Chief Science Officer for Pfizer Says “Second Wave” Faked on False-Positive COVID Tests, “Pandemic is Over”


R-Posted Oct 2, 2020 by Martin Armstrong

COMMENT: If Gates and company are so intent on population reduction, then why not let the fake virus kill off more people? Stop masking and distancing and all the other rubbish and let the disease spread like wildfire. Doesn’t make sense in some respects.

TM

REPLY: I agree. Let it all happen and if it is so lethal, then pray it will be like the Black Plague and reduce the population by 50%. The problem has been that they know it is not serious, but they are using it to expand authoritative power. They imposed masks to break up human interaction; they also imposed social distancing, which has destroyed retail businesses and has even threatened our way of life to the point that only 8% of office workers returned to New York City. They want to end commuting so that we will all work from home with no cars.

They are already talking about imposing lockdowns to now save the planet as well. We are dealing with academics who do not even step into the real world. They fail to understand human nature so they keep imposing Marxist philosophy and swear this time it will work but they need an iron fist at first to show us they care.

The evidence that this is all fake and is being carried out for political purposes is just overwhelming. Even the Chief Science Officer for Pfizer said,”Second Wave” Faked on False-Positive COVID Tests, “Pandemic is Over.”

The day of both sides working together are gone. There is something seriously wrong. We have politicians around the world acting ruthlessly, which shows they have no concern about standing for election, which is really strange. Are they being bought to ignore all the objective evidence?

Face Mask Catch 22


I can’t find out why I can’t wear a mask unless I wear a mask to attend the tests offered for the purpose of figuring out why I can’t wear a mask.

Re-Posted from the Canada FreePress By —— Bio and ArchivesOctober 1, 2020

Cover Story | 7 Comments | Reader Friendly | Subscribe | Email Us

 

I am unable to wear a face mask during the COVID-19 scamdemic.  While, politically, I wouldn’t wear one even if I could, the reality is I have a medical exemption that has created some very interesting scenarios, and a Catch 22 that nobody seems to appreciate.

I am an 80% disabled military veteran who receives most of my medical care through the Veteran’s Administration medical facilities.  In March, when this COVID-19 thing got going to the point that the mass paranoia had gripped all points of the globe, I tried wearing a mask five times.

As I have gotten older my system is finding it harder to compensate, so a variety of new challenges are appearing

Three of those instances I became dizzy to the point of throwing up, and two of those times I went into five-hour episodes of vertigo.  I have a history of vertigo due to the left-temporal fracture I incurred while in the United States Navy, so the personal sit and spin session was not a surprise.

The damage from the injury back when I was a young sailor in the military caused extensive scar tissue on the left side of my brain, bruising on the right side, and audio nerve damage on the left side that has left me deaf in my left ear and plagued with a constant ringing in that ear.  I also suffer nerve damage that has left me with a mild case of a left-side facial palsy, left knee issues, and a neck that drives me nuts (a secondary injury from the head trauma that, to this day, the VA refuses to recognize as one of the companion culprits from my service connected accident).  Since then, about six years ago, I suffered a back injury while driving a sand and gravel truck, as well, of which I was denied any worker’s compensation benefits because they believed I had pre-existing conditions thanks to my old military injuries that were not related to my back in any way, and because they filmed me acting totally normal dumping my trash while I was on pain killers.

The back injury has left me with a whole new set of obstacles in life, which, when added to my balance issues, has left me walking with a cane.

The head injury has always provided for me challenges when it comes to balance.  I have joked that I hope I never get pulled over for a DUI because I can’t walk a straight line.  As I have gotten older my system is finding it harder to compensate, so a variety of new challenges are appearing.  A few years ago among the newcomers to my life was vertigo, a nice little condition that sends me into a five hour personal spin session that is beyond horrible and usually leaves me begging God for an early death.

Wearing a face mask can trigger my vertigo

Now, it turns out that wearing a face mask can trigger my vertigo, too, and wearing a face shield makes me dizzy to the point where I want to puke.  So, to figure out what is going on, I contacted my Veteran’s Administration medical folks and eventually got a referral to neurology so that we can figure out why face masks are pretty much an impossible fashionwear for me.

A couple weeks ago when I went to the VA facility in La Jolla, California (nudged right up against San Diego) it took me forty-five minutes to get into the compound because I can’t wear a mask.  The rules are, no mask, no entry.  But, my appointment was for the purpose of figuring out why I can’t wear a mask.  “See the irony?” I asked the lady blocking my entry.

“Do you have paperwork showing you have this disability?” she asked.

“I hope to by the end of the day if I can just get in in the first place,” I snapped back.

Eventually, they wheeled me by wheelchair to the back entrance by the spinal cord area because the elevators are near the back entrance doors, and that would expose me to as few people as possible.

As if I had the plague, or something.

“The rules are, no mask, no entry”

Once I was wheeled up to the neurology department the lady behind the glass, wearing a mask, advised me that I could not go in without a mask.

Here we go again.

“I can’t wear a mask, and part of the reason I am here is to try and figure out why wearing a mask causes all kinds of problems for me.”

“Well,” she said in a condescending tone, “the rules are, no mask, no entry.”

I laughed.  “Do you people not see the ridiculousness, here?  I am here to seek medical attention to find out why I can’t wear a mask, but you are not admitting me because I have no mask on my face.”

“Let me talk to my administrator,” she said, before vanishing through a door on the far side of the dark room.

After she came back she advised me I can only come in without face protection if I stay in the wheelchair, someone from the facility wheels me in, and the neurologist has been advised to wear extra protection.  When I was wheeled into the room, she was wearing a mask and a face shield.

I was advised that originally they had tried to call me to change my appointment to a video call appointment.

“Then,” I asked, “how would you examine me?”

I got no answer.  She then asked me a barrage of questions, and then, yes, physically examined me.

She then advised me that a recent (CAT) scan of my brain revealed a twisting blood vessel and a growth on the audio nerve near where it entered my brain.  She wanted me to get some bloodwork, and an MRI, so that she could check a few things.  We thanked her, and then a medical assistant wheeled me back out in my wheelchair.

Upon attempting to get my bloodwork done, they would not let me back in unless I wear a face mask.

So, we went home.

A week later we called a VA clinic closer to our home to ask if I could get the bloodwork done at that facility.  They said, “Yes.”  I then explained I cannot wear a mask.

“No mask, no entry,” she said.

“Are you saying,” I asked, “that if I don’t wear a mask I can’t get the care I need to figure out why I can’t wear a mask?”

“I didn’t say that.”

“Yes, you did.”

“Tell you what, let me talk to an administrator to find out what to do.  She’ll call you back with the answer.”

That was two days ago.

The MRI people had the same response.  They are not sure if they can let me in without a mask, either, unless an administrator gives the okay, you know, so that I can get an MRI to help us figure out why I can’t wear a mask.

Why does it take an administrator who does not know my medical history to approve my entry?  And, even more important, do they not see the Catch 22 they have me in when it comes to all of this?  I can’t find out why I can’t wear a mask unless I wear a mask to attend the tests offered for the purpose of figuring out why I can’t wear a mask.

Dizzying, to say the least.

Implanting Chips into People as a Solution for COVID?


I really have a problem with them implanting a chip into me for this COVID-19 BS when it is nothing worse than the flu. It just seems that this is way over-the-top to scare everyone into some crazy new world where we are chipped, our DNA changed, and then what? The people behind this move, Gates and Klaus Schwab, are so concerned about overpopulation that I cannot accept that any of this is to protect us to so the population increases even more.

Even in Britain, the English Bill of Rights has been shredded. They are prompting Immunity passports claiming they can speed up the return to work after COVID-19. Meanwhile, the vaccine producers want immunity in Europe as they already have in the United States. Politicians who grant such immunity do NOT represent the people. Any other industry is libel for their mistakes. With immunity, they do not need to make sure their vaccines do no harm. Who cares? They have absolute immunity! That is NOT a position that I would have any trust in whatsoever. The EU granted immunity to AstraZeneca for their vaccine. Even asking for immunity confirms there are problems for a sizable portion of the population.

In Germany, the data on the health situation and mortality revealed that there has apparently NEVER BEEN an epidemiological emergency. This coronavirus appears to be just a seasonal wave comparable to normal flu. There is clearly far too much evidence that shows this coronavirus is by no means serious, yet governments are using this to shut down gatherings and the shut down international travel.

They have damaged the economy by an endless stream of corrupt acts. It was the Clinton Administration that repealed Glass Steagall, which allowed the 2007-2009 Financial Crisis, and then they also handed the bankers students by removing their right to declare bankruptcy on student loans for degrees that have proved worthless. This is preventing people from affording rent on apartments or from participating in buying homes. A record number of young adults over 30 are now living at home with their parents.

Parliamentary advisor to the German Bundestag Has Come Out Warn the People


Warnung an die Bevölkerung
Anonym, September 2020
Parlamentarischer Berater des Deutschen Bundestages
Liebe Mitbürgerinnen und Mitbürger,
ich wende mich als Mitarbeiter des Deutschen Bundestages mit der Funktion eines parlamentarischen Beraters an Sie. Durch meine Tätigkeit im Parlament habe ich Kenntnis davon, dass den Menschen in unserem Land wichtige Informationen in Zusammenhang mit der Coronakrise gezielt vorenthalten werden, obwohl diese zur Beurteilung der Situation von entscheidender Bedeutung sind. Ich sehe es, bedingt durch die enorme Tragweite der jüngsten Ereignisse als Pflicht gegenüber meinen Mitbürgern an, diese Dinge öffentlich zu thematisieren.
Vermutlich werden viele diesen Text bereits nach wenigen Zeilen zur Seite legen, weil sie sich eine vorsätzliche Täuschung der Bevölkerung nicht vorstellen können. Ich habe Verständnis dafür, denn auch ich hätte früher eine derartige Vorstellung als “Verschwörungstheorie” abgetan. Doch mittlerweile musste ich, nicht zuletzt durch meine Erlebnisse im Bundestag erkennen, welche Methoden weltweit von Regierungen, Medien und einflussreichen Akteuren der Privatwirtschaft zu unser aller Nachteil angewendet werden und dass die Bevölkerung dem leider zu häufig zu unkritisch begegnet. Ich hoffe dennoch, dass der eine oder andere meine Hinweise zumindest überprüfen wird.
Aufgrund der besorgniserregenden Tatsache, dass kritische Stimmen in Deutschland mittlerweile diffamiert, angegriffen und in ihrer Existenz regelrecht vernichtet werden, bin ich gezwungen, dieses Schreiben anonym zu veröffentlichen. Auch meine Fraktionszugehörigkeit kann ich aus demselben Grund nicht angeben. Diese spielt ohnehin keine Rolle, denn wir müssen in Deutschland dringend wieder lernen, uns “lagerübergreifend” zuzuhören und zu respektieren. Wenn wir nicht bald zu einem solchen Miteinander zurückfinden, wird unsere Gesellschaft endgültig in verfeindete Gruppen zersplittern. Leider hat der Umgang mit Corona bereits jetzt dazu beigetragen, die gesellschaftlichen Gräben weiter zu vertiefen. Insofern ist es für mein Anliegen zielführend, die Angabe meiner Fraktion offenzulassen. Nachweise für meine Tätigkeit im Parlament sind am Ende des Dokuments angefügt.
Sie, liebe Leserin und lieber Leser, sollen nur Folgendes über mich wissen: Ich schreibe diesen Bericht in aufrichtiger Sorge um die Sicherheit, die Freiheit sowie den Wohlstand von uns allen. Diese tragenden Säulen unserer Demokratie sind akut gefährdet, denn die Coronakrise wird von verschiedenen Seiten her instrumentalisiert und unsere berechtigten Sorgen wegen des Coronavirus werden für fremde Ziele missbraucht und ausgenutzt.
Ich muss an dieser Stelle betonen, dass ich die Gesundheitsrisiken in Zusammenhang mit dem Virus nicht verharmlosen will. Corona kann insbesondere für ältere sowie vorerkrankte Menschen eine ernste Gefahr sein, dieser Fakt ist unbestritten. Gleichzeitig muss ich jedoch feststellen, dass verschiedene Akteure mit verzerrender Berichterstattung und aus dem Zusammenhang gerissenen Horrorbildern systematisch Angst in der Bevölkerung verbreiten und damit ein Bild der Pandemie zeichnen, dass nicht der Realität entspricht. Ziel dieser Kräfte aus Politik, Weltwirtschaft und Medien ist es, von weitreichenden politischen und wirtschaftlichen Veränderungen abzulenken, die im Hintergrund der Krise ablaufen und für die Corona “wie gerufen” kommt.
Weiterhin sollen die Menschen in ihrer Angst vor dem Virus Maßnahmen und dauerhafte Einschränkungen akzeptieren, die angesichts der Situation in keiner Weise gerechtfertigt sind und die gegen die Interessen der Bevölkerung verstoßen. Vieles davon ist mit öffentlich zugänglichen Quellen nachvollziehbar, die eigentlichen Ziele der Maßnahmen werden den Bürgern dabei jedoch verschwiegen. Über diese Hintergründe möchte ich Sie mit meinem Bericht informieren und ich lade Sie herzlich ein, meine Ausführungen zu überprüfen, noch bevor Ihnen diese Möglichkeit durch breite Zensur dauerhaft genommen wird.
I.
Das Weltwirtschaftsforum WEF (a2) als Sprachrohr der einflussreichsten internationalen Konzerne und Großbanken instrumentalisiert die Krise, um eine lange vorbereitete Agenda zur Neuordnung der gesamten Weltwirtschaft umzusetzen (1). Dieser “Great Reset” wird uns dabei als Wandel der Globalisierung hin zu einer nachhaltigen Wirtschaft verkauft, doch handelt es sich hierbei um eine Täuschung. Tatsächlich wollen die Akteure des WEF damit eine weitestgehende Zentralisierung der politischen Macht in überstaatlichen Institutionen wie der UN, EU und dem IWF erreichen, sowie völlig neuartige, supranationale Organe schaffen. Über diese Organisationen wollen sie die demokratische Kontrolle der Weltwirtschaft und -politik durch gewählte Parlamente dauerhaft aushebeln, weil sich aus ihrer Sicht bislang zu viele Nationalstaaten den Privatisierungsorgien der Konzerne und der Finanzspekulanten nicht beugen wollen.
Darüber hinaus will man den Mittelstand endgültig verdrängen und die freiwerdenden Markt

TRANSLATION:

Warning to the population
Anonymous, September 2020
Parliamentary advisor to the German Bundestag
Dear fellow citizens,
I am addressing you as an employee of the German Bundestag with the function of a parliamentary advisor. Through my work in Parliament, I am aware that important information in connection with the corona crisis is being withheld from people in our country, although this is of crucial importance for assessing the situation. Due to the enormous scope of recent events, I see it as my duty to my fellow citizens to publicly discuss these things.
Presumably, many will put this text aside after just a few lines, because they cannot imagine deliberately deceiving the population. I understand that, because I would have earlier dismissed such an idea as a “conspiracy theory”. But in the meantime, not least through my experiences in the Bundestag, I have had to recognize which methods are being used by governments, media and influential actors in the private sector around the world to the detriment of all of us and that unfortunately the population is too often too uncritical about this. I still hope that one or the other will at least check my hints.
Due to the worrying fact that critical voices in Germany are meanwhile being defamed, attacked and literally destroyed in their existence, I am forced to publish this letter anonymously. For the same reason, I cannot state my group membership. This does not play a role anyway, because we in Germany urgently need to learn again to listen to and respect each other “across camps”. If we don’t soon find our way back to such a togetherness, our society will finally split up into hostile groups. Unfortunately, dealing with Corona has already contributed to deepening the social rifts. In this respect, it is expedient for my concern to leave the information given by my group open. Evidence of my work in Parliament is attached at the end of the document.
You, dear reader, should only know the following about me: I am writing this report with sincere concern for the security, freedom and prosperity of all of us. These supporting pillars of our democracy are acutely endangered because the corona crisis is being instrumentalized from various sides and our legitimate concerns about the corona virus are being misused and exploited for foreign goals.
I have to emphasize at this point that I do not want to play down the health risks associated with the virus. Corona can be a serious danger, especially for older people as well as those with previous illnesses, this fact is undisputed. At the same time, however, I have to state that various actors with distorting reporting and horror images taken out of context are systematically spreading fear in the population and thus painting a picture of the pandemic that does not correspond to reality. The aim of these forces from politics, the global economy and the media is to divert attention from the far-reaching political and economic changes that are taking place in the background of the crisis and for which Corona comes “as called”.
Furthermore, in their fear of the virus, people should accept measures and permanent restrictions that are in no way justified in view of the situation and that go against the interests of the population. Much of this can be traced back to publicly available sources, but the actual goals of the measures are concealed from the public. I would like to inform you about this background with my report and I cordially invite you to review my remarks before this option is permanently denied you by broad censorship.
I.
The World Economic Forum WEF (a2), as the mouthpiece of the most influential international corporations and big banks, is instrumentalizing the crisis in order to implement a long-prepared agenda for the reorganization of the entire world economy (1). This “Great Reset” is sold to us as a change in globalization towards a sustainable economy, but this is a delusion. In fact, the actors of the WEF want to achieve the greatest possible centralization of political power in supranational institutions such as the UN, EU and the IMF, as well as to create completely new, supranational organs. Through these organizations, they want to permanently undermine the democratic control of the world economy and politics by elected parliaments, because from their point of view too many nation states have so far refused to bow to the privatization orgies of corporations and financial speculators.
In addition one wants to displace the middle class and the market that is becoming free

The Head Adviser on Vaccines has Stock in the Company Charged with Making the Vaccine for UK


The Chief Scientific Adviser, who is leading the Government’s expert panel on vaccines, has 43,111 shares in GlaxoSmithKline (GSK) from his time as president of the drugs company. This is the company the UK government has contracted to make the vaccine. The Government has denied arguments that this is a potential conflict of interest, asserting that he is not involved in commercial decisions on coronavirus vaccines.

London Police Attack COVID Protestors on Saturday 9/26/2020


Once again, the London police continue to support the government and attacked peaceful protestors in Trafalgar Square. No matter what the evidence, the government is maintaining these Draconian lockdowns. We can see that the protest was peaceful until the police showed up to brutally abuse the rights of the people that will suppress their own family’s future.

Unfortunately, the London police are supporting absolute tyranny. This is clearly part of this global agenda to hand sovereignty to the United Nations. It may sound more like a conspiracy theory, but already there is talk in London that they will next use these lockdowns to combat Climate Change. Keeping people from commuting to work to reduce fuel consumption. Mariana Mazzucato, a professor in the Economics of Innovation and Public Value at University College London and also a Founding Director of the UCL Institute for Innovation and Public Purpose. She has bought into the UN agenda and claims that the world is “approaching a tipping point on climate change, when protecting the future of civilization will require dramatic interventions.”

Mazzucato is suggesting that if we do not reduce CO2, then these lockdowns will be justified to save the planet. We are already dealing with a fake pandemic, which is clearly being used to expand the powers of government. They have Europe in their back-pocket, New Zealand, and of course Australia under the insane control of the madman Daniels Andrews. Above, is street art in Melbourne against this orchestrated agenda. What has escaped most of the headline is what is going on in Canada. Prime Minister Justin Trudeau who has suspended Parliament. This battle to overthrow Trump is part of this Globalist Agenda. If they can get rid of Trump, then all that stands in their way is China and Russia. They intend to impose sanctions to try to force them to comply with this UN Agenda.

 

Sky News – Something is Strange in Europe


 

Florida Governor Reopens State – Removes Restrictions on Restaurants, Nullifies All Local Mask Ordinances, Blocks Fines and Penalties…


Florida Governor Ron DeSantis has moved the entire state into phase three of the COVID-19 recovery plan.  All restrictions against restaurants and businesses are removed by executive order [HERE] and all local mask ordinances are nullified by the same order.

♦ No COVID ordinance may forbid or impede any business from operating.

♦ No COVID ordinance may forbid restaurants to operate below 50% capacity. Any local ordinances against these operational thresholds are nullified.

♦ No local mask ordinances shall carry any weight of enforcement.

♦ No COVID Fines or Penalties may be applied toward any individual or business operating in the State of Florida.  (executive order)

 

Did The First Lockdown Trigger The Second Wave?


The good news? If Trump wins, they won’t be able to stop that great awakening from spreading. Nor will they escape accountability.

Mark Gray image

Re-Posted from the Canada Free Press By  —— Bio and ArchivesSeptember 24, 2020

Did The First Lockdown Trigger The Second Wave?

COVID-19’s second wave will fail worse than the first. Politicians will use it to justify further tyranny now, but as the second wave recedes it will leave fully exposed the dark heart of evil that runs our lives. Our “leaders” will eventually rue the day they embraced totalitarianism.

If the answer to the title question is yes, the coming “second wave” is an “unexpected consequence” of the lockdown as we were told we’d be “safe” if we agreed to an aggressive response that included shutting schools, parks, and businesses down, quarantining the healthy, and following some sketchy safety guidelines.

Original COVID-19 models were critically flawed, producing alarming projections at odds with reality

We now know beyond any reasonable doubt that the original COVID-19 models were critically flawed, producing alarming projections at odds with reality. That panicked alarm, not the ignored reality, is what spread across the globe like wildfire, and in doing so created the “need” for a strong political response explicitly designed to “save” us.

The politicians who swallowed the COVID Kool aid, which is to say, all of them, leapt into action with liberty shredding decisions to shut down this, lock down that, and coerce abeyance with idiotic “safety” guidelines. Putting on a mask to enter a restaurant only to pull it off at the table, for example, makes no logical sense. It obviously isn’t about safety, which means it must be about the rule, or more specifically, the right to enforce the silly rule.

The entire political response—every rule, regulation, law, mandate, and guideline—was designed to save us from a false perception, not the underlying reality of a greater than 99.9% survival rate. Building solutions based on seriously bad information will always lead to “unexpected” consequences because the problem being solved doesn’t exist. This ignorance ensures policy failure, essentially guaranteeing harsh, negative consequences for us all.

If you prefer images, picture a surgeon removing the wrong limb as an example of bad information driving negative consequences.

First Wave Consequences, Second Wave Troubles

It is important to note that many of the first wave lockdown consequences were fully expected, and because of their ferocious impact, were initially sold as a short term, temporary solution. The politicians knew locking everything down would lead to massive job losses, personal and business bankruptcies, misdirected taxpayer resources, a loss of health services, which is a real health crisis, and a gross violation of civil liberties. They knew their decisions would hurt, yet they proceeded without hesitation. They knew then, and they know even better now. And yet?

The media’s second wave reporting has focused heavily on the recent rise in “number of cases” across the country, stoking fears on the assumption of a direct, causal relationship between cases and deaths.  This thinking makes sense on the surface as deaths quickly followed the rise in first wave cases, but this case-death correlation doesn’t show up in the second wave statistics, an indicator the virus is struggling to find viable victims.

This hasn’t slowed the media’s frantic fear mongering in the slightest, and they continue to press the idea that further lockdown measures are a political necessity because we face another wave of viral massacre. However, if the second wave rise in cases is an “unexpected” consequence of the first’s mistaken lockdown, something that shouldn’t have occurred, then its value to the decision-making process is also suspect and should be reviewed.

So, is there any evidence that indicates the “second wave” is a negative consequence of misguided “first wave” lockdown policies?

The Data Damns Our Decision Makers

The first two charts compare Daily COVID-19 Deaths between lockdown UK and non-lockdown Sweden, which allows us to explore the impact UK lockdown policies had on deaths.  The second two charts add the number of daily cases into the mix, allowing us to evaluate the relationship between cases and deaths for the UK and Sweden in both the first and second waves.

Daily New Deaths In United Kingdom

Daily New Deaths In Sweden

 

Although the UK and Sweden took different routes, the similarity between the lockdown and non-lockdown death curves is apparent, as is the inference that lockdowns had little effect on the lethality of the virus.

Now, let’s take a peek at the Daily Case numbers.

Daily New Deaths vs Cases in United Kingdom

Daily New Deaths vs Cases in Sweden

Fight ELITIST SUPPRESSION—Make CFP Your Go-To Home Page!There is a substantial difference in the Daily Case curves between the UK and Sweden, suggesting that although lockdown policies have little impact on daily deaths, they do have a significant effect on how the virus spreads.

While Sweden’s decision to remain open delayed the peak of their first wave Daily Cases curve, the chart shows deaths peaked and began dropping long before the virus finished spreading at its quickest. The chart shows Sweden’s second wave arrived and departed between August and September without causing a respective rise in deaths. In fact, the Daily Death curve shows no upward bounce at all.

The UK’s Daily Cases, strangely enough, began climbing after their summer mask mandate. However, the “expected” rise in Daily Deaths failed to materialize.

So,

  • Lockdown policies did set the stage for a second wave.
  • COVID-19 has lost its lethality and any rise in “second wave” deaths will likely resemble a ripple rather than a tsunami.
  • The political/media complex want us to live in lockdown. (Evil a hard pill to swallow?)

News vs Fake News

Generally speaking, the purpose of “News” is to inform. It may enhance the value of that information by adding context related analyses but by and large, News occurs after the act has happened and does its best to bring perceptions in line with reality.

Conversely, because Fake News eschews reality, it must lead with a lie of desire rather than follow the truth of events. Its success is determined by how well it is able to convince people to believe things that aren’t true, such as COVID-19 being the worst viral bug since the early 1900s, and then exploiting that belief to force political action, which then “legitimizes” the Fake claim and fuels the next News cycle. From that point there is only one acceptable direction: Forward!

Belief is key, because once set it automatically protects itself by immediately rejecting contradictory facts and figures that would destroy it. How else can we rationalize mask mandates for populations with survival rates over 99.99%, like the 8 provinces not named Quebec and Ontario? How does the call to shut down schools and mask-up children comport with this report showing zero deaths, none, out of over 48,000 cases in US Universities?

The logical disconnect is obvious, but it still isn’t enough to unseat the Fake belief “we’re all gonna die”. This leaves us fearful and exploitable. Share some COVID-19 truths with a masker then sit back and watch. You will often see the alarm grow in their eyes as the cognitive dissonance sets in. Unfortunately, that alarm is typically silenced by rejecting the painful truth and ending the discussion.

Why are western societies across the globe teetering on the brink of totalitarian terror? Because Fake News, evil as it is, works! We either eliminate it from our lives or it will continue to eliminate freedom from ours.

The world really is in an existential battle between good and evil. The rioting, lockdowns, and hatred roiling the globe are not signs of a revolution so much as they are panicked signals the corrupt cabal running things is being systematically exposed. They will get uglier.

The good news? If Trump wins, they won’t be able to stop that great awakening from spreading. Nor will they escape accountability.

COVID vaccine clinical trials doomed to fail; fatal design flaw; NY Times opinion piece exposes all three major clinical trials


Or, do the vaccine manufacturers have a devious trick up their sleeves?

Jon Rappoport image

Re-posted from the Canada Free Press By  —— Bio and ArchivesSeptember 24, 2020

 

COVID vaccine clinical trials doomed to fail; fatal design flaw

PART ONE: THE FAILURE

Peter Doshi, associate editor of the medical journal BMJ, and Eric Topol, Scripps Research professor of molecular medicine, have written a devastating NY Times opinion piece about the ongoing COVID vaccine clinical trials.

They expose the fatal flaw in the large Pfizer, AstraZeneca, and Moderna trials.

September 22, the Times: “These Coronavirus Trials Don’t Answer the One Question We Need to Know”:

Clinical trials are dead in the water

“If you were to approve a coronavirus vaccine, would you approve one that you only knew protected people only from the most mild form of Covid-19, or one that would prevent its serious complications?”

“The answer is obvious. You would want to protect against the worst cases.”

“But that’s not how the companies testing three of the leading coronavirus vaccine candidates, Moderna, Pfizer and AstraZeneca, whose U.S. trial is on hold, are approaching the problem.”

“According to the protocols for their studies, which they released late last week, a vaccine could meet the companies’ benchmark for success if it lowered the risk of mild Covid-19, but was never shown to reduce moderate or severe forms of the disease, or the risk of hospitalization, admissions to the intensive care unit or death.”

“To say a vaccine works should mean that most people no longer run the risk of getting seriously sick. That’s not what these trials will determine.”

This means these clinical trials are dead in the water.

There is no need to create a vaccine that prevents mild cases

(Read about Jon’s mega-collection, The Matrix Revealed)

The trials are designed to show effectiveness in preventing mild cases of COVID, which nobody should care about, because mild cases naturally run their course and cause no harm.  THERE IS NO NEED FOR A VACCINE THAT PREVENTS MILD CASES.

Now let’s go deeper.  Read the next section from the Times piece, and then I’ll make comments.

“The Moderna and AstraZeneca studies will involve about 30,000 participants each; Pfizer’s will have 44,000. Half the participants will receive two doses of vaccines separated by three or four weeks, and the other half will receive saltwater placebo shots. The final determination of efficacy will occur after 150 to 160 participants develop Covid-19…”

Here’s how it works.  The vaccine companies are looking for a total of 150 (mild) COVID cases to occur, combined, in the two groups; those receiving the placebo and those receiving the vaccine.  How would that happen?  The researchers believe ‘the coronavirus is spreading everywhere and it will pounce on some of the volunteers in the clinical trial.’

Let’s say that, during the trial, 100 people receiving the placebo develop mild COVID-19, and only 50 people receiving the vaccine develop mild COVID.

The vaccine companies would say, ‘We just proved the vaccine is 50% effective in preventing COVID, and that’s all we need to do, in order to win authorization from the FDA.  Release the vaccine.  Inject the world.’

The irrelevant outcomes for 150 people equal ‘let’s shoot up seven billion people.’  That’s staggering.

But it gets even worse.  The magic number of 150 COVID cases?  How is a COVID case defined?  The authors of the Times piece have the answer:

“In the Moderna and Pfizer trials, even a mild case of Covid-19 – for instance, a cough plus a positive lab test – would qualify and muddy the results. AstraZeneca is slightly more stringent but would still count mild symptoms like a cough plus fever as a case.”

But wait.  The NY Times itself recently published an article stating that up to 90% of US COVID cases could very well be false positives—-in other words, not cases at all.  Why?  Because the diagnostic PCR test, as it is performed by many labs, is too sensitive.  It registers ‘positive for COVID’ when it shouldn’t.

So, in these vaccine clinical trials, the whole process of determining that ‘150 people developed COVID-19’ is completely unreliable, useless, absurd, and nonsensical.

Other than that, the clinical trials are perfect.  Yes, perfectly ridiculous.

There is much more in the Times opinion piece, but I’ll leave it there.

“So the magic number is 150?  That’s the number that will decide the immediate fate of the planet?”

“Of course.”

“And these 150 people, who you say develop COVID-19…you really can’t confirm that because the definition of a COVID case is so vague and the PCR test is so unreliable.”

“Correct.”

“And come to think of it, the people receiving the vaccine in the clinical trials could develop symptoms indistinguishable from COVID-19, as a result of the effects of the vaccine.”

“Yes, that’s right.”

“But you’re very confident in the success of the vaccine.”

“Indeed.”

“Why?”

“I have to be confident.  If we’re exposed as incompetent frauds, our bottom line will take a huge hit.”

“Thank you, sir.  And that’s tonight’s news.  Make sure you take the vaccine, everyone.  It’s vital.  This is Fred J Clown, for CBS-NBC-ABC-CNN-FOX-PBS-AP-Reuters and all official news sources East, West, North, and South.  The News, brought to you by Venom-X-2, a medicine that has only 463 adverse effects.  Ask your doctor if Venom is right for you.”

PART TWO: THE DEVIOUS TRICK

Now I’m going to go over the vital information again, but this time I’m going to show you how…

The vaccine companies can use the fatal flaw in their protocol design to…

Actually win approval of their COVID vaccine.

Stick with me.  This is big.

Only 150 people are needed to make the major clinical trials of a COVID vaccine look like a success.

Out of 30,000 volunteers in a trial, researchers are waiting for 150 people to “come down with COVID-19.”  MILD cases.  They assume this will happen because they believe the coronavirus is everywhere, and it’ll infect their volunteers.

Of course, their definition of a mild case of COVID-19 is meaningless.  Cough plus fever, and a positive PCR test.  The test spits out false positives like a rigged slot machine, and the visible symptoms could result from flu, polluted air, or too many candy bars.

Nevertheless, the researchers are waiting for a total of 150 people to “catch a mild case of COVID.”  When that number is reached, everything stops.

Now comes the big moment.  How many of those 150 COVID cases occurred in the group that received the vaccine, and how many in the group that received the placebo shot of salt water?

Let’s say only 50 COVID cases occurred in the vaccine group, and 100 in the placebo group.  The researchers pop champagne corks.  They say, “Look, the vaccine is 50% effective at preventing COVID, and that’s all we need to win authorization from the FDA.”

BUT suppose 70 cases occurred in the vaccine group and 80 in the placebo group?  No good.  No good at all.  No way to call the vaccine effective.

Now comes the “reshaping of the data.”

HERE WE GO.

Fight ELITIST SUPPRESSION—Make CFP Your Go-To Home Page!

Vaccine Companies want success and money now.  They want to win the race

The researchers say, “Wait.  Thirty of the COVID cases in the vaccine group were REALLY just adverse reactions to the vaccine.  They weren’t cases of COVID.  You see, the vaccine can cause symptoms that are indistinguishable from mild COVID.  Cough, fever, chills.  ACTUALLY, there were only 40 cases of COVID in the vaccine group.  Half as many as in the placebo group.  The vaccine IS 50% effective.  We don’t really need to wait until we have a total of 150 COVID cases.  We’re good.  We’re golden.  We can get authorization from the FDA right now to shoot up everybody in America!”

Vaccine manufacturers HAVE KNOWN ALL ALONG that they could pull this trick.

Why leave things to chance?

Why risk a few hundred billion dollars of profit on a random distribution of mild COVID cases among the volunteers in their clinical trials?

There is yet a further devious twist.  The New York Times article I just analyzed torpedoed the vaccine manufacturers for designing their trial protocols to prevent MILD cases of COVID.  Why?

Because no one needs a vaccine that can do that.  Mild cases are not a problem or a threat.  They cure themselves quickly.  No vaccine is necessary in the first place.

BUT the definition of a mild COVID case is EXACTLY what the vaccine manufacturers needed.  It enabled them to hatch a plan, to make sure they didn’t fail.

They could pawn off a MILD case of COVID on a vaccine reaction.  They could fake that without causing ripples.  The FDA would say, “The vaccine reactions aren’t serious.  All right, no problem.  We’ll approve this vaccine for emergency use.”

However…If the manufacturers designed their clinical trial protocol to prevent serious cases of COVID, they would be waiting to see 150 cases of really sick people to occur.  That might never happen.

If it did happen, and the manufacturers had to pull their devious switcheroo trick and blame the vaccine for some of these SERIOUS cases…

They would have to tell the FDA that their vaccine was causing life-threatening pneumonia; and the FDA, under a lot of scrutiny these days, would find it very difficult to overlook that.

FDA: “We can’t approve this vaccine.  It could cause a few million cases of dire pneumonia…”

The vaccine companies didn’t make a titanic stupid mistake in their protocol design.  In gearing the protocol to prevent MILD COVID cases, they did what they did on purpose.  It allows them to “reshape their data” and win FDA approval for their vaccine.

These companies have no intention of failing, starting over, and spending a year recruiting 30,000 new volunteers.  They want success and money now.  They want to win the race.

And they could win, if the truth isn’t known and shared widely.

(The link to this article posted on my blog is here.)