Elitists Are on Record for 95% of the Population to be Eliminated


What is talked about here is the underlining purpose of UN Agenda 21, and sustainability. The process is to gain control of all of the worlds population through any means and eliminate all but 500 million to maybe on the outside 1 billion people. This is fact as can be derived by reading between the lines of just about everything that is published even the IPCC climate projections are really projects based on the number of people. The elitists fear the people not the CO2.

It’s Not Fearmongering or a Conspiracy Theory when Elitists Are on Record for 95% of the Population to be Eliminated

Re-Posted from Freedom Outpost Dean Garrison August 9, 2014

“If I were reincarnated I would wish to be returned to earth as a killer virus to lower human population levels.” -Prince Phillip, Duke of Edinburgh, leader of the World Wildlife Fund

Recently, we have posted a couple of articles at D.C. Clothesline that question the narrative of the current Ebola outbreak. D.C. Clothesline is not just a news site but a site that explores the world of conspiracy and embraces the truth movement.

The problem with looking at conspiracies is that often times, people immediately disregard them. You can tell people things like, “please just look at this video,” or “please just read this article,” and it really does not matter.

People are busy and your conspiracy is not their main priority. If they are not busy they are simply just too lazy or closed-minded.

So today, rather than tell you why you should believe anything about a possible Ebola conspiracy, I just want to show you some quotes from very famous people both past and present. If the words of these people do not prove to you that the elite of the world are looking for a way to reduce our population, then nothing likely will.

Before you can believe that Ebola, or any other virus, might be used in such a way, you must first understand that there are lots of people out there who would like to see billions of the world’s inhabitants dead.

Ever heard of a guy named Bill Gates?

Bill Gates is what many call a eugenicist, but he is not alone and is surrounded by lots of famous people and organizations worldwide:

“Since its inception, the U.N. has advanced a world-wide program of population control, scientific human breeding, and Darwinism.” -Claire Chambers, The SIECUS Circle: A Humanist Revolution.

“The present vast overpopulation, now far beyond the world carrying capacity, cannot be answered by future reductions in the birth rate due to contraception, sterilization and abortion, but must be met in the present by the reduction of numbers presently existing. This must be done by whatever means necessary.” -Eco-92 Earth Charter

“The United Nation’s goal is to reduce population selectively by encouraging abortion, forced sterilization, and control of human reproduction, and regards two-thirds of the human population as excess baggage, with 350,000 people to be eliminated per day.” -Jacques Cousteau

“Childbearing [should be] a punishable crime against society, unless the parents hold a government license … All potential parents [should be] required to use contraceptive chemicals, the government issuing antidotes to citizens chosen for childbearing.” -David Brower, Executive Director of The Sierra Club

“If radical environmentalists were to invent a disease to bring human populations back to sanity, it would probably be something like AIDS. It has the potential to end industrialism, which is the main force behind the environmental crises.” -Earth First!

“At present the population of the world is increasing at about 58,000 per diem. War, so far, has had no very great effect on this increase, which continued throughout each of the world wars… War has hitherto been disappointing in this respect, but perhaps bacteriological war may prove effective.

If a Black Death could spread throughout the world once in every generation, survivors could procreate freely without making the world too full. The state of affairs might be unpleasant, but what of it?” -Bertrand Russell, The Impact of Science on Society

“A total population of 250-300 million people, a 95% decline from present levels, would be ideal.” -Ted Turner, CNN founder and supporter of UN

“There are many ways to make the death rate increase.” -Robert McNamara, New Solidarity, March 30, 1981

Meet John Holdren, Barack Obama’s Science Advisor

If you don’t think this administration is in favor of population control, then maybe Holdren’s words will convince you.

“Indeed, it has been concluded that compulsory population-control laws, even including laws requiring compulsory abortion, could be sustained under the existing Constitution if the population crisis became sufficiently severe to endanger the society.” -John P. Holdren, Obama’s science advisor, Ecoscience 1977.

“One way to carry out this disapproval might be to insist that all illegitimate babies be put up for adoption—especially those born to minors, who generally are not capable of caring properly for a child alone. If a single mother really wished to keep her baby, she might be obliged to go through adoption proceedings and demonstrate her ability to support and care for it. Adoption proceedings probably should remain more difficult for single people than for married couples, in recognition of the relative difficulty of raising children alone. It would even be possible to require pregnant single women to marry or have abortions, perhaps as an alternative to placement for adoption, depending on the society.” -John P. Holdren, Obama’s science advisor, Ecoscience 1977.

“Adding a sterilant to drinking water or staple foods is a suggestion that seems to horrify people more than most proposals for involuntary fertility control.” -John P. Holdren, Obama’s science advisor, Ecoscience 1977.

“A program of sterilizing women after their second or third child, despite the relatively greater difficulty of the operation than vasectomy, might be easier to implement than trying to sterilize men.” -John P. Holdren, Obama’s science advisor, Ecoscience 1977.

“The development of a long-term sterilizing capsule that could be implanted under the skin and removed when pregnancy is desired opens additional possibilities for coercive fertility control. The capsule could be implanted at puberty and might be removable, with official permission, for a limited number of births.” -John P. Holdren, Obama’s science advisor, Ecoscience 1977.

“In today’s world, however, the number of children in a family is a matter of profound public concern. The law regulates other highly personal matters. For example, no one may lawfully have more than one spouse at a time. Why should the law not be able to prevent a person from having more than two children?” -John P. Holdren, Obama’s science advisor, Ecoscience 1977.

“Perhaps those agencies, combined with UNEP and the United Nations population agencies, might eventually be developed into a Planetary Regime—sort of an international superagency for population, resources, and environment. Such a comprehensive Planetary Regime could control the development, administration, conservation, and distribution of all natural resources, renewable or nonrenewable, at least insofar as international implications exist. Thus the Regime could have the power to control pollution not only in the atmosphere and oceans, but also in such freshwater bodies as rivers and lakes that cross international boundaries or that discharge into the oceans. The Regime might also be a logical central agency for regulating all international trade, perhaps including assistance from DCs to LDCs, and including all food on the international market.” -John P. Holdren, Obama’s science advisor, Ecoscience 1977.

“The Planetary Regime might be given responsibility for determining the optimum population for the world and for each region and for arbitrating various countries’ shares within their regional limits. Control of population size might remain the responsibility of each government, but the Regime would have some power to enforce the agreed limits.” -John P. Holdren, Obama’s science advisor, Ecoscience 1977.

“To date, there has been no serious attempt in Western countries to use laws to control excessive population growth, although there exists ample authority under which population growth could be regulated.” -John P. Holdren, Obama’s science advisor, Ecoscience 1977.

A few more from various sources:

“The resultant ideal sustainable population is hence more than 500 million but less than one billion.” -Club of Rome, Goals for Mankind

“In order to stabilize world population, we must eliminate 350,000 people per day. It is a horrible thing to say, but it is just as bad not to say it.” -Jacques Cousteau, 1991 explorer and UNESCO courier

“I believe that human overpopulation is the fundamental problem on Earth Today” [and] “We humans have become a disease, the Humanpox.” -Dave Foreman, Sierra Club, co-founder of Earth First!

“We don’t want the word to go out that we want to exterminate the Negro population.” -Margaret Sanger, Founder of Planned Parenthood

“MAINTAIN HUMANITY UNDER 500,000,000 IN PERPETUAL BALANCE WITH NATURE” -Anonymously commissioned Georgia Guidestones

“Society has no business to permit degenerates to reproduce their kind” -Theodore Roosevelt

“A total population of 250-300 million people, a 95% decline from present levels, would be ideal” -Ted Turner, founder of CNN.

“And advanced forms of biological warfare that can “target” specific genotypes may transform biological warfare from the realm of terror to a politically useful tool.” -The Project for a New American Century, Rebuilding America’s Defenses, p. 60, Dick Cheney and Paul Wolfowitz

“Whatever the price of the Chinese Revolution, it has obviously succeeded not only in producing more efficient and dedicated administration, but also in fostering high morale and community of purpose. The social experiment in China under Chairman Mao’s leadership is one of the most important and successful in human history.” -David Rockefeller, Banker, Honorary director of Council on Foreign Relations, honorary chairman of Bilderberg Group & founder of Trilateral Commission. Member of Bohemian Club, praising Chairman Mao, whose policies killed at least 30 million people.

“War and famine would not do. Instead, disease offered the most efficient and fastest way to kill the billions that must soon die if the population crisis is to be solved. AIDS is not an efficient killer because it is too slow. My favorite candidate for eliminating 90 percent of the world’s population is airborne Ebola (Ebola Reston), because it is both highly lethal and it kills in days, instead of years. “We’ve got airborne diseases with 90 percent mortality in humans. Killing humans. Think about that. “You know, the bird flu’s good, too. For everyone who survives, he will have to bury nine.” -Dr. Eric Pianka

If you throw these people and organizations into the mix, you might understand that there really are those who are evil enough to try to exterminate a large part of the world population.

Is that what Ebola is here for?

I don’t know. I am simply a truth seeker who likes to look at all angles.

But if you don’t realize that there really are people out there who want to exterminate 85% (or more) of the world’s population then you might not even bother to look. You might dismiss it all as conspiracy.

Agenda 21 is real. It is disguised in many clever ways such as women’s rights and environmental responsibility. In the end it is really about a bunch of elites who do not believe in God and have chosen to try to take His place. They think they know what is best for you. You belong to a subspecies. And most of that subspecies needs to be eliminated.

That is how these people think.

That is the truth and, just so you know, I could have listed hundreds more.

We really aren’t the crazed, conspiracy theorists that you might think, at least not all of us. Many of us, like myself, have just decided to do research that most are unwilling to do.

Source

Read more at http://freedomoutpost.com/2014/08/its-not-a-conspiracy-theory-when-elitists-are-on-record-for-95-of-the-population-to-be-eliminated/#IQ81itI253TuS2eD.99

The Obama file


Re-Posted from POWERLINE posted on August 11, 2014 by Scott Johnson

From the first days of his administration, President Obama has sought to befriend our enemies and betray our allies. Those of us who understood Obama as a member of the leftover left with friends in all the likely places have not been surprised. How could we find Obama taking in the Reverend Jeremiah Wright over all those years and not get a clue? As we see in his yammering to the apostle Thomas late last week, Obama is unrelenting in his views. The phenomenon is remarkable. It should not go without saying.

David Horowitz is a former member of the radical left who has long since gone into opposition. He issues a dispirited clarion call in the NRO column “Obama’s treachery and American silence.” David assesses the course of recent events to add to his longstanding indictment of Obama, and he doesn’t even get around to Iran.

He does get around to Benghazi, however, finding Obama’s behavior in the aftermath of the murder of our men in Benghazi to be “the most shameful individual act by a president in the history of the White House.” For more on Benghazi, see sundance’s post “The Benghazi brief.”

Ron Radosh is a former Communist who has moved on to become a serious historian and critic of the American left in several books including The Rosenberg File (written with Joyce Milton), his account of the Rosenberg spy case, and his memoir Commies: A Journey Through the Old Left, the New Left and the Leftover Left. In his PJ Media column “The American left: Friends of our country’s enemies,” Ron assesses Obama’s friends/critics on the leftover left in the context of current events. Even if they find Obama wanting, Obama’s heart is with them.

Obama’s pathetic excuse for not acting in Iraq


Re-Post from POWERLINE postedd on August 10, 2014 by Paul Mirengoff in Iraq

Why did President Obama stand by while ISIS conquered much of Iraq? The reason seems straightforward: he doesn’t believe in using force unless it’s part of an international effort.

Obama has offered a different explanation, though. He says he’s been unwilling to intervene because “there’s no American military solution to the larger crisis in Iraq.” “The only lasting solution,” he adds, “is reconciliation among Iraqi communities and stronger Iraqi security forces.”

Obama is referring to the fact that the Maliki government’s outrageous conduct alienated Sunnis (and others) to the point that many Sunnis thought ISIS might be preferable to continued rule by Baghdad. Thus, as Karen DeYoung of the Washington Post has reported, “the administration worried that interjecting itself into the conflict would inevitably open it to charges of siding with one side or the other in what has become an increasingly sectarian battle.”

In the same vein, Obama has let it be known that he will not permit the U.S. to serve as Maliki’s air force or, for that matter, the Kurds’.

I assume that this is all a pretext for Obama’s preference for inaction. If not, it reflects criminally bad thinking — the equivalent of refusing to help a fire department put out a deadly fire because the department is corrupt.

Had Obama moved to stop ISIS as it began its conquests in Iraq, he would not have sided with Maliki over Sunnis. The military action would have been directed against ISIS, not the Sunni population. ISIS is evil made manifest. The fact that some Sunnis are blind to this reality (or are okay with it) hardly justifies U.S. inaction.

If Obama declined to take military action because he just didn’t want to fight, that’s unfortunate and possibly tragic, but understandable. If he declined because he didn’t want to take sides in a battle between pure evil and a legitimate, though badly flawed, government, that’s reprehensible. Moral cowardice is much worse than the ordinary kind.

As for the president’s unwillingness to become “Maliki’s air force,” this sounds smart until one gives it a moment’s thought. In other words, it is vintage Obama.

Even Eric Holder and John Kerry acknowledge that ISIS poses a potential threat to America’s security. That being so, we can, in Obama’s terms, view Maliki’s forces and the Kurds as “America’s army.” Serving as “the air force” in joint operations against our sworn and deadly enemy, while others do the hard fighting, is a good deal for the U.S.

For more than five years, President Obama has made the U.S. both the army and the air force of Afghanistan, notwithstanding the massive shortcomings of Karzai and his government. ISIS is an even more dangerous force than the Taliban. Obama’s unwillingness to take it on, even from the air, was incoherent.

Obama claims that there can be no “lasting solution” in Iraq until the Iraqis achieve national reconciliation. But our concern right now shouldn’t be with a “lasting solution;” our concern should be with defeating ISIS.

A lasting solution based on national reconciliation is another way of describing “nation building.” How ironic that Obama professes the need for nation building in Iraq as a prerequisite for sustained U.S. air attacks on ISIS. This is a man who will use any excuse not to take on America’s enemies.

There was a time when national reconciliation seemed possible in Iraq. But once Obama disengaged, that moment passed, probably forever.

It may be that Iraq can patch together a national government less objectionable to Sunnis and other minorities than Maliki’s. But Obama concedes that winning over the Sunnis “is going to take some time” and cannot be accomplished “in weeks.”

How much more territory will ISIS capture in the meantime? How many more innocents will ISIS butcher?

And what excuse will Obama proffer for inaction if and when momentary “national reconciliation” is achieved?

CRS: Congress Added 439 New Crimes Between 2008 to 2013


At some point there is no more Free Society we all become criminals of one sort or another.

jonathanturley's avatarJONATHAN TURLEY

PrisonCellThe Congressional Research Service (CRS) has issued a report that informed Congress that it has created 439 new criminal offenses between 2008 and 2013. This staggering figure gives a glimpse into the rapid criminalization of America where there are, by some estimates, around 4,500 federal offenses alone and tens of thousands of more on the state and federal levels. Politicians continue to add crimes, which tend to be popular with voters and do not require immediate budget demands (though they add huge costs not just in enforcement but the costs of citizens themselves in being pulled into the criminal justice system).

View original post 147 more words

The Middle Class, Refugees in their Own Country


Very true and Obama doesn’t care he loves the Brotherhood!

FLIGHT CONTROL: Boeing’s ‘Uninterruptible Autopilot System’, Drones & Remote Hijacking


Now this is very interested and leaves much to be explained for either Boeing’s system doesn’t work or someone took control of the aircraft — NOT THE PILOTS!

Washington Post: Obama Doesn’t Have ‘License to Tear up the Constitution’


Not only doesn’t he have the license to tear it up but since he is trying to change it administratively that requires the congress to get ride of him!

Homeland Security ‘partnered with’ UN Migration Organization, Triggered Border Crisis


Re-posted from Dont Comply . Com

US protesters  block the arrival of immigrant detainees who were scheduled to be processed at the Murrieta Border Patrol station in California. - courtesy of NPR

Even the mainstream media can no longer ignore US Immigration and Customs Enforcement’s (ICE) refusal to follow or enforce federal law.

ICE and US Customs and Border Patrol (CBP) have become possibly the world’s largest human trafficking organization, using buses and commercial airlines to openly transport illegal aliens all over the United States; even as far away as Alaska, Hawaii and the Virgin Islands.

As far back as 2011 independent media and watchdog groups were issuing warnings about the reckless dereliction of duty by ICE that would result in a major crisis.

6/15/12 DHS Secretary Napolitano issues memo instructing DHS to refrain from deporting illegal aliens up to the age of 30 thereby circumventing congress by administratively enacting the "DREAM Act"

The Federation for American Immigration Reform (FAIR) highlighted the Morton Memos, issued by ICE Director John Morton, beginning in March 2011. These memos ordered changes in policy ensuring that ICE and CBP would be unable to perform according to their mandates.

In the October-November 2011 issue of Migration Policy Practice, the International Organization for Migration (IOM) announced that in March it had ‘partnered’ with the US Department of Homeland Security (DHS).

An IOM/DHS workshop, held around the same time as the first ‘Morton Memo’, planned how to best facilitate a mass migration of illegal immigrants into the United States, or as the IOM summarized it:

examined the balance between the need for agile and compassionate responses by immigration systems and the need to preserve the integrity of those systems. Among the key themes raised there were the importance of preparedness and pre-established immigration policies that can be quickly implemented as soon as an emergency occurs; the establishment of mechanisms for quickly identifying individuals in need of international protection; and the critical value of coordination for both the immediate and longer term migration response.” 

On July 18, 2014, the IOM posted this article on their website clearly claiming credit for facilitating the crisis:

IOM Stresses Need to Increase Assistance to Unaccompanied Children Traveling to the United States 

excerpt – “The ability of transit countries to deal with the situation is strained, and once in the U.S., the government’s capacity to properly receive and assist child migrants is equally stretched.

IOM, through its presence in all countries in the region, has considerable experience addressing these challenges.  Through information campaigns, IOM warns parents of the dangers of sending their children north with smugglers.  IOM also works with migrant children and families in shelters in transit countries and when returning home.” (emphasis mine)

DHS and IOM didn’t discuss maintaining border integrity or preventing illegal immigration because the IOM is a UN agency with the singular mission of facilitating ‘migration’ with no regard for national sovereignty.

Since this ‘partnership’ was unaccompanied by press releases, it passed unnoticed by the media and the American People.  So, in December of 2011 when Government Security News filed a report stating that DHS Secretary Napolitano had “directed ICE to develop a national-level mass migration plan” only a few independent media outlets even bothered mentioning it.

That announcement would be echoed in January 2014, when ICE posted a request on FedBizOpps.gov for Planning, Briefing, and Reporting Anlaysis for Emergency Response and Mass Migration Support <sic> only months before the historic influx of illegal immigrants into Texas.

The requests included:

There's something distinctly Orwellian about the Obama regime's exclusive use of the word 'stakeholders' instead of adjectives like citizen or state, except of course in public speeches intended for we proletarians. Used in this way, the word reeks of the 'reverse fascism' or 'inverted totalitarianism' that Obama so wholly embodies. [click for link]

 “Assist in coordination and collaboration with internal and external stakeholders to facilitate a “Whole Community” approach to comprehensive emergency preparedness facilitating the alignment of leadership guidance, organizational requirements, and equities.”

 “Provide support for program/project management, operations, coordination, planning, and policy support regarding all-hazard emergency/crisis management, preparedness, continuity of operations, and enterprise resilience before, during and after natural/man made and or technological incidents or events.”

The request was posted on January 21st, 2014 with a response date of February 14th.

In hindsight, the posting contained some very ominous indicators disguised by it’s mundane language. For one, the limited response time certainly gives the request a sense of urgency.

Keywords like ‘preparedness’ and ‘all-hazard emergency/crisis’ are strikingly similar to our news headlines now as we enter the third month of the officially recognized Border Crisis.

Support was sought for ‘enterprise resilience’ bringing to mind widespread looting or even economic collapse “before, during and after natural/man made and or technological incidents or events”

Eerily, it was these three elements that created the Border Crisis.

800px-Si_se_puede,_Tejas_Obama (1)2

Reports of numerous pandemic causing diseases have not slowed the regime’s efforts to accommodate anyone willing to violate our border. Central and South American newspapers have for months reported that ‘children’ and families will not be turned away but instead will be eligible to vote and receive welfare. Once again, a statistically unlikely computer glitch has conveniently provided the regime with a form of plausible deniability, just like with Obamacare.

 

Over the past year, as independent journalists monitored the FedBizOpps site to keep track of the record stockpiling of ammunition and other suspicious acquisitions by the Federal Government, several requests by FEMA in August 2013 raised red flags signaling the government’s preparation for some unknown, imminent emergency.

Requests from FEMA were put out for an indefinite supply of freeze-dried food, bottled water for up to four years, cutlery kits, beverage dispensers “capable of holding hot or cold beverages,” paper towel dispensers, assorted tea bags, hot chocolate mix, drink/punch mix, lemonade mix, and assorted fruit juice in bottles.

illegal-immigrant-children-palm-aire-hotel-665x385

 

Also in August 2013, FEMA requested (using all caps) “CLOTHING COMMODITIES”, stating that “CONTRACTORS MUST DEMONSTRATE CAPACITY TO DELIVER AT LEAST 50,000 ITEMS WITHIN 48 HOURS. CONTRACTORS WITH HIGHER CAPACITY MAY RECEIVE GREATER CONSIDERATION.”

That same month a request was made for emergency shelters, and shelter cleaning kits. Then in February 2014 came a request for 150 manufactured homes per week that could be deployed to any state in the country with the potential to become permanent housing.

Additional orders for Bulk Hygiene Kits, Waste Removal Services and “Evacuation Planning and Operational Support for Motor Coaches” left little room for speculation. The government seemed to know for certain that something terrible was coming.

(full story here)

These preparations finally made sense this summer when an unprecedented number of illegal immigrants started flooding across the border and the Federal Government gave them refuge instead of turning them back.

Why would the US Government partner with the United Nations in order to create an immigration emergency that’s predicted to cause an ‘overwhelming public health crisis’ and may possibly be the last nail in the coffin for our domestic economy?th (1)

 

The real question is, given the multi-billion dollar surveillance apparatus that we funded after 9/11 (largely to prevent people from sneaking over our border) and with the omniscience of the NSA at it’s disposal; how could the Border Crisis happen if the Federal Government wasn’t allowing it?

Revealed: The REAL reason why no one can criticize Obama. And I mean NO ONE.


If you can control the language than you can control the message! Propaganda 101!

deacon303's avatarWhiskey Tango Foxtrot

1. Criticizing Obama…

Former president Jimmy Carter said, “I think an overwhelming portion of the intensely demonstrated animosity toward President Barack Obama is based on the fact that he is a black man.”

2. Calling Obama a “bully”…

ABC host Jack Tapper: “When you hear Republicans say that President Obama is being a bully, you hear racial subtexts?”Michael Eric Dyson: “Of course.”

3. Calling Obama “angry…”

“That really bothered me. You notice Romney said anger twice. He’s really trying to use racial coding and access some really deep stereotypes about the angry black man. This is part of the playbook against Obama, the ‘otherization,’ he’s not like us. I know it’s a heavy thing, I don’t say it lightly, but this is ‘n*ggerization.’” — Touré

4. Pointing out that Obama lies…

“Surrounded by middle-aged white guys — a sepia snapshot of the days when such pols ran Washington like their…

View original post 161 more words

Border Patrol Agent: “These People Are Coming Here to do Horrible Things.”


We need to listen to those that have been there not those that won’t go there!

thomas madison's avatarPowdered Wig Society

ZMoran

 by Veronica Coffin

It’s  time for conservatives to stop playing into the left’s narrative concerning the invasion of America. We are under no obligation to accept the surge of illegals streaming into this country any more than a family is obliged to accept an intruder in their home.

Further, this invasion is not a discussion about the rights of poor, migrant children. The vast majority of these “children” coming from Central and South America are “children” up to their late teens and many have gang affiliations in their home countries. While we are bogged down with a discussion concerning humanitarian efforts, we are welcoming MS-13 members and providing a wonderful gateway for terrorists by maintaining a laughably unsecure border.
Who should we listen to? Should we listen to President Obama and the rest of the radicalized Democrat Party who eagerly await a new voter base? Or should we listen to…

View original post 299 more words