Tag Archives: FTC

Apr 19 2015

An EMP attack on America seems likely


This is a very real threat not to be taken lightly!

danmillerinpanama's avatardanmillerinpanama

Some consider North Korea to be the rogue nation most likely to use an electromagnetic pulse (EMP) to attack America; Iran is also seen as quite likely to do it. It matters little which succeeds.

Here is a lengthy 2013 video about an EMP attack, what would happen and why:

The possibilities and consequences of an EMP attack on America are too horrific to contemplate; the “legitimate news media” generally ignore them. We therefore tend to relegate them to the realm of remote “tin foil hat conspiracy theories” and to focus instead on more congenial stuff — the latest sex scandal, Hillary Clinton’s campaign van parking in a disabled-only space and other matters unlikely to impact America to an extent even approaching that of an EMP attack. Meanwhile, most of “our” Congress Critters, who should know better, focus on opinion polls, filling their campaign coffers and getting richer personally while neglecting our atrophying missile defense systems and…

View original post 1,124 more words

Apr 19 2015

The Coming Storm


If we allow this to continue it WILL BE THE END OF AMERICA!

Apr 19 2015

FOURTH TURNING – THE SHADOW OF CRISIS HAS NOT PASSED – PART FOUR


I read the book when it came out in 1997 it is a must read for any serious study of politics. This is Part 4 of 4.

Apr 19 2015

FOURTH TURNING – THE SHADOW OF CRISIS HAS NOT PASSED – PART THREE


I read the book when it came out in 1997 it is a must read for any serious study of politics. This is Part 3 of 4

Apr 19 2015

Fourth Turning: The Shadow Of Crisis Has Not Passed – Part 2


I read the book when it came out in 1997 it is a must read for any serious study of politics. This is Part 2 of 4

Apr 19 2015

FOURTH TURNING – THE SHADOW OF CRISIS HAS NOT PASSED – PART ONE


I read the book when it came out in 1997 it is a must read for any serious study of politics.

Apr 19 2015

EPA MAKES KIDS FEEL GUILTY ABOUT TAKING BATH, FLUSHING TOILET: GOVERNMENT CONTROL IN YOUR BATHROOM


Wait — it will not be long until the regulate food as well!

burstupdates's avatarBurst Updates

View original post

Apr 19 2015

Another Civil Forfeiture – Veteran Loses $60,000 and Never Breaks a Single Law…


This is clearly a violation of the 4th Amendment! And what is expected of a police state!

Apr 19 2015

American Veteran Michelle Manhart Picks Up US Flag from Desecration at Georgia University – And Gets Arrested


Re-Posted from Freedom Outpost   April 18, 2015

In a valiant display of patriotism, Michelle Manhart picked up an American flag that was being trampled on by a bunch of young university punks. Keep in mind that this had been going on for three days at Valdosta State University. When Michelle stood up and did what the campus and no one else was willing to do, she resisted turning the flag over to police and stood her ground, guarding the flag until she was overpowered by police and arrested.

Michelle told what happened in her Facebook post, which as of the writing of this article had nearly 27,000 shares:

This first picture is what was going on at Valdosta “State” University for 3 days…The campus refused to do anything about it … So we decided to get the flag and give it the respect it deserved…We just wanted to remove it and dispose of it properly…The American flag represents our Freedom why would you want to walk on that??? Please repost as much as possible make this go viral people need to see the truth…I wonder if “Donors” of VSU are ok with this blatant disrespect of the flag.

Manhart is an Air Force veteran, who said that she did not go with the intent to take the flag, but to confront what was taking place.

“I did not want anything like this, but I got a call from a student who told me that the flag was on the ground, and they were walking on it,” said Manhart. “I was just going over there to pick up the flag off the ground. I don’t know what their cause is, but I went to pick it up because it doesn’t deserve to be on the ground.”

Though she was arrested, neither the group nor the officers are pressing charges.

“If your cause is racism then find some white people and walk on them,” she told The Valdosta Daily Times. “But to walk on the flag is walking on our symbol of freedom. You have the freedom to do what you are doing because of it. I’m not fighting against them. I’m fighting against the way they are going about it.”

She hopes the group will issue her a letter of apology and that she will be able to receive the flag and dispose of it properly.

Though the group protesting could not be determined to be VSU students, Andy Clark, vice president for enrollment, marketing and communications, said they were allowed to protest on campus.

From the statements in the video by the demonstrators, they definitely have had some serious brainwashing when it comes to their freedom here in America. They have the mentality of Al Sharpton and Jesse Jackson, a victim mentality.

The Valdosta Daily Times also provide a statement from the Board of Regents regarding the incident.

“We respect the rights of people to peacefully assemble and voice their opinions. Our primary concern is the safety of our students, faculty and staff and our ability to carry out our responsibilities to all our students on campus. We are monitoring the situation.”

Interestingly enough, according to the US Code regarding desecration of the United States Flag, it reads:

(a)(1) Whoever knowingly mutilates, defaces, physically defiles, burns, maintains on the floor or ground, or tramples upon any flag of the United States shall be fined under this title or imprisoned for not more than one year, or both.

(2) This subsection does not prohibit any conduct consisting of the disposal of a flag when it has become worn or soiled.

(b) As used in this section, the term “flag of the United States” means any flag of the United States, or any part thereof, made of any substance, of any size, in a form that is commonly displayed.

(c) Nothing in this section shall be construed as indicating an intent on the part of Congress to deprive any State, territory, possession, or the Commonwealth of Puerto Rico of jurisdiction over any offense over which it would have jurisdiction in the absence of this section.

(d)(1) An appeal may be taken directly to the Supreme Court of the United States from any interlocutory or final judgment, decree, or order issued by a United States district court ruling upon the constitutionality of subsection (a).

(2) The Supreme Court shall, if it has not previously ruled on the question, accept jurisdiction over the appeal and advance on the docket and expedite to the greatest extent possible.

(Added Pub. L. 90–381, §1, July 5, 1968, 82 Stat. 291; amended Pub. L. 101–131, §§2, 3, Oct. 28, 1989, 103 Stat. 777.)

Amendments

1989—Subsec. (a). Pub. L. 101–131, §2(a), amended subsec. (a) generally. Prior to amendment, subsec. (a) read as follows: “Whoever knowingly casts contempt upon any flag of the United States by publicly mutilating, defacing, defiling, burning, or trampling upon it shall be fined not more than $1,000 or imprisoned for not more than one year, or both.”

Subsec. (b). Pub. L. 101–131, §2(b), amended subsec. (b) generally. Prior to amendment, subsec. (b) read as follows: “The term ‘flag of the United States’ as used in this section, shall include any flag, standard colors, ensign, or any picture or representation of either, or of any part or parts of either, made of any substance or represented on any substance, of any size evidently purporting to be either of said flag, standard, color, or ensign of the United States of America, or a picture or a representation of either, upon which shall be shown the colors, the stars and the stripes, in any number of either thereof, or of any part or parts of either, by which the average person seeing the same without deliberation may believe the same to represent the flag, standards, colors, or ensign of the United States of America.”

Subsec. (d). Pub. L. 101–131, §3, added subsec. (d).

Short Title of 2000 Amendment

Pub. L. 106–547, §1, Dec. 19, 2000, 114 Stat. 2738, provided that: “This Act [enacting sections 716 and 1036 of this title] may be cited as the ‘Enhanced Federal Security Act of 2000’.”

Short Title of 1989 Amendment

Section 1 of Pub. L. 101–131 provided that: “This Act [amending this section] may be cited as the ‘Flag Protection Act of 1989’.”

Apparently, those that were violating the code here were neither fined nor imprisoned. Yet, the one who stood up and sought to protect it from desecration was arrested. Go figure!

We reached out to Mrs. Manhart for comment. As of the writing of this article, she has not responded.

Should you wish to contact the Dean’s Office concerning their allowance of such actions by the group desecrating the flag, here’s their contact information:

Brian Gerber, Interim Dean

229-333-5353

blgerber@valdosta.edu

 

Don Leech, Associate Dean

229-245-4822

dwleech@valdosta.edu

Apr 19 2015

U.S. Supreme Court Decides With The Catholic Church And Against Obamacare Mandates.


U.S. Supreme Court Decides With The Catholic Church And Against Obamacare Mandates..

Those in power, today, can not tolerate anything they do or want to do being questioned; for they desire to be absolute rulers and the sole holder of the sovereign!