This is exactly what is happening , but it is intentional not from unintended consequences as they want the turmoil so they can continue make make changes to the constitution until it is all gone. These refuges just become another democratic party voting block and as the old saying goes divide we fall united we stand.
Tag Archives: Valarie Jarrett
Is Anyone Really Surprised? – School Grades Improve When Cell Phones Are Banned….
No study was needed anyone that still has a functioning brain could see the young walking down the streets working the mobile devices (like shown in this pictures). I would also bet they get into more accidents not even counting driving.
The LIERs
Post By Prof. Paul Eidelberg
Who are the “LIERs”? The LIERs are a consortium of Libertarians, Internationalists, Egalitarians, and Relativists. These LIERs dominate the news and other opinion–making media.
A favorite pastime of the LIERs is Israel-bashing. Media bias against Israel assumes obscene proportions whenever Israel retaliates against Arab terrorists—be it Hamas in Gaza, Fatah in Jenin, or Hezbollah in Lebanon.
Some commentators attribute the media’s anti-Israel bias to Arab threats against journalists. Probably true in some cases, but Arab threats do not account for all the venom the LIERs spew against Israel.
Other commentators attribute the mediacracy’s bias to anti-Semitism. There’s some truth in this, but it’s superficially understood. I’ll come back to this later.
Still others ascribe the anti-Israel bias to the LIERs’ underdog mentality. Israel is portrayed as the Goliath in its conflict with those poor, little people, the “Palestinians,” who are compelled to use their own children as human bombs in this uneven conflict.
But is it right to sympathize with Arab terrorists that use women as human shields? I ask these questions because it’s absurd to apply the Geneva Convention to Arab terrorists. When you think seriously about these terrorists, when you behold their cruelty, their inhumanity, their contempt for human life, it’s not only absurd to endow these monsters with the rights of the Geneva Convention; it makes that Convention a mockery of human dignity. But for the Vatican to join the LIERs and align the Church with the Palestinian Authority’s quest for statehood when the PA virtually drove Christians out of Bethlehem is more than hypocrisy. It’s using the PA to gain control of Jerusalem!
This may explain why the “Religion of Love” denounced the IDF’s counterattack against Hezbollah operating from Lebanon. Prime Minister Bibi Netanyahu has repeatedly said that Israel has a right to defend itself. Whoever questioned this right? Isn’t national self-preservation an axiomatic duty of government? But having descended to psycho-babble about Israel’s right to defend itself, Bibi has repeatedly implored the PA to recognize Israel as a Jewish state! Where does this Jewish Don Quixote come from?
Probing deeper, where did this ridiculous need to invoke the axiomatic principle of national self-defense and consequent use of force against foreign aggression originate? Here’s the story.
Back in the 1920s, Julian Benda, a most insightful Frenchman, warned of the pacifist mentality that was emasculating France, a mentality that would lead to the Second World War. In The Treason of the Intellectuals, Benda anticipated what I call the LIERs—the Libertarians, Internationalists, Egalitarians, and Relativists of today’s opinion-makers. He noted that in the perverse minds of these LIERs justice becomes suspect when backed by force.
I am not suggesting that “might makes right.” But to denigrate right when it is invested with might is to ensure the victory of the wicked. This is the crime the LIERs of the media perpetrate by their slanderous attacks against Israel. Let’s probe deeper into these LIERs.
Given their Libertarianism, LIERs oppose all restraints on their freedom of expression. As a case in point, a member of their ilk in the U.S. Senate fantasized about getting the FCC to shut down Fox News!
When all is said and done, however, it’s hard to understand why LIERs, given the meaning of each letter of this acronym, side with illiberal and despotic Arabs and are so often hostile toward democratic Israel. Here we return to anti-Semitism.
Israel, perceived as a Jewish state, symbolizes nationalism. This offends the Internationalism of the LIERs. Moreover, the Bible refers to the Jews as the “Chosen People.” This offends the Egalitarianism of the LIERs. The LIERs also oppose any display of the Ten Commandments in the public domain. This offends the moral Relativism of the LIERs.
Israel therefore represents the absolute antithesis of what the LIERs represent. Now one can better understand why the LIERs demonize and want to delegitimize Israel, the Nation which, through blood and tears, carried the Truth from Sinai.
The downfall of Christianity in Europe
It’s very simple, Mohammad was the first anti-Christ then he came back as Marx’s the third time is the last and it could be Obama.
in 1910 some 66 per cent of the world’s Christians lived in Europe. Now that number has fallen to about 25.
The Queen of England and the Popeof Rome both represent false Christiaity.
We are living through the biggest religious transition since the Reformation of the 16th Century,” says Linda Woodhead, professor of the sociology of religion at Lancaster University.
“[Prime Minister] David Cameron may have said at Easter that ‘we are still a Christian country’, but for how much longer?”
The Church of England and the Church of Scotland are in collapse,” says Ms Woodhead.
“The Church lost touch with our everyday life and has become inward-looking rather than being a broad Church for the whole of society.
According to demographer Conrad Hackett at Pew Research Center in the US., in 1910 some 66 per cent of the world’s Christians lived in Europe. Now that has fallen to about…
View original post 498 more words
Obama’s Education Secretary Calls for Government Boarding Schools: “There Are Just Certain Kids We Should Have 24/7″
If you thought the loss of parent’s rights over what level of government brainwashing their child is subjected to within the regular public school system was bad enough in this country, check out the new idea radical Obama Education Secretary Arne Duncan was throwing around last week while speaking at the National Summit on Youth Violence Prevention: public boarding schools.
He was quoted as saying, “That’s a little bit of a different idea — a controversial idea — but the question is do we have some children where there’s not a mom, there’s not a dad, there’s not a grandma, there’s just nobody at home?”
And why exactly is no one home? Because the middle class is being systematically murdered and everyone who isn’t on government welfare or part of the .0001% has to work multiple jobs just to keep a roof over their heads and the lights on these days?
So why not let the government be these kids’ family?
See the whole agenda at work here?
Duncan also proposed even more “after-school programming” as part of the “‘cradle-to-career’ education agenda” via The New American:
Claiming that there are “just certain kids we should have 24/7,” the controversial figure also proposed, citing inaccurate information, turning government schools across America into “community centers” that would offer students even more “after-school programming.” Despite escalating criticism of Duncan and his scheming — one analyst called it “scary” — the proposed plots were hardly surprising considering other elements of what senior officials often refer to as the “cradle-to-career” education agenda.
In essence, according to Duncan in various speeches, government schools, now largely controlled from Washington, D.C., are being used as a “weapon” to “change the world.” With the United Nations Educational, Scientific, and Cultural Organization (UNESCO) as what the education secretary called his “global partner,” public education will also serve as a tool to transform children into what he described as “green citizens.” If Obama’s “Green Jobs” Czar Van Jones had not been forced to resign over his self-declared revolutionary communist views, he could have even placed the newly minted “green citizens” into the “green jobs” Duncan says the feds are preparing them for.
The feds… preparing our nation’s children… as a “weapon” to “change the world.”
Wow.
How very Hitler of them.
Others in our government have been heavily pushing the idea of even longer school days. Last year, New Jersey Governor Chris Christie wanted to extend the school lunch program into a school dinner program to go along with longer school days/years. President Obama has proposed almost the same thing since 2009 – along with a universal daycare program (that’s right, universal) to get even more kids into government education centers at an even earlier age for longer and longer periods of indoctrination.
Government boarding schools, however, takes the indoctrination cake.
Can you just imagine the world our government is building up all around us? The future this country is looking at under the constant government social engineering and “leadership” of these people?
It’s bad enough already that our schools openly teach to the middle, many using convoluted and confusing Common Core methods to further dumb down an already deliberately dumbed down populace where, above all, critical thinking skills are not just downplayed but are actively being stamped out altogether the nation’s children over.
Now the government wants some kids to be completely shipped off Agenda 21-style to government education (read: brainwashing) camps where parents will not only have zero input on what these children are being taught (while the kids are turned into mindless government drones), but the parents will barely even see their children at all.
I bet somewhere in classified government documents the public is not allowed to see, this too is referred to as “national security.”
Reminds me of what social engineer Bertrand Russell once said:
“Education should aim at destroying free will so that after pupils are thus schooled they will be incapable throughout the rest of their lives of thinking or acting otherwise than as their school masters would have wished…. Influences of the home are obstructive; and in order to condition students, verses set to music and repeatedly intoned are very effective…. It is for a future scientist to make these maxims precise and discover exactly how much it cost per head to make children believe that snow is black. When the technique is perfected, every government that has been in charge will be able to control its subjects securely without the need of armies or policemen.”
Melissa Dykes is a writer, researcher, and analyst for The Daily Sheeple and a co-creator of Truthstream Media with Aaron Dykes, a site that offers teleprompter-free, unscripted analysis of The Matrix we find ourselves living in. Melissa also co-founded Nutritional Anarchy with Daisy Luther of The Organic Prepper, a site focused on resistance through food self-sufficiency. Wake the flock up!
Don’t forget to follow the D.C. Clothesline on Facebook and Twitter. PLEASE help spread the word by sharing our articles on your favorite social networks.
The Sources of the Founders’ Ideas
By Prof. Paul Eidelberg
“What, in fact, were the sources of the Founders’ ideas regarding the Constitution?” David Barton responds as follows:
Political science professors believed that this question could be answered by organizing a broad spectrum of writings from the Founding Era with the goals of identifying the sources cited in those writings. The researchers assembled 15,000 representative writings from that period and isolated 3,154 direct quotes back to their original sources, thereby identifying the most frequently-cited sources of the Founding Era. (The results of that study may be found in Barton’s The Origin of the American Constitution.)
The individual cited most often in the writings of the Founding Era was the political philosopher Charles Montesquieu, with 8.3 percent of the quotes being taken from his writings. Legal scholar William Blackstone was next, with 7.9 percent of the quotes, and … John Locke was third, with 2.9 percent. These were the three most frequently-cited individuals during the Founding Era, but the single most-cited was the Bible, with 34 percent of the quotes coming from the Scriptures.
Significantly, that percentage is even higher when the source of ideas used by individuals such as Montesquieu and Blackstone are identified and included… [for they themselves] had used the Bible to help arrive at their own conclusions.
American scholars, even of classical Greek orientation, have ignored this evidence, having read America’s Founding Fathers with Lockean glasses.
END THIS TYRANNY
Tyranny is defined in the Merriam Webster Dictionary as: cruel and unfair treatment by people with power over others; a government in which all power belongs to one person. Escaping the tyranny of a monarch was the reason America was founded. Our Declaration of Independence from another country, England, states: “That whenever any Form of Government becomes destructive of these ends, it is the Right of the People to alter or to abolish it, and to institute new Government, laying its foundation on such principles and organizing its powers in such form, as to them shall seem most likely to effect their Safety and Happiness.” Our forefathers fought a war to earn America’s freedom from tyranny.
Our Founding Fathers wanted to be sure that America would remain the country of free people. To that end, they provided a legal, peaceful method within our Constitution to strip an internal tyrant of power. It is the tool of Impeachment defined in the Constitution, Article II, Section 4: “The President, Vice President and all Civil Officers of the United States, shall be removed from office on impeachment for, and conviction of, Treason, Bribery, or other high Crimes and Misdemeanors.” The House of Representatives issues the impeachment charges and the Senate conducts the trial.
Two American Presidents have been impeached. Andrew Johnson, the 17th President, was impeached on grounds of disregarding the Tenure of Office Act of 1867. It prohibited a President from dismissing office holders without the Senate’s approval. He was impeached by the House of Representatives for trying to throw Edwin Stanton, the Secretary of War, out of office. The Senate was one vote short of the two-thirds majority needed to convict him and he was acquitted May 26, 1868. Political maneuvering is cited as the reason there was not a conviction.
William J. Clinton, the 42nd President, was the second impeached. He was charged with four crimes and impeached in the House of Representatives on two of those, grand jury perjury and obstruction of justice. Again, the Senate failed to secure the two-thirds majority needed to convict and he was acquitted February 12, 1999. Again, political maneuvering is cited as the reason there was not a conviction.
Also, Richard Nixon, the 37th President, had three articles of impeachment issued by the House of Representatives on July 20, 1974. Nixon resigned his office on August 9, 1974, before the House voted to impeach him.
In all three instances, the Constitution did its job. What the Founding Fathers did not foresee was that people elected to represent the citizens would thwart our country’s guiding document, the Constitution, for personal or party gains. America has evolved into two parties, the Democrats and the Republicans. For too many of those elected to our Congress, the desire to keep their individual power and to maintain their party’s control over spending our tax dollars is more important than ensuring that the Constitution is enforced.
Another safeguard in the Constitution to protect us against tyranny is the assignment of specific powers to three separate branches of the Federal Government, the Executive, Legislative and Judicial branches. No branch may infringe on the powers of the others. By not taking the appropriate action, impeaching Obama, the Congress has subjected us to having a Tyrant, not a President, heading the Executive branch of the Federal government.
In August, 2013, Business Daily listed several laws Obama has broken. He chooses what laws do and don’t suit his needs and ignores the latter. He is usurping the law-making power the Constitution gives solely to the Legislative branch of the Federal government, the Congress.
Obama circumvented the immigration law, deciding not to deport illegal immigrants under the age of 30. He unilaterally has and continues to change Obamacare. These are only two examples on a very long list. After Congress enacts a bill and the President signs it, it is the law of the land. It can not be changed arbitrarily. Changes are legal only when they are introduced and approved by the Congress as a revocation of or an amendment to the original law.
Business Daily also lists actions Obama has taken that usurp the power the Constitution gives only to the Judicial branch of the Federal government. This tyrant ignores court decisions. Re-imposing a moratorium on off-shore drilling after the courts struck down his original moratorium and refusing to remove his appointees to the National Labor Relations Board after those appointments were ruled unconstitutional are only two examples of his illegal actions.
It is time for Congress to follow the rules; it must act and do what the Constitution demands. Breaking laws and usurping power are not allowable actions for any President. It is time to impeach and to try the forty-fourth President, Barack Obama. This tyrant must be stopped in order to preserve America as it was intended to be, a country of free people without a tyrant or a central power controlling her citizens.
This time, politics can not be allowed to over-ride the Constitution. Those in Congress who value their individual power and their party’s control over spending our tax dollars more than working for our best interests must be stopped. Use your voice, your vote, your power as citizens. Demand that Congress represent our interests by impeaching and convicting the tyrant in the Executive Branch. Save America from Obama by stripping him of his office. Return control of America to her citizens.
Unfortunately, Americans face an intentional lack of education in our public-school system to teach our youth how America is governed and their role and responsibility as citizens. So, citizens must educate themselves. Read the Constitution. It is readily available on line or in many libraries. Before you vote again, prepare to cast an informed vote. Know what candidates have achieved and what their actions demonstrate about their belief in protecting our individual rights and freedoms. Research candidates yourself; make your own decisions. Elect those who will live by their job description as it is defined in our Constitution. That job is to represent us.
Kathleen M. Dynan
The Most Highly Educated Citizens of America
Post By Prof. Paul Eidelberg
Americans spend an enormous amount of money for the education of their youth. Hardly anyone draws a connection between the content of this education, as articulated in the social sciences, the humanities, the law schools, and America’s decline as a world power. Let me illustrate this phenomenon by means of the character of President Barack Obama.
If Mr. Obama is rightly called an “Empty Suit,” this may be construed to mean that Obama is a deceptively “Invisible Man” in a visible suit. What made him invisible from the beginning is that he has no obvious or substantive national identity. Has he not called himself a “cosmopolitan,” a man without a country?
Has he not been rightly denominated as a “post-American” president? What does this mean in depth, in truth, and not in journalese? It means that Obama lacks any moral or intellectual attachment to America’s two foundational documents, the Declaration of Independence and the American Constitution.
Moreover, since the definitive and pivotal concept of the Declaration of Independence is “the laws of Nature and of Nature’s God,” which are obviously universal and immutable. Obama has effectively defined himself as a multicultural moral relativist, which means that Obama is a functional atheist or pagan nihilist.
Unsurprisingly, this defines the mentality of his Supreme Court appointments. Like Obama, the Court has ruled in favor of same-sex marriage, which is rampant in the Third World, especially in Africa with which Obama is very much identified. Obama, wherever he was born, is anything but a “red, white, and blue” American.
Indeed, his denial of “American Exceptionalism” is consistent with his multicultural moral relativism. But this relativism is nothing more than a euphemism for atheism, more precisely, nihilism. Nihilism has been rampant in American higher education for many decades, as may be seen in my essay, “Intellectual and Moral Anarchy in America Society,” which was published in the Congressional Record (Senate) in 1968.
We must therefore conclude that Obama represents the mentality of most university professors (roughly 80%), and that his election to the highest office in the land may be attributed primarily to America’s most highly educated citizens and opinion makers!
Waco “Twin Peaks” Shooting Updates: 14 Police Officers Fired “thousands of rounds” on 200 Bikers Killing 9, Wounding 18 – Two Thirds Of Those Arrested Had No Prior Criminal History…
It sounds like a lot of BS to me!
Time is like a river. You cannot touch the water twice, because the flow that has passed will never pass again.
This post was written by a USMC Vet. (I can’t argue with any of it. Passing it along as it was received.)
Franklin Graham was speaking at the First Baptist Church in Jacksonville, Florida a few weeks back when he said America will not come back. He wrote:
The American Dream ended (on November 6th, 2012 ) in Ohio . The second term of Barack Obama will be the final nail in the coffin for the legacy of the white Christian males who discovered, explored, pioneered, settled and developed the greatest Republic in the history of mankind.
A coalition of Blacks, Latinos, Feminists, Gays , Government Workers, Union Members, Environmental Extremists, The Media, Hollywood , uninformed young people, the “forever needy,” the chronically unemployed, illegal aliens and other “fellow travelers” have ended Norman Rockwell ‘s America . The Cocker Spaniel is off the front porch… The Pit Bull is in the back yard. The American Constitution has been replaced with Saul Alinsky ‘s “Rules for Radicals” and Chicago shyster, David Axelrod , along with international Socialist George Soros will be pulling the strings on their beige puppet to bring us Act 2 of the New World Order.
Our side ran two candidates who couldn’t even win their own home states, and Chris Christie helped Obama over the top with a glowing “post Sandy ” tribute that elevated the “Commander-in-Chief” to Mother Teresa status. (Aside: with the way the polls were run, he didn’t need any help!) People like me are completely politically irrelevant, and I will never again comment on or concern myself with the afore mentioned coalition which has surrendered our culture, our heritage and our traditions without a shot being fired.
You will never again out-vote these people. It will take individual acts of defiance and massive displays of civil disobedience to get back the rights we have allowed them to take away. It will take Zealots, not moderates & shy not reach-across-the-aisle RINOs to right this ship and restore our beloved country to its former status.
Those who come after us will have to risk their lives, their fortunes and their sacred honor to bring back the Republic that this generation has timidly frittered away due to “white guilt” and political correctness… An American Veteran……… Semper-Fi
Got the guts to pass it on? You betcha!
You betcha I’m a former Green Beret
Centinel2012 