Trump never talks about things that are not true the media and others are too stupid to understand this!
Tag Archives: Obama administration
Putin on the origin of ISIS
Putin is mostly right all these problems in the middle east have there source in what Obama has been doing. Putin is not innocent of miss-action himself but one would have to say 90% is Obama and only 10% Putin.
Marco Rubio’s claim that no recent mass shootings would have been prevented by gun laws
We can not let the 2nd amendment be nullified as without the 2nd the rest and the constitution are gone.
“None of the major shootings that have occurred in this country over the last few months or years that have outraged us, would gun laws have prevented them.”
— Sen. Marco Rubio (R-Fla.). interview on CBS’s “This Morning,” Dec. 4, 2015
We developed the following list of 12 mass shootings since 2012 listed in the Mother Jones database of U.S. mass shootings, with details obtained from various news and official reports. We will look at whether proposals might have made a difference in how the guns were obtained, or whether existing laws worked as intended.
Mass Shootings since 2012
Dec. 2, 2015: Syed Farook and Tashfeen Malik killed 14 people in San Bernardino, Calif., using a Smith & Wesson M&P AR-15 type rifle, a DPMS Panther Arms AR-15 type rifle, a Smith & Wesson semiautomatic pistol and a Llama semiautomatic pistol. The guns were purchased legally and the rifles were purchased…
View original post 1,270 more words
Some Prerequisites on Becoming a Naturalized Citizen of the United States
By Prof. Paul Eidelberg
On becoming a naturalized citizen of the United States, the Naturalization Act of 1790 set the criteria for naturalization to two years of residency, proof of good moral character, and an oath to support the Constitution.
It also mandated that one must “absolutely and entirely renounce and abjure all allegiance and fidelity to every foreign Prince, Potentate, State or Sovereignty.”
Does the latter prerequisite place in question whether a devout Muslim immigrant is eligible for citizenship in the United States?
Thoughts on Citizenship
By Prof. Paul Eidelberg
December 9, 2015
1) Citizenship is the grant of a personal status to the citizen and it creates a bond of loyalty between the citizen and the State, and endows him or her with nationality.
2) Naturalized citizens may be required to take a pledge of loyalty. For example:
“I pledge allegiance to the flag of the United States and to the Republic for which it stands: one nation indivisible with liberty and justice for all.”
3) Citizenship carries with it both rights and responsibilities. Citizens should work toward the betterment of their community through economic participation, public service, volunteer work, and other such efforts to improve life for all citizens.
4) Citizenship as thus defined will not be conspicuous in a population whose children were not imbued with a strong sense of national character. This obviously applies to illegal Muslim and Hispanic immigrants in America who maintain their past sympathies or attachments.
5) Japan does not give citizenship to a child born of Japanese parents if the child was raised abroad by his own parents, as might happen if the parents were in the diplomatic corps.
6) Under Jordan’s Nationality law of February 4, 1954, a person became a Jordanian national if, “not being Jewish, he possessed Palestine nationality before May 14, 1948 and, at the date of publication of this law, was ordinarily resident in the Hashemite Kingdom of Jordan.” This is less a manifestation of racism than of national pride and political prudence.
7) Making Muslims citizens of a Jewish state is more foolish than making Jews citizens of any Muslim state, considering only the disparity in their respective populations in the Middle East.
Just as only Jews are qualified to make the laws of a Jewish state – think of the knowledge and reverence required to preserve the Jewish tradition, its religious precepts and practices, its methods of education, the memory of its great teachers and leaders – so only Muslims are qualified to make the laws of any Muslim state.
8) A large majority of Muslim citizens of Israel identify with Israel’s enemies, including Hamas, Hezbollah, and Iran. In fact, many of these Muslim citizens have aided and/or committed terrorist attacks against Israel.
9) The Balfour Declaration, the St. Remo Convention, the Anglo-American Accord, the UN Resolution affirming the establishment of the State of Israel, and Israel’s own Declaration of Independence, designate Israel as a Jewish state, and not as a multicultural state. The latter designation simply reflects the disloyal preference of post-Zionists in Israel, as well as of certain members of Israel’s Supreme Court, as may be seen in various rulings of the Court’s former and most influential Chief Justice, Aharon Barak.
10) That it is not simple for a devout Muslim to identify with Israel as a Jewish state is obvious. It is also obvious that Muslims in America are not thrilled to pledge allegiance to secular America. But that is the condition of enjoying the rights and opportunities that come with Israeli or American citizenship.
11) Citizenship for an immigrant with traditional moral values can be problematic in certain democracies.
12) The reason is this. There are two kinds of Democracy, contemporary, normless democracy, and classical normative democracy. Freedom and Equality are their basic principles. However, in a Normless democracy, freedom and equality lack ethical and rational constraints. The situation is otherwise in a normative democracy, where freedom and equality are rooted in the Bible’s conception of man’s creation in the Image of God.
13) Neither Israel nor America can be classified rightly as a Normative Democracy, not only because their Supreme Courts have legalized pornography, homosexuality, and same-sex marriage. The political leaders of these two democracies have amplified their normless propensities by consorting with and appeasing Muslim despots dedicated to their country’s destruction.
14) Therefore, given the absence of substantive normative principles and the pervasive moral equivalency in present-day America and Israel, and further, given the fact that this immoral posture goes on and on in both countries without discernible public protest or outrage; and further, since both countries have thereby betrayed their Judeo-Christian foundations – citizenship in both countries has become a travesty.
As a consequence, one may well wonder whether they are worthy of citizens sacrificing life and limb against their Islamic enemies, whose disloyal acts and pronounced dedication to the demise of both Israel and America, render these Muslims unworthy of respect and even tolerance.
LEVIN GOES NUCLEAR ON OBAMA!! We Don’t Need Your DAMN Lectures!
Levin is right of course! Obama is anti-American and always has been!
Hillary Clinton: No War On Islamic State Over a Few ‘Radicals,’ but All-Out War on Guns Over a Few Criminals
Actually we are at war with both the Muslims and the progressives (Marxists) in our own government. Both want to dominate us and take ALL are freedoms.
Clinton responded by almost answering the question–she admitted the existence of “radical elements who use a dangerous and distorted view of Islam to promote their jihadist ambitions,” but she still would not support war against “radical Islam.”
So Stephanopoulos kept at it, asking “What’s the problem with radical Islam?” and asking why Clinton can’t saying we’re fight radical Islam “even though the qualifier ‘radical’ is there?”
Clinton finally gave up the goods:
No, because, look, that — you know enough about religion, you’ve studied it. And there are radicals, people who believe all kinds of things in every religion in the world.
I don’t want to do that because, number one, it doesn’t do justice to the vast numbers of Muslims in our own country and around the world who are peaceful people.
Number two, it helps to create this clash of civilizations that is actually a recruiting tool for…
View original post 316 more words
The gate is now closing only Trump can stop it!
How tyrants enslave free people….
Marx said, “Remove one freedom per generation and soon you will have no freedom and no one would have noticed.”
There was a chemistry professor in a large college that had some exchange students in the class. One day while the class was in the lab, the professor noticed one young man, an exchange student, who kept rubbing his back and stretching as if his back hurt.
The professor asked the young man what was the matter. The student told him he had a bullet lodged in his back. He had been shot while fighting communists in his native country who were trying to overthrow his country’s government and install a new communist regime. In the midst of his story, he looked at the professor and asked a strange question. He asked: “Do you know how to catch wild pigs?”
The professor thought it was a joke and asked for the punch line. The young man said that it was no joke. “You catch wild pigs by finding a suitable place in the woods and putting corn on the ground. The pigs find it and begin to come every day to eat the free food”.
“When they are used to coming every day, you put a fence down one side of the place where they are used to coming. When they get used to the fence, they begin to eat the corn again and you put up another side of the fence”. “They get used to that and start to eat again.
You continue until you have all four sides of the fence up with a gate in the last side”. “The pigs, which are used to the free corn, start to come through the gate to eat that free corn again. You then slam the gate on them and catch the whole herd”.
“Suddenly the wild pigs have lost their freedom. They run around and around inside the fence, but they are caught. Soon they go back to eating the free corn. They are so used to it that they have forgotten how to forage in the woods for themselves, so they accept their captivity.”
The young man then told the professor that is exactly what he sees happening in America . The government keeps pushing us toward Communism/Socialism and keeps spreading the free corn out in the form of programs such as supplemental income, tax credit for unearned income, tax exemptions, tobacco subsidies, dairy subsidies, payments not to plant crops (CRP), welfare entitlements, medicine, drugs, etc., while we continually lose our freedoms, just a little at a time as the government forces us to participate in many of these programs whether or not we want to.
One should always remember two truths: There is no such thing as a free lunch, and you can never hire someone to provide a service for you cheaper than you can do it yourself. If you see that all of this wonderful government “help” is a problem confronting the future of democracy in America, you might want to share this with your friends.
……help us all when the gate slams shut!
The US government wants this here and so it is what is coming here and very soon!
The French Are to Surrender ALL Rights?
The French newspaper LeMonde has reported from leaked documents just how much the Hollande Government wants to repeal the Constitution. Under this state of emergency, Hollande was to allow “searches of vehicles and luggage without the consent of individuals”, the “identity checks (…) without the need for law enforcement to prove circumstances special “and” an obligation to report his movements measurement (intermediate step before the arrest) “.
That still does not go far enough for Hollande. He wants without consent to “make the DNA samples” and fingerprints, for example. Then it gets much worse. He wants to “prohibit the free Wi-Fi connections and shared” during the state of emergency and remove the “public WiFi connections”, “under penalty criminal sanctions “, because of the difficulty of identifying people connected.
By declare war on TERRORISM, one does not face a country or army. Thus, this becomes a war that can never end. We no longer need an invading army to destroy Western culture. Our politicians will do it for us.
The Government does have, almost total, control of the Press Today!
Censorship of the Press / Self-Censorship By the Press
Many articles are highlighting the censorship of the press in Thailand where the International New York Times printed an article critical of the generals that they were shooting the economy in the foot in all its other print editions, the Thailand version displayed a blank space to let everyone know something had been removed – censorship. What is NOT being written in the West, both in Europe and the United States, is that mainstream press have SURRENDERED the freedom of the people and engage in SELF-CENSORSHIP.
Thomas Jefferson understood what a free press meant. It was Thomas Pane’s Common Sense that finally roused the American public to get off their ass and fight for what was important – the freedom and dignity to decide what they would do with their own labor. Jefferson wrote in a letter to Thomas Cooper on November 29th, 1802:
“The press [is] the only tocsin of a nation. [When it] is completely silenced… all means of a general effort [are] taken away.” (ME 10:341)
Jefferson also wrote to Edward Carrington in 1787:
“The basis of our governments being the opinion of the people, the very first object should be to keep that right; and were it left to me to decide whether we should have a government without newspapers or newspapers without a government, I should not hesitate a moment to prefer the latter. But I should mean that every man should receive those papers and be capable of reading them.” (ME 6:57)
It was explained to be by Steven Bumbaca who had been the vice president of the New York Post that the press knew I was innocent after Judge Owen closed the court, threw the press out, and then altered the court transcripts to hide the fact that he violated the fundamental principle of a free society – we are supposed to have PUBLIC TRIALS. The Associated Press was in the courtroom and was removed by Judge Owen. The journalist at least reported that Judge Owen removed all my lawyers that day in a “closed hearing.”
After that incident, everything changed. The press is controlled by government in Europe and in the United States by prosecutors. The press will be given a call and told they want a “favor” to kill a story or slant it in a particular direction. If the journalist does not comply, they go after them with various laws like tax evasion or something else not to allow it to appear like direct press censorship. This is why mainstream media will not report the truth about so much. They cannot. Federal judges are appointed by politicians, they are government employees, and defend the government. The free press cannot exist with Federal Judges.
At the time that Judge Owen threw the Associated Press out and altered the court transcript to omit all these events and to remove the traditional starting sentence “In an open court”, you would think this would have been enough proof that I was denied a fundamental right beside my lawyers being removed. No, the Chief Judge John Walker (Bush’s cousin) refused to allow me to even submit an appeal. I could not get it even docketed to be heard.
The press is NOT free because they are scared to death that if they ever really exposed the Justice System and how a conviction rate of about 70% has soared to about 99% and the government is NEVER wrong, they would find themselves perhaps dead or in prison.
Michael Hastings was the journalist exposing the surveillance state. Hastings wrote warned about the investigation of reporters by the U.S. Department of Justice back in 2013. He said that the restrictions on the freedom of the press by the Obama administration as a “war” on journalism. He wrote his last story before he died in what may have been a cyber attack where his car was controlled remotely and driven into a tree at top speed. His last story was entitled: “Why Democrats Love to Spy On Americans”, published by BuzzFeed on June 7, 2013.
Hastings died in a fiery high-speed automobile crash on June 18, 2013, in Los Angeles. Today, cars are connected with GSP and actually can be hacked. It is possible to take control of your car right down to the steering wheel remotely. WIRED Magazine has proven this ability. Many others have confirmed this ability to take control of your car and they could indeed kill you remotely. The likelihood that Hastings was killed remotely in a auto-cyber attack is extremely high.
Earlier the previous day, Hastings actually told others that he believed he was being investigated by the FBI. In an email to colleagues, which was copied to and released by Hastings’ friend, Army Staff Sergeant Joe Biggs, Hastings said that he was “onto a big story”, that he needed to “go off the radar”, and that the FBI might interview them. WikiLeaks announced that Hastings had also contacted Jennifer Robinson, one of its lawyers, a few hours prior to the crash, and the LA Weekly reported that he was preparing new reports on the CIA at the time of his death. It believed he was onto the Snowden story.
There are those Behind the Curtain that view everything only through their eyes. The game afoot is to protect themselves and prevent the truth from coming out because they have society’s best interest at heart – we just do not understand that is more important than anyone’s life or a scrap of paper we call the Constitution. We will NEVER regain our freedom until the press makes that first step. Thus, it must crash and burn – that is what history warns.
Centinel2012 