Liberated Women And The Traditional Family


Sadly this was all planned as the way to replay the republic was a power central Federal government. And that is what we now have as there is almost nothing in the citizens life’s that the feds don’t have a say in now!

PA Pundits - International's avatarPA Pundits International

caruba_alan20080111By Alan Caruba ~

AA - Feminism-these-daysMy generation, born in the late 1930s and the 1940s, has witnessed a dramatic change in the role and the rights of women in America. A significant result of the women’s liberation movement is a change in the role of traditional marriage that was reported in early September.

“If you count a generation as spanning 20 years,” wrote Terence P. Jeffery, an editor of CNSnews.com, “then approximately 36 percent of the American generation born from 1993 through 2012—which has begun turning 21 this year and will continue turning 21 through 2033—were born to unmarried mothers.”

By comparison, Jeffrey noted that “Back in 1940, only 3.8 percent of American babies were born to unmarried mothers. By 1960, it was still only 5.3 percent.” There was a time when being a single mother was regarded as a reflection of the woman’s moral values. How a society deals…

View original post 809 more words

Political Correctness is Tyranny With Manners


Not all entertainers were jerks and there are still a few today that get it!

deacon303's avatarWhiskey Tango Foxtrot

Political correctness is tyranny with manners. - Charlton Heston Political correctness is tyranny with manners. – Charlton Heston

View original post

Salon tool: ‘Nothing scares a white American more than someone who isn’t a white American’


I’m an old white dude and ex military (Nam) and nothing scares me more than a Marxists or a Progressive race is ill-relevant, I have many non white brothers that I served with .

HILLARY CLINTON: QUEEN OF DECEIT


You got that right …

A. L. Luttrell's avatarARLIN REPORT...................walking this path together

Featured Image -- 548

The drama queen will be running for president in 2016, everyone knows it, she knows, we know.   Hillary likes drama, plenty follows her where ever she goes.

The early campaign slogan is “Ready for Hillary”.   I have read blogs saying “I am ready for a lady prez”.  Really…..lets vote Hillary in for president because she is a woman?   I don’t have an issue voting for a lady as president, just not Hillary, she is no “Lady”.

Another comment read recently, “Another reason I would vote for Hillary as president is, she knows how things work in the White House.”   Exactly why I do not want Hillary as my president.   The way things are getting done, the controversy and scandals that have followed Hillary during her career, why would we even consider putting her in the highest office?

One word describes Hillary R. Clinton:  DECEIT

View original post

Now Entire ISIS Opposition Command Mysteriously Blown Up in ‘Unexplained’ Explosion


This may not be 100% true but there is enough here to cause concern; since we do know that this administration does not have our best interest at heart!!

Bombing Was ‘Not Act of Terrorism’ -Boston Marathon Victims Denied Insurance Reimbursement


Crooked politicians and attorneys, but then I repeat myself, always find ways to make us think one thing but really means something else. Like having insurance that doesn’t really cover anything because of the “fine” print.

deacon303's avatarWhiskey Tango Foxtrot

Were you under the assumption that the Boston Marathon bombings were an act of terrorism? Maybe it was because just after the bombings, the President said this:

“Any time bombs are used to target innocent civilians it is an act of terror.”

Turns out, if you look into the details, he actually never said it was an act of terrorism. There was much discussion about the whys and wherefores after his statement, and the mincing of the difference between the words “terror” and “terrorism” went on for quite some time.

Now, the Treasury Department has given its imprint on the perspective as well. And they haven’t “certified” it as an “act of terrorism,” either.

The context is the Terrorism Risk Insurance Act, which was passed just after the 9/11 attacks. It’s a federally-administered and underwritten insurance program for terrorism-caused damage, designed to be relatively inexpensive but to compensate policy owners…

View original post 254 more words

I’m a Rambling Man


Great write up … keep it up!

T Lee Humphrey's avatarPA Pundits International

TLeeHumphrey_AvatarIt’s been a hectic summer since I last wrote 2 articles about ISIS/L quickly moving into Iraq and the release of Bowe Bergdahl. I wrote those pieces during the first half of June. While the Bergdahl story has all but disappeared as we await the decision by military investigators on whether or not to court martial him the ISIS/L story has grown to a point that President Obama has had to make a prime time address to the nation about his decision to order a comprehensive and long term air campaign against the group in both Iraq and in Syria.

In June I wrote about his failed policy decision in 2010 and 2011 that led to the morphing of ISIS/L from a defeated entity in Iraq into a bi-country terrorist army occupying much of the Levant region so I won’t bore you with a rehash of my thoughts on how…

View original post 3,227 more words

Susan Rice: It’s Not a War Because We Don’t Have Combat Boots on the Ground


If Susan Rice had a brain she would move up to the status of idiot! Its like saying we are using kinetic military action instead of saying we are or were in a fire fight with the enemy. Sanitized words so you really don’t know what they are saying.

deacon303's avatarWhiskey Tango Foxtrot

“Is the United States at war right now with ISIS?” asked CNN’s Wolf Blitzer during an interview with Rice, adding that it “sounds like a war to me” and asking “Is it fair to call it a war?”

“Well Wolf, I don’t know whether you want to call it a war or a sustained counterterrorism campaign,” she said, reminding him that Obama had vowed not to put U.S. combat boots on the ground.

She explained that when Americans thought about war, it was clear that they would think about the wars in Afghanistan and Iraq.

“We’ll not have American combat forces on the ground fighting as we did in Iraq and Afghanistan, which is what I think the American people think of when they think of a war, so I think this is very different from that.”

Susan Rice: It’s Not a War Because We Don’t Have Combat Boots on…

View original post 39 more words

The Fallacy Of Congressional Ethics


The fox guarding the hen house or is this case the crooks guarding the vault — they all seem to leave the government very very wealthy!

realitybloger's avatarREALITY BLOG

What is the “Senate Select Committee On Ethics”?

Well, simply stated, it is a group of six Senators who advise the other 94 Senators and their staff on whether or not those other 94 Senators, as well as themselves, are acting ethically within their duties as Senators – according to the their own made-up “Senate Rules”.

From the Senate Ethics Committee official website we read:

“Members, officers, and certain employees of the United States Senate, related offices, and candidates for the Senate are required by Title I of the Ethics in Government Act of 1978, as amended (the “Act,” 5 U.S.C. app., Section 101 et seq., also adopted as Senate Rule 34) and Senate Rule 41.1 to file Financial Disclosure Reports with the Secretary of the Senate, Office of Public Records.

The Act gives the Senate Select Committee on Ethics the authority to administer the law for the Senate

View original post 12,808 more words

Retired General John Allen Selected for ISIS Campaign – And New Levels of Dot Connections Follow…..


Nothing said here that counters anything I knew and being former Special Operations the account is how I would have done it if I was still in.