Book Review Sovereign Duty


Sovereign duty is a book on the U.S. Constitution written and published by by KrisAnne Hall, J.D. in 2014 and edited by Steve Andrews. The book can be found on KrisAnne’s website Liberty First. From the Introduction of this book we have …

The gift of Liberty was purchased for us with great sacrifice. The men and women at our founding understood that Liberty is a gift from Goad and that all Gods’ gifts are worth our every effort.  John Adams, in a letter to his wife Abigail in 1777, reminds us of the charge we have to ensure that the gift of Liberty is not squandered.

“Posterity! you will never know how much it cost the present generation to preserve your freedom! I hope you will make a good use of it. If you do not, i shall repent in Heaven that I ever took half the pains to preserve it.”

The book is written in three parts; Part One – More Lenient Measure, Part Two – Ultimate Solutions and Part Three – Hope for the Future. In this book KirsAnne relates to us the meaning of freedom and what it means to us and how we, in out present ignorance, do not understand how our freedom is being taken away from us.  A key part of this work which we are not taught today is that the American States are Sovereign and that they created the federal government by compact — in short the States made the to protect them from outside threats and when they did that they put limits on their power. What this means is that the Federal Government that we knows is not or does not hold the Sovereign which means they have no legal authority to make laws outside the limits imposed on them.

Think of it this way if you make a contract with someone to do a task for you — what would you think of that party then started doing things that were not in that contract like removing all you funds from your bank account.  Absurd, of course, but since the Federal Government is nothing more than an an entity created by the States how can it then dictate to those that created it what they can or can not do?

I highly recommend that anyone that is interested in the Constitution and Freedom read the book.

Politics: Good point by Laura Ingraham: It’s risky for the GOP to bank everything on ObamaCare


Well we will see how he feels when he turns 75 in 18 years!

deacon303's avatarWhiskey Tango Foxtrot

Politics: Good point by Laura Ingraham: It’s risky for the GOP to bank everything on ObamaCare | Best of Cain.

I must say, one of the biggest perils, I believe, is the notoriously short memory of the American public. If it doesn’t happen within two months of an election, it disappears into history. There are, obviously, exceptions to that rule, but it seems to me that, in general, the public has a very short attention span and even shorter memory. They will need a lot more than the failures of Obamacare, especially with November being so far away, and they need a non-annoying way of reminding the public over and over again that things have been pretty damn bad. You can bet the promises spewed by the Democrats of more “free” stuff will blank a lot of folks to how many lies have been told, how many scandals there have…

View original post 58 more words

Our Pathetic President


I just pray that the damage this man has done can be reversed after he is out of office and a republican elected to replace him.

PA Pundits - International's avatarPA Pundits International

caruba_alan20080111By Alan Caruba ~

Obama - Nothing is My FaultThe first thing you need to keep in mind is that Syria and Iraq are now just lines on a map at this point. They don’t exist as national states because the former is locked in a civil war that will replace its dictator one way or the other and the latter’s alleged government is deeply divided between the usual schism of Sunni and Shiite.

More to the point, Iraq’s government is led by men who are the friends and pawns of Iran. In a recent issue of the Iranian newspaper, Eternad, an Iranian analyst commented on the new Iraqi cabinet noting that its new prime minister “enjoys Iran’s support and spend his formative years in Iran, and continued (the operation of the Islamic al-Dawa party) until the fall of Saddam Hussein’s regime.”

That fall was the result of the war waged against Saddam by President…

View original post 769 more words

REPORT: US SPENT $22 TRILLION ON FAILED ‘WAR ON POVERTY’


We just need to spend a little bit more and it will be all taken care of … lol

Liberated Women And The Traditional Family


Sadly this was all planned as the way to replay the republic was a power central Federal government. And that is what we now have as there is almost nothing in the citizens life’s that the feds don’t have a say in now!

PA Pundits - International's avatarPA Pundits International

caruba_alan20080111By Alan Caruba ~

AA - Feminism-these-daysMy generation, born in the late 1930s and the 1940s, has witnessed a dramatic change in the role and the rights of women in America. A significant result of the women’s liberation movement is a change in the role of traditional marriage that was reported in early September.

“If you count a generation as spanning 20 years,” wrote Terence P. Jeffery, an editor of CNSnews.com, “then approximately 36 percent of the American generation born from 1993 through 2012—which has begun turning 21 this year and will continue turning 21 through 2033—were born to unmarried mothers.”

By comparison, Jeffrey noted that “Back in 1940, only 3.8 percent of American babies were born to unmarried mothers. By 1960, it was still only 5.3 percent.” There was a time when being a single mother was regarded as a reflection of the woman’s moral values. How a society deals…

View original post 809 more words

Political Correctness is Tyranny With Manners


Not all entertainers were jerks and there are still a few today that get it!

deacon303's avatarWhiskey Tango Foxtrot

Political correctness is tyranny with manners. - Charlton Heston Political correctness is tyranny with manners. – Charlton Heston

View original post

Salon tool: ‘Nothing scares a white American more than someone who isn’t a white American’


I’m an old white dude and ex military (Nam) and nothing scares me more than a Marxists or a Progressive race is ill-relevant, I have many non white brothers that I served with .

HILLARY CLINTON: QUEEN OF DECEIT


You got that right …

A. L. Luttrell's avatarARLIN REPORT...................walking this path together

Featured Image -- 548

The drama queen will be running for president in 2016, everyone knows it, she knows, we know.   Hillary likes drama, plenty follows her where ever she goes.

The early campaign slogan is “Ready for Hillary”.   I have read blogs saying “I am ready for a lady prez”.  Really…..lets vote Hillary in for president because she is a woman?   I don’t have an issue voting for a lady as president, just not Hillary, she is no “Lady”.

Another comment read recently, “Another reason I would vote for Hillary as president is, she knows how things work in the White House.”   Exactly why I do not want Hillary as my president.   The way things are getting done, the controversy and scandals that have followed Hillary during her career, why would we even consider putting her in the highest office?

One word describes Hillary R. Clinton:  DECEIT

View original post

Now Entire ISIS Opposition Command Mysteriously Blown Up in ‘Unexplained’ Explosion


This may not be 100% true but there is enough here to cause concern; since we do know that this administration does not have our best interest at heart!!

Bombing Was ‘Not Act of Terrorism’ -Boston Marathon Victims Denied Insurance Reimbursement


Crooked politicians and attorneys, but then I repeat myself, always find ways to make us think one thing but really means something else. Like having insurance that doesn’t really cover anything because of the “fine” print.

deacon303's avatarWhiskey Tango Foxtrot

Were you under the assumption that the Boston Marathon bombings were an act of terrorism? Maybe it was because just after the bombings, the President said this:

“Any time bombs are used to target innocent civilians it is an act of terror.”

Turns out, if you look into the details, he actually never said it was an act of terrorism. There was much discussion about the whys and wherefores after his statement, and the mincing of the difference between the words “terror” and “terrorism” went on for quite some time.

Now, the Treasury Department has given its imprint on the perspective as well. And they haven’t “certified” it as an “act of terrorism,” either.

The context is the Terrorism Risk Insurance Act, which was passed just after the 9/11 attacks. It’s a federally-administered and underwritten insurance program for terrorism-caused damage, designed to be relatively inexpensive but to compensate policy owners…

View original post 254 more words