While we need some form of rule of law and independent body to appeal to for complaints, there is no question that government is by far the most evil invention ever created by human-kind. When you actually look at how government begins, we can see that they heart of the problem is always greed and power. Today, police can personally just dislike you and find a numerous excuses to charge you with something. They are fighting hard to keep $167,000 that simply just stole from an individual who was never charged with any crime whatsoever. This is outright criminal activity on the part of government and judges are hopelessly corrupt in their judgment for they are appointed by government and expected to do the government’s bidding. My father took a judgeship in a local town when I was a kid. The politicians complained that he did not impose the maximum fine on everyone who appeared in court. He quit because he would not do as they commanded. Guess it was in the genes.
King Solomon was renown for his wisdom yet this story from the Bible illustrates the origin of government and the role of the king. At this point in time, the king was the benevolent father of his country. He was there as the independent judge for private disputes since he did not benefit either way from any decision. There were no fines to be collected which then gives the government incentive to ensure you are guilty. He fulfilled his obligation as king – to be there FOR THE PEOPLE, not against them for his personal exploitation.
Even in ancient Greece, something like murder was never a State crime. To be prosecuted by the State such as Socrates, required theft from the State or offending the gods, which was Socrates’ crime. If someone kill anyone in your family, it became your DUTY to bring a prosecution – not the State. This separation between public and private acts which restrained the State, was also the reason why you would have family feuds largely in Eastern European culture. If someone in my family killed someone in yours, then your family was within its right to retaliate against ANYONE within my family. So the act was not even personally punishable but one family against another. This was the origin of the concept of the feuds.
There was also the ancient practice of “deodand” whereby the object that caused the death of another was donated (forfeited) and sold to pay for the funeral of the victim. Under this doctrine, a chattel (property) involved in the accidental death of a person would be forfeited to the Crown which would then be sold for the prayers of the departed. It was not for the personal benefit of the Crown as is the case today. Our modern governments have usurped the religious power as far as the government gets to seize property, but it no longer has anything to do with its origins. Government has replaced God and the money is simply theirs. Today, civil asset forfeiture is an out crime against the people by a greedy totalitarian state and judges reach back to claim an ancient power torn from its origins to benefit government. There is no longer an accidental death with the proceeds being donated for prayers. This is just grab the money which no longer serves any moral purpose but filling the pockets of government and police pensions.
The US Supreme Court relies on deodand to justify the confiscation of property to enrich the coffers of government no different than someone who robs you on the street at gun-point. It is the object that is guilty, not the owner under this ancient practice. This is really an example how judges are owned by government and do not defend the constitution or the the people. They can claim someone sold drugs from your home and seize it for the house committed the crime – not you. The constitution means nothing and it is just a scrap of paper as long as we have pretend judges who are appointed by politicians to rule in favor of government. How else do you achieve virtual 99% conviction rates with court appointed lawyers who are experts at losing cases.
Several states’ constitutions in the USA explicitly prohibit deodand or equivalent practices, most often in the context of property left behind by one who commits suicide. These states are Missouri (Art. 1, §30) , New Hampshire (Pt. 2, Art. 89), Tennessee (Art. 1, §12), and Vermont (Ch. II, §65). What is now happening is that throughout Europe, including England, everyone is following the lead of the USA thanks to the Supreme Court that has justified confiscating any property the state desires and you no longer need to be a criminal. Just the mere possession of wealth today is justification from what has become armed robbery. There is no difference from a thug on the street holding a gun to your face and demand all your money and jewelry and a police officer doing the exact same thing. Try leaving Italy with a lot of gold jewelry. They take you aside and weight it. If it is too much in the OPINION of the policeman, say goodbye to your property.
The goldbugs should stop the nonsense about market manipulations and wake up. You will not be able to have gold since storing it in a safe deposit box is now money laundering and if you try to travel with it, well here comes civil asset forfeiture and they do not need to prove anything for it is the gold that commits the crime by its sheer existence. Welcome to the age of the Sovereign Debt Crisis and DEFLATION. If you have been waiting for hyperinflation you will not see that before you die. They are hunting money like a blood sport. This is all about them – not honoring promises. When it comes time to have to honor any unfunded promise, they will simply default. Historically, government always defaults for they are the most evil invention of society.
And people wonder why Trump is soaring in the polls? Hey, we will not change anything with establishment career politicians Democrat or Republican. We are reaching the point of insanity and society will go through the classic control-alt-delete reboot just to survive.
Love it 🙂
Trump is our man and if he destroys the RNC in the process who cares they haven’t listened to us in decades!
Obama and the ststists want control of everything and they get it by eliminating all small businesses. Of course, this also eliminates the middle class which they also wish to eliminate as from the middle class come future innovators which will then threaten the rich and powerful.
In 2013, in a little-heralded case, the U.S. Court of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit rejected the Obama Labor Department’s attempt to punish voluntary retirement plan service providers. The DOL, under the direction of the controversial, radical leftist Tom Perez, had tried to force providers of 401(k), 403(b), IRA, and related services to adopt a massive new set of regulations known as “fidiculary” responsibilities.
The Seventh Circuit slammed the door shut on Labor and the Supreme Court thereafter declined to hear the appeal, which meant that the Obama administration had lost in the highest court in the land.
Of course for the “most transparent administration ever”, that step simply meant that the court’s opinion was to be rejected and that Obama would use his infamous pen to rule by executive fiat. After all, the ends justify the means, correct?
On August 24th, Perez and the Labor Department confirmed…
View original post 371 more words
All this “hate” is 100% the result of Obama and Holder and their policies. Both of them will burn in hell for what they have done to the country and the African Americans that were duped into this growing travesty. And the sad things is Obama could stop this anytime he wanted to!
Graham, Christie, Perry, Pataki, Santorum and kasich should drop out and narrow the field down to under 10 and see where the number go. What I would like to see is the race narrowed down to Trump, Carson, Cruz, Fiorina, Rubio and Walker.
Very interesting analysis, I would add that the RNC does not want to win the presidency other wise why run a weak candidate. One could make a case that the DNC and The RNC are working together to maintain a divided government so the changes that have made ca not be reversed. Running Bush makes it likely the conservatives will not vote and that means the weak DNC candidate Hillary might win.
The Republicans had a little focus group who watched taped instances on a television of Trump’s apparent misogyny, political flip flops and awe-inspiring braggadocio. They watched the Donald say Rosie O’Donnell has a “fat, ugly face.” They saw that Trump once supported a single-payer health system, and they heard him say, “I will be the greatest jobs president God ever created.” But the group—which included 23 white people, 3 African-Americans and three Hispanics and consisted of a plurality of college-educated, financially comfortably Donald devotees—was undeterred.
At the end of the session, the vast majority said they liked Trump more than when they walked in. The people conducting this experiment were stunned. The Republican leadership is clueless because they are part of the group the people hate so much.
Let’s be honest. If Hillary or Bush are elected, does anyone really think anything will change? After Obama promising to change everything and endorsing whatever the bureaucracy wanted to maintain, getting real change is hopeless. I have personally been talking to a lot of people on the street to gauge their response. Trump is bringing in so many new people who have never voted, this is unfolding precisely as our computer has been forecasting for decades. The 2016 election will be (1) a huge backlash again the politics as usual, and (2) we should see a rise in voter turnout. This is very interesting.
Honestly, at least a vote for Trump may be the only way to to put the breaks on this whole move toward electronic money and higher taxes that will destroy the world. Party politicians will always sell the people out to save the establishment.
Rush has it 100% right, after 2010 and 2014 and no change I realized the Republican party had lost its soul! I am a life long republican and the only way I would every vote republican again is if Trump got the nomination.
I listened to both of these videos by trump. If after watching them you still don’t understand why he can win then there is no hope for you.