Republican Grover Norquist has connections to the Muslim Brotherhood!


KNOW this: if not for the fact that RINOS’s are in collusion with Islamic forces, much of HUSSEIN Obama’s Brotherhood infiltration and penetration could have been stopped. This is a fact.

BUT to understand where the onus lies, one must be willing to hold the so-called Repub leadership to account. Otherwise, just roll over and be done with it.

SHEEP’S in wolves clothing…


(Grover Norquist is a co-founder of a Muslim Brotherhood front group, the Islamic Free Market Institute!)

IT has been reported at these pages, on a multiplicity of occasions, that there are more than a few Islamic foxes in the Repub power base. But when one adds them to the laundry list in the Demster column the waters become very muddy. Indeed, some are “sympathizers” inside Congress, while others act as lobbyists, etc.  Well paid whores.

THE fact is that some deserve a higher profile than others, although the list keeps growing. That’s just the way it is. Consider:

HOW corrosive is it when the actual House Intelligence Chair, Repub Rep. Mike Rogers – tasked to investigate Benghazigate – has a sordid nexus to the Muslim Brotherhood Mafia? Say what?

Those of us who are anticipating a measure of (long overdue) justic…

At the very least, is it too much to expect that a man of honor sits at the head of said committee, a leader who is capable of discerning justice? Asked and answered.

Alas, this is not the case, even though (Repub) Rep. Rogers was a former FBI Special Agent and should be able to smell the jihad. This blogger has more than a nose for their scents, therefore he has zero excuse. Zip and zilch. Agreed?

Nevertheless, like many Congressional reps, in tandem with other powerful players in tow, Rogers turns deaf, dumb and blind and plays footsie, even to the point of accepting a keynote address at a mobbed up Brotherhood event! Readers, it doesn’t even matter why. What is intrinsic is he in their pockets, one way or another.

Now, as dangerous as it is for any Congressional Rep. to be in bed with Islamists, expecting them to decouple is akin to whistling in the wind….removing pigs from their s*** is more likely. It ain’t gonna happen. Fruitless.

However, it’s an order of greater magnitude when the Chairman of the House Intelligence committee is cozy, currying favor, with the likes of those who “hob nob” with Islamists, Muslim-American (non-American too) leaders covering for Benghazigate terrorists. Can you imagine such Congressional conflict of interest, perhaps leading to treason? Indeed. Islamic foxes deep inside the hen house. Burrowed…

MOREOVER, another closer than close Muslim Brotherhood apologist/sympathizer is none other than (never gonna retire) Sen. McCain.

AND lest anyone thought otherwise, Sen. McCain assisted ISIS’s rise into top dog status, therefore, their bloody swathe across the Mid East lands at his feet too. Yes, it does.MORE specifically, McCain’s admitted alliance/support to the so-called “rebels”, those who have pledged their allegiance to ISIS, cannot be overstated. Overlooked…
NOW that the above snakes in the grass have been identified, let’s turn our attention to one who is even more insidious, as he works the aisle as a mega power broker/deal maker, though never having been elected.
Enter, Grover Norquist, U.S. born and bred, Harvard educated (what a shock…) and married to a “Palestinian”. Quaint.

NOW, for sundry reasons he debuted (several times) at this site, yet, the following analysis was most notable:

And, anyone foolish enough to believe that the RINO leadership will come to their rescue, well, good luck with that fantasy land meandering: Republican National Convention Heralded “Arab Spring” In Its Platform, Oblivious To The Unfolding Arab/Muslim Nightmare!
More specifically, between House Leader Rep Boehner, an addled bonehead and booze hound, and Repub political operative Grover Norquist, himself an Islamist, who exactly are Conservatives expecting to sound the (sleeper) alarms?…..(continue reading)

 

NEVERTHELESS, Norquist’s pet projects – entry tickets into his anti-American mischief, F/B/O the Muslim Brotherhood Mafia – ala Islamic infiltration and penetration are conducted under the guise of two umbrellas.

ONE trajectory is via his status as president ofAmericans for Tax Reform, an organization that opposes tax increases. Well and good. In fact, it is a conservative principle which rallies around limited gov’t, etc. He understands the conservative economic base, and also how to theoretically drag along clueless Repubs. Demsters, on the other hand, are not the ones who need incentives toward the Islamic “way of thinking.”

HIS second thrust lies within being a co-founder of theIslamic Free Market Institute.

YET, to understand how deeply implicated Repubs are with the Muslim Brotherhood Mafia, is to follow the trail of Norquist and his influence peddling, both within the White House and every major power center in the Beltway.

In 1996, President Clinton won the Muslim-American vote, a growing minority that the Republican Party saw as an opportunity.

Two years later, Alamoudi dispatched his closest aide, Khaled Saffuri, to team up with an extremely influential Republican activist named Grover Norquist to form the Islamic Free Market Institute. He has been called the “most powerful man in America” because of his ability to make Republican congressmen and candidates bend to his anti-tax platform. Suhail Khan also joined as chairman and a board member.

Saffuri had personal ties of his own to the Brotherhood lobby beyond Alamoudi. He has worked with Jamal Barzinji, one of the main founders of the network, since 1988. The FBI’s source around that time mentioned Barzinji by name as aMuslim Brotherhood operative trying to influence U.S. policy.

He remains a senior IIIT official and his home was raided in 2003 as part of a terrorism investigation. Special Agent David Kane said Barzinji “is not only closely associated with PIJ [Palestinian Islamic Jihad]…but also with Hamas.”

The evidence suggests that Norquist’s passion was triggered by a personal conversion to Islam. His wife, Samah, is a devout Muslim. In 2008, they adopted a Palestinian baby from Bethlehem. When asked by author Paul Sperry if he converted, Norquist dodged the question by saying it is “personal”…(read the whole thing!!)

IN this regard the evidence keeps piling up…double agent and more…

The already alarming connections of Americans for Tax Reform (ATR) President Grover Norquist to Islamic terrorism have both come into sharper focus and gotten even more alarming. In an expose’ by Lee Stranahan, it’s revealed that being married to a Palestinian Muslim wife isn’t Norquist’s only connection to Islam through his family. In fact, the other connection appears to have come years earlier and may be far more consequential to American history (more on that at end of post).

Khaled Saffuri (left arrow) and CAIR Exec Director Nihad Awad (right arrow) with George W. Bush on 9/17/01
Norquist reportedly married his wife Samah Alrayyes in 2004. However, 1998 is a key year when digging into his nefarious dealings. The timing of those two events could suggest that Norquist was running in Islamic activist circles years before he met his wife. He founded the Islamic Institute with a man named Khaled Saffuri in 1998. In the year of ATR’s founding in 1985, Norquist’s sister Loraine graduated with an MBA from Harvard. Sometime thereafter, she married a Muslim man named Majed Tomeh, who also received a Harvard MBA. This provides us with a window in time (1985-1998) when something happened that would prompt Grover to partner with Saffuri.

What Stranahan has discovered is that Saffuri wasn’t the only Islamic Institute co-founder; Norquist’s brother-in-law Tomeh was too:

Why has Majed Tomeh never been mentioned by Grover Norquist as a co-founder of the Islamic Institute?

That’s a question that becomes much more interesting when you learn that Majed Tomeh is also Grover Norquist’s brother-in-law, who was married to Norquist’s sister years prior to the founding the Islamic Institute in 1998. That means the unrevealed connection between Norquist and Palestinian Anti-Israel activism goes much deeper than anyone had suspected.

Stranahan also links to a 1999 petition signed by Tomeh that expressed a Hamas-friendly position against the Palestinian Authority and then in 2009, Tomeh was a signatory to another letter that supported the position of Hamas leader Ismail Haniyeh.

As Shoebat.com has reported, Saffuri was once the deputy of a man namedAbdurahman Alamoudi, who founded the Boston Mosque attended by the Boston Marathon bombers and was arrested on terrorism charges in 2003. One year later, Alamoudi was sentenced to more than 20 years. In 1999, Alamoudi cut two $10,000 checks to the Islamic Institute founded by Norquist, Saffuri and Tomeh:

Checks written to Norquist's Institute (photo via Sperry files)
Two months after the Boston Marathon bombing, FBI Director Robert Mueller, who began his tenure one week prior to the 9/11 attacks, was asked by Rep. Louie Gohmert (R-TX) at a House Judiciary Committee hearing if he knew that Alamoudi founded the mosque in question. More shocking than Alamoudi’s connection to that mosque was the response of Mueller – on whose watch Alamoudi was convicted – to that question:

Speaking of mosques, perhaps the most notorious one in the United States is Dar al-Hijrah, located in Falls Church, VA. At the time of the Islamic Institute’s founding, a man named Bassam Estwani was the Chairman of that mosque. As Shoebat.comhas reported, Estwani was once a very powerful mover and shaker within American politics, dating back to as far as 1995 when he began visiting the White House. Less than one year prior to the 9/11 attacks, Estwani’s Congressman, Rep. Thomas M. Davis (R-VA) was able to get him a gig on the floor of the U.S. House of Representatives, delivering a prayer:

.

Dar al-Hijrah mosque chairman Estwani delivers prayer on House floor on February 7, 2001.
In a photo taken around the time of the Islamic Institute’s founding, Estwani can be seen with none other than Saffuri, Alamoudi and U.S. Congressman Jim Moran(D-VA). Norquist’s sister had been married to Tomeh for years by then.

Alamoudi (back left), Moran, Estwani, and Saffuri (man in front on far left unidentified).
At the time of the 9/11 attacks, none other than Anwar al-Awlaki – inspiration for Fort Hood jihadist Nidal Malik Hasan – was the Imam at Dar al-Hijrah; three of the 9/11 hijackers visited the mosque. This actually prompted the FBI to track al-Awlaki afterward, as Shoebat.com reported. Unfortunately, Estwani was not only ignored; he continued to rub elbows with powerful politicians for years.

Estwani (center) flanked by Senator John Warner (L) and Rep. Davis (R) more than one year after 9/11.
Rep. Moran (L), Estwani (C) and Rep. Davis (R) circa 2006.
As Bush was meeting with the likes of Saffuri and Alamoudi in the Texas Governor’s Mansion, Estwani was meeting with Bill Clinton in the Oval Office:

Estwani meeting with Bill Clinton in Oval Office
Another key figure in all this is a man named Suhail Khan, who was a George W. Bush administration adviser. It was Norquist who lobbied hard on behalf of Khan getting that job. Khan’s father was an early founder of Muslim Brotherhood front groups in the U.S. According to an article written in the weeks after 9/11, it was Norquist and Saffuri who brokered a meeting between Muslim leaders and Rep. Tom Davis (Estwani’s congressman). After that meeting, Saffuri’s trips to the White House became a regular occurrence. Khan once served on the Islamic Institute’s Board.

image: http://shoebat.com/wp-content/uploads/2013/10/Khan_Norquist-…

Suhail Khan and Grover Norquist at CPAC in 2011.
As Shoebat.com has reported, there was no figure more significant than Norquist when it came to bringing the George W. Bush White House and the leaders of Muslim Brotherhood front groups together both before and AFTER 9/11. When Bush was still in the Texas Governor’s mansion, he welcomed a Muslim delegation that included Saffuri and Alamoudi. Close Bush advisor Karl Rove was seen carrying a book penned by an author with deep connections to the Brotherhood.

image: http://shoebat.com/wp-content/uploads/2014/03/Alamoudi_Bush_…

Alamoudi (far left) and Saffuri (over Bush's left shoulder) circa 2000. Rove holding Muslim Brotherhood-friendly book.
Here is a photo of what appears to be the same room inside the Governor’s Mansion, via the official website (note position of clock, mirror and drapes):

image: http://shoebat.com/wp-content/uploads/2015/02/Tx_Gov_Mansion…

(Photo via Texas Governor's Mansion website)
In June of 2001, Alamoudi presented Khan with an award. While introducing Khan, Alamoudi proclaimed ‘Allahu Akbar’ after mentioning that Khan had been in the White House earlier that day and one day might be Vice President, ‘Inshallah’ (Allah willing):

Suhail Khan receives award from top Al-Qaeda fundraiser Alamoudi on… from SuhailKhan Exposed on Vimeo.

It’s clear that after Bush was elected president, the practice of Rove giving Norquist and his Muslim buddies access to the President’s mansion (White House) continued. Unbeknownst to most, an article written by the New Republic’s Franklin Foer two months after 9/11 would serve as the quintessential journalistic time bomb. Here are two very relevant paragraphs:

On the afternoon of September 26, George W. Bush gathered 15 prominent Muslim- and Arab-Americans at the White House.With cameras rolling, the president proclaimed that “the teachings of Islam are teachings of peace and good.” It was a critically important moment, a statement to the world that America’s Muslim leaders unambiguously reject the terror committed in Islam’s name.

To the president’s left sat Dr. Yahya Basha, president of the American Muslim Council, an organization whose leaders have repeatedly called Hamas “freedom fighters.” Also in attendance was Salam Al-Marayati, executive director of the Muslim Public Affairs Council, who on the afternoon of September 11 told a Los Angeles public radio audience that “we should put the State of Israel on the suspect list.” And sitting right next to President Bush was Muzammil Siddiqi, president of the Islamic Society of North America, who last fall told a Washington crowd chanting pro-Hezbollah slogans, “America has to learn if you remain on the side of injustice, the wrath of God will come.” Days later, after a conservative activist confronted Karl Rove with dossiers about some of Bush’s new friends, Rove replied, according to the activist, “I wish I had known before the event took place.”

Rove didn’t know? Norquist’s access to the White House should have been terminated; it was not. That fact demonstrates Rove absolutely did know.

If you’re still not convinced, consider news relayed by Shoebat.com in 2013 that Norquist’s ATR received more money from Rove’s SuperPAC than anyone else did:

Tax documents from Karl Rove’s Crossroads GPS show that Grover Norquist’s Americans for Tax Reform (ATR) is largely funded by Rove, ProPublica’s Kim Barker reports…

…On its 2012 tax return, Barker reported, the biggest grant Rove’s Crossroads GPS gave to anybody was a $26.4 million grant it gave to Norquist’s ATR for “social welfare.”

In Foer’s article, one of the Muslim leaders Norquist helped inside the Oval Office on September 26, 2001 was a man named Dr. Yahya Basha. Basha is listed with… wait for it… Bassam Estwani on the Board of Directors of the Syrian Emergency Task Force (SETF), a group with connections to the Muslim Brotherhood and that seeks to aid in the overthrow of Bashar al-Assad in Syria.

When Elizabeth O’Bagy, the Political Director for SETF was caught hiding a significant conflict of interest after Senator John McCain cited her Wall Street Journal article in a Senate Committee hearing in an effort to push the shared agenda of regime change in Syria, the SETF website began the process of digital document shredding. O’Bagy, however, landed safely in the arms of McCain as a legislative assistant,as Shoebat.com reported.
In the wake of McCain’s endorsement of O’Bagy in a Senate hearing, Fox News Channel’s Neil Cavuto interviewed O’Bagy before she was jettisoned by the SETF;it didn’t go well for McCain’s future employee:

http://video.foxnews.com/v/video-embed.html?video_id=2652116150001&…

Shoebat.com also pointed out that it was Karl Rove who signed on to a letter addressed to Barack Obama at about the same time, urging the President to launch a bombing campaign against Assad.

Thanks to Stranahan’s find, Norquist’s connections to Islam are traced back further than they have been before with the discovery of his connection to Tomeh, which dates back to circa 1985. As such, Norquist helped to dirty up both the Clinton and Bush administrations. Alamoudi worked for the U.S. State Department in varying capacities from 1992-2001. It’s true that the bulk of that time was during the Clinton administration but George H.W. Bush was President in 1992 and his son George W. in 2001.

An interesting question to ponder: Did any of these relationships play a role in the Bush administration’s decision to pressure Israel to pull out of Gaza and hand control over to Hamas?

As if all that wasn’t bad enough, it all leads us to conclude that Norquist has been a key player in a 30-year Muslim Brotherhood plan in America that commenced in 1990, as Shoebat.com first revealed.

NOW, whether coming from Repub infiltrators, or from the likes of a Jihadi-in-Chief, the fact remains that both are equally dangerous. Thus, while HUSSEINObama’s fingerprints are all over the Brotherhood, one can surely find similar infiltration across the aisle – inside and outside Congress.

TRAITORS, regardless of their political garb, must be held to account…whatever it takes…bring them down. Crashing!

Read more at http://joeforamerica.com/2015/02/islamic-double-agent-repub-power-b…

NRA launches ethics investigation into Grover Norquist

On Wednesday’s radio program, Frank Gaffney, founder of the Center for Security Policy, alleged that Grover Norquist was acting as an agent of influence on behalf of the Muslim Brotherhood.
Norquist is currently up for re-election to the board of the NRA, and Glenn said he had heard enough bad things about Norquist that he was going to drop his membership if the re-election was a success.
Friday morning, Glenn revealed that he had spoken with Wayne LaPierre, executive vice president of the NRA, and the NRA was opening an ethics investigation in Norquist.
Related: Below is a rush transcript of this segment from radio:
Laura J Alcorn

Let’s
 Invite More to our social network.
 
Send these post to your email groups and friends.
Like us on
 Facebook and follow us on 
twitter

Visit America Conservative 2 Conservative at: http://americac2c.com/?xg_source=msg_mes_network

Judge Jeanine Pirro Opening Statement – Does H Clinton Have The Integrity To Be President Of U.S.A?


Navy Chaplain Removed From Unit for Teaching ‘Biblical Truth’ on Sexuality


There is no way you can be a Christian Chaplin in today’s military and also be true to the teaching of Christ!

MY PERSONAL SERVER…


I wish I had a personal server … lol

Obama’s odd series of exaggerated gun claims


Well may comment is based on past history so whether this is true or not would depend on your definition of what a “Gun” is (there are 1911A1’s and the are squirt guns) and what your definition of a “Fresh” Vegetable is (there are vegetables that have just been picked and vegetables that are transported and processed). And there always is that it depends on what your definition of “is” is.

deacon303's avatarWhiskey Tango Foxtrot

“It’s easier for you to buy a handgun and clips than it is for you to buy a fresh vegetable’

This is just a very strange comment that appears to have no statistical basis. Perhaps one can just shrug it off as hyperbole, but is this really something the president of the United States should say to college students? As far as we know, there are no areas in the United States where background checks are needed to buy vegetables.

Obama-liar-in-chiefUpdate: Some readers have suggested the president was actually referring the U.S. Department of Agriculture’s “food desert” locator, which shows areas of the countries in which it is difficult to buy fresh vegetables. That’s an interesting interpretation that puts the president’s comment in a different light. Not all gun sales require background checks, we should note. For what it is worth, the White House declined to provide an explanation for…

View original post 361 more words

(IF YOU LOOK UP THE WORD TRAITOR IN THE DICTIONARY IT SAYS “SEE JOHN KERRY’.) OUCH! What Obama’s Flip-Flopping State Sec’y Just Told The Senate Is An Embarrassment


What can you say this entire situation was created by Obama, Hillary and Kerry none of which are known to be very smart; dispite all the media attempts to make them sound otherwise!.

The Greening of a High Tech Third World Nation


By Prof. Paul Eidelberg

Wise Americans have called Barack Obama not only a “Post-American” President, but also a “Third World” President. This disparagement should be taken seriously, and that’s the basic intention of the present article, which transcends politics even though it focuses on the pathetic but strutting character of Barack Obama.

If you have a President as ignorant and as arrogant as Mr. Obama, and if he enjoys some support among Democrats in Congress, he is bound to say anddo things that contradict Americas two foundational documents, the Declaration of Independence and the Federal Constitution.

Since these documents embody the Principle of Limited Government and the related System of Institutional Checks and Balances, it’s time for some Senator, or some member of the House of Representatives, to address the public and enumerate the many times President Barack Obama has displayed ignorance as well as arrogance regarding these sacred documents. And it would be wise and most timely if this Senator or Representative is serving, respectively, in the Senate or in the House Judiciary Committee.

Of course, by exposing statements and/or acts of Mr. Obama that disparage him politically, and that may possibly incriminate him legally, the public may call for his impeachment, and this may result in violent urban repercussions that would make the recent riots in Ferguson appear mild by comparison.  Hence, some other lawful way should be formulated to render Mr. Obama innocuous.

Whatever method is chosen, it should serve to educate the American people about the principle of Limited Government and how this principle is fleshed out by our system of institutional checks and balances.  The public will then learn how this system was designed to minimize the danger that an ignorant or an arrogant President might abuse the powers of the Executive Branch, and thus violate the Rule of Law, a foundation stone of civilized society. The Obama Administration has been lax on this law by its turning a blind eye toward Muslim organizations whose creed is not very civilized.

It should also be emphasized, however, that the ignorance and arrogance manifested by the Obama Administration is not only a consequence of Mr. Obama’s post-American, Third World leanings. His leanings reflect a century-long evolution of nihilism in American higher education. This nihilism,  better known as moral relativism, has filtered down and stultified countless citizens of this now sexually indiscriminate country to the extent of transforming high tech America into a morally lax or semi-third world nation!

Christopher Hitchens Vs Frank Turek Debate Atheism or Theism


The Video is 2 hours long but if you are interested in this subject its a good one to get both sides from, BTW just for the record I am on the side of Theism.

Jobs Don’t Exist So That You Can Support Your Family


Image by The All-Nite Images on FlickrI hear this argument all the time when discussing Minimum Wage laws: “How is a person supposed to survive, making X dollars an hour?” The answer, of course is, you’re not. The idea that every single job should pay enough to support a person and his whole family, is ludicrous. Think about the last time you paid someone to do a job for you; a plumber, landscaper, painter, or whatever. Did you come to an agreement on the price based on how much money the worker needed in order to pay his bills, or did you pay him or her based on the job performed?

Some jobs pay more than others because they are simply more valuable to the person who is paying. As consumers, we love choices. We sometimes choose to buy lesser quality goods to save a little money. Sometimes, we choose more expensive goods because we find them to be worth the money. But somehow, this gets lost on those who think even the simplest jobs that require no skills at all, should have some minimum price arbitrarily set by the government.

What is a job anyway? You may use your job as your source of income in order to support yourself and your family, but this isn’t the reason for its existence. A job is something that needs to be done. Someone needs something done and is willing to pay for it because having the job performed by someone else is worth more to that person than the money he is giving up. And the person who voluntarily accepts a job offer has determined that the money he or she will receive is worth more than the time and effort required to perform the job. If both sides didn’t feel they were better off by entering into the agreement, no agreement would ever take place. It isn’t one-sided as many would have us believe.

If you subscribe to the notion that society owes you a job that pays a certain amount, then why aren’t you contributing by hiring someone to do your dishes for you, just so you can help someone pay their bills? Maybe because it’s not worth it for you to pay someone to do your dishes? What if I told you that not only must you hire someone to do them, but you also should pay that person a “liveable” wage? When people claim to have a right to a job or a right to a minimum wage, they always forget that someone else needs to be forced to provide that so called “right.”

If you can’t make enough money doing a particular job, then you need to be doing a different kind of job, one that is more valuable. This may sound harsh, but it is also economics and common sense.

“But these companies are just so greedy! They always want to pay you less.” Umm, yeah, and employees always want to earn more, those greedy bastards. Somehow, the vast majority of jobs pay more than the minimum wage set by the government. Have you ever wondered why that is? Employers are greedy. They don’t want to pay more, but somehow they do. Who is forcing these evil people to do this against their will, if it isn’t the almighty government? Could it be that those jobs are actually that much more valuable to employers than minimum wage jobs? Could it be that if they refuse to pay more, they could lose employees to their competitors? That couldn’t be, could it? Because what we are told is that if the government didn’t step in, these evil corporations would have us all working for nothing and we would have no choice in the matter.

Jobs that require little skill and are therefore, not as valuable to employers actually serve a great purpose for students and those with little or no education. It allows them to gain some of the basic skills necessary so that they can become more valuable, and earn more as a result. If you want people to earn more, you should be thinking of ways to make them more productive/valuable, not finding ways to prevent students, the poor, and the unskilled, from accepting jobs that pay less than what you feel they should get paid. How dare you? Laws that mandate a minimum wage just backfire and hurt the very people we are trying to help.

I TOLD YOU…


HE DID TELL US — I GUESS NO ONE WAS LISTENING!