Parliamentary advisor to the German Bundestag Has Come Out Warn the People


Warnung an die Bevölkerung
Anonym, September 2020
Parlamentarischer Berater des Deutschen Bundestages
Liebe Mitbürgerinnen und Mitbürger,
ich wende mich als Mitarbeiter des Deutschen Bundestages mit der Funktion eines parlamentarischen Beraters an Sie. Durch meine Tätigkeit im Parlament habe ich Kenntnis davon, dass den Menschen in unserem Land wichtige Informationen in Zusammenhang mit der Coronakrise gezielt vorenthalten werden, obwohl diese zur Beurteilung der Situation von entscheidender Bedeutung sind. Ich sehe es, bedingt durch die enorme Tragweite der jüngsten Ereignisse als Pflicht gegenüber meinen Mitbürgern an, diese Dinge öffentlich zu thematisieren.
Vermutlich werden viele diesen Text bereits nach wenigen Zeilen zur Seite legen, weil sie sich eine vorsätzliche Täuschung der Bevölkerung nicht vorstellen können. Ich habe Verständnis dafür, denn auch ich hätte früher eine derartige Vorstellung als “Verschwörungstheorie” abgetan. Doch mittlerweile musste ich, nicht zuletzt durch meine Erlebnisse im Bundestag erkennen, welche Methoden weltweit von Regierungen, Medien und einflussreichen Akteuren der Privatwirtschaft zu unser aller Nachteil angewendet werden und dass die Bevölkerung dem leider zu häufig zu unkritisch begegnet. Ich hoffe dennoch, dass der eine oder andere meine Hinweise zumindest überprüfen wird.
Aufgrund der besorgniserregenden Tatsache, dass kritische Stimmen in Deutschland mittlerweile diffamiert, angegriffen und in ihrer Existenz regelrecht vernichtet werden, bin ich gezwungen, dieses Schreiben anonym zu veröffentlichen. Auch meine Fraktionszugehörigkeit kann ich aus demselben Grund nicht angeben. Diese spielt ohnehin keine Rolle, denn wir müssen in Deutschland dringend wieder lernen, uns “lagerübergreifend” zuzuhören und zu respektieren. Wenn wir nicht bald zu einem solchen Miteinander zurückfinden, wird unsere Gesellschaft endgültig in verfeindete Gruppen zersplittern. Leider hat der Umgang mit Corona bereits jetzt dazu beigetragen, die gesellschaftlichen Gräben weiter zu vertiefen. Insofern ist es für mein Anliegen zielführend, die Angabe meiner Fraktion offenzulassen. Nachweise für meine Tätigkeit im Parlament sind am Ende des Dokuments angefügt.
Sie, liebe Leserin und lieber Leser, sollen nur Folgendes über mich wissen: Ich schreibe diesen Bericht in aufrichtiger Sorge um die Sicherheit, die Freiheit sowie den Wohlstand von uns allen. Diese tragenden Säulen unserer Demokratie sind akut gefährdet, denn die Coronakrise wird von verschiedenen Seiten her instrumentalisiert und unsere berechtigten Sorgen wegen des Coronavirus werden für fremde Ziele missbraucht und ausgenutzt.
Ich muss an dieser Stelle betonen, dass ich die Gesundheitsrisiken in Zusammenhang mit dem Virus nicht verharmlosen will. Corona kann insbesondere für ältere sowie vorerkrankte Menschen eine ernste Gefahr sein, dieser Fakt ist unbestritten. Gleichzeitig muss ich jedoch feststellen, dass verschiedene Akteure mit verzerrender Berichterstattung und aus dem Zusammenhang gerissenen Horrorbildern systematisch Angst in der Bevölkerung verbreiten und damit ein Bild der Pandemie zeichnen, dass nicht der Realität entspricht. Ziel dieser Kräfte aus Politik, Weltwirtschaft und Medien ist es, von weitreichenden politischen und wirtschaftlichen Veränderungen abzulenken, die im Hintergrund der Krise ablaufen und für die Corona “wie gerufen” kommt.
Weiterhin sollen die Menschen in ihrer Angst vor dem Virus Maßnahmen und dauerhafte Einschränkungen akzeptieren, die angesichts der Situation in keiner Weise gerechtfertigt sind und die gegen die Interessen der Bevölkerung verstoßen. Vieles davon ist mit öffentlich zugänglichen Quellen nachvollziehbar, die eigentlichen Ziele der Maßnahmen werden den Bürgern dabei jedoch verschwiegen. Über diese Hintergründe möchte ich Sie mit meinem Bericht informieren und ich lade Sie herzlich ein, meine Ausführungen zu überprüfen, noch bevor Ihnen diese Möglichkeit durch breite Zensur dauerhaft genommen wird.
I.
Das Weltwirtschaftsforum WEF (a2) als Sprachrohr der einflussreichsten internationalen Konzerne und Großbanken instrumentalisiert die Krise, um eine lange vorbereitete Agenda zur Neuordnung der gesamten Weltwirtschaft umzusetzen (1). Dieser “Great Reset” wird uns dabei als Wandel der Globalisierung hin zu einer nachhaltigen Wirtschaft verkauft, doch handelt es sich hierbei um eine Täuschung. Tatsächlich wollen die Akteure des WEF damit eine weitestgehende Zentralisierung der politischen Macht in überstaatlichen Institutionen wie der UN, EU und dem IWF erreichen, sowie völlig neuartige, supranationale Organe schaffen. Über diese Organisationen wollen sie die demokratische Kontrolle der Weltwirtschaft und -politik durch gewählte Parlamente dauerhaft aushebeln, weil sich aus ihrer Sicht bislang zu viele Nationalstaaten den Privatisierungsorgien der Konzerne und der Finanzspekulanten nicht beugen wollen.
Darüber hinaus will man den Mittelstand endgültig verdrängen und die freiwerdenden Markt

TRANSLATION:

Warning to the population
Anonymous, September 2020
Parliamentary advisor to the German Bundestag
Dear fellow citizens,
I am addressing you as an employee of the German Bundestag with the function of a parliamentary advisor. Through my work in Parliament, I am aware that important information in connection with the corona crisis is being withheld from people in our country, although this is of crucial importance for assessing the situation. Due to the enormous scope of recent events, I see it as my duty to my fellow citizens to publicly discuss these things.
Presumably, many will put this text aside after just a few lines, because they cannot imagine deliberately deceiving the population. I understand that, because I would have earlier dismissed such an idea as a “conspiracy theory”. But in the meantime, not least through my experiences in the Bundestag, I have had to recognize which methods are being used by governments, media and influential actors in the private sector around the world to the detriment of all of us and that unfortunately the population is too often too uncritical about this. I still hope that one or the other will at least check my hints.
Due to the worrying fact that critical voices in Germany are meanwhile being defamed, attacked and literally destroyed in their existence, I am forced to publish this letter anonymously. For the same reason, I cannot state my group membership. This does not play a role anyway, because we in Germany urgently need to learn again to listen to and respect each other “across camps”. If we don’t soon find our way back to such a togetherness, our society will finally split up into hostile groups. Unfortunately, dealing with Corona has already contributed to deepening the social rifts. In this respect, it is expedient for my concern to leave the information given by my group open. Evidence of my work in Parliament is attached at the end of the document.
You, dear reader, should only know the following about me: I am writing this report with sincere concern for the security, freedom and prosperity of all of us. These supporting pillars of our democracy are acutely endangered because the corona crisis is being instrumentalized from various sides and our legitimate concerns about the corona virus are being misused and exploited for foreign goals.
I have to emphasize at this point that I do not want to play down the health risks associated with the virus. Corona can be a serious danger, especially for older people as well as those with previous illnesses, this fact is undisputed. At the same time, however, I have to state that various actors with distorting reporting and horror images taken out of context are systematically spreading fear in the population and thus painting a picture of the pandemic that does not correspond to reality. The aim of these forces from politics, the global economy and the media is to divert attention from the far-reaching political and economic changes that are taking place in the background of the crisis and for which Corona comes “as called”.
Furthermore, in their fear of the virus, people should accept measures and permanent restrictions that are in no way justified in view of the situation and that go against the interests of the population. Much of this can be traced back to publicly available sources, but the actual goals of the measures are concealed from the public. I would like to inform you about this background with my report and I cordially invite you to review my remarks before this option is permanently denied you by broad censorship.
I.
The World Economic Forum WEF (a2), as the mouthpiece of the most influential international corporations and big banks, is instrumentalizing the crisis in order to implement a long-prepared agenda for the reorganization of the entire world economy (1). This “Great Reset” is sold to us as a change in globalization towards a sustainable economy, but this is a delusion. In fact, the actors of the WEF want to achieve the greatest possible centralization of political power in supranational institutions such as the UN, EU and the IMF, as well as to create completely new, supranational organs. Through these organizations, they want to permanently undermine the democratic control of the world economy and politics by elected parliaments, because from their point of view too many nation states have so far refused to bow to the privatization orgies of corporations and financial speculators.
In addition one wants to displace the middle class and the market that is becoming free

The Head Adviser on Vaccines has Stock in the Company Charged with Making the Vaccine for UK


The Chief Scientific Adviser, who is leading the Government’s expert panel on vaccines, has 43,111 shares in GlaxoSmithKline (GSK) from his time as president of the drugs company. This is the company the UK government has contracted to make the vaccine. The Government has denied arguments that this is a potential conflict of interest, asserting that he is not involved in commercial decisions on coronavirus vaccines.

London Police Attack COVID Protestors on Saturday 9/26/2020


Once again, the London police continue to support the government and attacked peaceful protestors in Trafalgar Square. No matter what the evidence, the government is maintaining these Draconian lockdowns. We can see that the protest was peaceful until the police showed up to brutally abuse the rights of the people that will suppress their own family’s future.

Unfortunately, the London police are supporting absolute tyranny. This is clearly part of this global agenda to hand sovereignty to the United Nations. It may sound more like a conspiracy theory, but already there is talk in London that they will next use these lockdowns to combat Climate Change. Keeping people from commuting to work to reduce fuel consumption. Mariana Mazzucato, a professor in the Economics of Innovation and Public Value at University College London and also a Founding Director of the UCL Institute for Innovation and Public Purpose. She has bought into the UN agenda and claims that the world is “approaching a tipping point on climate change, when protecting the future of civilization will require dramatic interventions.”

Mazzucato is suggesting that if we do not reduce CO2, then these lockdowns will be justified to save the planet. We are already dealing with a fake pandemic, which is clearly being used to expand the powers of government. They have Europe in their back-pocket, New Zealand, and of course Australia under the insane control of the madman Daniels Andrews. Above, is street art in Melbourne against this orchestrated agenda. What has escaped most of the headline is what is going on in Canada. Prime Minister Justin Trudeau who has suspended Parliament. This battle to overthrow Trump is part of this Globalist Agenda. If they can get rid of Trump, then all that stands in their way is China and Russia. They intend to impose sanctions to try to force them to comply with this UN Agenda.

 

Sky News – Something is Strange in Europe


 

Florida Governor Reopens State – Removes Restrictions on Restaurants, Nullifies All Local Mask Ordinances, Blocks Fines and Penalties…


Florida Governor Ron DeSantis has moved the entire state into phase three of the COVID-19 recovery plan.  All restrictions against restaurants and businesses are removed by executive order [HERE] and all local mask ordinances are nullified by the same order.

♦ No COVID ordinance may forbid or impede any business from operating.

♦ No COVID ordinance may forbid restaurants to operate below 50% capacity. Any local ordinances against these operational thresholds are nullified.

♦ No local mask ordinances shall carry any weight of enforcement.

♦ No COVID Fines or Penalties may be applied toward any individual or business operating in the State of Florida.  (executive order)

 

Did The First Lockdown Trigger The Second Wave?


The good news? If Trump wins, they won’t be able to stop that great awakening from spreading. Nor will they escape accountability.

Mark Gray image

Re-Posted from the Canada Free Press By  —— Bio and ArchivesSeptember 24, 2020

Did The First Lockdown Trigger The Second Wave?

COVID-19’s second wave will fail worse than the first. Politicians will use it to justify further tyranny now, but as the second wave recedes it will leave fully exposed the dark heart of evil that runs our lives. Our “leaders” will eventually rue the day they embraced totalitarianism.

If the answer to the title question is yes, the coming “second wave” is an “unexpected consequence” of the lockdown as we were told we’d be “safe” if we agreed to an aggressive response that included shutting schools, parks, and businesses down, quarantining the healthy, and following some sketchy safety guidelines.

Original COVID-19 models were critically flawed, producing alarming projections at odds with reality

We now know beyond any reasonable doubt that the original COVID-19 models were critically flawed, producing alarming projections at odds with reality. That panicked alarm, not the ignored reality, is what spread across the globe like wildfire, and in doing so created the “need” for a strong political response explicitly designed to “save” us.

The politicians who swallowed the COVID Kool aid, which is to say, all of them, leapt into action with liberty shredding decisions to shut down this, lock down that, and coerce abeyance with idiotic “safety” guidelines. Putting on a mask to enter a restaurant only to pull it off at the table, for example, makes no logical sense. It obviously isn’t about safety, which means it must be about the rule, or more specifically, the right to enforce the silly rule.

The entire political response—every rule, regulation, law, mandate, and guideline—was designed to save us from a false perception, not the underlying reality of a greater than 99.9% survival rate. Building solutions based on seriously bad information will always lead to “unexpected” consequences because the problem being solved doesn’t exist. This ignorance ensures policy failure, essentially guaranteeing harsh, negative consequences for us all.

If you prefer images, picture a surgeon removing the wrong limb as an example of bad information driving negative consequences.

First Wave Consequences, Second Wave Troubles

It is important to note that many of the first wave lockdown consequences were fully expected, and because of their ferocious impact, were initially sold as a short term, temporary solution. The politicians knew locking everything down would lead to massive job losses, personal and business bankruptcies, misdirected taxpayer resources, a loss of health services, which is a real health crisis, and a gross violation of civil liberties. They knew their decisions would hurt, yet they proceeded without hesitation. They knew then, and they know even better now. And yet?

The media’s second wave reporting has focused heavily on the recent rise in “number of cases” across the country, stoking fears on the assumption of a direct, causal relationship between cases and deaths.  This thinking makes sense on the surface as deaths quickly followed the rise in first wave cases, but this case-death correlation doesn’t show up in the second wave statistics, an indicator the virus is struggling to find viable victims.

This hasn’t slowed the media’s frantic fear mongering in the slightest, and they continue to press the idea that further lockdown measures are a political necessity because we face another wave of viral massacre. However, if the second wave rise in cases is an “unexpected” consequence of the first’s mistaken lockdown, something that shouldn’t have occurred, then its value to the decision-making process is also suspect and should be reviewed.

So, is there any evidence that indicates the “second wave” is a negative consequence of misguided “first wave” lockdown policies?

The Data Damns Our Decision Makers

The first two charts compare Daily COVID-19 Deaths between lockdown UK and non-lockdown Sweden, which allows us to explore the impact UK lockdown policies had on deaths.  The second two charts add the number of daily cases into the mix, allowing us to evaluate the relationship between cases and deaths for the UK and Sweden in both the first and second waves.

Daily New Deaths In United Kingdom

Daily New Deaths In Sweden

 

Although the UK and Sweden took different routes, the similarity between the lockdown and non-lockdown death curves is apparent, as is the inference that lockdowns had little effect on the lethality of the virus.

Now, let’s take a peek at the Daily Case numbers.

Daily New Deaths vs Cases in United Kingdom

Daily New Deaths vs Cases in Sweden

Fight ELITIST SUPPRESSION—Make CFP Your Go-To Home Page!There is a substantial difference in the Daily Case curves between the UK and Sweden, suggesting that although lockdown policies have little impact on daily deaths, they do have a significant effect on how the virus spreads.

While Sweden’s decision to remain open delayed the peak of their first wave Daily Cases curve, the chart shows deaths peaked and began dropping long before the virus finished spreading at its quickest. The chart shows Sweden’s second wave arrived and departed between August and September without causing a respective rise in deaths. In fact, the Daily Death curve shows no upward bounce at all.

The UK’s Daily Cases, strangely enough, began climbing after their summer mask mandate. However, the “expected” rise in Daily Deaths failed to materialize.

So,

  • Lockdown policies did set the stage for a second wave.
  • COVID-19 has lost its lethality and any rise in “second wave” deaths will likely resemble a ripple rather than a tsunami.
  • The political/media complex want us to live in lockdown. (Evil a hard pill to swallow?)

News vs Fake News

Generally speaking, the purpose of “News” is to inform. It may enhance the value of that information by adding context related analyses but by and large, News occurs after the act has happened and does its best to bring perceptions in line with reality.

Conversely, because Fake News eschews reality, it must lead with a lie of desire rather than follow the truth of events. Its success is determined by how well it is able to convince people to believe things that aren’t true, such as COVID-19 being the worst viral bug since the early 1900s, and then exploiting that belief to force political action, which then “legitimizes” the Fake claim and fuels the next News cycle. From that point there is only one acceptable direction: Forward!

Belief is key, because once set it automatically protects itself by immediately rejecting contradictory facts and figures that would destroy it. How else can we rationalize mask mandates for populations with survival rates over 99.99%, like the 8 provinces not named Quebec and Ontario? How does the call to shut down schools and mask-up children comport with this report showing zero deaths, none, out of over 48,000 cases in US Universities?

The logical disconnect is obvious, but it still isn’t enough to unseat the Fake belief “we’re all gonna die”. This leaves us fearful and exploitable. Share some COVID-19 truths with a masker then sit back and watch. You will often see the alarm grow in their eyes as the cognitive dissonance sets in. Unfortunately, that alarm is typically silenced by rejecting the painful truth and ending the discussion.

Why are western societies across the globe teetering on the brink of totalitarian terror? Because Fake News, evil as it is, works! We either eliminate it from our lives or it will continue to eliminate freedom from ours.

The world really is in an existential battle between good and evil. The rioting, lockdowns, and hatred roiling the globe are not signs of a revolution so much as they are panicked signals the corrupt cabal running things is being systematically exposed. They will get uglier.

The good news? If Trump wins, they won’t be able to stop that great awakening from spreading. Nor will they escape accountability.

COVID vaccine clinical trials doomed to fail; fatal design flaw; NY Times opinion piece exposes all three major clinical trials


Or, do the vaccine manufacturers have a devious trick up their sleeves?

Jon Rappoport image

Re-posted from the Canada Free Press By  —— Bio and ArchivesSeptember 24, 2020

 

COVID vaccine clinical trials doomed to fail; fatal design flaw

PART ONE: THE FAILURE

Peter Doshi, associate editor of the medical journal BMJ, and Eric Topol, Scripps Research professor of molecular medicine, have written a devastating NY Times opinion piece about the ongoing COVID vaccine clinical trials.

They expose the fatal flaw in the large Pfizer, AstraZeneca, and Moderna trials.

September 22, the Times: “These Coronavirus Trials Don’t Answer the One Question We Need to Know”:

Clinical trials are dead in the water

“If you were to approve a coronavirus vaccine, would you approve one that you only knew protected people only from the most mild form of Covid-19, or one that would prevent its serious complications?”

“The answer is obvious. You would want to protect against the worst cases.”

“But that’s not how the companies testing three of the leading coronavirus vaccine candidates, Moderna, Pfizer and AstraZeneca, whose U.S. trial is on hold, are approaching the problem.”

“According to the protocols for their studies, which they released late last week, a vaccine could meet the companies’ benchmark for success if it lowered the risk of mild Covid-19, but was never shown to reduce moderate or severe forms of the disease, or the risk of hospitalization, admissions to the intensive care unit or death.”

“To say a vaccine works should mean that most people no longer run the risk of getting seriously sick. That’s not what these trials will determine.”

This means these clinical trials are dead in the water.

There is no need to create a vaccine that prevents mild cases

(Read about Jon’s mega-collection, The Matrix Revealed)

The trials are designed to show effectiveness in preventing mild cases of COVID, which nobody should care about, because mild cases naturally run their course and cause no harm.  THERE IS NO NEED FOR A VACCINE THAT PREVENTS MILD CASES.

Now let’s go deeper.  Read the next section from the Times piece, and then I’ll make comments.

“The Moderna and AstraZeneca studies will involve about 30,000 participants each; Pfizer’s will have 44,000. Half the participants will receive two doses of vaccines separated by three or four weeks, and the other half will receive saltwater placebo shots. The final determination of efficacy will occur after 150 to 160 participants develop Covid-19…”

Here’s how it works.  The vaccine companies are looking for a total of 150 (mild) COVID cases to occur, combined, in the two groups; those receiving the placebo and those receiving the vaccine.  How would that happen?  The researchers believe ‘the coronavirus is spreading everywhere and it will pounce on some of the volunteers in the clinical trial.’

Let’s say that, during the trial, 100 people receiving the placebo develop mild COVID-19, and only 50 people receiving the vaccine develop mild COVID.

The vaccine companies would say, ‘We just proved the vaccine is 50% effective in preventing COVID, and that’s all we need to do, in order to win authorization from the FDA.  Release the vaccine.  Inject the world.’

The irrelevant outcomes for 150 people equal ‘let’s shoot up seven billion people.’  That’s staggering.

But it gets even worse.  The magic number of 150 COVID cases?  How is a COVID case defined?  The authors of the Times piece have the answer:

“In the Moderna and Pfizer trials, even a mild case of Covid-19 – for instance, a cough plus a positive lab test – would qualify and muddy the results. AstraZeneca is slightly more stringent but would still count mild symptoms like a cough plus fever as a case.”

But wait.  The NY Times itself recently published an article stating that up to 90% of US COVID cases could very well be false positives—-in other words, not cases at all.  Why?  Because the diagnostic PCR test, as it is performed by many labs, is too sensitive.  It registers ‘positive for COVID’ when it shouldn’t.

So, in these vaccine clinical trials, the whole process of determining that ‘150 people developed COVID-19’ is completely unreliable, useless, absurd, and nonsensical.

Other than that, the clinical trials are perfect.  Yes, perfectly ridiculous.

There is much more in the Times opinion piece, but I’ll leave it there.

“So the magic number is 150?  That’s the number that will decide the immediate fate of the planet?”

“Of course.”

“And these 150 people, who you say develop COVID-19…you really can’t confirm that because the definition of a COVID case is so vague and the PCR test is so unreliable.”

“Correct.”

“And come to think of it, the people receiving the vaccine in the clinical trials could develop symptoms indistinguishable from COVID-19, as a result of the effects of the vaccine.”

“Yes, that’s right.”

“But you’re very confident in the success of the vaccine.”

“Indeed.”

“Why?”

“I have to be confident.  If we’re exposed as incompetent frauds, our bottom line will take a huge hit.”

“Thank you, sir.  And that’s tonight’s news.  Make sure you take the vaccine, everyone.  It’s vital.  This is Fred J Clown, for CBS-NBC-ABC-CNN-FOX-PBS-AP-Reuters and all official news sources East, West, North, and South.  The News, brought to you by Venom-X-2, a medicine that has only 463 adverse effects.  Ask your doctor if Venom is right for you.”

PART TWO: THE DEVIOUS TRICK

Now I’m going to go over the vital information again, but this time I’m going to show you how…

The vaccine companies can use the fatal flaw in their protocol design to…

Actually win approval of their COVID vaccine.

Stick with me.  This is big.

Only 150 people are needed to make the major clinical trials of a COVID vaccine look like a success.

Out of 30,000 volunteers in a trial, researchers are waiting for 150 people to “come down with COVID-19.”  MILD cases.  They assume this will happen because they believe the coronavirus is everywhere, and it’ll infect their volunteers.

Of course, their definition of a mild case of COVID-19 is meaningless.  Cough plus fever, and a positive PCR test.  The test spits out false positives like a rigged slot machine, and the visible symptoms could result from flu, polluted air, or too many candy bars.

Nevertheless, the researchers are waiting for a total of 150 people to “catch a mild case of COVID.”  When that number is reached, everything stops.

Now comes the big moment.  How many of those 150 COVID cases occurred in the group that received the vaccine, and how many in the group that received the placebo shot of salt water?

Let’s say only 50 COVID cases occurred in the vaccine group, and 100 in the placebo group.  The researchers pop champagne corks.  They say, “Look, the vaccine is 50% effective at preventing COVID, and that’s all we need to win authorization from the FDA.”

BUT suppose 70 cases occurred in the vaccine group and 80 in the placebo group?  No good.  No good at all.  No way to call the vaccine effective.

Now comes the “reshaping of the data.”

HERE WE GO.

Fight ELITIST SUPPRESSION—Make CFP Your Go-To Home Page!

Vaccine Companies want success and money now.  They want to win the race

The researchers say, “Wait.  Thirty of the COVID cases in the vaccine group were REALLY just adverse reactions to the vaccine.  They weren’t cases of COVID.  You see, the vaccine can cause symptoms that are indistinguishable from mild COVID.  Cough, fever, chills.  ACTUALLY, there were only 40 cases of COVID in the vaccine group.  Half as many as in the placebo group.  The vaccine IS 50% effective.  We don’t really need to wait until we have a total of 150 COVID cases.  We’re good.  We’re golden.  We can get authorization from the FDA right now to shoot up everybody in America!”

Vaccine manufacturers HAVE KNOWN ALL ALONG that they could pull this trick.

Why leave things to chance?

Why risk a few hundred billion dollars of profit on a random distribution of mild COVID cases among the volunteers in their clinical trials?

There is yet a further devious twist.  The New York Times article I just analyzed torpedoed the vaccine manufacturers for designing their trial protocols to prevent MILD cases of COVID.  Why?

Because no one needs a vaccine that can do that.  Mild cases are not a problem or a threat.  They cure themselves quickly.  No vaccine is necessary in the first place.

BUT the definition of a mild COVID case is EXACTLY what the vaccine manufacturers needed.  It enabled them to hatch a plan, to make sure they didn’t fail.

They could pawn off a MILD case of COVID on a vaccine reaction.  They could fake that without causing ripples.  The FDA would say, “The vaccine reactions aren’t serious.  All right, no problem.  We’ll approve this vaccine for emergency use.”

However…If the manufacturers designed their clinical trial protocol to prevent serious cases of COVID, they would be waiting to see 150 cases of really sick people to occur.  That might never happen.

If it did happen, and the manufacturers had to pull their devious switcheroo trick and blame the vaccine for some of these SERIOUS cases…

They would have to tell the FDA that their vaccine was causing life-threatening pneumonia; and the FDA, under a lot of scrutiny these days, would find it very difficult to overlook that.

FDA: “We can’t approve this vaccine.  It could cause a few million cases of dire pneumonia…”

The vaccine companies didn’t make a titanic stupid mistake in their protocol design.  In gearing the protocol to prevent MILD COVID cases, they did what they did on purpose.  It allows them to “reshape their data” and win FDA approval for their vaccine.

These companies have no intention of failing, starting over, and spending a year recruiting 30,000 new volunteers.  They want success and money now.  They want to win the race.

And they could win, if the truth isn’t known and shared widely.

(The link to this article posted on my blog is here.)

Senator Rand Paul Confronts Dr. Anthony Fauci For Months of Lies and Manipulative Statements….


Senator Rand Paul confronted Dr. Anthony Fauci today about his history of false claims, lies and manipulative statements surrounding the COVID-19 virus and direction for U.S. mitigation efforts.  It’s about time someone called the baby ugly.

Anthony Fauci, a political ideologue and leftist advocate, was the primary government influence that has led to trillions in economic damage and impacted the lives of all Americans with false assertions and brutally political virus mitigation efforts.

.

COVID-19 hype was a political effort with assistance from U.S. media.

“Fish do not know they are in water”  ~Sundance

 

How CDC/WHO will fake the effects of the COVID vaccine to make it look like a success


And appointing official mouthpieces to carry lies to the public is as easy as training little Faucis to sit up and bark

Jon Rappoport image

Re-Posted from the Canada Free Press By  —— Bio and ArchivesSeptember 22, 2020

How CDC/WHO will fake the effects of the COVID vaccine to make it look like a success

Making a vaccine look like it’s a champion isn’t difficult for public health agencies.  There are a number of strategies.

Of course, these fraudulent strategies would be serious crimes.  But when has that stopped the CDC or the World Health Organization?

In no particular order——

(To read about Jon’s mega-collection, The Matrix Revealed)

ONE: Rework the definition of a “COVID case.” Presently, the CDC absurdly allows doctors to diagnose a person with COVID who has a cough, or chills and fever, and lives in an area where cases are being claimed.  No test necessary.

So change this practice, once the vaccine is approved.  Demand testing for a diagnosis.  State that cough alone is not enough.  Chills and fever must also be present.  Require fever to be above 100.

These and other changes would automatically shrink the number of cases.  The drop in numbers would be attributed to the vaccine.

This “definitional shrinking” was, in fact, deployed in the 1950s, after the introduction of the polio vaccine.

TWO: Order a change in the way the PCR diagnostic test is done.  The practice of amplifying the original test sample from the patient occurs in cycles, or jumps.  The greater the number of cycles, the more likely the test will result in a COVID diagnosis.  Therefore, order a reduced number of cycles for all testing labs.

Outcome?  Fewer COVID diagnoses.  Fewer case numbers.  “The vaccine is working.”

THREE: Quietly restrict the present hospital practice of arbitrarily writing “COVID” on patient case and death files.

FOUR: Cook up and publish false studies showing more and more people are developing immunity to the virus.  Attribute this to the vaccine.

FIVE: Another type of false study—-“the transmission of the virus from person to person is slowing, thanks to the vaccine.”

SIX: Pump up the success of issuing Immunity certificates after vaccination. “People are feeling safer now.  More businesses are reopening…”

SEVEN: Using the compliant press, simply issue bald declarations that the vaccine is a success.

EIGHT: Hide the many instances of injury and death from the vaccine. When necessary, claim COVID was the cause.

NINE: Warn that the wonderful vaccine-derived immunity is not permanent, and frequent booster shots are necessary.

TEN: Rework the definition of “vaccine-acquired immunity.” Even a very weak antibody response from the shot would qualify as “protective immunity.”

ELEVEN: Huge numbers of people with ordinary flu-like illness, pneumonia, and other traditional lung infections are being called “COVID.”  Change this practice.  Go back to calling many of these people “flu,” “pneumonia,” etc.  COVID case numbers will drop.  Claim the drop is the effect of the vaccine.

TWELVE: Presently, millions of so-called COVID cases have “co-morbidities.”  These are prior serious health conditions which are, in fact, the true causes of illnesses and death.  Of course, this is denied.  But after the vaccine is introduced… scale back the practice of counting all these ill and deceased co-morbid patients as “COVID.”  Case and death numbers will drop.  Claim the vaccine is the reason.

THIRTEEN: After the vaccine is introduced, slow down testing for a brief period.  This will automatically reduce the rate of new cases.  Attribute the decline to the vaccine.

Committing these crimes are a walk in the park for public health agencies.

And appointing official mouthpieces to carry lies to the public is as easy as training little Faucis to sit up and bark.

(The link to this article posted on my blog is here.)

The New Norm – OMG


The Economist just ran a story that summarized the change in work that “people particularly fond of their pyjamas [sic] have for decades been arguing that a lot of work done in large shared offices could better be done at home. With covid-19 their ideas were put to the test in a huge if not randomized trial. The preliminary results are now in: yes, a lot of work can be done at home; and what is more, many people seem to prefer doing it there.”

The collapse in security in major cities such as New York have led to only 54% of companies expecting to return to New York City. In fact, only 8% of employees have returned to the office as of mid-August. Based upon a very RELIABLE source, the violence in the cities has been encouraged by Democrats for more than just trying to overthrow Trump. This has also been part of the agenda to end commuting by car to reduce CO2. They have deliberately sought to end commuting to save the planet. The problem has been that these Democratic mayors are ignorant of the real objective and think they are helping to just overthrow Trump. What they have failed to see is the bigger picture. People are fleeing the big cities and moving out to the suburbs. Real estate in the suburbs has risen in price while city properties are collapsing with no-bid.

According to the FT, Covid19 has given the world 3 years more oil supply.
The editor of the London Financial Times sent out this letter:

“It has been just over six months since London went into lockdown and the FT newsroom changed overnight from a bustling, crowded office to a dispersed, digital workplace. The Covid-19 pandemic has been an unparalleled test for organisations and governments around the world — and to all of us as parents, colleagues and friends. I hope the FT has passed this test by delivering the news, insight, analysis and intellectual stimulation you need to navigate this fast-changing world.

Looking ahead to the coming months, the FT aims to be your trusted guide to the new normal. We have passed through the first wave of the global crisis. Now, we face the new reality of living with the virus. Local and national outbreaks will continue to disrupt the fragile economic recovery. Crucial policy decisions on travel, employment support and stimulus occur with dizzying speed.”

Indeed, the New Norm is intended to bring in the Great Reset whereby offices vanish, commuting comes to an end, and travel will be forever restricted. However, vital to pulling this off is continued social distancing and masks. Why? This is being employed to combat civil unrest. It is also intended to separate the mindless sheep who obey whatever the government, says which complies with Stanley Milgram’s studies on Obedience to Authority.

The Germans put on trial after World War II said that they were just following orders. This inspired Milgram to investigate because many argued that the Germans were just different and could kill the Jews without remorse. At the Nuremberg Trials, those Germans simply said they were just following orders.

Stanley was perhaps the most important psychologists of all time as far as I am concerned. Instead of coming up with a theory, Stanley actually investigates and arrived at a conclusion nobody suspected was even possible. He hired actors to pretend to be shocked by a person whenever they lied. Stanley took random people off the street in the United States and elsewhere to see if the Germans were really a different species. He discovered that people would shock others in a torture setting as long as they were told that was what they had to do.

Stanley concluded his studies which shocked the world. They were published in his book – “Obedience to Authority.” I bring this up now BECAUSE this is precisely what is being carried out today. We have people wearing masks when there is no serious pandemic and yelling at others who do not. Some are violently attacking people who do not have a mask.

 

What is being carried out is a well-defined psychological tactic because they instill fear in the mass herd of human sheep and then they count on the obedience of authority to control society. I have stated before, a friend of mine grew up behind the Berlin Wall. When the wall fell, his father went an got his Stasi file. He was shocked to discover everyone he thought was a friend was telling the government everything he had to say against the government. When he came home, my friend thought his father went mad. He began punching holes in the walls and ripping out microphones. Until his death, he refused to ever speak to anyone outside his immediate family.

This is the reasoning being the social distancing and wearing masks. This (1) provides justification to arrest people who try to gather together to resist, and (2) as in France, they can put you in prison for 6 months for not wearing a mask or in Melbourne, Australia, attacking even women on the street who do not have a mask on. This is raw tyranny and how they are deliberately seeking to breakdown society to make the population controllable as was the case under communism.

Field Marshall Hermann Wilhelm Göring (1893–1946)

 “Why, of course, the people don’t want war. Why would some poor slob on a farm want to risk his life in a war when the best that he can get out of it is to come back to his farm in one piece. Naturally, the common people don’t want war; neither in Russia nor in England nor in America, nor for that matter in Germany. That is understood.

But, after all, it is the leaders of the country who determine the policy and it is always a simple matter to drag the people along, whether it is a democracy or a fascist dictatorship or a Parliament or a Communist dictatorship.

With respect to a Democracy they argued, the people have some say in the matter through their elected representatives, and in the United States, only Congress can declare wars.

Göring replied: “Oh, that is all well and good, but, voice or no voice, the people can always be brought to the bidding of the leaders. That is easy. All you have to do is tell them they are being attacked and denounce the pacifists for lack of patriotism and exposing the country to danger. It works the same way in any country.”

Welcome to the New Norm. These things are well defined. Once you understand what can be accomplished, then you can see their strategic plan. Since 1992, countries have signed on to Agenda 21 with the United States to inventory everything in the world along with the population. You MUST understand that there is this idea of a one-world government that would prevent wars. Here you have the former French Prime Minister bolding explaining this very idea was behind creating the Eurozone. They are seeking to do this globally and they have made their move here in 2020. This is not a conspiracy theory. I disagree that they will ever be able to pull it off. That does not mean those in power will not try.

Gates has been feeding into this agenda and seeks to push for digital currency so the tech companies will get a piece of every transaction in the world. He then is involved in food production and vaccines under the pretence of helping people when he is afraid of over-population.

The NEW NORM is less freedom if any remains. It will be more likely that you will need a permit to have a child, as was the case with the one-child rule in China that failed.