COMMENT: I’ve noticed I slight welcomed change in people’s response to “the virus”. Less and less in my state, are wearing their masks. Ive begun to respond to others (mainly clerks) when they say ” be safe out there” . With ” Nah…not me. I’m taking some risks today” . Most the time I’m meet with some laughs. Once I removed my mask when saying it, and took a deep breath.
The only reason I bring this up. I feel we need to start taking these actions to help others break fears, and anxieties. In a way this seems to have helped in my small corner of the world. We can ALL do something. Even if it appears overwhelming at times.
SS
REPLY: Yes, if someone asks where is my mask, which is not mandatory to wear outside in Florida, I reply yes I’m sure I am risking my life with less than 10,000 dead from COVID along according to the CDC. But 10,000 out of 328 million I think the odds are in my favor.
Joe Biden has now come out and said that nobody would have died from the virus if Trump did his job. This is just unbelievable. When Trump closed travel from China Biden called him a racist. To even say something along these lines is just insane. His lack of mental capacity has even clouded his judgment on this subject. The real question remains: Who will be running the country under Joe Biden?
The Economist just ran a story that summarized the change in work that “people particularly fond of their pyjamas have for decades been arguing that a lot of work done in large shared offices could better be done at home. With covid-19 their ideas were put to the test in a huge if not randomised trial. The preliminary results are now in: yes, a lot of work can be done at home; and what is more, many people seem to prefer doing it there.”
The collapse in security in major cities such as New York have led to only 54% of companies expecting to return to New York City. In fact, only 8% of employees have returned to the office as of mid-August. Based upon a very RELIABLE source, the violence in the cities has been encouraged by Democrats for more than just trying to overthrow Trump. This has also been part of the agenda to end commuting by car to reduce CO2. They have deliberately sought to end commuting to save the planet. The problem has been that these Democratic mayors are ignorant of the real objective and think they are helping to just overthrow Trump. What they have failed to see is the bigger picture. People are fleeing the big cities and moving out to the suburbs. Real estate in the suburbs has risen in price while city properties are collapsing with no-bid.
The Editor of the London Financial Times sent out this letter:
It has been just over six months since London went into lockdown and the FT newsroom changed overnight from a bustling, crowded office to a dispersed, digital workplace. The Covid-19 pandemic has been an unparalleled test for organisations and governments around the world — and to all of us as parents, colleagues and friends. I hope the FT has passed this test by delivering the news, insight, analysis and intellectual stimulation you need to navigate this fast-changing world.
…
Looking ahead to the coming months, the FT aims to be your trusted guide to the new normal. We have passed through the first wave of the global crisis. Now, we face the new reality of living with the virus. Local and national outbreaks will continue to disrupt the fragile economic recovery. Crucial policy decisions on travel, employment support and stimulus occur with dizzying speed.
Indeed, the New Norm is intended to bring in the Great Reset whereby offices vanish, commuting comes to an end, and travel will be forever restricted. However, vital to pulling this off will remain social-distancing and masks. Why? This is being employed to combat civil unrest. It is also intended to separate the mindless sheep which obey whatever the government says which complies with Stanley Milgram’s studies on Obedience to Authority.
The Germans put on trial after World War II said they were just following orders. This inspired Milgram to investigate because many argued that the Germans were just different and could kill the Jews without remorse. At the Nuremberg Trials, those Germans simply said they were just following orders.
Stanley was perhaps the most important psychologists of all time as far as I am concerned. Instead of coming up with a theory, Stanley actually investigates and arrived at a conclusion nobody suspected was even possible. He hired actors to pretend to be shocked by a person whenever they lied. Stanley took random people off the street in the United States and elsewhere to see if the Germans were really a different species. Why he discovered was that people would shock others in a torture setting as long as they were told that was what they had to do.
Stanley concluded his studies which shocked the world. They were published in his book – Obedience to Authority. I bring this up now BECAUSE this is precisely what is being carried out today. We have people wearing masks when there is no serious pandemic and yelling at others who do not and some violently attacking people who do not have a mask.
What is being carried out is a well-defined psychological tactic because they instill fear in the mass herd of human sheep and then they count on the obedience of authority to control society. I have stated before, a friend of mine grew up behind the Berlin Wall. When the wall fell, his father went an got his Stasi file. He was shocked to discover everyone he thought was a friend was telling the government everything he had to say against the government. When he came home, my friend thought his father went mad. He began punching holes in the walls and ripping out microphones. Until his death, he refused to ever speak to anyone outside his immediate family.
This is the reasoning being the social-distancing and wearing masks. This (1) provides justification to arrest people who try to gather together to resist, and (2) as in France, they can put you in prison for 6 months for not wearing a mask or in Melbourne, Australia, attacking even women on the street who do not have a mask on. This is raw tyranny and how they are deliberately seeking to breakdown society to make the population controllable as was the case under Communism.
Field Marshall Hermann Wilhelm Göring (1893–1946)
“Why, of course, the people don’t want war. Why would some poor slob on a farm want to risk his life in a war when the best that he can get out of it is to come back to his farm in one piece. Naturally, the common people don’t want war; neither in Russia nor in England nor in America, nor for that matter in Germany. That is understood.
“But, after all, it is the leaders of the country who determine the policy and it is always a simple matter to drag the people along, whether it is a democracy or a fascist dictatorship or a Parliament or a Communist dictatorship.”
With respect to a Democracy they argued, the people have some say in the matter through their elected representatives, and in the United States, only Congress can declare wars.
Göring replied: “Oh, that is all well and good, but, voice or no voice, the people can always be brought to the bidding of the leaders. That is easy. All you have to do is tell them they are being attacked and denounce the pacifists for lack of patriotism and exposing the country to danger. It works the same way in any country.”
Welcome to the New Norm. These things are well defined. Once you understand what can be accomplished, then you can see their strategic plan. Since 1992, countries have signed on to Agenda 21 with the United States to inventory everything in the world along with the population. You MUST understand that there is this idea of a one-world government that would prevent wars. Here you have the former French Prime Minister bolding explaining this very idea was behind creating the Eurozone. They are seeking to do this globally and they have made their move here in 2020. This is not a conspiracy theory. I disagree that they will ever be able to pull it off. That does not mean those in power will not try.
Gates has been feeding into this agenda and seeks to push for digital currency so the Tech Companies will get a piece of every transaction in the world. He then is involved in food production and vaccines under the pretend of helping people when he is afraid of over-population.
The NEW NORM is less freedom if any remains. It will be more likely that you will need a permit to have a child as was the case with the one-child rule in China that failed.
This is a report from the Netherlands on the COVID HOAX. The report is entitled: “THE BIGGEST THREAT TO THE HUMAN SOCIETY IS THE DISCLAIMER OF HCQ”
There is something seriously wrong. This lockdown has been applied worldwide with far more devastating effects in their world countries. Take Peru for example. More than 40% of households in Peru do not have a refrigerator, according to a 2020 government survey. The vast majority of households do not even have the capacity that would allow them to stock up on food for many days. Add to that, Peru’s workforce in the informal/cash sector stands at about 70%, which is one of the highest rates in Latin America. One of the reasons why Bill Gates is doomed with his grand plan, only about 38% of Peruvian adults have a bank account, making digital payments largely impossible.
The Peruvian government did allocate up to 12% of its GDP to help people who lost their jobs and companies that lost income because of the lockdown measures. While the government’s economic package was widely praised, based on sources there as of yesterday, they are only allowed out of their homes for food or a medical emergency. In Peru, police blockaded a highway and launched tear gas into crowds attempting to flee Lima during the lockdown (see Guardian). The government even banned family gatherings (see US News & World Report.)
The question becomes: how will politicians respond as there is a rising wealth of evidence that this is nowhere near as serious to warrant what has been done? We really need to know if politicians took bribes to pull this off for the Great Reset, or were they acting out of stupidity because everyone else was locking down. We are preparing a report on this subject. The diverse world economy certainly does not make this a one-solution-for-all fit very well.
I seriously doubt that people realize the extent of the economic damage caused by this HOAX instigated but a group of Oligarchs & Academics frunk on their own power and ignorance of how the real world even functions. When you shake hands with someone, you get a sense of their character or lack thereof by the look in their eyes. When I met Kalus Schwab of the World Economic Forum, my impression was clearly one of academic arrogance. The people behind this bold attempt to alter the world economy do not fraternize with the little people they consider the great unwashed.
Even CNN now admits the “[a]bout 60% of businesses that have closed during the coronavirus pandemic will never reopen, and restaurants have suffered the most, according to new data from Yelp.” in the meantime, we have a similar arrogance among market pundits who think a vaccine will save the economy and everything will recover as if nothing ever took place. What has been unleashed with masks and social distancing will leave a stain in the minds of so many who will forever look at others as a threat to their life transporting some disease.
I have stated many times that in all my research, there is a cycle to the rise and fall of civilizations. The rise when it is beneficial for everyone to come together. You no longer have to bake bread because a baker is there which frees you to do things that you are good at. Civilizations collapse when they (1) turn against their people, and (2) allow one class to oppress another. This is why Marxism is so dangerous. The more we move toward a socialist state means the state must suppress those that produce. Civilization no longer provides equal protection and thus it has lost its benefit for all (see How Empires Die).
The economic damage has undermined Western society and our economy. There will be no miracle recovery. We have lost decades of economic advancement. Small businesses have been devastated and these lockdowns have harmed the lower economic classes who mostly provided physical labor from cutting hair to driving trucks. These were the people who could not earn income from being locked down working from home. There has been a profound blow to the lower economic classes and the losses of savings for those who operated their small businesses are profound. Banks decline over 70% of loans for small businesses. That may now exceed 90%.
There are rumors now running around that more lockdowns are coming in Canada. I cannot verify that this is correct, but this twitter that is going viral does put it correctly, this is now becoming the people v the establishment which seems to be controlled by the Oligarchs. We will see if Canada goes in this direction.
A U of W doctoral candidate questions the legitimacy of early covid-19 mortality projections, and by extension, the justification of all COVID-19 policy
APJ Media report presents the case of University of Waterloo doctoral candidate in epidemiology, Ronald B. Brown, who concluded that there was a “math error” injected into the early COVID-19 death models that caused them to overestimate projected mortality totals.
This fact could impact the political justification of all COVID-19 policy because the data’s legitimacy is inversely proportional to the size of the “math error”. Put another way, information’s decision-making value falls as its level of error grows, and vice versa. Bad data equals bad decisions.
Mr. Brown determined that the mortality rate calculations were in error by a factor of 10, or 1000%, due to the conflation of case fatality rate (CFR) with an infection fatality rate (IFR) estimated to be ten times as large. A severe error, but not without issues. First, is the error large enough to delegitimize COVID-19 lockdown decisions, and, more importantly, how accurate is the estimated “math error”?
Considering the incalculable financial, psychological, and spiritual damage already done to millions, plus new, possibly mistaken, concerns over a rise in COVID-19 cases, citizens deserve to know if the data leaders use is accurate and reliable enough to justify further political action.
Calculating Actual COVID-19 Delusion Factors
As terrible as Brown’s conflation error is, it remains an estimate because the CFR and IFR numbers were themselves, estimates. Obviously, early models were data-challenged and had no choice but to produce ridiculous projections. Remember, these erroneous results were crucial factors in the political decision-making process and as COVID-19 policy was brutal, it’s fair to ask for proper justification.
Thankfully, we can calculate a more realistic COVID-19 delusion factor by comparing the actual number of COVID-19 deaths with the model projections used to drive policy choices. The key to getting an accurate understanding of whether political action was justified or not requires accurate COVID-19 death counts and knowing the projected death numbers political leaders relied on.
For example, this early April CBC article reported Ontario provincial health experts expected COVID-19 to kill between 3,000 and 15,000 Ontarians. (Oddly, these estimates are strangely referred to as “revelations”.) It’s possible these numbers influenced Ontario Premier Doug Ford, so, how accurate would they have been?
As of September 15, 2020, worldometers showed Canada’s COVID-19 death total at 9,179. Extrapolating based on population; Ontario’s 15,000 figure is equivalent to 38,744 Canadian deaths.
This represents a COVID-19 delusion factor (projection/actual) of 4.22, or, a substantial 422%.
In that same article, however, they justify drastic political action on the idea that it prevented Ontario’s COVID-19 death toll from hitting 100,000. This would equate to 258,294 Canadians, which explodes the political delusion factor to 28, or 2800%. The argument that totalitarian action lowered the number of deaths is, thanks to RealClimateScience, [ ] proven false by looking at Sweden’s non-lockdown experience.
Some Saskatchewan projections were even worse. This CBC article suggested up to 15,000 could die in the sparsely populated province, which equates to a Canadian total of 479,036 COVID-19 deaths.
The delusion factor here is a nerve wracking 52, or 5228%. Scary enough, but this article also suggested Saskatchewan was still unprepared to combat the virus and that the health system would be overwhelmed even using “conservative” assumptions. Did that happen?
The Saskatchewan government noted that “more accurate modelling is anticipated in the coming days” and that “Even if there was a 50 percent error rate, we still need to do this.” So, an admittance they’re simply guessing and, chillingly, the belief it’s acceptable to make life-altering decisions on data that is wrong half the time. This is panic, not logic, speaking.
The next number comes from Wikipedia where they report a worst-case scenario whereby 300,000 Ontarians would fall to the COVID-19 reaper. The worst-case delusion factor here is stroke inducing, 85, or 8500%. Was Premier Ford influenced by worst-case models? His actions suggest the possibility.
The following graph, also found in the RealClimateScience video linked above, provides a clear view of the difference between actuals and model projections. Does it make sense to base decisions on wildly incorrect projections because that is exactly what political leadership has done and wish to continue.
“Number of Cases” is another “conflation” deceit
The current concern, expressed by the media and certain political leaders, is the rising “number of cases”. However, missing from that conversation is the fact that COVID-19 has lost its Death Punch, meaning there is no direct correlation between COVID-19 cases and deaths, as if viruses have a “life cycle” of their own.
Ask yourself how dangerous COVID-19 still is after reviewing this chart showing new deaths per day in Canada.
COVID-19’s death rate has flatlined! This same chart shape can be found the world over, including in the UK, Italy, France, Belgium, and Sweden, who didn’t lock down.
Can Canadians Handle The COVID-19 Truth?
Ask yourself how many Canadians would be convinced of the need to mask up or lock down if they understood that number of cases does not equate to number of deaths. Now, ask yourself why the media and premiers would insist on conflating the two.
We can conclude the following.
Poor models led to delusional political choices and disastrous consequences.
The focus on “cases” rather than deaths is a deliberate decision shared by the media and most politicians.
Conflation is a deceitful tactic whose use is to JUSTIFY, not prove the need for, government action both past and present.
The horrific consequences of COVID-19 political policy are both known, and by pushing deceit, desired by the media and political leaders. Sad, but true.
We know they messed up and they know they messed up, HUGE! They just don’t want you to know they know, which allows them to avoid accountability and continue down their illegitimate course.
Both “number of cases” and the flatlined death rate are “true”. However, only one represents truth and common sense says it isn’t the position backed by contemptuous deceit.
The probability that Elvis is alive is as great as the probability the COVID-19 lockdown is legitimate
Quebec Premier Francois Legault mocked mask deniers by equating them to conspiracy theorists who believe Elvis still roams Graceland. Considering how delusional Saskatchewan and Ontario projections were, and how misleading it is to focus on “cases”, the probability that COVID-19 justifications were predicated on accurate projections is ZERO.
Elvis will remain alive and in the building until politicians legitimize their actions by unmasking their delusional data.
Prediction
The unmasking of provincial COVID-19 delusions will show a direct relationship between the scale of the delusion and the severity of political restrictions that followed.
Mark Gray — Bio and ArchivesMark Gray hails from the Kirkland Lake, Ontario area and has spent over 30 years as an Analyst/Developer in Big IT, mostly in Calgary’s Oil-And-Gas Sector. Creator of an non-partisan, analytical methodology that seeks out and identifies Bias and Deceit embedded in weaponized information.
In a stunning segment on Tucker Carlson tonight, Chinese virologist Dr. Li-Meng Yan explains how China actually manufactured the COVID-19 virus by weaponizing and modifying the genetic sequence within the China bat virus.
According to Dr. Li-Meng Yan the virus was specifically created and released by China.
I have created this site to help people have fun in the kitchen. I write about enjoying life both in and out of my kitchen. Life is short! Make the most of it and enjoy!
This is a library of News Events not reported by the Main Stream Media documenting & connecting the dots on How the Obama Marxist Liberal agenda is destroying America
Centinel2012 