Showcasing the severe political resistance objectives of Democrats, speaker of the House Nancy Pelosi has sent a politically crafted letterto the White House requesting that President Trump cancel his State of the Union address.
The pretense of the letter surrounds the ongoing partial government shutdown and a concern for security. However, DHS and the Secret Service have stated nothing in the letter is factually correct; and they were not contactedby Pelosi with questions.
In short, it’s a political stunt by Speaker Pelosi and Democrat leadership.
The creep vibe on this interview with U.S. Democrat Senator Mark Warner is off-the-charts. The only thing more disturbing than the background possibility of three teenage boys tied up in his basement is the structural way he can blatantly lie to the camera; and how the perpetually furrowed brow of Jake Tapper doesn’t call him out on it.
Warner begins by saying: “I’m not going to to talk about what we may have been briefed in the gang-of-eight when these investigations opened.” Well, um, duh. You see, as Warner continued: “that throughout that whole summer [of 2016]”etc…. senator Mark Warner wasn’t a gang-of-eight member.
Senator Mark Warner didn’t become a Go8 member until Senator Dianne Feinstein abdicated her Senate Intelligence Chair position in January 2017. Kinda hard to talk about briefings he never participated in…. It’s all made up from there. Watch:
.
The gang of eight in 2015 and 2016 was: Devin Nunes, Adam Schiff, Paul Ryan, Nancy Pelosi, Mitch McConnell, Harry Reid, Richard Burr and Dianne Feinstein.
I think even the perpetually perplexed Tapper knew Warner was talking from inside the manufactured rabbit hole because furrowed-brow followed up with questions about the counterintelligence origination [July 2016] he knew Warner was not a part of.
Warner is the chief weasel inside the famously corrupt Senate Select Committee on Intelligence (SSCI); and it is almost a certainty the DOJ and FBI previously covered up for his direct involvement with the James Wolfe leaks to the media.
Don’t forget this is the same Mark Warner who was attempting to organize covert meetings (without a paper trail) with Christopher Steele in 2017.
Notice how comfortably familiar pink shirt Warner is with childish text lingo?… If this person lived in your neighborhood, he’d be the person everyone would warn their kids to avoid.
I”ll bet the DC black files on Senator Warner are very thick.
Against the backdrop of a New York Times article attempting to justify the FBI opening a counterintelligence operation against Donald Trump the current narrative du-jour is to claim the investigation was considered as an outcome of the firing of James Comey in 2017. This is factually false.
FBI Director James Comey outlined the specifics of when the counterintelligence operation began during his March 20, 2017 testimony. Pay close attention. FBI Director James Comey -together with NSA head Admiral Mike Rogers- testified to congress specifically about the timing and notification (first three minutes of the video):
Rep. Stefanik: [01:12] …”when did you notify the White House, the DNI or congressional leadership”?
James Comey: …”good question. Congressional leadership, sometime recently they were briefed on the nature of the investigation, as I said. Obviously the department of justice has been aware of it all along”…
Watch the first 3 minutes of that video. Notice the discomfort etc. We have previously outlined why THAT is such a big deal –SEE HERE– Comey is discussing the notification to congress that took place approximately a week earlier. Prior to that congressional notification FBI Director Comey admits to keeping congress in the dark “because of the sensitivity of the matter” from July 2016 through March 2017.
The issue of the counterintelligence timing becomes an even bigger deal when contrast with the recently exposed testimony from FBI attorney Lisa Page. Pay attention to Lisa Page and then contrast it against CIA Director Brennan’s testimony:
Unidentified Representative: “We have documents that would suggest that in that briefing the dossier was mentioned to Harry Reid and then, obviously, we’re going to have to have conversations. Does that surprise you that Director Brennan would be aware [of the dossier]?”
Page: “Yes, sir. Because with all due honesty, if Director Brennan—so we got that information from our source, right? The FBI got this information from our source. If the CIA had another source of that information, I am neither aware of that nor did the CIA provide it to us if they did, because the first time we—”
Rep.: “We do know there are multiple sources.”
Page: “I do know that. I do know that the information ultimately found its way lots of different places, certainly in October of 2016. But if the CIA as early as August, in fact, had those same reports, I am not aware of—I’m not aware of that and nor do I believe they provided them to us, and that would be unusual.”
…
Rep: “What you’re saying is when the [CIA] director briefed the White House 2 days prior to that, on August the 8th, or prepared for it, actually briefed him on the 10th, that it had nothing to do with any campaign. Even though George Toscas and Stu Evans knew about it.”
PAGE: “Sir, I would be shocked. I would truly be stunned to discover that the [CIA] director had briefed the president on the substance of our investigation or even the existence of our investigation. I would be—I can’t say it didn’t happen, I wasn’t there, but I would be stunned to discover that.” (link)
Now take a look at what CIA Director John Brennan previously stated. Pay very close attention to the segment at 13:35 of this video of Brennan’s testimony:
Brennan: [13:35] “Third, through the so-called Gang-of-Eight process we kept congress apprised of these issues as we identified them.”
“Again, in consultation with the White House, I PERSONALLY briefed the full details of our understanding of Russian attempts to interfere in the election to congressional leadership; specifically: Senators Harry Reid, Mitch McConnell, Dianne Feinstein and Richard Burr; and to representatives Paul Ryan, Nancy Pelosi, Devin Nunes and Adam Schiff between 11th August and 6th September [2016], I provided the same briefing to each of the gang of eight members.”
“Given the highly sensitive nature of what was an active counter-intelligence case [that means the FBI], involving an ongoing Russian effort, to interfere in our presidential election, the full details of what we knew at the time were shared only with those members of congress; each of whom was accompanied by one senior staff member.”…
Brennan goes on to say the main substance of those Go8 meetings was the same as the main judgements of the January 2017 classified and unclassified intelligence assessments published by the CIA, FBI, DNI and NSA (intelligence community).
That January reference was the infamous 17 agencies report, from CIA (Brennan), DNI (Clapper), FBI (Comey) and NSA (Rogers), all who had confidence, according to the report, that Russia was attempting to interfere in the 2016 election.
Now, a critic might think that Brennan is informing congress on one thing, and Comey is NOT INFORMING congress on another. However, that angle is rebuked by Brennan’s own testimony that his specific intelligence product (CIA) was given to the FBI who were exclusively in charge of the “counter-intelligence investigation“.
We tackled this contraction last year. Dan encapsulated it nicely in this paragraph:
[…] Brennan gave Comey the investigative product -which had nothing to do with the Trump team- and Comey used it to carry out Obama, Hillary, and Susan Rice’s dirty work for them. Of course Brennan was in on the whole thing and is now saving his own skin by saying ” I briefed ya’ll on everything I had with regards to Russia, anything additional that arose please talk to my buddy Comey”.
Within his testimony Brennan was making Comey own the “Counter-Intelligence ‘Muh Russia’” claims about the Trump campaign. Brennan trying to make Comey the fall-guy for a Robert Mueller investigative outcome. Brennan knows there’s no ‘there’ there.
John Brennan realized someone has focused attention on Comey’s admission to congress that the FBI intentionally kept congress in the dark during the construct of the counter-intel narrative. Congress was kept in the dark during this phase because the narrative can only thrive with innuendo, rumor, gossip etc. The appearance of the investigation itself was the political need; the substance was non-existent and immaterial to the creation of the narrative.
If Comey notified congress, via the Gang of Eight oversight, the counter-intel narrative would have been harder to manufacture as details would have to be consistent. That’s the benefit to keeping any oversight away while creating the politically useful narrative.
John Brennan, facing the looming certainty of the underlying Russian ‘collusion evidence’ being non-existent, in 2017 was trying to give the appearance that he briefed congress on larger Russian election interference issues. However , the trouble for Brennan is his own admission that these issues were the underlying principle for the FBI counter-intelligence investigation. Brennan specifically says he gave his intelligence product to the FBI.
Additionally, “Brennan put some of the dossier material into the PDB [presidential daily briefing] for Obama and described it as coming from a ‘credible source,’ which is how they viewed Steele,” … “But they never corroborated his sources.” (link)
The material within Obama’s PDB, placed by Brennan, is what initially set off alarm bells for Devin Nunes (early 2017) because the material underlying the PDB intelligence product was unmasked by Obama’s National Security Adviser Susan Rice.
This was the unmasking information that Susan Rice later attempted to clarify:
Susan Rice @00:51 – …”Let me explain how this works. I was a National Security Adviser, my job is to protect the American people and the security of our country. That’s the same as the Secretary of State, Secretary of Defense and CIA Director.; and every morning, to enable us to do that, we receive – from the intelligence community – a compilation of intelligence reports that the IC, the intelligence community, has selected for us –on a daily basis– to give us the best information as to what’s going on around the world.”
[Note, Susan Rice is describing the PDB]
“I received those reports, as did other officials, and there were occasions when I would receive a report in which, uh, a ‘U.S Person’ was referred to. Name, uh, not provided, just ‘U.S. Person’.
And sometimes in that context, in order to understand the importance in the report – and assess it’s significance, it was necessary to find out or request, who that U.S. official was.”
The interview goes much further. There was a lot of news in that interview. There is also a tremendous amount of double-speak and self-contradiction; in some cases between sentences that follow each other.
Notice how Susan Rice contradicts herself about what the intelligence community puts into the PDB. Remember, Rice considers the PDB intel community to be very specific: James Clapper (DNI), John Brennan (CIA) and Defense Department (which would be the Pentagon and NSA Mike Rogers). And she states they would never send the President innocuous things unworthy of review.
However, right there Susan Rice is confirming the “unmasking” request(s) which can be pinned upon her, are directly related to her need to understand -on behalf of President Obama- intelligence for the President’s Daily Briefing (the PDB). This was a previous question now answered.
This is EXPLOSIVE, and here’s why.
Remember, the President’s Daily Brief under President Obama went to almost everyone at top levels in his administration. Regarding the Obama PDB:
[…] But while through most of its history the document has been marked “For the President’s Eyes Only,” the PDB has never gone to the president alone. The most restricted dissemination was in the early 1970s, when the book went only to President Richard Nixon and Henry Kissinger, who was dual-hatted as national security adviser and secretary of state.
In other administrations, the circle of readers has also included the vice president, the secretary of defense and the chairman of the Joint Chiefs of Staff, along with additional White House staffers.
By 2013, Obama’s PDB was making its way to more than 30 recipients, including the president’s top strategic communications aide and speechwriter, and deputy secretaries of national security departments. (link)
♦Sequence. Unbeknownst to the FBI (per testimony from Lisa Page), CIA Director John Brennan was briefing the Gang of Eight [Aug 11th => Sept 6th (2016)] on the Steele Dossier. Brennan was also placing the briefing in Obama’s PDB, and the targets of the dossier, now inside the PDB, were unmasked by Susan Rice.
So the question now becomes: In addition to candidate Donald Trump, who were the targets within the Obama PDB material (placed by Brennan and unmasked by Rice)?
Suspicious cat sparks are flying as Maria Bartiromo questions Connecticut Democrat Rep. Jim Himes about the intents and purposes of the House Permanent Select Committee on Intelligence (HPSCI) in the upcoming investigative sessions.
HPSCI Chairman Adam Schiff is closely coordinating with Speaker Nancy Pelosi, White House Oversight Chairman Elijah Cummings and Judiciary Chairman Jerry Nadler on the pre-established impeachment road map.
Preliminary oversight subpoenas and witness testimony kicks-off immediately after the Superbowl with a February 7th hearing for Michael Cohen and Lanny Davis.
Andrew McCarthy has a great common sense Op-Ed written today [SEE HERE]. One of the key points McCarthy makes is akin to a bull licking a NYT journalist on the face.
The NYT wrote their article about the FBI opening an investigation on President Trump ‘as if‘ that was some big revelation; however, McCarthy points out the FBI believed the Steele Dossier and used it as evidence in their FISA applications. The Steele Dossier was only about Donald Trump, no-one else. The fact that the FBI would believe and use the Steele Dossier is proof alone their investigation was always and only about Donald Trump.
I have previously written that all wars have been started by the Democrats with the single exception of the Iraq War under Dick Cheney and the Neocons. Now after Trump has pulled out of Syria, the Neocons are meeting with the Democrats to retake the White House and restore the effort to bring World War III to the Middle East. This is by no means something I care to have to write about. But there is a very dark cloud rising and all the people who hate Trump so much are clueless that he is actually trying to prevent these people from creating war. The hatred they are spreading about Russia is a deliberate attempt to paint them as evil to gain support for a war.
One of the leading Neocons is Bill Kristol. I have previously written that back in 1976, Bill Kristol worked for Democrat Daniel Patrick Moynihan’s United States Senate campaign. Later, in 1988, Kristol was the campaign manager for black Republican Alan Keyes’s unsuccessful Maryland Senatorial campaign against Paul Sarbanes. So Kristol was on both sides of the aisle.
It was the Neocon Kristol wrote the War Over Iraq: Saddam’s Tyranny And America’s Mission with his co-author Lawrence F. Kaplan, which was published on February 1st, 2003, one month and change BEFORE the invasion to support Cheney. Today, Kristol is very much anti-Trump. He is a true Neocon and wants to see conservatives challenge Trump for the 2020 nomination. He argues that the conservatives/Neocons need to seize control to reestablish the economic, national security and his brand of moral principles to take over the Republican Party. Kristol argues that Trump’s support among the rank and file will diminish over time and they are really too stupid to know what is best for the country.
The British Magazine, the Economist, call Kristol and crew the Never Trumpers. These Never Trumpers, claim to be Republicans but are really Neocons who have no problem watching your children die for their political experiments. They are Trump’s critics from within the Republican Party and are vocal to advocate war after Trump pulled out of Syria. This group of critics is led by conservative pundits such as Max Boot, David Brooks, Bill Kristol, David Frum, and George Will. That may appear to be few in number, but they are only the tip of the iceberg.
If you pick up the rug to look at the dirt hidden below, you will find also Lindsey Graham and Hillary Clinton. Both are the most reliable warmongers. Thank God John McCain is dead, he would have invaded Canada if you could argue there was one terrorist lurking somewhere enjoying the skying. Hillary, you might recall, repeatedly criticized Obama being too soft on military options. Both have come out and condemned Trump’s decision to withdraw from Syria using the Terrorist Card as always.
Americans, in general, have been historically isolationists. The Europeans who fled to America were adamantly against both World War I and World War II. Roosevelt had to go to Boston and lied to the people there to get support for sending arms to Britain. He swore no troops would EVER be sent to Europe. Most were Irish there who were insulted by the idea that their boys would go back and defend the British after what they did to Ireland. It has always been the politicians who have lied about each and every war to get involved from Johnson admitting the Vietnamese never fired on Americans at Tokin Gulf to weapons of mass destruction.
The Neocons actually delude themselves thinking they can create democracies in the Middle East by force and this will end all wars. It is kind of like Napoleon who also claimed he could end all wars by conquering everything. This is the same nonsense behind the EU – eliminate the sovereignty of all member nations in Europe and then one government in Brussels will end all wars.
Nevertheless, their policy to justify war is always the same – this will be the war to end all wars.
“God governs in the affairs of man. And if a sparrow cannot fall to the ground without his notice, is it probable that an empire can rise without his aid? We have been assured in the Sacred Writings that except the Lord build the house, they labor in vain that build it. I firmly believe this. I also believe that, without his concurring aid, we shall succeed in this political building no better than the builders of Babel.” Benjamin Franklin-Constitutional Convention of 1787
If God is not sovereign over the land and its people, then the land and its people become cut off from their Creator. Without God, a God-centered view turns into a self-centered view. Divine purpose turns into no purpose resulting in a lost people without moral compass and self- discipline. In Obama World, what once was celebrated is now condemned; once reviled, now worshipped, a culture grown carnal, materialistic, coarse, vulgar and self-indulgent. America, once the beacon of light for the entire world to see, is now a beacon of darkness and evil, a government that prefers shadows and the dark because their work is evil, a government that repels light because their corruption would be exposed.
One of the classic Biblical signs of a nation under judgment is a warning, when its hedge of protection has been lifted, its borders and national security breached. 9/11 was America’s wake-up call, a prophetic manifestation of such a warning.That warning should have prompted Americans to repent their sins, experience a spiritual revival, and return to God, but instead the “Isaiah 9:10 Effect” took place, a prideful arrogant national apostasy that Jewish prophet and author Jonathan Cahn outlines in his brilliant book “The Harbinger.”
Cahn’s most recent book “The Mystery of the Shemitah,” unlocks more keys to Americas future judgement and the calamities leading up to it. Cahn explains how the Bible reveals a clear pattern before judgement and attempts to warn through; visions, audible voices, prophetic utterances, signs, the written word, prophetic acts, supernatural occurrences and the outworking of natural events. Cahn’s Biblical facts reveal shocking evidence of Gods warning and judgment on America during the Shemitah years.
What is the Shemitah? The Israelites were commanded to keep the seventh day holy; separate and distinct from the other days of the week. On the Sabbath all regular work and worldly endeavors were to cease because it was a day to rest and be solely devoted to the Lord. What is not well known is that every seventh year was a Sabbath ‘year’ (Leviticus 25: 1-4) It was to be a holy year specially devoted to the Lord. All sowing and reaping, all plowing and planting, all gathering and harvesting had to cease by the end of the sixth year. “Six years you shall sow your land and gather its produce, but the seventh year you shall let it rest and lie fallow” (Exodus 23: 10-11) The Sabbath year was not only a designated time for the people to rest, it was a time for the land to rest and let the poor and animals partake of its bounty. In the Hebrew civil calendar the very last climatic day of the Shemitah year is Elul 29. It is when sweeping transformations always took place in the nations financial realm, when all credit and debt was wiped clean. (Deuteronomy 15:1-2) It was Israels day of financial nullification and remission, a massive cleansing of the economic and financial state, also called the Lord’s release.
The Shemitah year has always been a reminder that God is the source of all blessings, spiritual and otherwise, the Lord’s antidote to wipe away material attachments and humble the pride of his people.The Shemitah can also be a year of Gods judgement, the first occurring in 586 B.C. (Lamentation 1: 1-5) The city was Jerusalem, the kingdom Judah, the prophet Jeremiah. Jeremiah had tried to warn the people to repent or for seventy years the nation would be under the dominion of Babylon and at the end of that time the Lord would cause Babylon to fall. What does seventy years have to do with judgement? The answer is found in (Leviticus 26:31-35) The “sabbaths of the land” referred in the passage are the Sabbath years! If Israel would keep the Shemitah, God would keep and bless Israel with all that was needed and beyond, but to break and reject God’s covenant, the Shemitah would signify the opposite! There were seventy years when the Shemitah was not observed, so their judgement would last seventy years!
If God is rejected and not sovereign over the land and its people, then the land and its people become cut off from the Creator! The people of Israel drove God out of their lives to become their own gods, masters of the land, their world, and their destiny. They rewrote the law and redefined what was right and wrong, moral or immoral! Not only did they do whatever they wanted with their lives and with each other, their children were lifted up as sacrifices on the altars of foreign gods. The ultimate sin of offering their sons and daughters to the fires of Baal and Molech brought about Gods judgement and the nations mass destruction.The Israelites had driven the Shemitah from the land, now the Shemitah would remove their blessings and destroy them.
How does the Shemitah relate to modern America? Financial terms are very much like agricultural terms; financial investment is called sowing, funding called seed money, the start of a new enterprise called planting, investment returns called the yield, yield is fruition when one reaps the yield and the Hebrew word for fruit and produce is Tebuah, which also means gain, income and revenue! The Shemitah year can and has resulted in numerous economic crashes!
America was established by God, consecrated to his glory and as a result was richly blessed with peace, prosperity, and protection for many years. But, national apostasy has replaced God’s grace and mercy with calamity and disfavor. Millions of unborn children have been lifted to the altars of Baal and Christians who refuse to abide by the evil are being mocked, vilified and persecuted! Cahn describes how disobedience to God has led to not only Americas past financial crashes, but the toppling of the twin towers, and in all probability will result in the toppling of the American empire! He relates to the reader how towers rise high from their foundations and how the Shemitah brings them back to their foundations. America is now in the year of the Shemitah and its climatic last day, God’s day of remission, will take place on Sunday, September 13th, 2015. It is noteworthy to know that the last day the stock market will be
open the last week of the Shemitah year is Friday, September 11th!
To add to the complexity of the 2015 Shemitah year, two solar eclipses will take place. On March 20th, a solar eclipse will mark the exact halfway point of the Shemitah, and falls on Nisan 1 which is a sign of judgement.The other solar eclipse will mark the last day of the Shemitahs peak and culmination, the remission day of the ‘Year of Remission!”
Luke 12:48 says, “to whom much is given, from him much will be required.” America’s covenant with God has been abused and judgement is coming. In Hebrew, the word for safety is Yeshua and translated in English it means there is no safety outside of Jesus!
God’s words to Ezekiel were, “If the watchman sees the danger coming and does not sound the alarm to warn the people, their blood will be upon his head.” Several months before the Ferguson, Missouri riots took place, I had a clear vision of a black wooden hearse-like carriage drawn by a team of magnificent black horses, their manes fiercely blowing in the wind. Below the hearse was a sign that said MISSOURI. Is it possible that my vision was another warning that judgement is near? Why did I choose to read “The Mystery of the Shemitah last week, my last chapter read this past Sunday when the scriptural message in church the same day was about the Shemitah? The reading, 2Chronicles 36 15-22, says in part;
“The Lord, the God of their fathers, sent word to them through his messengers again and again, because he had pity on his people and on his dwelling place. But they mocked God’s messengers; despised his words and scoffed at his prophets until the wrath of the Lord was aroused against his people and there was no remedy.” After much destruction of property, finances and life, the land lay in desolation “until the seventy years were completed in fulfillment of the word of the Lord spoken by Jeremiah.”
The other message on Sunday was equally as important: John 14:26; “When the Counselor’s comes, whom I will send to you from the Father, the Spirit of truth who goes out from the Father, he will testify about me. And you also must testify, for you have been with me from the beginning.”
Are we ready to testify?
Give me ears to listen….give me eyes to see, give me words to speak and show your face to me.
I have created this site to help people have fun in the kitchen. I write about enjoying life both in and out of my kitchen. Life is short! Make the most of it and enjoy!
This is a library of News Events not reported by the Main Stream Media documenting & connecting the dots on How the Obama Marxist Liberal agenda is destroying America
Showcasing the severe political resistance objectives of Democrats, speaker of the House Nancy Pelosi has sent a politically crafted letterto the White House requesting that President Trump cancel his State of the Union address.
I have previously written that all wars have been started by the Democrats with the single exception of the 
Centinel2012 