What Drives Obama?


Well it’s not all that hard to determine since he claimed he was going to Fundamentally Change America and that he thought we needed a Bill of Positive Rights and that he believed in the redistribution of wealth when he was campaigning in 2008. One could assume many things from that but since his background was that of being surrounded by Progressives, Communists’ and Muslims none of which like the United States that wasn’t a good start. Fast forward to the period from his inauguration to the present and what do we find.

Well he starts with a world apology tour in Cairo and then unconstitutionally opens up our borders to just about any one while dissing our friends e.g. returning Churchill’s bust to England; supporting our enemies e.g. not supporting the green movement in Iran; downsizing our military creating a power vacuum; and refusing to consider other sides of the issues despite two massive election losses (2010 and 2014) for his party; but worse of all is his ignoring of the Christian and Jewish slaughter being conducted by Muslims in the Middle East, Europe and America. These actions and in-actions would not have been done by someone that liked America.

So we are left with why does he do what he does?

Determining the validity or truth of an idea or statement isn’t always easy and never has been easy. A fourteenth-century philosopher William of Occam had a useful rule of thumb for this quandary. We now know it as Occam’s Razor, and it is often stated thusly: “The simplest explanation is usually the best.”

The original Latin –“Pluralitas non est ponenda sine necessitate” — adds a wrinkle. This translates roughly, “Multiple variables are not to be posited without necessity.”

A more modern form of this principle is called the Duck test which is a humorous term for a form of inductive reasoning. This is its usual expression: “If it looks like a duck, swims like a duck, and quacks like a duck, then it probably is a duck.”

The test implies that a person can identify an unknown subject by observing that subject’s habitual characteristics. It is sometimes used to counter abstruse, or even valid, arguments that something is not what it appears to be.

There are only two possible answers the fit the circumstances, one he is a Muslim and two he is a Communist. But in his case he could be both a Muslim and a Communist despite they are not really compatable believe structures. But having said that both require total control of the people in all areas and a very strong central government; the only real difference between them is one is secular and the other theocratic.

Is it possible to hold both views in a single mind I don’t know but since Obama obviously is a trouble person that maybe why he does what he does; which to most of us — really does not make rational sense.

Homeland Security Warns of Terrorist Threat from Right-Wingers


It has been apparent for several years now that Obama disliked patriotic Americans especially if the believed in a Christian God and the US Constitution. Every since he took office he was moving closer and closer to being able to censor our thoughts and classify us, especially the Tea Party, as the real problem in America. I think this is the year it will all come together.

Firewall with Bill Whittle: Brass Tacks on Immigration


February 20, 2015 In his latest Firewall video entitled “Brass Tacks on Immigration” Bill Whittle takes on the issue of illegal immigration. As usual he hits this one out of the park.

Obama Suggests His Critics Are ‘Embracing the Terrorists’ Narrative’


I will agree that the biggest threat to America is a domestic citizen but sadly its president Obama that is the biggest threat to the country. But there is hope he only has 23 more months in office!ther is no doubt in my mind that with all that Obama is doing the republicans can run anyone it will not matter no Democrat will be able to win in 2016 after the damage that Obama has done.

Image

I am the worst terrorist the United States will ever face!


! Am OBAMA

Daily Quote 2.13.15


Well said!

johngalt's avatarYouViewed/Editorial

George Will

” The primary goal of collectivism — of socialism in Europe and contemporary liberalism in America — is to enlarge governmental supervision of individuals’ lives. This is done in the name of equality.   People are to be conscripted into one large cohort, everyone equal (although not equal in status or power to the governing class) in their status as wards of a self-aggrandizing government.”

View original post

Illegal Amnesty Is Drive For Permanent Democratic Majority


And there is little doubt that this loop hole will be put to good use by the Progressive Democrats!

johngalt's avatarYouViewed/Editorial

Obama Amnesty Creates Loophole For Illegal Immigrants To Vote In Elections

” President Obama’s temporary deportation amnesty will make it easier for illegal immigrants to improperly register and vote in elections, state elections officials testified to Congress on Thursday, saying that the driver’s licenses and Social Security numbers they will be granted create a major voting loophole.

  While stressing that it remains illegal for noncitizens to vote, secretaries of state from Ohio and Kansas said they won’t have the tools to sniff out illegal immigrants who register anyway, ignoring stiff penalties to fill out the registration forms that are easily available at shopping malls, motor vehicle bureaus and in curbside registration drives.

  Anyone registering to vote attests that he or she is a citizen, but Ohio Secretary of State Jon Husted said mass registration drives often aren’t able to give due attention to that part, and so illegal…

View original post 8 more words

IRS Admits They Will Pay Refunds To Illegal Aliens Who Never Paid Taxes….


WOW in a few years the illegal aliens will own the country!

States Increasingly Turning To Nullification To Combat Federal Overreach


Right now Nullification based on the tenth amendment is the only way to stop the federal governments unconstitutional power grab short of arrmed rebellion which need to be avoided at all costs!

johngalt's avatarYouViewed/Editorial

States Rise Up Against Washington

” State legislators around the country have introduced more than 200 bills aiming to nullify regulations and laws coming out of Washington, D.C., as they look to rein in the federal government.

  The legislative onslaught, which includes bills targeting federal restrictions on firearms, experimental treatments and hemp, reflects growing discord between the states and Washington, state officials say.

“ You have a choice,” said Kentucky state Rep. Diane St. Onge (R). “To sit back and not do anything or say anything and let overregulation continue — or you have the alternative choice to speak up about it and say, ‘We know what you are doing or intend to do and we do not think that it is constitutional and we as a state are not going to stand for it.’ ”

  Last month, St. Onge introduced H.B. 13 to nullify federal gun control…

View original post 140 more words

Political Correctness and the Last Man


By Paul Eidelberg

Those who say President Obama’s denial of “Islamic extremism” is mere “political correctness” are themselves guilty of “political correctness”; for to use that epithet to describe Obama is to use a euphemism for intellectual dishonesty.

Obama’s “political correctness” is nothing is less than flat out lying; but no journalist has the guts call Obama a liar.

Obama is not simply a fool, utterly ignorant of the truth. Nor is he simply stupid.  Perhaps he has been tongue-tied by moral relativism, which denies the existence of truth. But to accuse him of being “politically correct” is a double entendre, as if he transcends dichotomy of ignorance and stupidity.

Be this as it may, it’s Obama’s moral relativism that made him an “empty suit.” During his first presidential campaign he called himself a “cosmopolitan” – call him a man without a country. But inasmuch the United States is the most powerful country in the world, a cosmopolitan like Obama would want to strip this country of its worldwide influence, especially in relation to Obama’s origin, the Third World. This may explain both his bowing to Abdullah of Saudi Arabia, the spearhead of Sunni Islam, and his appeasement of Iran, the spearhead of Shiite Islam.

However, since Obama is a multicultural moral relativist, one may wonder how he can logically favor any ideology. But why should this “empty suit” be logically consistent?  Logical consistency would contradict Islamic theology, which posits the absolute and arbitrary Will of Islam’s deity, Allah. This is why Islamic theology rejects the Genesis concept of man’s creation in the image of God, which involves the primacy of Reason.

Enter the Taliban, the Muslims who believe that “reason stinks of corruption.” By rejecting reason, these guardians of the faith have no limits on what they may say or do.  This Islamic mentality is consistent with the refusal of Obama to denounce “radical” Islam or Islamic “extremism,” let alone as “evil.”

To associate Islam with evil would belie Obama’s moral relativism. It would also place in question his appointing to the Executive branch members of the Muslim Brotherhood.

Even more ominous, ponder his appointment of multiculturalists to the lifelong tenure of the American Supreme Court. This cannot but hasten the demise of America, of the Pax Americana, which saved Europe from Nazi and Communist totalitarianism, and which alone can save Western Civilization from Islamic totalitarianism.

This is not to suggest that Obama is animated by aggressive grandiose ambitions. He is no Hitler or Stalin or a Saladin.

He is indeed an empty suit, a politician history has belched out to display the decadence and final stage of Democratic Man. Ortega called this empty suit the “mass man.” Nietzsche called him the “Last Man,” a man devoid of any noble aspiration, of whom Flaubert said would make any man of taste want to vomit!

The trouble is that this vacuous human being, who harbors a hatred of Western Civilization, is shielding Iran, the spearhead of Islam. Iran’s acquisition of ballistic nuclear missiles would have grave implications for Israel and America, the two standards bearers of all that we cherish for ourselves and posterity.