Obama’s America

Many political analysis’s have already written about President Barack Hussein Obama’s, background and early life prior to his famous keynote speech at the 2004 Democratic convention which propelled him, four years later into the US Presidency in 2008; and made him the world’s most powerful man. Going from a total unknown to US President with no previous accomplishments except writing two books about himself, Dreams from My Father published in 1995 and The Audacity of Hope published in 2006, was unprecedented in US history and it has been attributed only to his being an educated articulate black man, and that must be true since his real background was hidden by the national media so they could say they helped make this historic event happen.   Knowing now what his background was and what he has done over the past 6 years its safe to say that if the 2008 voters had known his anti-American views that he never would have been elected

Obama campaigned on Hope and Change and that he would fundamentally change America; but he never said what the change would be and no one ever bothered to ask him what he really meant by that?

Those of us that dug into his background and saw problems with his views were concerned but anyone that did say anything and had a national voice was quickly demonized and branded a racist and dismissed because the only possible reason for not liking him was his color; but Obama was of two colors his mothers white and his father’s black, so which one didn’t they like? Having any black blood seemed to rule out every other color especially white I guess. But despite all the talk to the contrary his color was never an issue. It was a Red Herring; what was an issue was his anti-American views especially those of Marxism.

Since the 2008 election more has come out about his world views and, in fact two documentary movies were made by Dinesh D’Souza. The first in 2012 2016: Obama’s America and the second in 2014 America: Imagine the World Without Her. But these movies and all the rest were attacked by Obama’s administration and as a result everyone that tried to warn us was neutralized and Obama was elected a second time in 2012. This was somewhat of a surprise since his views for the country were now plain to see and they are of a country very different from what we now have. Those views are from the far left of the Democrat party which now call themselves the “progressives” and these views are based first on the 19th century works of Karl Marks than given more justification by Friedrich Nietzsche than implemented by Joseph Stalin, Adolf Hitter and Mao Zedong in different forms and lastly the system was refined by Saul Alinsky and Cloward–Piven in America into a sellable system to the uneducated.

Angelo M. Codevilla in his book The Ruling Class: How they Corrupted America and What We Can Do about It gives his views on how the progressive movement is taking us to a form of government much like a monarchy and this is exactly what Obama is doing. Jonathon Gruber also told us much the same thing, by mistake, when he allowed himself to be recorded when he told his audience that smart people like him could do things in politics because the American people were too stupid to understand what the elites like him were doing. His recordings were on ObamaCare but they were obviously generic views and would apply anywhere. Angelo M. Codevilla warned us and Jonathon Gruber told us they believed that only they were smart enough to rule us; self rule was not possible.

Without getting into details the green/environmental movement of the 70’s gave the progressives the message that they needed that was not linked to Marxism. The movement resulted in 1992 with UN Agenda 21 which couched its message as “sustainability” meaning in this context controlling carbon dioxide which is a requirement for life to even exist so the very context is flawed. UN Agenda 21 is now being implemented across America at the local level e.g. NOACA in Cleveland, Ohio with federal dollars.

To justify the governments views the government poured lots of grant money into research starting in the 90’s and since the researchers knew the results that were wanted they wrote their papers with the “right” message and were paid handsomely. I have personal knowledge of how this grant process works from a Fuel Cell project that I was involved with just after 9/11 with the Department of Defense (DOD) at the Harry Diamond laboratory in Maryland.

UN Agenda 21 gives almost total control of everything in society to the Federal Government and since the want-a-be ruling class wanted a large government to exist this movement was the ticket to everything they wanted. However, things rarely go as planned and this group of want-a-be rulers were ignorant of history and like what happened in the Russia Empire at the end of WW I in 1917 with the February Revolution and the Bolsheviks killed the Czar and all his family they themselves were then disposed and Joseph Stalin became the ruler or Tyrant to be more appropriate.

This kind of brutal take over of a country was in general accordance with the writing of Niccolo Machiavelli in his famous book The Prince. But there is more from the writings of Plato in his book The Republic when he thought there were only Five Forms of Regimes (government) possible which he identified as: Aristocracy, Timocracy, Oligarchy, Democracy and last in the sequence Tyranny. They were to fall in the order written here and Plato went into a long discussion on the how and why. We, in America, today have a Representative Republic and that is a form of a Democracy which always turns into Tyrannies when they fall, typically in 200 to 300 years.

The progressives, knowing that they wanted to change the American system of government, knew that they would have to change American’s belief that their system of government was the best one which is known as American Exceptionalism. The theory of the Exceptionalism of the U.S. can be traced to Alexis de Tocqueville, the first writer to describe the country as “exceptional” in 1831 and 1840. The change to this believe started when the ACLU was first formed by communists but the major changes were done by President Johnson in 1964/65 with his 84 major pieces of legislation called the Great Society. Johnson’s legislation gave the politicians the tools to create a range of new departments and agencies most after he left office from the Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) to the Department of Homeland Security, but one of the first the Department of Education in 1979 is what did the most damage as it gave the Federal Government the leverage to control what was taught from k-12 though a PhD.

That control has lead to Political Correctness, Hate Speech and multiculturalism which were used to change history and by doing so we have multiple America’s now ranging from white American, black America, Hispanic America, Muslim America, LGBT America, and female America to name just a few. There are more but you get the picture and what this has done is split the country into a host of factions that are all at odds with each other. A famous political writer in France Montesquieu wrote a book The Spirit of the laws where he basically stated that there can only be one form of government in a society and that if you want to change the form of the government you first need to change the sentiments of the people and that is why so much effort was put into the education system over the past 60 years.

This effort has now destroyed the belief in the American system of government and rewritten the history of the country into one of oppression rather than freedom. With the last two generations corrupted the change to a different supposed fairer system will not be hard and the start of this change is what Obama is all about, what those that want change have not learned from history is that change in any form always ends in a bloody revolution; which today would mean an internal second American Civil War. Based on current events the final push to make the changes they want will occur between 2015 and 2020 but more likely in the next two years before Obama is out of office.

There is justification in social theory for this Change of Obama’s, the most recent work on this subject was written by William Straus and Neil Howe in their book the Forth Turning published in 1997 which describes an upheaval in America which will end in either an internal or an external major war. Their theory is based on a reoccurring 80 to 90 year social pattern in Western Civilization where the last one was WW II which started in Asia in 1937 and Europe in 1939, add 80 to 1938 and you get 2018; however the cycles which go back to the Wars of the Roses in England fought between 1455 to 1487 have gotten shorter over the past 100 or so years. In any case the social turmoil that we are now in was predicted in the book back in 1997 going on 20 years ago. Obama is only doing what someone does every 80 to 90 years according to Straus and Howe.

What those that want to rule have always wanted is a Federal Government based on a single unelected (in practice) group of elites. This can take many forms from the past Monarchies to the present communist Central Committee. Both systems have the same exact method of rule where a single group of the citizens control all or almost all of the country’s social systems. No matter what the actual system the sovereign resides in the leader(s) of the group, committee or party and there are few to no limits placed on their power and no means to remove them from office. Today in America those that want the power or more correctly the sovereign need to find a way to consolidate their power and then change or get rid of the US constitution which places limits on what the Federal Government can do.

The following is one way the elites could consolidate power into a single party and then change the US constitution. There are progressives in both the Republican and Democratic parties and their views are not much different so if there would be enough of them that say in the US Senate of the 100 Senators there would be 60 Progressives 10 Democrats and 40 Republicans and in the House of Representatives of the 435 seats there would be 290 Progressives and 15 Democrats and 130 Republicans that would give the Progressives a 2/3’s majority in both houses which would mean that there is no law or Amendment to the US constitution that they could not propose and if they had the presidency as well the proposed Amendments could be easily adopted. James Madison the writer of the US constitution in Federalist 47 (old 46) warned us that if a faction controlled all three branches of the Federal Government that they could than do anything they wanted and that would be the very definition of a Tyranny. He hoped this would never happen.

An example of this almost happened in 2008 when Obama was elected since at the same time the Democrats /progressives had control of the House of Representatives and the US Senate and they passed the Affordable Care Act (ObamaCare) Public law 111-148 without a single Republican vote because Obama in his arrogance claimed he was the winner and the Republicans no longer mattered. Since the citizens didn’t want this Health Care change they rebelled and in the 2010 off year election the Democrats were swept out of the House of Representatives by a landside wave election created by the populist “Tea” Party.

Now continuing with what Obama wants, the selling of this concept of a new political party would not be easy so if there were a crises of sorts, real or made up, this faction of Progressives could conspire to reform the old Democratic Republican Party that existed form 1791 to 1825, almost to the American Civil War, which in the turmoil prior to that war the Democratic Republican Party basically spit into the present day Democratic and Republican Parties. Since this party had Thomas Jefferson, James Madison, James Monroe, John Quincy Adams and Andrew Jackson as its leaders this may not be that hard of a sell.

What this concept would do is create the illusion of a broad based center party by throwing out the “perceived” extremes like the radical left and the Tea Party right and making them meaningless distractions to the new American center party of the founders, the newly formed Democratic Republican Party. This could be accomplished by 2016 and if this new faction could get a president elected, which would seem likely, this faction would have total control of the country.

Could this be pulled off without a Civil War maybe but when the US Constitutional changes were proposed and possibly made, I think Civil War would be unavoidable. If Civil War ensued the result would be devastation and million could die in the conflict but those that want power don’t care as history has repeated shown going back thousands of years.

What is it that these power seekers want that they would destroy a country for? Well it’s an elusive dream that many want but few ever get and then when they do they find that they can’t keep it for very long.   What the Progressives like Obama and his friends like George Soros want is a system like China has with the Communist Central Committee of 205 full members and 171 alternate members and a tightly controlled private sector. You can see that it’s tightly control with only 205 people ruling a country of an estimated 1.36 billion people. What those in power don’t see is that the only reason that China grew so quickly wasn’t the Chinese government it was the American businesses moving everything that they had relating to production to China as quickly as they could to lower production costs. There isn’t much more other than natural resources left here that anyone wants so if American ends up in a Civil War it’s also possible that the country that is left becomes nothing but a source of raw materials and the impoverished Americans living in third world conditions.

How this plays out and what happens to America is basically in the Hands of the American officer Corps for they alone have the authority and means to prevent this take over from happening. This is so because In the Commissioned Officers Oath of Office are the words … (I) do solemnly swear (or affirm) that I will support and defend the Constitution of the United States against all enemies, foreign and domestic, that I will bear true faith and allegiance to the same; that I take this obligation freely, without any mental reservations or purpose of evasion; and that I will well and faithfully discharge the duties of the office upon which I am about to enter; So help me God. (DA Form 71, 1 August 1959, for officers.)

The interesting thing about this current oath is that it does not mention the president who is the Commander nor any other rank in the military. In essence each officer is obligated to personally defend the US Constitution; and in so doing he/she does not have to obey any orders from superiors, in fact, that obligation is specifically omitted. Why this is important is that if the US Constitution was not being followed by the President or the Congress the military could remove them from office and this would not be against their sworn duty. Nor would it be illegal since these officers have the ability to do so as they command the US Military this is a sacred duty given only to them.

The legal basis for this is found in the first law of the United States of America, enacted in the first session of the first Congress on 1 June 1789, and which was statute 1, chapter 1: an act to regulate the time and manner of administering certain oaths, which established the oath required by civil and military officials to support the Constitution. The founding fathers were very concerned about protecting our Constitution and their last line of defense when all else failed was the US Military which allowed the US Constitution to be put in place when the American revolution was successful and British were defeated on October 19, 1781 and the country was established.

In closing this is, of course, all speculation: however I have made a concerted effort since 9/11 to understand why our world is falling apart and so this paper is nothing but the extrapolation of what I have been studying for the past dozen years as I became more and more concerned over the countries near term future.

I would hope that the coming conflict is not as bad as the American Civil War or World War Two but since there are so many warring factions in the world today, and many have nuclear weapons, all we can hope for is that God will protect us from the worst of what might happen.

Lastly this work leaves much out as a full discussion would require a full book; so keeping this in mind please excuse this summary of my thoughts without full documented discussion and sourcing. However I have added a number of hyperlinks to this paper which should help with the documentation.