Armstrong Economics Blog/Disease Re-Posted Jan 5, 2021 by Martin Armstrong
There is a very serious problem going on, and there are lawyers filing suits in Europe against the development of the PCR test, which is seriously flawed and was never created with even a sample of COVID. The conflicts of interest in the creation of this test are well known, but of course, mainstream media will never publish a word about this issue.
The inventor of the PCR test, Kary Mullis, dates back to 1985 for which he was awarded the Nobel Prize in Chemistry in 1993. In 1996, John Lauritsen wrote about HIV and AIDS. Lauritsen at that time said that the PCR test identifies substances qualitatively not quantitatively, detecting the genetic sequences of viruses rather than the viruses themselves:
“PCR is intended to identify substances qualitatively, but by its very nature is unsuited for estimating numbers. Although there is a common misimpression that the viral load tests actually count the number of viruses in the blood, these tests cannot detect free, infectious viruses at all; they can only detect proteins that are believed, in some cases wrongly, to be unique to HIV. The tests can detect genetic sequences of viruses, but not viruses themselves.”
The PCR test has been used for COVID-19 but it detects the presence of the virus by amplifying the virus’s genetic material to a point where it can be detected by scientists. Even the NHS in Britain states that this test is a “fairly accurate indication of whether or not you are infected with coronavirus currently.” I myself was tested five times, and when I told that to the pulmonary expert I was told that didn’t mean anything because the test was not valid. There has been a case of one death following vaccination. There are people who will have serious reactions to vaccines and there should be more research to identify who is susceptible to such reactions. Instead, we have politicians trying to remove even religious objections. That is tyranny.
Here is a letter from Professor Dr. Thomas Aigner about the crisis in medicine surrounding this virus which has become so political. He is referring to a report that is being ignored which points out the conflicts of interest and politicians have destroyed the world economy for something which is clearly not well-founded. (see the report if link vanishes: Review report Corman-Drosten et al. Eurosurveillance 2020 – CORMAN-DROSTEN REVIEW REPORT)