At the heart of any psychopolitical operation is the need to portray the nation, (or population) under attack, as being insane. The society must come to view itself as being “sick” in order to accept the tenets of communism as a method of mental healing. We have witnessed a relentless assault on conservatism and constitutionalists in this nation, because we are the ones that need to be thoroughly destroyed and discredited, in order for Obama’s unconstitutional agenda to move forward. You could argue that the real target when employing these tactics, are future generations, as a thorough trashing of America and our history seems to be the main topic in our public schools. Remember, Marxist’s believe that if you get children early enough, you can wield influence over them for the rest of their lives. In this installment in my series on psychopolitics, I intend to connect this strategy not only to discrediting conservatism, but destroying the second amendment as well.

The realm of defamation and degradation, to the psychopolitician, is man himself. By attacking the character and morals of man himself, and by bringing about, through contamination of youth, a general degraded feeling, command of the populace is facilitated to a very marked degree.  “Brainwashing- A Synthesis on the Russian Textbook on Psychopolitics.”

In my article entitled “The culture changing PopTart,” I addressed the alarming rate which kids were being suspended from school for doing anything that might suggest, the slightest interest in firearms. The main point was the story about Josh Welch, who was suspended for biting a pop tart into the shape of a gun. In this case, an interest in guns wasn’t even an issue, young Josh had later admitted he was trying to make a mountain. The problem was a hypersensitive, liberal teacher who was dutifully carrying out the left’s anti gun agenda by attempting to scare the rest of the kids half to death. What they are attempting to do is shame our children into compliance with their socialist world view.  By sinking the image of guns as being “bad” at such a young age, the left is virtually ensuring a generation of automatons who will eagerly surrender their guns, if not their parents’ guns as well.  They do this by portraying the gun owner as insane, and in need of mental treatment; and by allowing a degraded, shameful feeling to develop in the child.

As most are aware, the still Democrat controlled senate just confirmed a second amendment advocates worse nightmare, to the office of surgeon general. Vivek Murthy is a rabid anti second amendment proponent, who believes he is going to connect gun ownership to disease in need of treatment. Gun ownership is America’s sickness, and by labeling it a public health menace, he will have effectively cemented the process of brainwashing our future generations into accepting gun control. The process starts very early in elementary education (as earlier mentioned) and is carried on in colleges and universities as our  children are being taught to be “agents of social change.” Murthy will spend billions funding bogus studies in an attempt to prove his hypothesis, and because he is the Surgeon General, they will be studied by all in the field of medicine. Anyone who goes against the narrative will feel the wrath, and the majority working in the fields of medicine will eagerly carry the narrative for promotions.

The populace must be brought into the belief that every individual within it, who rebels in any way, shape or form against efforts and activities to enslave the whole, must be considered to be a deranged person whose eccentricities are neurotic or insane, and who must have at once the treatment of a psychopolitician. “Brainwashing- A Synthesis on the Russian Textbook on Psychopolitics.”

The publishing of bogus academic papers is a very effective method of indoctrination. Take the article “Political Conservatism as Motivated Social Cognition” by John T. Jost, Jack Glazer, Arie W. Kruglanski, and Frank J. Sulloway. The authors of this academic paper attempt to “scientifically” prove that political conservatives are, for a lack of better words, mentally ill. They define the term conservative on their terms by describing political conservatives as being afraid of change, rigid and accepting of social inequalities that perpetuate our own “perceived superiority.”  For Truths Sake, could this sound any more familiar? This is all opinion on the part of researchers that are biased to begin with. Nowhere in this article is there any mention of the FACT that societies that have attempted to force total egalitarianism often succumb to committing mass genocide because they believed people that didn’t go along with the agenda, were somehow defective and insane. I guess we have come full circle on that one, haven’t we? Also, the researchers are basing their work on the basis in which they view the world; social science and Darwinism. No where is there any mention of a conservatives belief about the capabilities of all men, the article just presumes their worldview is the truth.

With all of this being said, the desired definition of political conservatism has certainly taken a hold through the use of papers like this one. Just as the use of opinions and fabricated data was used to cement these false perceptions, so it will be with the bogus, biased research that Vivek Murthy intends to inundate the medical world with.

Better brace your self America, you’re about to be labeled mentally ill for owning a gun. Don’t be surprised if it ends up a diagnosis in the new Diagnostic Staticians Manual.