Matt Gaetz Explains Why He Cannot Support Removal of Speaker Johnson


Posted originally on the CTH on April 2, 2024 | Sundance

During this interview with Dan Ball, Representative Matt Gaetz explains why he cannot support the effort by Marjorie Taylor Greene to vacate the chair and remove Speaker Mike Johnson. {Direct Rumble Link}

As outlined by Gaetz, there are two or three specific republicans, former democrats, who will vote to support Hakeem Jeffries if the opportunity arises.  With all of the exits from the GOP House team noted, it will be a struggle to keep the house in republican control in 2025 even with a resounding victory by President Trump.  WATCH:

The Left Wants to STEAL The People’s House!

The Arrogance of Politicians


Posted originally on Apr 1, 2024 by Martin Armstrong

Mike Davis: Article 3 Project Will File Judicial Misconduct Complaint Against D.C. Judge


Posted originally on Rumble By Bannons War Room on: Mar 29, 2024 at 06:00 pm EST

Liz Collin Reveals How the Justice System Was Weaponized Against Derek Chauvin


Posted originally on Rumble By Charlie Kirk show on: Mar 28, 2024 at 5:00 pm EST

Mike Davis: President Trump Should Create “Criminal Probe” Into Democrats’ Lawfare Attacks.


Posted originally on Rumble By Bannons War Room on: Mar 28, 2024 at 12:00 pm EST

$600,000 For 20 Minutes Work – Ronna McDaniel Likely to Have Significant Payday After NBC Firing


Posted originally on the CTH on March 27, 2024 | Sundance

As we noted yesterday, assuming the general termination clause in any employment contract exists, Ronna McDaniel is likely to get fully paid the terms of her 2-year previously signed contract amount as her firing was simply a breech by the hiring company, NBC.

Politico is reporting the former RNC chair is likely to receive exactly that.  Her two-year contract was for $300,000/yr totaling $600,000.

McDaniel was fired after one Meet the Press interview less than 20 minutes in duration.  Now she will likely get the full contract payment.

Politico – […] The ramifications of NBC’s decision yesterday to part ways with former RNC Chair Ronna McDaniel just two days after her paid network debut on “Meet the Press” are just starting to shake out. But they could be expensive.

McDaniel expects to be fully paid out for her contract — two years at $300,000 annually — since she did not breach its terms, according to a person close to McDaniel. That means that her single, not-quite-20-minute interview Sunday could cost NBC more than $30,000 per minute, or $500 per second.

That might be just the beginning of the fallout following yesterday’s announcement from NBCUniversal News Group Chair Cesar Conde that the deal, first announced on Friday, would be canceled. McDaniel spoke yesterday with Bryan Freedman, renowned lawyer to the estranged cable-news stars, to discuss legal options even beyond recouping the dollar value of her contract.

While no arrangement is final, the person close to McDaniel said, Freedman would be an obvious choice: He represented Megyn Kelly in her own acrimonious parting with NBC, as well as ousted anchors Chris Cuomo, Don Lemon and Tucker Carlson in disputes with their respective former networks.

McDaniel, the person said, is exploring potential defamation and hostile work environment torts after MSNBC’s top talent — momentarily her colleagues — took turns Monday blasting her on air.

NBC declined to comment about the $600,000 figure or her potential claims. (read more)

It’s enough to make you wonder if this entire NBC fiasco was just a purposeful laundering of money for previous services rendered.

Instead of going the book deal route, McDaniel gets hired by NBC then fired without cause a few days later.

Cha-ching, $600k, and NBC gets all the eyeballs and clicks that go with the hot mess story.

Intentional?

You decide.

Suspicious Cat remains, well, suspicious…

Democrats Push Legislation to Hire Migrants as Police Officers


Posted originally on Mar 27, 2024 By Martin Armstrong 

Police Writing Ticket

They permitted unknown persons into our country, handed them a tax-payer funded life, and now want to enable them to uphold law and order over American citizens. The globalists have truly launched an outright attack on American citizens with their plans to weaponize migrants. Virginia Republican Lt. Gov. Winsome Sears, a legal immigrant, shed some common sense on the situation – “WE DON’T KNOW WHO YOU ARE! WE DON’T KNOW YOUR INTENTIONS!”

It is bad enough that certain cities like Chicago are permitting migrants to carry firearms. Illinois Gov. J.B. Pritzker signed HB 3751 in January that would have permitted “individuals who are not citizens, but are legally authorized to work in the United States under federal law” to become law enforcement officers. So, legal citizens could be detained by illegal citizens under this failed bill.

SB 960 in California, proposed by far-left Democrat Sen. Nancy Skinner, aimed to also permit non-citizens to become police officers. California Governor Gavin Newsom signed SB 960 and every fact-checking source says that this is acceptable because they legally had to obtain work authorization and have some documentation so they can become “peace officers.” “Among the categories of work-authorized non-citizens that would likely be eligible are permanent workers – immigrant visa based on employment – asylees and refugees, and individuals who are protected under the Program of Deferred Action for Childhood Arrivals – DACA,” reads the analysis.

We have absolutely no idea who these migrants are or who they may be reporting to. Lt. Gov. Winsome Sears properly immigrated to America from Jamaica and took the proper steps to citizenship, as well as joining the Marines. She explained that every state has become a sanctuary city/state under federal provisions.

“Here’s the situation — we just have all become border states, and by the way, you notice that those states that claim to be… sanctuary states, sanctuary cities — suddenly they’re backing away from it when they realize that no, actually, Texas is not going to bear the burden of all of the folks coming across the border illegally, you’re going to have to share some of the pain,” Sears said.

How could these people not see the obvious conflict of interest? These people came into our country by ignoring our national laws, but they should be granted a government job that issues them authority over citizens? They could then permit migrants to enforce the law as they see fit. Police agencies are rapidly dwindling in the aftermath of BLM and defund the police hysteria. The police are powerless against migrants and are told not to bother them for they are above the law. Is the far-left attempting to form their own police forces under these policies? Something is clearly wrong.

Facing Backlash NBC Has Fired Recently Hired Ronna McDaniel


Posted originally on the CTH on March 26, 2024 | Sundance

Last Friday, NBC announced they had hired former RNC Chairwoman Ronna McDaniel.  Today, after much backlash over her hiring, they fired her.

Assuming there is an ordinary and/or reasonable termination clause in her contract, Ronna likely just became one of the highest paid political/media personalities for 3-days of work.  Sheesh, what a hot mess.

WASHINGTON – NBC and Ronna McDaniel have severed ties following unprecedented internal backlash over the network’s decision to hire her as a political analyst, including top NBC personalities denouncing the move on-air.

“After listening to the legitimate concerns of many of you, I have decided that Ronna McDaniel will not be an NBC News contributor,” NBCUniversal News Group Chair Cesar Conde wrote in a message to employees. (read more)

Unrelated/Semi-Related story I forgot to mention earlier.  When I was recently flying out of Washington DC, I happened to be on a flight with dozens of former and current Intelligence Community bureaucrats – all from DC, and all heading to some kind of symposium.   On this flight you could watch television on your monitor, pick the channel and watch it (not a very long flight).

Every single one of the IC people from DC, including former Acting CIA Director Mike Morrell (see below), chose to watch MSNBC on their monitor.

I thought to myself, ‘this should indicate something.’  lolol But, I kept quiet and just read their emails, text messages, and whatever else I could see on their laptops 

The US Government’s Plan for Social Security


Posted originally on Mar 26, 2024 By Martin Armstrong 

Social Security Cards

When questioned about the future of Social Security by the Senate Finance Committee, Treasury Secretary Janet Yellen admitted that Biden “doesn’t have a plan.” There could be no possible plan for an ongoing Ponzi scheme that will fail once the fund runs out of money.

Estimates believe Social Security will reach insolvency before 2034. “I don’t have that computation to offer you,” before saying, “The president doesn’t have a plan. He has principles.” Principles do not put food on the table.

Of course, lawmakers immediately look at raising our taxes. “I’ll note that there’s already been $4.9 trillion in new taxes proposed for those making over $400,000 a year. It seems to be the go-to place, fill in the blank, we’re going to tax those over $400,000 a year for whatever,” Sen. Bill Cassidy, R-La., told Yellen. “Of that $4.9 trillion, none of that has been dedicated to Social Security.” We are raising taxes to fund extravagant climate change packages and wars. None of the money we give to our government goes back into the community.

The likelihood of Social Security remaining as it is today is ZERO. There is more likely to be a huge split in interest rates from the private sector compared to the public at the federal level.

As I have stated before, I donated my time to work with Congress back in the ’90s in an attempt to reform Social Security, transforming it into a wealth fund that was allocated out among managers. I was even shuttling between the Chairman of the House Ways & Means Committee, Bill Archer, and the House Majority Leader Dick Army. I argued for the privatization of Social Security to allow it to become a wealth fund and allow it to invest in equities. The Democrats would not vote for it, so this is why Social Security today cannot survive. Social Security invests 100% in government bonds, meaning it does not even earn a fair interest rate.

The Democrats painted this private investment as “risky,” and they voted against it. So, Social Security invests 100% in government bonds. Let’s see. The Fed lowered the interest rates to “stimulate” the economy. The net effect is that Social Security is simply a slush fund with no possible economic growth. The loss has come at the “opportunity risk” of leaving the money in bonds.

I laid out the structure for allocating money according to the track record of the manager. I was doing this because I had no interest in managing money of this nature. The Democrats wanted to replace the fund managers at will when they retook the majority. I explained that this decision should not be political. I did not care if the fund manager voted Democrat or Republican. That just never sunk in. Had Social Security simply become a wealth fund as so many nations around the world have adopted, it would NOT be in danger of a financial crisis today.

Now, I do not believe they will stop paying Social Security, but they could reduce payments and continue raising the age at which recipients may receive benefits, especially since the average life expectancy for Americans is on the decline. Take Venezuela for example. They honor their pensions, but what you get today will buy only a cup of coffee. Yet another major government-created crisis that could have been avoided.

NY Supreme Court Lowers Trump’s Bond to $175m


Posted originally on Mar 25, 2024 By Martin Armstrong

Trumos Bond reduced 175_Million 3 15 24

COMMENT: Marty, you are one hell of a strategic lawyer. The NY Supreme Court either reads you or realizes that this AG will bankrupt the city if she starts seizing property and Trump wins in the appellate courts. It’s just brilliant. Let them sell his properties that will collapse in price and then sue for the original value.

You should be on our board.

All the best

UT

ANSWER: The New York State Supreme Court is probably getting negative feedback from the major banks and companies in NYC. I can confirm that people are exiting NYC because of this case. I would have preferred that they seized the property, sold it for $1, and then I would own NYC for a song. It was the perfect hedge. They would become liable for the maximum value so that it would have been selling at the top, and the government would have been the buyer.

As they say, you must be VERY careful about what you wish for.

They were trying to consume all of his cash to drain his ability to run in the 2024 election