s because he wants to control your identity. If you are out with a guy and he says “This is my girlfriend . . .,” leave immediately. Sure, he might have just been trying to be respectful, but don’t feel bad for him. That would mean he doesn’t understand his privilege and you don’t want to be with someone that dumb and out of touch anyway.

7. Manspiration

This is when a man tries to inspire you with a story from his own life as if he has any idea what your life is like as a woman. Now, while that’s unacceptable, it’s also past time to recognize that men and women are equal and exactly the same. Sometimes guys say this makes no sense and is contradictory and ask me to explain, but that’s an example of . . .

8. Manterrogating

This is when a man asks you to explain anything or questions anything you say. This is included but not limited to being asked to explain contradicting lines of thought or provide any actual facts or evidence to support your claims. A real man knows the only acceptable thing to do is to blindly accept anything that comes out of a woman’s mouth rather than to continue gender disparities by manterrogating her.

9. Manpacking

Similar to manspreading, (where men sit with their legs apart on the subway and take up too much room,) this is when men bring large backpacks onto the subway that take up too much room. Before you dare manterrogate me and ask why it’s a gender issue when women can have large bags too, check your privilege and realize that the only reason women have backpacks is for makeup and other items they need to measure up to the standards imposed on her by the patriarchy. If you see a woman with a large backpack taking up space, the only person you should be mad it is yourself for imposing that backpack on her with your unrealistic standards of beauty.

10. Mensoring

This is when men censor their cool partybro bro-time stories around women because they don’t think we can handle anything offensive.

Seriously? Treat us the same! It’s not like we’re easily offended or anything!

— Katherine Timpf is a reporter at National Review Online.

MONTAGE: 112 UNKEPT PROMISES FROM EARLIER OBAMA SOTU ADDRESSES


Only 112 I would have sworn it was more than that!

Switzerland De-pegs From EU And Joins China With An Offshore Yuan Trading Center


Get economic collapse news throughout the day visit http://x22report.com More news visit http://thepeoplesnewz.com Report date: 1.21.2015 Mortgage apps rise as sub-prime buyers are allowed…

Firewall with Bill Whittle: ‘Number One With a Bullet’


A Report from Bill Whittle’s latest Firewall video entitled “Number One With a Bullet.”

It just happens to be about gun control and he throws out some interesting facts. It is brilliantly done and one of his best. From what we hear in the media today you would never guess what Bill shows us.

Racial Indoctrination and How to Fight It


All I can say is I’m glad I worked for my self since the late 1980’s. I would not be able to put up with this crap!

Supreme Court Malfeasance


And it should be no surprise that as this transformation in society occurred the country has stopped growing economically and is now in decline by any messure.

PA Pundits - International's avatarPA Pundits International

caruba_alan20080111By Alan Caruba ~

Over the course of its history the Supreme Court has made some very bad decisions and the decision to declare abortion legal ranks high among them. On January 22, 1973, in Roe v. Wade the Court interpreted the due process clause of the 14th Amendment to extend a right of privacy to a woman’s decision to have an abortion prior to the third trimester of pregnancy.

AA - Gay ProtesterThere have been 57.5 million abortions since 1973—42 years—when the decision became the law of the land. In all the wars America has fought, going back to the Revolution, the total of those killed in combat as of September 2014 was 1,343,812.

The casualties of the Supreme Court’s decision about unborn Americans reveal the wide gap between the morality, as opposed to the legality, of the Court’s decision.

Now the Court has taken on cases that will determine the…

View original post 775 more words

Who is Loretta Lynch?


They have started investigating Loretta Lynch,for Attorney-General, and immediately they could see an interesting and unnerving connection. It appears that when Loretta Lynch started Harvard, she co-founded an African-American only sorority. There was only one other girl in this sorority, Sharon Malone. The name rings a bell…

The name of the wife of the current, corrupt AG, Eric Holder, is Sharon Malone; and she is the sister of a known civil rights activist leader Vivian Malone –Jones (one of 2 black students who enrolled in the all white University of Alabama).

They checked the age: both were born in 1959 and both went to Harvard at the same time. There were very few African-American students in Harvard in 1977-1981, so it is rather certain that Loretta Lynch is an old college friend of Sharon Malone, the wife of the current AG, Eric Holder!!

Why is this connection important? Holder will inevitably be investigated by Congress for totally lawless gun-trafficking to Mexican drug cartels in Fast and Furious, the IRS scandal, the VA scandal, the DOJ, NSA, EPA, FEC and other scandals. Most importantly, AG Holder covered up use of a stolen CT Social Security number (Harrison J. Bounel 042-68-4425) and use of several different bogus IDs.

It seems that a long time college friend of Holder’s wife was picked up as a gate-keeper by Obama to continue all of the cover up actions by Holder and, MOST IMPORTANTLY, to shield Holder and Obama from criminal prosecution.

Remember — Loretta Lynch, Obama’s pick for Attorney General

Not coming to a theater near you. Hillary, the Movie.


A good summary of the the various misdeeds of the woman who wants to be the first American female president. After the disaster of the first American Black president I’m not sure I want another first, especially this one!

The Beginning and End of Secularism: From Socrates to Machiavelli


Prof. Paul Eidelberg

[Extracted from Chapter 1 of my book Beyond the Secular Mind (Greenwood Press, 1989)]

Mankind is tottering on an abyss.  Violence punctuates daily existence in a world increasingly portrayed as meaningless.  We are strangers, not only to each other but to ourselves. The “crisis of identity” has become a cliché.  Familial and national ties have been eroded: we are homeless cosmopolitans. [Recall Barack Obama boasting in 2008 that he was a cosmopolitan!]

Not knowing who or what we are, we lack the hauteur and confidence of cosmopolitans of the past. They believed in Universal Man, in man sub specie aeternitatis; we believe in nothing.  Our humanism is hollow; we cannot even take our own humanity seriously.  Nihilism and relativism have rendered the distinction between man and beast problematic in theory and hardly discernible in practice.  What indeed is noble about man that anyone should boast of being a “humanist”?

When man becomes problematic, it is a sign of civilizational decay, but also of the possibility of renewal.  Such was the case some twenty-four hundred years ago when Greek sophists like Protagoras exulted in teaching youth that “man is the measure of all things.”  This unheard of and skeptical doctrine – the dogma of today’s universities – signifies that all ideas concerning the True, the Good, and the Beautiful are human creations, hence relative to time and place. Socrates saw that this secularism cum relativism, which was then spreading throughout the Mediterranean world, would eventually destroy the Olympian gods and was even then undermining public morality in Athens, the “open society” of the Hellenic Age. Various sophists, the Greek counterparts of todays “value-free” social scientists, were broadcasting the death of Zeus, the pagan god of justice. Without Zeus, what would hold society together?  Without the traditional understanding of right and wrong, men would devour each other like animals.

Socrates’ task, completed by Plato and Aristotle, was to substitute a restrained skepticism for the sophists’ unrestrained skepticism, lest men revert to beasts.  Their world-historical function was to construct a philosophy of man and the universe that would replace the no longer credible mythology of the Homeric world. Accordingly, and as dramatized in The Republic (when the god-fearing Cephalus leaves the dialogue), philosophy replaces religion – the philosopher – replaces Zeus. No longer are the gods to rule mankind, but reason, unaided human reason, would henceforth determine how man should live.

Of course, neither Plato nor Aristotle was so naive as to expect the generality of mankind to defer to the rule of philosophers. Apart from other considerations, philosophers are not only as quarrelsome as the offspring of Zeus and Hera, but, unlike the Olympians, they are mortal: here today, gone tomorrow. Something impersonal as well as immutable and eternal was therefore needed to command the obedience of man.  What else could this be but Nature – nature divested of Homeric Deities. Neither the gods nor man but all-encompassing Nature was to be the measure of all things.  And this Nature, far from being arbitrary and mysterious, was fully accessible to the human mind.

The magnitude of Aristotle’s program has not been surpassed in the history of philosophy. He merely set out to comprehend the totality of existence, to reduce heaven and earth and all between to an organized system of theoretical, practical, and productive sciences. To borrow the terminology of Rabbi J.B. Soloveitchik [Halakhic Man, 1983]: “Aristotle would tolerate no randomness or particularity, no mystery to obscure the fleeting events of existence.  Everything had to be fixed, clear, necessary, ordered.” Nothing was beyond the grasp of the human mind because Nature or the Cosmos was an intelligent and therefore intelligible whole.

With Greek philosophy a new type of man appeared in the forefront of world history, Cognitive Man.  Cognitive Man is a secularist who deifies the intellect.  He is therefore to be distinguished from his secular rivals, Volitional Man and Sensual Man.  Whereas Cognitive Man seeks to understand the world, Volitional Man wishes to change or conquer the world, while Sensual Man wants to enjoy it.  It is only with the ascendancy of Volitional Man, portrayed by Machiavelli in The Prince, that secularism comes into its own as the regnant force of history. [This is where we are today, even in Israel, waiting for her spiritual redemption, while Secular Man is at the helm.]

 (To be continued)

I AM THE TRUTH


I am one of the 3% are you with me?