This election will be interesting as Goldman has owned both parties since the 1980’s!


What Would Goldman Sachs Do If It Loses Both Parties?

Trump-Sanders

 

The latest poll in New Hampshire shows Bernie Sanders has 53% support compared to Clinton’s 39% in the Monmouth University Poll released Tuesday, with Martin O’Malley in third place at 5%. Meanwhile, Trump soars well ahead of everyone else and Bush collapsed to 4%. This begs the question: What will Goldman Sachs do if it does not own both candidates? Goldman has owned both the Republican and the Democratic candidates since the late 1980s. This could be the FIRST election where the New York Bankers do not own either candidate. OMG! What will New York do? secede?

Yuge Endorsement – Godmother of Conservative Principles, Phyllis Schlafly, Endorses Donald J Trump for President…


THIS IS YUGE make sure it is spread to all who can read! To the rest there is no hope until we go back to where we were 50 years ago and eliminate federal control of everything!!

The Professional Political Machine Says: “Donald Trump is Not Conservative” (Part 2)…


One can differ on details of these plans but from where where now these kinds of changes are exactly what are needed. Therefore we can be sure no one will like them in the GOPe or the progressive left which wants total control of everything!

Another Unbelievable Update: Why Does Harney County Sheriff David Ward Want Hammond Family Story Hidden?…


The federal government wants ALL the land so they can implement UN Agenda 21 under all its many and diverse sub names and programs such as VIBRANT 2040 in north east Ohio. These programs are in every state.

Markets are down and the war cycle is coming 2018 is going to be a very dangerous year.


The Euro & 2017 – The Beginning of the End

IBEUUS-Y 1-9-2016

The closing for the Euro at 10869 provided a long-term Yearly Bearish Reversal which we have been citing throughout last year: “We have Yearly Bearish Reversals are 11645 and 10365. So the 116 level will remain as reactionary resistance this year and the 10365 level is key support just below the current low of 10460.”

The 116 level remains the reactionary resistance target. If we are going to look to sell this currency, that is what we should look at for any rally. Nevertheless, we do have an initial Weekly Bullish at the 11055 area and a small gap up to the 11365-11375 area. It may be difficult to get through that level of resistance.

IBEUUS-W 1-9-2016

We can see that the oscillator has showed a recovery to some extent. We have not achieved any of the sell signals so far. We still have the Weekly Bearish at 105.20 so we have seen nothing but consolidation to date.

The fact that we did close 2015 below the 116.45 Yearly Bearish Reversal confirms the trend is down long-term. We held the major Bearish at 103.65 so that signaled here that we may not see an early conclusion to this trend either. So here too we may not see a low in the Euro (high in Dollar) before 2018 at best with the potential here as well of an extension into 2020/2021.

With the stock markets, crude, the Euro, and the Chinese economy looking into 2020 and the potential that Japan collapses into a full Pi Cycle of 31.4 years from the 1989 high which also puts this into the 2020 time slot, We must keep an eye on the War Cycle which heats up in 2017. Such periods of conflict on average last about 3 years for a single nation v nation conflict. World War I lasted 4.291 years (about half an 8.6 year cycle), and World War II when combined between Europe and Asia lasted 5.953 years. Therefore, if we were to see an international war from 2017, one would expect it to end by 2021. This War Cycle also has the domestic Civil Unrest component hitting simultaneously. This also appears to rise sharply following 2017, which is the year of major political change.

Therefore, the markets appear to be telling us there is an extension in the wind when we look at all of them across the board. Gold also avoided the key sell signal at 1044 for the closing of 2015 and bottomed on the first Benchmark. This too was like Crude – not a buy signal, just an avoidance of a near-term sell signal and hence the bounce. Nevertheless, unlike Crude which elected a Yearly Bearish at the 41 level warning no new record highs, Gold has never elected a Yearly Bearish so new highs remain on the horizon moving forward.

Everything is starting to imply that this is NOT going to END in 2017, but it is starting to appear that will be the BEGINNING of the end. So we still see that the opportunity to sell the Euro will arrive as will the time to finally buy the Dow. Neither have given us a signal just yet so it looks like we may get to sell the rally in the Euro and buy the low in the Dow.

U.K Releases Phone Transcript Between Tony Blair and Muamar Gaddafi – February 25th 2011…


I hope Trump is right and they are “just really stupid people in the White House” but I fear that its the other way and that these people mean to destroy the country one way or the other — Occam’s Razor the simplest answer is normal the best.!

Bill Whittle is good but this one is really GOOD a must watch!


THIS WOMAN KNOWS WHAT SHE IS TALKING ABOUT!


What’s Really Going on in Oregon! Taking Back the Narrative ! KrisAnne Hall

 

The more oppressive the government becomes the more the people will resist!


US Armed Confrontation With Government

WACO USConfrontation

Reuters has put together a catalogue of armed confrontation with the US government over the past few decades. Interesting review.

The Danger of Executive Action


Executive actions are those that have questionable legal basis. Executive orders are those which are probably legally sound.

deacon303's avatarWhiskey Tango Foxtrot

We’ve come to a place in our political discourse when government action often is perceived as more important than respecting the traditions and institutions upon which that very government derives its authority. Many Americans are impatient with the process required by our system of checks and balances.

The recent announcement by President Obama regarding his “executive actions to reduce gun violence” certainly reveals this impatience:

“But we do have to feel a fierce sense of urgency about it. In Dr. King’s words, we need to feel the fierce urgency of now. Because people are dying and the constant excuses for action no longer do, no longer suffice. That’s why we’re here today, not to debate the last mass shooting but to prevent the next one.”

For some on the Right, the idea of executive action on guns is seen as a gross violation of the Constitution and a way for…

View original post 485 more words