Tag Archives: xyID2020

Mar 18 2022

Forbes Fires Journalist Who Revealed Fauci’s Finances


Armstrong Economics Blog/Media Re-Posted Mar 17, 2022 by Martin Armstrong

Adam Andrzejewski reported that Dr. Anthony Fauci became America’s highest-paid public employee amid the pandemic, and that report cost him his job at Forbes. The war on journalism is on. Everything Andrzejewski reported is public record — Fauci earned $1.7 million in 2020, and his wife Christine, who also works at NIH, earned $234,284 in 2020. The Fauci’s household net worth now exceeds $10.4 million.

Forbes was not happy with Andrzejewski’s reporting, and the situation reached a peak in January 2022 when US Senator Roger Marshall (R-Kan) cited the Forbes article while questioning Fauci’s financial disclosures. Fauci pulled a Biden and called the senator a “moron” on a hot mic. OpenTheBooks sued NIH in October 2021 for failing to provide the 1,200-page report of Fauci’s hidden financials. Rather than questioning the money flowing to Fauci, Forbes blamed their own journalist for exposing the skeletons in the closet.

Caroline Howard, the executive editor at Forbes, reached out to Andrzejewski to question why he wrote three articles on Fauci in three weeks. Howard accused Andrzejewski of reporting his personal “opinion” rather than fact, despite him citing his sources and maintaining journalistic integrity. Only six of his 56 published articles from 2021 to 2022 mentioned Fauci, but that was still too much for Forbes.

The National Institute of Health should have no say on public reporting and their eagerness to censor the truth should raise suspicions. The NIH reached out to Forbes demanding that they change the terminology surrounding Fauci’s gala attendances to “received” rather than “collected,” along with other minor changes, but they found nothing wrong with Andrzejewski’s overall report. Forbes fired Andrzejewski two days later.

All news agencies have been compromised. All news is now government-sponsored and/or edited. The truth is not easily available, but it is out there if one cares enough to seek it out.

Mar 18 2022

Tucker Carlson Revisits the Media People Who Manipulated the Hunter Biden Laptop Story


Posted originally on the conservatoire tree house on March 17, 2022 | Sundance

On his evening broadcast Fox news host Tucker Carlson took a historic look at how the media manipulated the Hunter Biden laptop story in order to protect Joe Biden as a candidate.  These same media personalities claim they are credible, and viciously attack anyone who points out their lies.   The example of the BIden laptop should forever dispatch any credibility they claim to hold.  WATCH: 

.

Not included in the Carlson review, but one of the most transparently biased segments on the Biden laptop issue, was the interview between CNN disinformation specialist Christiane Amanpour and Liz Harrington.  Given the recent revelations about the authenticity of the Biden laptop, watch this video of Amanpour trying to protect the regime.

.

The Follow-up (below) is when it gets heated.

.

Mar 10 2022

American Heart Association Warns About Vaccines


Armstrong Economics Blog/Disease Re-Posted Mar 10, 2022 by Martin Armstrong

American Heart Association:

“We conclude that the mRNA vacs dramatically increase inflammation on the endothelium and T cell infiltration of cardiac muscle and may account for the observations of increased thrombosis, cardiomyopathy, and other vascular events following vaccination.”

This statement was labeled by Twitter as “unsafe.” I suppose that Twitter is run by heart surgeons now. This seems to be a simple agenda. Force mandatory vaccines to justify international COVID passports that the World Health Organization is introducing thanks to Gates Foundation and the Rockefeller Foundation — the two most concerned about over-population. The advice coming from Fauci who claims he himself is SCIENCE, which amounts to trying to interpret Nostradamus or reading tea leaves. Why is Twitter so intent on supporting ONLY fake news? There is just nobody on our side at all anymore.

Mar 7 2022

Candace Owens Interviews Dr. Robert Malone – Part 1 & 2


Posted originally on Rumble on March 7, 2022

Mar 7 2022

EMR Survey: Ivermectin Associated with Lower Mortality Than Remdesivir


Posted originally on TrialSite New by Staff March 5, 2022

EMR Survey Suggests Ivermectin Associated with Lower Mortality Than Remdesivir

A team of University of Miami researchers compared fatality rates for COVID-19 patients who took ivermectin and those who took remdesivir and found the ivermectin cohort experienced reduced mortality.

“Ivermectin use was associated with decreased mortality in patients with COVID-19 compared to remdesivir,” the authors wrote.

The authors determined that ivermectin’s odds ratio of mortality compared to Remdesivir was 0.308.

Ivermectin vs. Remdesivir

Ivermectin has been discouraged as an early treatment option by the United States Food and Drug Administration, Centers for Disease Control and other public health authorities, while remdesivir has been endorsed by those same authorities.

Subscribe to the Trialsitenews “COVID-19” Channel

No spam – we promise

“To our knowledge, this is the largest association study of patients with COVID-19, mortality and ivermectin,” said the authors. “Further double-blinded placebo-controlled [random controlled trials] with large samples are required for definite conclusion.”

University of Miami Research Team

The researchers included medical student Iakov Efimenko, medical student Sirpi Nackeeran, Sinan K. Jabori, MD, Associate Program Director of the Infectious Disease Fellowship Jose Gonzalez Zamora, MD; Sara Danker, MD, and Devinder Singh, MD, all of whom are affiliated with University of Miami’s Miller School of Medicine.

TriNetX Research Network Searched 

The team searched patient records on the TriNetX Research network, a federated electronic medical records network of over 44 healthcare organizations and 68 million U.S. patients from 2009 to 2021 to identify adults with a recorded COVID-19 infection between January 1, 2020, and July 11, 2021. 

The team then compared those with recorded use of ivermectin, but not remdesivir, against those with recorded use of remdesivir, but not ivermectin. 

The team also controlled for comorbidities and treatments that may affect COVID-19 survival outcomes: age, gender, race, ethnicity, nicotine use diabetes mellitus, obesity, chronic lower respiratory disease, ischemic heart diseases, tocilizumab, glucocorticoids, or ventilator use.

Mortality Primary Outcome

The group measured association with mortality as the primary outcome.

The team identified a cohort of 1,072 people who were treated with ivermectin and another 40,536 who were treated with remdesivir. 

In the ivermectin cohort, the average age was 51.9 + 17.8 years, 43% were male, 60% had glucocorticoids, and 1% required ventilator support, average age. 

In the remdesivir cohort, the average age was 62.0 + 16.0 years, 54% were male, 64% had glucocorticoids, and 2% required ventilator support. 

Ivermectin Reduced Mortality vs. Remdesivir by 70%

After using propensity score matching and adjusting for potential confounders, ivermectin was associated with 70 percent reduced mortality vs remdesivir with a risk difference of -5.224%.

Mar 4 2022

Study: Pfizer mRNA Vaccine Integrates Into Our DNA


Armstrong Economics Blog/Disease Re-Posted Mar 4, 2022 by Martin Armstrong

A new Swedish lab study shows that the mRNA vaccine integrates into our DNA at the cellular level – permanently.

Study abstract:

"Furthermore, a recent study showed that SARS-CoV-2 RNA can be reverse-transcribed and integrated into the genome of human cells. In this study, we investigated the effect of BNT162b2 on
the human liver cell line Huh7 in vitro. Huh7 cells were exposed to BNT162b2, and quantitative
PCR was performed on RNA extracted from the cells. We detected high levels of BNT162b2 in Huh7
cells and changes in gene expression of long interspersed nuclear element-1 (LINE-1), which is an
endogenous reverse transcriptase. Immunohistochemistry using antibody binding to LINE-1 open
reading frame-1 RNA-binding protein (ORFp1) on Huh7 cells treated with BNT162b2 indicated
increased nucleus distribution of LINE-1. PCR on genomic DNA of Huh7 cells exposed to BNT162b2
amplified the DNA sequence unique to BNT162b2. Our results indicate a fast up-take of BNT162b2
into human liver cell line Huh7, leading to changes in LINE-1 expression and distribution. We also
show that BNT162b2 mRNA is reverse transcribed intracellularly into DNA in as fast as 6 h upon
BNT162b2 exposure."

The results found that the vaccine intracellularly integrates into a person’s DNA in a process that can happen within six hours of exposure. Additionally, the mRNA vaccine does in fact travel to the liver and other locations such as ovaries. The messenger RNA travels outside of the nucleus to target proteins required for building cells (e.g., growing muscle tissue) in a process called transcription.

Scientists told us that the vaccine would not affect our DNA in any way. Rio Times reported, “For many years, Central Dogma of Molecular Biology stated that the “reverse transcription” — moving genetic code from RNA back into the sacred cellular nuclear and recoding the DNA — was impossible.” The compromised and biased scientific community eventually realized that reverse transcription was possible, as seen within the HIV RNA virus that does reprogram and replicate DNA.

Pfizer’s vaccine produces the LINE-1 enzyme, which is one of the enzymes required for reverse transcriptase. What does this mean for those who have taken this vaccine? There is growing concern that the vaccine is also affecting the “germ line,” which affects female eggs and male sperm cells, as well as forming fetuses. The long-term side effects of the vaccine have not been determined and the pharmaceutical companies have already lobbied governments to grant them full immunity for when those side effects are revealed.

Mar 3 2022

Pfizer Vaccine Only 12% Effective in Children 5 to 11


Armstrong Economics Blog/Corruption Re-Posted Mar 2, 2022 by Martin Armstrong

The government urged parents to expose their children to an experimental drug with unknown consequences to prevent a virus that has a statistically insignificant death rate for children (and adults). The New York State Department of Health announced that a new study found Pfizer’s vaccination was only 12% effective for children aged 5 to 11.

Pfizer was distributing the same dosage for undeveloped 12-year-olds as it was to fully grown adults at 30 micrograms. Children under 11 only received 10 micrograms of the mRNA vaccine. Pfizer and BioNTech was forced to push back their study on children under the age of 5 after they were forced to admit the vaccine has been ineffective.

The New York State Department of Health chose to release their allegedly new findings the same day that children were finally permitted to attend school without a mask. The fear here is that the powers that be could give us, and our children, a glimpse of freedom only to take it back. “Given rapid loss of protection against infections, these results highlight the continued importance of layered protections, including mask wearing, for children to prevent infection and transmission,” the public health officials wrote in the study.

The FDA is planning a clinical trial on a third booster shot for children. They will market this to the sheep by saying that the first two doses were ineffective, so their child’s life depends on yet another dose. Did you enjoy playing at recess without a mask? Good, now take another higher dosage of a protein-altering medication that is more likely to kill you than the virus itself. The World Health Organization has even admitted that healthy children do not need boosters.

Pfizer, BioNTech, Moderna, the FDA, and anyone peddling these vaccines to children should face class-action lawsuits and serious penalties. This is domestic biowarfare that is targeting the most vulnerable among our population.

Mar 3 2022

Florida Governor Ron DeSantis Tells Students They Can Take Their Masks Off, Media Goes Bananas


Posted originally on the conservative tree house on March 2, 2022 | sundance

Some students from Middleton High School in Florida were in attendance for Gov. Ron DeSantis’ announcement of a cybersecurity training initiative at the University of South Florida.

As the Florida governor approached the podium, he said: “You do not have to wear those masks. I mean, please take those off. Honestly, it’s not doing anything. We gotta stop with this covid theater. If you want to wear it fine, but this is ridiculous.”

The media immediately went bananas at the audacity of the governor for giving students the option to remove their masks.

The media is apoplectic (see below for headlines).  Newsweek said DeSantis “scolded” them.  Business Insider said Desantis “snapped” at them.  Yahoo News says DeSantis “bullied” them.  CNN said that DeSantis “yelled” at them.

Feb 27 2022

COVID-19 Vaccine Responsible for False-Positive Syphilis Tests


Armstrong Economics Blog/Disease Re-Posted Feb 27, 2022 by Martin Armstrong

The US Food and Drug Administration (FDA) has admitted that people who received the COVID-19 vaccine are falsely testing positive for syphilis. “More research is underway to determine the extent of the issue. It is not known if other RPR tests may be affected similarly. Treponemal testing for syphilis such as Treponema pallidum particle agglutination (TP-PA) and treponemal immunoassays do not appear to be impacted by this issue,” the FDA said.

“False-reactive RPR testing also have been previously observed following immunization (specifically following smallpox vaccine),” a member of the CDC reported. The CDC member also stated that “false-reactive RPR test results have been observed in people with systemic infections unrelated to syphilis.” Could the protein spike from the mRNA vaccine be the culprit? Although health institutions claimed that the body would stop producing spike proteins within weeks, the FDA has admitted that is inaccurate. “Based on information provided by the manufacturer, Bio-Rad Laboratories, RPR false reactivity was observed in some individuals for at least five months following a COVID-19 vaccination.” The vaccine manufacturers owe it to the public to release what is in these vaccines.